Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 殊價慾望規範性之探討
作者 游偉迪
Yu, Wei-Di
貢獻者 陳聽安
Chen, Ting-An
游偉迪
Yu, Wei-Di
關鍵詞 殊價慾望
殊價財
規範性
個人主權
公共財
外部性
慾望
偏好
merit wants
Merit goods
normativity
individual sovereignty
public goods
externality
wants
preference
日期 2000
上傳時間 31-Mar-2016 15:31:57 (UTC+8)
摘要 在探討殊價慾望的規範性意義時,必先瞭解殊價慾望在規範意義上的爭議,而欲瞭解其爭議所在,則首先需從殊價慾望的定義與特性著手。然而困難之處就在於,殊價慾望的定義不僅有失明確,且有因人而異、各陳己見的情況,甚至Musgrave本人亦數度更改對殊價慾望意義的認定。
參考文獻 中文部分
黃世鑫(1979),《殊價財之最適供給》,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
黃世鑫(1998a),《財政學概論》,國立空中大學。
黃世鑫(1998b),「老年安全制度與政府財政」,年金制度及其法律規範學術研討會,政治大學法學院、行政院經建會、臺灣法學會、中德文教基金會。
蘇慧君(1999),《社會福利與分配正義-論約翰彌爾之社會福利思想》,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
英文部分
Addleson, Mark(1995), Equilibrium Versus Understanding, Routledge, Part 1.
Atkinson, A. B.(1998), Poverty In Europe, Blackwell, 88, 92-93.
Auld, D. A. L. and P. C. Bing(1971), "Merit Wants: A Further Analysis", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 30, No. 2, 257-265.
Ballentine, J. G.(1972/73), "Merit Goods, Information, and Corrected Preferences", Finanzarchiv, N.F., Band 30, Heft 2, 298-306.
Basu, K.(1976), "Retrospective Choice and Merit Goods", Finanzarchiv, N.F., Vol. 34, No. 2, 220-225.
Besley, T.(1988), "A Simple Model for Merit Good Arguements", Journal of Public Economics, 35, 371-383.
Boadway, R. W. and D. E. Wildasin(1984), Public Sector Economics, 2nd Edition, HWA-TAI BOOK CO., Taiwan version, 170.
Brenna, Geoffrey and Loren Lomasky(1983), "Institutional Aspects of `Merit Goods` Analysis", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 41, No. 2, 183-206.
Brown, C. V. and P. M. Jackson(1990), Public Sector Economics, 4th Edition, Blackwell, 47, 51-52.
Buchanan, J. M. and R. A. Musgrave(1999), Public Finance and Public Choice-Two Contrasting Visions of The State, The MIT Press, 94-96.
Burkhead, J. and J. Miner(1971), Public Expenditure, 125-133.
Charles, Susan and T. Westaway(1981), "Ignorance and Merit Wants", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 39, No. 1, 74-78.
Culyer, A. J.(1971), "Merit Goods and The Welfare Economics of Coercion", Public Finance, vol. 26, No. 4, 546-572.
Head, J. G. (1969), "Merit Goods Revisited", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 28, No. 2, 214-25.
Helms, L. J.(1983), "Modern Public Finance: The Neoclassical Approach", in: Political Economy: Recent Views L. L. Wade(ed.), 27-67.
Hillman, A. L.(1980), "Notions of Merit Want", Public Finance, Vol. XXXV, No. 2, 213-226.
McLure, C. E.(1968), "Merit Wants: A Normatively Empty Box", Finanzarchiv, N. F., vol. 27, No. 3, 474-483.
Musgrave, R. A.(1959a), The Theory of Public Finance, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc..
_______(1959b), "On Merit Goods", in: Public Finance in a Democratic Society(1986), Vol. 1, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 34-40.
_______(1969), "Provision for Social Goods", in: Public Finance in a Democratic Society(1986), Vol. 1, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 41-58.
_______(1970), "Allocation, Distribution and The Theory of Public Finance", in: Theorie und Praxis des Finanzpolitischen Interventionsismus, Hrsg. Von H-Haller and a. Tubingen, 29-45.
_______ and Peggy B. Musgrave(1973), Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 5th Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 55-58.
_______(1983), "Public Finance, Now and Then", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 41, No. 1, 1-13.
Pazner, E. A.(1972), "Merit Wants and The Theory of Taxation", Public Finance, Vol. 27, No. 4, 460-472.
Penz, G. P.(1986), Consumer Sovereignty and Human Interests, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pulsipher, A. G.(1971/72), "The Properties and Relevance of Merit Goods", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 30, No. 2, 266-86.
Rosen, H. S.(1992), Public Finance, 3rd Edition, IRWIN, 56-57.
Roskemp, K. W.(1975), "Public Goods, Private Goods, Pareto Optimum and Social Optimum", Public Finance, Vol. 30, No. 1, 61-69.
