1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 盧梭論腐化、德行與政治共同體之重建
Rousseau on Corruption, Virtue and the Reconstruction of Political Community
作者 謝政達
Hsieh, Cheng-Da
貢獻者 蕭高彥
謝政達
Hsieh, Cheng-Da
關鍵詞 盧梭
腐化
德行
公民共和主義
財產
私愛之心
社會契約
立法家
普遍意志
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
corruption
virtue
civic republicanism
property
amour propre
social contract
legislator
general will
日期 2000
上傳時間 18-Apr-2016 16:33:02 (UTC+8)
摘要 盧梭的思想內涵豐富，不同學者由於關切的焦點不同，其所研究的主題也各異，例如，有些學者關懷的是盧梭思想在觀念史上的定位與影響，另外有些學者則是關心盧梭思想中的民主或極權成分，但是關於盧梭思想中公民共和主義的要素，則少有人提及。因此，本文的主要論旨即是從公民共和主義的核心觀念──腐化與德行此一角度切入，分析其政治思想。
     根據此一研究主軸，本文第二章探討的是盧梭思想中的腐化意涵、腐化的歷程，以及造成腐化的各種因素，並將腐化的現象區分成政治腐化與和財產相關的社會腐化。面對這些腐化現象，盧梭是以德行作為對治之道，一方面以德行為標準批判當時政治、社會的腐化，另一方面則是以德行作為理想政治共同體重建的基礎。盧梭的這些想法似乎是深受古典共和主義思想家，以及古斯巴達與羅馬兩共和國影響。關於盧梭德行觀將在本文第三章探討。
     以德行為基礎的政治共同體重建，將可在盧梭的社會契約理論，以及盧梭為其他國家草擬憲法、改革政制的著作中獲得印證。社會契約接櫫了理想政治共同體的原型，而社會契約的締結與維繫則有賴一位卓然出眾的立法家，他一方面轉化、消除造成腐化的種種因素，另一方面則創造培育德行的環境，使「德行共和國」的理想得以實現。
     然而並非所有思想家對腐化的思考方向都和盧梭相同，孟德斯鳩與康士坦都提出和盧梭相異的思考，本文最後將探討這些思想家和盧梭思想的差異之處。
The essence of Rousseau‘s thought is rich. A wide variety of focuses are thus occurred due to various scholar’s different concerns. Their research subjects are different too. For example, some scholars concern the position and influence of Rousseau’s thought on the idea of history, while others concern the components of democracy and authoritarianism of his thought. Nevertheless, the concerning of the elements of Rousseau’s thought on civic republicanism is not very prevailing. The main purpose of this thesis is from the core concept of civic republicanism, i.e., corruption and virtue, to analyze Rousseau’s political thought.
     Based on this research core, the second chapter of this thesis discusses the meaning of corruption, its process and the factors in causing corruption, as well as to divide the phenomena of corruption into political corruption and social corruption which is relevant to property. Rousseau dealt these corrupt phenomena with virtue. One the one hand, he applied virtue as the standard to criticize the contemporary political and social corruption. On the other hand, he applied virtue as the foundation to reconstruct ideal political community. The thought of Rousseau seems to be influenced by the classical republicanism thinkers and the two ancient Republic, i. e., Sparta and Rome Republic. Rousseau’s view toward virtue will be discussed in the third chapter of this thesis.
     The foundation of reconstructing political community by virtue will be found in Rousseau’s theory of social contract and to be proved in Rousseau’s drafting the manuscript of constitution reform policy for other states. Social contract reveals the stereotype of ideal political community, however, the binding and the maintaining of social contract depends on an outstanding legislator. On the one hand, he transforms and eliminates the various factors of corruption formation. On the other hand, he creates the various environment of virtue cultivation, enforcing the “Republic of virtue” to be realized.
     Not every thinker’s way of thinking toward corruption is the same with Rousseau. Montesquieu’s and Constant’s thinking are different from Rousseau. The last part of this thesis will discuss the differences among them.
參考文獻 一、原典部份
     盧梭(Jean-Jacques Rousseau)
     Confessions. in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol:5, edited by Christopher Kelly, Roger D. Masters and Peter G. Stillman, University Press of New England, 1995.
