1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 英國行政改革理論與現象檢證
Administration reform theory and phenomenon examine of Britain
作者 林德芳
Ter Fang, Lin
貢獻者 吳秀光
Samuel S. Wu
林德芳
Ter Fang , Lin
關鍵詞 行政改革
政策弔詭
公共管理
雷尼稽核
財務管理方案
續階計畫
附屬機關改革方案
公民誓約
Administration reform
Policy paradoxes
public management
Rayner Scrutinies
Financial Management Initiative
Next Steps
Agency Management Initiative
The Citizen’s Charter
日期 1999
上傳時間 22-Apr-2016 15:12:23 (UTC+8)
摘要 這篇論文試著以凱登的行政改革理論與科可特對行政改革現象的見解為基礎，來分析英國行政改革的各項措施，包括雷尼稽核、財務管理改革方案、附屬機關改革方案與90年代後的「公民誓約」運動，探究改革理論與現象與英國行政改革方案兩者之間的關連性，並對此提出對我國行政改革的提醒
This paper try to analyze Caiden`s administration reform theory and Kickert`s administration reform phenomenon opinion,and take them to analyze Britain administration reform every measures.This include Rayner Scrutinies、Financial Management Initiative、Agency Management Initiative and 90s`「The Citizen’s Charter」movement,to investigate between administration reform theory and phenomenon and Britain administration reform measures to have any corelation.Last,take conclusion to remind our administration reform.
