學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 環境污染防制之最適競爭策略－以『演化性賽局』分析 作者 林子渝 貢獻者 何靜□
林子渝關鍵詞 環境污染防制
演化性賽局日期 2001 上傳時間 15-Apr-2016 16:05:35 (UTC+8) 摘要 本文主要探討廠商在進行生產活動而使用共同資源時，其所採取之防制策略及其市場均衡。以兩廠模型的賽局分析開始，分別假設防制投入與防制成效成固定關係與成正向關係。在防制投入與防制成效成固定關係下，探討廠商對於防制污染所採取的競爭策略和政府之污染稅政策是否有效；在防制投入與防制成效成正向關係下，分析廠商之間「只對總防制投入達成協議」、「對總產量與總防制投入都達成協議」之兩種勾結合作方式下，其防制污染策略及其均衡情形的不同。最後引進市場上存在有限數目多家廠商的演化性賽局模型，分析有防制污染投入與沒有防制污染投入這兩類廠商的家數比例如何隨時間而變動，並比較單期賽局之均衡與動態分析之長期均衡。 參考文獻 張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏（1995），經濟學－理論與實際，翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。 Amir M. and Berninghaus K. (1996), “Another Approach to Mutation and Learning in Games”, Games and Economic Behavior, 14, 19-43. Anderson and P. Francois (1997) “Environmental Cleanliness as a Public Good : Welfare and Policy Implications of Nonconvex Preferences” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 34,256-274. Chao, C. and Yu, E. (1998), “Pollution and foreign-investment taxes”, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 7(1), 71-85. Coase (1960), “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and economics. Damania R. (2000), “Financial structure and the effectiveness of pollution control in an oligopolistic industry”, Resource and Energy Economics, 22, 21-36. Dasgupta (1993), “An inquiry into well-being and destitution”, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fredriksson P.G. (1997), “The Political Economics of Pollution Taxes in a Small Open Economy”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33, 44-58. Gaskins, D.W. and Weyant, J.P. (1993), “Model comparisons of the costs of reducing CO emissions”, American Economic Review, 83, 318-323. Gaskins, D.W. and Weyant,J.P. (1994), “Reducing carbons dioxide emissions: Costs and policy options ”, Energy Modeling Forum report 12 (Stanford University, Stanford, CA). Gordon H.S.（1954）, “The economic theory of a common property resource: The fishery”, Journal of Political Economics, 16, 124-142. Hammitt, J.K. and Adams, J.L. (1996), “The value of international cooperation for abating global climate change”, Resource and Energy Economics, 18, 219-241. Hardin, Garrett. (1968), “The Tragedy of the Commons”, Science, 162, 1243-1248. Huber, C. and Wirl, F. (1998), “The Polluter Pays versus the Pollutee Pays Principle under Asymmetric Information”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 35, 69-87. Kremer, M. & Olken, B. (2001), “A Biological Model of Unions ”, NBER Working Paper W8257. Manne,A., Mendelsohn R. and Richels R.（1995）, “MERGE: A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies”, Energy Policy, 23, 17-34. Ostrom (1990), Governing the Commons, Cambridge University Press, 1-28. Parryy, I. (1995), “Pollution Taxes and Revenue Recycling”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(3), s64-77. Peck, S.C. and Teisberg, T.J. (1995), “International CO emissions control: An analysis using CETA ”, Energy Policy, 23, 297-308. Pigou, A. C. (1932), The Economics of Welfare, London:MACMILLAN. Schob, R. (1997), “Environmental Taxes and Pre-existing Distortions: The Normalization Trap”, International Tax and Public Finance, 4(2), 167-176. Somanathan E. and Sethi, R. (1996), “The Evolutionary of Social Norms in Common Property Resource Use ”, The American Economic Review, 86(4), 766-788. Sundholm W.H. (1998), “An Evolutionary Approach to Congestion”, MIT Press. Weibull J. W. (1995), Evolutionary Game Theory, MIT Press. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
