1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Foreign Languages and Literature
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 大學生對線上英文補救課程之期待與學習經驗
EFL university students` expectations and learning experiences
作者 羅令媞
Luo, Ling Ti
貢獻者 招靜琪
Chao, Chin Chi
羅令媞
Luo, Ling Ti
關鍵詞 期待
英文補救教學課程
線上學習
Expectation
Remedial English course
Online learning
日期 2010
上傳時間 9-May-2016 14:39:54 (UTC+8)
摘要 在英文為第二語言和為外語的領域中，學習者的期待扮演著重要的角色，進而影響學習者對於新學習任務的觀感。隨著科技的演進，電腦輔助語言學習提供了英文學習者一個嶄新的學習環境，也影響了學習者的期待。然而，低英語學習成就者在線上英文補救課程的期待卻鮮少被探究。
      本研究目的為探討低英文學習成就者之期待與其對於線上學習之經驗與看法。本研究的參與者為三位英文低學習成就者。這三位參與者皆為大學一年級的女學生且參加學校提供的線上英文補救教學。本研究使用問卷、英文能力測驗和訪談來挑選適合的被研究者與收集資料。所得到的資訊將會以質性的方式分析並呈現參與研究者的期待、期待之轉變和對線上學習的經驗與看法。
      研究結果顯示出不同類型的自我期待影響學習者對線上學習的期待。擁有自我增值類型的自我期待之被研究者傾向於規範自己和期待英文能力進步；擁有自我貶抑類型的自我期待之被研究者傾向於對課程內容設計與同儕學習期待多一點；擁有適當自我評估類型的自我期待之被研究者對於自我學習管理良好且調整自己的學習狀態以適應新的線上學習環境，獲得更好的學習成效。此外，一些相關的議題也對被研究者有相當的影響，例如：面子、焦慮、自我效能、學習團體等。根據研究結果，有四項聲明可以被提出：第一，線上學習者對於面子相當在意；第二，不同自我期待之線上學習者對於焦慮有不同的處理方式；第三，對於線上學習來說，自主學習能力是很重要的。最後，並不是每一位線上學習者皆需要學習社群。
      總而言之，線上學習者的內在因素與外在的學習行為是密不可分的。被研究者的線上學習行為與經驗皆被其期待影響。在語言教育者著重於教室內的學習現象的同時，社會文化因素也是需要被納入考量的重要的議題。
In the field of ESL and EFL, learners’ expectations play a significant role and affect learners’ perception toward upcoming learning tasks. With the advance of technology, the computer assisted language learning provides English learners with alternative learning context, influencing the learners’ expectations. However, low achievers’ expectations in the online remedial English program are rarely investigated.
      The present study aimed at exploring the pattern of low achievers’ expectations and presenting the experience and perception of low achievers learning online. Participants were 3 English low achievers in a university. All of them were female freshmen and attended the online remedial English course offered by the university. Questionnaires, proficiency tests, and semi-structured interviews were administered to select participants and collect data. Later, the elicited information will be analyzed in a qualitative ways to display the expectations towards the online remedial English course, expectation shift, perceptions and experiences of online learning.
      The results showed that different types of the self-expectation influenced the learning expectations toward online learning. The participants with self-enhancement tended to regulate herself and expect to improve English proficiency more; the one with self-derogation inclined to expect course design and peer learning more; the one with appropriate self-appraisement regulated herself well and accustomed herself to the alternative online learning context for better learning results. Moreover, some issues played an important role to the three participants, including face, anxiety, self-efficacy, and a sense of learning community. Based on the results of this study, four assertions were proposed. First, face issues were of high concerns of these online learners. Second, learners with different types of self-expectation may treat anxiety in diverse ways. Third, self-regulatory efficacy was important to online learning. Finally, developing a learning community might not be welcomed by all the online learners.
      To sum up, online learners’ internal factors and external learning behavior were interwoven. The online experiences and performances of the three participants were affected by their expectations. As language educators focus on the learning phenomena in the classroom, the socio-cultural factors are other significant issues needed to be taken into consideration.
參考文獻 Anderson, T. & Elloumi, F. (2004). Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca University.