參考文獻 中文部分
     文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園、張春興
      民81，社會及行為科學研究法，台北：東華出版社。
     朱鎮明、楊繼明
      民88，「英國的政府再造經驗」，新公共管理—政府再造的理論與實務，
     台北：五南出版社
     朱鎮明
     民88，「公共管理意識型態基礎之探索性研究暨我國政府再造的歷程、策略
     與評估1979—」，未出版之博士論文計畫書
     李忠正
     民86，「淺介英國文官改革」，人事月刊，24卷2期
     呂振興
      民85，台灣地區行政革新經驗之深層解釋，國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩
      士論文。
     何鴻榮
      民84，「行政重組的成因和原則之解析—兼論行政院組織法修正的動機和應
      有之方向」，公共組織理論問題分析與改革策略，林水波編輯，作者自印。
     林水波編著
      民84，公共組織理論問題分析與改革策略，作者自印
     民88，政府再造，台北，智勝出版社
     吳瓊恩
      民81，「台灣四十年來行政組織理性的批判及其未來改革的方向」，光復後
      台灣地區發展經驗，賴澤涵等主編，頁275-308
     吳秀光
      民87，「由理性抉擇途徑談行政革新」，政治大學公共行政學報，2：191-210
     范祥偉
     民77，「英國人事管理及公共行政發展之我見」，人事月刊，6卷2期
     民77，「英國中央人事行政組織及其發展趨勢」，人事月刊，6卷5期
     民77，「英國繼續改革文官制度」，人事管理，25卷4期
     民86，「當前英國文官制度發展之研究」，人事行政，122期
     胡康大
      民86，英國政府與政治，台北：揚智文化。
     施能傑
      民84， 「人事政策改革是行政改革的核心」，人事月刊，21卷3期，頁38-44
      民86，「歐美的行政改革：源起與內涵」，中國行政學會行政效能研討會
     民87，「政府的績效管理改革」，人事月刊， 26卷5期
     徐仁輝
     民88，「公共選擇觀點下的民主行政」，「民主行政與政府再造」學術研
     討會
     黃臺生
      民83，「行政革新：英國的經驗（上）」，人事月刊，19卷第5期
      民83，「行政革新：英國的經驗（中）」，人事月刊，19卷第6期
      民83，「行政革新：英國的經驗（下）」，人事月刊，20卷第1期
     陳金貴
      民80，「公共行政研究主題之發展趨勢」，行政學報，23期，頁63-96。
     陳威豪
      民87，行政革新之研究—一個顧客導向的觀點，國立政治大學公共行政研究
      所碩士論文。
     陳敦源
      民88，「誰掌控官僚體系?從代理人理論談官僚體系的政治控制問題」，民
     主行政與政府再造學術研討會
     陳正隆
      民88，「紐西蘭政府之經濟改革—理論、系絡與學習」，新公共管理—政府
     再造的理論與實務，台北：五南出版社
     詹中原編著
      民88，新公共管理—政府再造的理論與實務，台北：五南出版社
     孫本初
      民86，公共管理，台北：時英出版社。
     Micklethwai & Wooldridge著, 汪仲譯
      民87，企業巫醫，台北：商業週刊出版社
     Rubin, Allen & Babbie ,Earl著，趙碧華、朱美珍譯
      民84，研究方法—社會工作暨人文科學領域的運用。台北：雙葉書廊
     鄭國泰
      民86，新公共管理在行政革新中的困境，國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士
      論文
     蕭鈺
     民85，「英美兩國近年來文官改革的啟示」，人事行政，第117期
     聶文娟
      民83，公共組織變遷理論之建構—行政院組織法修正案分析，國立政治大學
      公共行政研究所碩士論文
     蘇彩足、施能傑
      民87年，「各國行政革新策略與措施比較分析」，行政院研考會委託研究
     英文部分
     Berle, Adolf and Gardiner Means
      1932 The Modern Corporation & Private Property.New York:Macmillan.
     Bozeman, Barry and J.D. Straussman
     1990 Public Management strategies:Guidelines for Management
     Effectiveness,San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
     Brodkin, E
     1986 The False Promise of Administrative Reform :Implementing Quality
     Control in Welfare ,Temple University Press,Philadelphia,1986.
     Butler, R.,
     1992 Managing the new public services:towards a new framework?`.
     Public Policy and Management, vol.7(3), 1-14
     1993 “The Evolution of the Civil Service：A Progress Report” Publc
     Administration Vol.71, Autumn,,pp.395-406
     Caiden,Gerald E.
      1969 Administration reform,Chigago:Aldine.
     1991 Administrative Reform Comes of Age, N.Y.:Walter de Gruyter.
     Cabinet Office
     1994 Next steps: moving on（The Trosa Report）. Cabinet Office, London
     Colville, 1. Dalton, K. & Tornkins, C.,
     1993 Developing and Understanding Cultural Change in HM Customs and
     Exercise: "There is More to Dancing than Knowing the Next Steps", Public Administration, Vol.71, pp.549-566
     Cm 2626
     1994 Better accounting for the taxpayerv `s monky. Resource accounting and
     budgeting in government. HMSO, London
     Cm 2627
     1994 The civil service.Continuity and change.HMSO,London.
     Cmnd ,8616
      1982 Efficiency and Management ,HMSO.
     Campbell, C. and G.K. Wilson
     1995 The end of Whitehall. Blackwell, Oxford.
     Connolly, Michael；McKeown, Penny and Grainne Milligan-Byrne
     1995 Making the Public Sector More User Friendly ? A Critical Examination of
     the Citizen`s Charter.Parliamentary Affairs, 47(1), 23-36.
     Crain ,M and Tollison,R.D.
     1990 Predicting Politics :Essays in Empirical Public Choice.Ann
     Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
     Crew Jr, Robert F.
      1992 Politics and Public Management . New York:West.
     Davies, A. and Willman, J.,
     1991 What next? Agencies, departments and the civil service.
     Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
     Downs ,A.
     1957 An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, Harper and Row
     1960 Why the Government Budget is too Small in a Democracy,
      Wbrld Politics 12, 541-64.
      1967 Inside Bureaucracy, Boston, Little, Brown and Company
     Drucker
     1977 Management.London,Pan Books
     Efficient Unit
      1988 Improving Management In Government :The Next Steps. HMSO
     Friedman ,Milton and Friedman,Rose
     1980 Free to Choose,Harmondsworth：Penguin
     Fry,G.K.
     1988 Thatcher Government,The Financial Management Initative ,and The
      New Civil Service "Public Administration ,Vol.66,Spring , pp1-20
     Garson ,G.D. and E.S. Overman,
     1983 Public Management Research in the United Stated, New York :Praeger
     Publishers.
     Gretton, John, and Harrison, Anthony, （eds.）
     1987 Reshaping Central Government. Oxford,UK: Transaction Books
     Goldsmith,M.J. and Page,E.C.
     1997 “Farewell to the Britain State?” in J.-M. Lane,（eds）Public Sector
     Reform：Rationale,Trends and Problems. Londdon：Sage
     Goldsworthy,Diana
      1949 “The Citizen’s Charter” Public Policy and Administration,69：3-19
     Greer,P
     1994 Transforming Central Government : The Next Step Initiative.
     Buckingham,UK:Open University Press.
     Heymann ,D.
