學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 勞動供給、所得稅與超額負擔-台灣的實證研究
作者 許穎心
貢獻者 林全
許穎心
關鍵詞 勞動供給
綜合所得稅
無謂損失
累進所得稅
超額負擔
labor supply
income tax
dead weight loss
progressive income tax
excess burden
日期 2000
上傳時間 31-Mar-2016 15:32:14 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究根據Housman(1981)的實證方式,對我國現行所得稅制對男性經濟戶長之勞動供給影響進行迴歸分析,進而估計目前我國所得稅制度下,個人的最適勞動供給曲線,並求算在此一勞動供給曲線下,所得稅對不同納稅人所造成的無謂損失(分別以高所得階層及中低所得階層代表性個人加以計算)。
     利用民國八十七年「人力資源調查」所做出的實證結果發現,稅後工資率與非勞動所得的變動,對勞動工時皆有相當顯著的解釋能力。其中稅後工資率的係數符號為正,表示當工資上升,休閒相對價格提高,故個人會減少休閒,而勞動工時會相對增加;非勞動工時的係數符號為負,表示休閒為正常財,個人會隨所得提高而增加休閒時間,故勞動工時會相對減少,而比較二者的效果,非勞動所得變動對勞動工時的影響,較稅後工資率變動對勞動工時的影響為大。同時,累進所得稅對勞動供給所造成的無謂損失,無論在絕對量或相對於稅前總所得的比例,皆隨總所得的提高而增加,因此所得稅對高所得者效率上的衝擊較低所得者來得大,亦即所得稅扭曲高所得者的勞動供給行為之程度,較低所得者的扭曲程度為大。
參考文獻 中文部分
     1.陳圳忠(1989),大小家庭結構對已婚婦女勞動供給的影響,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
     2.梁正德(1986),所得稅與勞動供給,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
     3.單驥(1988),我國小家庭夫婦勞動供給之決定-兼論所得稅的影響,經濟論文,No.16.2,pp.251-267。
     4.張慶輝(1982),台灣勞動參與與勞動供給之研究,勞工行政委託研究叢書,行政院勞工委員會。
     5.______(1982),所得稅、家計生產與勞動供給,財稅研究,No.14.5,pp.9-21。
     6.______(1991),我國勞動工給與勞動參與之研究,台北國科會。
     英文部分
     1.Ashenefelter, O. and J. Heckman(1974), “The Estimation of Income and Substitution Effect in a Model of Family Labor Supply,”Econometrica, Vol. 42, pp.73-85.
     2.Atkinson, A. and J. Stigliz(1980), “Household Decisions, Income Taxation and Labour Supply,” Lectures on Public Economics, McGraw-Hall, England, pp. 23-61.
     3.Battarai, K. and J. Whalley(1997), “Discreteness and the Welfare Cost of Labor Supply Tax Distortions,” NBER Working Paper 6280, National Bureau of Economic Research.
     4.Bowen, W. and T. Finegan(1965), “Labor Force Participation and Unemployment” in A. Ross, eds., Employment Policy and the Labor Market, Berkely, California University Press, pp.115-161.
     5.Brown, C. V.(1981), Taxation and Labor Supply, London, George Allen and Unwin..
     6.Burtless, G. and J. Hausman(1978), “The Effect of Taxation on Labor Supply : evaluation the Gray negative income tax experiment,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol.74, No.2, pp.242-248.
     7.Colombino, U. and D. Del Boca(1990), “The Effect of Taxes on Labor Supply in Italy,” Journal of Human Resources, Vol.25, No.3, pp.390-414.
     8.Eduardo Pontual Ribeiro and Jane H. Leuthold(1999), “Preference Structures and the Excess Burden of Income Taxes in Brazil,” Public Finance Review, Vol.27, No.3, pp.243-261.
     9.Hall, R.(1973), “Wage, Income, and Hours of Work in the U.S. Labor Force” in Cain and Watts, eds., Income Maintenance and Labor Supply, Chicago : University Press.
