Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 投入程度、認知需求對廣告說服效果的影響-ELM模式之實證研究
INVOLVEMENT、NEED FOR COGNITION TO ADVERTISING EFFECTIVENESS
作者 白明勝
Pai, Ming Sheng
貢獻者 樓永堅
Lou, Yung Chien
白明勝
Pai, Ming Sheng
關鍵詞 推敲可能性模式
投入程度
認知需求
Elaboration Likelihood Model
Involvement
Need for Cognition
日期 1994
上傳時間 29-Apr-2016 09:14:57 (UTC+8)
摘要   ELM模式把過去紛歧的說服理論作一整合,成功地解釋了過去在說服理論及實證上的歧異。然而,不同的文化下有不同的溝通型態,ELM模式是否能放諸四海而皆準呢?本研究主要目的是希望了解ELM模式在文化迥異於美國的臺灣消費者是否依然成立呢?
  Systematic variation across cultures in many psychological phenomena have been found by many previous studies. This study incorporate on of them, i. e., need for cognition, into a consumer behavior model, i.e., the Elaboration Likelihood Model. In this paper, the reason why the development of an individual`s need for cognition is governed by cultures is explored and the relationship between need for cognition and persuasive effectiveness of media communication is established. Undergraduates at NCCU participated in the experiment. Subjects were randomly assigned to each of the cells in a 2(involvement:high or low) x 2(celebrity status:famous or infamous) x 2(argument quality: high or low)factorial design. Our study has not provided support for the view that different features of an advertisement may be more or less effective, depending upon a person`s involvement or need for cognition. The result is not consistent with that of other studies conducted in the western culture. The possible explanation may be due to the culture differences in that the Chinese culture is field dependent while the western culture is field independentas hypothesized.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易學系
82351024
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002003365
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 樓永堅zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Lou, Yung Chienen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 白明勝zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Pai, Ming Shengen_US
dc.creator (作者) 白明勝zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Pai, Ming Shengen_US
dc.date (日期) 1994en_US
dc.date.accessioned 29-Apr-2016 09:14:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 29-Apr-2016 09:14:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Apr-2016 09:14:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002003365en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/87840-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國際經營與貿易學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 82351024zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)   ELM模式把過去紛歧的說服理論作一整合,成功地解釋了過去在說服理論及實證上的歧異。然而,不同的文化下有不同的溝通型態,ELM模式是否能放諸四海而皆準呢?本研究主要目的是希望了解ELM模式在文化迥異於美國的臺灣消費者是否依然成立呢?zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)   Systematic variation across cultures in many psychological phenomena have been found by many previous studies. This study incorporate on of them, i. e., need for cognition, into a consumer behavior model, i.e., the Elaboration Likelihood Model. In this paper, the reason why the development of an individual`s need for cognition is governed by cultures is explored and the relationship between need for cognition and persuasive effectiveness of media communication is established. Undergraduates at NCCU participated in the experiment. Subjects were randomly assigned to each of the cells in a 2(involvement:high or low) x 2(celebrity status:famous or infamous) x 2(argument quality: high or low)factorial design. Our study has not provided support for the view that different features of an advertisement may be more or less effective, depending upon a person`s involvement or need for cognition. The result is not consistent with that of other studies conducted in the western culture. The possible explanation may be due to the culture differences in that the Chinese culture is field dependent while the western culture is field independentas hypothesized.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝詞
     中文摘要
     Abstract
     目錄-----I
     圖次-----III
     表次-----IV
     第一章 緒論-----1
       第一節 研究動機-----1
       第二節 研究目地-----3
       第三節 論文架構-----4
     第二章 文獻回顧-----5
       第一節 ELM模式提出之背景-----5
       第二節 ELM模式-----7
       第三節 投入程度與ELM-----20
       第四節 認知需求與ELM-----28
       第五節 國內有關ELM模式之實證研究-----31
     第三章 研究架構與研究方法-----35
       第一節 研究架構-----35
       第二節 研究假設-----36
       第三節 實驗設計-----38
       第四節 變數之操弄、衡量與問卷設計-----40
       第五節 資料分析的方法-----45
     第四章 研究結果-----47
       第一節 樣本結構-----47
       第二節 操弄之檢定-----48
       第三節 認知需求-----51
       第四節 論點回憶量-----53
       第五節 影響品牌態度的因素-----55
       第六節 影響構買意願的因素-----62
       第七節 產品回憶、品牌回憶及品牌辨認-----63
     第五章 結論與建議-----66
       第一節 研究結果、討論與建議-----66
       第二節 對後續研究之建議-----72
     參考文獻-----74
     附錄一 預試問卷-----85
     附錄二 問卷小冊子-----88
     附錄三 高、低投入程度組之抽獎卡-----95
     附錄四 廣告小冊子-----96
     
     圖次
     圖2-1 ELM模式-----13
     圖3-1 研究架構-----34
     圖4-1 投入程度與論點品質對態度之影響-----58
     圖4-2 投入程度與周邊線索對態度之影響-----59
     圖4-3 認知需求與論點品質對態度之影響-----60
     圖4-4 認知需求與周邊線索對態度之影響-----61
     
     表次
     表2-1 國內有關ELM模式之實證研究彙整-----33
     表4-1 有效樣本結構表-----47
     表4-2 各組選擇手提音響的人數及比例-----48
     表4-3 投入程度操弄檢定之變異數分析-----49
     表4-4 周邊線索操弄檢定之變異數分析-----50
     表4-5 論點品質操弄檢定之變異數分析-----50
     表4-6 高低認知需求之變異數分析-----51
     表4-7 高低認知需求的男女比例-----52
     表4-8 高低認知需求在高低投入程度上的比例-----52
     表4-9 高低認知需求在論點品質上的比例-----52
     表4-10 高低認知需求在周邊線索上的比例-----53
     表4-11 各組態度之均值與標準差-----55
     表4-12 投入程度對態度之影響-----56
     表4-13 周邊線索對態度之影響-----56
     表4-14 論點品質對態度之影響-----57
     表4-15 認知需求對態度之影響-----57
     表4-16 投入程度與論點品質對態度之影響-----58
     表4-17 投入程度與周邊現索對態度之影響-----59
     表4-18 認知需求與論點品質對態度之影響-----60
     表4-19 認知需求與周邊現索對態度之影響-----61
     表4-20 購買意願之變異數分析-----62
zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002003365en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 推敲可能性模式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 投入程度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 認知需求zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Elaboration Likelihood Modelen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Involvementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Need for Cognitionen_US
dc.title (題名) 投入程度、認知需求對廣告說服效果的影響-ELM模式之實證研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) INVOLVEMENT、NEED FOR COGNITION TO ADVERTISING EFFECTIVENESSen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US