學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 企業社會責任、民營化與補貼政策
Corporate Social Responsibility, Privatization and Subsidy作者 侯雨君
Hou, Yu-Chun貢獻者 翁堃嵐
侯雨君
Hou, Yu-Chun關鍵詞 混合寡占
民營化
補貼政策
民營化政策中立性定理
企業社會責任
環境企業社會責任
Mixed oligopoly model
Privatization
Subsidy policies
Privatization neutrality theorem
Corporate social responsibility
Environmental corporate social responsibility日期 2018 上傳時間 10-Aug-2018 10:51:36 (UTC+8) 摘要 過去探討民營化與政府補貼政策之文獻，大多將焦點著重在政府與廠商間的互動，鮮少將廠商因應消費者消費型態改變所衍生出的其他生產活動納入考量。有鑑於此，本文沿用White (1996)一文之分析架構，建構一混合寡占模型，並分別引入近年來受到消費者重視的企業社會責任(corporate social responsibility, CSR)以及環境企業社會責任(environmental corporate social responsibility, ECSR)。 本文研究顯示: (1)當生產不具外部性時，公私營廠商皆從事CSR活動的情況下，民營化政策中立性定理(privatization neutrality theorem)成立。(2)當生產具負向外部性時，公私營廠商皆從事ECSR活動的情況下，民營化政策中立性定理則無法成立。甚至當污染的邊際損害很大，而消費者對企業從事ECSR活動的偏好不顯著時，政府的最適政策將由補貼轉為課稅。(3)當生產會對環境造成汙染時，即使在公私營廠商皆從事ECSR活動的情況下，民營化仍會對整體社會福利造成負面影響，這與一般探討民營化與環境議題的文獻結果一致。
In the past, the literature on privatization and government subsidy policies are mostly focused on the interaction between government and manufacturers, and rarely considered other production derived from the changes in consumer’s consumption patterns. On that account, this paper follows the analysis framework of White (1996), and constructed a mixed oligopoly model introducing the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR) that have been valued by consumers in recent years. This paper shows: (1) The Privatization Neutrality Theorem is established when the production of both public and private firms is not external and are engaged in CSR activities. (2) The Privatization Neutrality Theorem cannot be established when both public and private firms have a negative production externality and are engaged in ECSR activities. When the consumer’s preference for ECSR activities is not significant, and even the marginal damage of pollution is tremendous, the government’s optimal policy will be converted from subsidies to taxation. (3) When the production leads to environmental pollution, even if both public and private firms are engaged in ECSR activities, privatization will still have a negative impact on social welfare; which is consistent with the general literature of privatization and environmental issues.參考文獻 胡憲倫、許家偉、蒲彥穎（2006）。策略的企業社會責任：企業永續發展的新課題。應用倫理研究通訊，40，37-50。 Alves, C. and Santos-Pinto, L. (2008). A theory of corporate social responsibility in oligopolistic markets. Working Paper. Becchetti, L. and G. Trovato (2011). Corporate social responsibility and firm efficiency: A latent class stochastic frontier analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(3): 231-246. Berens, G., van Riel, C. B., & van Bruggen, G. H. (2005). Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The moderating role of corporate brand dominance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 35–48. Beladi, H. and Chao, C.-C. (2006). Does privatization improve the environment? Economics Letters, 93(3):343–347. Cato, S. and T. Matsumura (2012). Long-run effects of foreign penetration on privatization policies. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 168, (3) 444-454. Cremer, H., Marchand, M., and J. F. Thisse (1989). The Public Firm as an Instrument for Regulating an Oligopolistic Market” Oxford Economic Papers 41, 283-301. De Fraja, G. and F. Delbono (1989). Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers, 41, 302-311. Fliess, B., Lee, H. J., Dubreuil, O. L. & Agatiello, O. (2007). CSR and trade: Informing consumers about social and environmental conditions of globalised production, Trade Policy Working Paper No.47 - PART I Working Party of the Trade Committee TD/TC/WP(2006)17/FINAL. Fjell, K. and J. Heywood (2004). Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization and the Order of Firm’s Moves: The Relevance of Privatization. Economics Letters, 83, 411-416. Garella, P.G., Petrakis, E. (2006). Minimum quality standards and consumers information. Economic Theory, Forthcoming. George, K. and La Manna, M.M.A. (1996). Mixed Duopoly, Inefficiency, and Public Ownership. Review of Industrial Organization, 11, pp.853-860. Häckner, J. (2000). A note on price and quantity competition in differentiated oligopolies. Journal of Economic Theory 93, 233-239. Hashimzade, N., Khodavaisi, H., & Myles, G. (2007). An irrelevance result with differentiated goods. Economics Bulletin, 8(2), 1-7. Hirose, K., S.H. Lee and T. Matsumura (2017). Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility: A Note on the First-mover Advantage under Price Competition. Economics Bulletin 37, pp.214-221. Ella Joseph (2002). Promoting Corporate Social Responsibility: Is Market-based Regulation Sufficient? New Economy9(2): 96-101. Kato, K., & Tomaru, Y. (2007). Mixed oligopoly, privatization, subsidization and the order of firms’ moves: several types of objectives. Economics Letters, 96, 287-292. Kopel, M. (2009). Strategic CSR, Spill-Over and First-Mover Advantage. Working Paper (Institute of Organization and Economics of Institutions, Graz, Austria). KPMG (2015). KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015. Lafferty B. A., Goldsmith, R. E. (1992). Corporate Credibility’s Role in Consumers’Attitudes and Purchase Intentions When a High versus a Low Credibility Endorser Is Used in the Ad. Journal of Business Research, (2): 109-116. Lin MH, Matsumura T (2018). Optimal privatization and uniform subsidy policies: a note. J Public Econ Theory. Liu, C.-C., Wang, L.F.S., and S.-H. Lee (2015a). Environmental Corporate Social Responsibilities in Differentiated Duopoly: A Welfare Analysis. Taiwanese Agricultural Economic Review, 22(2): 121-146. Liu, C.-C., Wang, L.F.S., and S.-H. Lee (2015b). Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a differentiated duopoly market. Economics Letters 129, 108–111. Manasakis, E. Mitrokostas, and E. Petrakis (2007). Corporate social responsibility in oligopoly. Working Paper 07-07, University of Crete, Department of Economics. Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in a mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 473-483. Matsumura, T., & Tomaru, Y. (2012). Market structure and privatization policy under International competition. Japanese Economic Review, 63, 244-258. Matsumura, T., & Tomaru, Y. (2013). Mixed duopoly, privatization, and subsidization with excess burden of taxation. Canadian Journal of Economics, 46(2), 526-554. Mullerat, R. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: A European perspective. Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series Vol. 13 No. 6, June 2013. Myles, G. (2002). Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization and the Order of Firms’ Moves: An Irrelevance Result for the General Case. Economics Bulletin, 12, 1-6. Ohori, S. (2006). Trade Liberalization, Consumption Externalities and the Environment: A Mixed Duopoly Approach. Economics Bulletin 17(5), 1-9. Pal, D., and M. D. White (1998). Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization, and Strategic Trade Policy. Southern Economic Journal 65, 264-281. Poyago-Theotoky, J. (2001). Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization and the Order of Firms’ Moves: An Irrelevance Result. Economics Bulletin, 12, 1-5. Robertson,T.S.& Gatignon, H. (1986).Competitive effects on technology diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 50(3), 1-12. Scrimitore, M. (2014). Quantity competition vs. price competition under optimal subsidy in a mixed duopoly. Economic Modelling 42, 166-176. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., and Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166. Tomaru, Y. (2006). Mixed Oligopoly, Partial Privatization and Subsidization.Economics Bulletin 12, 1-6. Tomaru, Y. and M. Saito (2010). Mixed Duopoly,Privatization and Subsidization in an Endogenous Timing Framework. Manchester School 78, 41-59. White, M. D. (1996). Mixed oligopoly, privatization and subsidization. Economics Letters, 53, 189-195. Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G. and Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, pp. 317–330. Zikos, V. (2007). Stackelberg Mixed Oligopoly with Asymmetric Subsidies.Economics Bulletin, 12(13), pp. 1-5. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
104255026資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1042550263 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 翁堃嵐 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 侯雨君 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hou, Yu-Chun en_US dc.creator (作者) 侯雨君 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Hou, Yu-Chun en_US dc.date (日期) 2018 en_US dc.date.accessioned 10-Aug-2018 10:51:36 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 10-Aug-2018 10:51:36 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 10-Aug-2018 10:51:36 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1042550263 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119308 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 財政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 104255026 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 過去探討民營化與政府補貼政策之文獻，大多將焦點著重在政府與廠商間的互動，鮮少將廠商因應消費者消費型態改變所衍生出的其他生產活動納入考量。