     10.Hausman, J.(1979), “The Econometrics of Labor Supply on Convex Budget Sets,” Economics Letters 3.
     11._________(1981a), “Labor Supply” in : H. Aaron and H. Pechman, eds., How Taxes Effect Economic Activity, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
     12._________(1981b), “Exact Consumers’ Surplus and Deadweight Loss,” American Economic Review, Vol.71.
     13._________, and Rudd P.(1984), “Family Labor Supply with Taxes,” American Economic Review, Vol.74.
     14._________(1983), “Taxes and Labor Supply,” NBER Working Paper No.1102, National Bureau of Economic Research.
     15._________(1985), “Taxes and Labor Supply” in : A. J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein, eds., Handbook of Public Economics, Vol.1, pp.213-263, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
     16.Paker, J. and L. Shaw(1968), “Labor Force Participation in Metropolitan Areas,” Southern Economic Journal, Vol.34, No.3, pp.31-44.
     17.Tella, A. D. Tella and C. Green(1971), The Hours of Work and Family Income Response to Negative Income Tax Plans, Michigan: Upjohn Institute.
     18.Von Soest, A., I. Woittiez, A. Kapteyn(1990), “Labor Supply, Income Taxes, and Hours Restriction in the Netherlands,” Journal of Human Resources, Vol.25, No.3, pp.517-558.
     19.Wales, T. and A. Woodland(1976), “Estimation of Household Utility Function and Labor Supply Response,” International Economic Review, Vol.17, No.2, pp.397-410.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
87255011
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001841
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林全zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 許穎心zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 許穎心zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2000en_US
dc.date.accessioned 31-Mar-2016 15:32:14 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 31-Mar-2016 15:32:14 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 31-Mar-2016 15:32:14 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) A2002001841en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/83272-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財政學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 87255011zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究根據Housman(1981)的實證方式,對我國現行所得稅制對男性經濟戶長之勞動供給影響進行迴歸分析,進而估計目前我國所得稅制度下,個人的最適勞動供給曲線,並求算在此一勞動供給曲線下,所得稅對不同納稅人所造成的無謂損失(分別以高所得階層及中低所得階層代表性個人加以計算)。
     利用民國八十七年「人力資源調查」所做出的實證結果發現,稅後工資率與非勞動所得的變動,對勞動工時皆有相當顯著的解釋能力。其中稅後工資率的係數符號為正,表示當工資上升,休閒相對價格提高,故個人會減少休閒,而勞動工時會相對增加;非勞動工時的係數符號為負,表示休閒為正常財,個人會隨所得提高而增加休閒時間,故勞動工時會相對減少,而比較二者的效果,非勞動所得變動對勞動工時的影響,較稅後工資率變動對勞動工時的影響為大。同時,累進所得稅對勞動供給所造成的無謂損失,無論在絕對量或相對於稅前總所得的比例,皆隨總所得的提高而增加,因此所得稅對高所得者效率上的衝擊較低所得者來得大,亦即所得稅扭曲高所得者的勞動供給行為之程度,較低所得者的扭曲程度為大。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 封面頁
     證明書
     致謝詞
     論文摘要
     目錄
     圖目錄
     表目錄
     第一章 緒論
     第一節 研究動機與目的
     第二節 研究方法與資料限制
     第三節 本文架構
     第二章 文獻回顧
     第一節 古典理論
     第二節 新古典的家庭勞動供給模型
     第三節 累進所得稅制
     第四節 其他相關文獻
     第三章 理論模型與實證方法
     第一節 理論模型
     第二節 實證方法
     第四章 實證結果
     第一節 設算非勞動所得
     第二節 估計勞動供給曲線
     第三節 計算無謂損失
     第五章 結論及建議
     參考文獻
zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001841en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 勞動供給zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 綜合所得稅zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 無謂損失zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 累進所得稅zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 超額負擔zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) labor supplyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) income taxen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) dead weight lossen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) progressive income taxen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) excess burdenen_US
dc.title (題名) 勞動供給、所得稅與超額負擔-台灣的實證研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分
     1.陳圳忠(1989),大小家庭結構對已婚婦女勞動供給的影響,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
     2.梁正德(1986),所得稅與勞動供給,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
     3.單驥(1988),我國小家庭夫婦勞動供給之決定-兼論所得稅的影響,經濟論文,No.16.2,pp.251-267。
     4.張慶輝(1982),台灣勞動參與與勞動供給之研究,勞工行政委託研究叢書,行政院勞工委員會。
     5.______(1982),所得稅、家計生產與勞動供給,財稅研究,No.14.5,pp.9-21。
     6.______(1991),我國勞動工給與勞動參與之研究,台北國科會。
     英文部分
     1.Ashenefelter, O. and J. Heckman(1974), “The Estimation of Income and Substitution Effect in a Model of Family Labor Supply,”Econometrica, Vol. 42, pp.73-85.
