1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 國中教師科學信念與教學信念,教學行為的關係
Relationship between scientific belief,teaching belief and teaching behavior about junior high school teachers
作者 潘雅芳
Pan, Ya-Fang
貢獻者 詹志禹
潘雅芳
Pan, Ya-Fang
關鍵詞 信念
科學信念
教學信念
國中教師
belief
scientific belief
teaching belief
junior high school
日期 1995
上傳時間 28-Apr-2016 15:26:35 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究主要目的為:(一)探討不同背景變項的國中教師,其科學信念是否有差異,(二)探究國中教師科學信念與教學信念的關係,(三)探究國中教師科學信念與教學行為的關係,(四)探究國中教師科學信念與教學信念,教學行為的關係.
參考文獻 中文部分:\r\n王道還等譯(Thomas S. Kuhn 著) (民83) 。科學革命的結構\r\nO 台北:遠流O\r\n王俊明(民7 1 )。國小級任教師之領導行為對班級氣氛的影\r\n響O 國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。\r\n江天驟(民77) 。當代西方科學哲學。台北:谷風。\r\n江新合(民82) 。數學及自然科學師資之培訓研究: (血)國中\r\n理化科教學困難和教師內顯特質之相關研究。行政院國\r\n家科學委員會專題研究計釗成果報告。國立高雄師範大學\r\n科教所。\r\n江新合(民83) 。國中理化教師群體信念及心態特質的調查研\r\n究O 國立高雄師範大學學報， 5 ， 159-184 。\r\n汪榮才(民68) 。教師行為、學生制握信念與學業成就。臺南\r\n師專學報， 12 , 1 1 1 - 1 3 1 。\r\n李平寫(民76) 。向科學理性的權威挑戰一科學哲學「頑童」\r\n保羅﹒費若本。當代， 10 ， 13-19\r\n李佳錦(民83) 。國中理化教師的教學信念研究。國立高雄\r\n師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n李章瑋(民84) 。國民小學自然科學潛在課程之研究一以自\r\n然科教師及教學中的科學圖像為例。台北市立師範學院初\r\n教研究所碩士論文。\r\n沈清松(民80) 0 )Mffi~屆質證論的哲學(上)。人文及社會學科教\r\n學通訊， 1(5) ， 190-201 0\r\n吳清lLI (民73) 。臺北市國民中學導師專業教育背景與管教態\r\n度對學生生活適應的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩\r\n士論文。\r\n周寄中譯(Lakatos ， I. & Musgrav ， A 編著) (民82) 。批判\r\n與知識的增長(Criticism and Growth of Knowledge)\r\n。台北:桂冠。\r\n林清財(民79) 。我國國民小學教師教育信念之相關研究。國\r\n立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。\r\n林寶山(民7 1 )。學習環境量表簡介。輔導月刊， 40-41 。\r\n林彩|岫(民76) 。國民中學教師專業自主性之研究。國立臺灣\r\n師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n洪謙(民79) 。邏輯經驗主義論文集。台北:遠流。\r\n洪庸院(民74) 。波柏的科學方法論及其在教育上的意義。國\r\n立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n柯華葳、幸曼玲(民84) 。小學日常教學活動之生態研究。教\r\n改通訊， 12 。\r\n高強華(民8 1 )。教師信念研究及其在學校教育革新上的意\r\n義。國立台灣師範大學教育研究集刊， 34 ， 85-1 日。\r\n徐俊祥(民84) 。課程與教學的反思一一個傳記式研究法的例\r\n子。初等教育學報， 5 (2) ，香港:中文大學香港教育研\r\n究所。\r\n莊文瑞(民76) 。當代科學哲學的轉向一巴怕與孔恩的論辯。\r\n當代， 10 ， 26-36 。\r\n孫:志麟(民79) 。國民小學教師自我效能及相關因素之研究。\r\n國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n郭生玉(民74) 。教師的問按與直接影響行為和學童創造力及\r\n學業成績之關係。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學報，此，\r\n57-84 。\r\n郭重吉(民77) 。從認知的觀點探討自然科學的學習。教育學\r\n院學報， 13 ， 352-378 。\r\n郭重吉(民8 1 )。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改\r\n進。科學發展月刊， 20(5) ， 548-570 0\r\n郭重吉、詐玫理(民8 1 )。從科學哲學觀點的演變探討科學教\r\n育的過去與未來。彰化師範大學學報， 3 ， 531-5610\r\n許攻理(民8 1 )。我國國民中學自然科學教師科學哲學觀點之\r\n調查研究。國立彰化師純大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n張巨育、吳寅華(民83) 。邏輯與歷史一現代科學方法論的擅\r\n變。台北:淑馨。\r\n張芬芬(民73) 。師大結業生分發實習前後教學態度與任教意\r\n願之比較研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n張芬芬(民80) 。師範生教育實習中泊在課程之人種誌研究。\r\n國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n|凍英豪、吳裕盆、李坤崇(民79) 。教師態度量表修訂報告。\r\n測驗年刊， 37 , 25-33 。\r\n陳衛平譯(Larry Laudan 著) (民8 1 )。科學的進步與問題。\r\n台北:桂冠。\r\n舒光(民82) 。科學哲學導論。台北:水牛。\r\n白:煒光(民83) 。科學哲學導論。台北:五悶。\r\n舒煒光、邱仁宗(民79) 。當代西方科學哲學述評。台北:水牛。\r\n黃鴻艾(民70) 。學校經驗對國中教師教室領導行為的影響。\r\n國立臺灣師i向大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n詹仕鑫(民78) 。我國國民中學科學教師教學風格之研究。國\r\n立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n!當志禹(民83) 。理性思考教學模式對科學態度及民主精神之\r\n影響。教育部顧問室委託研究報告，編號83-3-M-001o\r\n倉志禹、吳璧純(民8 1 )。邏輯實證論的迷思。思與言， 30(1)101-121\r\n趙金祁、許榮富、黃芳裕(民8 1 )。科學哲學對科學知識主體\r\n主張的演變。科學教育月刊， 154 ， 2 ， 18 。\r\n趟金祁、許榮富、與黃芳裕(民82) 。科學哲學對組成科學知\r\n識之主張及其演變。科學教育月刊， 161 ， 4-17 。\r\n蔡坤鴻譯(Karl R. Popp 盯著) (民78) 。臆測與駁斥(上) - -\r\n科學知識的成長。台北:幼獅。\r\n鄭呈因(民83) 。國中理化科實習教師教學個案研究。國立高\r\n雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n鄭昭明(民83) 。認知心理學:理論與實踐。台北:桂冠。\r\n盧美貴(民69) 。國小教師教導方式與學生學習行為之關係。\r\n國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n西文部份\r\nAbimbola, I . O. (1983). The relevance of the \"New\"\r\nphilosophy of science for the science curriculum.\r\nS c h 001 Sci e n c e and JlIf at h e 17l a tic s, 8 3( 3 ), 1 8 1 - 1 9 3 .\r\nAguirre, J. M., Haggerty, S. M., & Linder, C. J. (\r\n1990). Student-teachers` conceptions of science,\r\nteaching and learning: A case study in preservice\r\nscience education. International\r\nJournal of Science education, 14:4), 381-390.\r\nAikenhead, G. S. (1984). The decision making: The\r\ncase of prairie high.Journal of Research tn\r\nSci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 1( 2 ), 1 6 7 - 1 8 6 .\r\nBauch, P . A. (1984). The impact of teachers` tnstructional\r\nbeliefs on their teaching: Implications\r\nfor research and practice. (ERIC\r\nDocument Reproduction Service No. ED 252 954)\r\nBeers, S. E., Bloomingdale, J. R . (1983)Epistemological\r\nand instructional assumptions of\r\ncollege teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction\r\nService No. ED 232 522)\r\nBigge, M. L. (1982).Educational philosophies for\r\nteachers. Ohio: Bell & Howell.