學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 Formative measurement test of supplier evaluation indicators and weight models
作者 洪敘峰
Chen, Suduan
Hung, Hsu Feng
貢獻者 企管系
關鍵詞 Cost accounting; Costs; Decision support systems; Supply chain management; Decision supports; Formative measurements; Management accounting; Procurement management; Supplier Evaluations; Quality control
日期 2016-05
上傳時間 15-Sep-2017 15:19:43 (UTC+8)
摘要 Supplier evaluation is very important for supply chain management, procurement management, cost accounting, and management accounting. The most critical step involved in constructing a supplier evaluation model is selecting supplier evaluation indicators and analyzing the corresponding weights. However, an effect will occur where supplier ratings moderate the correlation between supplier evaluation indicators and supplier performance. This study surveys 104 supplier evaluation specialists and collects evaluation data from 1028 suppliers. Statistical data analysis shows that, in the absence of supplier ratings, the supplier evaluation indicator can be considered as a reflective scale that represents supplier performance. If a supplier rating is in place, then the correlations between supplier evaluation indicators are significantly weakened, and supplier evaluation indicators are recognized as a formative scale. The study also finds, through an examination of six different weight models, that the importance of supplier evaluation indicators is ordered as: quality, price, delivery performance, customer service, and flexibility. The aforementioned research findings make a meaningful contribution to the literature on supply chain management and also serve as insightful references for business practices in supplier evaluation.
關聯 Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 44(3), 1350-1363
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/JTE20140426
dc.contributor 企管系zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 洪敘峰zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Suduanen_US
dc.creator (作者) Hung, Hsu Fengen_US
dc.date (日期) 2016-05
dc.date.accessioned 15-Sep-2017 15:19:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 15-Sep-2017 15:19:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 15-Sep-2017 15:19:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113038-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Supplier evaluation is very important for supply chain management, procurement management, cost accounting, and management accounting. The most critical step involved in constructing a supplier evaluation model is selecting supplier evaluation indicators and analyzing the corresponding weights. However, an effect will occur where supplier ratings moderate the correlation between supplier evaluation indicators and supplier performance. This study surveys 104 supplier evaluation specialists and collects evaluation data from 1028 suppliers. Statistical data analysis shows that, in the absence of supplier ratings, the supplier evaluation indicator can be considered as a reflective scale that represents supplier performance. If a supplier rating is in place, then the correlations between supplier evaluation indicators are significantly weakened, and supplier evaluation indicators are recognized as a formative scale. The study also finds, through an examination of six different weight models, that the importance of supplier evaluation indicators is ordered as: quality, price, delivery performance, customer service, and flexibility. The aforementioned research findings make a meaningful contribution to the literature on supply chain management and also serve as insightful references for business practices in supplier evaluation.en_US
dc.format.extent 203 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 44(3), 1350-1363en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cost accounting; Costs; Decision support systems; Supply chain management; Decision supports; Formative measurements; Management accounting; Procurement management; Supplier Evaluations; Quality controlen_US
dc.title (題名) Formative measurement test of supplier evaluation indicators and weight modelsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1520/JTE20140426
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/JTE20140426