     2.Atkinson, A. and J. Stigliz(1980), “Household Decisions, Income Taxation and Labour Supply,” Lectures on Public Economics, McGraw-Hall, England, pp. 23-61.
     3.Battarai, K. and J. Whalley(1997), “Discreteness and the Welfare Cost of Labor Supply Tax Distortions,” NBER Working Paper 6280, National Bureau of Economic Research.
     4.Bowen, W. and T. Finegan(1965), “Labor Force Participation and Unemployment” in A. Ross, eds., Employment Policy and the Labor Market, Berkely, California University Press, pp.115-161.
     5.Brown, C. V.(1981), Taxation and Labor Supply, London, George Allen and Unwin..
     6.Burtless, G. and J. Hausman(1978), “The Effect of Taxation on Labor Supply : evaluation the Gray negative income tax experiment,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol.74, No.2, pp.242-248.
     7.Colombino, U. and D. Del Boca(1990), “The Effect of Taxes on Labor Supply in Italy,” Journal of Human Resources, Vol.25, No.3, pp.390-414.
     8.Eduardo Pontual Ribeiro and Jane H. Leuthold(1999), “Preference Structures and the Excess Burden of Income Taxes in Brazil,” Public Finance Review, Vol.27, No.3, pp.243-261.
     9.Hall, R.(1973), “Wage, Income, and Hours of Work in the U.S. Labor Force” in Cain and Watts, eds., Income Maintenance and Labor Supply, Chicago : University Press.
     10.Hausman, J.(1979), “The Econometrics of Labor Supply on Convex Budget Sets,” Economics Letters 3.
     11._________(1981a), “Labor Supply” in : H. Aaron and H. Pechman, eds., How Taxes Effect Economic Activity, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
     12._________(1981b), “Exact Consumers’ Surplus and Deadweight Loss,” American Economic Review, Vol.71.
     13._________, and Rudd P.(1984), “Family Labor Supply with Taxes,” American Economic Review, Vol.74.
     14._________(1983), “Taxes and Labor Supply,” NBER Working Paper No.1102, National Bureau of Economic Research.
     15._________(1985), “Taxes and Labor Supply” in : A. J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein, eds., Handbook of Public Economics, Vol.1, pp.213-263, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
     16.Paker, J. and L. Shaw(1968), “Labor Force Participation in Metropolitan Areas,” Southern Economic Journal, Vol.34, No.3, pp.31-44.
     17.Tella, A. D. Tella and C. Green(1971), The Hours of Work and Family Income Response to Negative Income Tax Plans, Michigan: Upjohn Institute.
     18.Von Soest, A., I. Woittiez, A. Kapteyn(1990), “Labor Supply, Income Taxes, and Hours Restriction in the Netherlands,” Journal of Human Resources, Vol.25, No.3, pp.517-558.
     19.Wales, T. and A. Woodland(1976), “Estimation of Household Utility Function and Labor Supply Response,” International Economic Review, Vol.17, No.2, pp.397-410.
zh_TW