Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124945
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor王信實<br>李文傑zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWang, Shinn-Shyr<br>Lee, Wen-Chiehen_US
dc.contributor.author倪湘倫zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorNi, Hsiang-Lunen_US
dc.creator倪湘倫zh_TW
dc.creatorNi, Hsiang-Lunen_US
dc.date2019en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-07T08:49:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-07T08:49:48Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-07T08:49:48Z-
dc.identifierG1062580301en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124945-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description經濟學系zh_TW
dc.description1062580301zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究以2007年至2012年台灣DRAM(動態隨機存取記憶體)產業中的廠商退出事件為研究背景,以2009年第一季奇夢達(Qimonda)破產為一劃分依據,分析後續廠商決策與台灣政策變化。使用資源配置模型探討三項議題,衡量奇夢達倒閉事件前後是否具有資源錯置的問題?政府是否可使用整併政策紓困DRAM產業困境?找出DRAM產業失敗的原因與時點以及未來發展策略。\n因此,完成以奇夢達倒閉事件前後的資源配置效率分析,與二項反事實假設,假設事件後廠商整併與倒閉事件未發生的案例分析。得出結論為DRAM市場中廠商退出會使資源配置效率降低,且投入扭曲程度受資金來源穩定度影響。另外,可藉由整併兩家市場上扭曲程度較大的廠商提升資源配置效率,並改善資本閒置與怠惰勞工的問題。而奇夢達倒閉事件對於當時的DRAM產業有利,而政府並未適當介入重新分配資源才致使後續廠商轉型與下市。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis research starts by investigating the degree of input misallocation prevalent in the DRAM industry. Based on the severe input misallocation problems observed in the Taiwanese DRAM industry the article proceeds with the dynamic market structure adjustment to fix the computed input distortions. Splitting the timeline following the Qimonda insolvency, two scenarios featured by first the firm exit and team-up mergers of incumbent firms exhibit divergent changes of equilibrium misallocations. That is realized that exit event would push up efficient frontiers to drag down overall industry-wide misallocation while merger scenarios bring up significant improvement of input distortions featuring by higher production efficiency.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 前言 1\n第一節 研究背景與動機 3\n第二章 文獻回顧 5\n第三章 台灣DRAM產業簡介 7\n第一節 產品特性 7\n第二節 產業結構 7\n第三節 產業特性 9\n第四節 台灣DRAM產業沿革 13\n第四章 資源配置模型 18\n第五章 資料敘述 23\n第一節 資料來源 23\n第二節 資料蒐集與說明 24\n第六章 奇夢達倒閉後資源錯置程度 28\n第一節 模型參數估計 28\n第二節 廠商倒閉後資源配置效率與扭曲程度 29\n第七章 反事實分析─廠商整併與未倒閉假設 32\n第一節 假設台灣廠商合併 32\n第二節 假設奇夢達並未倒閉 44\n第八章 結論與建議 47\n第一節 研究發現與結論 47\n第二節 未來研究建議 48\n參考文獻 49zh_TW
dc.format.extent1563076 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1062580301en_US
dc.subjectDRAM產業zh_TW
dc.subject資源錯置模型zh_TW
dc.subject反事實分析zh_TW
dc.subject廠商退出zh_TW
dc.subject廠商合併zh_TW
dc.title資源錯置模型探討DRAM產業廠商退出與反事實合併假設zh_TW
dc.titleThe study of Misallocation model of DRAM industry vendors in withdrawal and Counterfactual analysis of merger hypothesis.en_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference[1]Atkeson, A., Kehoe,P.,(2005).Modeling and measuring organization capital. J. Polit.Econ.113,1026–1053.\n[2]Banerjee A.V., and Esther Duflo,(2005).Growth Theory through the Lens of Development Economics, In: Handbook of Economic Growth, edited by Aghion and Durlauf,vol.1a,pp.473-552.\n[3]Basu,S.,(1996).Procyclical productivity: increasing returns or cyclical utilization? ,Q.J.Econ.111,719–751.\n[4]Basu,S.,Fernald,J.G.,(1995).Are apparent productive Spill overs a figment of specification error?, J. Monet.Econ.36,165–188.\n[5]Basu,S.,Kimball,M.S.,(1997).Cyclical Productivity with Unobserved Input Variation.WorkingPaperno.5915(February). National Bureau for Economic\nResearch, Cambridge, MA.\n[6]D. Restuccia, R. Rogerson,(2008). Policy Distortions and Aggregate Productivity with Heterogeneous Plants, Review of Economic Dynamics, vol 11(4),pp. 702-20.\n[7]David Hirshleifer, Po-Hsuan Hsu, Dongmei Li,(2013). Innovative efficiency and stock returns, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 107, Issue 3, pp. 632-654.\n[8]Electronics Research and Service Organization,(1999-2010).\nYearbook of Taiwan Semiconductor Industry. Industrial Technology Research Institute of Taiwan.\n[9]Hsieh C.T., Klenow P.J.,(2009).Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.124, pp.1403-1448.\n[10]Hall R.E., C.I. Jones,(1999).Why do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.114, pp.83-116\n[11]Klenow, P.J., Rodríguez -Clare, A.(1997).The neoclassical revival in growth economics: has it gone too far?, In: Bernanke, B., Rotemberg, J. (Eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 73–103.\n[12]Lee Wen-Chieh., Wang Shinn-Shyr.,(2017).Misallocations and policy constraints on mergers in the modern manufacturing sector. Journal of Macroeconomics\nVol 52, pp. 268-286.\n[13]Murillo, L.E.,(1993).The International Dynamic Random Access Memory Industry From 1970 to 1993 Examined Under the Dynamic Capabilities Prism:\nImplications for Technology Policy [Ph.D. Thesis]. University of California, Berkeley.\n[14]Ma, Daw. John Mark.(2003).The DRAM Market Structure: The Rise and Fall in Concentration. The 8th Annual Cambridge International Manufacturing Symposium. Cambridge, UK.\n[15]Parente, Stephen L.,Prescott, Edward C.,(1994). Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol.102(2), pp.298-321.\n[16]Parente, Stephen L., Prescott, Edward C.,(1999).Monopoly Rights: A Barrier to Riches, American Economic Review, vol.89, no.5.\n[17]PM. Gardete.2016, Competing Under Asymmetric Information: The Case of Dynamic Random Access Memory Manufacturing. Journal Management Science. Vol. 62 Issue 11, pp. 3291-3309.\n[18]Restuccia, D,,Rogerson,R.,(2013).Misallocation and productivity. Rev.Econ.Dyn.16,1–10.\n[19]Uras,R.B.,Wang,P.,(2016).Techniques Choice, Misallocation and Total Factor Productivity Discussion Paper 2014-074.Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg, Netherlands.zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/NCCU201900266en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
030101.pdf1.53 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.