學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 創意人才空間分布變遷對新創廠商影響之研究
The study of the impact of the creative class spatial distribution change on start-ups
作者 張逸凡
貢獻者 邊泰明
Ben, Tai-Ming
張逸凡
關鍵詞 創意人才
新創廠商
空間自相關
Tobit panel data model
Creative class
Start-ups
Spatial autocorrelation
Tobit panel data model
日期 2018
上傳時間 29-Aug-2018 15:57:43 (UTC+8)
摘要 Florida 認為對經濟成長貢獻最大的人力資本是創意資本,它
     是由社會的創意人才構成的,創意人才所擁有的創意對區域經濟成
     長有最大驅動力。新創廠商則是區域經濟的重要指標,對區域經濟
     成長有顯著影響。依照創業理論,創業與創新間密不可分。因此本
     文研究創意人才、新創廠商及創意產業新創廠商空間分布變化趨勢
     情形,並探討創意人才及其空間分布型態與新創廠商、創意產業新
     創廠商間關係。
     本文以民國85、90、95 及100 年工商普查資料為基礎,以空間
     自相關分析創意人才、新創廠商與創意產業新創廠商之空間分布變
     遷情形,再將創意人才及其空間分布型態與其他影響新創廠商之因
     素作為變數,運用隨機效果Tobit panel data model,分析創意人
     才及其空間分布型態對新創廠商、創意產業新創廠商之影響。
     實證分析的結果是對於新創廠商、創意產業新創廠商而言,創
     意人才與其空間分布型態中之HH 類型確實對其有正面顯著影響,但
     創意人才本身數量的多寡,相較於該地區與鄰近地區間所呈現出的
     創意人才空間分布型態,更為重要。
Florida mentioned that the greatest contribution of human capital to
     economic growth is creativity capital, which includes the creative class in
     society. The creativity provided by creative class is the most crucial
     element driving regional economic growth. Start-ups are critical indicators
     of regional economics and thus significantly impact regional economic
     growth. According to entrepreneurial theories, separating entrepreneurship
     and innovation is hard; therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore
     the space distribution change trends among creative class, start-ups, and
     start-ups in the creative industry, as well as the relationships among
     patterns between creative class and their space distribution, start-ups, and
     start-ups in the creative industry.
     This study was based on general commercial and industrial
     investigation data collected in 1996, 2001, 2006, and 2011, and then we
     applied spatial autocorrelation to analyze space distribution changes
     among creative class, start-ups, and start-ups in the creative industry.
     Patterns between creative class and their space distribution and the other
     influencing factors of start-ups were then applied as variables to create a
     Tobit panel data model with random effects on the impact analysis of the
     patterns between creative class and their space distribution to start-ups and
     start-ups in the creative industry.
     Based on the results of our analysis, for the start-ups and start-ups in
     the creative industry, an HH pattern between the creative class and their
     space distribution may have a positive significant impact. However, the
     number of creative class is even more important than the pattern of creative
     class’ space distribution in that region or neighborhood.
參考文獻 參考文獻
     一、中文
     丁家鵬,2005,「 台灣地方城市創意競爭力之比較研究」,國立政治大學企業管
     理研究所碩士論文:台北。
     王佳煌,2010,「文化/創意產業、創意階級/城市論著的批判性檢視」,『思與言』,48(1):131-190。
     牛涵錚、羅際屏、謝覲宇,2013,「挖掘與層析創業家之創新能力與創業家精神」,『管理研究學報』,13(1):119-150。
     呂昆樺,2014,「創意城市競爭力指標建構之研究」,『遠東學報』,31(2):71-84。
     巫立宇、王俊如、于卓民、邱志聖,2007,「資源、信任、支援廠商合作意願與高科技新創企業競爭力:以竹科廠商為例之跨期研究」,『管理與系統』,14
     (1):1-25。
     吳連賞、陳振杰、蔡漢生、黃茱珺,2011,「建構文化創意城市可行性研究-以高屏地區為例」,『城市發展』,6(2):25-53。
     吳慶烜、葉仲超,2008,「文化創意產業經營環境探討」,『嘉南學報』,34:
     806-816。
     金家禾,2007,「創意產業於台北都會中心區群聚發展之研究」,『都市與計畫』,34(4):343-361。
     洪世章、蔡碧鳳,2006,「企業興業與成長:比較個案研究」,『中山管理評論』,14(1):79-117。
     范惟翔、蔡明純、江品俞,2016,「新創事業活動過程之研究-以餐飲業為例」,『管理實務與理論研究』,10(1):66-87。
     陳志成,2009,「新創企業型態與區位選擇:台灣電子產業之實證」,『創業管理研究』,4 (3):105-127。