     Arbaugh, J.B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affects student satisfaction and leaning in Web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 42-54.
     Atan, H., Rahman, Z. A. & Idrus, R. M. (2004). Characteristics of the web-based learning environments in distance education: Students’perceptions of their learning needs, Educational Media International (UK), 41(2), 103-110.
     Ausubel, D. A. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
     Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
     Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
     Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thoughts and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
     Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
     Becker, A. H., Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A, & Neal, L. (1990). Student Expectations of Course and Instructor. Teaching of Psychology, 17(3), 159-162.
     Benz, C.R., Bradley, L., Alderman, M. K., & Flowers, M. A. (1992). Personal teaching efficacy: Developmental relationships in education. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(5), 274-285.
     Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 370-439.
     Brinkerhoff, J. & Koroghlanian, C. M. (2007). Online students’ expectations: Enhancing the fit between online students and course design. Education Computing Research, 36(4), 383-393.
     Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis, & J. W. Berry (Eds.).Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Methodology, 2, 389-444. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
     Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th Ed). NY: Longman.
     Burton, J.K., Merrill, P. F. (1991). Needs assessment: Goals, needs, and priorities. In L. J. Briggs, K. L. Gustafson , & M. H Tillman. (Eds.), Instructional design: Principles and applications (2nd ed., pp. 17-43). Educational Technology Publications.
     Chao, C. C. (招靜琪) (2004). CALL – The Taiwanese Experience. Essential Teacher. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
     Cole, M. S., Field, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2004). Student learning motivation and psychological hardiness: Interactive effects on students’ reactions to a management class. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(1), 64-85.
     Dabbagh, N. (2003). Scaffolding: A important teacher competency in online learning. TechTrends, 47(2), 39-44.
     Daley, C. E., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Bailey, P. (1999). The role of expectations in foreign language learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association.
     DesBrisay, M. (1984). Who knows best? A comparison of two placement procedures. Institut des Language Vivants Journal, 29, 162-165.
     Eastmond, D. (2000). Enabling student accomplishment online: An overview of factors for success in Web-based distance education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 343-358.
     Ferguson, N. (1978). Self-assessment of listening comprehension. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Learning, 16, 149-156.
     Friske, S., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
     Frey, A., Faul, A., & Yankelov, P. (2003). Student perceptions of Web-assisted teaching strategies. Journal of Social Work Education, 39(3), 443-457.
     Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
     Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn’t effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 57-72.
     Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books, New York.
     Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M., Hodgson, V., & Steeples, C. (2005). Networked learning in high education: students’ expectations and experiences. Higher Education, 50, 473-508.
     Goodwin, B. N., Miklich, B. A. & Overall, J. U. (1993). Perceptions and attitudes of faculty and students in two distance learning modes of delivery: Online computer and telecourse. Orlando: FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 371 708)
     Gaskill, P. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2002). Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning: The dynamic duo in school performance. In J. Aronson (Ed.) Improving Academic Achievement: Impact of Psychological Factors on Education, 186-206. NY: Academic Press.
     Holec, H. (1988). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Horwitz, E. K. (1990). Attending to the affective domain in the foreign language classroom. In Magnan, S. S. (Ed.). Shifting the instructional focus to the learner, 15-33. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference of Foreign Language Teachers.
     Jiao, Q. G., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2002). Anxiety-Expectation Mediation Model of Library Anxiety. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Chattanooga, TN.
     Johnson, C. F. (1996). Distance education: Factors that affect implementation in secondary schools. An unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
     Keegan, D. (1990). Foundations of distance education (2nd edition). New York: Loutledge.
     Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigelruth (Ed.) Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     Krashen, D. (1980). The input hypothesis. In Alatis, J. E. (Ed.). Current Issues in Bilingual Education: Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics, 168-180. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
     Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action-control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol.13, pp. 99-171). New York: Academic Press.
     Leblanc, R., & Painchaud, G. (1985). Self-assessment as a second-language placement instrument. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 673-686.
     MacIntyre, P. D., Noels, K. A., & Clement, R. (1997). Biases in self-ratings of second language proficiency: The role of language anxiety. Language Learning, 47(2), 265-287.
