學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 中文情態詞「會」之語意分析
Semantic Analysis on the Modal Verb HUI in Mandarin Chinese作者 張清秀
Tracy Chang, Ching-Hsiu貢獻者 賴惠玲
Lai, Huei-Ling
張清秀
Tracy Chang, Ching-Hsiu關鍵詞 情態詞
語意學
運符
語意中心
情態動詞
語意關連性
會
modality
modal verb
monosemy view
semantics
operator
semantic relatedness日期 2001 上傳時間 15-四月-2016 15:57:55 (UTC+8) 摘要 情態動詞「會」在前人的研究當中，具有許多不同的功能，例如表能力、表預知、表一般特性等不同的功能。本論文採用Monosemy View，認為「會」在語言表面上所呈現出之不同用法，並不是武斷毫無關係的，而是存在著非常密切的語意關連性。再者，透過此觀點，我們希望嘗試找出這些不同功能之間的語意關係。本研究提出三個假設如下：第一，情態動詞「會」有一個語意核心，表說話者對於句子命題的體現(realization)，有著非常高的把握；第二，情態動詞「會」在句子裡擔任一個運符(operator)的角色，其作用是將說話者對此句子的語態加諸在此句子之上；第三，本篇論文提出「會」所呈現出許多不同的功能，是經由情態動詞與句子之情態內容所交互作用的結果。
Carrying multiple functions--such as ability, prediction and generic--the modal verb hui in Mandarin Chinese has been extensively studied by previous researchers. This thesis, following the monosemy view, claims that the various functions of hui are not arbitrary, but closely related to one another. To account for the correlation between the various functions of hui, this thesis proposes three hypotheses. First, hui denotes assurance, indicating that the speaker’s attitude towards the realization of the propositional content is full of high assurance. Secondly, hui functions as an OPERATOR of the proposition denoted by the sentence. Thirdly, hui`s multiple functions are context-derived. This thesis maintains that it is the interaction between the modal verb hui and the sentence’s proposition that results in the different functions carried by hui.參考文獻 Brennan, Virginai. 1997. “Quantificational Modals.” Linguistic Inquiry 28: 165-169. Bybee, J and Suzanne Fleischman. 1995. “Modality in Grammar and Discourse: An Introductory Essay.” In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. J. Bybee and S. Fleischman, 1-14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca, and Revere D. Perkins. 1991. “Back to the Future.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization Vol. II, ed. Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Bernd Heine, 17-58. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ---. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality In the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Carlson, Gregory N. and Francis Jeffry Pelletier. 1995. The Generic Book. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Chang, Yungli. 2000. “Xian Zai Han Yu Qing Tai Ci Hui De Duo Yi Xian Xiang.” Paper presented at ICCL-9, Singapore. Chung, S. & Timberlake, A. 1985. “Tense, Aspect, and Mood.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, ed. T. Shopen, 202-259. Cambridge: Cambridge. Coates, J. 1995. “The Expression of Root and Epistemic Possibility in English.” In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. J. Bybee and S. Fleischman, 55-66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Fleischman, S. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence From Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gao, Yung-den. 高永德. 1981. A Semantic Study of Four Modal Verbs In Mandarin Chinese: With Special Reference to Their Interaction With Aspectual Nature of Verbs. M.A. Thesis, Fu Jen Catholic University. Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” Cole & Morgan 41-58. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi and Friederike Hunnermeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Heine, Bernd. 1995. “Agent-Oriented vs. Epistemic Modality: Some Observations on German Modals.” In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. J. Bybee and S. Fleischman, 17-53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Hofmann, Th. R. 1993. Realms of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantics. London & New York: Longman. Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. New York: Cambridge University Press. Hsin, Aili. 1999. Modality in Taiwan Southern Min. Ph. D. dissertation. National Tsing Hua University. Hsu, Rei-Fen. 1993. Taiwanese Modality. M.A. Thesis, National Tsing Hua University. Huang, Yu-Chun. 黃郁純. 1999. A Semantic Study of Modal Verbs in Chinese. M.A. Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University. Klinge, Alex. 1993. “The English Modal Auxiliaries: From Lexical Semantics to Utterance Interpretation.” Journal of Linguistics 29:315-357. Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. “The Notional Category of Modality.” In Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics, ed. Hans Jurgen Eikmeyer and Hannes Rieser, 38-74. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ---. 1991. “Modality.” In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, ed. Arnim von Stechow and dieter Wunderlich, 825-834. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1982. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Taipei: The Crane Publishing. Lin, Cai-yun. 林彩雲. 1995. The So-called Chinese Modals. M.A. Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University. Lin, J.W. (林若望) and J. C. C. Tang (湯志真). 1995. “Modals as Verbs in Chinese: A GB Perspective.” Collection of Sinica Academia 66:53-105. Lu, Shu-xiang. 1983. Xian Dai Han Yu Ba Bai Ci. Hong Kong: Shang Wu Yin Shu Guan. Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. P. Palmer, F. R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. P. ---. 1990. Modality and the English Modals. Longman: London and New York. Papafragou, Anna. 2000. Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: New York. Saeed, John I. 1997. Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Press. Sanders, Robert M. 1992. “The Expressions of Modality in Peking and Taipei Mandarin.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics 20: 289-314. Sweetser, Eve. 1986. “Polysemy vs. Abstraction: Mutaully Exclusive or Complementary?” BLS 12: 528-538. ---. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Talmy, Leonard. 1981. “Force Dynamics.” Paper presented at the conference on Language and Mental Imagery, May 1981, University of California at Berkeley. ---. 1988. “Force dynamics in language and cognition.” Cognitive Science 2: 49-100. Tang, Ting-chi. 1979. Studies in Chinese Syntax. Taipei: Student Book Co. Ltd. Tang, Ting-chi, and Chih-Chen Jane Tang. 1997. “Han Yu Qing Tai Ci Xu Lun.” Di Wu Jie Shi Jie Hua Yu Wu Jiao Xue Yan Tao Hui Lu Wen Ji. 177-197. Taipei: Shi Jie Hua Wen. Traugott, Elizabeth. 1989. “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.” Language 65: 31-55. Wu, Zhao-Jing. 吳妱靜. 1996. Mood in Mandarin Chinese: Affirmative Modal Markers hui and le. M.A. Thesis, Fu Jen Catholic University. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
87555001資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001001 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 賴惠玲 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Lai, Huei-Ling en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 張清秀 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Tracy Chang, Ching-Hsiu en_US dc.creator (作者) 張清秀 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Tracy Chang, Ching-Hsiu en_US dc.date (日期) 2001 en_US dc.date.accessioned 15-四月-2016 15:57:55 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 15-四月-2016 15:57:55 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 15-四月-2016 15:57:55 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) A2002001001 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/84814 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 語言學研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 87555001 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 情態動詞「會」在前人的研究當中，具有許多不同的功能，例如表能力、表預知、表一般特性等不同的功能。本論文採用Monosemy View，認為「會」在語言表面上所呈現出之不同用法，並不是武斷毫無關係的，而是存在著非常密切的語意關連性。再者，透過此觀點，我們希望嘗試找出這些不同功能之間的語意關係。本研究提出三個假設如下：第一，情態動詞「會」有一個語意核心，表說話者對於句子命題的體現(realization)，有著非常高的把握；第二，情態動詞「會」在句子裡擔任一個運符(operator)的角色，其作用是將說話者對此句子的語態加諸在此句子之上；第三，本篇論文提出「會」所呈現出許多不同的功能，是經由情態動詞與句子之情態內容所交互作用的結果。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Carrying multiple functions--such as ability, prediction and generic--the modal verb hui in Mandarin Chinese has been extensively studied by previous researchers. This thesis, following the monosemy view, claims that the various functions of hui are not arbitrary, but closely related to one another. To account for the correlation between the various functions of hui, this thesis proposes three hypotheses. First, hui denotes assurance, indicating that the speaker’s attitude towards the realization of the propositional content is full of high assurance. Secondly, hui functions as an OPERATOR of the proposition denoted by the sentence. Thirdly, hui`s multiple functions are context-derived. This thesis maintains that it is the interaction between the modal verb hui and the sentence’s proposition that results in the different functions carried by hui. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 封面頁 證明書 Acknowledgments(誌謝) TABLE OF CONTENTS(目錄) Chinese Abstract English Abstract Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 What Is Modality? 1.2 Motivation and Purpose 1.3 Organization of the Thesis Chapter 2 Previous Analyses 2.1 Tang (1979) 2.2 Gao (1981) 2.3 Wu (1996) 2.4 Huang (1999) 2.5 Chang (2000) 2.6 Some Remarks Chapter 3 Theoretical Frameworks 3.1 Some Assumptions 3.2 Three Approaches on Modality 3.2.1 The Ambiguity View 3.2.2 The Polysemy View 3.2.3 The Monosemy View 3.3 The Monosemy Perspective：Previous Studies 3.3.1 Sweetser (1986) 3.3.2 Klinge (1993) 3.3.3 Brennan (1997) 3.4 Concluding Remarks Chapter 4 The Analysis on Hui 4.1 Hypotheses 4.1.1 The Speaker’s Assurance as the Core Meaning of Hui 4.1.2 Hui Functions as an OPERATOR 4.1.3 Context-derived Functions of Hui 4.2 The Realization of Hui’s Multi-Functions 4.2.1 Function of Ability 4.2.2 Function of Prediction 4.2.3 Function of Generic 4.2.3.1 What Is Genericity 4.2.3.2 Natural Law 4.2.3.3 Habitual Activity 4.2.3.4 General Characteristic 4.2.4 Negation and Contrary-to-expectation 4.3 Summary Chapter 5 Conclusion References zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001001 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 情態詞 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 語意學 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 運符 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 語意中心 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 情態動詞 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 語意關連性 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 會 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) modality en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) modal verb en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) monosemy view en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) semantics en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) operator en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) semantic relatedness en_US dc.title (題名) 中文情態詞「會」之語意分析 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Semantic Analysis on the Modal Verb HUI in Mandarin Chinese en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brennan, Virginai. 