\r\nBrickhouse, N. W. (1989a). Teachers` beliefs about\r\nscience and science teaching: Narratives of con-\r\nvictions`actions and constraints. Dissertation\r\nAbstracts International 49/11.\r\nBrickhouse, N. W. (1989b). Teachers content\r\nknowledge about the nature of science and its\r\nrelationship to classroom practice. (ERIC\r\nDocument Reproduction Service No. ED 306 133)\r\nBrickhouse, N. W. (1989c). The teaching of philosophy\r\nof science in secondary classrooms:\r\nCase studies of teachers` personal theories.\r\nInternational Journal of Science Education,\r\n11(4),437-449.\r\nBrickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers` beliefs about\r\nthe nature of science and their relationship to\r\nclassroom practice. Journal of Teacher Educat\r\nion 41 ( 3 ) 53-60.\r\nBrickhouse, N., & Bonder, G. M. (1992). The beginning\r\nscience teacher: Classroom narratives of\r\nconvictions and constraints. Journal of Res\r\near chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 9( 5 ), 4 7 1 - 4 8 5 .\r\nBrousseau, B. A. (1984).Comparing education\r\nbeliefs of teacher candidates and their nonteaching\r\ncounterparts.\r\nBrousseau, B. A. (1984)., Book, C., & Byers, J. L.\r\n( 1 9 8 8`). Tea c her bel i e f san d the cuI t u res 0 f\r\ntea chi n g. lou rna l 0 f Tea c her E d II cat ion, 3 9( 6 ) ,33-39.\r\nBrousseau, B. A., & Freeman, D. 1 . (1988). How do\r\nteacher education faculty members define desirable\r\nteacher beliefs? Teaching and Teacher\r\nEducation, 4(3),267-273.\r\nBurbles, N. C . , & Linn, M. C . (1991). Science education\r\nand philosophy of science: Congruence or\r\ncontradiction? Interactional lournal of Science\r\nEducation, 13(3),227-241.\r\nCalderhead, J. (Ed . ) (1987).Exploring teacher\r\nthinking. London : Mackays.\r\nCampbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology.\r\nI n G era r d R a d nit z k y and W. W . Bar tIe y XII (E d s ) . ,\r\nEvolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the\r\nsociology of knowledge, 47-89. Illinois: Open\r\nCourt.\r\nChang, Tzuchau. (1995). An inveatigation of\r\nTaiwanese graduate students` beliefs about scie\r\nn t i f i c k now led g e .giji &, 4 0, 5 8 3 - 6 1 8 .\r\nClark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers`\r\nthought process. In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.),\r\nHandbook of Research on Teaching(3rd ed.)(pp.\r\n253-296). New York: Macmillan.\r\nClasen, R. E., & Bowman, W. E. (1974). Toward a\r\nstudent-centered learning focus inventory for\r\njunior high and middle school teachers. The\r\nJ 0 urn a I 0 fEd u cat ion a IRe sea r c h, 6 8( 1 ), 9 - 1 1 .\r\nCorporaal, A. H. (1991). Repertory grid research\r\ninto cognitions of prospective primary school\r\nteachers. Teaching and Teacher Education,7(4),315-329.\r\nCronin-Jones, L., & Shaw, E. L. (1992). The\r\ninfluence of methods instruction on the beliefs\r\nof preservice elementary and secondary SCIence\r\nteachers: Preliminary comparative analyses.\r\nS c h 0 0 I Sci e n c e a fl d !vI at hem a tic s, 9 2( 1 ), 1 4 - 2 2 .\r\nDuffee, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum\r\nc han g e, s t u.d e n t e val u a t ion, and tea c her p r act i c a I\r\nknowledge. Science Education, 76(5),493-506.\r\nDuschl, R. A. (1983). Science teachers` belief about\r\nthe nature of science and the selection,implementation,\r\nand development of instructional\r\ntasks: A case study. Dissertation Abstracts\r\nInternational, 45/02.\r\nDuschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of\r\nhigh school teachers` decision making models\r\nfor planning and teaching science. Journal of\r\nRes ear chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 6( 6 ), 467 - 5 0 1 .\r\nForge, 1. C. (1979). A role for philosophy of\r\nscience in the teaching of science. Journal of\r\nPhiloso-phy of Education, 13, 109-118.\r\nFrey, K. M. (1987).Administrative implications of\r\nself-reported instructional beliefs and\r\npractices of secondary school teachers. (PHD.\r\nThe Univer-sity of Arizona). DAI 48/03A.\r\nGallagher, 1. 1. (1991). Prospective and practicing\r\nsecondary school science teachers` knowledge\r\nand beliefs about the philosophy of SClence.\r\nSci e n c e E d u cat ion , 7 5( 1 ), 1 2 1 - 1 3 3 .\r\nHashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers`\r\nepistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of\r\nRes ear chi Il Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 3 3( 1 ), 4 7 - 6 3 .\r\nHodson, D. (1985).Philosophy of science ,SClence\r\nand science education. Studies in Science Education,12, 25-57.\r\nHodson, D. (1986).Philosophy of SCIence and SCIence\r\neducation. Journal of Philosophy of Education,20(2),215-225.\r\nHodson, D.(1993). Philosophic stance of secondary\r\nschool science teachers,curriculum experiences,\r\nand children`s understanding of science:some\r\npreliminary findings. Interchange, 24,41-52.