Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 產業活動中的政府角色:以台灣的電子業為例
The role of state in industry development: the case of electronic industry in Taiwan.作者 陳景堯
Chen, Jin-Yao貢獻者 黃德福
Hwang,Teh-Fu
陳景堯
Chen, Jin-Yao關鍵詞 國家機關
經濟發展
國家中心研途徑
部門別的分析
電子工業
產業管治機制
State
Economic development
State-centric approach
Sectoral analysis
Electronic industry
Industry govenrance mechanism日期 1996 上傳時間 28-Apr-2016 13:37:47 (UTC+8) 摘要 隨著生產內容的殊異及分工的日趨細密,當代的經濟活動,已走入一個市場高度分化而生產部門化的階段,我們已無法再以單一的「國家--市場」的模式,來探究政治與經濟的關係。在現實世界中,國家對經濟的管制,是透過政府與市場中各個權力與利益殊異產業部門的互動而完成的,每一個產業部門,基於不同的生產特性、行銷策略、產業結構乃至市場地位,都會形成一個獨特的政策範疇,來規限(或強化)國家機關權力的行使,或對政策工具造成不同程度的扭曲(或擴大),從而使得政府在面對該產業時,扮演特定的角色及功能。然而在政治經濟學的研究中,我們卻仍傾向從宏觀的角度,以「國家--市場」的二元結構,來試圖賦予政府在整體產業活動中一個一致性的描述,也此造成在解釋及預測上的侷限。在這樣的觀
Mordern economic activity is highly differentiation in producing and marketing processes by sectors.We can no longer take an unique "state-market" mode to observe and interpretation the complex relationship between state andmarket.In the real world, any government restrictions on economic activityis in參考文獻 英文部分 Amsden, Alice H. 1979, “ Taiwan`s economic history: a case of etatisme and a challenge to dependency theory," Mordern China, Vo1.5(3),pp _341-80. 1985, liThe state and Taiwan`s economic development. “ in Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. ed., Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge Univ Press. pp. 78-106. Alt,James E. & Alec Chrystal 1983, Political Economics.Berkely,C.A.: Univ of California Press. Atkinson Michael M. & William D. Coleman. 1989," Strong States and Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks In Advanced Capitalist Economies," British Journal oj Political Science .(19),pp.47-67. Balassa,Bela. 1981, The Newly Industrializing Countries in the World Ecoonomy .New York:Pergamon. Balassa, Bela.,et aI. 1982, Developmant Strategies in Semi-industrial Economies. Bartimore : The John Hopkins Univ Press. Barrett, Richard E. 1990, "Autonomy and diversity in the American tstate on Taiwan." in Ediwn A. Winckler and Susan Greenhalgh ed. Contending Approaches to the Political Rconomy of Taiwan. London:M.E. Sharpe,Inc. Barrett, Richard E & Martin K. Whyte. 1982, “Depedency theory and Taiwan: analysis of a deviant case, "American Journal of Soiology, VoI.87(5), pp.l064-89. Bhagwati, J. 1988, "Export-promoting trade strategy: Issue and evidence," World Bank Research Obersever, Vo1.3(l), pp27-57. Caporaso, James A. & David P. Levine 1992, Theories of Political Economy. New York: Cambridge Univ Press. Cardoso,Fernando H. 1972, "Dependent and Development in Latin America. "New Left Review. Vol. 74(Aug).pp.83-95. 1973," Associated-Dependent Development:Theoritical and Practical Implications. "in Alfred Stepan ed. Authoritarain Brazil.New Haven: Yale Univ Press.pp.142-76. 1977, "The Consumption of Depnedency Theory in the United States." Latin American Research Review. Vol. 12(3).pp.7-24. 1979, "On the Characterlizaion of Authoritarian Regime in Latin America" in David Collier ed., The New Authoritarianism in Latin America,Princeton:Princeton Univ Press.pp.33-57. Cardoso, Fernando H. & Enzo Faletto. 1979, Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: Univ.of California Press. Chang,Chung-Chau. 1992, "The development of Taiwan`s personal computer industry." in N. T. Wang ed. Taiwan`s Enterprises in Gobal Perspective. New York: M.E. Sharpe,Inc. Chen, E. K. 1979, Hyper-growth in Asian Economies: A Comparative Study of Hong Kong,Singarpore and Taiwan. London: Macmillian. Chilcote, Ronald H. 1981 ,Theories of Comparative Politics: The Search for a Paradigm. Boulder,Colorado: Westview. Chu,Yun-han. 1989," State Structure and Economic Adjustment of the East Asian Newly Industrilizing Countries," International Organization vol.43( 4) ,pp. 647-72. Chou,Yu-Jen 1994,”The political underpinnings of economic development in “法商學報, No.29.pp459-507. Cumings, Bruce. 