學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 論瑪格麗特‧愛特伍《瘋狂亞當三部曲》中新自由主義治理論述，裸命，生命-形式及無身份
Neo-liberal governmentality：bare life, form-of-life and (non)-identity in Margaret Atwood`s MaddAddam trilogy作者 鄧安廷
Teng, An-Ting貢獻者 邱彥彬
Chiou, Yen-Bin
鄧安廷
Teng, An-Ting關鍵詞 <<瘋狂亞當三部曲>>
瑪格麗特.愛特伍
新自由主義
治理性
裸命
生命-形式
無身份
MaddAddam trilogy
Margaret Atwood
Neoliberalism
Governmentality
Bare life
Form-of-life
(Non)-identity日期 2017 上傳時間 1-Mar-2017 17:00:00 (UTC+8) 摘要 瑪格麗特‧愛特伍的《瘋狂亞當三部曲》描繪了當代讀者所熟悉的世界: 一個受新自由主義浪潮席捲的社會。當政府權力被龐大財團架空，自由國家的民主核心價值早已崩解。 本篇論文的論點延伸自Chris Vials 的文章，並試圖以新自由主義統治論述來解釋小說中民主與極權融為一體的情況。第一章解釋新經濟思維使個人與社會產生疏離，以統治極端分化的社會階層。第二章則闡述小說中的國家已陷入例外狀態，法律受到懸置，而圍牆的設立強化了排除生命的機制並且產生 “裸命”。在最後的章節將探討上帝的園丁會 “生命-形式” 的革命以及《瘋狂亞當》的主角澤伯所展現的 “無身份” 抵抗的可能性。 如同書中角色，身處於當代的讀者正受到這股 “未來的浪潮” 推進向前卻同時又受到過去的夢靨所困。世界大戰、猶太人集中營不只是已過去的歷史事實，他們以不同形式再現且縈繞不去。如何撿拾過去的傷痛與錯誤，承接死去之人的意志正是我們必須肩負的責任。
In Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy, the author imagines a near future that is too familiar for the reader who live in the contemporary period, a neoliberal society. Through the depiction of a hollowed-out nation replaced by a giant consortium, she lays bare a truth that democracy is going to collapse. Based on Chris Vials’ article, “Margaret Atwood’s Dystopic Fiction and the Contradictions of Neoliberal Freedom,” this thesis furthers to elaborate the integration of democratic regime and totalitarianism by discourse of neoliberal governance: the neoliberal rationality alienates individuals, uniting the divided social stratifications. In the second part, I suggest that the nation falls into an anarchy since it has already entered into a state of exception, which gives rise to “bare life.” The exclusion mechanism is represented by the construction of “the Walls.” The third chapter aims to discuss the possibility of resisting the new form of sovereign power in practice of the God’s Gardeners about how to live “form-of-life” and politics of “(non)-identity” deployed by Zeb, the protagonist of MaddAddam. Like the characters, we stand in the intersection of the “Wave of future” and the recurring nightmare in the past. Global wars and concentration camp are not only historical facts but recurring events. It is our responsibility to recall the memory, remember the pain, and inherit the will of the dead.參考文獻 Agamben, Giorgio. Means without End: Notes on Politics. Trans. Vincenzo Binettiand Cesare Casarino. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2000. Print. ---. The Coming Community. Trans. Michael Hardt. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P,1993. Print. ---. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: U of Stanford P, 1998. Print. ---. State of Exception. Trans. Kevin Attell. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005. Print. ---. Profanations: Collected Essay in Philosophy. Ed. and trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. New York: U of Stanford P, 1999. Print. ---. The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-life. Trans. Adam Kotsko. California: U of Stanford P, 2013. Print. Atwood, Margaret. Oryx and Crake. New York: Anchor Books, 2003. Print.---. The Year of the Flood. New York: Anchor Books, 2009. Print. ---. MaddAddam. New York: Nan A. Talese/Doubleday, 2013. Print.---. The Handmaid’s Tale. New York: Anchor, 1998. Print.---. Interview by Ed Finn. “An Interview with Margaret Atwood.” Slate.com. 6 March. 2012. Web. ---. “Why I Wrote MaddAddam.” Wattpad. Web. 20 Oct. 2015.Barkan, Joshua. “Use Beyond Value: Giorgio Agamben and A Critique of Capitalism.” Rethinking Marxism. 21-2 (2009): 243-59. 4 Nov, 2016. Berardi, Franco ‘bifo.’ Heroes: Mass Murder and Suicide. New York: Verso, 2015. Print. Behrent, Michael. C.. “Liberalism without Humanism: Michel Foucault andFree-Market Creed, 1976-1979.” Foucault and Neoliberalism. Ed. Daniel Zamora and Michael C. Behrent. Oxford: Polity Press, 2015. 