\r\nHook, C. M . & Rosenshine, B. V. (1979). Accuracy\r\nof teacher reports of their classroom behavior.\r\nRev i e W 0 fEd u cat ion a l Res ear c h, 4 9( 1 ), 1 - 1 2 .\r\nKagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on\r\ntea c her bel i e f. Ed u cat i 0 11 alP s y c h 0 log i s t, 2 7( 1 ) ,65-90.\r\nKoulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1988). Use of systematic\r\nnetworks in the development of a questionnaire.\r\nInternational Journal of Science Education,\r\n10(5),497-509 .\r\nKoulaidis, V . , & Ogborn, J. (1989). Philosophy of\r\nscience: An empirical study of teachers` views.\r\nInternational Journal of Science Education,\r\n11(2),173-184.\r\nKoulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1995). Science teachers`\r\nphilosophical assumptions: How well do we\r\nunderstand them? International Journal of\r\nScience Education, 17(3),273-283.\r\nLa n tz, 0., & K as s, H. (1 9 8 7 ) . C he m i s try tea c her s `\r\nfunctional paradigms. Science Education, 71(1),\r\n117-134.\r\nLaudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems:Toward\r\na theory of scientific growth. US: University\r\nof California.\r\nLederman, N. G. (1992). Students` and teachers`\r\nconceptions of the nature of science: A reVlew\r\nof the research. Journal of Research In Science\r\nTeaching, 29(4), 331-359.\r\nLederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science\r\nteachers` conceptions of the nature of science:\r\nDo they really influence teaching behavior.\r\nSci-ence Education, 71(5),721-734.\r\nMoos, R. H. (1979).Evaluating educational\r\nenvironment. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.\r\nMunby, H. (1984). A qualitative approach to the\r\nstudy of a teacher`s beliefs.Journal of Research\r\nin science teaching, 21(1),27-38.\r\nNespor, J. K. (1985).The role of beliefs in the\r\npractice of teaching: Fillal report of the\r\nteacher beliefs study. (ERIC Document\r\nReproduction Service No. ED 270 446)\r\nN e s p 0 r, J. K. (1 9 8 7 ). The r ole 0 f bel i e f sin t·h e\r\npractice of teaching.Journal of Curriculum\r\nStu d - i e s, 1 9( 4 ), 3 1 7 - 3 2 8 .\r\nN i s bet t, R. E., & R 0 s s, L. (1 9 8 0 ) .H u man i n fer e Jl c e :\r\nStrategies andshortcomings of social judgement.\r\nEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.\r\nNussbaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual chang~\r\nphilosophical perspectives. International Journal\r\nof Science Education, 11, 530-540.\r\nOgunniyi, M. B. (1982). An analysis of prospective\r\nscience teachers` understanding of the nature of\r\nscience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,\r\n19(1),25-32.\r\nOgunniyi, M. B., & Pella, M. O. (1980). Conceptualizations\r\nof scientific concepts,laws,and theories\r\nheld by Kwara State,Nigeria secondary\r\nschool science teachers. Science Education, 64\r\n(5),591-599.\r\nPajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers` beliefs and educational\r\nresearch: Cleaning up a messy construct.\r\nRev i e W of Ed u cat ion a l Res ear c h, 6 2( 3 ), 3 07-332.\r\nPerkinson, H. J. (1993).Teachers without goals,\r\nstudents without purposes. New York: McGraw\r\nHill.\r\nPomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers` beliefs\r\nabout the nature of science:Comparison of\r\nthe beliefs of scientists, secondary science\r\nteachers,and elementary teachers.Science Education,\r\n77(3),261-178.\r\nPope, M., & Denicolo, P. (1993). The art and SCIence\r\nof constructive research in teacher think-\r\n\r\n\r\n1 n g. Tea chi n g and Tea c her E d II cat ion, 9( 5 ) ,529-544.\r\nPopper, K. R. (1953,1974). The problem of induction.\r\nIn David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections\r\n(pp.101-117). New Jersey: Princeton University.\r\nPopper, K. R. (1960). The growth of scientific\r\nk now 1 e d g e. I n D a v i d Mill e I` (E d . ) ,P 0 p per\r\nselections(pp.171-180). New Jersey: Princeton University.\r\nPopper, K. R. (1967). Knowledge: Subjective versus\r\nobjective. In David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections(\r\npp . 101-117). New Jersey: Princeton University.(pp.58-77).\r\nPopper, K. R. (1973). Evolutionary epistemology.\r\nIn David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections(pp.78-\r\n86). New Jersey: Princeton University.\r\nPopper, K. R. (1974). Campbell on the evolutionary\r\ntheory of knowledge. In Gerard Radnitzky and\r\nW. W. Bar tIe y ,III (E d s ) . , E vol uti 0 n a r y\r\nepistemology, rationality, and the sociology of\r\nknowledge, 115-120. Illinois: Open Court.\r\nR a d nit z k y, G., & Bar t ley JII W. W. (1 9 8 7 ) . E vol u -\r\ntionary epistemology, rationality, and the\r\nsociology of knowledge. Illinois: Open Court.