     Martens, R., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). New learning design in distance education: the impact on student perception and motivation. Distance Education, 28(1), 81-93.
     McCombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academy achievement: A phenomenological view. In Zimmerman, B. J. & D. H. Shunk (Eds). Self-regulated and academy achievement: Theory, research, and practice, (pp. 51-82). New York: Springer.
     McDonald, A. (2001). The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology, 21, 89-101.
     McKeachie, W. J. (2002). MeKeachie`s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (11th Ed.). Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Company.
     Moore, M.G. (1983). The individual adult learner. In M. Tight (ed.) Adult Learning and Education, 153-168. London: Croom Helm.
     Mupinga, D. M., Nora, R. T., & Yaw, D. C. (2006). The learning Style, expectations, and needs of online students. Coll Teach, 54(1), 185-189.
     Norem, J. K., & Cantor, N. (1986). Defensive perssimism: Harnessing anxiety as motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1208-1217.
     Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Bailey, P.,& Daley, C. E. (2002). The role of foreign language anxiety and students’ expectation in foreign language learning. Research in the Schools, 9, 33-50.
     Oscarson, M. (1984). Self-assessment of foreign language skills: A survey of research and development work. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
     Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Self and self-belief in psychology and education: A historical perspective. Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education, 3-21. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
     Rumble, G. (1986). The planning and management of distance education. Croom Helm.
     Richardson, C. J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-84.
     Ryan, S. (2001). Is online learning right for you? American Agent & Broker, 73(6), 54-58.
     Saba, F., & Shearer R. L. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education 8 (1), 37-57.
     Saba, F. (2005). Critical issues in distance education: A report from the United States. Distance Education. 26(2), 255-272.
     Sandercock, G.., & Shaw, G. (2003). Learners’ performance and evaluation of attitude towards web course tools in the delivery of an applied sports science module. Journal of Asynchronous Learning, 3(2), 1-10.
     Schramm, R. M., Wagner, R. J, & Werner, J. M. (2000). Student perceptions of the effectiveness of web-based courses. Distance Education Report, 3(18), 1-3.
     Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologists, 26, 207-231.
     Scovel, T. (1978). The effect of affect on foreign language learning: A review of anxiety research. Language Learning, 28, 129-142.
     Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London: Continuum.
     Spiceland, J. D., & Hawkins, P. C. (2002). The impact on learning of an asynchronous active learning course format. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 68-75.
     Stringer, S. B., & Thompson, J. S. (1998). Evaluating for distance learning: Feedback from students and faculty (pp.2-7). ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED422879.
     Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Peltz, W., & Maher, G. (2000). Building knowledge communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 389-413.
     Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
     Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994). Positive illusion and well-being revised: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21-27.
     Thompson, M. M. & Irele M.E. (2003). Evaluating distance education programs. In G.M. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education. (pp. 567-584). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     Thompson, M. M. (2007). From distance education to E-learning. In A. Andrews, & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of E-learning Research, 159-201. Sage Pubilcation.
     Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     Waschull, S. B. (2001). The online delivery of psychology courses: Attrition, performance and evaluation. Teaching of Psychology, 27(1), 28-33.
     Wenger, S., Hollyway, K. C., & Carton, E. M. (1990). The effect of internet-based instruction on student learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 3(2), 1-9.
     White, C. (1999). Expectations and emergent beliefs of self-instructed language learners. System, 27, 443-457.
     Williams, M. & Bruden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teacher: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Yaghoubi, J., Malek Mohammadi, I., Iravani, H., Attaran, M. & Gheidi, A. (2008). Virtual students` perceptions of e-learning in Iran. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(3), Article 10.
     Yang, M. N. (2006). Taiwanese Five-year Junior College EFL Students’ Beliefs. An unpublished doctoral dissertation. National Chengchi University.
     Yang, N. D. （楊乃冬）(1992). Second language learners` beliefs about language learning and their use of learning strategies: A study of college students of English in Taiwan. An unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.
     Yang, N, D. （楊乃冬）(1999). The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27, 515-535.
