學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 例題變異性與習作方式對國小學童數學類比解題之影響
作者 蔡駿暉
Cai, Jun-Hui
貢獻者 鄭晉昌
Zheng, Jin-Chang
蔡駿暉
Cai, Jun-Hui
日期 1995
上傳時間 28-Apr-2016 15:27:00 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究的旨趣在於檢視數學文字題的練習過程中,習題變異性與習作方式對國小學童在後續類比解題的影響。藉由實驗設計的方式,操弄習題變異性的高低(全等問題/同構問題)及不同習作方式(完全練習/部分解答/完全解答),來探討二者對受試在題意理解、近遷移測驗與遠遷移測驗的直接效果及交互作用。
參考文獻 林清山譯(民82)。教育心理學━認知取向。台北:遠流。
     唐淑華(民78)。「語文理解課程」對增進國一學生數學理解能力與解答應用問題能力之實驗研究。國立台灣師範大學教育,心理與航導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
     黃幸美(民83)。兒童的類比推理思考與發展。教育與心理研究,17,477-506.
     黃幸美(民84a)。類比推理的教學方法之探討。教育研究雙月刊,41, 61-69。
     黃幸美(民84b)。兒童在數學問題上的類比推理思考之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
     張麗芬(民82)。兒童類比推理能力之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
     蔣治邦(民81)。三、四年級學童解決多餘資訊與兩步驟加減應用問題能力之探討。中國心理學會通訊,25,36。
     國立結譯館(民84a)。國民小學數學第十冊改編本再版。台北:國立編譯館。
     國立編譯館(民84b)。國民小學數學教師手冊第十冊改編本再版。台北:國立編譯館。
     國立編譯館(民84c)。國民小學數學第十一冊改編本再版。台北:國立編譯館。
     國立編譯館(民84d)。國民小學數學教師手冊第十一冊改編本再版。台北:國立編譯館。
     Anderson, J. R., & Ross, T. (1989). Use of analogy in a production system architec-ture. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortouy (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, p267-287. Cambridge: Cambtidge University Press.
     Bassok, M. & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics ill algebra and physics . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and, Cognition, 15, 153-166.
     Bassok, M. & Holyoak, K. J. (1993). Pragmatic knowledge and conceptual stmcture: cletennillants of transfer between quantitative` domains. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: intelligence, cognition, and instruction (p.68-98). Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
     Bejar,I. I, Cbaffin, R. & Embretson, S. (1991). Cognitive and Psychometric Analysis of Analogical Problem Solving. New York: Springer-Verlag.
     BroWll, A. L. & Kane, M. J. (1988). Preschool children ca leaming to transfer: leanullg to leam and leaming [rom example. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 493-523.
     Donelly, C. M., & McDaniel, M. A. (l993). Use of analog in leanting scientific concepts. Journal of E`(perimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 975-987.
     Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147-1156.
     Canoll, W. M. (1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 , 360-367.
     Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instmction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
     Chen, P. W., Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning scheruas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391-416.
     Chen, P. W., Holyo{lk, K. 1., Nesbett, R. E., & Oliver, L. M. (1986). Pragmatic versus syntactic approacbes to lraiurng deductive reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 18,293-328.
     Chi, M. T. H., Feltovicb, P. 1.,& Glaser, R. (1981)Categorizatiou and representation of physics problems by experts aud uovices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121- 152.
     Cooper, G. & Sweller, 1. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation ou mathematical problem solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347-362.
     Flied, L. S. & Holyoak, K. 1. (1984). Induction of category distributions: A framwork for classification learning. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 234-257.
     Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K 1. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psycho-logy, 12, 306-355.
     Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. 1. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
     Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. 1. (1987). The sogl.l.itive basis of knowledge trausfer. In S. M. Connier, & 1. D. Hagman (Eds.)Transfer of learning: Com temporary research and application, (pp. 9-46). San Fransisco: Academic Press.
     Gick, M. L. & Paterson, K (1992). Do contrasting examples facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 539-550.
     Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping : A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
     Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosruadou & A. Ortouy (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, p 199-233. CambIidge: Camblidge University Press.
     Gentner, D., & Gentner, D. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In A. Stevens & D. Gentner (Eds.), Mental Models, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaulll Associates.
     Gentner, D. & Jeziorskj, M. (1989). Hist01ical slufts in the use of analogy in science. In B. Gholson, W. R. Shadisil, JR., R. A. Neimeyer, A. C.
     Houts(Eds.), Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience, (p .296-325). NY: Cambridge Un.iversity Press.