\r\nRichards, J. (1992).Beginning Professionals`\r\nmeta-phors in an early field placement. (ERIC\r\nDocu-ment Reproduction Service No. ED 3483 5 3 )\r\nRobinson, J. (1969). Philosophy of SCIence: Implication\r\nfor teacher education. Journal of Res\r\near chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g) 6( 1 ), 9 9 - 1 04 .\r\nRowell, J. A., & Cawthron, E. R. (1982). Images of\r\nSCIences: An empirical study. European Journal\r\nof Science Education) 4:1), 79-94.\r\nRubba, P. A. & Anderson, H. O. (1978). Development\r\nof an instrument to assess secondary\r\nschool students` understanding of the nature of\r\nsci e n t i f i c k now 1 e d g e . Sci e n c e Ed u cat ion) 6 2( 4 ) ,449-458.\r\nShavelson, R. J. & Stern, P. (1981). Research on\r\nteachers` pedagogical thoughts,judgements,decisions,\r\nand behavior. Review of Educational Res\r\near c h) 5 1, 4 5 5 - 4 9 8 .\r\nSigel, Irving E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of\r\nbeliefs. In Irving E. Sigel(Eds.),Parental belief\r\nsystems: The psychological consequences for\r\nchildren(pp. 433-456). Hilladale, NJ : Erlbaum.\r\nSigel, Irving E. (1992). The belief-behavior connection\r\n: A resolvable dilemma? In Irving E,\r\nSigel(Eds.), Parental belief systems:the psychological\r\nconsequences for clzildren(pp. 433-456).\r\nHilladale, NJ: Erlbaum.\r\nSmith, D. C., & Neal, D. C. (1989). The construction\r\nof subject matter knowledge in primary\r\nSCIence teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education,5(1), 1-20 .\r\nSutton, C. (1996) . Beliefs about SCIence and beliefs\r\nabout language. Interllational Journal of\r\nScience Education, 18(1), 1-18.\r\nTaylor, P. C. (1990).The influence of teacher\r\nbeliefs on constructivist teaching practices.\r\n(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED\r\n320 883)\r\nTabachnick, B. R. et al. (1982).The impact of the\r\nstudent teaching experience on the development\r\noft e a c her per s p e c t i v e s. ( E RIC D O`c u men t Rep r 0 -\r\nduction Service No. ED 218 251)\r\nTabachnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1985)Ihe\r\ndevelopment of teacher perspectives: Final\r\nreport. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service\r\nNo . ED 266099)\r\nThompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers` beliefs and conceptions:\r\nA synthesis of the research. In D. A.\r\nGrouws(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathe-\r\nmatics Teaching and Learning, 127-146. New\r\nYork: Macmillan.\r\nTobin, K., & Gallagher, I. (1987). What happens In\r\nhigh school science classrooms? Journal of\r\nCurriculum Studies, 19(6),549-560.\r\nTornvall, A. (1987). An investigation into the relationship\r\nbetween teacher beliefs and the philosophy\r\nof Laroplan 69. Journal of Curriculum\r\nStudies, 19(2),175-182.\r\nTuan, H. L. (1991).The influence of preserVlce\r\nsecondary science teachers` beliefs about\r\nscience and pedagogy on their planning and\r\nteaching . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service\r\nNo. ED 332 871)\r\nWehling, L. I., & Charters, W. W. (1969). DimenSlons\r\nof teacher beliefs about the teaching\r\nprocess. American Educational Research\r\nJournal, fK1),7-30.\r\nWellington, T., & Lakin, S. (1994). Who will teach\r\nthe `nature of science?:Teachers` views of\r\nscience and their implications for science education.\r\nInternational Journal of Science Education,\r\n1fi.,2) , 175-190.\r\nWinitzky, N., Kauchak, D., & Kelly, M. (1994).\r\nMeasuring teachers` structural knowledge.\r\nTea chi Il g and Tea c her E d II cat ion, 1 O( 2 ), 1 2 5 -139 .\r\nZeichner, K. M., & Tabachnick, B. R. (1983).\r\nTeacher perspectives ill the face of institutional\r\npress.(ERIC Document Reproduction\r\nService No. ED 240113)
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
83152011
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002776
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 詹志禹zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 潘雅芳zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Pan, Ya-Fangen_US
dc.creator (作者) 潘雅芳zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Pan, Ya-Fangen_US
dc.date (日期) 1995en_US
