1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 主管性別,應徵者性別與晉升潛能對甄選決定的影響
Effects of Manager Sex, Applicant Sex and Promotional Potential on Evaluations for Managerial Position
作者 鄧慧文
Teng, Hui-Wen
貢獻者 陳彰儀
Chen, J-I
鄧慧文
Teng, Hui-Wen
關鍵詞 女王蜂症候群
Queen-Bee Syndrome
日期 1995
上傳時間 28-Apr-2016 15:18:18 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究主要目的在於探討國內企業女性主管人員是否存有「女王蜂症候群（Queen Bee Syndrome）」(任職於原屬男性職業(如管理職位)的女性易顯出排斥同排競爭者的情結)的現象,以及這個現象對甄選決定的影響。研究者採用混合設計之實驗法，即以主管性別（男、女）、應徵者性別（男、女）及應徵者晉升潛能（高、低）等三個獨變項，並以主管對應徵者在有關甄選決定的評量項目為依變項（評量項目有：錄取可能性、資格符合程度、未來的工作績效現、晉升為經理的可能性、共事的愉快程度、以及建議應給予的起始薪資），，請參與受試之主管對所呈現之目標之物作甄選決定評量。最後再將研究結果進行統計分析，以瞭解這個變項對甄選決定的影響，以及驗證女性主管的「女王蜂症候群」現象。
參考文獻 一、中文部份\r\n中華民國統計年鑑?民國八十一年。行政院主計處出版。\r\n台悶地區人口統計?民國八十一年。內政部編印，八十二年十二月出版。\r\n王秀文(民73 ) 台北地區民營企業女性主管工作滿足之研究。東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\r\n李美枝(民73 ) 女性心理學。台北:大洋出版社。\r\n唐文慧( 1988 ) 高職業成就婦女的家庭與事業:以工商企業女性經理人為例。台大社會學研究所碩士論文。\r\n陳玉玲(民79 ) 台灣地區服務業主管對女性工作人員升遷態度之探討。中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\r\n廖榮利( 1988 ) 台灣女性主管之女性觀與領導觀。人事月刊， 1, 9-17.\r\n徐宗國(民79 ) 是為少數者? 工作內涵與工作生活素質，女性與工作研究上的一些回顧與局議。婦女與兩性學刊創刊號。台北:台大人口研究中心婦女研究室。\r\n劉玉的( 1984 ) 台灣地區婦女人力運用情形之分析。台北:行政院經濟建設委員會人力規劃小組編印。\r\n劉屁雯(民78) 台灣省政府女性主管事業生涯發展之研究。東海大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。\r\n羅淑芳(民76) 台灣地區中、外商工商金融界女性主管工作適應現況及人格特質研討。成功大學工商管理研究所碩士論文。\r\n二、英文部份\r\nArvey, R. D. (1979). Unfair discrimination in the employment\r\ninterview : Legal and psychological aspects. Psychological\r\nBulletin, 86, 736-765.\r\nArvey, R. D. & Campion, J. E. (1979). The employment\r\ninterview : A summary and review of recent research.\r\nPersonnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.\r\nAllison, S. T., Messick, D. M. & Goethals, G. R. (1989). On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammed Ali effect. Social Cognition, 1, 275-295.\r\nAllison, S. T., Messick, D. M. & Goethals, G. R. (1989). On\r\nbeing better but not smarter than others: The Muhammed\r\nAli effect. Social Cognition,1, 275-295.\r\nBarr, S. H. & Hitt, M. A. (1986). A comparison of selection\r\ndecision models in manager versus student samples.\r\nPersonnel Psychology, 39, 599-617.\r\nBaskett, G. D. (1973). Interview decision as determined by\r\ncompetency and attitude similarity. Journal of Applied\r\nPsychology, 57, 3343-345.\r\nBass, B. M., Krusell, J., & Alexander, R. A.(l971). Male\r\nmanagersl attitudes toward working women. American\r\nBehavioral Scientist, 12(2), 221-235.\r\nBeggan, J. K., Messick, D. M. & Allison, S. T. (1988). Social values and egocentric bias : Two tests of the might over morality nypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social\r\nPsychology, 55, 606-611.\r\nBern, S. L. (1981` ). Bem Sex-Role Inventory, Professional\r\nManual. Palo Alto , CA : Consulting Psychologists Press.\r\nBernstein, V, Hakel, M. D, Hadan, A.(1975). The college\r\nstudent as interviewer : A threat to generalizability ?\r\nJournal of Applied Psychology, 60, 266-268.\r\nBigoness, W. J. (1976). Effect of applicant`s sex, race, and\r\nperformance on employer`s performance ratings : Some\r\nadditional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, .61, 80-\r\n84.\r\nBilling, Y. D. & Alvesson, M. (1993). Gender, managers, and\r\norganizations. Berlin: Vvalter de Gruyter.\r\nBond, J. R. & Vinacke. `W. E. (1961). Coalitions in mixed sex triads. Sociometry, 24, 61-65.\r\nBowman, G. W., Worthy, N. B. & Greyser, S. A. (1965). Are\r\nwomen executives people? Harvard Business Review, 43,\r\n15-28.\r\nBrown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others : Self -\r\nenhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, .4., 353-376.\r\nByrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York\r\nAcademic Press. Cann, E., Siegfried, W. D. & Pearce, L. (1981). Forced attention to specific applicant qualifications ratings: Some additional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology,.6l, 80-84.\r\nCannings, K. (1988). Managerial Promotion : The Effects of\r\nSocialization, Spec i alization, and` Gender. Industrial and\r\nLabor Relations Review, 42(1), 77-88.\r\nCascio, W. F. & Phillips, N. F. (1979). Performance testing: A rose among thorns? Personnel Psychology, 32, 751-766.\r\nChampman, J. B. (1975). Comparison of male and female\r\nleadership styles. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3),\r\n645-650.\r\nCrosby F. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women.\r\nNew York: Oxford University Press.\r\nDay, D. R. & Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Leader behavior of male\r\nand female supervisors : a comparative study, Personnel\r\nPsychology, 25, 353-360.\r\nDenmark, F. L. & Paludi, M. A. (1993). Psychology of women:\r\ng handbook of issues and theories. Greenwood Publishing\r\nGroup.\r\nDipboye, R. L. (1978). Women as managers - stereotype and\r\nrealities. pp.I-9 In Bette Ann Stead( ed.), Women m\r\nManagement, Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice- Hall.\r\nDipboye, R. L. (1980). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the selection recruitment interview. Unpublished manuscript.\r\nDipboye, R. L. Arvey, R. D. & Terpstra, D. E. (1978). Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as\r\ndeterminants of resume evaluations. Journal of Applied\r\nPsychology, 62, 288-294.\r\nDipboye, R. L., Fromkin, H. L. & Wiback, K. (1975). Relative\r\nimportance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic\r\nstanding in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of\r\nApplied Psychology, 60,39-43.\r\nDipboye, R. L. & Wiley, 1. W. (1977). Reactions of college\r\nrecruiters to interviewee sex and self-presentation style.\r\nJournal of Vocational Behavior, 10(1), 1-12.\r\nDipboye, R. L. & Wiley, 1. W. (1978). Reactions of male raters to interviewee self- presentation style and sex : Extensions of previous research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13(2), 192-203.\r\nDreher, J & Sackett, p. (1983). Perspectives on Employee\r\nStaffing and Seclection. Homewood, Ill. : Richard D. Irwin,\r\nInc.