88258011資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001230 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 何靜□ zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林子渝 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 林子渝 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2001 en_US dc.date.accessioned 15-Apr-2016 16:05:35 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 15-Apr-2016 16:05:35 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 15-Apr-2016 16:05:35 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) A2002001230 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/85020 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 經濟學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 88258011 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文主要探討廠商在進行生產活動而使用共同資源時，其所採取之防制策略及其市場均衡。以兩廠模型的賽局分析開始，分別假設防制投入與防制成效成固定關係與成正向關係。在防制投入與防制成效成固定關係下，探討廠商對於防制污染所採取的競爭策略和政府之污染稅政策是否有效；在防制投入與防制成效成正向關係下，分析廠商之間「只對總防制投入達成協議」、「對總產量與總防制投入都達成協議」之兩種勾結合作方式下，其防制污染策略及其均衡情形的不同。最後引進市場上存在有限數目多家廠商的演化性賽局模型，分析有防制污染投入與沒有防制污染投入這兩類廠商的家數比例如何隨時間而變動，並比較單期賽局之均衡與動態分析之長期均衡。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 封面頁 證明書 致謝詞 論文摘要 目錄 圖表目錄 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的 第二節 文獻回顧與探討 第二章 寡佔市場之防制污染模型—廠商之防制污染投入與防制污染成效成固定關係 第一節 共同資源開放自由使用 第二節 政策干預 附錄2.1 第三章 寡佔市場之防制污染模型—廠商之防制污染投入與防制污染成效成正向關係 第一節 廠商之間對於總防制污染投入達成協議 第二節 廠商之間對於總產量與總防制污染投入達成協議 附錄3.1 第四章 防制污染之動態分析 第一節 共同資源開放自由使用 第二節 政策干預 附錄4.1 第五章 結論 參考文獻 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001230 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 環境污染防制 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 演化性賽局 zh_TW dc.title (題名) 環境污染防制之最適競爭策略－以『演化性賽局』分析 zh_TW dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏（1995），經濟學－理論與實際，翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。 Amir M. and Berninghaus K. (1996), “Another Approach to Mutation and Learning in Games”, Games and Economic Behavior, 14, 19-43. Anderson and P. Francois (1997) “Environmental Cleanliness as a Public Good : Welfare and Policy Implications of Nonconvex Preferences” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 34,256-274. Chao, C. and Yu, E. (1998), “Pollution and foreign-investment taxes”, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 7(1), 71-85. Coase (1960), “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and economics. Damania R. (2000), “Financial structure and the effectiveness of pollution control in an oligopolistic industry”, Resource and Energy Economics, 22, 21-36. Dasgupta (1993), “An inquiry into well-being and destitution”, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fredriksson P.G. (1997), “The Political Economics of Pollution Taxes in a Small Open Economy”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33, 44-58. Gaskins, D.W. and Weyant, J.P. (1993), “Model comparisons of the costs of reducing CO emissions”, American Economic Review, 83, 318-323. Gaskins, D.W. and Weyant,J.P. (1994), “Reducing carbons dioxide emissions: Costs and policy options ”, Energy Modeling Forum report 12 (Stanford University, Stanford, CA). Gordon H.S.（1954）, “The economic theory of a common property resource: The fishery”, Journal of Political Economics, 16, 124-142. Hammitt, J.K. and Adams, J.L. (1996), “The value of international cooperation for abating global climate change”, Resource and Energy Economics, 18, 219-241. Hardin, Garrett. (1968), “The Tragedy of the Commons”, Science, 162, 1243-1248. Huber, C. and Wirl, F. (1998), “The Polluter Pays versus the Pollutee Pays Principle under Asymmetric Information”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 35, 69-87. Kremer, M. & Olken, B. (2001), “A Biological Model of Unions ”, NBER Working Paper W8257. Manne,A., Mendelsohn R. and Richels R.（1995）, “MERGE: A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies”, Energy Policy, 23, 17-34. Ostrom (1990), Governing the Commons, Cambridge University Press, 1-28. Parryy, I. (1995), “Pollution Taxes and Revenue Recycling”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(3), s64-77. Peck, S.C. and Teisberg, T.J. (1995), “International CO emissions control: An analysis using CETA ”, Energy Policy, 23, 297-308. Pigou, A. C. (1932), The Economics of Welfare, London:MACMILLAN. Schob, R. (1997), “Environmental Taxes and Pre-existing Distortions: The Normalization Trap”, International Tax and Public Finance, 4(2), 167-176. Somanathan E. and Sethi, R. (1996), “The Evolutionary of Social Norms in Common Property Resource Use ”, The American Economic Review, 86(4), 766-788. Sundholm W.H. (1998), “An Evolutionary Approach to Congestion”, MIT Press. Weibull J. W. (1995), Evolutionary Game Theory, MIT Press. zh_TW