     Considerations on the Government of Poland. in Jean Jacques Rousseau: Political Writings, translated and edited by Frederick Watkins, University of Wisconsin Press, 1986.
     Constitutional Project for Corsica. in Jean Jacques Rousseau: Political Writings, translated and edited by Frederick Watkins, University of Wisconsin Press, 1986.
     “Discourse on Political Economy,” in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol: 3, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, University Press of New England, 1992.
     Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality among Men. in Rousseau: The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, edited and translated by Victor Gourevitch, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
     Discourse on the Sciences and Arts. in Rousseau: The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, edited and translated by Victor Gourevitch, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
     “Discourse on the Virtue a Hero Most Needs,” in Rousseau: The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, edited and translated by Victor Gourevitch, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
     Emile. introduction, translation and notes by Allan Bloom, New York: Basic Books.
     Geneva Manuscript. in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol:4, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, University Press of New England, 1994.
     On Social Contract. in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol:4, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, University Press of New England, 1994.
     “Political Fragments,” in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol:4, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, University Press of New England, 1994.
     Politics and Art: Letter to M. D’Alembert on the Theatre, translated with notes and introduction by Allan Bloom. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 1968.
     “Preface to Narcissus,” in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol:2, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, University Press of New England, 1992.
     “State of War,” in Rousseau: The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, edited and translated by Victor Gourevitch, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
     《一個孤獨漫步者的遐想》。袁筱一(譯)，一九九七年，桂林：漓江出版社。
     《社會契約論》。何兆武(譯)，一九八七年，台北：唐山出版社。
     〈科學與藝術的復興是否有助於敦風化俗〉，何兆武(譯)，一九九七年，北京：商務印書館。
     《新愛洛伊絲》。李平漚、何三雅(譯)，一九九六年，台北：林鬱文化事業有限公司。
     《論人類不平等的起源和基礎》。李常山(譯)，一九九七年，北京：商務印書館。
     《愛彌兒：論教育》。李平漚(譯)，一九九六年，北京：商務印書館。
     《盧梭自選書信集》。劉陽(譯)，一九九七年，南京：譯林出版社。
     《盧梭散文選》。李平漚(譯)，一九九五年，天津：百花文藝出版社。
     《懺悔錄》。黎星、范希衡(譯)，一九九八年，北京：人民文學出版社。
     二、其它相關文獻
     (一)中文文獻
     丁詩韻
     1991 《盧梭的自然主義哲學》，台中：私立東海大學哲學研究所碩士論文。托克維爾(TocquevilleAlexis de)著，馮棠(譯)
     1994 《舊制度與大革命》，香港：牛津大學出版社。
     江金太
     1987 《歷史與政治》，台北：桂冠圖書公司。
     江宜樺
     1995 〈政治社群與生命共同體—亞里斯多德城邦理論的若干啟示〉，收錄於江宜樺，陳秀容編，《政治社群》，頁39-75。台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書(38)。
     朱堅章
     1972 〈盧梭政治思想中自由觀念的分析〉，《國立政治大學學報》第二十六期，頁183-205。
     沈清松
     1995 〈盧梭社會契約論的評析：一個奠基性迷思的轉變〉，收錄於張福建、蘇文流(主編)，《民主理論：古典與現代》，頁51-72。台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書(35)。
     吳榮輝
     1986 《盧梭政治理論的研究：民主或極權？》，台北：私立輔仁大學歷史研究所碩士論文。
     杜蘭 (Durant, Will James)著，幼獅翻譯中心編譯
     1978 《盧梭與法國》，台北：幼獅文化公司。
     韋洪武
     1988 《盧梭民主思想之研究》，台北：國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。
     莊志明
     1991 《盧梭思想初探：從自然人權利到社會道德的義務》，台北：國立臺灣大學哲學研究所碩士論文。
     莊國銘
     1997 《德性與政治社群—亞里斯多德城邦理論之研究》，政大政治所碩士論文。
     張少忠
     1976 《盧梭在愛彌中教育思想之研究》，台北：私立中國文化大學法國文學研究所。
     張芝聯(主編)
     1989 《法國通史》，北京：北京大學出版社。
     張福建
     1999 〈在自由主義與共和主義之外：梅迪遜早期憲政思想探索〉，發表於中研院社科所主辦「自由主義」學術研討會。6月25-26日。
     黃素玉