dc.date.accessioned 28-Apr-2016 15:26:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 28-Apr-2016 15:26:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 28-Apr-2016 15:26:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002002776en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=99484-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 83152011zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究主要目的為:(一)探討不同背景變項的國中教師,其科學信念是否有差異,(二)探究國中教師科學信念與教學信念的關係,(三)探究國中教師科學信念與教學行為的關係,(四)探究國中教師科學信念與教學信念,教學行為的關係.zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章緒論..........1\r\n第一節研究動機與目的..........1\r\n第二節待答問題..........5\r\n第三節重要名詞釋義..........6\r\n第二章文獻探討..........9\r\n第一節信念的概念分析..........9\r\n第二節不同背景變項的教師與科學信念之關係..........22\r\n第三節教師信念與教學行為的關係..........25\r\n第四節從科學哲學的發展探討教師的科學信念..........29\r\n第五節從實證研究探討教師的科學信念..........50\r\n第六節教師科學信念與教學信念、教學行為之關係..........79\r\n第三章研究問題與研究假設..........104\r\n第一節研究問題..........104\r\n第二節研究假設..........106\r\n第四章研究方法..........107\r\n第一節研究架構..........107\r\n第二節實施程序..........108\r\n第三節研究對象..........108\r\n第四節研究工具..........111\r\n第五節資料處理..........128\r\n第五章研究結果..........130\r\n第一節國中教師科學信念現況分析..........130\r\n第二節國中教師科學信念與教學信念的關係..........137\r\n第三節國中教師科學信念與教學行為的關係..........141\r\n第四節國中教師科學信念與教學信念、教學行為整體模式之探索..........146\r\n第六章討論與建議..........151\r\n第一節討論..........151\r\n第二節研究限制..........164\r\n第三節建議..........166\r\n參考書目..........171\r\n附錄一..........188\r\n附錄二..........189\r\n附錄三..........192\r\n附錄四..........197zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002776en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 信念zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 科學信念zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教學信念zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國中教師zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) beliefen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) scientific beliefen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) teaching beliefen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) junior high schoolen_US
dc.title (題名) 國中教師科學信念與教學信念,教學行為的關係zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Relationship between scientific belief,teaching belief and teaching behavior about junior high school teachersen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分:\r\n王道還等譯(Thomas S. Kuhn 著) (民83) 。科學革命的結構\r\nO 台北:遠流O\r\n王俊明(民7 1 )。國小級任教師之領導行為對班級氣氛的影\r\n響O 國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。\r\n江天驟(民77) 。當代西方科學哲學。台北:谷風。\r\n江新合(民82) 。數學及自然科學師資之培訓研究: (血)國中\r\n理化科教學困難和教師內顯特質之相關研究。行政院國\r\n家科學委員會專題研究計釗成果報告。國立高雄師範大學\r\n科教所。\r\n江新合(民83) 。國中理化教師群體信念及心態特質的調查研\r\n究O 國立高雄師範大學學報， 5 ， 159-184 。\r\n汪榮才(民68) 。教師行為、學生制握信念與學業成就。臺南\r\n師專學報， 12 , 1 1 1 - 1 3 1 。\r\n李平寫(民76) 。向科學理性的權威挑戰一科學哲學「頑童」\r\n保羅﹒費若本。當代， 10 ， 13-19\r\n李佳錦(民83) 。國中理化教師的教學信念研究。國立高雄\r\n師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n李章瑋(民84) 。國民小學自然科學潛在課程之研究一以自\r\n然科教師及教學中的科學圖像為例。台北市立師範學院初\r\n教研究所碩士論文。\r\n沈清松(民80) 0 )Mffi~屆質證論的哲學(上)。人文及社會學科教\r\n學通訊， 1(5) ， 190-201 0\r\n吳清lLI (民73) 。臺北市國民中學導師專業教育背景與管教態\r\n度對學生生活適應的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩\r\n士論文。\r\n周寄中譯(Lakatos ， I. & Musgrav ， A 編著) (民82) 。批判\r\n與知識的增長(Criticism and Growth of Knowledge)\r\n。台北:桂冠。\r\n林清財(民79) 。我國國民小學教師教育信念之相關研究。國\r\n立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。\r\n林寶山(民7 1 )。學習環境量表簡介。輔導月刊， 40-41 。\r\n林彩|岫(民76) 。國民中學教師專業自主性之研究。國立臺灣\r\n師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n洪謙(民79) 。邏輯經驗主義論文集。台北:遠流。\r\n洪庸院(民74) 。波柏的科學方法論及其在教育上的意義。國\r\n立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n柯華葳、幸曼玲(民84) 。小學日常教學活動之生態研究。教\r\n改通訊， 12 。\r\n高強華(民8 1 )。教師信念研究及其在學校教育革新上的意\r\n義。國立台灣師範大學教育研究集刊， 34 ， 85-1 日。\r\n徐俊祥(民84) 。課程與教學的反思一一個傳記式研究法的例\r\n子。初等教育學報， 5 (2) ，香港:中文大學香港教育研\r\n究所。\r\n莊文瑞(民76) 。當代科學哲學的轉向一巴怕與孔恩的論辯。\r\n當代， 10 ， 26-36 。\r\n孫:志麟(民79) 。國民小學教師自我效能及相關因素之研究。\r\n國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n郭生玉(民74) 。教師的問按與直接影響行為和學童創造力及\r\n學業成績之關係。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學報，此，\r\n57-84 。\r\n郭重吉(民77) 。從認知的觀點探討自然科學的學習。教育學\r\n院學報， 13 ， 352-378 。\r\n郭重吉(民8 1 )。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改\r\n進。科學發展月刊， 20(5) ， 548-570 0\r\n郭重吉、詐玫理(民8 1 )。從科學哲學觀點的演變探討科學教\r\n育的過去與未來。彰化師範大學學報， 3 ， 531-5610\r\n許攻理(民8 1 )。我國國民中學自然科學教師科學哲學觀點之\r\n調查研究。國立彰化師純大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n張巨育、吳寅華(民83) 。邏輯與歷史一現代科學方法論的擅\r\n變。台北:淑馨。\r\n張芬芬(民73) 。師大結業生分發實習前後教學態度與任教意\r\n願之比較研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n張芬芬(民80) 。師範生教育實習中泊在課程之人種誌研究。\r\n國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n|凍英豪、吳裕盆、李坤崇(民79) 。教師態度量表修訂報告。\r\n測驗年刊， 37 , 25-33 。\r\n陳衛平譯(Larry Laudan 著) (民8 1 )。科學的進步與問題。\r\n台北:桂冠。\r\n舒光(民82) 。科學哲學導論。台北:水牛。\r\n白:煒光(民83) 。科學哲學導論。台北:五悶。\r\n舒煒光、邱仁宗(民79) 。當代西方科學哲學述評。台北:水牛。\r\n黃鴻艾(民70) 。學校經驗對國中教師教室領導行為的影響。\r\n國立臺灣師i向大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n詹仕鑫(民78) 。我國國民中學科學教師教學風格之研究。國\r\n立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n!當志禹(民83) 。理性思考教學模式對科學態度及民主精神之\r\n影響。教育部顧問室委託研究報告，編號83-3-M-001o\r\n倉志禹、吳璧純(民8 1 )。邏輯實證論的迷思。思與言， 30(1)101-121\r\n趙金祁、許榮富、黃芳裕(民8 1 )。科學哲學對科學知識主體\r\n主張的演變。科學教育月刊， 154 ， 2 ， 18 。\r\n趟金祁、許榮富、與黃芳裕(民82) 。科學哲學對組成科學知\r\n識之主張及其演變。科學教育月刊， 161 ， 4-17 。\r\n蔡坤鴻譯(Karl R. Popp 盯著) (民78) 。臆測與駁斥(上) - -\r\n科學知識的成長。台北:幼獅。\r\n鄭呈因(民83) 。國中理化科實習教師教學個案研究。國立高\r\n雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n鄭昭明(民83) 。認知心理學:理論與實踐。台北:桂冠。\r\n盧美貴(民69) 。國小教師教導方式與學生學習行為之關係。\r\n國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n西文部份\r\nAbimbola, I . O. (1983). The relevance of the \"New\"\r\nphilosophy of science for the science curriculum.