     陳志強,2010,「 機會辨識,網絡關係與核心資源累積-以新創廠商為例」,國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文:台北。
     陳家聲、吳奕慧,2007,「華人創業家心理與行為特質之初探」,『創業管理研究』,2(1):1-30。
     許英傑、黃慧玲、劉鳳冠,2007,「創業精神、創業機會與零售業態創新:以燦坤3C 連鎖店為例」,『創業管理研究』,2(1):165-196。
     曾昭玲、張立群、王冠倩,2012,「由不對稱資訊角度探討企業直接與間接負債融資決策」,『管理研究學報』,11(2):1-36。
     鄔建國,2003,「景觀生態學-格局、過程、尺度與等級」,台北:五南出版社。
     詹立宇,2002,「台灣地區製造業地理集中情形之觀察」,『產業金融季刊』,
     115:32-52。
     葉晉嘉,2010,「各國創意城市指標的比較性研究」,『城市發展』,5(1):111-44。
     楊維文,2011,「 新創廠商經營模式探討與個案研究-以電容式觸控面板為例」,國立台灣科技大學管理研究所EMBA 碩士在職專班碩士論文:台北。
     楊國斌、熊欣華,2011,「夥伴資源、創業策略與創業績效:以台灣資訊電子新創事業為例」,『管理評論』,30 (1):17-39。
     鄭美華,2008,「兩岸文化治理之比較分析-推動文化創意產業政策觀點」,『通識研究集刊』,12:101-130。
     潘宜萍、王思琦、李長斌,2014,「文化創意產業園區之「閒置空間再利用」、「群聚效應」與「周邊觀光影響」–臺中文化創意產業園區個案研究」,『觀光
     旅遊研究學刊』,9(1):29-51。
     經濟部文化創意產業推動小組辦公室,2003,臺灣文化創意產業發展年報。
     戴萬平、洪柏智,2012,「打造創意城市 : 曼谷經驗對大高雄創意產業發展的啟示」,『城市發展』,7(1):98-120。
     謝如梅,2009,「國際創業研究計畫:「全球創業觀察」之模式、方法與意涵」,『創業管理研究』,4(3):1-27。
     藺德、邱上嘉,2005 ,「台灣文化創意產業的回顧與展望」,『設計研究』,5:141-147。
     二、英文
     Armington, C., and Acs, Z. J., 2002, “The Determinants Of Regional Variation In New Firm Formation”, Regional Studies, 36 (1): 33-45.
     Bashir, S., and Gebremedhin, T., 2011, “An Analysis Of The Relationship Between New Firm Formation And Economic Development In The Northeast Region Of The United States”, Journal Of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 16 (03): 289-306.
     Bertacchini, E. E., and Borrione, P., 2013, “The Geography Of The Italian Creative Economy: The Special Role Of The Design And Craft-Based Industries”, Regional Studies, 47 (2): 135-147.
     Boschma, R. and Fritsch, M., 2009, “Creative Class and Regional Growth: Empirical Evidence from Seven European Countries”, Economic Geography, 85(4): 391-423.
     Cheng, S., and Li, H., 2011, “Spatially Varying Relationships Of New Firm Formation In The United States”, Regional Studies, 45 (6): 773-789.
     Cruz, S., and Teixeira, A. C., 2013, “Assessing The Magnitude Of Creative Employment: A Comprehensive Mapping And Estimation Of Existing Methodologies”, European Planning Studies, 22 (10): 2172-2209.
     Delfmann, H., Koster, S., McCann, P., and Dijk, J.V., 2014, “Population Change And New Firm Formation In Urban And Rural Regions”, Regional Studies, 48 (6): 1034-1050.
     Dollingers, M. J., 2003, Entrepreneurship: Strategies and Resources, Prentice Hall.
     Drucker, P., 1985, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, New York: Harper & Row.
     Florida, R. L., 2002, The Rise of the Creative Class: and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life, New York: Basic Books.
     Glaeser, E. L., 2005, “Review of Richard Florida`s the Rise of the Creative Class”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(5): 593-596.
     Gnyawali, D. and Fogel, D., 1994, “Environments for Entrepreneurship Development: Key Dimensions and Research Implications”, Entrepreneurship Theory andPractice,
     18: 43-62.
     Kerimoglu, E. and Karahasan, B. C., 2014, “Location Patterns Of Creative Capital And Regional Disparities In Spain”, Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 14(1): 114-
     139.
     Knoben, J., Ponds, R. and Van Oort, F., 2011, “Employment From New Firm Formation In The Netherlands: Agglomeration Economies And The Knowledge Spillover Theory Of Entrepreneurship”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23 (3-4):135-157.
     Lasch, F., Robert, F. and Le Roy F., 2011, “Regional Determinants Of ICT New Firm Formation”, Small Business Economics, 40 (3): 671-686.