63-84. Print. Bouson, J. Brooks. “It’s Game over Forever: Atwood’s Satiric Vision of a Bioengineered Posthuman Future in Oryx and Crake.” Margaret Atwood.Ed. Harold. Bloom. New York: Bloom’s Literary Criticism, 2009. Print.Buck-Moss, Susan. “Mythic History: Fetish.” The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991. Print. Cooke, Grayson. “Technics and the Human at Zero-hour: Margaret Atwood’s Oryxand Crake.” Canadian Literature, 31-2 (2006): 63-83.Dardot, Pierre., and Christian Laval. The New Way of the World. Trans. Gregory Elliot. London: Verso, 2013. Deleuze, Gilles. “Postscript on the Societies of Control.” JSTOR, 59 (1992): 3-7. ---. Foucault. Ed. and trans. Seán Hand. London: Athlone Press, 1988. Print. Foucault, Michel. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1977-78. Ed. Michel Senellart. Trans. Graham Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. Print.---. “Lives of Infamous Men.” The Essential Foucault: Selections from the Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Ed. Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose. New York: New Press, 2003. Print. ---. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College De France. Ed. Arnold I. Davidson. Trans. Graham Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. Print.---. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin, 1991. Print. Griffiths, Anthony. “Genetics According to Oryx and Crake.” Canadian Literature,181 (2004): 192-95.Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: U of Oxford P, 2005. Print. ---. The New Imperialism. Oxford: U of Oxford P, 2003. PrintHardt, Michel., and Antonio Negri. Empire. Cambridge: U of Harvard P, 2000. Print. Hardt, Michel. “The Withering of Civil Society.” Social Text, 45 (1995): 27-44. 黃, 嬿霖. The Regime of Bio-power: Resistance and the Care of the Self in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake. MA Thesis. Kaushiung Normal University. 2014. Print.Howells, Coral Ann., editor. “Margaret Atwood`s Dystopian Visions: The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. New York: U of Cambridge P, 2006. 161-175. Print.---. Margaret Atwood. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Print.Ingersoll, Earl G. “Survival in Margaret Atwood’s Novel Oryx and Crake.” MargaretAtwood. 127-142. Print. Labudová, Katarina. “Power, Pain, and Manipulation in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood.” Brno Studies in English, 36-1 (2010): 135-46.Lemke, Thomas. “Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique.” Rethinking Marxism, 14-3 (2002): 49-64.---. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. Trans. Eric Frederick Trump. New York: U of New York P, 2011. Print. ---. “‘The Birth of Bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the College De France on Neo-liberal Governmentality.” Economy and Society, 30-2 (2001): 190-207.---. “Foucault, Politics and Failure.” Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality. Ed. Jakob Nilsson and Sven-Olov Wallenstein. Huddinge: U of Södertörn P, 2103.Miller, Keith. “How Important Was Oil in World War II?” History News Network. Web. Ojakangas, Mika. “Impossible Dialogue on Bio-power.” Foucault Studies, 2 (2005): 5-28. Oksala, Johanna. “Neoliberalism and Biopolitical Governmentality.” Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality. Ed. Jakob Nilsson and Sven-Olov Wallenstein. Stockholm: Södertörn, 2013. Passavant, Paul A.. “The Contradictory State of Giorgio Agamben.” Political Theory. 35-2 (2007): 147-74. 1 Apr, 2016.Patankar, Prachi and Ahilan Kadirgamar. “Where Next for Occupy Wall Street?” The Guardian. Web. Prozorov, Sergei. Foucault, Freedom and Sovereignty. England: Ashgate, 2007. Print. Negri, Antonio. The Politics of Subversion: A Manifesto for the Twenty-first Century.Trans. James Newell. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989. Print. Read, Jason. “A Genealogy of Homo-Economicus: Neoliberalism and the Production of Subjectivity.” Foucault Studies, 6 (2009): 25-36. Rehmann, Jan. “The Unfulfilled Promise of the Late Foucault and Foucaudian‘Govermentality’ Studies.” Foucault and Neoliberalism. 