\r\nS c h 001 Sci e n c e and JlIf at h e 17l a tic s, 8 3( 3 ), 1 8 1 - 1 9 3 .\r\nAguirre, J. M., Haggerty, S. M., & Linder, C. J. (\r\n1990). Student-teachers` conceptions of science,\r\nteaching and learning: A case study in preservice\r\nscience education. International\r\nJournal of Science education, 14:4), 381-390.\r\nAikenhead, G. S. (1984). The decision making: The\r\ncase of prairie high.Journal of Research tn\r\nSci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 1( 2 ), 1 6 7 - 1 8 6 .\r\nBauch, P . A. (1984). The impact of teachers` tnstructional\r\nbeliefs on their teaching: Implications\r\nfor research and practice. (ERIC\r\nDocument Reproduction Service No. ED 252 954)\r\nBeers, S. E., Bloomingdale, J. R . (1983)Epistemological\r\nand instructional assumptions of\r\ncollege teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction\r\nService No. ED 232 522)\r\nBigge, M. L. (1982).Educational philosophies for\r\nteachers. Ohio: Bell & Howell.\r\nBrickhouse, N. W. (1989a). Teachers` beliefs about\r\nscience and science teaching: Narratives of con-\r\nvictions`actions and constraints. Dissertation\r\nAbstracts International 49/11.\r\nBrickhouse, N. W. (1989b). Teachers content\r\nknowledge about the nature of science and its\r\nrelationship to classroom practice. (ERIC\r\nDocument Reproduction Service No. ED 306 133)\r\nBrickhouse, N. W. (1989c). The teaching of philosophy\r\nof science in secondary classrooms:\r\nCase studies of teachers` personal theories.\r\nInternational Journal of Science Education,\r\n11(4),437-449.\r\nBrickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers` beliefs about\r\nthe nature of science and their relationship to\r\nclassroom practice. Journal of Teacher Educat\r\nion 41 ( 3 ) 53-60.\r\nBrickhouse, N., & Bonder, G. M. (1992). The beginning\r\nscience teacher: Classroom narratives of\r\nconvictions and constraints. Journal of Res\r\near chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 9( 5 ), 4 7 1 - 4 8 5 .\r\nBrousseau, B. A. (1984).Comparing education\r\nbeliefs of teacher candidates and their nonteaching\r\ncounterparts.\r\nBrousseau, B. A. (1984)., Book, C., & Byers, J. L.\r\n( 1 9 8 8`). Tea c her bel i e f san d the cuI t u res 0 f\r\ntea chi n g. lou rna l 0 f Tea c her E d II cat ion, 3 9( 6 ) ,33-39.\r\nBrousseau, B. A., & Freeman, D. 1 . (1988). How do\r\nteacher education faculty members define desirable\r\nteacher beliefs? Teaching and Teacher\r\nEducation, 4(3),267-273.\r\nBurbles, N. C . , & Linn, M. C . (1991). Science education\r\nand philosophy of science: Congruence or\r\ncontradiction? Interactional lournal of Science\r\nEducation, 13(3),227-241.\r\nCalderhead, J. (Ed . ) (1987).Exploring teacher\r\nthinking. London : Mackays.\r\nCampbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology.\r\nI n G era r d R a d nit z k y and W. W . Bar tIe y XII (E d s ) . ,\r\nEvolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the\r\nsociology of knowledge, 47-89. Illinois: Open\r\nCourt.\r\nChang, Tzuchau. (1995). An inveatigation of\r\nTaiwanese graduate students` beliefs about scie\r\nn t i f i c k now led g e .giji &, 4 0, 5 8 3 - 6 1 8 .\r\nClark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers`\r\nthought process. In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.),\r\nHandbook of Research on Teaching(3rd ed.)(pp.\r\n253-296). New York: Macmillan.\r\nClasen, R. E., & Bowman, W. E. (1974). Toward a\r\nstudent-centered learning focus inventory for\r\njunior high and middle school teachers. The\r\nJ 0 urn a I 0 fEd u cat ion a IRe sea r c h, 6 8( 1 ), 9 - 1 1 .\r\nCorporaal, A. H. (1991). Repertory grid research\r\ninto cognitions of prospective primary school\r\nteachers. Teaching and Teacher Education,7(4),315-329.\r\nCronin-Jones, L., & Shaw, E. L. (1992). The\r\ninfluence of methods instruction on the beliefs\r\nof preservice elementary and secondary SCIence\r\nteachers: Preliminary comparative analyses.\r\nS c h 0 0 I Sci e n c e a fl d !vI at hem a tic s, 9 2( 1 ), 1 4 - 2 2 .\r\nDuffee, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum\r\nc han g e, s t u.d e n t e val u a t ion, and tea c her p r act i c a I\r\nknowledge. Science Education, 76(5),493-506.\r\nDuschl, R. A. (1983). Science teachers` belief about\r\nthe nature of science and the selection,implementation,\r\nand development of instructional\r\ntasks: A case study. Dissertation Abstracts\r\nInternational, 45/02.\r\nDuschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of\r\nhigh school teachers` decision making models\r\nfor planning and teaching science. Journal of\r\nRes ear chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 6( 6 ), 467 - 5 0 1 .\r\nForge, 1. C. (1979). A role for philosophy of\r\nscience in the teaching of science. Journal of\r\nPhiloso-phy of Education, 13, 109-118.