1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Foreign Languages and Literature
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 中文對話中的異議現象
Disagreement in Mandarin Chinese Conversation
作者 林智怡
Lin, Zhi-Yi
貢獻者 李櫻
Li, Ying Cherry Dr.
林智怡
Lin, Zhi-Yi
關鍵詞 異議
中文對話
語用策略
語言特徵
合作 原則
禮貌原則
性別
衝突對話
disagreement
Mandarin Chinese conversation
pragmatic strategies
linguistic features
CP
PP
gender
conflict talk
日期 1998
上傳時間 27-Apr-2016 11:13:50 (UTC+8)
摘要 國 立 政 治 大 學 研 究 所 碩 士 論 文 提 要
Abstract
參考文獻 Bibliography
     Adger, Carolyn Temple. 1984. Communicative competence in the
     culturally diverse classroom: negotiating norms for
     linguistic interaction. In Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,
     linguistics. Georgetown University.
     Albee, E. 1962. Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf? New York:
     Atheneum.
     Aries, Elizabeth. 1976. Interaction patterns and themes of
     male, female and mixed groups. Small Group Behavior 7 (1): 7-
     18.
     Atkinson, Maxwell, and Heritage, John. 1984. Preference
     organization. In Structure of Social Action, Atkinson and Heritage (eds.): 53-56. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge
     University Press.
     Azuma, H., Hess, R. D., Kashin-gawa, K., and Conroy, M. 1980.
     Maternal control strategies and the child’s cognitive
     development: a cross-cultural paradox and its
     interpretation. Paper presented at the International
     Congress of Psychology. Leipzig.
     Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York:
     Ballantine.
     Beebe, L., & cummings, M. 1985. Speech act performance: A
     function of the data collection procedure? Paper presented
     at TESOL ’85, New York.
     Beebe, Leslie M. & Tomoko Takahashi. 1989. Sociolinguistic
     variation in face-threatening speech acts: chastisement and
     disagreement. In The Dynamic Interlanguage: Empirical
     Studies in Second Language Variation, Eisenstein, Mirian R..
     (ed.):199-218. New York: Plenum Press.
     Bilmes, Jack. 1988. The concept of preference in conversation
     analysis. In Language in society 17: 161-181.
     Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1990. You don’t touch lettuce with your
     fingers: Parental politensess in family discourse. Journal
     of Pragmatics: Politeness, 259-288.
     Boggs, Stephen T. 1978. The Development of verbal disputing in
     part-Hawaiian children. Language in Society, 7: 325-344.
     Brenneis, Donald. 1988. Language and disputing. Annual Review
     of Anthropology, 17: 221-237.
     Brenneis, Donald & Laura Lein. 1977. You fruithead: a
     sociolinguistic approach to children’s dispute settlement.
     In Child Discourse, S. Ervin-Tripp and C. Mitchell-Kernan
     (eds.): 49-65. New York: Academic Press.
     Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978/1987.
     Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge:
     Cambridge University Press.
     Coates, Jennifer. 1989. Gossip revisited: language in all-
     female groups. In Women in Their Speech Communities,
     Jennifer Coates and Deborah Cameron (eds.): 94-121. London:
     Longman.
     Edelsky, Carole. 1981. Who’s got the floor? Language in
     Society 10: 383-421.
     Eisenberg, Ann R. and Catherine Garvey. 1981. Children’s use
     of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse
     Processes, 4: 149-170.
     Fraser, Bruce. 1975. The concept of politeness. Paper presented
     at the 1985 NWAVE Meeting. Georgetown University.
     ---. 1990. Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics.
     14: 219-236.
     Fraser, Bruce and William Nolen. 1981. The association of
     deference with linguistic form. International Journal of
     the Sociology of Language 27: 93-109.
     Genishi, Celia and Marianna di Paolo. 1982. Learning through
     argument in a preschool. In Communicating in the Classroom,
     L.C. Wilkinson (ed.): 49-68. New York: Academic Press.
     Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to
     Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
     ---. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public
     Order. New York: Basic Books.
     Goodwin Charles and M.H. Goodwin. 1990. Interstitial argument.
     In Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, Grimshaw, Allen D. (ed.): 85.
     Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1978. Conversational practices in a
     peer group of urban black children. Unpublished Ph.D.
     dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of
     Pennsylvania.
     ---. 1980a. He-said-she said: formal cultural procedures for
     the construction of a gossip dispute activity. American
     Ethnologist, 7: 674-695.