\r\nElliott, A. G. (1981). Sex and decision-making in the selection interview : A real-life study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54(4), 265-273.\r\nFerris, G. R. & Gilmore, D. O. (1977). Effects of mode of\r\npresentation, sex of applicant, and sex of interviewer on\r\nsimulated intervie`vv decisions. Psychological Reports, 40,\r\n566.\r\nFierman, J. (1990). Why women still donlt hit the top. Fortune, July 30,110-117.\r\nFrank, F. D. & Drucker, J. (1977). The influence of evaluateels sex on evaluation of a response of a managerial selection instrument. Sex Roles, }, 59-64.\r\nFrank, L. L. & Hackman, J. R. (1975). Effects of interviewer interviewee similarity on interviewer objectivity in college\r\nadmissions interviews, Journal of Applied Psychology.\r\n60(3 ), 356-360.\r\nFretz, C. F. & Hayman, J. (1973). Progress for women-men are\r\nstill more equal. Harvard Business Review, 2.1, 133-142.\r\nFriend, R. M. & Gilbert, J. (1973). Threat and fear of negative evaluation as determinants of locus of social comparison. Journal of Personality, 41 328-340.\r\nGardner, D. G. & Berger, C. J. (1980 August). The effects of sex stereotypes, amount of relevant information, and awareness of organizational selection practices on sex discrimination for a managerial position. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Detroit.\r\nGilmore, D. C., Beehr, T. A. & Love, K. G. (1986). Effects of applicant`s sex, applicant`s physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decisions. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 103- 109.\r\nGoldberg, P. A. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women?\r\nTransaction, April, 28-30.\r\nGolightly, C., Huffman, D. M. & Byrne, D. (1972). Liking and\r\nloaning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 521-523.\r\nGordon, M. E., Slade, L. A. & Schmitt, H. (1986). The \"Science of the sophomore\" revisited: From convecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review,11, 191-207.\r\nGorman, C. D., Clover, W. H. & Dohe11y, M. E. (1978). Can we\r\nlearn anything about interviewing real people from\r\n\"interviews\" of paper people? Two studies of the external;\r\nvalidity of a paradigm. Organizational Behavior and Human\r\nPerformance, 22,165-192.\r\nGregory, H. D. & Stephanie, J. P. (1986). Sex difference in\r\nleadership: How real are they? Academy of Management\r\nReview, 11(1), 118-127.\r\nGriffeth, R. W. & Bedeian, A. G. (1989). Employee performance evaluations: Effects of ratee age, rater age, and ratee gender. Journal of Organizational Behavior, lQ, 83- 90.\r\nGriffitt, W. & Jackson, T. (1970). Influence of information about ability and non- ability on personnel selection decisions. Psychological Reports, 27, 959-962.\r\nGuion, R. M. (1983). Editorial comments from the new editor.\r\nJournal of Applied Psychology, 68, 547-551.\r\nGuion, R. M. & Gibson, W. M. (1988). Personnel selection and\r\nplacement. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 349-374.\r\nGutek, B. A., & Stevens, D. A. (1979). Effects of sex of subject, sex of stimulus cue, and androgyny level on evaluations in work situations which evoke sex role stereotypes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(1 ), 23-32.\r\nHaefner, J. E. (1977). Race, age, sex, and competence as factors in employer selection of the disadvantaged. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 199-202.\r\nHakel, M. D., Ohnesorge, J. P. & Dunnette, M. D. (1970).\r\nInterviewer evaluations of job applicants` resumes as a\r\nfunction of the qualifications of the immediately preceiding\r\napplicants : An examination of contrast effects. Journal of\r\nApplied Psychology, 54, 27-30.\r\nHakmiller, K. L. (1966). Threat as a determinant of downward\r\ncomparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,\r\n2(Suppl. 1),32-39.\r\nHall, F. S. & Hall, D. T. (1977). Effects of job incumbents` race and sex on evaluations of managerial performance.\r\nAcademy of rvlanagement Journal, 12, 476-48l.\r\nHammer, W. C., Kim, 1. S., Bair, L. & Bigoness, W. J. (1974). Race and sex as determinants of ratings by potential\r\nemployers in a simulated work-sampling task. Journal of\r\nApplied Psychology, 59, 705-711.\r\nHannon, L. W. (1983, March 23). Personal correspondence.\r\nHeilman, M. E. (1984). Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination . : The effects of applicant sex and\r\ninformation type on preliminary employment decisions.\r\nOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360-\r\n372.\r\nHeilman , M. E., Martell, R.F. & Simon, M.C. (1988) The\r\nvagaries of sex bias Conditions regulating the\r\nundervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female\r\njob applicants. Organizational Behavior and Human\r\nDecisions Process, .4.1., 98-110.\r\nHeilman, M. E., Kaplow, S. R., Amato, M. A. G. & Stathatos, P. (1993). When similarity is a liabllity: Effects of sex-based preferential selection on reactions to like-sex and differentsex others. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 917-927.\r\nHeilman, M. E. & Saruwatari, L. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs.\r\nOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360-\r\n372.\r\nHeneman, H. G.,III (1977). Impact of test information and\r\napplicant sex on applicant evaluations in a selection\r\nsimulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 524-526.\r\nHeller,T. (1982). Women and men as leaders : In Business,\r\nEducation, and Social Service Organization. New York\r\nPraeger. \r\nJacobson, M. B., & Effertz, J. (1974). Sex roles and leadership performance of the leaders and the led. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12,383-397.\r\nKalin, R. & Hodgins, D. C. (1984). Sex bias and occupational\r\nsuitability. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, l6.,\r\n311-325.\r\nKanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New\r\nYork: Basic Books.\r\nKauppinen-Toropainen, K. (1987). Ainokaiset Tyoyhteisossa\r\n[Men and Women in Sex-atypical Work]. Helsinki :\r\nTyoterveyslatios.