     1988 《盧梭學前教育思想之研究》，台北：國立臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所。
     楊共樂
     1998 《羅馬共和國時期》(下)。北京：商務印書館。
     蔡英文
     1999 〈公民德性、市民社會與主權國家：現代市民社會論述之探討〉，《政治科學論叢》第十期，頁83-112。台北：國立台灣大學政治學系。
     樓繼中
     1995 《盧梭自然教育思想之研究》，台中：私立東海大學哲學研究所。撒路斯提烏斯(C. Sallustius Crispus)著，王以鑄、崔妙因(譯)
     1996 《喀提林陰謀、朱古達戰爭》，北京：商務印書館。
     蕭高彥
     1998 〈盧梭論民主共和主義〉，發表於國科會整合型計畫「民主政治理論專題研究」學術研討會。7月31日。
     1999 〈盧梭論現代政治秩序──一個政治神學的考察〉，發表於中研院社科所主辦「自由主義」學術研討會。6月25-26日。
     (二)英文文獻
     Althuser, Louis
     1982 Politics and History: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Hegel and Marx.Trans.Ben Brewster. London: Verso.
     Aristotle
     1984a Politics. translated, and with an introduction, notes, and glossary by Carnes Lord. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     1984b Aristotle`s Nicomachean Ethics. translation with commentaries and glossary by Hippocrates G. Apostle. Grinnell, Ia.: Peripatetic Press.
     Barnard, F. M.
     1988 Self-Direction and Political Legitimacy: Rousseau and Herder. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University.
     Bartlett, Robert C.
     1994 "The `Realism` of Classical Political Science," American Journal of Political Science, Vol.38, No.2, May 1994:381-402.
     Blum, Carol
     1986 Rousseau and the Republic of Virtue : the Language of Politics in the French Revolution. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.
     Constant, Benjamin
     1993 (1820) “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns,” Political Writings, ed. & trans. by Fontana, Biancamaria. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
     Cooper, Laurence D.
     1999 Rousseau, Nature, and the Problem of the Good Life. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
     Cranston, Maurice
     1991a The Noble Savage: Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     1991b Jean-Jacques: The Early Life and Work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 1712-1754. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     1997 The Solitary Self: Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Exile and Adversity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Dagger, Richard
     1997 Civic Virtues : Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
     Ellison, Charles E.
     1991 “The Moral Economy of the Modern City: Reading Rousseau’s Discourse on Wealth,” History of Political Thought, Vol.12, No.2: 253-261.
     Feinberg, Barbara Silberdick
     1993 (1970)”Creativity and the Political Community: The Role of the Lawgiver in the Thought of Plato, Machiavelli and Rousseau,” in S. Mukherjee & S. Ramaswamy(ed.), Great Western Political Thinkers VI. Deep & Deep Publications F-159. Rajouri Garden. pp.607-625.
     Fralin, Richard
     1986 “Rousseau and Community: the Role of Moeurs in Social Change,” History of Political Thought, Vol.XII, No.1: 131-50.
     Friden, Bertil
     1998 Rousseau`s Economic Philosophy: Beyond the Market of Innocents. Dordrecht: Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
     Grant, Ruth Weissbourd
     1997 Hypocrisy and Integrity : Machiavelli, Rousseau, and the Ethics of Politics. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
     Hirschman, Albert O
     1997 (1977) The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
     Keohane, Nannerl O.
     1979 “Rousseau on Life, Liberty and Property: A Comment on MacAdam,” in Parel, A. & Flanagan, T. eds., Theories of Property: Aristotle to Present. Waterloo, Ont.: Published for the Calgary Institute for the Humanities by Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
     1980 Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
     Lowith, Karl
     1991 From Hegel to Nietzsche: the Revolution in Nineteenth Century Thought. New York : Columbia University Press.
     MacAdam, J.
