學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 國中教師科學信念與教學信念,教學行為的關係
Relationship between scientific belief,teaching belief and teaching behavior about junior high school teachers作者 潘雅芳
Pan, Ya-Fang貢獻者 詹志禹
潘雅芳
Pan, Ya-Fang關鍵詞 信念
科學信念
教學信念
國中教師
belief
scientific belief
teaching belief
junior high school日期 1995 上傳時間 28-Apr-2016 15:26:35 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究主要目的為:(一)探討不同背景變項的國中教師,其科學信念是否有差異,(二)探究國中教師科學信念與教學信念的關係,(三)探究國中教師科學信念與教學行為的關係,(四)探究國中教師科學信念與教學信念,教學行為的關係. 參考文獻 中文部分: 王道還等譯(Thomas S. Kuhn 著) (民83) 。科學革命的結構 O 台北:遠流O 王俊明(民7 1 )。國小級任教師之領導行為對班級氣氛的影 響O 國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。 江天驟(民77) 。當代西方科學哲學。台北:谷風。 江新合(民82) 。數學及自然科學師資之培訓研究: (血)國中 理化科教學困難和教師內顯特質之相關研究。行政院國 家科學委員會專題研究計釗成果報告。國立高雄師範大學 科教所。 江新合(民83) 。國中理化教師群體信念及心態特質的調查研 究O 國立高雄師範大學學報, 5 , 159-184 。 汪榮才(民68) 。教師行為、學生制握信念與學業成就。臺南 師專學報, 12 , 1 1 1 - 1 3 1 。 李平寫(民76) 。向科學理性的權威挑戰一科學哲學「頑童」 保羅﹒費若本。當代, 10 , 13-19 李佳錦(民83) 。國中理化教師的教學信念研究。國立高雄 師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。 李章瑋(民84) 。國民小學自然科學潛在課程之研究一以自 然科教師及教學中的科學圖像為例。台北市立師範學院初 教研究所碩士論文。 沈清松(民80) 0 )Mffi~屆質證論的哲學(上)。人文及社會學科教 學通訊, 1(5) , 190-201 0 吳清lLI (民73) 。臺北市國民中學導師專業教育背景與管教態 度對學生生活適應的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩 士論文。 周寄中譯(Lakatos , I. & Musgrav , A 編著) (民82) 。批判 與知識的增長(Criticism and Growth of Knowledge) 。台北:桂冠。 林清財(民79) 。我國國民小學教師教育信念之相關研究。國 立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。 林寶山(民7 1 )。學習環境量表簡介。輔導月刊, 40-41 。 林彩|岫(民76) 。國民中學教師專業自主性之研究。國立臺灣 師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 洪謙(民79) 。邏輯經驗主義論文集。台北:遠流。 洪庸院(民74) 。波柏的科學方法論及其在教育上的意義。國 立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 柯華葳、幸曼玲(民84) 。小學日常教學活動之生態研究。教 改通訊, 12 。 高強華(民8 1 )。教師信念研究及其在學校教育革新上的意 義。國立台灣師範大學教育研究集刊, 34 , 85-1 日。 徐俊祥(民84) 。課程與教學的反思一一個傳記式研究法的例 子。初等教育學報, 5 (2) ,香港:中文大學香港教育研 究所。 莊文瑞(民76) 。當代科學哲學的轉向一巴怕與孔恩的論辯。 當代, 10 , 26-36 。 孫:志麟(民79) 。國民小學教師自我效能及相關因素之研究。 國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。 郭生玉(民74) 。教師的問按與直接影響行為和學童創造力及 學業成績之關係。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學報,此, 57-84 。 郭重吉(民77) 。從認知的觀點探討自然科學的學習。教育學 院學報, 13 , 352-378 。 郭重吉(民8 1 )。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改 進。科學發展月刊, 20(5) , 548-570 0 郭重吉、詐玫理(民8 1 )。從科學哲學觀點的演變探討科學教 育的過去與未來。彰化師範大學學報, 3 , 531-5610 許攻理(民8 1 )。我國國民中學自然科學教師科學哲學觀點之 調查研究。國立彰化師純大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。 張巨育、吳寅華(民83) 。邏輯與歷史一現代科學方法論的擅 變。台北:淑馨。 張芬芬(民73) 。師大結業生分發實習前後教學態度與任教意 願之比較研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 張芬芬(民80) 。師範生教育實習中泊在課程之人種誌研究。 國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 |凍英豪、吳裕盆、李坤崇(民79) 。教師態度量表修訂報告。 測驗年刊, 37 , 25-33 。 陳衛平譯(Larry Laudan 著) (民8 1 )。科學的進步與問題。 台北:桂冠。 舒光(民82) 。科學哲學導論。台北:水牛。 白:煒光(民83) 。科學哲學導論。台北:五悶。 舒煒光、邱仁宗(民79) 。當代西方科學哲學述評。台北:水牛。 黃鴻艾(民70) 。學校經驗對國中教師教室領導行為的影響。 國立臺灣師i向大學教育研究所碩士論文。 詹仕鑫(民78) 。我國國民中學科學教師教學風格之研究。國 立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。 !當志禹(民83) 。理性思考教學模式對科學態度及民主精神之 影響。教育部顧問室委託研究報告,編號83-3-M-001o 倉志禹、吳璧純(民8 1 )。邏輯實證論的迷思。思與言, 30(1)101-121 趙金祁、許榮富、黃芳裕(民8 1 )。科學哲學對科學知識主體 主張的演變。科學教育月刊, 154 , 2 , 18 。 趟金祁、許榮富、與黃芳裕(民82) 。科學哲學對組成科學知 識之主張及其演變。科學教育月刊, 161 , 4-17 。 蔡坤鴻譯(Karl R. Popp 盯著) (民78) 。臆測與駁斥(上) - - 科學知識的成長。台北:幼獅。 鄭呈因(民83) 。國中理化科實習教師教學個案研究。國立高 雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。 鄭昭明(民83) 。認知心理學:理論與實踐。台北:桂冠。 盧美貴(民69) 。國小教師教導方式與學生學習行為之關係。 國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 西文部份 Abimbola, I . O. (1983). The relevance of the "New" philosophy of science for the science curriculum. S c h 001 Sci e n c e and JlIf at h e 17l a tic s, 8 3( 3 ), 1 8 1 - 1 9 3 . Aguirre, J. M., Haggerty, S. M., & Linder, C. J. ( 1990). Student-teachers` conceptions of science, teaching and learning: A case study in preservice science education. International Journal of Science education, 14:4), 381-390. Aikenhead, G. S. (1984). The decision making: The case of prairie high.Journal of Research tn Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 1( 2 ), 1 6 7 - 1 8 6 . Bauch, P . A. (1984). The impact of teachers` tnstructional beliefs on their teaching: Implications for research and practice. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 252 954) Beers, S. E., Bloomingdale, J. R . (1983)Epistemological and instructional assumptions of college teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 232 522) Bigge, M. L. (1982).Educational philosophies for teachers. Ohio: Bell & Howell. Brickhouse, N. W. (1989a). Teachers` beliefs about science and science teaching: Narratives of con- victions`actions and constraints. Dissertation Abstracts International 49/11. Brickhouse, N. W. (1989b). Teachers content knowledge about the nature of science and its relationship to classroom practice. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 306 133) Brickhouse, N. W. (1989c). The teaching of philosophy of science in secondary classrooms: Case studies of teachers` personal theories. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4),437-449. Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers` beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Educat ion 41 ( 3 ) 53-60. Brickhouse, N., & Bonder, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Res ear chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 9( 5 ), 4 7 1 - 4 8 5 . Brousseau, B. A. (1984).Comparing education beliefs of teacher candidates and their nonteaching counterparts. Brousseau, B. A. (1984)., Book, C., & Byers, J. L. ( 1 9 8 8`). Tea c her bel i e f san d the cuI t u res 0 f tea chi n g. lou rna l 0 f Tea c her E d II cat ion, 3 9( 6 ) ,33-39. Brousseau, B. A., & Freeman, D. 1 . (1988). How do teacher education faculty members define desirable teacher beliefs? Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(3),267-273. Burbles, N. C . , & Linn, M. C . (1991). Science education and philosophy of science: Congruence or contradiction? Interactional lournal of Science Education, 13(3),227-241. Calderhead, J. (Ed . ) (1987).Exploring teacher thinking. London : Mackays. Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. I n G era r d R a d nit z k y and W. W . Bar tIe y XII (E d s ) . , Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge, 47-89. Illinois: Open Court. Chang, Tzuchau. (1995). An inveatigation of Taiwanese graduate students` beliefs about scie n t i f i c k now led g e .giji &, 4 0, 5 8 3 - 6 1 8 . Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers` thought process. In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching(3rd ed.)(pp. 253-296). New York: Macmillan. Clasen, R. E., & Bowman, W. E. (1974). Toward a student-centered learning focus inventory for junior high and middle school teachers. The J 0 urn a I 0 fEd u cat ion a IRe sea r c h, 6 8( 1 ), 9 - 1 1 . Corporaal, A. H. (1991). Repertory grid research into cognitions of prospective primary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education,7(4),315-329. Cronin-Jones, L., & Shaw, E. L. (1992). The influence of methods instruction on the beliefs of preservice elementary and secondary SCIence teachers: Preliminary comparative analyses. S c h 0 0 I Sci e n c e a fl d !vI at hem a tic s, 9 2( 1 ), 1 4 - 2 2 . Duffee, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum c han g e, s t u.d e n t e val u a t ion, and tea c her p r act i c a I knowledge. Science Education, 76(5),493-506. Duschl, R. A. (1983). Science teachers` belief about the nature of science and the selection,implementation, and development of instructional tasks: A case study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45/02. Duschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers` decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Res ear chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 6( 6 ), 467 - 5 0 1 . Forge, 1. C. (1979). A role for philosophy of science in the teaching of science. Journal of Philoso-phy of Education, 13, 109-118. Frey, K. M. (1987).Administrative implications of self-reported instructional beliefs and practices of secondary school teachers. (PHD. The Univer-sity of Arizona). DAI 48/03A. Gallagher, 1. 1. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers` knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of SClence. Sci e n c e E d u cat ion , 7 5( 1 ), 1 2 1 - 1 3 3 . Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers` epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Res ear chi Il Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 3 3( 1 ), 4 7 - 6 3 . Hodson, D. (1985).Philosophy of science ,SClence and science education. Studies in Science Education,12, 25-57. Hodson, D. (1986).Philosophy of SCIence and SCIence education. Journal of Philosophy of Education,20(2),215-225. Hodson, D.(1993). Philosophic stance of secondary school science teachers,curriculum experiences, and children`s understanding of science:some preliminary findings. Interchange, 24,41-52. Hook, C. M . & Rosenshine, B. V. (1979). Accuracy of teacher reports of their classroom behavior. Rev i e W 0 fEd u cat ion a l Res ear c h, 4 9( 1 ), 1 - 1 2 . Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on tea c her bel i e f. Ed u cat i 0 11 alP s y c h 0 log i s t, 2 7( 1 ) ,65-90. Koulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1988). Use of systematic networks in the development of a questionnaire. International Journal of Science Education, 10(5),497-509 . Koulaidis, V . , & Ogborn, J. (1989). Philosophy of science: An empirical study of teachers` views. International Journal of Science Education, 11(2),173-184. Koulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1995). Science teachers` philosophical assumptions: How well do we understand them? International Journal of Science Education, 17(3),273-283. La n tz, 0., & K as s, H. (1 9 8 7 ) . C he m i s try tea c her s ` functional paradigms. Science Education, 71(1), 117-134. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems:Toward a theory of scientific growth. US: University of California. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students` and teachers` conceptions of the nature of science: A reVlew of the research. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359. Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers` conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior. Sci-ence Education, 71(5),721-734. Moos, R. H. (1979).Evaluating educational environment. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass. Munby, H. (1984). A qualitative approach to the study of a teacher`s beliefs.Journal of Research in science teaching, 21(1),27-38. Nespor, J. K. (1985).The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching: Fillal report of the teacher beliefs study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 270 446) N e s p 0 r, J. K. (1 9 8 7 ). The r ole 0 f bel i e f sin t·h e practice of teaching.Journal of Curriculum Stu d - i e s, 1 9( 4 ), 3 1 7 - 3 2 8 . N i s bet t, R. E., & R 0 s s, L. (1 9 8 0 ) .H u man i n fer e Jl c e : Strategies andshortcomings of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Nussbaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual chang~ philosophical perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 530-540. Ogunniyi, M. B. (1982). An analysis of prospective science teachers` understanding of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(1),25-32. Ogunniyi, M. B., & Pella, M. O. (1980). Conceptualizations of scientific concepts,laws,and theories held by Kwara State,Nigeria secondary school science teachers. Science Education, 64 (5),591-599. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers` beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Rev i e W of Ed u cat ion a l Res ear c h, 6 2( 3 ), 3 07-332. Perkinson, H. J. (1993).Teachers without goals, students without purposes. New York: McGraw Hill. Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers` beliefs about the nature of science:Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers,and elementary teachers.Science Education, 77(3),261-178. Pope, M., & Denicolo, P. (1993). The art and SCIence of constructive research in teacher think- 1 n g. Tea chi n g and Tea c her E d II cat ion, 9( 5 ) ,529-544. Popper, K. R. (1953,1974). The problem of induction. In David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections (pp.101-117). New Jersey: Princeton University. Popper, K. R. (1960). The growth of scientific k now 1 e d g e. I n D a v i d Mill e I` (E d . ) ,P 0 p per selections(pp.171-180). New Jersey: Princeton University. Popper, K. R. (1967). Knowledge: Subjective versus objective. In David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections( pp . 101-117). New Jersey: Princeton University.(pp.58-77). Popper, K. R. (1973). Evolutionary epistemology. In David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections(pp.78- 86). New Jersey: Princeton University. Popper, K. R. (1974). Campbell on the evolutionary theory of knowledge. In Gerard Radnitzky and W. W. Bar tIe y ,III (E d s ) . , E vol uti 0 n a r y epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge, 115-120. Illinois: Open Court. R a d nit z k y, G., & Bar t ley JII W. W. (1 9 8 7 ) . E vol u - tionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge. Illinois: Open Court. Richards, J. (1992).Beginning Professionals` meta-phors in an early field placement. (ERIC Docu-ment Reproduction Service No. ED 3483 5 3 ) Robinson, J. (1969). Philosophy of SCIence: Implication for teacher education. Journal of Res ear chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g) 6( 1 ), 9 9 - 1 04 . Rowell, J. A., & Cawthron, E. R. (1982). Images of SCIences: An empirical study. European Journal of Science Education) 4:1), 79-94. Rubba, P. A. & Anderson, H. O. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students` understanding of the nature of sci e n t i f i c k now 1 e d g e . Sci e n c e Ed u cat ion) 6 2( 4 ) ,449-458. Shavelson, R. J. & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers` pedagogical thoughts,judgements,decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Res ear c h) 5 1, 4 5 5 - 4 9 8 . Sigel, Irving E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of beliefs. In Irving E. Sigel(Eds.),Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children(pp. 433-456). Hilladale, NJ : Erlbaum. Sigel, Irving E. (1992). The belief-behavior connection : A resolvable dilemma? In Irving E, Sigel(Eds.), Parental belief systems:the psychological consequences for clzildren(pp. 433-456). Hilladale, NJ: Erlbaum. Smith, D. C., & Neal, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary SCIence teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education,5(1), 1-20 . Sutton, C. (1996) . Beliefs about SCIence and beliefs about language. Interllational Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 1-18. Taylor, P. C. (1990).The influence of teacher beliefs on constructivist teaching practices. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 320 883) Tabachnick, B. R. et al. (1982).The impact of the student teaching experience on the development oft e a c her per s p e c t i v e s. ( E RIC D O`c u men t Rep r 0 - duction Service No. ED 218 251) Tabachnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1985)Ihe development of teacher perspectives: Final report. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No . ED 266099) Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers` beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathe- matics Teaching and Learning, 127-146. New York: Macmillan. Tobin, K., & Gallagher, I. (1987). What happens In high school science classrooms? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(6),549-560. Tornvall, A. (1987). An investigation into the relationship between teacher beliefs and the philosophy of Laroplan 69. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(2),175-182. Tuan, H. L. (1991).The influence of preserVlce secondary science teachers` beliefs about science and pedagogy on their planning and teaching . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332 871) Wehling, L. I., & Charters, W. W. (1969). DimenSlons of teacher beliefs about the teaching process. American Educational Research Journal, fK1),7-30. Wellington, T., & Lakin, S. (1994). Who will teach the `nature of science?:Teachers` views of science and their implications for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 1fi.,2) , 175-190. Winitzky, N., Kauchak, D., & Kelly, M. (1994). Measuring teachers` structural knowledge. Tea chi Il g and Tea c her E d II cat ion, 1 O( 2 ), 1 2 5 -139 . Zeichner, K. M., & Tabachnick, B. R. (1983). Teacher perspectives ill the face of institutional press.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 240113) 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
83152011資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002776 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 詹志禹 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 潘雅芳 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Pan, Ya-Fang en_US dc.creator (作者) 潘雅芳 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Pan, Ya-Fang en_US dc.date (日期) 1995 en_US dc.date.accessioned 28-Apr-2016 15:26:35 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 28-Apr-2016 15:26:35 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 28-Apr-2016 15:26:35 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002002776 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/87676 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 教育學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 83152011 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究主要目的為:(一)探討不同背景變項的國中教師,其科學信念是否有差異,(二)探究國中教師科學信念與教學信念的關係,(三)探究國中教師科學信念與教學行為的關係,(四)探究國中教師科學信念與教學信念,教學行為的關係. zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章緒論..........1 第一節研究動機與目的..........1 