     1988 Input Controls and the Public Sector: What Does Economic
      Theory Offer?` paper prepared for the Fiscal Affairs Department,
     International Monetary Fund, Washington DC
     Hill ,Hermann and Klages ,Helmut (Eds)
     1995 Trends in Public Sector Renewal：Recent Developments and
     Concepts of Awarding Excellence : Peter Lang.
     Hood,C.C.
     1991 “ A public management for all reasons” Public Administration
     vol. 69,pp.3-19.
     HogWood,B.W
     1992 Trends in British Public Policy ：Do Government Make any Difference?
      Buckingham：Open University Press.
     Hood, C. and Jackson,M.
      1991 Administration Argument,Dartmouth.
     http://www.open.gove.uk/charter/ccuhome.htm
     Hughes, Owen E.
     1994 Public Management and Administration:An Introduction, St.Martin’s
     Press
     Jenkins, B.,
     1993 "Reshaping the Management of Government: The Next Steps Initiative
     in the United Kingdom" , in F. L. Seidle (eds.), Rethinking Government:
     Reform or Revolution, Quebec: Institute for Research on Public Policy
     Jordan,Grant and O’Toole,Barry J
     1995 Next Steps：Origins and Destinations. in Jordan,Grant and
     O’Toole,Barry J（eds）Next Steps : Improving Management in
     Government?Dartmouth.
     Jordan,Grant and O’Toole,Barry J（eds）
     1995 Next Steps : Improving Management in Government?
     Dartmouth
     Kemp,P
      1993 Beyond Next Steps：a Civil Service for the 21st Century,Social Market Foundation.Paper No.17
     Kemp, P.,
     1996 The civil service White Paper: a job half finished. Public Administration,
     vol. 72, pp. 591-598
     Kickert, Walter J.（Eds）
     1997 Public Management and Administration Reform in Western
     Europe, Edward Elgar.
     Koontz, H.(ed.)
      1980 Management:a book of readings. McGraw/Hill, NewYork.
     Lan ,Z and Rosenbloom , D.H.
      1992 Editorial ,Public Administration Review ,Vol.52,No.6,pp.835-537
     Lane, Jan-Erik
      1997 Public Sector Reform：Rationale,Trends and Problems. Londdon：Sage.
     Lynn, Jr. Laurence E.
      1987 Managing Public Policy, Boston:Little ,Brown and Company.
     Metcalfe ,L and Richards ,S.
      1990 Improving Public Management,2nd ed. London：Sage.
     Mueller ,D.
     1979 Public Choice.Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
     Niskanen ,W.A.
     1971 Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, IL,
      Ardine Atherton;
     1973 Bureaucracy: Servant or Master?Lassons from America. London, Institute
     for Economic Affairs.
     Osbourne,D.and Gaebler,T.
     1993 Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming
     the Public Sector. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
     Ott , J.S. Hyde ,a.c. and Shafritz,J.M.
      1991 Public Management : The Essential Readings. Chicago:Nelson-Hall
     Overman, E. S.
     1984 Public Management :What’s New and Different ? Public Administration
     Review, vol .44 ,no.3.pp,275.
     Perry , J. L. and Kraemer, K.L.
      1983 Public Management :Public and Private Perspective. California:Mayfield.
     Public Accounts Committee
      1994. The proper conduct of public business. Eighth report, session 1993-94.
     HMSO, London (HC 154)
     Power,M
      1994 The audit explosion.DEMOS,London.
     Pollitt,C, in M . cave, M, Kogan and R. Smith(Eds)
      1990a Output and Perforrmance Management in Government :The
     State of the Art ,Jessica Kingsley.
     1990b Managerialism and the Public Service: The Anglo-American
     Experience,Basil Blackwell.
     Pollitt,C.
     1990 Managerialism and the Public Service:The Anglo-American Experience,
     Oxford: Basil Blackwell
     1993 Managerialism and the Public Service:The Anglo-American Experience,
     Oxford: Basil Blackwell
     Price Waterhouse
     1994 Executive agencies：facts and trends. Price Waterhouse, London, edition
     & Survey Report 1994, May.
     Prime Minister
      1990 Progress in the Next Steps Initiative,Cm.1263,HMSO.
     Richards, Sue
      1987 The Financial Management Initiative in Gretton, John, and Harrison, Anthony, （eds.）Reshaping Central Government. Oxford,UK: Transaction Books
     Seckler-Hudsonn ,Catheryn
      1992 Basic Concepts in the study of Public Management In J.M.Shafrits and
      A.C. Hyde（eds）,Classic of PublicAdministration pp.203-211.CA:Brooks
     /Cole.