134-158. Print.Schotten, C. Heike. “Against Totalitarianism: Agamben, Foucault, and the Politics of Critique.” Foucault Studies, 20 (2015): 155-179.Singh, Nikhil. “The Afterlife of Fascism.” South Atlantic Quarterly, 105-1 (2006): 71-93. 8 Nov. 2015.Somacarrera, Pilar “Power politics: Power and Identity.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. 43-57. Print. Vials, Chris. “Margaret Atwood’s Dystopic Fiction and the Contradictions of Neoliberal Freedom.” Textual Practice, 29-2 (2015): 235-54. Huang, Yi-Chuan. Reading Biotechnology: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake. MA Thesis. Tsing Hua University. 2009. Print. Yuhas, Alan. “Nato Commander: Isis ‘Spreading Like Cancer’ Among Refugees.” Theguardian. Web. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
102551014資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1025510141 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 邱彥彬 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chiou, Yen-Bin en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 鄧安廷 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Teng, An-Ting en_US dc.creator (作者) 鄧安廷 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Teng, An-Ting en_US dc.date (日期) 2017 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Mar-2017 17:00:00 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Mar-2017 17:00:00 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Mar-2017 17:00:00 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1025510141 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/106801 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 102551014 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 瑪格麗特‧愛特伍的《瘋狂亞當三部曲》描繪了當代讀者所熟悉的世界: 一個受新自由主義浪潮席捲的社會。當政府權力被龐大財團架空，自由國家的民主核心價值早已崩解。 本篇論文的論點延伸自Chris Vials 的文章，並試圖以新自由主義統治論述來解釋小說中民主與極權融為一體的情況。第一章解釋新經濟思維使個人與社會產生疏離，以統治極端分化的社會階層。第二章則闡述小說中的國家已陷入例外狀態，法律受到懸置，而圍牆的設立強化了排除生命的機制並且產生 “裸命”。在最後的章節將探討上帝的園丁會 “生命-形式” 的革命以及《瘋狂亞當》的主角澤伯所展現的 “無身份” 抵抗的可能性。 如同書中角色，身處於當代的讀者正受到這股 “未來的浪潮” 推進向前卻同時又受到過去的夢靨所困。世界大戰、猶太人集中營不只是已過去的歷史事實，他們以不同形式再現且縈繞不去。如何撿拾過去的傷痛與錯誤，承接死去之人的意志正是我們必須肩負的責任。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) In Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy, the author imagines a near future that is too familiar for the reader who live in the contemporary period, a neoliberal society. Through the depiction of a hollowed-out nation replaced by a giant consortium, she lays bare a truth that democracy is going to collapse. Based on Chris Vials’ article, “Margaret Atwood’s Dystopic Fiction and the Contradictions of Neoliberal Freedom,” this thesis furthers to elaborate the integration of democratic regime and totalitarianism by discourse of neoliberal governance: the neoliberal rationality alienates individuals, uniting the divided social stratifications. In the second part, I suggest that the nation falls into an anarchy since it has already entered into a state of exception, which gives rise to “bare life.” The exclusion mechanism is represented by the construction of “the Walls.” The third chapter aims to discuss the possibility of resisting the new form of sovereign power in practice of the God’s Gardeners about how to live “form-of-life” and politics of “(non)-identity” deployed by Zeb, the protagonist of MaddAddam. Like the characters, we stand in the intersection of the “Wave of future” and the recurring nightmare in the past. Global wars and concentration camp are not only historical facts but recurring events. It is our responsibility to recall the memory, remember the pain, and inherit the will of the dead. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Acknowledgements iiiChinese Abstract vEnglish Abstrac viChapter1. Introduction 1 Neoliberal governmentality 7 Giorgio Agamben’s concept of “bare life” 9 The Gardeners’ revolution: form-of-life 11 The politics of (non)identify 122. Neoliberal governmentality 15 Human capita 18 Alienation and social control 26 Neoliberal empire 313. Bare life 38 Immigrants and refugees 46 Paradigm of concentration camp 49 The Second World War and energy crisis 534. Form-of-life and politics of (non)-identity 58 The Gardeners’ way of living in simplicity 61 The politics of (non)-identity 695. Conclusion 78 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2072193 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1025510141 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) <<瘋狂亞當三部曲>> zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 瑪格麗特.愛特伍 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新自由主義 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 治理性 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 裸命 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 生命-形式 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 無身份 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) MaddAddam trilogy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Margaret Atwood en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Neoliberalism en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Governmentality en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bare life en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Form-of-life en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) (Non)-identity en_US dc.title (題名) 論瑪格麗特‧愛特伍《瘋狂亞當三部曲》中新自由主義治理論述，裸命，生命-形式及無身份 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Neo-liberal governmentality：bare life, form-of-life and (non)-identity in Margaret Atwood`s MaddAddam trilogy en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Agamben, Giorgio. Means without End: Notes on Politics. Trans. Vincenzo Binettiand Cesare Casarino. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2000. Print. ---. The Coming Community. Trans. Michael Hardt. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P,1993. Print. ---. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: U of Stanford P, 1998. Print. ---. State of Exception. Trans. Kevin Attell. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005. Print. ---. Profanations: Collected Essay in Philosophy. Ed. and trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. New York: U of Stanford P, 1999. Print. ---. The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-life. Trans. Adam Kotsko. California: U of Stanford P, 2013. Print. Atwood, Margaret. Oryx and Crake. New York: Anchor Books, 2003. Print.---. The Year of the Flood. New York: Anchor Books, 2009. Print. ---. MaddAddam. New York: Nan A. Talese/Doubleday, 2013. Print.---. The Handmaid’s Tale. New York: Anchor, 1998. Print.---. Interview by Ed Finn. “An Interview with Margaret Atwood.” Slate.com. 6 March. 2012. Web. ---. “Why I Wrote MaddAddam.” Wattpad. Web. 20 Oct. 2015.Barkan, Joshua. “Use Beyond Value: Giorgio Agamben and A Critique of Capitalism.” Rethinking Marxism. 21-2 (2009): 243-59. 4 Nov, 2016. Berardi, Franco ‘bifo.’ Heroes: Mass Murder and Suicide. New York: Verso, 2015. Print. Behrent, Michael. C.. “Liberalism without Humanism: Michel Foucault andFree-Market Creed, 1976-1979.” Foucault and Neoliberalism. Ed. Daniel Zamora and Michael C. Behrent. Oxford: Polity Press, 2015. 63-84. Print. Bouson, J. Brooks. “It’s Game over Forever: Atwood’s Satiric Vision of a Bioengineered Posthuman Future in Oryx and Crake.” Margaret Atwood.Ed. Harold. Bloom. New York: Bloom’s Literary Criticism, 2009. Print.Buck-Moss, Susan. “Mythic History: Fetish.” The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991. Print. Cooke, Grayson. “Technics and the Human at Zero-hour: Margaret Atwood’s Oryxand Crake.” Canadian Literature, 31-2 (2006): 63-83.Dardot, Pierre., and Christian Laval. The New Way of the World. Trans. Gregory Elliot. London: Verso, 2013. Deleuze, Gilles. “Postscript on the Societies of Control.” JSTOR, 59 (1992): 3-7. ---. Foucault. Ed. and trans. Seán Hand. London: Athlone Press, 1988. Print. Foucault, Michel. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1977-78. Ed. Michel Senellart. Trans. Graham Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. Print.