學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 市場結構,策略性貿易政策與最適民營化程度 作者 羅鈺珊
Lo, Yu-Shan貢獻者 翁永和
羅鈺珊
Lo, Yu-Shan關鍵詞 民營化
混合型廠商
策略性貿易日期 1998 上傳時間 27-Apr-2016 11:12:20 (UTC+8) 摘要 有鑒於一般討論民營化的理論文獻多著重在純粹公營廠商轉型為純粹民營廠商後的福利分析,本文在開放市場下引進混合型企業的概念,允許部份民營化( partial privatization ),由公民營廠商追求目標不同的角度來探討政府所應採取的最適民營化政策後,得到以下結果: (1)市場競爭程度越高,最適民營化程度越高;(2)國內民營廠商相對於國外廠商家數越多,最適民營化程度越高;(3)若政府與官股持有者議價後決定最適民營化政策,則民營化程度將隨政府議價能力的強度而降低。除了證明以本國福利的觀點出發,在寡佔市場結構之下,部份民營化的方式優於純粹民營或純粹公營政策,本文亦在加入策略性貿易政策後發現,無論是生產補貼與進口關稅的實施,均有助於最適民營化程度的提升。 參考文獻 1. 行政院經濟建設委員會網站(http://cepd.spring.org.tw/)。 2. 江炳坤 (1987)"公營事業民營化與全民優惠釋股"行政院經濟建設委員會網站,推動公營事業民營化,嘉文錄(http://cepd.spring.org.tw/Mission /Private)。 3. 胡仲英 (1987)"公營事業民營化-世界趨勢與我國經驗"行政院經濟建設委員會網站,推動公營事業民營化,嘉文錄(http://cepd.spring.org.tw Mission /Private)。 4. 黃財源 (1995),台灣公營事業民營化理論建構與實踐,政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所博士論文。 5. 詹中原 (1993),民營化政策-公共行政理論與實務之分析,五南圖書出版公司,九月。 6. 薛琦 (1998)"公營事業民營化-世界趨勢與我國經驗"公營事業評論,第一卷第一期,1988年10月,頁25-34。 7. Bos, D. (1987)"Privatization of Public Enterprises."European Economic Review 31 , 352-60. 8. Boycko, M., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny (1996)"A Theory of Privatization"Economics Journal 106(435) , 309-319 9. Brander, J. and B. Spencer (1985)"Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry."Journal of International Economics 18, 83-100. 10. Brooks, S.(1987)"The Mixed Ownership Corporation as an Instrument of Public Policy."Comparative Politics 19, 173-91. 11. Cremer, H., M. Marchand, and J.-F. Thisse (1989)"The Public Firm as an Instru -ment for Regulating an Oligopolistic Market."Oxford Economic Papers 41 , 283 -301. 12. Cremer, H., M. Marchand and J.-F. Thisse (1991)"Mixed Oligopoly with Diffe -rentiated Products."International Journal of Industrial Organization 9 , 43-53. 13. De Fraja, G. and F. Delbono (1989)"Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly"Oxford Economic Papers 41 , 302-11. 14. De Fraja, G. (1991)"Efficiency and Privatization in Imperfectly Competitive Indus -tries."Journal of Industrial Economics 39 , 311-19. 15. Dixit, A. K. (1980)"Investment and Entry Deterrence."Economic Journal 90, 95 -100. 16. Eaton, J. and G. M. Grossman (1986)"Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under Oligopoly."Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 383-406. 17. Eaton, B. C. and R. G. Lipsey (1981)"Capital, Commitment, and Entry Equilibrium. "Bell Journal of Economics 12, 593-604. 18. Eckel, C. C. and A. R. Vining (1985)"Elements of a Theory of Mixed Enterprise. "Scottish Journal of Political Economy 32 , 82-94. 19. Eckel, C. C. and T. Vermaelen (1986)"Internal Regulation: The Effects of Govern -ment Ownership on the Value of the Firm."Journal of Law and Economics 29 , 381-404. 20. Estrin S. and D. de Meza (1995)"Unnatural Monopoly."Journal of Public Eco -nomics 57 , 471-88. 21. Fershtman, C. (1990)"The Interdependence between Ownership Status and Market Structure : The Case of Privatization"Economica 57, 319-28 22. Fjell, K. and D. Pal (1996)"A Mixed Oligopoly in the Presence of Foreign Private Firm."Canadian Journal of Economics 29, 737-43. 23. George, K. and M. La Manna (1996)"Mixed Duopoly, Inefficiency, and Public Ownership."Review of Industrial Organization 11, 853-60. 24. Gianpaolo S. and S. Carlo (1993)"The Ttansforbation of a Labour-Managed Mono -poly: Competition Policy versus Mixed Firm."Journal of International and Com -parative Economics 2 , 191-206. 