第二節待答問題..........5 第三節重要名詞釋義..........6 第二章文獻探討..........9 第一節信念的概念分析..........9 第二節不同背景變項的教師與科學信念之關係..........22 第三節教師信念與教學行為的關係..........25 第四節從科學哲學的發展探討教師的科學信念..........29 第五節從實證研究探討教師的科學信念..........50 第六節教師科學信念與教學信念、教學行為之關係..........79 第三章研究問題與研究假設..........104 第一節研究問題..........104 第二節研究假設..........106 第四章研究方法..........107 第一節研究架構..........107 第二節實施程序..........108 第三節研究對象..........108 第四節研究工具..........111 第五節資料處理..........128 第五章研究結果..........130 第一節國中教師科學信念現況分析..........130 第二節國中教師科學信念與教學信念的關係..........137 第三節國中教師科學信念與教學行為的關係..........141 第四節國中教師科學信念與教學信念、教學行為整體模式之探索..........146 第六章討論與建議..........151 第一節討論..........151 第二節研究限制..........164 第三節建議..........166 參考書目..........171 附錄一..........188 附錄二..........189 附錄三..........192 附錄四..........197 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002776 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 信念 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 科學信念 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教學信念 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國中教師 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) belief en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) scientific belief en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) teaching belief en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) junior high school en_US dc.title (題名) 國中教師科學信念與教學信念,教學行為的關係 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Relationship between scientific belief,teaching belief and teaching behavior about junior high school teachers en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分: 王道還等譯(Thomas S. Kuhn 著) (民83) 。科學革命的結構 O 台北:遠流O 王俊明(民7 1 )。國小級任教師之領導行為對班級氣氛的影 響O 國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。 江天驟(民77) 。當代西方科學哲學。台北:谷風。 江新合(民82) 。數學及自然科學師資之培訓研究: (血)國中 理化科教學困難和教師內顯特質之相關研究。行政院國 家科學委員會專題研究計釗成果報告。國立高雄師範大學 科教所。 江新合(民83) 。國中理化教師群體信念及心態特質的調查研 究O 國立高雄師範大學學報, 5 , 159-184 。 汪榮才(民68) 。教師行為、學生制握信念與學業成就。臺南 師專學報, 12 , 1 1 1 - 1 3 1 。 李平寫(民76) 。向科學理性的權威挑戰一科學哲學「頑童」 保羅﹒費若本。當代, 10 , 13-19 李佳錦(民83) 。國中理化教師的教學信念研究。國立高雄 師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。 李章瑋(民84) 。國民小學自然科學潛在課程之研究一以自 然科教師及教學中的科學圖像為例。台北市立師範學院初 教研究所碩士論文。 沈清松(民80) 0 )Mffi~屆質證論的哲學(上)。人文及社會學科教 學通訊, 1(5) , 190-201 0 吳清lLI (民73) 。臺北市國民中學導師專業教育背景與管教態 度對學生生活適應的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩 士論文。 周寄中譯(Lakatos , I. & Musgrav , A 編著) (民82) 。批判 與知識的增長(Criticism and Growth of Knowledge) 。台北:桂冠。 林清財(民79) 。我國國民小學教師教育信念之相關研究。國 立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。 林寶山(民7 1 )。學習環境量表簡介。輔導月刊, 40-41 。 林彩|岫(民76) 。國民中學教師專業自主性之研究。國立臺灣 師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 洪謙(民79) 。邏輯經驗主義論文集。台北:遠流。 洪庸院(民74) 。波柏的科學方法論及其在教育上的意義。國 立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 柯華葳、幸曼玲(民84) 。小學日常教學活動之生態研究。教 改通訊, 12 。 高強華(民8 1 )。教師信念研究及其在學校教育革新上的意 義。國立台灣師範大學教育研究集刊, 34 , 85-1 日。 徐俊祥(民84) 。課程與教學的反思一一個傳記式研究法的例 子。初等教育學報, 5 (2) ,香港:中文大學香港教育研 究所。 莊文瑞(民76) 。當代科學哲學的轉向一巴怕與孔恩的論辯。 當代, 10 , 26-36 。 孫:志麟(民79) 。國民小學教師自我效能及相關因素之研究。 國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。 郭生玉(民74) 。教師的問按與直接影響行為和學童創造力及 學業成績之關係。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學報,此, 57-84 。 郭重吉(民77) 。從認知的觀點探討自然科學的學習。教育學 院學報, 13 , 352-378 。 郭重吉(民8 1 )。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改 進。科學發展月刊, 20(5) , 548-570 0 郭重吉、詐玫理(民8 1 )。從科學哲學觀點的演變探討科學教 育的過去與未來。彰化師範大學學報, 3 , 531-5610 許攻理(民8 1 )。我國國民中學自然科學教師科學哲學觀點之 調查研究。國立彰化師純大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。 張巨育、吳寅華(民83) 。邏輯與歷史一現代科學方法論的擅 變。台北:淑馨。 張芬芬(民73) 。師大結業生分發實習前後教學態度與任教意 願之比較研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 張芬芬(民80) 。師範生教育實習中泊在課程之人種誌研究。 國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 |凍英豪、吳裕盆、李坤崇(民79) 。教師態度量表修訂報告。 測驗年刊, 37 , 25-33 。 陳衛平譯(Larry Laudan 著) (民8 1 )。科學的進步與問題。 台北:桂冠。 舒光(民82) 。科學哲學導論。台北:水牛。 白:煒光(民83) 。科學哲學導論。台北:五悶。 舒煒光、邱仁宗(民79) 。當代西方科學哲學述評。台北:水牛。 黃鴻艾(民70) 。學校經驗對國中教師教室領導行為的影響。 國立臺灣師i向大學教育研究所碩士論文。 詹仕鑫(民78) 。我國國民中學科學教師教學風格之研究。國 立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。 !當志禹(民83) 。理性思考教學模式對科學態度及民主精神之 影響。教育部顧問室委託研究報告,編號83-3-M-001o 倉志禹、吳璧純(民8 1 )。邏輯實證論的迷思。思與言, 30(1)101-121 趙金祁、許榮富、黃芳裕(民8 1 )。科學哲學對科學知識主體 主張的演變。科學教育月刊, 154 , 2 , 18 。 趟金祁、許榮富、與黃芳裕(民82) 。科學哲學對組成科學知 識之主張及其演變。科學教育月刊, 161 , 4-17 。 蔡坤鴻譯(Karl R. Popp 盯著) (民78) 。臆測與駁斥(上) - - 科學知識的成長。台北:幼獅。 鄭呈因(民83) 。國中理化科實習教師教學個案研究。國立高 雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。 鄭昭明(民83) 。認知心理學:理論與實踐。台北:桂冠。 盧美貴(民69) 。國小教師教導方式與學生學習行為之關係。 國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。 