學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 Hannah Arendt政治思想的途徑
The Approach of Hannah Arendt`s political thinking作者 楊麗菁 貢獻者 葉浩
楊麗菁關鍵詞 政治哲學
政治理論
方法論
研究途徑
說故事
Hannah Arendt日期 2016 上傳時間 2-Sep-2016 01:03:32 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究希望以鄂蘭的政治思想的研究途徑作為討論的對象，試圖從方法論的角度循著鄂蘭自己的反思歷程，來釐清鄂蘭對政治理論的貢獻。首先在第二章中說明她在極權主義的研究中所產生的理解問題，以及鄂蘭如何對政治哲學傳統以及現代社會的科學化努力進行強烈地批判。第三章我們將看到鄂蘭對實踐生活的重新考察，藉由重新找回政治行動的意義與重要性，鄂蘭同時也發現了行動難以消解的困境，成為了新的政治思想亟需克服的重要問題。第四章則是聚焦「說故事」（storytelling）的討論上，將討論說故事的主要功能以及以說故事為政治思想途徑的一些問題。 參考文獻 一、 中文部份Canovan, Margaret2009 《阿倫特政治思想再釋》，陳高華譯。北京：人民出版社。Jahanbegloo, Ramin 1994 《以撒⋅柏林對話錄 : 思想的瀚海》，楊孝明譯。臺北市：正中。Marsh, David and Gerry Stoker2009 《政治學方法論與途徑》，陳義彥等譯。台北：韋伯。邱彥彬2010 〈反胃的社會主義？：論辛克萊《叢林》的生命政治〉，《英美文學評論》，第16期，頁155-185。郭秋永2009 〈改造運動：政治哲學與政治科學〉，《東吳政治學報》，27卷1期，頁1-64。陳思賢1999 《西洋政治思想史－古典世界篇》，臺北市，五南圖書。黃默、陳俊宏1997 〈政治哲學要跨出去！論台灣政治哲學研究的發展趨向〉，《東吳政治學報》，8期，頁1-45。蔡英文1997 〈兩種政治的概念：卡爾‧史密特與漢娜‧鄂蘭〉，《臺灣社會研究季刊》，27期，頁139-171。2002 《政治實踐與公共空間——漢娜‧鄂蘭的政治思想》，臺北：聯經出版公司。童涵浦2010 《從意識形態批判到有效性的建立：Hannah Arendt論「判斷」的政治意義》。台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。蕭高彥2006 〈共和主義、民族主義與憲政理論：鄂蘭與施密特的隱蔽對話〉，《政治科學論叢》，27輯，頁113-146。二、 英文部份Arendt, H. 1953 “[The Origins of Totalitarianism]: A Reply,” World Politic The review of politics. 15(1), 76-84.Anthony F. Lang, Jr. and John Williams2005 Hannah Arendt and International Relations: Reading Across the Lines , New York: Palgrave Press. Barker, Kye 2013 “Book Review: Hannah Arendt and Political Theory: Challenging Tradition by Steve Buckler,” LSE Review of Books. Available at http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2013/03/29/book-review-hannah-arendt-and-political-theory-challenging-tradition/Benhabib, Seyla1994 “Hannah Arendt and the Redemptive Power of Narrative,” in Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman eds., Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays. Albany: State University of New York Press.1996 The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Cooper, B., & Voegelin, E.1999 Eric Voegelin and the foundations of modern political science. University of Missouri Press. Dahl, Robert 1958 “Political Theory: Truth and Consequences,” World Politics 11: 89-102.Disch, Lisa Jane. 1993 “More Truth Than Fact: Storytelling As Critical Understanding In The Writings Of Hannah Arendt,” Political Theory 21 (4): 665-694. 1994 Hannah Arendt And The Limits Of Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Gunnell, J. G.1979 Political theory: Tradition and interpretation. Winthrop Publishers. Held, David1991 “Introduction,” in D. Held eds, Political Theory Today. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University PressKateb, George1983 Hannah Arendt: Politics, Conscience, Evil. Oxford: Martin Robertson.1999 “The Judgment of Arendt,” Revue-Internationale-de-Philosophie 53(208): 133-154.Kerry H. Whiteside1998 “Worldliness and Respect for Nature: an Ecological Appreciation of Hannah Arendt`s Conception of Culture,” Environmental Values 7: 25-40Kielmansegg, P., Mewes, H. and Glaser-Schmidt, E., eds.1997 Hannah Arendt and Leo Strauss: German Emigrés and American Political Thought after World War II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kirkpatrick, Evron1962 “The Impact of the Behavioral Approach on Traditional Political Science, ”, in Austin Ranny ed., Essays on theBehavioral Study of Politics. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, pp. 1-29.Laslett, Peter1956 “Introduction, ” Philosophy, Politics and Society (series1) Oxford: Blackwell: vii-xv.Luban, David1994 “Explaining Dark Times: Hannah Arendt’s Theory of Theory,” in Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman eds., Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays. Albany: State University of New York Press.Margaret Canovan1983 “Arendt, Rousseau, and Human Plurality in Politics,” The Journal of Politics 45(2) : 286-302Maria Tamboukou 2013 “Love, Narratives, Politics: Encounters between Hannah Arendt and Rosa Luxemburg,” Theory, Culture & Society 30: 35.Moon, J. Donald1982 “Interpretation, Theory, and