     Gentner, D. & Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and sur£1ce similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277-300.
     Goe~ V., & PiroUi, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16, 359-429.
     Holyoak, K. 1. (1984). Analogical thinking and human intelligence. In R. 1. Stemberg (Ed.)Advances in tlte Psychology of human intelligence (vol. 2, pp. 199-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     Holyoak, K. J. (1985). The pragmatics of analogical transfer. In G. H. Bower
     (Ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Instruction, v.19, (pp. 59-87.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
     Holyoak, K. J. & Thagard, P. It (1989a). A computational model of analogical problem solving. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, (pp . 242-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . .
     Holyoak, K. J. & Thagard, P. R. (1989b). Analogical mapping by constraint satis-faction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
     Homa, D., & Cultice, J. (1984). Role of feedback, category size, and stimulus distortion 011 the acquisition and utilization of ill-defined categotries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 83-94.
     Kahlley, H. (1993). Problem Solving: Acognitive Approach (2nd ed). PA: Open University Press.
     Keane, M. T. (1988). Analogy Problem Solving. El1glan: Ellis Horwood. Keane, M., T., Ledgeway, T., & Duff, S. (1994). Constraints Oil analogical mapping: A comparison of tiJree models. Cognitive science, 18, 387-438.
     Kintscll, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic pro-blems. Psychology Review, 92, 109-129.
     Kotovsky, K, Hayes, 1. R., & Simon, H. A. (1985). W11Y are some problems hard? evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248-
     294.
     Lewis, A. B. (1989). Training studellts to represent arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 521-53l.
     Lewis, A. B., & Mayer, R. E. (1987). Students` miscomprehension of relational statements ill arithmetic word problems, Journal of Educational Psychology, 79,363-371.
     Marclls, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 49-63
     Mayer, A. B. (1985). Mathematical ability. In R. 1. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities:An information processing approach (pp. 127-154). San Francisco: Freeman.
     Mawer, R. F. & Sweller, J. (1982). Effects of subgoal density and location on meaning during problem solving. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8 , 252-259.
     Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and Experitise. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, memory, and Cognition, 14, 510-520.
     Novick, L. R. & Hmel0, C. E. (1994). Transferring symbolic representations across nonisomorplic problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1296-1321.
     Novick, L. K. & Holyoak, K. L. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17,398-415.
     Owen, E. & Sweller, J. (1985). \\\\l11at do Students learn while solving mathematics problems? Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 272-284.
     Paas, F. (1992). Training stragies for attaining transfer of problem solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429-434.
     Paas, F. & Van Merrienboer, J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122-133 .
     Phye, G. D. (1989). Schemata training and transfer of an intellectual skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81,347-352.
     Phye, G. D. (1990). Inductive problem solving: Schema inducement and memory-based transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 826-83l.
     Pierce, K. A., Ducan, M. K., Gholson, B., Ray, G. E. & Kamhi, A. G. (1993). Cognitive load, schema acquisition, and procedural adaptation ill nonisomorphic analogical transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 66-74.
     Quilici, J. L. & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Roles of examples in how students learn to categorize statistic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 144-161.
     Riley, M. S., & Greeno, J. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and
     Instruction, 5,49-101.
     Reed, S. K. (1987). A stl1lcture-mapping model for word problems. Journal
     of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition, 13, 124- 139.
     Reed, S. K., Dempster, A., & Ettinger, M. (1985). Usefullness of analogous solution for solving algebrs word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition, 11, 106-125.
     Reed, S. K., Willis, D., & GuaIino, J. (1994). Selecting examples for solving word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86,380-388.
     Reed, S. K. (1993). A schema-based theory of transfer. In D. K. Dettennan & R. 1. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: intelligence, cognition, and instruction (p.39-67). Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
     Reevs, L. M. (1994). Schema abstraction and conservative induction in analogical transfer (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University). Dissertation Abstracts Interactional.
     Robins, S. & Mayer, R. E. (1993). Schema training ill analogical reasouing.Jollrl1al of Educational Psychology, 85, 529-538.
     Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition., 13, 629-639.
     Ross, B. H. (1989a). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Defferent effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognitioll, 15, 456-468.
     Ross, B. H. (1989b). Remindings in leaming and instruction. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, (pp. 438-469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Ross, B. H., & Kennedy, P. T. (1990). Generalizing form the use of earlier examples in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 42-55.
     Rumelhalt, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. 1. Spiro, B. c., Bmce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawreuce Erlbaum Associates.