Sandmo, A.(1983), "Ex post Welfare Economics and The Theory of Merit Goods", Economica, 50, 19-33.
Sen, A. K.(1977), "Rational Fools: A Critique of The Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317-344.
Shoup, C. S.(1969), Public Finance, Auldine Publishing Company, Ch. 5.
Stiglitz, J. E.(1988), Economics of The Public Sector, 2nd Edition, Norton, 80-83, 92, 93-94, 334.
Tresch, R. W.(1981), Public Finance-a normative theory, Business Publications, Inc., 3-10, 628-629.
Ver Eecke, W.(1998), "The Concept of a `Merit Good` The Ethical Dimension in Economics Theory and The History of Economic Thought or The Transformation of Economics Into Socio-Economics", Journal of Socio-Economics, vol. 27, No. 1, 133-153.
Wenzel, H. and W. Wiegard(1981), "Merit Goods and Second-Best Taxation", Public Finance, Vol. XXXVI, No. 1, 125-140.
Wong, Stanley(1978), The Foundations of Paul Samuelson`s Revealed Preferences Theory-A Study by The Method of Rational Reconstruction, London, Heuley and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 28.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
87255010
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001834
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳聽安zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Ting-Anen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 游偉迪zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Yu, Wei-Dien_US
dc.creator (作者) 游偉迪zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Yu, Wei-Dien_US
dc.date (日期) 2000en_US
dc.date.accessioned 31-Mar-2016 15:31:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 31-Mar-2016 15:31:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 31-Mar-2016 15:31:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) A2002001834en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/83265-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財政學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 87255010zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在探討殊價慾望的規範性意義時,必先瞭解殊價慾望在規範意義上的爭議,而欲瞭解其爭議所在,則首先需從殊價慾望的定義與特性著手。然而困難之處就在於,殊價慾望的定義不僅有失明確,且有因人而異、各陳己見的情況,甚至Musgrave本人亦數度更改對殊價慾望意義的認定。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 封面頁
證明書
致謝詞
論文摘要
目錄
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機
第二節 研究方法與架構
第三節 研究限制
第二章 眾說紛云的殊價慾望-新古典觀點
第一節 殊價慾望與殊價財-意義與特性認知之分歧
一、殊價慾望與殊價財之區別
二、殊價慾望認知之歧異
第二節 殊價財的最適供給?
一、外部性(效用依存性)
二、資訊與學習效果
三、社會的偏好
四、社會計劃者
五、事後的福利經濟學
第三章 殊價慾望規範性之力挽-典範的轉移
第一節 個人的社會性偏好
第二節 制度觀點下的殊價財分析
一、選民的選擇與市場的選擇
二、p-偏好、m-偏好與殊價財
三、本節批評與建議
第三節 殊價財的社會經濟學觀點
一、問題的溯源
二、財貨的分類與殊價財的界定
三、可能性條件(conditions of possibility or possibility conditions)
四、以可能性條件辯證的數種殊價財
五、本節批評與建議
第四章 個人主義的真諦與慾望的本質
第一節 對新古典個人主義方法論的反動
第二節 真正的個人主義(True Individualism)與分析架構之建立
一、第三人稱觀點(third-person perspective)vs.第一人稱觀點(first-person perspective)
二、捨棄價值中立主義(Relinquishing Wertfreiheit)
三、拒絕均衡說(Rejecting Equilibrium)
四、摒棄預測功能(Abandoning Prediction)
第三節 慾望的本質、分類,與衡量的原則
一、慾望的範圍(The Range of Wants)
二、能夠代表利益(interest)的慾望
三、慾望衡量的原則-最適化問題(Optimization)
第四節 消費者主權vs.個人主權(personal sovereignty)
一、消費者主權
二、私人主權(private sovereignty)
三、個人主權
四、理性的判定與偏好的形成
第五節 殊價慾望的內涵與觀點融合
一、殊價慾望之內涵
二、不同觀點的融合
三、政府介入之規範性
第五章 結論
參考文獻
zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001834en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 殊價慾望zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 殊價財zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 規範性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 個人主權zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公共財zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 外部性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 慾望zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 偏好zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) merit wantsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Merit goodsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) normativityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) individual sovereigntyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) public goodsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) externalityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) wantsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) preferenceen_US
dc.title (題名) 殊價慾望規範性之探討zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分
黃世鑫(1979),《殊價財之最適供給》,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
黃世鑫(1998a),《財政學概論》,國立空中大學。
黃世鑫(1998b),「老年安全制度與政府財政」,年金制度及其法律規範學術研討會,政治大學法學院、行政院經建會、臺灣法學會、中德文教基金會。
蘇慧君(1999),《社會福利與分配正義-論約翰彌爾之社會福利思想》,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
英文部分
Addleson, Mark(1995), Equilibrium Versus Understanding, Routledge, Part 1.