     ---. 1980b. Directive / response speech sequences in girls’
     and boys’ task activities. In Women and Language in
     Literature and Society, S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, and
     N. Furman (eds.): 157-173. New York: Praeger.
     ---. 1982. Processes of dispute management among urban black
     children. American Ethnologist, 9: 76-69.
     Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Speech Act.
     Vol. 3 of Syntax and Semantics, P. Cole and J. Morgan
     (eds.). New York: Academic Press.
     Grimshaw, Allen D. 1990. Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic
     Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge:
     Cambridge University Press.
     Gu, Yueguo. 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese.
     Journal of Pragmatics 14: 237-257.
     Gunthner, Susanne. 1993. The Negotiation of Dissent in
     Intercultural Communication—an analysis of a Chinese-German
     conversation. Paper presented on the 4th International
     Pragmatics Conference. Kobe Japan.
     Ho, D.Y. F. 1975. On the Concept of Face. American Journal of
     Sociology 81.4: 867-884.
     Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, Men, and Politeness. New York:
     Longman.
     Hu, Hsien Chin. 1944. The Chinese Concept of ‘face’.
     American Anthropologist 46: 45-64.
     Huang, Shuanfan. 1984. Two studies on prototype semantics: xiao
     (filial piety) and mei mianzi (loss of face). A paper
     presented to the International Symposium on Psychological
     Aspects of the Chinese Language. Hong Kong, July 2-5, 1984.
     Hymes, Dell. 1972. On communicative competence. In
     Sociolinguistics, J. B. Pride and Janet Homes (eds.): 269-
     293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
     Kalick, Susan. 1975. ‘…like Ann’s gynaecologist or the time
     I was almost raped’—personal narratives in women’s rape
     groups. Journal of American Folklore 88: 3-11.
     Kasper, Gabriele. 1990. Linguistic politeness: current research
     issues. Journal of Pragmatics: Politeness, 193-218.
     Knoblauch, Hubert. 1991. The taming of foes: the avoidance of
     asymmetry I informal discussions. In Asymmetries in
     Dialogue, Ivana Markova and Klaus Foppa (eds.): 166-195.
     Hemel Hempstead: Barnes and Noble.
     Kotthoff, Helga. 1993. Disagreement and concession in disputes:
     On the context sensitivity of preference structures.
     Language in Society 22: 193-216.
     Krainer, Elizabeth. 1988. Challenges in a psychotherapy group.
     In Proceedings of the fourteenth Annual Meeting f the
     Berkeley Linguistics Society: 100-113.
     Kuo, Sai-hua. 1992. Formulaic opposition markers in Chinese
     conflict talk. Georgetown-University-Round-Table-on-
     Languages-and-Linguistics: 388-402.
     ---. 1997. Cooperation and competition in collaborative
     narration. Paper presented at the 6th International
     Conference on Language and Social Psychology, Ottawa,
     Canada, May 16-20, 1997.
     Lakoff, Robin. 1973. The logic of politeness: or, miniding your
     p’s and q’s. In Papers from the ninth regional meeting of
     the Chicago Linguistic Society, C. Corum et al. (eds.): 292-
     305. Chicago Linguistic Society.
     ---. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and
     Row.
     ---. 1977. What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics,
     and performatives. In Proceedings of The Texas Conference
     on Performatives, Presuppositions, and Implicatures, A. Rogers, B. Wall and J. Murphy (eds.): 79-105. Arlington:
     Center of Applied Linguistics.
     Lee David A. & Jennifer J. Peck. 1995. Troubled waters:
     Argument as sociability revisited. In Language in Society
     24: 29-52.
     Leech, Geoffrey. 1977. Langage and tact. L.A.U.T. Paper 46.
     Reprinted as Leech 1980, Language and Tact. Amsterdam:
     Benjamins.
     ---. 1980. Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics.
     Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     ---. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
     Leet-Pellegrini, H. M. 1980. Conversational dominance as a
     function of gender and expertise. In Language: Social
     Psychological Perspectives, Howard Giles, Peter Robinson and Philip Smith (eds.): 97-104. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Lein, L., & Brenneis, D. 1978. Children’s disputes in three
     speech communities. Language in Society, 7: 299-323.
     Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge
     University Press.
     Liao, Chao-chih. 1994. A Study on the Strategies, Maxims, and
     Development of Refusal in Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: The
     Crane Publishing CO., LTD.