Human Emancipation,” in Elinor Ostrom. eds., Strategies of Political Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, pp.149-178.Parekh, Bhikhu C. 1981 Hannah Arendt and the search for a new political philosophy. Springer. Simon Swift2009. Hannah Arendt. London: Routledge. S. Kierkeggard1944 Concluding Unscientific Postscript, W. Lowrie eds., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Speight, Allen 2011 “Arendt on Narrative Theory and Practice,” College Literature 38(1): 115-130.Steve Buckler2012 Hannah Arendt and Political Theory: Challenging Tradition. Edinburgh University Press. Topolski, A 2015 Arendt, Levinas and a Politics of Relationality. Rowman & Littlefield International. Voegelin, Eric1953 “The Origins of Totalitarianism,” Review of Politics. 15(1), 68-76 Vollrath, Ernst1977 “Hannah Arendt and the Method of Political Thinking,” Hans Fentel Trans. Social Research. 44(1):160-182Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth1982 Hannah Arendt: For Love of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1977 “Hannah Arendt`s Storytelling,” Social Research 44(1): 183-190 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
政治學系
99252021資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099252021 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 葉浩 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 楊麗菁 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 楊麗菁 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2016 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Sep-2016 01:03:32 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Sep-2016 01:03:32 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Sep-2016 01:03:32 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0099252021 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101180 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 政治學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 99252021 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究希望以鄂蘭的政治思想的研究途徑作為討論的對象，試圖從方法論的角度循著鄂蘭自己的反思歷程，來釐清鄂蘭對政治理論的貢獻。首先在第二章中說明她在極權主義的研究中所產生的理解問題，以及鄂蘭如何對政治哲學傳統以及現代社會的科學化努力進行強烈地批判。第三章我們將看到鄂蘭對實踐生活的重新考察，藉由重新找回政治行動的意義與重要性，鄂蘭同時也發現了行動難以消解的困境，成為了新的政治思想亟需克服的重要問題。第四章則是聚焦「說故事」（storytelling）的討論上，將討論說故事的主要功能以及以說故事為政治思想途徑的一些問題。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 問題意識 1第二節 文獻檢閱 5第三節 章節安排 8第二章 理解危機 10第一節 《極權主義的起源》中產生的「理解問題」 10壹、 理解的問題 10參、 鄂蘭的回應 17第二節 鄂蘭對政治哲學傳統的批判 21壹、 從柏拉圖到馬克思 21一、傳統的開端：柏拉圖 21二、傳統的終結：馬克思 24三、對「傳統觀」的質疑 26貳、 二分世界的理論 28參、 傳統斷裂的危機與轉機 30第三節 過程概念與去事實化的方法 32壹、 歷史哲學的問題 32一、古代的歷史觀念 32二、近代歷史的過程概念 36貳、 社會科學的問題 39一、類比與化約 40二、功能主義 41三、「客觀」的方法論原則 42第三章 重新考察「行動生活」 45第一節 亞里斯多德的「政治生活」 46第二節 鄂蘭的「行動生活」 49壹、 人的「條件」 49貳、 三種活動 52參、 行動與複數性 55第四章 鄂蘭政治思想的途徑 60第一節 說故事 60壹、 理解過去 60貳、 重建世界 65第二節 不說故事 67一、隱喻 71二、「引文」的破壞性保存。 71三、採珠人 73 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2044378 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099252021 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政治哲學 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政治理論 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 方法論 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研究途徑 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 說故事 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Hannah Arendt en_US dc.title (題名) Hannah Arendt政治思想的途徑 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Approach of Hannah Arendt`s political thinking en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文部份Canovan, Margaret2009 《阿倫特政治思想再釋》，陳高華譯。北京：人民出版社。Jahanbegloo, Ramin 1994 《以撒⋅柏林對話錄 : 思想的瀚海》，楊孝明譯。臺北市：正中。Marsh, David and Gerry Stoker2009 《政治學方法論與途徑》，陳義彥等譯。台北：韋伯。邱彥彬2010 〈反胃的社會主義？：論辛克萊《叢林》的生命政治〉，《英美文學評論》，第16期，頁155-185。郭秋永2009 〈改造運動：政治哲學與政治科學〉，《東吳政治學報》，27卷1期，頁1-64。陳思賢1999 《西洋政治思想史－古典世界篇》，臺北市，五南圖書。黃默、陳俊宏1997 〈政治哲學要跨出去！論台灣政治哲學研究的發展趨向〉，《東吳政治學報》，8期，頁1-45。蔡英文1997 〈兩種政治的概念：卡爾‧史密特與漢娜‧鄂蘭〉，《臺灣社會研究季刊》，27期，頁139-171。2002 《政治實踐與公共空間——漢娜‧鄂蘭的政治思想》，臺北：聯經出版公司。童涵浦2010 《從意識形態批判到有效性的建立：Hannah Arendt論「判斷」的政治意義》。台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。蕭高彥2006 〈共和主義、民族主義與憲政理論：鄂蘭與施密特的隱蔽對話〉，《政治科學論叢》，27輯，頁113-146。