     1979 “Rousseau: Moral Dimensions of Property,” in Parel, A. & Flanagan, T. eds., Theories of Property: Aristotle to Present. Waterloo, Ont.: Published for the Calgary Institute for the Humanities by Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
     Machiavelli, Niccolo
     1998 The Prince. translated by Harvey C. Mansfield. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Mansfield, Harvey Claflin
     1996 Machiavelli`s Virtue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Masters, Roger D.
     1968 The Political Philosophy of Rousseau. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     1994 “Introduction,” in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol:4, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, University Press of New England.
     Matthews, Rick. & Ingersoll, David.
     1993 (1980)”The Therapist and the Lawgiver: Rousseau’s Political Version,” in S. Mukherjee & S. Ramaswamy(ed.), Great Western Political Thinkers VI. Deep & Deep Publications F-159. Rajouri Garden. pp.271-290.
     Melzer, M.
     1980 “Rousseau and the Problem of Bourgeois Society,” The American Political Science Review, Vol.74: 1018-33.
     Mulgan, Richard
     1990, "Aristotle and the Value of Political Participation," Political Theory, Vol. 18 No.2, May 1990: 195-215.
     O’Neal, John C.
     1986 “Rousseau’s Theory of Wealth,” History of European Ideas, Vol.7, No.5: 453-67.
     Plato
     1968 The Republic of Plato. translated, with notes and an interpretive essay, by Allan Bloom. New York: Basic Books.
     Pocock, J. G. A.
     1995 (1985) Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
     Putterman, Ethan
     1999 “The Role of Public Opinion in Rousseau’s Conception of Property,” History of Political Thought, Vol.20, No.3: 417-31.
     Ryan, Alan
     1984 Property and Political Theory. Oxford, N.Y.: B. Blackwell.
     1987 Property. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
     1991 阿蘭•賴恩(Alan Ryan)著，顧蓓瞱譯。《財產》，台北：桂冠。
     Starobinski, Jean
     1988 Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction. translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     1993 Blessings in Disguise, or The Morality of Evil. translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     Shklar, Judith N.
     1985 (1969) Men and Citizen: A Study of Rousseau’s Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Skinner, Quentin
     1978 The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
     1981 Machiavelli. Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press.
     1983 史金納(Quentin Skinner)著，蔡英文譯，《馬基維利》，台北：聯經。
     Smith, Steven B.
     1986 "Goodness, Nobility & Virtue in Aristotle`s Political Science," Polity, 19:5-26.
     Strauss, Leo
     1953 Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Teichgraeber III, Richard
     1981 “Rousseau’s Argument for Property,” History of European Ideas, Vol.2, No.2: 115-34.
     Viroli, Maurizio
     1995 For Love of Ccountry: An Essay on Patriotism and Nationalism. New York; Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     Vaughan, Charles Edwyn
     1962 The Political Writings of Jean Jacques Rousseau. 2 Vols. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
     Watkins, F. M.
     1986 “Introduction,” in Jean Jacques Rousseau: Political Writings, translated and edited by Frederick Watkins, University of Wisconsin Press.
     Waldman, Theodore
     1993 (1960)“Rousseau on the General Will and the Legislator,” in S. Mukherjee & S. Ramaswamy(ed.), Great Western Political Thinkers VI. Deep & Deep Publications F-159. Rajouri Garden. pp.382-392.