西文部份 Abimbola, I . O. (1983). The relevance of the "New" philosophy of science for the science curriculum. S c h 001 Sci e n c e and JlIf at h e 17l a tic s, 8 3( 3 ), 1 8 1 - 1 9 3 . Aguirre, J. M., Haggerty, S. M., & Linder, C. J. ( 1990). Student-teachers` conceptions of science, teaching and learning: A case study in preservice science education. International Journal of Science education, 14:4), 381-390. Aikenhead, G. S. (1984). The decision making: The case of prairie high.Journal of Research tn Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 1( 2 ), 1 6 7 - 1 8 6 . Bauch, P . A. (1984). The impact of teachers` tnstructional beliefs on their teaching: Implications for research and practice. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 252 954) Beers, S. E., Bloomingdale, J. R . (1983)Epistemological and instructional assumptions of college teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 232 522) Bigge, M. L. (1982).Educational philosophies for teachers. Ohio: Bell & Howell. Brickhouse, N. W. (1989a). Teachers` beliefs about science and science teaching: Narratives of con- victions`actions and constraints. Dissertation Abstracts International 49/11. Brickhouse, N. W. (1989b). Teachers content knowledge about the nature of science and its relationship to classroom practice. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 306 133) Brickhouse, N. W. (1989c). The teaching of philosophy of science in secondary classrooms: Case studies of teachers` personal theories. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4),437-449. Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers` beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Educat ion 41 ( 3 ) 53-60. Brickhouse, N., & Bonder, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Res ear chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 9( 5 ), 4 7 1 - 4 8 5 . Brousseau, B. A. (1984).Comparing education beliefs of teacher candidates and their nonteaching counterparts. Brousseau, B. A. (1984)., Book, C., & Byers, J. L. ( 1 9 8 8`). Tea c her bel i e f san d the cuI t u res 0 f tea chi n g. lou rna l 0 f Tea c her E d II cat ion, 3 9( 6 ) ,33-39. Brousseau, B. A., & Freeman, D. 1 . (1988). How do teacher education faculty members define desirable teacher beliefs? Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(3),267-273. Burbles, N. C . , & Linn, M. C . (1991). Science education and philosophy of science: Congruence or contradiction? Interactional lournal of Science Education, 13(3),227-241. Calderhead, J. (Ed . ) (1987).Exploring teacher thinking. London : Mackays. Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. I n G era r d R a d nit z k y and W. W . Bar tIe y XII (E d s ) . , Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge, 47-89. Illinois: Open Court. Chang, Tzuchau. (1995). An inveatigation of Taiwanese graduate students` beliefs about scie n t i f i c k now led g e .giji &, 4 0, 5 8 3 - 6 1 8 . Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers` thought process. In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching(3rd ed.)(pp. 253-296). New York: Macmillan. Clasen, R. E., & Bowman, W. E. (1974). Toward a student-centered learning focus inventory for junior high and middle school teachers. The J 0 urn a I 0 fEd u cat ion a IRe sea r c h, 6 8( 1 ), 9 - 1 1 . Corporaal, A. H. (1991). Repertory grid research into cognitions of prospective primary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education,7(4),315-329. Cronin-Jones, L., & Shaw, E. L. (1992). The influence of methods instruction on the beliefs of preservice elementary and secondary SCIence teachers: Preliminary comparative analyses. S c h 0 0 I Sci e n c e a fl d !vI at hem a tic s, 9 2( 1 ), 1 4 - 2 2 . Duffee, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum c han g e, s t u.d e n t e val u a t ion, and tea c her p r act i c a I knowledge. Science Education, 76(5),493-506. Duschl, R. A. (1983). Science teachers` belief about the nature of science and the selection,implementation, and development of instructional tasks: A case study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45/02. Duschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers` decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Res ear chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 6( 6 ), 467 - 5 0 1 . Forge, 1. C. (1979). A role for philosophy of science in the teaching of science. Journal of Philoso-phy of Education, 13, 109-118. Frey, K. M. (1987).Administrative implications of self-reported instructional beliefs and practices of secondary school teachers. (PHD. The Univer-sity of Arizona). DAI 48/03A. Gallagher, 1. 1. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers` knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of SClence. Sci e n c e E d u cat ion , 7 5( 1 ), 1 2 1 - 1 3 3 . Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers` epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Res ear chi Il Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 3 3( 1 ), 4 7 - 6 3 . Hodson, D. (1985).Philosophy of science ,SClence and science education. Studies in Science Education,12, 25-57. Hodson, D. (1986).Philosophy of SCIence and SCIence education. Journal of Philosophy of Education,20(2),215-225. Hodson, D.(1993). Philosophic stance of secondary school science teachers,curriculum experiences, and children`s understanding of science:some preliminary findings. Interchange, 24,41-52. Hook, C. M . & Rosenshine, B. V. (1979). Accuracy of teacher reports of their classroom behavior. Rev i e W 0 fEd u cat ion a l Res ear c h, 4 9( 1 ), 1 - 1 2 . Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on tea c her bel i e f. Ed u cat i 0 11 alP s y c h 0 log i s t, 2 7( 1 ) ,65-90. Koulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1988). Use of systematic networks in the development of a questionnaire. International Journal of Science Education, 10(5),497-509 . Koulaidis, V . , & Ogborn, J. (1989). Philosophy of science: An empirical study of teachers` views. International Journal of Science Education, 11(2),173-184. Koulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1995). Science teachers` philosophical assumptions: How well do we understand them? International Journal of Science Education, 17(3),273-283. La n tz, 0., & K as s, H. (1 9 8 7 ) . C he m i s try tea c her s ` functional paradigms. Science Education, 71(1), 117-134. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems:Toward a theory of scientific growth. US: University of California. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students` and teachers` conceptions of the nature of science: A reVlew of the research. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359. Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers` conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior. Sci-ence Education, 71(5),721-734. Moos, R. H. (1979).Evaluating educational environment. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass. Munby, H. (1984). A qualitative approach to the study of a teacher`s beliefs.Journal of Research in science teaching, 21(1),27-38. Nespor, J. K. (1985).The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching: Fillal report of the teacher beliefs study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 270 446) N e s p 0 r, J. K. (1 9 8 7 ). The r ole 0 f bel i e f sin t·h e practice of teaching.Journal of Curriculum Stu d - i e s, 1 9( 4 ), 3 1 7 - 3 2 8 . N i s bet t, R. E., & R 0 s s, L. (1 9 8 0 ) .H u man i n fer e Jl c e : Strategies andshortcomings of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Nussbaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual chang~ philosophical perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 530-540. Ogunniyi, M. B. (1982). An analysis of prospective science teachers` understanding of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(1),25-32. Ogunniyi, M. B., & Pella, M. O. (1980). Conceptualizations of scientific concepts,laws,and theories held by Kwara State,Nigeria secondary school science teachers. Science Education, 64 (5),591-599. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers` beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Rev i e W of Ed u cat ion a l Res ear c h, 6 2( 3 ), 3 07-332. Perkinson, H. J. (1993).Teachers without goals, students without purposes. New York: McGraw Hill. Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers` beliefs about the nature of science:Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers,and elementary teachers.Science Education, 77(3),261-178. Pope, M., & Denicolo, P. (1993). The art and SCIence of constructive research in teacher think- 1 n g. Tea chi n g and Tea c her E d II cat ion, 9( 5 ) ,529-544. Popper, K. R. (1953,1974). The problem of induction. In David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections (pp.101-117). New Jersey: Princeton University. Popper, K. R. (1960). The growth of scientific k now 1 e d g e. I n D a v i d Mill e I` (E d . ) ,P 0 p per selections(pp.171-180). New Jersey: Princeton University. Popper, K. R. (1967). Knowledge: Subjective versus objective. In David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections( pp . 