\r\nKeiffer, M.G. & Cullen, D. M. (1974). Women who discriminate\r\nagainst other women : The process of denial. International\r\nJournal of Group Tensions, 4,21-33.\r\nLandy, F. J. & Bates, F. (1973). Another look at contrast effects in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 141-144.\r\nLedbetter, R. R. (1970). Current attitudes held by selected top corporate management regarding the role of as executives. Unou blished doctoral dissertation. United States International University. Ann Arbor, Mich. : University Microfilms, No. 70- 72, 340.\r\nLevinson, R. M. (1975). Sex discrimination and employment\r\npractices : An experiment with unconventional job\r\ninquiries. Social Problems, 22,533-543.\r\nLirtzman, S. & Wahba, M. (l972). Determinants of coalitional\r\nbehavior of men and women : Sex roles or situational requirements? Journal of Applies Psychology, 56.\r\nLondon, M. & Poplowski, 1. R. (1976). Effects of information on stereotype development in performance appraisal and\r\ninterview contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 11, 239-\r\n260.\r\nMaier, N. R. (1970). Male versus female discussion leaders.\r\nPersonnel Psychology, 23, 455-461.\r\nMagargee, E. J. (1969). Influence of sex-roles on the\r\nmanifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology,\r\n53,377-382.\r\nMarks, G. (1984). Thinking one`s abilities are unique and one`s opinions are common. Personality and Social Psychology\r\nBulletin, 10, 203-208.\r\nMathison D. L. (1986). Sex differences in the perceptions of\r\nassertiveness among female managers. Journal of Social\r\nPsychology, 126(5),599-606.\r\nMatlin, M. W. (1987). The Psychology of Women. New York :\r\nCBS College Publishing.\r\nMcGovern, T. V., Jones, B. W. & Morris, S. E. (1979).\r\nComparison of professional versus student ratings of job\r\ninterviewee behavior, Journal of Counseling Psychology~ 26,\r\n176-179.\r\nMcIntyre, S., Moberg, D. J. & Posner, B. Z. (1980). Preferential treatment in preselection decisions according to sex and race. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 738-749.\r\nMessick, D. M., Bloom, S., Boldizar, J. P. & Samuelson, C. D. (1985). Why we are fairer than others. Journal of\r\nExperimental Social Psychology, 2..L 480-500.\r\nMobley, W. H. (1982). Supervisor and employee race and sex\r\neffects on performc1l1ce appraisals: A field study of adverse impact and generalizability. Academy of Management\r\nJournal, 25, 598-606.\r\nMOlTow, P. C., McElroy, J. C., Stamper, B. G. & Wilson, M.\r\nA.( 1990). The effects of physical attractiveness and other\r\ndemographic characteristics on promotion decisions. Journal\r\nof Management, 16(4),723-736.\r\nMuchinsky, P. M. & Harris, S. L. (1977). The effect of applicant sex and scholastic standing on the evaluation of job applicant resumes in sex-typed occupations. Journal of\r\nVocational Behavior, 11 (l ), 95-108.\r\nMullins, T. W. (1982). Interviewer decisions as a function of applicant race, applicant quality and interviewer prejudice. Personnel Psychology, 35, 163-174.\r\nNieva, V. F. & Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, }, 267-276.\r\nOakens, M. M. & Tschirgi, H. (1978). Impact of the face-to-face interview on prior judgments of a candidate. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 322.\r\nOakes, W. (1972). External validity and the use of real people as subjects. American Psychologist, 27, 959-962.\r\nO`Leary, V. E. (1974). Some attitudinal barriers to occupational aspirations in women. Psychology Bulletin, .8l, 809-826.\r\nO`Leary, V.E., Unger, R.K. & Wallston, B. S. (1985). Women,\r\ngender, and social psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum\r\nAssociates, IN.\r\nOlian, J. D., Schwab, D. P. & Haberfeld, Y. (1988). The Impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 41, 180-195.\r\nOliphant, V.N. & Alexander, E. R. III (1982). Reacts to resumes as a function of resume determinateness, applicant\r\ncharacteristics, and sex of raters. Personnel Psychology, 35, 829-843.\r\nOrpen, C. (1984). Attitude similarity,attraction,and decisionmaking in the employment interview. Journal of Psychology, 117,111-120.\r\nPeters, L. H., O`Connor, E. J., Weekley, J., Pooyan, A., Frank, B. & Erenkrantz, B. (1984). Sex bias and managerial\r\nevaluations: A replications and extension. Journal of\r\nApplied Psychology, 69, 349-352.\r\nPheterson, G. J., Kiesler, S. B. & Goldberg, P. A. (1971).\r\nEvaluation of the performance of women as a function of\r\ntheir sex, achievement, and personal history. Journal of\r\nPersonality and Social Psychology, 12, 114-118.\r\nPowell, G. N. (J 986). Effects of expectancy-confirmation\r\nprocesses and applicant`s qualifications on recruiter`s\r\nevaluations. Psychological Reports, 58, 1003-1010.\r\nPowell, G. N. (1987). The effects of sex and gender on\r\nrecruitment. Academy of Management Reviews, 12,731-743.\r\nPulakos, E. D. & Wexley, K. N. (1983). The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in\r\nmanager-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management\r\nJournal, 26,129-139.\r\nRand, T. M. & Wexley, K. M. (1975). Demonstration of the\r\neffect, \"similar to me,\" in simulated employment interviews.\r\nPsychological Repolis) 36(2), 535-544.\r\nRenwick, P.A. & Tosi, H. (1978). The effects of sex, marital\r\nstatus, and educational background on selection decisions.\r\nAcademy of Ivlanagement Journal, 21, 93-103.\r\nRijsman, J. (1983). The dynamics of social competition in\r\npersonal and categorical comparison-situations. In W. Doise\r\n& S. Moscovici Eds), Current Issues in European Social\r\nPsychology, Vol. 1, pp. 279-312. Cambridge : Cambridge\r\nUniversity Press.\r\nRose, G. L. & Andiappan, P. (1978). Sex effects on managerial hiring decisions. Academy of Management Joumal,.2.l, 104-112.\r\nRosen, B. & Jerdee, T. H. (1973). Effests of applicant`s sex and difficulty of job on evaluations of candidates for managerial positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(1 ), 44-48.