     Lii-shih, Yu-hwei E. 1986. Conversational Politeness and
     Foreign Language Teaching. Taipei: Crane.
     Lii-shih, Yu-hwei E. 1994. What do “Yes” and “No” really
     mean in Chinese? In Georgetown University Round Table on
     Languages and Linguistics 1994, James E. Alatis (ed.), 128-
     149.
     Maltz, Daniel N. and Borker, Ruth A. 1982. A cultural approach
     to male-female miscommunication. In Language and Social
     Identity, John J. Gumperz (ed.): 196-216. Cambridge:
     Cambridge University Press.
     Maynard, Douglas W. 1985a. How children start arguments.
     Language in Society, 14: 1-29.
     ---. 1985b. On the functions of social conflict among
     children. American Sociological Review, 50: 207-223.
     Megaree, E. I. 1969. Influence of sex roles on the
     manifestation of leadership. In Journal of Applied
     Psychology 53, 5: 377-382.
     Munro, Fran. 1987. Female and male participation in small-group
     interaction in the ESOL classroom. Unpublished terms
     project. Graduate Diploma in TESOL. Sydney: Sydney College
     of Advanced Education.
     Muntigl, Peter and William, Turnbull. 1998. Conversational
     structures and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics
     29: 225-256.
     Naotsuka, Reiko, Nancy Sakamoto et al. 1981. Mutual
     Understanding of Different Cultures. Osaka: Taishukan.
     Pilkington, Jane. 1992. ‘Don’t try to make out that I’m
     nice!’ The different strategies women and men use when
     gossiping. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 37-
     60.
     Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with
     assessments: some features of preferred / dispreferred turn
     shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage. Eds. Structures
     of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. 57-
     101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Richards, Jack C. and M. Sukwiwat. 1983. Language transfer and
     conversational competence. Applied Linguistics 4.2: 113-125.
     Sacks, Harvey. 1973. The preference for agreement in natural
     conversation. Paper presented at the Linguistic Institute,
     Ann Arbor, Michigan.
     Schick Case, Susan. 1988. Cultural differences, not
     deficiencies: an analysis of managerial women’s language.
     In Women’s Careers: Pathways and Pitfalls, Suzanna Rose and
     Laurie Larwood (eds.): 41-63. New York: Praeger.
     Schiffrin, Deborah. 1984. Jewish argument as sociability.
     Language in Society, 13: 311-335.
     ---. 1985. Everyday argument: the organization of diversity in
     talk. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis 3: Discourse and
     Dialogue, T. van Dijk (ed.): 35-46. London: Academic Press.
     ---. 1987. Discourse Markers. New York: Cambridge University
     Press.
     Schmidt, Richards W. 1980. Review of questions and politeness
     in social interaction. In RELC 11(2): 100-114.
     Sell, Roger D. 1991. The politeness of literary texts. In
     Literary Pragmatics, R. Sell (ed.): 208-224. London:
     Routledge.
     Shils, Edward. 1968. Deference. In Social Stratification, J.
     A. Jackson (ed.): 104-132. Cambridge: Cambridge University
     Press.
     Simmel, George. 1949. The sociology of sociability. In
     American Journal of Sociology 55: 254-261.
     Stubbe, Maria. 1991. Talking at cross-purposes: the effect of
     gender on New Zealand primary schoolchildren’s interaction
     strategies in pair discussions. MA thesis. Wellington:
     Victoria University.
     Swacker, Marjorie. 1979. Women’s verbal behaviour at learned
     and profesinoal conferences. In The Sociology of the
     Languages of American Women, Berry-Lou Dubois and Isobel
     Crouch (eds.): 155-160. San Antonio, Tex.: Trinity
     University.
     Tannen Deborah. 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk
     among Friends. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing
     Corporation.
     ---. 1986. That’s Not What I Meant! How Conversational Style
     Makes or Breaks Your relations with Others. New York:
     William Morrow; London: J. M. Dent.
     ---. 1990. You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in
     Conversation. New York: William Morrow.
     ---. 1993. What’s in a frame?: Surface evidence for underlying
     expectations. In Framing in Discourse: 14-56. Oxford: Oxford
     University Press.