     Wokler, Robert
     1995 Rousseau. Oxford, [England] ; New York : Oxford University Press.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
政治學系
86252006
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001771
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蕭高彥zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 謝政達zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsieh, Cheng-Daen_US
dc.creator (作者) 謝政達zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsieh, Cheng-Daen_US
dc.date (日期) 2000en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Apr-2016 16:33:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Apr-2016 16:33:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Apr-2016 16:33:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) A2002001771en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/85530-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 政治學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 86252006zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 盧梭的思想內涵豐富，不同學者由於關切的焦點不同，其所研究的主題也各異，例如，有些學者關懷的是盧梭思想在觀念史上的定位與影響，另外有些學者則是關心盧梭思想中的民主或極權成分，但是關於盧梭思想中公民共和主義的要素，則少有人提及。因此，本文的主要論旨即是從公民共和主義的核心觀念──腐化與德行此一角度切入，分析其政治思想。
     根據此一研究主軸，本文第二章探討的是盧梭思想中的腐化意涵、腐化的歷程，以及造成腐化的各種因素，並將腐化的現象區分成政治腐化與和財產相關的社會腐化。面對這些腐化現象，盧梭是以德行作為對治之道，一方面以德行為標準批判當時政治、社會的腐化，另一方面則是以德行作為理想政治共同體重建的基礎。盧梭的這些想法似乎是深受古典共和主義思想家，以及古斯巴達與羅馬兩共和國影響。關於盧梭德行觀將在本文第三章探討。
     以德行為基礎的政治共同體重建，將可在盧梭的社會契約理論，以及盧梭為其他國家草擬憲法、改革政制的著作中獲得印證。社會契約接櫫了理想政治共同體的原型，而社會契約的締結與維繫則有賴一位卓然出眾的立法家，他一方面轉化、消除造成腐化的種種因素，另一方面則創造培育德行的環境，使「德行共和國」的理想得以實現。
     然而並非所有思想家對腐化的思考方向都和盧梭相同，孟德斯鳩與康士坦都提出和盧梭相異的思考，本文最後將探討這些思想家和盧梭思想的差異之處。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The essence of Rousseau‘s thought is rich. A wide variety of focuses are thus occurred due to various scholar’s different concerns. Their research subjects are different too. For example, some scholars concern the position and influence of Rousseau’s thought on the idea of history, while others concern the components of democracy and authoritarianism of his thought. Nevertheless, the concerning of the elements of Rousseau’s thought on civic republicanism is not very prevailing. The main purpose of this thesis is from the core concept of civic republicanism, i.e., corruption and virtue, to analyze Rousseau’s political thought.
     Based on this research core, the second chapter of this thesis discusses the meaning of corruption, its process and the factors in causing corruption, as well as to divide the phenomena of corruption into political corruption and social corruption which is relevant to property. Rousseau dealt these corrupt phenomena with virtue. One the one hand, he applied virtue as the standard to criticize the contemporary political and social corruption. On the other hand, he applied virtue as the foundation to reconstruct ideal political community. The thought of Rousseau seems to be influenced by the classical republicanism thinkers and the two ancient Republic, i. e., Sparta and Rome Republic. Rousseau’s view toward virtue will be discussed in the third chapter of this thesis.
     The foundation of reconstructing political community by virtue will be found in Rousseau’s theory of social contract and to be proved in Rousseau’s drafting the manuscript of constitution reform policy for other states. Social contract reveals the stereotype of ideal political community, however, the binding and the maintaining of social contract depends on an outstanding legislator. On the one hand, he transforms and eliminates the various factors of corruption formation. On the other hand, he creates the various environment of virtue cultivation, enforcing the “Republic of virtue” to be realized.
     Not every thinker’s way of thinking toward corruption is the same with Rousseau. Montesquieu’s and Constant’s thinking are different from Rousseau. The last part of this thesis will discuss the differences among them.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 封面頁
     證明書
     論文摘要
     目錄
     說明
     緒 論
     第一章 歷史背景與研究方法
     第一節 盧梭的生平與當時歷史背景
     第二節 盧梭的寫作風格與本文研究方法與限制
     第三節 文獻檢閱
     第二章 窮腐化之因：人性與財產
     第一節 腐化的意涵、歷程與助因
     第二節 政治腐化
     第三節 與財產相關的社會腐化
     第三章 究德行之效：仿古以御今
     第一節 古典共和主義的德行觀
     第二節 盧梭德行觀的原始圖像與意涵
     第三節 德行的角色與作用
     第四章 社會契約：政治共同體之重建與維繫
     第一節 社會契約的作用及其締結
     第二節 普遍意志與德行
     第三節 立法家與維繫社會契約的外在條件
     結 論
     參考書目		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001771en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 盧梭zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 腐化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 德行zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公民共和主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 財產zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 私愛之心zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會契約zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 立法家zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 普遍意志zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Jean-Jacques Rousseauen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) corruptionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) virtueen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) civic republicanismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) propertyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) amour propreen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) social contracten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) legislatoren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) general willen_US
dc.title (題名) 盧梭論腐化、德行與政治共同體之重建zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Rousseau on Corruption, Virtue and the Reconstruction of Political Communityen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、原典部份
     盧梭(Jean-Jacques Rousseau)
     Confessions. in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol:5, edited by Christopher Kelly, Roger D. Masters and Peter G. Stillman, University Press of New England, 1995.