\r\nRosen, B. & Jerdee, T. H. (1974). Influence of sex role\r\nstereotypes on personnel decisions. Journal of Applied\r\nPsychology, 59, 9-14.\r\nRosen, B. & Mericle, M. F. (1979). Influence of strong versus weak employment policies and applicant`s sex on selection decisions and salary recommendations in a management simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64,435-439.\r\nRuble, D. N., & Ruble, T. L. (1982) . Sex stereotypes. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder : Contemporary\r\nissues instereotyping . New York: Praeger.\r\nSchein, B., Brenner, V. & Tomkiewicz (1989). The relationship between sex and stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32,288.\r\nSchmitt, N. & Robelison, J. (1990). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, .4.l, 289-319.\r\nSchultz, D. P. (1969). The human subject in psychological\r\nresearch. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 214-228.\r\nSchwartz, E. B. (1971). The sex barrier in business. Atlanta, Ga.: Georgia State University.\r\nSchwartz, S. M. & Fattaleh, D. L. (1972). Representation in\r\ndeductive problem solving : the matrix. Journal of\r\nExperimental Psychology, 95, 348-349.\r\nShaw, E. A. (1972). Commonality of applicant stereotypes\r\namong recruiters. Personnel Psychology, 25(3 ), 421-432.\r\nSharp, C. & Post, R. (1980). Evaluation of male and female\r\napplicants for sex- congruent and sex-incongruent jobs. Sex\r\nRoles, .6., 391-401.\r\nSimas, K. & McCarrey, M. (1979). Impact of recruiter\r\nauthoritarianism and applicant sex on evaluation and\r\nselection decisions in a recruitment interview analogue study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 483-491.\r\n·Staines, G., Tavris, C. & Jayaratne, T. E. (1973). The queen bee syndrome. In C. Tavris(Ed.), The Female Experience, pp.63-66. Del Mar, CA: CRM Books.\r\nStaines, G., Tavris, C. & Jayaratne, T. E. (1974). The queen bee syndrome. Psychology Today, 1.7(8),55-60.\r\nStead, B. A. (1978.). Women in Management, Englwood Cliffs,\r\nNJ: Prentice-Hall.\r\nStein, A. H., & Bailey, M. M. (1973). The socialization of\r\nachievement motivation in females. Psychological Bulletin,\r\n80, 345-366.\r\nSterrett, J. H. (1978). The job interview : Body language and perceptions of potential effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 388-390.\r\nStroh, L. K., Brett,J. M. & Reilly, A. H. (1992). All the right stuff: A comparison of female and male managers` career progression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 251-260.\r\nSundvik. L & Lindeman. M. (1993). Sex-role identity and\r\ndiscrimination against same- sex employees. Journal of\r\nOccupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 1-11.\r\nTaylor, M. S. & Ilgen, D. R. (1981). Sex discrimination against women in initial placement decisions : A laboratory\r\ninvestigation. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 859-\r\n865.\r\nTaynor, J. & Deaux, K. (1973). When women are more\r\ndeserving than men: Equity, attribution, and perceived sex\r\ndifference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 360-367.\r\nTesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in\r\nexperimental social psychology ( Vol. 21, pp. 181- 227).\r\nNew York: Academic Press.\r\nTerborg, J. R. (1977). Women in management: A research\r\nreview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 647-664.\r\nTerborg, J. R. & Ilgen, D. R. (1975). A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally male occupations.\r\nOrganization Behavior and Human Performance, U, 352-\r\n376.\r\nTosi, H. L. & Einbender, S. W. (1985). The effects of the type and amount of information in sex discrimination research: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 88, 712-723.\r\nWalsh, J. P., Weinberg, R. M. & Fairfield, M. L. (1987). The\r\neffects of gender on assessment center evaluations. Journal\r\nof Occupational Psychology, 60, 305-309.\r\nWexley, K. N. & Nemeroff, W. F. (1974). The effects of racial prejudice, race of applicant, and biographical similarity on interviewer evaluations of job applicants. Journal of Social and Behavioral Science, 20, 66-78.\r\nWexley, K. N. & Pulakos, E. D. (1982). Sex effects on\r\nperformance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads: A field\r\nstudy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 433- 439.\r\nWills, T. A. (1981). Downdard comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-27l.\r\nWills, T. A. (1987). Downward comparison as a coping\r\nmechanism. In C. R. Snyder & C. Ford (Eds.), Coping with\r\nnegative life events : Clinical and social-psychological\r\nperspectives. New York: Plenum.\r\nWood, J. V., Taylor, S. E. & Lichtman, R. R. (1985). Social\r\ncomparison in adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of\r\nPersonality and Social Psychology, 49,1169-1183.\r\nYuen, E. C. & Lim, H. L. (1990). The interaction of biases in the evaluation of managers in Singapore. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 491-508.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
心理學系
81156010
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002591
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳彰儀zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chen, J-Ien_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 鄧慧文zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Teng, Hui-Wenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 鄧慧文zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Teng, Hui-Wenen_US
dc.date (日期) 1995en_US