     Spremann , K and Bamberg, G.
     1988 Prologue in G.Bamberg and K.Spremann, Agency Theory,Information
     and Incentives.Berlin ,Springer-Verlag.
     Spremann ,K.
     1989 Agency Theory and Risk Sharing: Agent and Principal, in G.
      Bamberg and K. Spremann, op. cit.
     TCSC（Treasury and Civil Service Committee）
     1997 The role ofthe civil service: interim report. Volume I. Report, together
      with the proceedings of the committee. HC 390-1. Volume II. Minutes of evidenceandappendices. HC 390-11. Sixth report, session 1992-93. HMSO, London.
     Tullock ,G.
     1965 The Politics of Bureaucracy, Washington DC, Public Affairs Press.
     The Civil Service
     1968 Report of a Management Consultancy Group: Evidence submitted to the
     Committee under the Chairmanship of Lord Fulton 1966-68. Vol. 2.
     London,
     HMSO.
     Warner N
     1984 “Raynerism In Practice：Anatomy of a Rayner Scrunity ,” Public
     Administration, Vol.62 Spring ,pp7-22.
     Williamson, Oliver E.
     1996 “Corporate Finannce& Corporate Governance.” In The Mechanisms of
     Governance.New York : Oxford University Press.
     Wilson, G.,
     1991 “Prospects for the public service in Britain: Major to the rescue?”
     International Review of Administrative Science, vol. 57, pp. 327-44
     Wilson. John
      1996 “Citizen Major? The Rationale and Impact of The Citizen’s Charter”
      Public Policy and Administration.11/1：41-62
     Wright, V.,
     1996 “Reshaping the state: implications for public administration” West
     European Politics, vol. 17, pp, 102-34.
     Zifcak, Spencer.
     1994 New Managerialism : Administrative Reform in Whitehall
     and Canberra . Open University Press.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政學系
85256017
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002000733
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳秀光zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Samuel S. Wuen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林德芳zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Ter Fang , Linen_US
dc.creator (作者) 林德芳zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Ter Fang, Linen_US
dc.date (日期) 1999en_US
dc.date.accessioned 22-Apr-2016 15:12:23 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 22-Apr-2016 15:12:23 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 22-Apr-2016 15:12:23 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002000733en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/86022-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 公共行政學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 85256017zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 這篇論文試著以凱登的行政改革理論與科可特對行政改革現象的見解為基礎，來分析英國行政改革的各項措施，包括雷尼稽核、財務管理改革方案、附屬機關改革方案與90年代後的「公民誓約」運動，探究改革理論與現象與英國行政改革方案兩者之間的關連性，並對此提出對我國行政改革的提醒zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This paper try to analyze Caiden`s administration reform theory and Kickert`s administration reform phenomenon opinion,and take them to analyze Britain administration reform every measures.This include Rayner Scrutinies、Financial Management Initiative、Agency Management Initiative and 90s`「The Citizen’s Charter」movement,to investigate between administration reform theory and phenomenon and Britain administration reform measures to have any corelation.Last,take conclusion to remind our administration reform.en_US