     Yeh, C. Y. (葉潔宇) (2005). On-line grammar and writing remedial course (大一英文線上補救教學), 發表於「大學英文線上教學 (招靜琪主持), 大一英文教學研討會」, 台北市, 台灣。
     Yli-Renko, K. (1988). Assessing foreign language training needs of adults: A case study from Finland. Helsinki: Helsinki University, Department of Education.
     Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key sub-processes? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 307-313.
     Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated leaning and academy achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Shunk. (Eds). Self-regulated and academy achievement: Theory, research, and practice, 1-25. New York: Springer.
     Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
95551021
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095551021
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 招靜琪zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chao, Chin Chien_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 羅令媞zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Luo, Ling Tien_US
dc.creator (作者) 羅令媞zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Luo, Ling Tien_US
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-May-2016 14:39:54 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-May-2016 14:39:54 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-May-2016 14:39:54 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0095551021en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95003-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95551021zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在英文為第二語言和為外語的領域中，學習者的期待扮演著重要的角色，進而影響學習者對於新學習任務的觀感。隨著科技的演進，電腦輔助語言學習提供了英文學習者一個嶄新的學習環境，也影響了學習者的期待。然而，低英語學習成就者在線上英文補救課程的期待卻鮮少被探究。
      本研究目的為探討低英文學習成就者之期待與其對於線上學習之經驗與看法。本研究的參與者為三位英文低學習成就者。這三位參與者皆為大學一年級的女學生且參加學校提供的線上英文補救教學。本研究使用問卷、英文能力測驗和訪談來挑選適合的被研究者與收集資料。所得到的資訊將會以質性的方式分析並呈現參與研究者的期待、期待之轉變和對線上學習的經驗與看法。
      研究結果顯示出不同類型的自我期待影響學習者對線上學習的期待。擁有自我增值類型的自我期待之被研究者傾向於規範自己和期待英文能力進步；擁有自我貶抑類型的自我期待之被研究者傾向於對課程內容設計與同儕學習期待多一點；擁有適當自我評估類型的自我期待之被研究者對於自我學習管理良好且調整自己的學習狀態以適應新的線上學習環境，獲得更好的學習成效。此外，一些相關的議題也對被研究者有相當的影響，例如：面子、焦慮、自我效能、學習團體等。根據研究結果，有四項聲明可以被提出：第一，線上學習者對於面子相當在意；第二，不同自我期待之線上學習者對於焦慮有不同的處理方式；第三，對於線上學習來說，自主學習能力是很重要的。最後，並不是每一位線上學習者皆需要學習社群。
      總而言之，線上學習者的內在因素與外在的學習行為是密不可分的。被研究者的線上學習行為與經驗皆被其期待影響。在語言教育者著重於教室內的學習現象的同時，社會文化因素也是需要被納入考量的重要的議題。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In the field of ESL and EFL, learners’ expectations play a significant role and affect learners’ perception toward upcoming learning tasks. With the advance of technology, the computer assisted language learning provides English learners with alternative learning context, influencing the learners’ expectations. However, low achievers’ expectations in the online remedial English program are rarely investigated.
      The present study aimed at exploring the pattern of low achievers’ expectations and presenting the experience and perception of low achievers learning online. Participants were 3 English low achievers in a university. All of them were female freshmen and attended the online remedial English course offered by the university. Questionnaires, proficiency tests, and semi-structured interviews were administered to select participants and collect data. Later, the elicited information will be analyzed in a qualitative ways to display the expectations towards the online remedial English course, expectation shift, perceptions and experiences of online learning.
      The results showed that different types of the self-expectation influenced the learning expectations toward online learning. The participants with self-enhancement tended to regulate herself and expect to improve English proficiency more; the one with self-derogation inclined to expect course design and peer learning more; the one with appropriate self-appraisement regulated herself well and accustomed herself to the alternative online learning context for better learning results. Moreover, some issues played an important role to the three participants, including face, anxiety, self-efficacy, and a sense of learning community. Based on the results of this study, four assertions were proposed. First, face issues were of high concerns of these online learners. Second, learners with different types of self-expectation may treat anxiety in diverse ways. Third, self-regulatory efficacy was important to online learning. Finally, developing a learning community might not be welcomed by all the online learners.