dc.date.accessioned 28-Apr-2016 15:18:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 28-Apr-2016 15:18:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 28-Apr-2016 15:18:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002002591en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=99396-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 心理學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 81156010zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究主要目的在於探討國內企業女性主管人員是否存有「女王蜂症候群（Queen Bee Syndrome）」(任職於原屬男性職業(如管理職位)的女性易顯出排斥同排競爭者的情結)的現象,以及這個現象對甄選決定的影響。研究者採用混合設計之實驗法，即以主管性別（男、女）、應徵者性別（男、女）及應徵者晉升潛能（高、低）等三個獨變項，並以主管對應徵者在有關甄選決定的評量項目為依變項（評量項目有：錄取可能性、資格符合程度、未來的工作績效現、晉升為經理的可能性、共事的愉快程度、以及建議應給予的起始薪資），，請參與受試之主管對所呈現之目標之物作甄選決定評量。最後再將研究結果進行統計分析，以瞭解這個變項對甄選決定的影響，以及驗證女性主管的「女王蜂症候群」現象。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章緒論..........1\r\n第一節研究動機與目的..........1\r\n第二節研究問題..........5\r\n第三節名詞詮釋..........6\r\n第二章文獻探討..........\r\n第一節女性與管理..........7\r\n第二節女王蜂症候群（Queen Bee Syndrome）..........8\r\n第三節主管性別與應徵者性別對甄選決定的影響..........14\r\n第四節應徵者晉升潛能對甄選決定的影響..........21\r\n第五節甄選決策模式及甄選方法..........26\r\n第六節研究假設..........33\r\n第三章研究方法\r\n第一節研究對象..........35\r\n第二節研究工具..........35\r\n第三節研究程序..........38\r\n第四節研究設計..........39\r\n第五節統計分析方法..........41\r\n第四章研究結果\r\n第一節受試者基本資料分析..........44\r\n第二節應徵者晉升潛能獨變項之操弄檢驗..........48\r\n第三節主管性別應徵者性別及應徵者晉升潛能對甄選決定之影響分析..........50\r\n第四節受試者自評題目的分析..........67\r\n第五節結論..........72\r\n第五章討論與建議\r\n第一節討論..........75\r\n第二節建議..........87\r\n參考文獻\r\n一、中文部份..........91\r\n二、英文部份..........92\r\n附錄\r\n附錄一..........108\r\n附錄二..........109\r\n附錄三..........111\r\n附錄四..........113zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002591en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 女王蜂症候群zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Queen-Bee Syndromeen_US
dc.title (題名) 主管性別,應徵者性別與晉升潛能對甄選決定的影響zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Effects of Manager Sex, Applicant Sex and Promotional Potential on Evaluations for Managerial Positionen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部份\r\n中華民國統計年鑑?民國八十一年。行政院主計處出版。\r\n台悶地區人口統計?民國八十一年。內政部編印，八十二年十二月出版。\r\n王秀文(民73 ) 台北地區民營企業女性主管工作滿足之研究。東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\r\n李美枝(民73 ) 女性心理學。台北:大洋出版社。\r\n唐文慧( 1988 ) 高職業成就婦女的家庭與事業:以工商企業女性經理人為例。台大社會學研究所碩士論文。\r\n陳玉玲(民79 ) 台灣地區服務業主管對女性工作人員升遷態度之探討。中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\r\n廖榮利( 1988 ) 台灣女性主管之女性觀與領導觀。人事月刊， 1, 9-17.\r\n徐宗國(民79 ) 是為少數者? 工作內涵與工作生活素質，女性與工作研究上的一些回顧與局議。婦女與兩性學刊創刊號。台北:台大人口研究中心婦女研究室。\r\n劉玉的( 1984 ) 台灣地區婦女人力運用情形之分析。台北:行政院經濟建設委員會人力規劃小組編印。\r\n劉屁雯(民78) 台灣省政府女性主管事業生涯發展之研究。東海大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。\r\n羅淑芳(民76) 台灣地區中、外商工商金融界女性主管工作適應現況及人格特質研討。成功大學工商管理研究所碩士論文。\r\n二、英文部份\r\nArvey, R. D. (1979). Unfair discrimination in the employment\r\ninterview : Legal and psychological aspects. Psychological\r\nBulletin, 86, 736-765.\r\nArvey, R. D. & Campion, J. E. (1979). The employment\r\ninterview : A summary and review of recent research.\r\nPersonnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.\r\nAllison, S. T., Messick, D. M. & Goethals, G. R. (1989). On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammed Ali effect. Social Cognition, 1, 275-295.\r\nAllison, S. T., Messick, D. M. & Goethals, G. R. (1989). On\r\nbeing better but not smarter than others: The Muhammed\r\nAli effect. Social Cognition,1, 275-295.\r\nBarr, S. H. & Hitt, M. A. (1986). A comparison of selection\r\ndecision models in manager versus student samples.\r\nPersonnel Psychology, 39, 599-617.\r\nBaskett, G. D. (1973). Interview decision as determined by\r\ncompetency and attitude similarity. Journal of Applied\r\nPsychology, 57, 3343-345.\r\nBass, B. M., Krusell, J., & Alexander, R. A.(l971). Male\r\nmanagersl attitudes toward working women. American\r\nBehavioral Scientist, 12(2), 221-235.\r\nBeggan, J. K., Messick, D. M. & Allison, S. T. (1988). Social values and egocentric bias : Two tests of the might over morality nypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social\r\nPsychology, 55, 606-611.\r\nBern, S. L. (1981` ). Bem Sex-Role Inventory, Professional\r\nManual. Palo Alto , CA : Consulting Psychologists Press.\r\nBernstein, V, Hakel, M. D, Hadan, A.(1975). The college\r\nstudent as interviewer : A threat to generalizability ?\r\nJournal of Applied Psychology, 60, 266-268.\r\nBigoness, W. J. (1976). Effect of applicant`s sex, race, and\r\nperformance on employer`s performance ratings : Some\r\nadditional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, .61, 80-\r\n84.\r\nBilling, Y. D. & Alvesson, M. (1993). Gender, managers, and\r\norganizations. Berlin: Vvalter de Gruyter.\r\nBond, J. R. & Vinacke. `W. E. (1961). Coalitions in mixed sex triads. Sociometry, 24, 61-65.\r\nBowman, G. W., Worthy, N. B. & Greyser, S. A. (1965). Are\r\nwomen executives people? Harvard Business Review, 43,\r\n15-28.\r\nBrown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others : Self -\r\nenhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, .4., 353-376.\r\nByrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York\r\nAcademic Press. Cann, E., Siegfried, W. D. & Pearce, L. (1981). Forced attention to specific applicant qualifications ratings: Some additional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology,.6l, 80-84.\r\nCannings, K. (1988). Managerial Promotion : The Effects of\r\nSocialization, Spec i alization, and` Gender. Industrial and\r\nLabor Relations Review, 42(1), 77-88.\r\nCascio, W. F. & Phillips, N. F. (1979). Performance testing: A rose among thorns? Personnel Psychology, 32, 751-766.\r\nChampman, J. B. (1975). Comparison of male and female\r\nleadership styles. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3),\r\n645-650.\r\nCrosby F. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women.\r\nNew York: Oxford University Press.\r\nDay, D. R. & Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Leader behavior of male\r\nand female supervisors : a comparative study, Personnel\r\nPsychology, 25, 353-360.\r\nDenmark, F. L. & Paludi, M. A. (1993). Psychology of women:\r\ng handbook of issues and theories. Greenwood Publishing\r\nGroup.\r\nDipboye, R. L. (1978). Women as managers - stereotype and\r\nrealities. pp.I-9 In Bette Ann Stead( ed.), Women m\r\nManagement, Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice- Hall.\r\nDipboye, R. L. (1980). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the selection recruitment interview. Unpublished manuscript.