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002000733en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 行政改革zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政策弔詭zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公共管理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 雷尼稽核zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 財務管理方案zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 續階計畫zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 附屬機關改革方案zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公民誓約zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Administration reformen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Policy paradoxesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) public managementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Rayner Scrutiniesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Financial Management Initiativeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Next Stepsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Agency Management Initiativeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) The Citizen’s Charteren_US
dc.title (題名) 英國行政改革理論與現象檢證zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Administration reform theory and phenomenon examine of Britainen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分
     文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園、張春興
      民81，社會及行為科學研究法，台北：東華出版社。
     朱鎮明、楊繼明
      民88，「英國的政府再造經驗」，新公共管理—政府再造的理論與實務，
     台北：五南出版社
     朱鎮明
     民88，「公共管理意識型態基礎之探索性研究暨我國政府再造的歷程、策略
     與評估1979—」，未出版之博士論文計畫書
     李忠正
     民86，「淺介英國文官改革」，人事月刊，24卷2期
     呂振興
      民85，台灣地區行政革新經驗之深層解釋，國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩
      士論文。
     何鴻榮
      民84，「行政重組的成因和原則之解析—兼論行政院組織法修正的動機和應
      有之方向」，公共組織理論問題分析與改革策略，林水波編輯，作者自印。
     林水波編著
      民84，公共組織理論問題分析與改革策略，作者自印
     民88，政府再造，台北，智勝出版社
     吳瓊恩
      民81，「台灣四十年來行政組織理性的批判及其未來改革的方向」，光復後
      台灣地區發展經驗，賴澤涵等主編，頁275-308
     吳秀光
      民87，「由理性抉擇途徑談行政革新」，政治大學公共行政學報，2：191-210
     范祥偉
     民77，「英國人事管理及公共行政發展之我見」，人事月刊，6卷2期
     民77，「英國中央人事行政組織及其發展趨勢」，人事月刊，6卷5期
     民77，「英國繼續改革文官制度」，人事管理，25卷4期
     民86，「當前英國文官制度發展之研究」，人事行政，122期
     胡康大
      民86，英國政府與政治，台北：揚智文化。
     施能傑
      民84， 「人事政策改革是行政改革的核心」，人事月刊，21卷3期，頁38-44
      民86，「歐美的行政改革：源起與內涵」，中國行政學會行政效能研討會
     民87，「政府的績效管理改革」，人事月刊， 26卷5期
     徐仁輝
     民88，「公共選擇觀點下的民主行政」，「民主行政與政府再造」學術研
     討會
     黃臺生
      民83，「行政革新：英國的經驗（上）」，人事月刊，19卷第5期
      民83，「行政革新：英國的經驗（中）」，人事月刊，19卷第6期
      民83，「行政革新：英國的經驗（下）」，人事月刊，20卷第1期
     陳金貴
      民80，「公共行政研究主題之發展趨勢」，行政學報，23期，頁63-96。
     陳威豪
      民87，行政革新之研究—一個顧客導向的觀點，國立政治大學公共行政研究
      所碩士論文。
     陳敦源
      民88，「誰掌控官僚體系?從代理人理論談官僚體系的政治控制問題」，民
     主行政與政府再造學術研討會
     陳正隆
      民88，「紐西蘭政府之經濟改革—理論、系絡與學習」，新公共管理—政府
     再造的理論與實務，台北：五南出版社
     詹中原編著
      民88，新公共管理—政府再造的理論與實務，台北：五南出版社
     孫本初
      民86，公共管理，台北：時英出版社。
     Micklethwai & Wooldridge著, 汪仲譯
      民87，企業巫醫，台北：商業週刊出版社
     Rubin, Allen & Babbie ,Earl著，趙碧華、朱美珍譯
      民84，研究方法—社會工作暨人文科學領域的運用。台北：雙葉書廊
     鄭國泰
      民86，新公共管理在行政革新中的困境，國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士
      論文
     蕭鈺
     民85，「英美兩國近年來文官改革的啟示」，人事行政，第117期
     聶文娟
      民83，公共組織變遷理論之建構—行政院組織法修正案分析，國立政治大學
      公共行政研究所碩士論文
     蘇彩足、施能傑
      民87年，「各國行政革新策略與措施比較分析」，行政院研考會委託研究
     英文部分
     Berle, Adolf and Gardiner Means
      1932 The Modern Corporation & Private Property.New York:Macmillan.
     Bozeman, Barry and J.D. Straussman
     1990 Public Management strategies:Guidelines for Management
     Effectiveness,San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
     Brodkin, E
     1986 The False Promise of Administrative Reform :Implementing Quality
     Control in Welfare ,Temple University Press,Philadelphia,1986.
     Butler, R.,
     1992 Managing the new public services:towards a new framework?`.
     Public Policy and Management, vol.7(3), 1-14
     1993 “The Evolution of the Civil Service：A Progress Report” Publc
     Administration Vol.71, Autumn,,pp.395-406
     Caiden,Gerald E.