      To sum up, online learners’ internal factors and external learning behavior were interwoven. The online experiences and performances of the three participants were affected by their expectations. As language educators focus on the learning phenomena in the classroom, the socio-cultural factors are other significant issues needed to be taken into consideration.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Dedication Page......................................iii
     Acknowledgement......................................iv
     Chinese Abstract.....................................xi
     English Abstract.....................................xiii
     Chapter
      1. Introduction....................................1
      Background.....................................1
      Purpose of the Study...........................2
      Definition of Expectations.....................3
      Research Questions.............................4
      Significance of the Study......................4
      2. Literature Review...............................6
      Distance Education to E-learning:
      Student Perceptions............................6
      Motivation in Language Learning................11
      Self-regulated Learning........................13
      Self-efficacy and Learning Achievement.........16
      Self-expectation in the ESL/EFL Context........17
      Anxiety-Expectation Mediation (AEM) Model......20
      Expectation in the Online Learning Context.....21
      3. Methodology.....................................24
      Context........................................24
      Participants...................................25
      Materials in the Online Remedial English Course27
      Instruments....................................30
      The Online Learning Expectation Questionnaire..31
      The Online Learning Experience Questionnaire...32
      The English Proficiency Test...................32
      Semi-structured Interviews.....................33
      Data Collection Procedure......................34
      Data Analysis..................................36
      Learning from the Pilot Test...................37
      4. Presenting the Three Cases......................38
      Voice of A Self-enhancement Student: Jane’s Case38
      Background....................................38
      Self-perception and Attitude..................40
      Jane and Anxiety..............................42
      Jane in the Online Remedial English Course....43
      Voice of An Appropriate Self-appraisement Student:
      Kate’s Case...................................55
      Background....................................55
      Self-perception and Attitude..................56
      Kate and Anxiety..............................57
      Kate in the Online Remedial English Course....58
      Voice of A Self-derogation Student: Eva’s Case.69
      Background....................................69
      Self-perception and Attitude..................69
      Eva and Anxiety...............................71
      Eva in the Online Remedial English Course.....73
      5. Cross Case Discussion...........................84
      Similarities and Differences of the Three
      Participants in the Online Remedial English
      Course.........................................84
      Expectations..................................84
      Changes of Expectations.......................85
      Perceptions and Learning Experiences..........88
      Issues for Cross Case Discussion...............90
      Face..........................................90
      Anxiety.......................................92
      Self-efficacy.................................95
      A Sense of Learning Community.................97
      6. Conclusion......................................99
      Summary of the Present Study...................99
      Pedagogical Implication........................101
      Limitation and Further Research................102
      Conclusion.....................................103
     References...........................................104
     Appendixes...........................................112
      A. The Online Learning Expectation Questionnaire...112
      B. The Online Learning Experience Questionnaire....116
      C. The Questions for the Semi-structured Interviews
      (Chinese version)...............................118
      D. The Questions for the Semi-structured Interviews
      (English version)...............................120		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095551021en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 期待zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 英文補救教學課程zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 線上學習zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Expectationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Remedial English courseen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Online learningen_US
dc.title (題名) 大學生對線上英文補救課程之期待與學習經驗zh_TW
dc.title (題名) EFL university students` expectations and learning experiencesen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, T. & Elloumi, F. (2004). Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca University.
     Arbaugh, J.B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affects student satisfaction and leaning in Web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 42-54.
     Atan, H., Rahman, Z. A. & Idrus, R. M. (2004). Characteristics of the web-based learning environments in distance education: Students’perceptions of their learning needs, Educational Media International (UK), 41(2), 103-110.
     Ausubel, D. A. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
     Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
     Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
     Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thoughts and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
     Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
     Becker, A. H., Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A, & Neal, L. (1990). Student Expectations of Course and Instructor. Teaching of Psychology, 17(3), 159-162.
     Benz, C.R., Bradley, L., Alderman, M. K., & Flowers, M. A. (1992). Personal teaching efficacy: Developmental relationships in education. The Journal of Educational Research, 85(5), 274-285.
     Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 370-439.
     Brinkerhoff, J. & Koroghlanian, C. M. (2007). Online students’ expectations: Enhancing the fit between online students and course design. Education Computing Research, 36(4), 383-393.
     Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis, & J. W. Berry (Eds.).Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Methodology, 2, 389-444. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
     Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th Ed). NY: Longman.
     Burton, J.K., Merrill, P. F. (1991). Needs assessment: Goals, needs, and priorities. In L. J. Briggs, K. L. Gustafson , & M. H Tillman. (Eds.), Instructional design: Principles and applications (2nd ed., pp. 17-43). Educational Technology Publications.
     Chao, C. C. (招靜琪) (2004). CALL – The Taiwanese Experience. Essential Teacher. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
     Cole, M. S., Field, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2004). Student learning motivation and psychological hardiness: Interactive effects on students’ reactions to a management class. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(1), 64-85.
     Dabbagh, N. (2003). Scaffolding: A important teacher competency in online learning. TechTrends, 47(2), 39-44.
     Daley, C. E., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Bailey, P. (1999). The role of expectations in foreign language learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association.
     DesBrisay, M. (1984). Who knows best? A comparison of two placement procedures. Institut des Language Vivants Journal, 29, 162-165.
     Eastmond, D. (2000). Enabling student accomplishment online: An overview of factors for success in Web-based distance education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 343-358.
     Ferguson, N. (1978). Self-assessment of listening comprehension. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Learning, 16, 149-156.
     Friske, S., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
     Frey, A., Faul, A., & Yankelov, P. (2003). Student perceptions of Web-assisted teaching strategies. Journal of Social Work Education, 39(3), 443-457.
     Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
     Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn’t effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 57-72.
     Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books, New York.
     Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M., Hodgson, V., & Steeples, C. (2005). Networked learning in high education: students’ expectations and experiences. Higher Education, 50, 473-508.
     Goodwin, B. N., Miklich, B. A. & Overall, J. U. (1993). Perceptions and attitudes of faculty and students in two distance learning modes of delivery: Online computer and telecourse. Orlando: FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 371 708)
     Gaskill, P. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2002). Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning: The dynamic duo in school performance. In J. Aronson (Ed.) Improving Academic Achievement: Impact of Psychological Factors on Education, 186-206. NY: Academic Press.
     Holec, H. (1988). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Horwitz, E. K. (1990). Attending to the affective domain in the foreign language classroom. In Magnan, S. S. (Ed.). Shifting the instructional focus to the learner, 15-33. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference of Foreign Language Teachers.
     Jiao, Q. G., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2002). Anxiety-Expectation Mediation Model of Library Anxiety. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Chattanooga, TN.
     Johnson, C. F. (1996). Distance education: Factors that affect implementation in secondary schools. An unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
     Keegan, D. (1990). Foundations of distance education (2nd edition). New York: Loutledge.
     Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigelruth (Ed.) Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     Krashen, D. (1980). The input hypothesis. In Alatis, J. E. (Ed.). Current Issues in Bilingual Education: Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics, 168-180. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
     Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action-control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol.13, pp. 99-171). New York: Academic Press.
     Leblanc, R., & Painchaud, G. (1985). Self-assessment as a second-language placement instrument. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 673-686.
     MacIntyre, P. D., Noels, K. A., & Clement, R. (1997). Biases in self-ratings of second language proficiency: The role of language anxiety. Language Learning, 47(2), 265-287.
     Martens, R., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). New learning design in distance education: the impact on student perception and motivation. Distance Education, 28(1), 81-93.
     McCombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academy achievement: A phenomenological view. In Zimmerman, B. J. & D. H. Shunk (Eds). Self-regulated and academy achievement: Theory, research, and practice, (pp. 51-82). New York: Springer.
     McDonald, A. (2001). The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology, 21, 89-101.
     McKeachie, W. J. (2002). MeKeachie`s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (11th Ed.). Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Company.
     Moore, M.G. (1983). The individual adult learner. In M. Tight (ed.) Adult Learning and Education, 153-168. London: Croom Helm.