1984, “ The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy : industrial sectors, product cycles and political consequences," International Organization, Vo1.38(1),pp,1-40. Deyo,Frederic C. 1987, “ Coalition, Institutions, and Linkage Sequenceing: T oward a Strateagic Capacity Model of East Asian. “ in Frederic C.Deyo,ed The Political Economy of New Asian Indusrtrailism.Ithca & Lodon:Cornell Univ Press,pp227-47. Evnas,Peter B. 1979, Depedent Development: The Alliance of Multinational,State and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton Univ Press. 1987, “ Classs, State and Dependence in East Asia: Lesson for Latin Americanist," in Frederic C. Deyo, ed. The Political Economy of New Asian Industrialism. Ithca and London: Cornell Univ Press.pp.203-26. Evans,Peter B. & Dietrich Rueschmeyer. 1985,”The State and Economic Transformation: Toward an Analysis of the Conditions Underlying Effective Intervention. “ in Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. ed., Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge Univ Press. Evans,Peter B. & John D. Stephen. 1988, “ Studying Development since the Sixities: The Emergence of Comparative Political EconomY,1I Theory and Society, Vol. 17,pp. 713-45 . Frank,Andre Gunder. 1969, Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution. New York: Monthly Review Press. 1973,The Development of Underdevelopment. New York: Monthly Review Press. Gilpin,Robert. 1987,The Political Economy of International Relations.New York: Princeton Univ Press. Gold, Thomas B. 1986, State and Society in the Tahyan Miracle. Armonk, New York: M.E. Shrape. 1990, "Entrepreurs,Multinationals,and the State," in Edwin Winkler & Susan Greenhalgh. ed., Contending Approaches to the Political Economy oj TahYan. New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc. Haggard,S tephan. 1990`pathway from the Periphery:the Politics oj Growth in theNewly Industrialing Countries . !thea & London: Cornell Univ Press. Haggard,Stephan & Chung-In Moon. 1990, "Institution and Economic Policy: Theory and Korean Case Study." World Polictcs. Vo1.42(2). pp.20 1-3 3. Hall,Peter. 1986, Governing the Economy.New York Oxford Univ Press. Hamilton,Nora. 1981, " State autonomy and depedent capitalism in Latin America, "British Journal of Sociology. Vo1.32(3),pp305-29. Harris, Nigel. 1983,The End of the Thrid World: Newly Industrializing Countries and the Decline of An Ideology.New York:Pengiun Book,Inc. Johnson, Chalmers. 1982, MITI and Japanese Miracle. Stanford: Stanford Univ Press. 1987, "Political Insititution and Economic Performanee:The Government-Business Relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan." in Frederic C. Deyo, ed.The Political Economy oj New Asian Industrialism. Ithea and London: Cornell Univ Press.pp.136-164. Katzenstein,Peter. 1985,Smal! States in world markets.Ithca: Cornell Univ Press. Kitschelt,Herbert. 1991," Industrial Goverance Structure, innovation strategies, and the case of Japan: sector or cross-national comparative analysis?" International Organization, Vo1.45( 4),pp.453-93. Koo, Hagen. 1987, “ The Interplay of State, Social Class and World System in East Asian Development: The Case of South Korea and Taiwan." in Frederic Deyo ed.The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism" pp.165-81. Krasner,Stephan D. 1984, “ Approach to the state: alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. “ Comparative Politics. Vol. 16(1 ),pp.223-46. Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1984,”Concertation and the structure of corporatist network “ ,in John H. Goldthrope. ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press. pp. 66-80. Li, K. T. 1976, The Experience of Dynamic Growth on Taiwan. Taipei: Meiya. Lindblom, Charles E. 1977, Politics and Markets: the World`s Political-Economic System. NewYork:Basic Book,Inc. IvleaneY,Constance S. 1989,”State policy and the development of Taiwan`s semi-cnoductor industry. “ paper present at conference on State Policy and Eonomic Development in Taiwan, R.O.c., Co-sponsor by `Soochow Univ and Univ of California at Los Angles.Taipei,Dec 4-5. Nester, William. 