     Vuchinich, Samuel. 1988. The sequential organization of closing
     in verbal family conflict. In Conflict Talk, A.D. Grimshaw
     (ed.): 118-138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Wang, Yu-fang. 1997. Dispreferred Responses in Mandarin Chinese
     Conversation. In Proceedings of the First Symposium on
     Discourse and Syntax in Chinese and Formosan Languages: 103-
     134. Taipei: NTU.
     Watts, Richard J. 1992. Linguistic politeness and polite verbal
     behavior: reconsidering claims for university. In Trends in
     Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 59: Politeness in
     Language, Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich
     (eds.). Mouton De Gruyter.
     Watzlawick, Paul, Janet H. beavin, and don D. Jackson. 1967.
     Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional
     Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. New York: W.W. Norton.
     West, Candace and A. Garcia. 1988. Conversational shift work: a
     study of topical transitions between women and men. Social
     Problem 35.5: 551-75.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
85555007
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002001660
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 李櫻zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Li, Ying Cherry Dr.en_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林智怡zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lin, Zhi-Yien_US
dc.creator (作者) 林智怡zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Zhi-Yien_US
dc.date (日期) 1998en_US
dc.date.accessioned 27-Apr-2016 11:13:50 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 27-Apr-2016 11:13:50 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 27-Apr-2016 11:13:50 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002001660en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/86236-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 語言學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 85555007zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 國 立 政 治 大 學 研 究 所 碩 士 論 文 提 要zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Abstracten_US
dc.description.tableofcontents TABLE OF CONTENTS
      Page
     Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv
     Table of Contents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. v
     List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .vii
     List of Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .viii
     List of Conventions for Data Transcription . . . . . . . .. .ix
     Chinese Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
     English Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .xi
     Chapter 1 Introduction
     1.1 The Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
     1.2 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
     Chapter 2 Review of Literature
     2.1 Preference Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
     2.2 Face and Politeness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     2.2.1 Face . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
     2.2.2 Politeness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
     2.2.3 Four Views on Politeness . . . . . . . . . . .15
     2.2.4 Linguistic Politeness. . . . . . . . . . . . .17
     2.3 Disagreement Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
     2.3.1 Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
     2.3.2 Pragmatic Strategies. . . . . . . . . . . . .21
     2.3.3 Linguistic Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
     2.3.4 Gender Differences in Disagreement . . . . . .24
     Chapter 3 Methodology
     3.1 Review of Methods Used in Disagreement Studies . . . 29
     3.2 Methods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
     3.2.1 Data Collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30
     3.2.2 Sampling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
     3.2.3 Data Transcription. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
     3.2.4 Data Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32
     Chapter 4 Data Analysis
     4.1 Pragmatic Strategies in Disagreement . . . . . . . . 33
     4.1.1 Correction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33
     4.1.2 Account . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
     4.1.3 Challenge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34
     4.1.4 Clarification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35
     4.1.5 Defense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
     4.1.6 Evasion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36
     4.1.7 Partial Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
     4.1.8 Suggestion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
     4.1.9 Analysis of the Pragmatic Strategies . . . . .38
     4.2 Linguistic Features in Disagreement . . . . . . . . .44
     4.2.1 Question . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45
     4.2.2 Negation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45
     4.2.3 Repair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46
     4.2.4 Pre-Announcement Marker. . . . . . . . . . . .47
     4.2.5 Contrast Marker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
     4.2.6 Modal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
     4.2.7 Interjection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49
     4.2.8 Qualifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
     4.2.9 Interruption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50
     4.2.10 Long Pause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
     4.2.11 Analysis of the Linguistic Features . . . . .51
     4.3 Linguistic Maxims in Disagreement . . . . . . . . . .62
     4.4 Gender in Disagreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74
     4.4.1 Gender in Disagreement Frequency . . . . . . 74
     4.4.2 Gender in the Pragmatic Strategies of
     Disagreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .79
     4.4.3 Gender in the Linguistic Features of
     Disagreement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
     4.4.4 Gender in the Maxim Violation of
     Disagreement.. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
     Chapter 5 Conclusion
     5.1 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
     5.2 Limitations and Suggestions . . . . . . . . . . . .101
     Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002001660en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 異議zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中文對話zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 語用策略zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 語言特徵zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 合作 原則zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 禮貌原則zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 性別zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 衝突對話zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) disagreementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mandarin Chinese conversationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) pragmatic strategiesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) linguistic featuresen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) CPen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) PPen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) genderen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) conflict talken_US
dc.title (題名) 中文對話中的異議現象zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Disagreement in Mandarin Chinese Conversationen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bibliography
     Adger, Carolyn Temple. 1984. Communicative competence in the
     culturally diverse classroom: negotiating norms for
     linguistic interaction. In Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,
     linguistics. Georgetown University.