---. “Lives of Infamous Men.” The Essential Foucault: Selections from the Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984. Ed. Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose. New York: New Press, 2003. Print. ---. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College De France. Ed. Arnold I. Davidson. Trans. Graham Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. Print.---. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin, 1991. Print. Griffiths, Anthony. “Genetics According to Oryx and Crake.” Canadian Literature,181 (2004): 192-95.Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: U of Oxford P, 2005. Print. ---. The New Imperialism. Oxford: U of Oxford P, 2003. PrintHardt, Michel., and Antonio Negri. Empire. Cambridge: U of Harvard P, 2000. Print. Hardt, Michel. “The Withering of Civil Society.” Social Text, 45 (1995): 27-44. 黃, 嬿霖. The Regime of Bio-power: Resistance and the Care of the Self in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake. MA Thesis. Kaushiung Normal University. 2014. Print.Howells, Coral Ann., editor. “Margaret Atwood`s Dystopian Visions: The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. New York: U of Cambridge P, 2006. 161-175. Print.---. Margaret Atwood. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Print.Ingersoll, Earl G. “Survival in Margaret Atwood’s Novel Oryx and Crake.” MargaretAtwood. 127-142. Print. Labudová, Katarina. “Power, Pain, and Manipulation in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood.” Brno Studies in English, 36-1 (2010): 135-46.Lemke, Thomas. “Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique.” Rethinking Marxism, 14-3 (2002): 49-64.---. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. Trans. Eric Frederick Trump. New York: U of New York P, 2011. Print. ---. “‘The Birth of Bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the College De France on Neo-liberal Governmentality.” Economy and Society, 30-2 (2001): 190-207.---. “Foucault, Politics and Failure.” Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality. Ed. Jakob Nilsson and Sven-Olov Wallenstein. Huddinge: U of Södertörn P, 2103.Miller, Keith. “How Important Was Oil in World War II?” History News Network. Web. Ojakangas, Mika. “Impossible Dialogue on Bio-power.” Foucault Studies, 2 (2005): 5-28. Oksala, Johanna. “Neoliberalism and Biopolitical Governmentality.” Foucault, Biopolitics, and Governmentality. Ed. Jakob Nilsson and Sven-Olov Wallenstein. Stockholm: Södertörn, 2013. Passavant, Paul A.. “The Contradictory State of Giorgio Agamben.” Political Theory. 35-2 (2007): 147-74. 1 Apr, 2016.Patankar, Prachi and Ahilan Kadirgamar. “Where Next for Occupy Wall Street?” The Guardian. Web. Prozorov, Sergei. Foucault, Freedom and Sovereignty. England: Ashgate, 2007. Print. Negri, Antonio. The Politics of Subversion: A Manifesto for the Twenty-first Century.Trans. James Newell. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989. Print. Read, Jason. “A Genealogy of Homo-Economicus: Neoliberalism and the Production of Subjectivity.” Foucault Studies, 6 (2009): 25-36. Rehmann, Jan. “The Unfulfilled Promise of the Late Foucault and Foucaudian‘Govermentality’ Studies.” Foucault and Neoliberalism. 134-158. Print.Schotten, C. Heike. “Against Totalitarianism: Agamben, Foucault, and the Politics of Critique.” Foucault Studies, 20 (2015): 155-179.Singh, Nikhil. “The Afterlife of Fascism.” South Atlantic Quarterly, 105-1 (2006): 71-93. 8 Nov. 2015.Somacarrera, Pilar “Power politics: Power and Identity.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. 43-57. Print. Vials, Chris. “Margaret Atwood’s Dystopic Fiction and the Contradictions of Neoliberal Freedom.” Textual Practice, 29-2 (2015): 235-54. Huang, Yi-Chuan. Reading Biotechnology: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake. MA Thesis. Tsing Hua University. 2009. Print. Yuhas, Alan. “Nato Commander: Isis ‘Spreading Like Cancer’ Among Refugees.” Theguardian. Web. zh_TW