     Considerations on the Government of Poland. in Jean Jacques Rousseau: Political Writings, translated and edited by Frederick Watkins, University of Wisconsin Press, 1986.
     Constitutional Project for Corsica. in Jean Jacques Rousseau: Political Writings, translated and edited by Frederick Watkins, University of Wisconsin Press, 1986.
     “Discourse on Political Economy,” in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol: 3, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, University Press of New England, 1992.
     Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality among Men. in Rousseau: The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, edited and translated by Victor Gourevitch, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
     Discourse on the Sciences and Arts. in Rousseau: The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, edited and translated by Victor Gourevitch, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
     “Discourse on the Virtue a Hero Most Needs,” in Rousseau: The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, edited and translated by Victor Gourevitch, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
     Emile. introduction, translation and notes by Allan Bloom, New York: Basic Books.
     Geneva Manuscript. in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol:4, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, University Press of New England, 1994.
     On Social Contract. in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol:4, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, University Press of New England, 1994.
     “Political Fragments,” in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol:4, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, University Press of New England, 1994.
     Politics and Art: Letter to M. D’Alembert on the Theatre, translated with notes and introduction by Allan Bloom. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 1968.
     “Preface to Narcissus,” in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol:2, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, University Press of New England, 1992.
     “State of War,” in Rousseau: The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, edited and translated by Victor Gourevitch, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
     《一個孤獨漫步者的遐想》。袁筱一(譯)，一九九七年，桂林：漓江出版社。
     《社會契約論》。何兆武(譯)，一九八七年，台北：唐山出版社。
     〈科學與藝術的復興是否有助於敦風化俗〉，何兆武(譯)，一九九七年，北京：商務印書館。
     《新愛洛伊絲》。李平漚、何三雅(譯)，一九九六年，台北：林鬱文化事業有限公司。
     《論人類不平等的起源和基礎》。李常山(譯)，一九九七年，北京：商務印書館。
     《愛彌兒：論教育》。李平漚(譯)，一九九六年，北京：商務印書館。
     《盧梭自選書信集》。劉陽(譯)，一九九七年，南京：譯林出版社。
     《盧梭散文選》。李平漚(譯)，一九九五年，天津：百花文藝出版社。
     《懺悔錄》。黎星、范希衡(譯)，一九九八年，北京：人民文學出版社。
     二、其它相關文獻
     (一)中文文獻
     丁詩韻
     1991 《盧梭的自然主義哲學》，台中：私立東海大學哲學研究所碩士論文。托克維爾(TocquevilleAlexis de)著，馮棠(譯)
     1994 《舊制度與大革命》，香港：牛津大學出版社。
     江金太
     1987 《歷史與政治》，台北：桂冠圖書公司。
     江宜樺
     1995 〈政治社群與生命共同體—亞里斯多德城邦理論的若干啟示〉，收錄於江宜樺，陳秀容編，《政治社群》，頁39-75。台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書(38)。
     朱堅章
     1972 〈盧梭政治思想中自由觀念的分析〉，《國立政治大學學報》第二十六期，頁183-205。
     沈清松
     1995 〈盧梭社會契約論的評析：一個奠基性迷思的轉變〉，收錄於張福建、蘇文流(主編)，《民主理論：古典與現代》，頁51-72。台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書(35)。
     吳榮輝
     1986 《盧梭政治理論的研究：民主或極權？》，台北：私立輔仁大學歷史研究所碩士論文。
     杜蘭 (Durant, Will James)著，幼獅翻譯中心編譯
     1978 《盧梭與法國》，台北：幼獅文化公司。
     韋洪武
     1988 《盧梭民主思想之研究》，台北：國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。
     莊志明
     1991 《盧梭思想初探：從自然人權利到社會道德的義務》，台北：國立臺灣大學哲學研究所碩士論文。
     莊國銘