     Albee, E. 1962. Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf? New York:
     Atheneum.
     Aries, Elizabeth. 1976. Interaction patterns and themes of
     male, female and mixed groups. Small Group Behavior 7 (1): 7-
     18.
     Atkinson, Maxwell, and Heritage, John. 1984. Preference
     organization. In Structure of Social Action, Atkinson and Heritage (eds.): 53-56. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge
     University Press.
     Azuma, H., Hess, R. D., Kashin-gawa, K., and Conroy, M. 1980.
     Maternal control strategies and the child’s cognitive
     development: a cross-cultural paradox and its
     interpretation. Paper presented at the International
     Congress of Psychology. Leipzig.
     Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York:
     Ballantine.
     Beebe, L., & cummings, M. 1985. Speech act performance: A
     function of the data collection procedure? Paper presented
     at TESOL ’85, New York.
     Beebe, Leslie M. & Tomoko Takahashi. 1989. Sociolinguistic
     variation in face-threatening speech acts: chastisement and
     disagreement. In The Dynamic Interlanguage: Empirical
     Studies in Second Language Variation, Eisenstein, Mirian R..
     (ed.):199-218. New York: Plenum Press.
     Bilmes, Jack. 1988. The concept of preference in conversation
     analysis. In Language in society 17: 161-181.
     Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1990. You don’t touch lettuce with your
     fingers: Parental politensess in family discourse. Journal
     of Pragmatics: Politeness, 259-288.
     Boggs, Stephen T. 1978. The Development of verbal disputing in
     part-Hawaiian children. Language in Society, 7: 325-344.
     Brenneis, Donald. 1988. Language and disputing. Annual Review
     of Anthropology, 17: 221-237.
     Brenneis, Donald & Laura Lein. 1977. You fruithead: a
     sociolinguistic approach to children’s dispute settlement.
     In Child Discourse, S. Ervin-Tripp and C. Mitchell-Kernan
     (eds.): 49-65. New York: Academic Press.
     Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978/1987.
     Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge:
     Cambridge University Press.
     Coates, Jennifer. 1989. Gossip revisited: language in all-
     female groups. In Women in Their Speech Communities,
     Jennifer Coates and Deborah Cameron (eds.): 94-121. London:
     Longman.
     Edelsky, Carole. 1981. Who’s got the floor? Language in
     Society 10: 383-421.
     Eisenberg, Ann R. and Catherine Garvey. 1981. Children’s use
     of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse
     Processes, 4: 149-170.
     Fraser, Bruce. 1975. The concept of politeness. Paper presented
     at the 1985 NWAVE Meeting. Georgetown University.
     ---. 1990. Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics.
     14: 219-236.
     Fraser, Bruce and William Nolen. 1981. The association of
     deference with linguistic form. International Journal of
     the Sociology of Language 27: 93-109.
     Genishi, Celia and Marianna di Paolo. 1982. Learning through
     argument in a preschool. In Communicating in the Classroom,
     L.C. Wilkinson (ed.): 49-68. New York: Academic Press.
     Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to
     Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
     ---. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public
     Order. New York: Basic Books.
     Goodwin Charles and M.H. Goodwin. 1990. Interstitial argument.
     In Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, Grimshaw, Allen D. (ed.): 85.
     Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1978. Conversational practices in a
     peer group of urban black children. Unpublished Ph.D.
     dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of
     Pennsylvania.
     ---. 1980a. He-said-she said: formal cultural procedures for
     the construction of a gossip dispute activity. American
     Ethnologist, 7: 674-695.
     ---. 1980b. Directive / response speech sequences in girls’
     and boys’ task activities. In Women and Language in
     Literature and Society, S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, and
     N. Furman (eds.): 157-173. New York: Praeger.
     ---. 1982. Processes of dispute management among urban black
     children. American Ethnologist, 9: 76-69.
     Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Speech Act.
     Vol. 3 of Syntax and Semantics, P. Cole and J. Morgan
     (eds.). New York: Academic Press.
     Grimshaw, Allen D. 1990. Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic
     Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge:
     Cambridge University Press.
     Gu, Yueguo. 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese.
     Journal of Pragmatics 14: 237-257.