1991,Japanese Industrial Trageting : The Neomercantilist Path to Economic Superpower.London: Macmilliam Press. Nordlinger,Eric A. 1981, On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge: Harvard Univ Press. Nurkes, P. 1953,Problems of Capital Formation in Uderdevelopment Cuntries.New York: Oxford Univ press. O`connor, David C. 1985, "The computer industry in the third world: policy option and constraints." World Development. Vo1.13(3),pp.311-322. Onis,Ziya. 1991,"The logic of the developmnetal states."Comparative Politics, (Oct).pp.109- 126. Pang,Chien-Kuo. 1992,The State and Economic Transformation: The Taiwan Case. New York: Garland Plubshing Inc. Patrick,Hughes. 1977,"The future of the Japanese economy: output and productivity. " Journal of Japanese Studies,vo1.3(2). pp147-54. Poter,Michael E 1990, The Competetive Advantage of Nations. Lodon:MacmilIan Press. Ranis, Gustiva. 1988," The evolution of policy in comparative perspectives." in K. T. Li,ed.an evolution of Policy Behind Taiwan1s Development Sucess. New York: Yale Univ Press. I 988 . Rostow,W.W. 1971,Politics and the Stage of Growth.New York:Cambridge Univ Press. Saxonhouse, G. 1983, "What is all this about` industrial targetting` in Japan? " World Economy, vo1.6(3), pp.253-73. Santos Dos, Theotonio. 1970, " The structure of dependence," American Economic Review. Vo1.60(2).pp.231-6. Schmitter, Philippe C. 1974," Still the century of corporatism?" Review of Politics. Vo1.36(1). pp . 85- 131. Simon,Dennis F. 1990, "Techology transfer and national autonomy." in Edwin Winkler & Susan Greenhalgh. ed., Contending Approaches to the Political Economy of Taiwan. New York: M.E. Sharpe,Inc. Singer, Hans. 1950,tlThe distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. "American Economic Review.No.40.pp.73-85. Singer, Hans. & P. Gray 1988, " Trade policy and growth of developing countries: some new data ," World Development, Vol. 16(3),pp.395-403.0 Skocpol, Theda. 1979,State and Social Revolutions: A Comparativer Analysis of France ,Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press. 1985," Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research," in Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. ed., Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge Univ Press. Spainer,John. 1984,Games Nations Play : Analyzing International Politics.New York: Holt ,Reinhart and Winston. Stepan,A1fred 1978,The State and Societ.· Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton:Princeton Univ Press. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 1988, Economics of the Public Sector. New York:W.W. Norton & Company ,2nd edtion. Thirlwall, A.P. 1989, Growth and Development: With Special Referance to Developing Economies. London: Macmillan Education Ltd. 4th,edtion. Todaro, M.P. 1989,Economic Development in the Third World.New York:Longman. Wade, Robert. 1988,"State Interventions in Outward-Looking Development: Neo-Classical Theory and Taiwan`s Practice." in G.White ed. Developmental State in East Asia.London: Macmillian. 1990, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Governmant in East Asian Industrialization. New Jersey: Princeton Univ Press. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979, The Capitalist World-Economy. New York: Cambridge Univ Press. Wang, Vicent Wei-cheng 1994, "High-Tech Paths and Economic Development Comparing NICs Accommodative and Assertive Strategies. “ 政治學報, Vo1.22 ,June , 1994,pp.141-180. World Bank. 1993,The East Asian Miracle:Econmic Growthand Public PolicyNew York:Oxford Univ Press. Wikes,Stephen. & Maurice Wright. 1987, Comparative Government-Indllstrial Relations.Oxford:Clarendo Press. Wincklet,Edwin A. 1984, "Institutionalization and particIpation on Taiwan: from hard to soft authoritarianism?"China Quater/y,No.99. pp.481-499. Wright,Maurice. 1988," Policy Community, Policy Network and Comparative Industrial Policies," Political Studies. Vo1.19,pp.593-612. Wu,Se-Hwa. 1992, "The dynamic cooperation between government and enterprise: the development of Taiwan`s integrate circuit industry." in N.T. ed.Taiwan`s Enterprises in Gobal Perspective. New York: M.E. Sharpe,Inc. Z ysman,J ohn. 1986, Government ,Markets and Growth: Finanxial System and the Politics of Industrial Change. Oxford: Martin Robertson. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