      1969 Administration reform,Chigago:Aldine.
     1991 Administrative Reform Comes of Age, N.Y.:Walter de Gruyter.
     Cabinet Office
     1994 Next steps: moving on（The Trosa Report）. Cabinet Office, London
     Colville, 1. Dalton, K. & Tornkins, C.,
     1993 Developing and Understanding Cultural Change in HM Customs and
     Exercise: "There is More to Dancing than Knowing the Next Steps", Public Administration, Vol.71, pp.549-566
     Cm 2626
     1994 Better accounting for the taxpayerv `s monky. Resource accounting and
     budgeting in government. HMSO, London
     Cm 2627
     1994 The civil service.Continuity and change.HMSO,London.
     Cmnd ,8616
      1982 Efficiency and Management ,HMSO.
     Campbell, C. and G.K. Wilson
     1995 The end of Whitehall. Blackwell, Oxford.
     Connolly, Michael；McKeown, Penny and Grainne Milligan-Byrne
     1995 Making the Public Sector More User Friendly ? A Critical Examination of
     the Citizen`s Charter.Parliamentary Affairs, 47(1), 23-36.
     Crain ,M and Tollison,R.D.
     1990 Predicting Politics :Essays in Empirical Public Choice.Ann
     Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
     Crew Jr, Robert F.
      1992 Politics and Public Management . New York:West.
     Davies, A. and Willman, J.,
     1991 What next? Agencies, departments and the civil service.
     Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
     Downs ,A.
     1957 An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, Harper and Row
     1960 Why the Government Budget is too Small in a Democracy,
      Wbrld Politics 12, 541-64.
      1967 Inside Bureaucracy, Boston, Little, Brown and Company
     Drucker
     1977 Management.London,Pan Books
     Efficient Unit
      1988 Improving Management In Government :The Next Steps. HMSO
     Friedman ,Milton and Friedman,Rose
     1980 Free to Choose,Harmondsworth：Penguin
     Fry,G.K.
     1988 Thatcher Government,The Financial Management Initative ,and The
      New Civil Service "Public Administration ,Vol.66,Spring , pp1-20
     Garson ,G.D. and E.S. Overman,
     1983 Public Management Research in the United Stated, New York :Praeger
     Publishers.
     Gretton, John, and Harrison, Anthony, （eds.）
     1987 Reshaping Central Government. Oxford,UK: Transaction Books
     Goldsmith,M.J. and Page,E.C.
     1997 “Farewell to the Britain State?” in J.-M. Lane,（eds）Public Sector
     Reform：Rationale,Trends and Problems. Londdon：Sage
     Goldsworthy,Diana
      1949 “The Citizen’s Charter” Public Policy and Administration,69：3-19
     Greer,P
     1994 Transforming Central Government : The Next Step Initiative.
     Buckingham,UK:Open University Press.
     Heymann ,D.
     1988 Input Controls and the Public Sector: What Does Economic
      Theory Offer?` paper prepared for the Fiscal Affairs Department,
     International Monetary Fund, Washington DC
     Hill ,Hermann and Klages ,Helmut (Eds)
     1995 Trends in Public Sector Renewal：Recent Developments and
     Concepts of Awarding Excellence : Peter Lang.
     Hood,C.C.
     1991 “ A public management for all reasons” Public Administration
     vol. 69,pp.3-19.
     HogWood,B.W
     1992 Trends in British Public Policy ：Do Government Make any Difference?
      Buckingham：Open University Press.
     Hood, C. and Jackson,M.
      1991 Administration Argument,Dartmouth.
     http://www.open.gove.uk/charter/ccuhome.htm
     Hughes, Owen E.
     1994 Public Management and Administration:An Introduction, St.Martin’s
     Press
     Jenkins, B.,
     1993 "Reshaping the Management of Government: The Next Steps Initiative
     in the United Kingdom" , in F. L. Seidle (eds.), Rethinking Government:
     Reform or Revolution, Quebec: Institute for Research on Public Policy
     Jordan,Grant and O’Toole,Barry J
     1995 Next Steps：Origins and Destinations. in Jordan,Grant and
     O’Toole,Barry J（eds）Next Steps : Improving Management in
     Government?Dartmouth.
     Jordan,Grant and O’Toole,Barry J（eds）
     1995 Next Steps : Improving Management in Government?
     Dartmouth
     Kemp,P
      1993 Beyond Next Steps：a Civil Service for the 21st Century,Social Market Foundation.Paper No.17
     Kemp, P.,
     1996 The civil service White Paper: a job half finished. Public Administration,
     vol. 72, pp. 591-598
     Kickert, Walter J.（Eds）
     1997 Public Management and Administration Reform in Western
     Europe, Edward Elgar.
     Koontz, H.(ed.)
      1980 Management:a book of readings. McGraw/Hill, NewYork.
     Lan ,Z and Rosenbloom , D.H.