     Rllmelhatt, D. E. & Oltony, A. (1978). Accretion, tuning, and restructuring: Three modes of teaming. In 1. W. Gotton & R. Klatzkg (Eels.), Semantic Factors in Cognition, NJ: Erlbaum.
     Schomfeld, A. H. & Hernnann, D. 1. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychoology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 484-494.
     Simon, P. R. J. (1984). Instruction with analogies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 513-527.
     Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). If Saddam is Hitler then who is George Bush? Analogical mapping between systems of social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 913-933.
     Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L. & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, (pp. 498-528. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Spiro, R. J., Vispoel, W. L., Schmitz, 1. G., Samaraptmgavau, A. & Boerger, A. E. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Coguitive lecibility and transfer in complex content domains. In B. K. Britton & S. Glym (Eds.), Executive Control Process, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological
     Review, 84, 353-378.
     Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
     Sweller, J. (1989). Cognitive technology: some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving ill mathematics and science. Journal of
     Educational Psychology, 81, 457-466.
     Tarmizi, R. A. & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424-436.
     Tagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy in science. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
     Vosniadou, S. (1989). Analogical reasoning as a mechanism in knowledge acquisition: a developmental perspective. In S. Vosmadou & A. Ortony(Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, p413-422. CambIidge: Cambridge University Press.
     Vosniadou, S. & Oltony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogy reasoning: a synthesis. In S. Voslliadou & A. Oltony (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, p 1-15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Weaver, C. A. & Kintsch, W. (1992). Enhancing students` comprehensive of the conceptual structure of algebra word problems. Journal of Educational Psycho-logy, 84 (4), 419-428.
     Yang, Clm-Ling & Wedman, J. F. (1993). A study of tile conditions influencing analogical problem solving. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26 (4), 213-22l.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002003010
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 鄭晉昌zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Zheng, Jin-Changen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蔡駿暉zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Cai, Jun-Huien_US
dc.creator (作者) 蔡駿暉zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Cai, Jun-Huien_US
dc.date (日期) 1995en_US
dc.date.accessioned 28-Apr-2016 15:27:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 28-Apr-2016 15:27:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 28-Apr-2016 15:27:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002003010en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/87687-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究的旨趣在於檢視數學文字題的練習過程中,習題變異性與習作方式對國小學童在後續類比解題的影響。藉由實驗設計的方式,操弄習題變異性的高低(全等問題/同構問題)及不同習作方式(完全練習/部分解答/完全解答),來探討二者對受試在題意理解、近遷移測驗與遠遷移測驗的直接效果及交互作用。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章緒論..........1
     第一節研究動機..........1
     第二節研究目的與問題..........5
     第三節主要名詞釋..........7
     第四節研究限制..........12
     第二章文獻探討..........14
     第一節類比推理的性質..........11
     第二節類比推理理論的探討..........17
     第三節問題基模的形成..........
     第四節數學類比解題研究之探討..........
     第五節認知負載的影響..........
     第三章研究方法..........54
     第一節研究工具及樣本..........55
     第二節研究程序..........
     第三節資料分析..........60
     第四章研究結果與討論..........63
     第一節研究結果..........63
     第二節結果討論..........71
     第五章結論與建議..........78
     第一節結論..........78
     第二節建議..........80
     參考書目..........83
     附錄
zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002003010en_US
dc.title (題名) 例題變異性與習作方式對國小學童數學類比解題之影響zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林清山譯(民82)。教育心理學━認知取向。台北:遠流。
     唐淑華(民78)。「語文理解課程」對增進國一學生數學理解能力與解答應用問題能力之實驗研究。國立台灣師範大學教育,心理與航導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
     黃幸美(民83)。兒童的類比推理思考與發展。教育與心理研究,17,477-506.
     黃幸美(民84a)。類比推理的教學方法之探討。教育研究雙月刊,41, 61-69。
     黃幸美(民84b)。兒童在數學問題上的類比推理思考之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
     張麗芬(民82)。兒童類比推理能力之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
     蔣治邦(民81)。三、四年級學童解決多餘資訊與兩步驟加減應用問題能力之探討。中國心理學會通訊,25,36。
     國立結譯館(民84a)。國民小學數學第十冊改編本再版。台北:國立編譯館。
     國立編譯館(民84b)。國民小學數學教師手冊第十冊改編本再版。台北:國立編譯館。
     國立編譯館(民84c)。國民小學數學第十一冊改編本再版。台北:國立編譯館。
     國立編譯館(民84d)。國民小學數學教師手冊第十一冊改編本再版。台北:國立編譯館。
     Anderson, J. R., & Ross, T. (1989). Use of analogy in a production system architec-ture. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortouy (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, p267-287. Cambridge: Cambtidge University Press.