政治學系
81252010資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002703 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 黃德福 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Hwang,Teh-Fu en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳景堯 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Jin-Yao en_US dc.creator (作者) 陳景堯 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chen, Jin-Yao en_US dc.date (日期) 1996 en_US dc.date.accessioned 28-Apr-2016 13:37:47 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 28-Apr-2016 13:37:47 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 28-Apr-2016 13:37:47 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002002703 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/87382 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 政治學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 81252010 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著生產內容的殊異及分工的日趨細密,當代的經濟活動,已走入一個市場高度分化而生產部門化的階段,我們已無法再以單一的「國家--市場」的模式,來探究政治與經濟的關係。在現實世界中,國家對經濟的管制,是透過政府與市場中各個權力與利益殊異產業部門的互動而完成的,每一個產業部門,基於不同的生產特性、行銷策略、產業結構乃至市場地位,都會形成一個獨特的政策範疇,來規限(或強化)國家機關權力的行使,或對政策工具造成不同程度的扭曲(或擴大),從而使得政府在面對該產業時,扮演特定的角色及功能。然而在政治經濟學的研究中,我們卻仍傾向從宏觀的角度,以「國家--市場」的二元結構,來試圖賦予政府在整體產業活動中一個一致性的描述,也此造成在解釋及預測上的侷限。在這樣的觀 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Mordern economic activity is highly differentiation in producing and marketing processes by sectors.We can no longer take an unique "state-market" mode to observe and interpretation the complex relationship between state andmarket.In the real world, any government restrictions on economic activityis in en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章緒論..........1 第一節研究動機..........1 第二節國家介入經濟活動的相關討論..........2 第三節分析架構與研究方法..........10 壹、分析層次與研究範圍..........10 貳、分析架構..........13 參、研究途行與方法..........16 肆、分析單元與分析時期的界定..........17 第四節論文章節安排..........19 第二章市場、國家與經濟發展..........21 第一節市場與國家、企業與政府..........21 第二節經濟發展的研究途徑..........24 壹、結構學派的興衰..........26 貳、市場中心論:新古典經濟學派..........28 參、歷史結構論:依賴理論的傳統..........32 肆、社會中心論:新統合主義..........36 伍、國家中心論:國家是一個行為者或制度?..........41 第三節政府角色的差異性與變動性..........47 壹、產業管治機制的概念..........48 貳、政府角色的差異性與變動性..........49 第三章前策略性工業政策時期台灣電工業的發展..........53 第一節強勢國家機關的形成..........53 第二節出口導向政策的推動..........59 壹、發展策略的轉向..........59 貳、推動出口導向發展的國家機關..........60 第三節出口導向政策下台灣電子工業的萌芽..........65 壹、出口導向政策時期電子零件業的發展..........65 貳、出口導向政策時期家電業的萌芽..........74 第四節第二次進口替代政策的形成..........83 壹、外交的孤立與經濟的挑戰..........83 貳、推動第二次進口替代的國家機關..........84 第五節第二次進口替代政策時期台灣電子工業的發展..........89 壹、第二次進口替代時期的家電業..........89 第六節小結..........95 第四章策略性工業時期台灣電子工業的成長..........97 第一節策略性工業政策的推動..........97 壹、策略性工業政策概念的出現與轉變..........97 貳、經濟計劃機構:再度走向集權制的設計..........99 參、各項政策工具的運用..........101 第二節策略性工業政策時期台灣電子業的發展..........105 壹、策略性工業政策下家電業的發展..........107 貳、策略性工業政策時期的個人電腦業..........115 參、策略性工業政策下的積體電路產業..........123 第三節小結..........130 第五章自由化政策後台灣電子工業的演變..........133 第一節自由化政策的實行..........133 壹、美國壓力下所推動的經濟自由化..........134 貳、自由化時期的國家機關..........137 第二節自由化政策對台灣電子工業的衝擊..........139 壹、自由化政策下的電子零件業..........139 貳、自由化政策對家電業的衝擊..........145 參、自由化政策時期個人電腦業的發展..........150 肆、自由化政策時期積體電路業的發展..........157 第三節產業升級政策下台灣電子工業的未來..........164 壹、產業生產的外移:空洞化的警訊或是國際化的必然?..........164 貳、推動產業升級政策的國家機關..........167 參、產業升級政策下台灣電子業的未來..........167 第四節小結..........183 第六章結論..........187 第一節研究發現..........187 第二節檢討與建議..........196 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002703 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國家機關 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 經濟發展 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國家中心研途徑 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 部門別的分析 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 