      1992 Editorial ,Public Administration Review ,Vol.52,No.6,pp.835-537
     Lane, Jan-Erik
      1997 Public Sector Reform：Rationale,Trends and Problems. Londdon：Sage.
     Lynn, Jr. Laurence E.
      1987 Managing Public Policy, Boston:Little ,Brown and Company.
     Metcalfe ,L and Richards ,S.
      1990 Improving Public Management,2nd ed. London：Sage.
     Mueller ,D.
     1979 Public Choice.Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
     Niskanen ,W.A.
     1971 Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, IL,
      Ardine Atherton;
     1973 Bureaucracy: Servant or Master?Lassons from America. London, Institute
     for Economic Affairs.
     Osbourne,D.and Gaebler,T.
     1993 Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming
     the Public Sector. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
     Ott , J.S. Hyde ,a.c. and Shafritz,J.M.
      1991 Public Management : The Essential Readings. Chicago:Nelson-Hall
     Overman, E. S.
     1984 Public Management :What’s New and Different ? Public Administration
     Review, vol .44 ,no.3.pp,275.
     Perry , J. L. and Kraemer, K.L.
      1983 Public Management :Public and Private Perspective. California:Mayfield.
     Public Accounts Committee
      1994. The proper conduct of public business. Eighth report, session 1993-94.
     HMSO, London (HC 154)
     Power,M
      1994 The audit explosion.DEMOS,London.
     Pollitt,C, in M . cave, M, Kogan and R. Smith(Eds)
      1990a Output and Perforrmance Management in Government :The
     State of the Art ,Jessica Kingsley.
     1990b Managerialism and the Public Service: The Anglo-American
     Experience,Basil Blackwell.
     Pollitt,C.
     1990 Managerialism and the Public Service:The Anglo-American Experience,
     Oxford: Basil Blackwell
     1993 Managerialism and the Public Service:The Anglo-American Experience,
     Oxford: Basil Blackwell
     Price Waterhouse
     1994 Executive agencies：facts and trends. Price Waterhouse, London, edition
     & Survey Report 1994, May.
     Prime Minister
      1990 Progress in the Next Steps Initiative,Cm.1263,HMSO.
     Richards, Sue
      1987 The Financial Management Initiative in Gretton, John, and Harrison, Anthony, （eds.）Reshaping Central Government. Oxford,UK: Transaction Books
     Seckler-Hudsonn ,Catheryn
      1992 Basic Concepts in the study of Public Management In J.M.Shafrits and
      A.C. Hyde（eds）,Classic of PublicAdministration pp.203-211.CA:Brooks
     /Cole.
     Spremann , K and Bamberg, G.
     1988 Prologue in G.Bamberg and K.Spremann, Agency Theory,Information
     and Incentives.Berlin ,Springer-Verlag.
     Spremann ,K.
     1989 Agency Theory and Risk Sharing: Agent and Principal, in G.
      Bamberg and K. Spremann, op. cit.
     TCSC（Treasury and Civil Service Committee）
     1997 The role ofthe civil service: interim report. Volume I. Report, together
      with the proceedings of the committee. HC 390-1. Volume II. Minutes of evidenceandappendices. HC 390-11. Sixth report, session 1992-93. HMSO, London.
     Tullock ,G.
     1965 The Politics of Bureaucracy, Washington DC, Public Affairs Press.
     The Civil Service
     1968 Report of a Management Consultancy Group: Evidence submitted to the
     Committee under the Chairmanship of Lord Fulton 1966-68. Vol. 2.
     London,
     HMSO.
     Warner N
     1984 “Raynerism In Practice：Anatomy of a Rayner Scrunity ,” Public
     Administration, Vol.62 Spring ,pp7-22.
     Williamson, Oliver E.
     1996 “Corporate Finannce& Corporate Governance.” In The Mechanisms of
     Governance.New York : Oxford University Press.
     Wilson, G.,
     1991 “Prospects for the public service in Britain: Major to the rescue?”
     International Review of Administrative Science, vol. 57, pp. 327-44
     Wilson. John
      1996 “Citizen Major? The Rationale and Impact of The Citizen’s Charter”
      Public Policy and Administration.11/1：41-62
     Wright, V.,
     1996 “Reshaping the state: implications for public administration” West
     European Politics, vol. 17, pp, 102-34.
     Zifcak, Spencer.
     1994 New Managerialism : Administrative Reform in Whitehall
     and Canberra . Open University Press.		zh_TW