     Gunthner, Susanne. 1993. The Negotiation of Dissent in
     Intercultural Communication—an analysis of a Chinese-German
     conversation. Paper presented on the 4th International
     Pragmatics Conference. Kobe Japan.
     Ho, D.Y. F. 1975. On the Concept of Face. American Journal of
     Sociology 81.4: 867-884.
     Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, Men, and Politeness. New York:
     Longman.
     Hu, Hsien Chin. 1944. The Chinese Concept of ‘face’.
     American Anthropologist 46: 45-64.
     Huang, Shuanfan. 1984. Two studies on prototype semantics: xiao
     (filial piety) and mei mianzi (loss of face). A paper
     presented to the International Symposium on Psychological
     Aspects of the Chinese Language. Hong Kong, July 2-5, 1984.
     Hymes, Dell. 1972. On communicative competence. In
     Sociolinguistics, J. B. Pride and Janet Homes (eds.): 269-
     293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
     Kalick, Susan. 1975. ‘…like Ann’s gynaecologist or the time
     I was almost raped’—personal narratives in women’s rape
     groups. Journal of American Folklore 88: 3-11.
     Kasper, Gabriele. 1990. Linguistic politeness: current research
     issues. Journal of Pragmatics: Politeness, 193-218.
     Knoblauch, Hubert. 1991. The taming of foes: the avoidance of
     asymmetry I informal discussions. In Asymmetries in
     Dialogue, Ivana Markova and Klaus Foppa (eds.): 166-195.
     Hemel Hempstead: Barnes and Noble.
     Kotthoff, Helga. 1993. Disagreement and concession in disputes:
     On the context sensitivity of preference structures.
     Language in Society 22: 193-216.
     Krainer, Elizabeth. 1988. Challenges in a psychotherapy group.
     In Proceedings of the fourteenth Annual Meeting f the
     Berkeley Linguistics Society: 100-113.
     Kuo, Sai-hua. 1992. Formulaic opposition markers in Chinese
     conflict talk. Georgetown-University-Round-Table-on-
     Languages-and-Linguistics: 388-402.
     ---. 1997. Cooperation and competition in collaborative
     narration. Paper presented at the 6th International
     Conference on Language and Social Psychology, Ottawa,
     Canada, May 16-20, 1997.
     Lakoff, Robin. 1973. The logic of politeness: or, miniding your
     p’s and q’s. In Papers from the ninth regional meeting of
     the Chicago Linguistic Society, C. Corum et al. (eds.): 292-
     305. Chicago Linguistic Society.
     ---. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and
     Row.
     ---. 1977. What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics,
     and performatives. In Proceedings of The Texas Conference
     on Performatives, Presuppositions, and Implicatures, A. Rogers, B. Wall and J. Murphy (eds.): 79-105. Arlington:
     Center of Applied Linguistics.
     Lee David A. & Jennifer J. Peck. 1995. Troubled waters:
     Argument as sociability revisited. In Language in Society
     24: 29-52.
     Leech, Geoffrey. 1977. Langage and tact. L.A.U.T. Paper 46.
     Reprinted as Leech 1980, Language and Tact. Amsterdam:
     Benjamins.
     ---. 1980. Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics.
     Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     ---. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
     Leet-Pellegrini, H. M. 1980. Conversational dominance as a
     function of gender and expertise. In Language: Social
     Psychological Perspectives, Howard Giles, Peter Robinson and Philip Smith (eds.): 97-104. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Lein, L., & Brenneis, D. 1978. Children’s disputes in three
     speech communities. Language in Society, 7: 299-323.
     Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge
     University Press.
     Liao, Chao-chih. 1994. A Study on the Strategies, Maxims, and
     Development of Refusal in Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: The
     Crane Publishing CO., LTD.
     Lii-shih, Yu-hwei E. 1986. Conversational Politeness and
     Foreign Language Teaching. Taipei: Crane.
     Lii-shih, Yu-hwei E. 1994. What do “Yes” and “No” really
     mean in Chinese? In Georgetown University Round Table on
     Languages and Linguistics 1994, James E. Alatis (ed.), 128-
     149.
     Maltz, Daniel N. and Borker, Ruth A. 1982. A cultural approach
     to male-female miscommunication. In Language and Social
     Identity, John J. Gumperz (ed.): 196-216. Cambridge:
     Cambridge University Press.
     Maynard, Douglas W. 1985a. How children start arguments.
     Language in Society, 14: 1-29.