25. Harris, R. G. and E. G. Wiens (1980)"Government Enterprise: An Instrument for the Internal Regulation of Industry."Canadian Journal of Economics 13, 125-32. 26. Mai, C. C. and H. Hwang (1989)"Export Subsidies and Oligopolistic Rivalry bet -ween Labour-Managed and Capitalist Economies."Journal of Comparative Eco -nomics 13 , 473-80. 27. Merrill, W. and N. Schneider (1966)"Government Firm in Oligopoly Industry."Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 400-12. 28. Okuguchi, K. (1991)"Labour-Managed and Capitalist Firms in International Duopoly: The Effects of Export Subsidy."Journal of Comparative Economics 15 , 476-84. 29. Pal, D. and M. White (1998)"Mixed Oligopoly , Privatization and Strategic Trade Policy."Southern Economic Journal 65(2) , 264-81. 30. Rees, R. (1984)"The Public Enterprise Game."Economic Journal, Conference Papers 94, 109-23. 31. Toshihiro Matsumura (1998)"Partial Privatization in Mixed Duopoly."Journal of Public Economics 70 , 473-83. 32. White, M. (1996)" Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization and Subsidization."Economics Letters 53 , 189-95. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
86258009資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002001625 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 翁永和 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 羅鈺珊 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lo, Yu-Shan en_US dc.creator (作者) 羅鈺珊 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Lo, Yu-Shan en_US dc.date (日期) 1998 en_US dc.date.accessioned 27-Apr-2016 11:12:20 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 27-Apr-2016 11:12:20 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 27-Apr-2016 11:12:20 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002001625 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/86200 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 經濟學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 86258009 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 有鑒於一般討論民營化的理論文獻多著重在純粹公營廠商轉型為純粹民營廠商後的福利分析,本文在開放市場下引進混合型企業的概念,允許部份民營化( partial privatization ),由公民營廠商追求目標不同的角度來探討政府所應採取的最適民營化政策後,得到以下結果: (1)市場競爭程度越高,最適民營化程度越高;(2)國內民營廠商相對於國外廠商家數越多,最適民營化程度越高;(3)若政府與官股持有者議價後決定最適民營化政策,則民營化程度將隨政府議價能力的強度而降低。除了證明以本國福利的觀點出發,在寡佔市場結構之下,部份民營化的方式優於純粹民營或純粹公營政策,本文亦在加入策略性貿易政策後發現,無論是生產補貼與進口關稅的實施,均有助於最適民營化程度的提升。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 前言 1 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第三章 最適民營化政策的基本模型分析 15 第一節 廠商間的產量競爭 18 第二節 最適民營化程度的決定 25 第三節 不同市場結構之下的政策比較 30 第四章 考慮議價效果下的最適民營化政策 34 第五章 貿易策略與最適民營化政策 38 第一節 生產補貼與民營化政策 38 第二節 進口關稅與民營化政策 42 第三節 貿易政策的選擇 47 第六章 結論 50 參考文獻 52 附錄 55 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002001625 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 民營化 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 混合型廠商 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 策略性貿易 zh_TW dc.title (題名) 市場結構,策略性貿易政策與最適民營化程度 zh_TW dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. 行政院經濟建設委員會網站(http://cepd.spring.org.tw/)。 2. 江炳坤 (1987)"公營事業民營化與全民優惠釋股"行政院經濟建設委員會網站,推動公營事業民營化,嘉文錄(http://cepd.spring.org.tw/Mission /Private)。 3. 胡仲英 (1987)"公營事業民營化-世界趨勢與我國經驗"行政院經濟建設委員會網站,推動公營事業民營化,嘉文錄(http://cepd.spring.org.tw Mission /Private)。 4. 黃財源 (1995),台灣公營事業民營化理論建構與實踐,政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所博士論文。 5. 詹中原 (1993),民營化政策-公共行政理論與實務之分析,五南圖書出版公司,九月。 6. 薛琦 (1998)"公營事業民營化-世界趨勢與我國經驗"公營事業評論,第一卷第一期,1988年10月,頁25-34。 7. Bos, D. (1987)"Privatization of Public Enterprises."European Economic Review 31 , 352-60. 