\r\nFrey, K. M. (1987).Administrative implications of\r\nself-reported instructional beliefs and\r\npractices of secondary school teachers. (PHD.\r\nThe Univer-sity of Arizona). DAI 48/03A.\r\nGallagher, 1. 1. (1991). Prospective and practicing\r\nsecondary school science teachers` knowledge\r\nand beliefs about the philosophy of SClence.\r\nSci e n c e E d u cat ion , 7 5( 1 ), 1 2 1 - 1 3 3 .\r\nHashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers`\r\nepistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of\r\nRes ear chi Il Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 3 3( 1 ), 4 7 - 6 3 .\r\nHodson, D. (1985).Philosophy of science ,SClence\r\nand science education. Studies in Science Education,12, 25-57.\r\nHodson, D. (1986).Philosophy of SCIence and SCIence\r\neducation. Journal of Philosophy of Education,20(2),215-225.\r\nHodson, D.(1993). Philosophic stance of secondary\r\nschool science teachers,curriculum experiences,\r\nand children`s understanding of science:some\r\npreliminary findings. Interchange, 24,41-52.\r\nHook, C. M . & Rosenshine, B. V. (1979). Accuracy\r\nof teacher reports of their classroom behavior.\r\nRev i e W 0 fEd u cat ion a l Res ear c h, 4 9( 1 ), 1 - 1 2 .\r\nKagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on\r\ntea c her bel i e f. Ed u cat i 0 11 alP s y c h 0 log i s t, 2 7( 1 ) ,65-90.\r\nKoulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1988). Use of systematic\r\nnetworks in the development of a questionnaire.\r\nInternational Journal of Science Education,\r\n10(5),497-509 .\r\nKoulaidis, V . , & Ogborn, J. (1989). Philosophy of\r\nscience: An empirical study of teachers` views.\r\nInternational Journal of Science Education,\r\n11(2),173-184.\r\nKoulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1995). Science teachers`\r\nphilosophical assumptions: How well do we\r\nunderstand them? International Journal of\r\nScience Education, 17(3),273-283.\r\nLa n tz, 0., & K as s, H. (1 9 8 7 ) . C he m i s try tea c her s `\r\nfunctional paradigms. Science Education, 71(1),\r\n117-134.\r\nLaudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems:Toward\r\na theory of scientific growth. US: University\r\nof California.\r\nLederman, N. G. (1992). Students` and teachers`\r\nconceptions of the nature of science: A reVlew\r\nof the research. Journal of Research In Science\r\nTeaching, 29(4), 331-359.\r\nLederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science\r\nteachers` conceptions of the nature of science:\r\nDo they really influence teaching behavior.\r\nSci-ence Education, 71(5),721-734.\r\nMoos, R. H. (1979).Evaluating educational\r\nenvironment. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.\r\nMunby, H. (1984). A qualitative approach to the\r\nstudy of a teacher`s beliefs.Journal of Research\r\nin science teaching, 21(1),27-38.\r\nNespor, J. K. (1985).The role of beliefs in the\r\npractice of teaching: Fillal report of the\r\nteacher beliefs study. (ERIC Document\r\nReproduction Service No. ED 270 446)\r\nN e s p 0 r, J. K. (1 9 8 7 ). The r ole 0 f bel i e f sin t·h e\r\npractice of teaching.Journal of Curriculum\r\nStu d - i e s, 1 9( 4 ), 3 1 7 - 3 2 8 .\r\nN i s bet t, R. E., & R 0 s s, L. (1 9 8 0 ) .H u man i n fer e Jl c e :\r\nStrategies andshortcomings of social judgement.\r\nEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.\r\nNussbaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual chang~\r\nphilosophical perspectives. International Journal\r\nof Science Education, 11, 530-540.\r\nOgunniyi, M. B. (1982). An analysis of prospective\r\nscience teachers` understanding of the nature of\r\nscience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,\r\n19(1),25-32.\r\nOgunniyi, M. B., & Pella, M. O. (1980). Conceptualizations\r\nof scientific concepts,laws,and theories\r\nheld by Kwara State,Nigeria secondary\r\nschool science teachers. Science Education, 64\r\n(5),591-599.\r\nPajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers` beliefs and educational\r\nresearch: Cleaning up a messy construct.\r\nRev i e W of Ed u cat ion a l Res ear c h, 6 2( 3 ), 3 07-332.\r\nPerkinson, H. J. (1993).Teachers without goals,\r\nstudents without purposes. New York: McGraw\r\nHill.\r\nPomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers` beliefs\r\nabout the nature of science:Comparison of\r\nthe beliefs of scientists, secondary science\r\nteachers,and elementary teachers.Science Education,\r\n77(3),261-178.\r\nPope, M., & Denicolo, P. (1993). The art and SCIence\r\nof constructive research in teacher think-\r\n\r\n\r\n1 n g. Tea chi n g and Tea c her E d II cat ion, 9( 5 ) ,529-544.\r\nPopper, K. R. (1953,1974). The problem of induction.