     ---. 1985b. On the functions of social conflict among
     children. American Sociological Review, 50: 207-223.
     Megaree, E. I. 1969. Influence of sex roles on the
     manifestation of leadership. In Journal of Applied
     Psychology 53, 5: 377-382.
     Munro, Fran. 1987. Female and male participation in small-group
     interaction in the ESOL classroom. Unpublished terms
     project. Graduate Diploma in TESOL. Sydney: Sydney College
     of Advanced Education.
     Muntigl, Peter and William, Turnbull. 1998. Conversational
     structures and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics
     29: 225-256.
     Naotsuka, Reiko, Nancy Sakamoto et al. 1981. Mutual
     Understanding of Different Cultures. Osaka: Taishukan.
     Pilkington, Jane. 1992. ‘Don’t try to make out that I’m
     nice!’ The different strategies women and men use when
     gossiping. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 37-
     60.
     Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with
     assessments: some features of preferred / dispreferred turn
     shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage. Eds. Structures
     of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. 57-
     101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Richards, Jack C. and M. Sukwiwat. 1983. Language transfer and
     conversational competence. Applied Linguistics 4.2: 113-125.
     Sacks, Harvey. 1973. The preference for agreement in natural
     conversation. Paper presented at the Linguistic Institute,
     Ann Arbor, Michigan.
     Schick Case, Susan. 1988. Cultural differences, not
     deficiencies: an analysis of managerial women’s language.
     In Women’s Careers: Pathways and Pitfalls, Suzanna Rose and
     Laurie Larwood (eds.): 41-63. New York: Praeger.
     Schiffrin, Deborah. 1984. Jewish argument as sociability.
     Language in Society, 13: 311-335.
     ---. 1985. Everyday argument: the organization of diversity in
     talk. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis 3: Discourse and
     Dialogue, T. van Dijk (ed.): 35-46. London: Academic Press.
     ---. 1987. Discourse Markers. New York: Cambridge University
     Press.
     Schmidt, Richards W. 1980. Review of questions and politeness
     in social interaction. In RELC 11(2): 100-114.
     Sell, Roger D. 1991. The politeness of literary texts. In
     Literary Pragmatics, R. Sell (ed.): 208-224. London:
     Routledge.
     Shils, Edward. 1968. Deference. In Social Stratification, J.
     A. Jackson (ed.): 104-132. Cambridge: Cambridge University
     Press.
     Simmel, George. 1949. The sociology of sociability. In
     American Journal of Sociology 55: 254-261.
     Stubbe, Maria. 1991. Talking at cross-purposes: the effect of
     gender on New Zealand primary schoolchildren’s interaction
     strategies in pair discussions. MA thesis. Wellington:
     Victoria University.
     Swacker, Marjorie. 1979. Women’s verbal behaviour at learned
     and profesinoal conferences. In The Sociology of the
     Languages of American Women, Berry-Lou Dubois and Isobel
     Crouch (eds.): 155-160. San Antonio, Tex.: Trinity
     University.
     Tannen Deborah. 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk
     among Friends. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing
     Corporation.
     ---. 1986. That’s Not What I Meant! How Conversational Style
     Makes or Breaks Your relations with Others. New York:
     William Morrow; London: J. M. Dent.
     ---. 1990. You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in
     Conversation. New York: William Morrow.
     ---. 1993. What’s in a frame?: Surface evidence for underlying
     expectations. In Framing in Discourse: 14-56. Oxford: Oxford
     University Press.
     Vuchinich, Samuel. 1988. The sequential organization of closing
     in verbal family conflict. In Conflict Talk, A.D. Grimshaw
     (ed.): 118-138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Wang, Yu-fang. 1997. Dispreferred Responses in Mandarin Chinese
     Conversation. In Proceedings of the First Symposium on
     Discourse and Syntax in Chinese and Formosan Languages: 103-
     134. Taipei: NTU.
     Watts, Richard J. 1992. Linguistic politeness and polite verbal
     behavior: reconsidering claims for university. In Trends in
     Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 59: Politeness in
     Language, Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich
     (eds.). Mouton De Gruyter.
     Watzlawick, Paul, Janet H. beavin, and don D. Jackson. 1967.
     Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional
     Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. New York: W.W. Norton.
     West, Candace and A. Garcia. 1988. Conversational shift work: a
     study of topical transitions between women and men. Social
     Problem 35.5: 551-75.		zh_TW