1997. “Quantificational Modals.” Linguistic Inquiry 28: 165-169. Bybee, J and Suzanne Fleischman. 1995. “Modality in Grammar and Discourse: An Introductory Essay.” In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. J. Bybee and S. Fleischman, 1-14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca, and Revere D. Perkins. 1991. “Back to the Future.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization Vol. II, ed. Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Bernd Heine, 17-58. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ---. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality In the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Carlson, Gregory N. and Francis Jeffry Pelletier. 1995. The Generic Book. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Chang, Yungli. 2000. “Xian Zai Han Yu Qing Tai Ci Hui De Duo Yi Xian Xiang.” Paper presented at ICCL-9, Singapore. Chung, S. & Timberlake, A. 1985. “Tense, Aspect, and Mood.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, ed. T. Shopen, 202-259. Cambridge: Cambridge. Coates, J. 1995. “The Expression of Root and Epistemic Possibility in English.” In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. J. Bybee and S. Fleischman, 55-66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Fleischman, S. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence From Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gao, Yung-den. 高永德. 1981. A Semantic Study of Four Modal Verbs In Mandarin Chinese: With Special Reference to Their Interaction With Aspectual Nature of Verbs. M.A. Thesis, Fu Jen Catholic University. Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” Cole & Morgan 41-58. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi and Friederike Hunnermeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Heine, Bernd. 1995. “Agent-Oriented vs. Epistemic Modality: Some Observations on German Modals.” In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. J. Bybee and S. Fleischman, 17-53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Hofmann, Th. R. 1993. Realms of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantics. London & New York: Longman. Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. New York: Cambridge University Press. Hsin, Aili. 1999. Modality in Taiwan Southern Min. Ph. D. dissertation. National Tsing Hua University. Hsu, Rei-Fen. 1993. Taiwanese Modality. M.A. Thesis, National Tsing Hua University. Huang, Yu-Chun. 黃郁純. 1999. A Semantic Study of Modal Verbs in Chinese. M.A. Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University. Klinge, Alex. 1993. “The English Modal Auxiliaries: From Lexical Semantics to Utterance Interpretation.” Journal of Linguistics 29:315-357. Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. “The Notional Category of Modality.” In Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics, ed. Hans Jurgen Eikmeyer and Hannes Rieser, 38-74. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ---. 1991. “Modality.” In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, ed. Arnim von Stechow and dieter Wunderlich, 825-834. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1982. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Taipei: The Crane Publishing. Lin, Cai-yun. 林彩雲. 1995. The So-called Chinese Modals. M.A. Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University. Lin, J.W. (林若望) and J. C. C. Tang (湯志真). 1995. “Modals as Verbs in Chinese: A GB Perspective.” Collection of Sinica Academia 66:53-105. Lu, Shu-xiang. 1983. Xian Dai Han Yu Ba Bai Ci. Hong Kong: Shang Wu Yin Shu Guan. Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. P. Palmer, F. R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. P. ---. 1990. Modality and the English Modals. Longman: London and New York. Papafragou, Anna. 2000. Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: New York. Saeed, John I. 1997. Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Press. Sanders, Robert M. 1992. “The Expressions of Modality in Peking and Taipei Mandarin.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics 20: 289-314. Sweetser, Eve. 1986. “Polysemy vs. Abstraction: Mutaully Exclusive or Complementary?” BLS 12: 528-538. ---. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Talmy, Leonard. 1981. “Force Dynamics.” Paper presented at the conference on Language and Mental Imagery, May 1981, University of California at Berkeley. ---. 1988. “Force dynamics in language and cognition.” Cognitive Science 2: 49-100. Tang, Ting-chi. 1979. Studies in Chinese Syntax. Taipei: Student Book Co. Ltd. Tang, Ting-chi, and Chih-Chen Jane Tang. 1997. “Han Yu Qing Tai Ci Xu Lun.” Di Wu Jie Shi Jie Hua Yu Wu Jiao Xue Yan Tao Hui Lu Wen Ji. 177-197. Taipei: Shi Jie Hua Wen. Traugott, Elizabeth. 1989. “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.” Language 65: 31-55. Wu, Zhao-Jing. 吳妱靜. 1996. Mood in Mandarin Chinese: Affirmative Modal Markers hui and le. M.A. Thesis, Fu Jen Catholic University. zh_TW