二、 英文部份Arendt, H. 1953 “[The Origins of Totalitarianism]: A Reply,” World Politic The review of politics. 15(1), 76-84.Anthony F. Lang, Jr. and John Williams2005 Hannah Arendt and International Relations: Reading Across the Lines , New York: Palgrave Press. Barker, Kye 2013 “Book Review: Hannah Arendt and Political Theory: Challenging Tradition by Steve Buckler,” LSE Review of Books. Available at http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2013/03/29/book-review-hannah-arendt-and-political-theory-challenging-tradition/Benhabib, Seyla1994 “Hannah Arendt and the Redemptive Power of Narrative,” in Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman eds., Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays. Albany: State University of New York Press.1996 The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Cooper, B., & Voegelin, E.1999 Eric Voegelin and the foundations of modern political science. University of Missouri Press. Dahl, Robert 1958 “Political Theory: Truth and Consequences,” World Politics 11: 89-102.Disch, Lisa Jane. 1993 “More Truth Than Fact: Storytelling As Critical Understanding In The Writings Of Hannah Arendt,” Political Theory 21 (4): 665-694. 1994 Hannah Arendt And The Limits Of Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Gunnell, J. G.1979 Political theory: Tradition and interpretation. Winthrop Publishers. Held, David1991 “Introduction,” in D. Held eds, Political Theory Today. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University PressKateb, George1983 Hannah Arendt: Politics, Conscience, Evil. Oxford: Martin Robertson.1999 “The Judgment of Arendt,” Revue-Internationale-de-Philosophie 53(208): 133-154.Kerry H. Whiteside1998 “Worldliness and Respect for Nature: an Ecological Appreciation of Hannah Arendt`s Conception of Culture,” Environmental Values 7: 25-40Kielmansegg, P., Mewes, H. and Glaser-Schmidt, E., eds.1997 Hannah Arendt and Leo Strauss: German Emigrés and American Political Thought after World War II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kirkpatrick, Evron1962 “The Impact of the Behavioral Approach on Traditional Political Science, ”, in Austin Ranny ed., Essays on theBehavioral Study of Politics. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, pp. 1-29.Laslett, Peter1956 “Introduction, ” Philosophy, Politics and Society (series1) Oxford: Blackwell: vii-xv.Luban, David1994 “Explaining Dark Times: Hannah Arendt’s Theory of Theory,” in Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman eds., Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays. Albany: State University of New York Press.Margaret Canovan1983 “Arendt, Rousseau, and Human Plurality in Politics,” The Journal of Politics 45(2) : 286-302Maria Tamboukou 2013 “Love, Narratives, Politics: Encounters between Hannah Arendt and Rosa Luxemburg,” Theory, Culture & Society 30: 35.Moon, J. Donald1982 “Interpretation, Theory, and Human Emancipation,” in Elinor Ostrom. eds., Strategies of Political Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, pp.149-178.Parekh, Bhikhu C. 1981 Hannah Arendt and the search for a new political philosophy. Springer. Simon Swift2009. Hannah Arendt. London: Routledge. S. Kierkeggard1944 Concluding Unscientific Postscript, W. Lowrie eds., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Speight, Allen 2011 “Arendt on Narrative Theory and Practice,” College Literature 38(1): 115-130.Steve Buckler2012 Hannah Arendt and Political Theory: Challenging Tradition. Edinburgh University Press. Topolski, A 2015 Arendt, Levinas and a Politics of Relationality. Rowman & Littlefield International. Voegelin, Eric1953 “The Origins of Totalitarianism,” Review of Politics. 15(1), 68-76 Vollrath, Ernst1977 “Hannah Arendt and the Method of Political Thinking,” Hans Fentel Trans. Social Research. 44(1):160-182Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth1982 Hannah Arendt: For Love of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1977 “Hannah Arendt`s Storytelling,” Social Research 44(1): 183-190 zh_TW