電子工業 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 產業管治機制 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) State en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Economic development en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) State-centric approach en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Sectoral analysis en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Electronic industry en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Industry govenrance mechanism en_US dc.title (題名) 產業活動中的政府角色:以台灣的電子業為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The role of state in industry development: the case of electronic industry in Taiwan. en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分 Amsden, Alice H. 1979, “ Taiwan`s economic history: a case of etatisme and a challenge to dependency theory," Mordern China, Vo1.5(3),pp _341-80. 1985, liThe state and Taiwan`s economic development. “ in Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. ed., Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge Univ Press. pp. 78-106. Alt,James E. & Alec Chrystal 1983, Political Economics.Berkely,C.A.: Univ of California Press. Atkinson Michael M. & William D. Coleman. 1989," Strong States and Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks In Advanced Capitalist Economies," British Journal oj Political Science .(19),pp.47-67. Balassa,Bela. 1981, The Newly Industrializing Countries in the World Ecoonomy .New York:Pergamon. Balassa, Bela.,et aI. 1982, Developmant Strategies in Semi-industrial Economies. Bartimore : The John Hopkins Univ Press. Barrett, Richard E. 1990, "Autonomy and diversity in the American tstate on Taiwan." in Ediwn A. Winckler and Susan Greenhalgh ed. Contending Approaches to the Political Rconomy of Taiwan. London:M.E. Sharpe,Inc. Barrett, Richard E & Martin K. Whyte. 1982, “Depedency theory and Taiwan: analysis of a deviant case, "American Journal of Soiology, VoI.87(5), pp.l064-89. Bhagwati, J. 1988, "Export-promoting trade strategy: Issue and evidence," World Bank Research Obersever, Vo1.3(l), pp27-57. Caporaso, James A. & David P. Levine 1992, Theories of Political Economy. New York: Cambridge Univ Press. Cardoso,Fernando H. 1972, "Dependent and Development in Latin America. "New Left Review. Vol. 74(Aug).pp.83-95. 1973," Associated-Dependent Development:Theoritical and Practical Implications. "in Alfred Stepan ed. Authoritarain Brazil.New Haven: Yale Univ Press.pp.142-76. 1977, "The Consumption of Depnedency Theory in the United States." Latin American Research Review. Vol. 12(3).pp.7-24. 1979, "On the Characterlizaion of Authoritarian Regime in Latin America" in David Collier ed., The New Authoritarianism in Latin America,Princeton:Princeton Univ Press.pp.33-57. Cardoso, Fernando H. & Enzo Faletto. 1979, Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: Univ.of California Press. Chang,Chung-Chau. 1992, "The development of Taiwan`s personal computer industry." in N. T. Wang ed. Taiwan`s Enterprises in Gobal Perspective. New York: M.E. Sharpe,Inc. Chen, E. K. 1979, Hyper-growth in Asian Economies: A Comparative Study of Hong Kong,Singarpore and Taiwan. London: Macmillian. Chilcote, Ronald H. 1981 ,Theories of Comparative Politics: The Search for a Paradigm. Boulder,Colorado: Westview. Chu,Yun-han. 1989," State Structure and Economic Adjustment of the East Asian Newly Industrilizing Countries," International Organization vol.43( 4) ,pp. 647-72. Chou,Yu-Jen 1994,”The political underpinnings of economic development in “法商學報, No.29.pp459-507. Cumings, Bruce. 1984, “ The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy : industrial sectors, product cycles and political consequences," International Organization, Vo1.38(1),pp,1-40. Deyo,Frederic C. 1987, “ Coalition, Institutions, and Linkage Sequenceing: T oward a Strateagic Capacity Model of East Asian. “ in Frederic C.Deyo,ed The Political Economy of New Asian Indusrtrailism.Ithca & Lodon:Cornell Univ Press,pp227-47. Evnas,Peter B. 1979, Depedent Development: The Alliance of Multinational,State and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton Univ Press. 