     1997 《德性與政治社群—亞里斯多德城邦理論之研究》，政大政治所碩士論文。
     張少忠
     1976 《盧梭在愛彌中教育思想之研究》，台北：私立中國文化大學法國文學研究所。
     張芝聯(主編)
     1989 《法國通史》，北京：北京大學出版社。
     張福建
     1999 〈在自由主義與共和主義之外：梅迪遜早期憲政思想探索〉，發表於中研院社科所主辦「自由主義」學術研討會。6月25-26日。
     黃素玉
     1988 《盧梭學前教育思想之研究》，台北：國立臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所。
     楊共樂
     1998 《羅馬共和國時期》(下)。北京：商務印書館。
     蔡英文
     1999 〈公民德性、市民社會與主權國家：現代市民社會論述之探討〉，《政治科學論叢》第十期，頁83-112。台北：國立台灣大學政治學系。
     樓繼中
     1995 《盧梭自然教育思想之研究》，台中：私立東海大學哲學研究所。撒路斯提烏斯(C. Sallustius Crispus)著，王以鑄、崔妙因(譯)
     1996 《喀提林陰謀、朱古達戰爭》，北京：商務印書館。
     蕭高彥
     1998 〈盧梭論民主共和主義〉，發表於國科會整合型計畫「民主政治理論專題研究」學術研討會。7月31日。
     1999 〈盧梭論現代政治秩序──一個政治神學的考察〉，發表於中研院社科所主辦「自由主義」學術研討會。6月25-26日。
     (二)英文文獻
     Althuser, Louis
     1982 Politics and History: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Hegel and Marx.Trans.Ben Brewster. London: Verso.
     Aristotle
     1984a Politics. translated, and with an introduction, notes, and glossary by Carnes Lord. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     1984b Aristotle`s Nicomachean Ethics. translation with commentaries and glossary by Hippocrates G. Apostle. Grinnell, Ia.: Peripatetic Press.
     Barnard, F. M.
     1988 Self-Direction and Political Legitimacy: Rousseau and Herder. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University.
     Bartlett, Robert C.
     1994 "The `Realism` of Classical Political Science," American Journal of Political Science, Vol.38, No.2, May 1994:381-402.
     Blum, Carol
     1986 Rousseau and the Republic of Virtue : the Language of Politics in the French Revolution. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.
     Constant, Benjamin
     1993 (1820) “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns,” Political Writings, ed. & trans. by Fontana, Biancamaria. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
     Cooper, Laurence D.
     1999 Rousseau, Nature, and the Problem of the Good Life. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
     Cranston, Maurice
     1991a The Noble Savage: Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     1991b Jean-Jacques: The Early Life and Work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 1712-1754. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     1997 The Solitary Self: Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Exile and Adversity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Dagger, Richard
     1997 Civic Virtues : Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
     Ellison, Charles E.
     1991 “The Moral Economy of the Modern City: Reading Rousseau’s Discourse on Wealth,” History of Political Thought, Vol.12, No.2: 253-261.
     Feinberg, Barbara Silberdick
     1993 (1970)”Creativity and the Political Community: The Role of the Lawgiver in the Thought of Plato, Machiavelli and Rousseau,” in S. Mukherjee & S. Ramaswamy(ed.), Great Western Political Thinkers VI. Deep & Deep Publications F-159. Rajouri Garden. pp.607-625.
     Fralin, Richard
     1986 “Rousseau and Community: the Role of Moeurs in Social Change,” History of Political Thought, Vol.XII, No.1: 131-50.
     Friden, Bertil
     1998 Rousseau`s Economic Philosophy: Beyond the Market of Innocents. Dordrecht: Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
     Grant, Ruth Weissbourd
     1997 Hypocrisy and Integrity : Machiavelli, Rousseau, and the Ethics of Politics. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
     Hirschman, Albert O
     1997 (1977) The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
     Keohane, Nannerl O.