Atkinson, A. B.(1998), Poverty In Europe, Blackwell, 88, 92-93.
Auld, D. A. L. and P. C. Bing(1971), "Merit Wants: A Further Analysis", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 30, No. 2, 257-265.
Ballentine, J. G.(1972/73), "Merit Goods, Information, and Corrected Preferences", Finanzarchiv, N.F., Band 30, Heft 2, 298-306.
Basu, K.(1976), "Retrospective Choice and Merit Goods", Finanzarchiv, N.F., Vol. 34, No. 2, 220-225.
Besley, T.(1988), "A Simple Model for Merit Good Arguements", Journal of Public Economics, 35, 371-383.
Boadway, R. W. and D. E. Wildasin(1984), Public Sector Economics, 2nd Edition, HWA-TAI BOOK CO., Taiwan version, 170.
Brenna, Geoffrey and Loren Lomasky(1983), "Institutional Aspects of `Merit Goods` Analysis", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 41, No. 2, 183-206.
Brown, C. V. and P. M. Jackson(1990), Public Sector Economics, 4th Edition, Blackwell, 47, 51-52.
Buchanan, J. M. and R. A. Musgrave(1999), Public Finance and Public Choice-Two Contrasting Visions of The State, The MIT Press, 94-96.
Burkhead, J. and J. Miner(1971), Public Expenditure, 125-133.
Charles, Susan and T. Westaway(1981), "Ignorance and Merit Wants", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 39, No. 1, 74-78.
Culyer, A. J.(1971), "Merit Goods and The Welfare Economics of Coercion", Public Finance, vol. 26, No. 4, 546-572.
Head, J. G. (1969), "Merit Goods Revisited", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 28, No. 2, 214-25.
Helms, L. J.(1983), "Modern Public Finance: The Neoclassical Approach", in: Political Economy: Recent Views L. L. Wade(ed.), 27-67.
Hillman, A. L.(1980), "Notions of Merit Want", Public Finance, Vol. XXXV, No. 2, 213-226.
McLure, C. E.(1968), "Merit Wants: A Normatively Empty Box", Finanzarchiv, N. F., vol. 27, No. 3, 474-483.
Musgrave, R. A.(1959a), The Theory of Public Finance, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc..
_______(1959b), "On Merit Goods", in: Public Finance in a Democratic Society(1986), Vol. 1, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 34-40.
_______(1969), "Provision for Social Goods", in: Public Finance in a Democratic Society(1986), Vol. 1, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 41-58.
_______(1970), "Allocation, Distribution and The Theory of Public Finance", in: Theorie und Praxis des Finanzpolitischen Interventionsismus, Hrsg. Von H-Haller and a. Tubingen, 29-45.
_______ and Peggy B. Musgrave(1973), Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 5th Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 55-58.
_______(1983), "Public Finance, Now and Then", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 41, No. 1, 1-13.
Pazner, E. A.(1972), "Merit Wants and The Theory of Taxation", Public Finance, Vol. 27, No. 4, 460-472.
Penz, G. P.(1986), Consumer Sovereignty and Human Interests, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pulsipher, A. G.(1971/72), "The Properties and Relevance of Merit Goods", Finazarchiv, N.F., vol. 30, No. 2, 266-86.
Rosen, H. S.(1992), Public Finance, 3rd Edition, IRWIN, 56-57.
Roskemp, K. W.(1975), "Public Goods, Private Goods, Pareto Optimum and Social Optimum", Public Finance, Vol. 30, No. 1, 61-69.
Sandmo, A.(1983), "Ex post Welfare Economics and The Theory of Merit Goods", Economica, 50, 19-33.
Sen, A. K.(1977), "Rational Fools: A Critique of The Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317-344.
Shoup, C. S.(1969), Public Finance, Auldine Publishing Company, Ch. 5.
Stiglitz, J. E.(1988), Economics of The Public Sector, 2nd Edition, Norton, 80-83, 92, 93-94, 334.
Tresch, R. W.(1981), Public Finance-a normative theory, Business Publications, Inc., 3-10, 628-629.
Ver Eecke, W.(1998), "The Concept of a `Merit Good` The Ethical Dimension in Economics Theory and The History of Economic Thought or The Transformation of Economics Into Socio-Economics", Journal of Socio-Economics, vol. 27, No. 1, 133-153.
Wenzel, H. and W. Wiegard(1981), "Merit Goods and Second-Best Taxation", Public Finance, Vol. XXXVI, No. 1, 125-140.
Wong, Stanley(1978), The Foundations of Paul Samuelson`s Revealed Preferences Theory-A Study by The Method of Rational Reconstruction, London, Heuley and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 28.
zh_TW