1987, “ Classs, State and Dependence in East Asia: Lesson for Latin Americanist," in Frederic C. Deyo, ed. The Political Economy of New Asian Industrialism. Ithca and London: Cornell Univ Press.pp.203-26. Evans,Peter B. & Dietrich Rueschmeyer. 1985,”The State and Economic Transformation: Toward an Analysis of the Conditions Underlying Effective Intervention. “ in Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. ed., Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge Univ Press. Evans,Peter B. & John D. Stephen. 1988, “ Studying Development since the Sixities: The Emergence of Comparative Political EconomY,1I Theory and Society, Vol. 17,pp. 713-45 . Frank,Andre Gunder. 1969, Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution. New York: Monthly Review Press. 1973,The Development of Underdevelopment. New York: Monthly Review Press. Gilpin,Robert. 1987,The Political Economy of International Relations.New York: Princeton Univ Press. Gold, Thomas B. 1986, State and Society in the Tahyan Miracle. Armonk, New York: M.E. Shrape. 1990, "Entrepreurs,Multinationals,and the State," in Edwin Winkler & Susan Greenhalgh. ed., Contending Approaches to the Political Economy oj TahYan. New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc. Haggard,S tephan. 1990`pathway from the Periphery:the Politics oj Growth in theNewly Industrialing Countries . !thea & London: Cornell Univ Press. Haggard,Stephan & Chung-In Moon. 1990, "Institution and Economic Policy: Theory and Korean Case Study." World Polictcs. Vo1.42(2). pp.20 1-3 3. Hall,Peter. 1986, Governing the Economy.New York Oxford Univ Press. Hamilton,Nora. 1981, " State autonomy and depedent capitalism in Latin America, "British Journal of Sociology. Vo1.32(3),pp305-29. Harris, Nigel. 1983,The End of the Thrid World: Newly Industrializing Countries and the Decline of An Ideology.New York:Pengiun Book,Inc. Johnson, Chalmers. 1982, MITI and Japanese Miracle. Stanford: Stanford Univ Press. 1987, "Political Insititution and Economic Performanee:The Government-Business Relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan." in Frederic C. Deyo, ed.The Political Economy oj New Asian Industrialism. Ithea and London: Cornell Univ Press.pp.136-164. Katzenstein,Peter. 1985,Smal! States in world markets.Ithca: Cornell Univ Press. Kitschelt,Herbert. 1991," Industrial Goverance Structure, innovation strategies, and the case of Japan: sector or cross-national comparative analysis?" International Organization, Vo1.45( 4),pp.453-93. Koo, Hagen. 1987, “ The Interplay of State, Social Class and World System in East Asian Development: The Case of South Korea and Taiwan." in Frederic Deyo ed.The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism" pp.165-81. Krasner,Stephan D. 1984, “ Approach to the state: alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. “ Comparative Politics. Vol. 16(1 ),pp.223-46. Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1984,”Concertation and the structure of corporatist network “ ,in John H. Goldthrope. ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press. pp. 66-80. Li, K. T. 1976, The Experience of Dynamic Growth on Taiwan. Taipei: Meiya. Lindblom, Charles E. 1977, Politics and Markets: the World`s Political-Economic System. NewYork:Basic Book,Inc. IvleaneY,Constance S. 1989,”State policy and the development of Taiwan`s semi-cnoductor industry. “ paper present at conference on State Policy and Eonomic Development in Taiwan, R.O.c., Co-sponsor by `Soochow Univ and Univ of California at Los Angles.Taipei,Dec 4-5. Nester, William. 