8. Boycko, M., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny (1996)"A Theory of Privatization"Economics Journal 106(435) , 309-319 9. Brander, J. and B. Spencer (1985)"Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry."Journal of International Economics 18, 83-100. 10. Brooks, S.(1987)"The Mixed Ownership Corporation as an Instrument of Public Policy."Comparative Politics 19, 173-91. 11. Cremer, H., M. Marchand, and J.-F. Thisse (1989)"The Public Firm as an Instru -ment for Regulating an Oligopolistic Market."Oxford Economic Papers 41 , 283 -301. 12. Cremer, H., M. Marchand and J.-F. Thisse (1991)"Mixed Oligopoly with Diffe -rentiated Products."International Journal of Industrial Organization 9 , 43-53. 13. De Fraja, G. and F. Delbono (1989)"Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly"Oxford Economic Papers 41 , 302-11. 14. De Fraja, G. (1991)"Efficiency and Privatization in Imperfectly Competitive Indus -tries."Journal of Industrial Economics 39 , 311-19. 15. Dixit, A. K. (1980)"Investment and Entry Deterrence."Economic Journal 90, 95 -100. 16. Eaton, J. and G. M. Grossman (1986)"Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under Oligopoly."Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 383-406. 17. Eaton, B. C. and R. G. Lipsey (1981)"Capital, Commitment, and Entry Equilibrium. "Bell Journal of Economics 12, 593-604. 18. Eckel, C. C. and A. R. Vining (1985)"Elements of a Theory of Mixed Enterprise. "Scottish Journal of Political Economy 32 , 82-94. 19. Eckel, C. C. and T. Vermaelen (1986)"Internal Regulation: The Effects of Govern -ment Ownership on the Value of the Firm."Journal of Law and Economics 29 , 381-404. 20. Estrin S. and D. de Meza (1995)"Unnatural Monopoly."Journal of Public Eco -nomics 57 , 471-88. 21. Fershtman, C. (1990)"The Interdependence between Ownership Status and Market Structure : The Case of Privatization"Economica 57, 319-28 22. Fjell, K. and D. Pal (1996)"A Mixed Oligopoly in the Presence of Foreign Private Firm."Canadian Journal of Economics 29, 737-43. 23. George, K. and M. La Manna (1996)"Mixed Duopoly, Inefficiency, and Public Ownership."Review of Industrial Organization 11, 853-60. 24. Gianpaolo S. and S. Carlo (1993)"The Ttansforbation of a Labour-Managed Mono -poly: Competition Policy versus Mixed Firm."Journal of International and Com -parative Economics 2 , 191-206. 25. Harris, R. G. and E. G. Wiens (1980)"Government Enterprise: An Instrument for the Internal Regulation of Industry."Canadian Journal of Economics 13, 125-32. 26. Mai, C. C. and H. Hwang (1989)"Export Subsidies and Oligopolistic Rivalry bet -ween Labour-Managed and Capitalist Economies."Journal of Comparative Eco -nomics 13 , 473-80. 27. Merrill, W. and N. Schneider (1966)"Government Firm in Oligopoly Industry."Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 400-12. 28. Okuguchi, K. (1991)"Labour-Managed and Capitalist Firms in International Duopoly: The Effects of Export Subsidy."Journal of Comparative Economics 15 , 476-84. 29. Pal, D. and M. White (1998)"Mixed Oligopoly , Privatization and Strategic Trade Policy."Southern Economic Journal 65(2) , 264-81. 30. Rees, R. (1984)"The Public Enterprise Game."Economic Journal, Conference Papers 94, 109-23. 31. Toshihiro Matsumura (1998)"Partial Privatization in Mixed Duopoly."Journal of Public Economics 70 , 473-83. 32. White, M. (1996)" Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization and Subsidization."Economics Letters 53 , 189-95. zh_TW