\r\nDipboye, R. L. Arvey, R. D. & Terpstra, D. E. (1978). Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as\r\ndeterminants of resume evaluations. Journal of Applied\r\nPsychology, 62, 288-294.\r\nDipboye, R. L., Fromkin, H. L. & Wiback, K. (1975). Relative\r\nimportance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic\r\nstanding in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of\r\nApplied Psychology, 60,39-43.\r\nDipboye, R. L. & Wiley, 1. W. (1977). Reactions of college\r\nrecruiters to interviewee sex and self-presentation style.\r\nJournal of Vocational Behavior, 10(1), 1-12.\r\nDipboye, R. L. & Wiley, 1. W. (1978). Reactions of male raters to interviewee self- presentation style and sex : Extensions of previous research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13(2), 192-203.\r\nDreher, J & Sackett, p. (1983). Perspectives on Employee\r\nStaffing and Seclection. Homewood, Ill. : Richard D. Irwin,\r\nInc.\r\nElliott, A. G. (1981). Sex and decision-making in the selection interview : A real-life study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54(4), 265-273.\r\nFerris, G. R. & Gilmore, D. O. (1977). Effects of mode of\r\npresentation, sex of applicant, and sex of interviewer on\r\nsimulated intervie`vv decisions. Psychological Reports, 40,\r\n566.\r\nFierman, J. (1990). Why women still donlt hit the top. Fortune, July 30,110-117.\r\nFrank, F. D. & Drucker, J. (1977). The influence of evaluateels sex on evaluation of a response of a managerial selection instrument. Sex Roles, }, 59-64.\r\nFrank, L. L. & Hackman, J. R. (1975). Effects of interviewer interviewee similarity on interviewer objectivity in college\r\nadmissions interviews, Journal of Applied Psychology.\r\n60(3 ), 356-360.\r\nFretz, C. F. & Hayman, J. (1973). Progress for women-men are\r\nstill more equal. Harvard Business Review, 2.1, 133-142.\r\nFriend, R. M. & Gilbert, J. (1973). Threat and fear of negative evaluation as determinants of locus of social comparison. Journal of Personality, 41 328-340.\r\nGardner, D. G. & Berger, C. J. (1980 August). The effects of sex stereotypes, amount of relevant information, and awareness of organizational selection practices on sex discrimination for a managerial position. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Detroit.\r\nGilmore, D. C., Beehr, T. A. & Love, K. G. (1986). Effects of applicant`s sex, applicant`s physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decisions. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 103- 109.\r\nGoldberg, P. A. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women?\r\nTransaction, April, 28-30.\r\nGolightly, C., Huffman, D. M. & Byrne, D. (1972). Liking and\r\nloaning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 521-523.\r\nGordon, M. E., Slade, L. A. & Schmitt, H. (1986). The \"Science of the sophomore\" revisited: From convecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review,11, 191-207.\r\nGorman, C. D., Clover, W. H. & Dohe11y, M. E. (1978). Can we\r\nlearn anything about interviewing real people from\r\n\"interviews\" of paper people? Two studies of the external;\r\nvalidity of a paradigm. Organizational Behavior and Human\r\nPerformance, 22,165-192.\r\nGregory, H. D. & Stephanie, J. P. (1986). Sex difference in\r\nleadership: How real are they? Academy of Management\r\nReview, 11(1), 118-127.\r\nGriffeth, R. W. & Bedeian, A. G. (1989). Employee performance evaluations: Effects of ratee age, rater age, and ratee gender. Journal of Organizational Behavior, lQ, 83- 90.\r\nGriffitt, W. & Jackson, T. (1970). Influence of information about ability and non- ability on personnel selection decisions. Psychological Reports, 27, 959-962.\r\nGuion, R. M. (1983). Editorial comments from the new editor.\r\nJournal of Applied Psychology, 68, 547-551.\r\nGuion, R. M. & Gibson, W. M. (1988). Personnel selection and\r\nplacement. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 349-374.\r\nGutek, B. A., & Stevens, D. A. (1979). Effects of sex of subject, sex of stimulus cue, and androgyny level on evaluations in work situations which evoke sex role stereotypes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(1 ), 23-32.\r\nHaefner, J. E. (1977). Race, age, sex, and competence as factors in employer selection of the disadvantaged. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 199-202.\r\nHakel, M. D., Ohnesorge, J. P. & Dunnette, M. D. (1970).\r\nInterviewer evaluations of job applicants` resumes as a\r\nfunction of the qualifications of the immediately preceiding\r\napplicants : An examination of contrast effects. Journal of\r\nApplied Psychology, 54, 27-30.\r\nHakmiller, K. L. (1966). Threat as a determinant of downward\r\ncomparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,\r\n2(Suppl. 1),32-39.\r\nHall, F. S. & Hall, D. T. (1977). Effects of job incumbents` race and sex on evaluations of managerial performance.\r\nAcademy of rvlanagement Journal, 12, 476-48l.\r\nHammer, W. C., Kim, 1. S., Bair, L. & Bigoness, W. J. (1974). Race and sex as determinants of ratings by potential\r\nemployers in a simulated work-sampling task. Journal of\r\nApplied Psychology, 59, 705-711.\r\nHannon, L. W. (1983, March 23). Personal correspondence.\r\nHeilman, M. E. (1984). Information as a deterrent against sex discrimination . : The effects of applicant sex and\r\ninformation type on preliminary employment decisions.\r\nOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360-\r\n372.\r\nHeilman , M. E., Martell, R.F. & Simon, M.C. (1988) The\r\nvagaries of sex bias Conditions regulating the\r\nundervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female\r\njob applicants. Organizational Behavior and Human\r\nDecisions Process, .4.1., 98-110.\r\nHeilman, M. E., Kaplow, S. R., Amato, M. A. G. & Stathatos, P. (1993). When similarity is a liabllity: Effects of sex-based preferential selection on reactions to like-sex and differentsex others. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 917-927.\r\nHeilman, M. E. & Saruwatari, L. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs.\r\nOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 360-\r\n372.\r\nHeneman, H. G.,III (1977). Impact of test information and\r\napplicant sex on applicant evaluations in a selection\r\nsimulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 524-526.\r\nHeller,T. (1982). Women and men as leaders : In Business,\r\nEducation, and Social Service Organization. New York\r\nPraeger. \r\nJacobson, M. B., & Effertz, J. (1974). Sex roles and leadership performance of the leaders and the led. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12,383-397.\r\nKalin, R. & Hodgins, D. C. (1984). Sex bias and occupational\r\nsuitability. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, l6.,\r\n311-325.\r\nKanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New\r\nYork: Basic Books.\r\nKauppinen-Toropainen, K. (1987). Ainokaiset Tyoyhteisossa\r\n[Men and Women in Sex-atypical Work]. Helsinki :\r\nTyoterveyslatios.\r\nKeiffer, M.G. & Cullen, D. M. (1974). Women who discriminate\r\nagainst other women : The process of denial. International\r\nJournal of Group Tensions, 4,21-33.\r\nLandy, F. J. & Bates, F. (1973). Another look at contrast effects in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 141-144.\r\nLedbetter, R. R. (1970). Current attitudes held by selected top corporate management regarding the role of as executives. Unou blished doctoral dissertation. United States International University. Ann Arbor, Mich. : University Microfilms, No. 70- 72, 340.\r\nLevinson, R. M. (1975). Sex discrimination and employment\r\npractices : An experiment with unconventional job\r\ninquiries. Social Problems, 22,533-543.\r\nLirtzman, S. & Wahba, M. (l972). Determinants of coalitional\r\nbehavior of men and women : Sex roles or situational requirements? Journal of Applies Psychology, 56.\r\nLondon, M. & Poplowski, 1. R. (1976). Effects of information on stereotype development in performance appraisal and\r\ninterview contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 11, 239-\r\n260.\r\nMaier, N. R. (1970). Male versus female discussion leaders.\r\nPersonnel Psychology, 23, 455-461.\r\nMagargee, E. J. (1969). Influence of sex-roles on the\r\nmanifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology,\r\n53,377-382.\r\nMarks, G. (1984). Thinking one`s abilities are unique and one`s opinions are common. Personality and Social Psychology\r\nBulletin, 10, 203-208.\r\nMathison D. L. (1986). Sex differences in the perceptions of\r\nassertiveness among female managers. Journal of Social\r\nPsychology, 126(5),599-606.\r\nMatlin, M. W. (1987). The Psychology of Women. New York :\r\nCBS College Publishing.\r\nMcGovern, T. V., Jones, B. W. & Morris, S. E. (1979).\r\nComparison of professional versus student ratings of job\r\ninterviewee behavior, Journal of Counseling Psychology~ 26,\r\n176-179.\r\nMcIntyre, S., Moberg, D. J. & Posner, B. Z. (1980). Preferential treatment in preselection decisions according to sex and race. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 738-749.\r\nMessick, D. M., Bloom, S., Boldizar, J. P. & Samuelson, C. D. (1985). Why we are fairer than others. Journal of\r\nExperimental Social Psychology, 2..L 480-500.\r\nMobley, W. H. (1982). Supervisor and employee race and sex\r\neffects on performc1l1ce appraisals: A field study of adverse impact and generalizability. Academy of Management\r\nJournal, 25, 598-606.\r\nMOlTow, P. C., McElroy, J. C., Stamper, B. G. & Wilson, M.\r\nA.( 1990). The effects of physical attractiveness and other\r\ndemographic characteristics on promotion decisions. Journal\r\nof Management, 16(4),723-736.\r\nMuchinsky, P. M. & Harris, S. L. (1977). The effect of applicant sex and scholastic standing on the evaluation of job applicant resumes in sex-typed occupations. Journal of\r\nVocational Behavior, 11 (l ), 95-108.\r\nMullins, T. W. (1982). Interviewer decisions as a function of applicant race, applicant quality and interviewer prejudice. Personnel Psychology, 35, 163-174.\r\nNieva, V. F. & Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, }, 267-276.\r\nOakens, M. M. & Tschirgi, H. (1978). Impact of the face-to-face interview on prior judgments of a candidate. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 322.\r\nOakes, W. (1972). External validity and the use of real people as subjects. American Psychologist, 27, 959-962.\r\nO`Leary, V. E. (1974). Some attitudinal barriers to occupational aspirations in women. Psychology Bulletin, .8l, 809-826.\r\nO`Leary, V.E., Unger, R.K. & Wallston, B. S. (1985). Women,\r\ngender, and social psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum\r\nAssociates, IN.\r\nOlian, J. D., Schwab, D. P. & Haberfeld, Y. (1988). The Impact of applicant gender compared to qualifications on hiring recommendations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 41, 180-195.\r\nOliphant, V.N. & Alexander, E. R. III (1982). Reacts to resumes as a function of resume determinateness, applicant\r\ncharacteristics, and sex of raters. Personnel Psychology, 35, 829-843.\r\nOrpen, C. (1984). Attitude similarity,attraction,and decisionmaking in the employment interview. Journal of Psychology, 117,111-120.\r\nPeters, L. H., O`Connor, E. J., Weekley, J., Pooyan, A., Frank, B. & Erenkrantz, B. (1984). Sex bias and managerial\r\nevaluations: A replications and extension. Journal of\r\nApplied Psychology, 69, 349-352.\r\nPheterson, G. J., Kiesler, S. B. & Goldberg, P. A. (1971).\r\nEvaluation of the performance of women as a function of\r\ntheir sex, achievement, and personal history. Journal of\r\nPersonality and Social Psychology, 12, 114-118.\r\nPowell, G. N. (J 986). Effects of expectancy-confirmation\r\nprocesses and applicant`s qualifications on recruiter`s\r\nevaluations. Psychological Reports, 58, 1003-1010.\r\nPowell, G. N. (1987). The effects of sex and gender on\r\nrecruitment. Academy of Management Reviews, 12,731-743.\r\nPulakos, E. D. & Wexley, K. N. (1983). The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in\r\nmanager-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management\r\nJournal, 26,129-139.