101-117). New Jersey: Princeton University.(pp.58-77). Popper, K. R. (1973). Evolutionary epistemology. In David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections(pp.78- 86). New Jersey: Princeton University. Popper, K. R. (1974). Campbell on the evolutionary theory of knowledge. In Gerard Radnitzky and W. W. Bar tIe y ,III (E d s ) . , E vol uti 0 n a r y epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge, 115-120. Illinois: Open Court. R a d nit z k y, G., & Bar t ley JII W. W. (1 9 8 7 ) . E vol u - tionary epistemology, rationality, and the sociology of knowledge. Illinois: Open Court. Richards, J. (1992).Beginning Professionals` meta-phors in an early field placement. (ERIC Docu-ment Reproduction Service No. ED 3483 5 3 ) Robinson, J. (1969). Philosophy of SCIence: Implication for teacher education. Journal of Res ear chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g) 6( 1 ), 9 9 - 1 04 . Rowell, J. A., & Cawthron, E. R. (1982). Images of SCIences: An empirical study. European Journal of Science Education) 4:1), 79-94. Rubba, P. A. & Anderson, H. O. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students` understanding of the nature of sci e n t i f i c k now 1 e d g e . Sci e n c e Ed u cat ion) 6 2( 4 ) ,449-458. Shavelson, R. J. & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers` pedagogical thoughts,judgements,decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Res ear c h) 5 1, 4 5 5 - 4 9 8 . Sigel, Irving E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of beliefs. In Irving E. Sigel(Eds.),Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children(pp. 433-456). Hilladale, NJ : Erlbaum. Sigel, Irving E. (1992). The belief-behavior connection : A resolvable dilemma? In Irving E, Sigel(Eds.), Parental belief systems:the psychological consequences for clzildren(pp. 433-456). Hilladale, NJ: Erlbaum. Smith, D. C., & Neal, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary SCIence teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education,5(1), 1-20 . Sutton, C. (1996) . Beliefs about SCIence and beliefs about language. Interllational Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 1-18. Taylor, P. C. (1990).The influence of teacher beliefs on constructivist teaching practices. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 320 883) Tabachnick, B. R. et al. (1982).The impact of the student teaching experience on the development oft e a c her per s p e c t i v e s. ( E RIC D O`c u men t Rep r 0 - duction Service No. ED 218 251) Tabachnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1985)Ihe development of teacher perspectives: Final report. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No . ED 266099) Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers` beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathe- matics Teaching and Learning, 127-146. New York: Macmillan. Tobin, K., & Gallagher, I. (1987). What happens In high school science classrooms? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(6),549-560. Tornvall, A. (1987). An investigation into the relationship between teacher beliefs and the philosophy of Laroplan 69. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(2),175-182. Tuan, H. L. (1991).The influence of preserVlce secondary science teachers` beliefs about science and pedagogy on their planning and teaching . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332 871) Wehling, L. I., & Charters, W. W. (1969). DimenSlons of teacher beliefs about the teaching process. American Educational Research Journal, fK1),7-30. Wellington, T., & Lakin, S. (1994). Who will teach the `nature of science?:Teachers` views of science and their implications for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 1fi.,2) , 175-190. Winitzky, N., Kauchak, D., & Kelly, M. (1994). Measuring teachers` structural knowledge. Tea chi Il g and Tea c her E d II cat ion, 1 O( 2 ), 1 2 5 -139 . Zeichner, K. M., & Tabachnick, B. R. (1983). Teacher perspectives ill the face of institutional press.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 240113) zh_TW