學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 經濟學術期刊的分等與臺灣各經濟學系所的學術表現
其他題名 Rankings of Economics Institutions in Taiwan and Journals
作者 曹添旺;管中閔;郭炳伸;張峯嘉;陳致綱
關鍵詞 引用次數;期刊分等;系所排名
日期 2006-09
上傳時間 3-Dec-2008 14:00:00 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文研究1996-2003年間台灣35個經濟學術單位之466位專任研究或教學人員的論文發表統計。除了依期刊資料庫別(SSCI、SCI、EconLit與TSSCI)進行數量分析外,亦嘗試由主、客觀之方法建置一套同時符合國際學術標準與配合國內學術發展的核心期刊名單與分等級群。同時,我們亦依據此一名單進行國內學術單位論文發表之質量分析。研究結果發現:一、不論依資料庫別或期刊等級進行分析,國際期刊發表之分佈呈現明顯偏態現象,即國內之學術研究工作過度依賴少數學術單位或個人;二、在本文研究樣本期間內,有超過五成的專任研究或教學人員未有任何重要學術期刊發表之經驗;三、相較於新加坡國立大學、香港中文大學、香港科技大學的經濟系所與北京大學中國經濟研究中心,國內僅專司研究的中研院經濟所與中研院社科所經濟組在整體學術表現上能與之相提並論。然而,國內教學單位之研究成果與該些華人系所仍存在一段不小的差距。 This study conducts a comprehensive ranking of academic institutions in Taiwan that produced scientific research from 1996 to 2003 in the commonly used economics journal indices. The output ranking is primarily based on a particular ranking of a set of core journals, a by-product from the study, which emphasizes citation information. Our investigations reveal that regardless of which index is employed, the distribution of the international publications are very left-skewed, implying a mass of the research generated by a small number of individuals or institutions; that more than 50% researchers displayed no record of publications during the sampled period; and that only the performance of two research units affiliated with the Academia Sinica was comparable to that of the economics departments in the Sino-Pacific region, but not that of the rest of the institutions engaged in teaching.
關聯 經濟論文, 34(3), 391-433
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) 曹添旺;管中閔;郭炳伸;張峯嘉;陳致綱zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2006-09en_US
dc.date.accessioned 3-Dec-2008 14:00:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-Dec-2008 14:00:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Dec-2008 14:00:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/12577-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文研究1996-2003年間台灣35個經濟學術單位之466位專任研究或教學人員的論文發表統計。除了依期刊資料庫別(SSCI、SCI、EconLit與TSSCI)進行數量分析外,亦嘗試由主、客觀之方法建置一套同時符合國際學術標準與配合國內學術發展的核心期刊名單與分等級群。同時,我們亦依據此一名單進行國內學術單位論文發表之質量分析。研究結果發現:一、不論依資料庫別或期刊等級進行分析,國際期刊發表之分佈呈現明顯偏態現象,即國內之學術研究工作過度依賴少數學術單位或個人;二、在本文研究樣本期間內,有超過五成的專任研究或教學人員未有任何重要學術期刊發表之經驗;三、相較於新加坡國立大學、香港中文大學、香港科技大學的經濟系所與北京大學中國經濟研究中心,國內僅專司研究的中研院經濟所與中研院社科所經濟組在整體學術表現上能與之相提並論。然而,國內教學單位之研究成果與該些華人系所仍存在一段不小的差距。 This study conducts a comprehensive ranking of academic institutions in Taiwan that produced scientific research from 1996 to 2003 in the commonly used economics journal indices. The output ranking is primarily based on a particular ranking of a set of core journals, a by-product from the study, which emphasizes citation information. Our investigations reveal that regardless of which index is employed, the distribution of the international publications are very left-skewed, implying a mass of the research generated by a small number of individuals or institutions; that more than 50% researchers displayed no record of publications during the sampled period; and that only the performance of two research units affiliated with the Academia Sinica was comparable to that of the economics departments in the Sino-Pacific region, but not that of the rest of the institutions engaged in teaching.-
dc.format application/pdfen_US
dc.format.extent 3250485 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language zh-Twen_US
dc.language en-USen_US
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 經濟論文, 34(3), 391-433en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 引用次數;期刊分等;系所排名-
dc.title (題名) 經濟學術期刊的分等與臺灣各經濟學系所的學術表現zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Rankings of Economics Institutions in Taiwan and Journals-
dc.type (資料類型) articleen