     1979 “Rousseau on Life, Liberty and Property: A Comment on MacAdam,” in Parel, A. & Flanagan, T. eds., Theories of Property: Aristotle to Present. Waterloo, Ont.: Published for the Calgary Institute for the Humanities by Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
     1980 Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
     Lowith, Karl
     1991 From Hegel to Nietzsche: the Revolution in Nineteenth Century Thought. New York : Columbia University Press.
     MacAdam, J.
     1979 “Rousseau: Moral Dimensions of Property,” in Parel, A. & Flanagan, T. eds., Theories of Property: Aristotle to Present. Waterloo, Ont.: Published for the Calgary Institute for the Humanities by Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
     Machiavelli, Niccolo
     1998 The Prince. translated by Harvey C. Mansfield. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Mansfield, Harvey Claflin
     1996 Machiavelli`s Virtue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Masters, Roger D.
     1968 The Political Philosophy of Rousseau. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     1994 “Introduction,” in The Collected Writings of Rousseau Vol:4, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly, University Press of New England.
     Matthews, Rick. & Ingersoll, David.
     1993 (1980)”The Therapist and the Lawgiver: Rousseau’s Political Version,” in S. Mukherjee & S. Ramaswamy(ed.), Great Western Political Thinkers VI. Deep & Deep Publications F-159. Rajouri Garden. pp.271-290.
     Melzer, M.
     1980 “Rousseau and the Problem of Bourgeois Society,” The American Political Science Review, Vol.74: 1018-33.
     Mulgan, Richard
     1990, "Aristotle and the Value of Political Participation," Political Theory, Vol. 18 No.2, May 1990: 195-215.
     O’Neal, John C.
     1986 “Rousseau’s Theory of Wealth,” History of European Ideas, Vol.7, No.5: 453-67.
     Plato
     1968 The Republic of Plato. translated, with notes and an interpretive essay, by Allan Bloom. New York: Basic Books.
     Pocock, J. G. A.
     1995 (1985) Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
     Putterman, Ethan
     1999 “The Role of Public Opinion in Rousseau’s Conception of Property,” History of Political Thought, Vol.20, No.3: 417-31.
     Ryan, Alan
     1984 Property and Political Theory. Oxford, N.Y.: B. Blackwell.
     1987 Property. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
     1991 阿蘭•賴恩(Alan Ryan)著，顧蓓瞱譯。《財產》，台北：桂冠。
     Starobinski, Jean
     1988 Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction. translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     1993 Blessings in Disguise, or The Morality of Evil. translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     Shklar, Judith N.
     1985 (1969) Men and Citizen: A Study of Rousseau’s Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Skinner, Quentin
     1978 The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
     1981 Machiavelli. Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press.
     1983 史金納(Quentin Skinner)著，蔡英文譯，《馬基維利》，台北：聯經。
     Smith, Steven B.
     1986 "Goodness, Nobility & Virtue in Aristotle`s Political Science," Polity, 19:5-26.
     Strauss, Leo
     1953 Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Teichgraeber III, Richard
     1981 “Rousseau’s Argument for Property,” History of European Ideas, Vol.2, No.2: 115-34.
     Viroli, Maurizio
     1995 For Love of Ccountry: An Essay on Patriotism and Nationalism. New York; Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     Vaughan, Charles Edwyn
     1962 The Political Writings of Jean Jacques Rousseau. 2 Vols. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
     Watkins, F. M.
     1986 “Introduction,” in Jean Jacques Rousseau: Political Writings, translated and edited by Frederick Watkins, University of Wisconsin Press.
     Waldman, Theodore
     1993 (1960)“Rousseau on the General Will and the Legislator,” in S. Mukherjee & S. Ramaswamy(ed.), Great Western Political Thinkers VI. Deep & Deep Publications F-159. Rajouri Garden. pp.382-392.
     Wokler, Robert
     1995 Rousseau. Oxford, [England] ; New York : Oxford University Press.		zh_TW