\r\nRand, T. M. & Wexley, K. M. (1975). Demonstration of the\r\neffect, \"similar to me,\" in simulated employment interviews.\r\nPsychological Repolis) 36(2), 535-544.\r\nRenwick, P.A. & Tosi, H. (1978). The effects of sex, marital\r\nstatus, and educational background on selection decisions.\r\nAcademy of Ivlanagement Journal, 21, 93-103.\r\nRijsman, J. (1983). The dynamics of social competition in\r\npersonal and categorical comparison-situations. In W. Doise\r\n& S. Moscovici Eds), Current Issues in European Social\r\nPsychology, Vol. 1, pp. 279-312. Cambridge : Cambridge\r\nUniversity Press.\r\nRose, G. L. & Andiappan, P. (1978). Sex effects on managerial hiring decisions. Academy of Management Joumal,.2.l, 104-112.\r\nRosen, B. & Jerdee, T. H. (1973). Effests of applicant`s sex and difficulty of job on evaluations of candidates for managerial positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(1 ), 44-48.\r\nRosen, B. & Jerdee, T. H. (1974). Influence of sex role\r\nstereotypes on personnel decisions. Journal of Applied\r\nPsychology, 59, 9-14.\r\nRosen, B. & Mericle, M. F. (1979). Influence of strong versus weak employment policies and applicant`s sex on selection decisions and salary recommendations in a management simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64,435-439.\r\nRuble, D. N., & Ruble, T. L. (1982) . Sex stereotypes. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder : Contemporary\r\nissues instereotyping . New York: Praeger.\r\nSchein, B., Brenner, V. & Tomkiewicz (1989). The relationship between sex and stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32,288.\r\nSchmitt, N. & Robelison, J. (1990). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, .4.l, 289-319.\r\nSchultz, D. P. (1969). The human subject in psychological\r\nresearch. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 214-228.\r\nSchwartz, E. B. (1971). The sex barrier in business. Atlanta, Ga.: Georgia State University.\r\nSchwartz, S. M. & Fattaleh, D. L. (1972). Representation in\r\ndeductive problem solving : the matrix. Journal of\r\nExperimental Psychology, 95, 348-349.\r\nShaw, E. A. (1972). Commonality of applicant stereotypes\r\namong recruiters. Personnel Psychology, 25(3 ), 421-432.\r\nSharp, C. & Post, R. (1980). Evaluation of male and female\r\napplicants for sex- congruent and sex-incongruent jobs. Sex\r\nRoles, .6., 391-401.\r\nSimas, K. & McCarrey, M. (1979). Impact of recruiter\r\nauthoritarianism and applicant sex on evaluation and\r\nselection decisions in a recruitment interview analogue study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 483-491.\r\n·Staines, G., Tavris, C. & Jayaratne, T. E. (1973). The queen bee syndrome. In C. Tavris(Ed.), The Female Experience, pp.63-66. Del Mar, CA: CRM Books.\r\nStaines, G., Tavris, C. & Jayaratne, T. E. (1974). The queen bee syndrome. Psychology Today, 1.7(8),55-60.\r\nStead, B. A. (1978.). Women in Management, Englwood Cliffs,\r\nNJ: Prentice-Hall.\r\nStein, A. H., & Bailey, M. M. (1973). The socialization of\r\nachievement motivation in females. Psychological Bulletin,\r\n80, 345-366.\r\nSterrett, J. H. (1978). The job interview : Body language and perceptions of potential effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 388-390.\r\nStroh, L. K., Brett,J. M. & Reilly, A. H. (1992). All the right stuff: A comparison of female and male managers` career progression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 251-260.\r\nSundvik. L & Lindeman. M. (1993). Sex-role identity and\r\ndiscrimination against same- sex employees. Journal of\r\nOccupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 1-11.\r\nTaylor, M. S. & Ilgen, D. R. (1981). Sex discrimination against women in initial placement decisions : A laboratory\r\ninvestigation. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 859-\r\n865.\r\nTaynor, J. & Deaux, K. (1973). When women are more\r\ndeserving than men: Equity, attribution, and perceived sex\r\ndifference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 360-367.\r\nTesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in\r\nexperimental social psychology ( Vol. 21, pp. 181- 227).\r\nNew York: Academic Press.\r\nTerborg, J. R. (1977). Women in management: A research\r\nreview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 647-664.\r\nTerborg, J. R. & Ilgen, D. R. (1975). A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally male occupations.\r\nOrganization Behavior and Human Performance, U, 352-\r\n376.\r\nTosi, H. L. & Einbender, S. W. (1985). The effects of the type and amount of information in sex discrimination research: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 88, 712-723.\r\nWalsh, J. P., Weinberg, R. M. & Fairfield, M. L. (1987). The\r\neffects of gender on assessment center evaluations. Journal\r\nof Occupational Psychology, 60, 305-309.\r\nWexley, K. N. & Nemeroff, W. F. (1974). The effects of racial prejudice, race of applicant, and biographical similarity on interviewer evaluations of job applicants. Journal of Social and Behavioral Science, 20, 66-78.\r\nWexley, K. N. & Pulakos, E. D. (1982). Sex effects on\r\nperformance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads: A field\r\nstudy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 433- 439.\r\nWills, T. A. (1981). Downdard comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-27l.\r\nWills, T. A. (1987). Downward comparison as a coping\r\nmechanism. In C. R. Snyder & C. Ford (Eds.), Coping with\r\nnegative life events : Clinical and social-psychological\r\nperspectives. New York: Plenum.\r\nWood, J. V., Taylor, S. E. & Lichtman, R. R. (1985). Social\r\ncomparison in adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of\r\nPersonality and Social Psychology, 49,1169-1183.\r\nYuen, E. C. & Lim, H. L. (1990). The interaction of biases in the evaluation of managers in Singapore. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 491-508.zh_TW