有鑑於此，本文沿用White (1996)一文之分析架構，建構一混合寡占模型，並分別引入近年來受到消費者重視的企業社會責任(corporate social responsibility, CSR)以及環境企業社會責任(environmental corporate social responsibility, ECSR)。 本文研究顯示: (1)當生產不具外部性時，公私營廠商皆從事CSR活動的情況下，民營化政策中立性定理(privatization neutrality theorem)成立。(2)當生產具負向外部性時，公私營廠商皆從事ECSR活動的情況下，民營化政策中立性定理則無法成立。甚至當污染的邊際損害很大，而消費者對企業從事ECSR活動的偏好不顯著時，政府的最適政策將由補貼轉為課稅。(3)當生產會對環境造成汙染時，即使在公私營廠商皆從事ECSR活動的情況下，民營化仍會對整體社會福利造成負面影響，這與一般探討民營化與環境議題的文獻結果一致。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) In the past, the literature on privatization and government subsidy policies are mostly focused on the interaction between government and manufacturers, and rarely considered other production derived from the changes in consumer’s consumption patterns. On that account, this paper follows the analysis framework of White (1996), and constructed a mixed oligopoly model introducing the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR) that have been valued by consumers in recent years. This paper shows: (1) The Privatization Neutrality Theorem is established when the production of both public and private firms is not external and are engaged in CSR activities. (2) The Privatization Neutrality Theorem cannot be established when both public and private firms have a negative production externality and are engaged in ECSR activities. When the consumer’s preference for ECSR activities is not significant, and even the marginal damage of pollution is tremendous, the government’s optimal policy will be converted from subsidies to taxation. (3) When the production leads to environmental pollution, even if both public and private firms are engaged in ECSR activities, privatization will still have a negative impact on social welfare; which is consistent with the general literature of privatization and environmental issues. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第三章 基本模型 8 第四章 最適補貼政策下之CSR寡占市場 9 第4.1.節 補貼政策下的CSR混合寡占 10 第4.2.節 補貼政策下的CSR異質寡占 14 第五章 最適補貼政策下之ECSR寡占市場 17 第5.1節 補貼政策下的ECSR混合寡占 18 第5.2節 補貼政策下的ECSR異質寡占 22 第六章 結論 26 參考文獻 27 附錄一 31 附錄二 32 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1042550263 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 混合寡占 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 民營化 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 補貼政策 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 民營化政策中立性定理 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 企業社會責任 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 環境企業社會責任 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mixed oligopoly model en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Privatization en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Subsidy policies en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Privatization neutrality theorem en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Corporate social responsibility en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Environmental corporate social responsibility en_US dc.title (題名) 企業社會責任、民營化與補貼政策 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Corporate Social Responsibility, Privatization and Subsidy en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡憲倫、許家偉、蒲彥穎（2006）。策略的企業社會責任：企業永續發展的新課題。應用倫理研究通訊，40，37-50。 Alves, C. and Santos-Pinto, L. (2008). A theory of corporate social responsibility in oligopolistic markets. Working Paper. Becchetti, L. and G. Trovato (2011). Corporate social responsibility and firm efficiency: A latent class stochastic frontier analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36(3): 231-246. Berens, G., van Riel, C. B., & van Bruggen, G. H. (2005). Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The moderating role of corporate brand dominance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 35–48. Beladi, H. and Chao, C.-C. (2006). Does privatization improve the environment? Economics Letters, 93(3):343–347. Cato, S. and T. Matsumura (2012). Long-run effects of foreign penetration on privatization policies. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 168, (3) 444-454. Cremer, H., Marchand, M., and J. F. Thisse (1989). The Public Firm as an Instrument for Regulating an Oligopolistic Market” Oxford Economic Papers 41, 283-301. De Fraja, G. and F. Delbono (1989). Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers, 41, 302-311. Fliess, B., Lee, H. J., Dubreuil, O. L. & Agatiello, O. (2007). CSR and trade: Informing consumers about social and environmental conditions of globalised production, Trade Policy Working Paper No.47 - PART I Working Party of the Trade Committee TD/TC/WP(2006)17/FINAL. Fjell, K. and J. Heywood (2004). Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization and the Order of Firm’s Moves: The Relevance of Privatization. Economics Letters, 83, 411-416. Garella, P.G., Petrakis, E. (2006). Minimum quality standards and consumers information. Economic Theory, Forthcoming. George, K. and La Manna, M.M.A. (1996). Mixed Duopoly, Inefficiency, and Public Ownership. Review of Industrial Organization, 11, pp.853-860. Häckner, J. (2000). A note on price and quantity competition in differentiated oligopolies. Journal of Economic Theory 93, 233-239. Hashimzade, N., Khodavaisi, H., & Myles, G. (2007). An irrelevance result with differentiated goods. Economics Bulletin, 8(2), 1-7. Hirose, K., S.H. Lee and T. Matsumura (2017). Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility: A Note on the First-mover Advantage under Price Competition. Economics Bulletin 37, pp.214-221. Ella Joseph (2002). Promoting Corporate Social Responsibility: Is Market-based Regulation Sufficient? New Economy9(2): 96-101. Kato, K., & Tomaru, Y. (2007). Mixed oligopoly, privatization, subsidization and the order of firms’ moves: several types of objectives. Economics Letters, 96, 287-292. Kopel, M. (2009). Strategic CSR, Spill-Over and First-Mover Advantage. Working Paper (Institute of Organization and Economics of Institutions, Graz, Austria). KPMG (2015). KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015. Lafferty B. A., Goldsmith, R. E. (1992). Corporate Credibility’s Role in Consumers’Attitudes and Purchase Intentions When a High versus a Low Credibility Endorser Is Used in the Ad. Journal of Business Research, (2): 109-116. Lin MH, Matsumura T (2018). Optimal privatization and uniform subsidy policies: a note. J Public Econ Theory. Liu, C.-C., Wang, L.F.S., and S.-H. Lee (2015a). Environmental Corporate Social Responsibilities in Differentiated Duopoly: A Welfare Analysis. Taiwanese Agricultural Economic Review, 22(2): 121-146. Liu, C.-C., Wang, L.F.S., and S.-H. Lee (2015b). Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a differentiated duopoly market. Economics Letters 129, 108–111. Manasakis, E. Mitrokostas, and E. Petrakis (2007). Corporate social responsibility in oligopoly. Working Paper 07-07, University of Crete, Department of Economics. Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in a mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 473-483. Matsumura, T., & Tomaru, Y. (2012). Market structure and privatization policy under International competition. Japanese Economic Review, 63, 244-258. Matsumura, T., & Tomaru, Y. (2013). Mixed duopoly, privatization, and subsidization with excess burden of taxation. Canadian Journal of Economics, 46(2), 526-554. Mullerat, R. (2013). Corporate social responsibility: A European perspective. Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series Vol. 13 No. 6, June 2013. Myles, G. (2002). Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization and the Order of Firms’ Moves: An Irrelevance Result for the General Case. Economics Bulletin, 12, 1-6. Ohori, S. (2006). Trade Liberalization, Consumption Externalities and the Environment: A Mixed Duopoly Approach. Economics Bulletin 17(5), 1-9. Pal, D., and M. D. White (1998). Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization, and Strategic Trade Policy. Southern Economic Journal 65, 264-281. Poyago-Theotoky, J. (2001). Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization and the Order of Firms’ Moves: An Irrelevance Result. Economics Bulletin, 12, 1-5. Robertson,T.S.& Gatignon, H. (1986).Competitive effects on technology diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 50(3), 1-12. Scrimitore, M. (2014). Quantity competition vs. price competition under optimal subsidy in a mixed duopoly. Economic Modelling 42, 166-176. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., and Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166. Tomaru, Y. (2006). Mixed Oligopoly, Partial Privatization and Subsidization.Economics Bulletin 12, 1-6. Tomaru, Y. and M. Saito (2010). Mixed Duopoly,Privatization and Subsidization in an Endogenous Timing Framework. Manchester School 78, 41-59. White, M. D. (1996). Mixed oligopoly, privatization and subsidization. Economics Letters, 53, 189-195. Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G. and Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, pp. 317–330. Zikos, V. (2007). Stackelberg Mixed Oligopoly with Asymmetric Subsidies.Economics Bulletin, 12(13), pp. 1-5. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/THE.NCCU.PF.022.2018.F07 -