\r\nIn David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections\r\n(pp.101-117). New Jersey: Princeton University.\r\nPopper, K. R. (1960). The growth of scientific\r\nk now 1 e d g e. I n D a v i d Mill e I` (E d . ) ,P 0 p per\r\nselections(pp.171-180). New Jersey: Princeton University.\r\nPopper, K. R. (1967). Knowledge: Subjective versus\r\nobjective. In David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections(\r\npp . 101-117). New Jersey: Princeton University.(pp.58-77).\r\nPopper, K. R. (1973). Evolutionary epistemology.\r\nIn David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections(pp.78-\r\n86). New Jersey: Princeton University.\r\nPopper, K. R. (1974). Campbell on the evolutionary\r\ntheory of knowledge. In Gerard Radnitzky and\r\nW. W. Bar tIe y ,III (E d s ) . , E vol uti 0 n a r y\r\nepistemology, rationality, and the sociology of\r\nknowledge, 115-120. Illinois: Open Court.\r\nR a d nit z k y, G., & Bar t ley JII W. W. (1 9 8 7 ) . E vol u -\r\ntionary epistemology, rationality, and the\r\nsociology of knowledge. Illinois: Open Court.\r\nRichards, J. (1992).Beginning Professionals`\r\nmeta-phors in an early field placement. (ERIC\r\nDocu-ment Reproduction Service No. ED 3483 5 3 )\r\nRobinson, J. (1969). Philosophy of SCIence: Implication\r\nfor teacher education. Journal of Res\r\near chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g) 6( 1 ), 9 9 - 1 04 .\r\nRowell, J. A., & Cawthron, E. R. (1982). Images of\r\nSCIences: An empirical study. European Journal\r\nof Science Education) 4:1), 79-94.\r\nRubba, P. A. & Anderson, H. O. (1978). Development\r\nof an instrument to assess secondary\r\nschool students` understanding of the nature of\r\nsci e n t i f i c k now 1 e d g e . Sci e n c e Ed u cat ion) 6 2( 4 ) ,449-458.\r\nShavelson, R. J. & Stern, P. (1981). Research on\r\nteachers` pedagogical thoughts,judgements,decisions,\r\nand behavior. Review of Educational Res\r\near c h) 5 1, 4 5 5 - 4 9 8 .\r\nSigel, Irving E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of\r\nbeliefs. In Irving E. Sigel(Eds.),Parental belief\r\nsystems: The psychological consequences for\r\nchildren(pp. 433-456). Hilladale, NJ : Erlbaum.\r\nSigel, Irving E. (1992). The belief-behavior connection\r\n: A resolvable dilemma? In Irving E,\r\nSigel(Eds.), Parental belief systems:the psychological\r\nconsequences for clzildren(pp. 433-456).\r\nHilladale, NJ: Erlbaum.\r\nSmith, D. C., & Neal, D. C. (1989). The construction\r\nof subject matter knowledge in primary\r\nSCIence teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education,5(1), 1-20 .\r\nSutton, C. (1996) . Beliefs about SCIence and beliefs\r\nabout language. Interllational Journal of\r\nScience Education, 18(1), 1-18.\r\nTaylor, P. C. (1990).The influence of teacher\r\nbeliefs on constructivist teaching practices.\r\n(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED\r\n320 883)\r\nTabachnick, B. R. et al. (1982).The impact of the\r\nstudent teaching experience on the development\r\noft e a c her per s p e c t i v e s. ( E RIC D O`c u men t Rep r 0 -\r\nduction Service No. ED 218 251)\r\nTabachnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1985)Ihe\r\ndevelopment of teacher perspectives: Final\r\nreport. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service\r\nNo . ED 266099)\r\nThompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers` beliefs and conceptions:\r\nA synthesis of the research. In D. A.\r\nGrouws(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathe-\r\nmatics Teaching and Learning, 127-146. New\r\nYork: Macmillan.\r\nTobin, K., & Gallagher, I. (1987). What happens In\r\nhigh school science classrooms? Journal of\r\nCurriculum Studies, 19(6),549-560.\r\nTornvall, A. (1987). An investigation into the relationship\r\nbetween teacher beliefs and the philosophy\r\nof Laroplan 69. Journal of Curriculum\r\nStudies, 19(2),175-182.\r\nTuan, H. L. (1991).The influence of preserVlce\r\nsecondary science teachers` beliefs about\r\nscience and pedagogy on their planning and\r\nteaching . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service\r\nNo. ED 332 871)\r\nWehling, L. I., & Charters, W. W. (1969). DimenSlons\r\nof teacher beliefs about the teaching\r\nprocess. American Educational Research\r\nJournal, fK1),7-30.\r\nWellington, T., & Lakin, S. (1994). Who will teach\r\nthe `nature of science?:Teachers` views of\r\nscience and their implications for science education.\r\nInternational Journal of Science Education,\r\n1fi.,2) , 175-190.\r\nWinitzky, N., Kauchak, D., & Kelly, M. (1994).\r\nMeasuring teachers` structural knowledge.\r\nTea chi Il g and Tea c her E d II cat ion, 1 O( 2 ), 1 2 5 -139 .\r\nZeichner, K. M., & Tabachnick, B. R. (1983).\r\nTeacher perspectives ill the face of institutional\r\npress.(ERIC Document Reproduction\r\nService No. ED 240113)zh_TW