| dc.contributor | 中國文學系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 陳逢源 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2012 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 11-Apr-2016 17:10:27 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 11-Apr-2016 17:10:27 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 11-Apr-2016 17:10:27 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/84127 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 四書成為經典，有賴朱熹完成《四書章句集注》，但就影響層面而言，明代科舉定制才是四書「官學化」發展最重要推手，尤其明成祖敕撰《四書大全》，挾其皇權威勢，一改士人成學方式，四書先於五經，成為儒學的核心所在。檢覈其中，刊落歧異，整合前說，形成朱熹、門人、元儒一系相承的經說體系，建構朱熹昂然挺出的宗主地位，內容承襲倪士毅《四書輯釋》為多，但實際比對內容，改動增補之處，重構脈絡，一窺建構體系的訴求。只是《四書大全》一方面從新安一系承繼元儒注解四書的成果，但另一方面也回應新安一系學人與饒魯一系爭奪詮釋朱學宗主地位的主張，宋元之際，學脈日分，由學脈、宗派而及於宗族情懷，轉為捍衛朱熹學術的信念，成為《四書大全》最核心的訴求，細節之間，必須進一步釐清元儒四書詮釋的學術系譜，以及朱熹以下複雜的四書傳衍過程，元儒著作多已亡佚，線索模糊，於今重加整理，比對其中，期以有更清楚的觀察。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Zhu Xi’s work, The Exegesis of the Collections of Texts from the Four Books (Sishu zhangju jizhu), made the Four Books become canons, while the establishment of the official examination system in Ming Dynasty was the main cause of officializing the Four Books. Above all, Yongle Emperor (Chengzu of Ming Dynasty) decreed to compile Encyclopaedia of the Four Books. With the imperial authority, scholars changed their way of pursuing studies when the Four Books transcended the Five Classics and became the core of the Confucian Philosophy. Basing on the substitution of canons, the derived system of classic from Zhu Xi, his disciples, to Yuan scholars construct Zhu’s predominant position. Encyclopaedia of the Four Books mostly continued and succeeded Ni Shi-Yi’s Collected Annotation of the Four Books. However, through comparing the contents as well as the additions and deletions in these two works, I reconstruct the context and find out the object of the system of construction. On one hand, Encyclopaedia of the Four Books passed on the achievement of Yuan scholars’ annotation in Xinan system, and on the other hand, it responded Xinan scholars’ argument which contended against Raolu system in order to get the predominant position of interpreting Zhu’s study. In the connection between Song and Yuan, threads of schools have divided increasingly, and then threads of schools, sects, and affections of clan were all transformed into a belief of defending Zhu’s study, which was the central object of Encyclopaedia of the Four Books. Here I must go one step further to make the academic pedigree of Yuan scholars’ interpretation of the Four Books and the complex process of inheritance clean because many Yuan scholars’ works were lost and the clue was indistinct. In order to achieve this goal, I will reorganize the documents and compare the texts in this paper. | |
| dc.format.extent | 1278997 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 計畫編號 NSC101-2410-H004-107-MY2 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 朱熹;四書;四書大全;理學;元儒 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Zhu Xi;The Four Books;Encyclopaedia of the Four Books;The Philosophy of Principle (lixue);Yuan Scholars | |
| dc.title (題名) | 從學脈、宗派到宗族──《四書大全》徵引元儒之學術系譜考察 | zh_TW |
| dc.title.alternative (其他題名) | From Thread of Schools, Sects, to Clans—Survey of the Academic Pedigree of Yuan Scholars in Encyclopaedia of the Four Books | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
