學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 主管職務圖利罪之罪質與犯罪結構的分析反省
A Legal Dogmatic Study on Paragraph Structure of Abuse of Public Power for Private Profit
作者 許恒達
Hsu, Heng-Da
貢獻者 法律系
關鍵詞 圖利;公務員;賄賂;濫權;對向犯;獲得利益;misuse of public power for private profit;public officer;bribery;public malfeasance;correspondence offense;profit-gaining
misuse of public power for private profit ; public officer ; bribery ; public malfeasance ; correspondence offense ; profit-gaining
日期 2014-09
上傳時間 11-Oct-2017 11:56:11 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文討論貪污治罪條例第6條第4款公務員主管職務圖利罪(基本要件同於刑法第131條,以下簡稱圖利罪)的解釋問題,包括其法益內涵、侵害方式、構成要件的定性,以及獲得利益結果的各項解釋,討論中將尤其著重在最高法院對本罪提出的三項見解「圖利罪屬各類貪污罪名概括規定」、「獲得淨利為本罪結果」、「圖利罪屬對向犯」,筆者將透過法益概念與犯罪結構的實質解釋,主張:一、圖利罪非各類貪污罪名的概括規定,而屬刑法瀆職型犯罪的一種,其成罪結構不同於賄賂罪,並應在其客觀要件納入「致生財產損害」的實質要素。二、圖利罪的得利結果不必獲得淨利,只要有利得即足。三、圖利罪非對向犯,獲利一方亦可成立共同犯罪。
This article aims to research on the explanation of Profit by public official in Anti-Corruption Statute (Article 6-4), including the explanation its legal interest, the way to invasion, the constitutive requirements, and profit gaining. The research will focus on three opinion raised by Supreme Court: "profit by public official is a general provision of corruption crimes", "the outcome of the crime is net profit", and "profit by the public official is a kind of correspondence offense". This article claims that: 1. Profit by public officer is not a general provision of corruption crimes but a crime belongs to malfeasance. 2. Not only profit-gaining but also property-damaging constitute the punishment grounds of this crime. 3. Profit by public official is not a correspondence offense. The man who gains earnings constitutes complicity.
關聯 台大法學論叢, Vol.43, No.3, pp.719-769
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.6199%2fNTULJ.2014.43.03.04
dc.contributor 法律系
dc.creator (作者) 許恒達zh-TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Heng-Daen-US
dc.date (日期) 2014-09
dc.date.accessioned 11-Oct-2017 11:56:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Oct-2017 11:56:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Oct-2017 11:56:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113495-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文討論貪污治罪條例第6條第4款公務員主管職務圖利罪(基本要件同於刑法第131條,以下簡稱圖利罪)的解釋問題,包括其法益內涵、侵害方式、構成要件的定性,以及獲得利益結果的各項解釋,討論中將尤其著重在最高法院對本罪提出的三項見解「圖利罪屬各類貪污罪名概括規定」、「獲得淨利為本罪結果」、「圖利罪屬對向犯」,筆者將透過法益概念與犯罪結構的實質解釋,主張:一、圖利罪非各類貪污罪名的概括規定,而屬刑法瀆職型犯罪的一種,其成罪結構不同於賄賂罪,並應在其客觀要件納入「致生財產損害」的實質要素。二、圖利罪的得利結果不必獲得淨利,只要有利得即足。三、圖利罪非對向犯,獲利一方亦可成立共同犯罪。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This article aims to research on the explanation of Profit by public official in Anti-Corruption Statute (Article 6-4), including the explanation its legal interest, the way to invasion, the constitutive requirements, and profit gaining. The research will focus on three opinion raised by Supreme Court: "profit by public official is a general provision of corruption crimes", "the outcome of the crime is net profit", and "profit by the public official is a kind of correspondence offense". This article claims that: 1. Profit by public officer is not a general provision of corruption crimes but a crime belongs to malfeasance. 2. Not only profit-gaining but also property-damaging constitute the punishment grounds of this crime. 3. Profit by public official is not a correspondence offense. The man who gains earnings constitutes complicity.en_US
dc.format.extent 980001 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 台大法學論叢, Vol.43, No.3, pp.719-769zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 圖利;公務員;賄賂;濫權;對向犯;獲得利益;misuse of public power for private profit;public officer;bribery;public malfeasance;correspondence offense;profit-gainingzh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) misuse of public power for private profit ; public officer ; bribery ; public malfeasance ; correspondence offense ; profit-gainingen_US
dc.title (題名) 主管職務圖利罪之罪質與犯罪結構的分析反省zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Legal Dogmatic Study on Paragraph Structure of Abuse of Public Power for Private Profiten_US
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6199/NTULJ.2014.43.03.04
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.6199%2fNTULJ.2014.43.03.04