     Bassok, M. & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics ill algebra and physics . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and, Cognition, 15, 153-166.
     Bassok, M. & Holyoak, K. J. (1993). Pragmatic knowledge and conceptual stmcture: cletennillants of transfer between quantitative` domains. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: intelligence, cognition, and instruction (p.68-98). Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
     Bejar,I. I, Cbaffin, R. & Embretson, S. (1991). Cognitive and Psychometric Analysis of Analogical Problem Solving. New York: Springer-Verlag.
     BroWll, A. L. & Kane, M. J. (1988). Preschool children ca leaming to transfer: leanullg to leam and leaming [rom example. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 493-523.
     Donelly, C. M., & McDaniel, M. A. (l993). Use of analog in leanting scientific concepts. Journal of E`(perimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 975-987.
     Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147-1156.
     Canoll, W. M. (1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86 , 360-367.
     Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instmction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
     Chen, P. W., Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning scheruas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391-416.
     Chen, P. W., Holyo{lk, K. 1., Nesbett, R. E., & Oliver, L. M. (1986). Pragmatic versus syntactic approacbes to lraiurng deductive reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 18,293-328.
     Chi, M. T. H., Feltovicb, P. 1.,& Glaser, R. (1981)Categorizatiou and representation of physics problems by experts aud uovices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121- 152.
     Cooper, G. & Sweller, 1. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation ou mathematical problem solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347-362.
     Flied, L. S. & Holyoak, K. 1. (1984). Induction of category distributions: A framwork for classification learning. Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 234-257.
     Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K 1. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psycho-logy, 12, 306-355.
     Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. 1. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
     Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. 1. (1987). The sogl.l.itive basis of knowledge trausfer. In S. M. Connier, & 1. D. Hagman (Eds.)Transfer of learning: Com temporary research and application, (pp. 9-46). San Fransisco: Academic Press.
     Gick, M. L. & Paterson, K (1992). Do contrasting examples facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 539-550.
     Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping : A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
     Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosruadou & A. Ortouy (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, p 199-233. CambIidge: Camblidge University Press.
     Gentner, D., & Gentner, D. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In A. Stevens & D. Gentner (Eds.), Mental Models, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaulll Associates.
     Gentner, D. & Jeziorskj, M. (1989). Hist01ical slufts in the use of analogy in science. In B. Gholson, W. R. Shadisil, JR., R. A. Neimeyer, A. C.
     Houts(Eds.), Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience, (p .296-325). NY: Cambridge Un.iversity Press.
     Gentner, D. & Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and sur£1ce similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277-300.
     Goe~ V., & PiroUi, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16, 359-429.
     Holyoak, K. 1. (1984). Analogical thinking and human intelligence. In R. 1. Stemberg (Ed.)Advances in tlte Psychology of human intelligence (vol. 2, pp. 199-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     Holyoak, K. J. (1985). The pragmatics of analogical transfer. In G. H. Bower
     (Ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Instruction, v.19, (pp. 59-87.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
     Holyoak, K. J. & Thagard, P. It (1989a). A computational model of analogical problem solving. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, (pp . 242-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . .
     Holyoak, K. J. & Thagard, P. R. (1989b). Analogical mapping by constraint satis-faction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
     Homa, D., & Cultice, J. (1984). Role of feedback, category size, and stimulus distortion 011 the acquisition and utilization of ill-defined categotries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 83-94.
     Kahlley, H. (1993). Problem Solving: Acognitive Approach (2nd ed). PA: Open University Press.
     Keane, M. T. (1988). Analogy Problem Solving. El1glan: Ellis Horwood. Keane, M., T., Ledgeway, T., & Duff, S. (1994). Constraints Oil analogical mapping: A comparison of tiJree models. Cognitive science, 18, 387-438.
     Kintscll, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic pro-blems. Psychology Review, 92, 109-129.
     Kotovsky, K, Hayes, 1. R., & Simon, H. A. (1985). W11Y are some problems hard? evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248-
     294.
     Lewis, A. B. (1989). Training studellts to represent arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 521-53l.
     Lewis, A. B., & Mayer, R. E. (1987). Students` miscomprehension of relational statements ill arithmetic word problems, Journal of Educational Psychology, 79,363-371.
