學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 臺灣經濟學期刊之再評比
其他題名 The Updated Ranking of Academic Journals in Economics
作者 郭炳伸;曹添旺;于若蓉;藍青玉;陳致綱
Kuo, Biing-Shen;Tsaur, Tien-Wang;Yu, Ruoh-Rong;Lan, Ching-Yu;Chen,Jhih-Gang
關鍵詞 期刊排序;期刊引用頻率;Journal ranking;Citation frequency
日期 2007-09
上傳時間 3-Dec-2008 14:00:04 (UTC+8)
摘要 研究成果品質的判定,在高等教育與研究機構之學術表現評鑑,及內部人事聘用與升等上,都扮演著非常重要的角色。就經濟學門而言,期刊論文是最重要的研究成果出版形式,因此期刊品質的判定對經濟學門的發展十分重要。台灣過去幾年,已有不少針對國際期刊與本國期刊評比之論著,以及根據這些結果所計算出之學術單位表現。然而,相關研究發表至今,經濟學研究領域發生不少變動,也有許多新期刊快速興起;僅以SSCI資料庫收錄之經濟期刊而言,其收錄數也在近幾年從二百多種增加到三百多種。有鑑於此,本文爰採用文獻中新近提出的客觀量化排序方法、並參考傑出學者專家的意見,重新對當前的國際及國內經濟學期刊加以評比排序,俾供參考。 In this paper we provide an updated ranking of international as well as domestic economics journals by their quality. A journal ranking list can be useful to researchers as a publication reference and to institutions as the basis for hiring, promotion, and resource allocation decisions. The existing list of journal ranking used by many institutions in Taiwan is based on decade-old data which may be considered outdated. It is therefore important to update the ranking using the most recent data. Both quantitative and qualitative measures are used in updating the ranking. The quantitative measure is based on the impact factor of a journal, and the factor is further adjusted using an axiomatic approach to obtain a robust index. For the qualitative measure, expert meetings were held and the opinions and suggestions therein are adopted to help shape the final ranking of the journals.
關聯 經濟論文, 35(3), 345-380
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) 郭炳伸;曹添旺;于若蓉;藍青玉;陳致綱zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Kuo, Biing-Shen;Tsaur, Tien-Wang;Yu, Ruoh-Rong;Lan, Ching-Yu;Chen,Jhih-Gang-
dc.date (日期) 2007-09en_US
dc.date.accessioned 3-Dec-2008 14:00:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-Dec-2008 14:00:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Dec-2008 14:00:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/12578-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 研究成果品質的判定,在高等教育與研究機構之學術表現評鑑,及內部人事聘用與升等上,都扮演著非常重要的角色。就經濟學門而言,期刊論文是最重要的研究成果出版形式,因此期刊品質的判定對經濟學門的發展十分重要。台灣過去幾年,已有不少針對國際期刊與本國期刊評比之論著,以及根據這些結果所計算出之學術單位表現。然而,相關研究發表至今,經濟學研究領域發生不少變動,也有許多新期刊快速興起;僅以SSCI資料庫收錄之經濟期刊而言,其收錄數也在近幾年從二百多種增加到三百多種。有鑑於此,本文爰採用文獻中新近提出的客觀量化排序方法、並參考傑出學者專家的意見,重新對當前的國際及國內經濟學期刊加以評比排序,俾供參考。 In this paper we provide an updated ranking of international as well as domestic economics journals by their quality. A journal ranking list can be useful to researchers as a publication reference and to institutions as the basis for hiring, promotion, and resource allocation decisions. The existing list of journal ranking used by many institutions in Taiwan is based on decade-old data which may be considered outdated. It is therefore important to update the ranking using the most recent data. Both quantitative and qualitative measures are used in updating the ranking. The quantitative measure is based on the impact factor of a journal, and the factor is further adjusted using an axiomatic approach to obtain a robust index. For the qualitative measure, expert meetings were held and the opinions and suggestions therein are adopted to help shape the final ranking of the journals.-
dc.format application/pdfen_US
dc.format.extent 2211977 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language zh-Twen_US
dc.language en-USen_US
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 經濟論文, 35(3), 345-380en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 期刊排序;期刊引用頻率;Journal ranking;Citation frequency-
dc.title (題名) 臺灣經濟學期刊之再評比zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) The Updated Ranking of Academic Journals in Economics-
dc.type (資料類型) articleen