1991,Japanese Industrial Trageting : The Neomercantilist Path to Economic Superpower.London: Macmilliam Press. Nordlinger,Eric A. 1981, On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge: Harvard Univ Press. Nurkes, P. 1953,Problems of Capital Formation in Uderdevelopment Cuntries.New York: Oxford Univ press. O`connor, David C. 1985, "The computer industry in the third world: policy option and constraints." World Development. Vo1.13(3),pp.311-322. Onis,Ziya. 1991,"The logic of the developmnetal states."Comparative Politics, (Oct).pp.109- 126. Pang,Chien-Kuo. 1992,The State and Economic Transformation: The Taiwan Case. New York: Garland Plubshing Inc. Patrick,Hughes. 1977,"The future of the Japanese economy: output and productivity. " Journal of Japanese Studies,vo1.3(2). pp147-54. Poter,Michael E 1990, The Competetive Advantage of Nations. Lodon:MacmilIan Press. Ranis, Gustiva. 1988," The evolution of policy in comparative perspectives." in K. T. Li,ed.an evolution of Policy Behind Taiwan1s Development Sucess. New York: Yale Univ Press. I 988 . Rostow,W.W. 1971,Politics and the Stage of Growth.New York:Cambridge Univ Press. Saxonhouse, G. 1983, "What is all this about` industrial targetting` in Japan? " World Economy, vo1.6(3), pp.253-73. Santos Dos, Theotonio. 1970, " The structure of dependence," American Economic Review. Vo1.60(2).pp.231-6. Schmitter, Philippe C. 1974," Still the century of corporatism?" Review of Politics. Vo1.36(1). pp . 85- 131. Simon,Dennis F. 1990, "Techology transfer and national autonomy." in Edwin Winkler & Susan Greenhalgh. ed., Contending Approaches to the Political Economy of Taiwan. New York: M.E. Sharpe,Inc. Singer, Hans. 1950,tlThe distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. "American Economic Review.No.40.pp.73-85. Singer, Hans. & P. Gray 1988, " Trade policy and growth of developing countries: some new data ," World Development, Vol. 16(3),pp.395-403.0 Skocpol, Theda. 1979,State and Social Revolutions: A Comparativer Analysis of France ,Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press. 1985," Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research," in Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. ed., Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge Univ Press. Spainer,John. 1984,Games Nations Play : Analyzing International Politics.New York: Holt ,Reinhart and Winston. Stepan,A1fred 1978,The State and Societ.· Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton:Princeton Univ Press. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 1988, Economics of the Public Sector. New York:W.W. Norton & Company ,2nd edtion. Thirlwall, A.P. 1989, Growth and Development: With Special Referance to Developing Economies. London: Macmillan Education Ltd. 4th,edtion. Todaro, M.P. 1989,Economic Development in the Third World.New York:Longman. Wade, Robert. 1988,"State Interventions in Outward-Looking Development: Neo-Classical Theory and Taiwan`s Practice." in G.White ed. Developmental State in East Asia.London: Macmillian. 1990, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Governmant in East Asian Industrialization. New Jersey: Princeton Univ Press. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979, The Capitalist World-Economy. New York: Cambridge Univ Press. Wang, Vicent Wei-cheng 1994, "High-Tech Paths and Economic Development Comparing NICs Accommodative and Assertive Strategies. “ 政治學報, Vo1.22 ,June , 1994,pp.141-180. World Bank. 1993,The East Asian Miracle:Econmic Growthand Public PolicyNew York:Oxford Univ Press. Wikes,Stephen. & Maurice Wright. 1987, Comparative Government-Indllstrial Relations.Oxford:Clarendo Press. Wincklet,Edwin A. 1984, "Institutionalization and particIpation on Taiwan: from hard to soft authoritarianism?"China Quater/y,No.99. pp.481-499. Wright,Maurice. 1988," Policy Community, Policy Network and Comparative Industrial Policies," Political Studies. Vo1.19,pp.593-612. Wu,Se-Hwa. 1992, "The dynamic cooperation between government and enterprise: the development of Taiwan`s integrate circuit industry." in N.T. ed.Taiwan`s Enterprises in Gobal Perspective. New York: M.E. Sharpe,Inc. Z ysman,J ohn. 1986, Government ,Markets and Growth: Finanxial System and the Politics of Industrial Change. Oxford: Martin Robertson. zh_TW