     Marclls, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 49-63
     Mayer, A. B. (1985). Mathematical ability. In R. 1. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities:An information processing approach (pp. 127-154). San Francisco: Freeman.
     Mawer, R. F. & Sweller, J. (1982). Effects of subgoal density and location on meaning during problem solving. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8 , 252-259.
     Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and Experitise. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, memory, and Cognition, 14, 510-520.
     Novick, L. R. & Hmel0, C. E. (1994). Transferring symbolic representations across nonisomorplic problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1296-1321.
     Novick, L. K. & Holyoak, K. L. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17,398-415.
     Owen, E. & Sweller, J. (1985). \\\\l11at do Students learn while solving mathematics problems? Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 272-284.
     Paas, F. (1992). Training stragies for attaining transfer of problem solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429-434.
     Paas, F. & Van Merrienboer, J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122-133 .
     Phye, G. D. (1989). Schemata training and transfer of an intellectual skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81,347-352.
     Phye, G. D. (1990). Inductive problem solving: Schema inducement and memory-based transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 826-83l.
     Pierce, K. A., Ducan, M. K., Gholson, B., Ray, G. E. & Kamhi, A. G. (1993). Cognitive load, schema acquisition, and procedural adaptation ill nonisomorphic analogical transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 66-74.
     Quilici, J. L. & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Roles of examples in how students learn to categorize statistic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 144-161.
     Riley, M. S., & Greeno, J. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and
     Instruction, 5,49-101.
     Reed, S. K. (1987). A stl1lcture-mapping model for word problems. Journal
     of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition, 13, 124- 139.
     Reed, S. K., Dempster, A., & Ettinger, M. (1985). Usefullness of analogous solution for solving algebrs word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and cognition, 11, 106-125.
     Reed, S. K., Willis, D., & GuaIino, J. (1994). Selecting examples for solving word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86,380-388.
     Reed, S. K. (1993). A schema-based theory of transfer. In D. K. Dettennan & R. 1. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: intelligence, cognition, and instruction (p.39-67). Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
     Reevs, L. M. (1994). Schema abstraction and conservative induction in analogical transfer (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University). Dissertation Abstracts Interactional.
     Robins, S. & Mayer, R. E. (1993). Schema training ill analogical reasouing.Jollrl1al of Educational Psychology, 85, 529-538.
     Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition., 13, 629-639.
     Ross, B. H. (1989a). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Defferent effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognitioll, 15, 456-468.
     Ross, B. H. (1989b). Remindings in leaming and instruction. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, (pp. 438-469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Ross, B. H., & Kennedy, P. T. (1990). Generalizing form the use of earlier examples in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 42-55.
     Rumelhalt, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. 1. Spiro, B. c., Bmce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawreuce Erlbaum Associates.
     Rllmelhatt, D. E. & Oltony, A. (1978). Accretion, tuning, and restructuring: Three modes of teaming. In 1. W. Gotton & R. Klatzkg (Eels.), Semantic Factors in Cognition, NJ: Erlbaum.
     Schomfeld, A. H. & Hernnann, D. 1. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychoology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 484-494.
     Simon, P. R. J. (1984). Instruction with analogies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 513-527.
     Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). If Saddam is Hitler then who is George Bush? Analogical mapping between systems of social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 913-933.
     Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L. & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, (pp. 498-528. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Spiro, R. J., Vispoel, W. L., Schmitz, 1. G., Samaraptmgavau, A. & Boerger, A. E. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Coguitive lecibility and transfer in complex content domains. In B. K. Britton & S. Glym (Eds.), Executive Control Process, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological
     Review, 84, 353-378.
     Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
     Sweller, J. (1989). Cognitive technology: some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving ill mathematics and science. Journal of
     Educational Psychology, 81, 457-466.
     Tarmizi, R. A. & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424-436.
     Tagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy in science. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
     Vosniadou, S. (1989). Analogical reasoning as a mechanism in knowledge acquisition: a developmental perspective. In S. Vosmadou & A. Ortony(Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, p413-422. CambIidge: Cambridge University Press.
     Vosniadou, S. & Oltony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogy reasoning: a synthesis. In S. Voslliadou & A. Oltony (Eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, p 1-15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Weaver, C. A. & Kintsch, W. (1992). Enhancing students` comprehensive of the conceptual structure of algebra word problems. Journal of Educational Psycho-logy, 84 (4), 419-428.
     Yang, Clm-Ling & Wedman, J. F. (1993). A study of tile conditions influencing analogical problem solving. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26 (4), 213-22l.
zh_TW