學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 美國啟智學前教育計畫影響學生未來學校表現之研究
Project Head Start-how it influences future school performance?作者 蘇立瑋
Wei, Su Li貢獻者 張鈿富
Chang Dien Fu
蘇立瑋
Su Li Wei關鍵詞 啟智學前教育計畫
方案執行之標準
方案目標
學生學校表現
方案宗旨
Project Head Start
program performance standards
program goals
students`school performance日期 1993 上傳時間 29-Apr-2016 16:39:40 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究主要在探討美國啟智學前教育計畫與未來學校表現之間的關係。希 參考文獻 一、中文部份 林邦傑(民76)。整合分析的理論及其在國內的應用。教育與心理研究，第10期，頁1-38 林清山(民78)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華書局。 二、英文部份 Aaronson, M. et al. (1982). Preschool Preposition Test and Classroom Behavior. Description eighth grade follow-up of Head Start Program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association. Archer, M., & Edwareds, J. (1982). Predicting school achievement from data on pupils obtained from teachers: toward a screening device for disadvantage.Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(5), 761-770. Bernett, S. (1991). Benefits of compensatory preschool education. The Journal of Human Resources, 27(2), 279-312. Bentler, P., & Woodward, J.A. (1978). A Head start Reevaluation : positive effects are not yet demostratable. Evaluation Quarterly, 2(3), 493-510 Boercker, M. (1967). The Effect of an Eight-Week Head Start Program on Reading Achievement as Measured at the End of First Grade. Doctorial Disseration (unpublished), University of Kentucky. Butler, M. et al. (1985). Seven-year longitudinal study of the darly prediction of reading achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 349-361. Calhoun, J.A., & Collins, R.C. (1981) From one decade to another: a positive wiew of early childhood program. Theory Into Practice, 20(2), 135-140. Casto,G., & Mastropieri, M. (1986). The efficacy of early intervention programs: a meta analysis. Exceptional Children, 52(5), 417-424 Children Defense Fund (1991). The State of America’s Children, 1991. Washington,D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office. Colarusso, R. et al. (1980). Predicting first-gradeachievement through formal testing of 5-year-old high-risk children. The Journal of Special Education, 14 (3) , 355-363. Coleman, J., Campell, E., Hobson, C., Partland, J., Mood, A., Weinfield, F., & York, R. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington , D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office Crockett, B. et al. (1976). Relationship of WPPSI and subsequent Metropol itan Achievement Test scores in Head Start children. Psychology in the School, 1l(1), 19-20. Davis, B. C. (1989). A sucessful parent involvement program. Educational Leadership, 47(2), 21-23. Evans, E. (1985). Longitudinal follow-up assessment of differential preschool experience for low-income mInority group children. The Journal of Educational Research, 73 (3), 197-202. Federal Register (1990). Availability of FY 1990 Funds and Request for Appiication: Head Start Collaboration Projects 24838-24853. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office . Goodstein, H. A. , Cawley, R. R., & Burrows, M. J. (1975). The prediction of elementary school failure among high risk children. Storrs, CT: Connecticut University. Hatch, G., & Covin, T. (1977) . Comparability of WISC and Peabody IQs of young children frmlom three heterogeneous groups. Psychological Reports, 40, 1345-1346. Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. FL: Academic Press, Inc. Howell, K. et al. (1990). An empirical evaluation of three preschool language curricula. Psychology in the School, 27, 296-302. Hull, E. (1967). The interaction of intelligence and behavior as one predictor of early school achievement in working and culturally disadvantage Head Start children. U.S. Dept. of Health ,Education, and Welfare. Jencks, C. S.(1972). Inequality: a reassessment of the effects of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books. Krider, M., & Petsche, M. (1967). An evaluation of Head Start preschool enrichment programs as they affect the intellectual ability the social adjustment , and the achievement level of five-year-old children enrolied in Lincoln, Nebreska. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Larsen, J. (1972). Yes, Head Start improves reading, U.S Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Lazer, I .et al. (1977). Summary Report: The Persistence of Preschool Effect. A Long-Term Follow-Up of Fourteen Infant and Preschool Experiments, U.S. Department of Health , Education ,and Welfare. Lee, V., Brooks-Gunn, J., Schnur, E., & Liaw, F.R. (1990). Are Head Start effect sustained? Longitudinal follow-up comparison of disadvantaged children attending Head Start, no preschool, and other preschool programs. Child Development 61(2) , 495-507 Lee , V., Schnur, E., & Brook-Gunn, J. (1988). Does Head Start work? A 1-year follow-up comparison of disadvantaged children attending Head Start, no preschool, and other preschool program. Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 210-222. Levinston, P. et al. (1979). Summary Report: Lasting Effects After Preschool programs. Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 210-222. Levinston, P. et al. (1979). Summary Report: Lasting Effects After Preschool . U.S. Department of Health , Education ,and Welfare. Maggin, D. (1966). Will success spoil Operation Head Start? The Educational Digest, 7-9. McCormick, C. & Mason, J. (1986). Use of little books at home: a minimal intervention strategy that fosters early reading. Technical Repart No. 388. WA.: National Inst. Of Education. Mallory, N., & Goldsmith, N. (1990). Head Start Works! Two Head Start veterans share their views. Young Children ,45(6) , 36-39. McDonald, M. S., & Monroe, E. (undated). A follow-up study of the 1966 Head Start program. Unpublished manuscript, Rome , Georgia Public School. Moore, S. (1979). Past rearch and current perspectives on Head Start and Follow Through. Viewpoints in Teaching and Learning, 55(3), 75-82. Morrison, G. S. (1984). Early Childhood Education Today. Columbus, Ohio: Bell & Howell Company. Ravitch, D. (1981). The meaning of the new Coleman Report. Phi-Delta Kappan, 1(10), 718-720. Reynolds, A (1989). A structural model of first-grade outcomes for an urban, low socioeconomic status, minority population , Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 594-603. ------------- (1990). Sources of fading effects of Prekindergarten experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association. Smith, M., & Bissell, J. (1970). Report analysis: the impact of Head Start. Harvard Educational Review, 40(1), 51-104. Sprigle, J., & Schaefer, L. (1985). Longitudinal evaluation of the effects of two compensatory preschool programs on fourth through sixth grade students . Developmental Psychology, 21(4), 702-708. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1984). Head Start Program Proformance Standards, Washington, D. C.:U. S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services(1990).Head start Statistical Fact Sheet. Washington, D.C.” U. S. Government Printing Office. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (1991). Head Start Statistical Fact Sheet. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office. Van De Riet, V. & Van De Riet, H. (1967). An evaluation of An uniquesequential learning program on culturally deprived preschool chi ldren. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Washington, V. & Oyemade, U. J. (1986). How Head Start can respond to changing family trends. Education Digest, 26-29. Waxler, T., Thompson, N., & Poblete, P. (1990). Easing the transition from preschool to kindergarten. Children Today, 19(3), 28-30. Zigler, E. & Muenchow, S. (1992). Head Start: the inside story of America`s most successful educational experiment. New York: Basic Books. Zucker, S. & Copeland, E. (1988). K-ABC and McCarthy Scale performance among "at-risk" and normal preschoolers. Psychology in the School, 25, 5-10. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
G785229資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004178 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 張鈿富 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chang Dien Fu en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蘇立瑋 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Su Li Wei en_US dc.creator (作者) 蘇立瑋 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Wei, Su Li en_US dc.date (日期) 1993 en_US dc.date.accessioned 29-Apr-2016 16:39:40 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 29-Apr-2016 16:39:40 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Apr-2016 16:39:40 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002004178 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/88922 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 教育學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) G785229 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究主要在探討美國啟智學前教育計畫與未來學校表現之間的關係。希 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 第一節 研究動機. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 第二節 研究目的與問題. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 第三節 重要名詞詮釋. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 第二章 文獻探討. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 第一節 美國聯邦政府對貧困之界定. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 第二節 造成貧困之原因. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 第三節 啟智學前教育計畫起源. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 第四節 啟智學前教育計畫之教育目標與方針. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 第五節 啟智學前教育計畫之執行目標. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 第六節 啟智學前教育計畫與學校表現之相關研究. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 第三章 研究方法. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 第一節 方法與變項選取. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25 第二節 樣本特性. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 第三節 資料處理. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32 第四節 研究結果與討論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 第四章 研究結果與討論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 第一節 共同相關加權預估值與相關同質性之計算. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 第二節 同質相關之分析. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 第三節 異質相關之分析. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42 第四節 討論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 第五章 結論與建議. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55 第一節 結論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55 第二節 建議. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 參考書目. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004178 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 啟智學前教育計畫 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 方案執行之標準 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 方案目標 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學生學校表現 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 方案宗旨 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Project Head Start en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) program performance standards en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) program goals en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) students`school performance en_US dc.title (題名) 美國啟智學前教育計畫影響學生未來學校表現之研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Project Head Start-how it influences future school performance? en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部份 林邦傑(民76)。整合分析的理論及其在國內的應用。教育與心理研究，第10期，頁1-38 林清山(民78)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華書局。 二、英文部份 Aaronson, M. et al. (1982). Preschool Preposition Test and Classroom Behavior. Description eighth grade follow-up of Head Start Program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association. Archer, M., & Edwareds, J. (1982). Predicting school achievement from data on pupils obtained from teachers: toward a screening device for disadvantage.Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(5), 761-770. Bernett, S. (1991). Benefits of compensatory preschool education. The Journal of Human Resources, 27(2), 279-312. Bentler, P., & Woodward, J.A. (1978). A Head start Reevaluation : positive effects are not yet demostratable. Evaluation Quarterly, 2(3), 493-510 Boercker, M. (1967). The Effect of an Eight-Week Head Start Program on Reading Achievement as Measured at the End of First Grade. Doctorial Disseration (unpublished), University of Kentucky. Butler, M. et al. (1985). Seven-year longitudinal study of the darly prediction of reading achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 349-361. Calhoun, J.A., & Collins, R.C. (1981) From one decade to another: a positive wiew of early childhood program. Theory Into Practice, 20(2), 135-140. Casto,G., & Mastropieri, M. (1986). The efficacy of early intervention programs: a meta analysis. Exceptional Children, 52(5), 417-424 Children Defense Fund (1991). The State of America’s Children, 1991. Washington,D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office. Colarusso, R. et al. (1980). Predicting first-gradeachievement through formal testing of 5-year-old high-risk children. The Journal of Special Education, 14 (3) , 355-363. Coleman, J., Campell, E., Hobson, C., Partland, J., Mood, A., Weinfield, F., & York, R. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington , D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office Crockett, B. et al. (1976). Relationship of WPPSI and subsequent Metropol itan Achievement Test scores in Head Start children. Psychology in the School, 1l(1), 19-20. Davis, B. C. (1989). A sucessful parent involvement program. Educational Leadership, 47(2), 21-23. Evans, E. (1985). Longitudinal follow-up assessment of differential preschool experience for low-income mInority group children. The Journal of Educational Research, 73 (3), 197-202. Federal Register (1990). Availability of FY 1990 Funds and Request for Appiication: Head Start Collaboration Projects 24838-24853. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office . Goodstein, H. A. , Cawley, R. R., & Burrows, M. J. (1975). The prediction of elementary school failure among high risk children. Storrs, CT: Connecticut University. Hatch, G., & Covin, T. (1977) . Comparability of WISC and Peabody IQs of young children frmlom three heterogeneous groups. Psychological Reports, 40, 1345-1346. Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. FL: Academic Press, Inc. Howell, K. et al. (1990). An empirical evaluation of three preschool language curricula. Psychology in the School, 27, 296-302. Hull, E. (1967). The interaction of intelligence and behavior as one predictor of early school achievement in working and culturally disadvantage Head Start children. U.S. Dept. of Health ,Education, and Welfare. Jencks, C. S.(1972). Inequality: a reassessment of the effects of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books. Krider, M., & Petsche, M. (1967). An evaluation of Head Start preschool enrichment programs as they affect the intellectual ability the social adjustment , and the achievement level of five-year-old children enrolied in Lincoln, Nebreska. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Larsen, J. (1972). Yes, Head Start improves reading, U.S Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Lazer, I .et al. (1977). Summary Report: The Persistence of Preschool Effect. A Long-Term Follow-Up of Fourteen Infant and Preschool Experiments, U.S. Department of Health , Education ,and Welfare. Lee, V., Brooks-Gunn, J., Schnur, E., & Liaw, F.R. (1990). Are Head Start effect sustained? Longitudinal follow-up comparison of disadvantaged children attending Head Start, no preschool, and other preschool programs. Child Development 61(2) , 495-507 Lee , V., Schnur, E., & Brook-Gunn, J. (1988). Does Head Start work? A 1-year follow-up comparison of disadvantaged children attending Head Start, no preschool, and other preschool program. Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 210-222. Levinston, P. et al. (1979). Summary Report: Lasting Effects After Preschool programs. Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 210-222. Levinston, P. et al. (1979). Summary Report: Lasting Effects After Preschool . U.S. Department of Health , Education ,and Welfare. Maggin, D. (1966). Will success spoil Operation Head Start? The Educational Digest, 7-9. McCormick, C. & Mason, J. (1986). Use of little books at home: a minimal intervention strategy that fosters early reading. Technical Repart No. 388. WA.: National Inst. Of Education. Mallory, N., & Goldsmith, N. (1990). Head Start Works! Two Head Start veterans share their views. Young Children ,45(6) , 36-39. McDonald, M. S., & Monroe, E. (undated). A follow-up study of the 1966 Head Start program. Unpublished manuscript, Rome , Georgia Public School. Moore, S. (1979). Past rearch and current perspectives on Head Start and Follow Through. Viewpoints in Teaching and Learning, 55(3), 75-82. Morrison, G. S. (1984). Early Childhood Education Today. Columbus, Ohio: Bell & Howell Company. Ravitch, D. (1981). The meaning of the new Coleman Report. Phi-Delta Kappan, 1(10), 718-720. Reynolds, A (1989). A structural model of first-grade outcomes for an urban, low socioeconomic status, minority population , Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 594-603. ------------- (1990). Sources of fading effects of Prekindergarten experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association. Smith, M., & Bissell, J. (1970). Report analysis: the impact of Head Start. Harvard Educational Review, 40(1), 51-104. Sprigle, J., & Schaefer, L. (1985). Longitudinal evaluation of the effects of two compensatory preschool programs on fourth through sixth grade students . Developmental Psychology, 21(4), 702-708. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1984). Head Start Program Proformance Standards, Washington, D. C.:U. S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services(1990).Head start Statistical Fact Sheet. Washington, D.C.” U. S. Government Printing Office. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (1991). Head Start Statistical Fact Sheet. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office. Van De Riet, V. & Van De Riet, H. (1967). An evaluation of An uniquesequential learning program on culturally deprived preschool chi ldren. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Washington, V. & Oyemade, U. J. (1986). How Head Start can respond to changing family trends. Education Digest, 26-29. Waxler, T., Thompson, N., & Poblete, P. (1990). Easing the transition from preschool to kindergarten. Children Today, 19(3), 28-30. Zigler, E. & Muenchow, S. (1992). Head Start: the inside story of America`s most successful educational experiment. New York: Basic Books. Zucker, S. & Copeland, E. (1988). K-ABC and McCarthy Scale performance among "at-risk" and normal preschoolers. Psychology in the School, 25, 5-10. zh_TW