     Mupinga, D. M., Nora, R. T., & Yaw, D. C. (2006). The learning Style, expectations, and needs of online students. Coll Teach, 54(1), 185-189.
     Norem, J. K., & Cantor, N. (1986). Defensive perssimism: Harnessing anxiety as motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1208-1217.
     Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Bailey, P.,& Daley, C. E. (2002). The role of foreign language anxiety and students’ expectation in foreign language learning. Research in the Schools, 9, 33-50.
     Oscarson, M. (1984). Self-assessment of foreign language skills: A survey of research and development work. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
     Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Self and self-belief in psychology and education: A historical perspective. Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education, 3-21. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
     Rumble, G. (1986). The planning and management of distance education. Croom Helm.
     Richardson, C. J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-84.
     Ryan, S. (2001). Is online learning right for you? American Agent & Broker, 73(6), 54-58.
     Saba, F., & Shearer R. L. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education 8 (1), 37-57.
     Saba, F. (2005). Critical issues in distance education: A report from the United States. Distance Education. 26(2), 255-272.
     Sandercock, G.., & Shaw, G. (2003). Learners’ performance and evaluation of attitude towards web course tools in the delivery of an applied sports science module. Journal of Asynchronous Learning, 3(2), 1-10.
     Schramm, R. M., Wagner, R. J, & Werner, J. M. (2000). Student perceptions of the effectiveness of web-based courses. Distance Education Report, 3(18), 1-3.
     Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologists, 26, 207-231.
     Scovel, T. (1978). The effect of affect on foreign language learning: A review of anxiety research. Language Learning, 28, 129-142.
     Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London: Continuum.
     Spiceland, J. D., & Hawkins, P. C. (2002). The impact on learning of an asynchronous active learning course format. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 68-75.
     Stringer, S. B., & Thompson, J. S. (1998). Evaluating for distance learning: Feedback from students and faculty (pp.2-7). ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED422879.
     Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Peltz, W., & Maher, G. (2000). Building knowledge communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 389-413.
     Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
     Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994). Positive illusion and well-being revised: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21-27.
     Thompson, M. M. & Irele M.E. (2003). Evaluating distance education programs. In G.M. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education. (pp. 567-584). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     Thompson, M. M. (2007). From distance education to E-learning. In A. Andrews, & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of E-learning Research, 159-201. Sage Pubilcation.
     Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     Waschull, S. B. (2001). The online delivery of psychology courses: Attrition, performance and evaluation. Teaching of Psychology, 27(1), 28-33.
     Wenger, S., Hollyway, K. C., & Carton, E. M. (1990). The effect of internet-based instruction on student learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 3(2), 1-9.
     White, C. (1999). Expectations and emergent beliefs of self-instructed language learners. System, 27, 443-457.
     Williams, M. & Bruden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teacher: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Yaghoubi, J., Malek Mohammadi, I., Iravani, H., Attaran, M. & Gheidi, A. (2008). Virtual students` perceptions of e-learning in Iran. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(3), Article 10.
     Yang, M. N. (2006). Taiwanese Five-year Junior College EFL Students’ Beliefs. An unpublished doctoral dissertation. National Chengchi University.
     Yang, N. D. （楊乃冬）(1992). Second language learners` beliefs about language learning and their use of learning strategies: A study of college students of English in Taiwan. An unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.
     Yang, N, D. （楊乃冬）(1999). The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27, 515-535.
     Yeh, C. Y. (葉潔宇) (2005). On-line grammar and writing remedial course (大一英文線上補救教學), 發表於「大學英文線上教學 (招靜琪主持), 大一英文教學研討會」, 台北市, 台灣。
     Yli-Renko, K. (1988). Assessing foreign language training needs of adults: A case study from Finland. Helsinki: Helsinki University, Department of Education.
     Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Development of self-regulated learning: Which are the key sub-processes? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 307-313.
     Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated leaning and academy achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Shunk. (Eds). Self-regulated and academy achievement: Theory, research, and practice, 1-25. New York: Springer.
     Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17.		zh_TW