     Lee, S. Y., Florida R., and Acs, Z., 2004, “Creativity And Entrepreneurship: A Regional Analysis Of New Firm Formation”, Regional Studies, 38 (8): 879-891.
     Lee S., Florida R. and Gates G., 2010, “Innovation, Human Capital, and Creativity”, International Review of Public Administration, 14(3): 13-24.
     Lucas, R. E., 1988, “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1): 3-42.
     Marlet, G. and Woerkens, C. V., 2007, “The Dutch Creative Class and How it Fosters Urban Employment Growth”, Urban Studies, 44 (13): 2605-2626.
     Mansury, Y. S., Tontisirin, N. and Anantsuksomsri S., 2012, “The Impact of the Built Environment on the Location Choices of the Creative Class: Evidence from Thailand”, Regional Science Policy and Practice, 4 (3): 183–205.
     Marrocu, E. and Paci, R., 2012, “Education or Creativity: What Matters Most for Economic Performance”, Economic Geography, 88(4): 369-401.
     Parajuli, J., and Haynes, K. E., 2017, “Panel Data Models Of New Firm Formation In New England”, REGION, 4 (3): 65.
     Petrov, A. N. and Cavin, P. A., 2013, “Creative Alaska: Creative Capital and Economic Development Opportunities in Alaska”, The Polar Record, 49(4): 348-361.
     Schumpeter, J. A., 1934, The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Reilly, C.J. and Renski H., 2008, “Place and Prosperity: Quality of Place as an Economic Driver”, Maine Policy Review, 17(1): 12−25.
     Renski, H., 2012, “The Influence Of Industry Mix On Regional New Firm Formation In The United States”, Regional Studies, 48 (8): 1353-1370.
     Trip, J. J., 2007, “Assessing Quality of Place: A Comparative Analysis of Amsterdam and Rotterdam”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(5): 501-517.
     UK DCMS, 2011, “The Creative Industries Economic Estimates Full Statistical Release”, London, 8 December 2011.
     Wang, S., 2006, “Determinants Of New Firm Formation In Taiwan”, Small Business Economics, 27 (4-5): 313-321.
     Westlund, H. and Calidoni, F., 2010, “The Creative Class, Social Capital And Regional Development in Japan”, Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 22(2-3):89-108.
     White, P., 2010, “Creative Industries In A Rural Region:Creative West: The Creative Sector In The Western Region Of Ireland”, Creative Industries Journal, 3 (1): 79-88.
     Zhu, S., and He, C., 2013, “Global, Regional And Local: New Firm Formation And Spatial Restructuring In China’S Apparel Industry”, Geojournal, 79 (2): 237-253.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系碩士在職專班
103923027
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103923027
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 邊泰明zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Ben, Tai-Mingen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張逸凡zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 張逸凡zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2018en_US
dc.date.accessioned 29-Aug-2018 15:57:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 29-Aug-2018 15:57:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Aug-2018 15:57:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0103923027en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119774-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 地政學系碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 103923027zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Florida 認為對經濟成長貢獻最大的人力資本是創意資本,它
     是由社會的創意人才構成的,創意人才所擁有的創意對區域經濟成
     長有最大驅動力。新創廠商則是區域經濟的重要指標,對區域經濟
     成長有顯著影響。依照創業理論,創業與創新間密不可分。因此本
     文研究創意人才、新創廠商及創意產業新創廠商空間分布變化趨勢
     情形,並探討創意人才及其空間分布型態與新創廠商、創意產業新
     創廠商間關係。
     本文以民國85、90、95 及100 年工商普查資料為基礎,以空間
     自相關分析創意人才、新創廠商與創意產業新創廠商之空間分布變
     遷情形,再將創意人才及其空間分布型態與其他影響新創廠商之因
     素作為變數,運用隨機效果Tobit panel data model,分析創意人
     才及其空間分布型態對新創廠商、創意產業新創廠商之影響。
     實證分析的結果是對於新創廠商、創意產業新創廠商而言,創
     意人才與其空間分布型態中之HH 類型確實對其有正面顯著影響,但
     創意人才本身數量的多寡,相較於該地區與鄰近地區間所呈現出的
     創意人才空間分布型態,更為重要。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Florida mentioned that the greatest contribution of human capital to
     economic growth is creativity capital, which includes the creative class in
     society. The creativity provided by creative class is the most crucial
     element driving regional economic growth. Start-ups are critical indicators
     of regional economics and thus significantly impact regional economic
     growth. According to entrepreneurial theories, separating entrepreneurship
     and innovation is hard; therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore
     the space distribution change trends among creative class, start-ups, and
     start-ups in the creative industry, as well as the relationships among
     patterns between creative class and their space distribution, start-ups, and
     start-ups in the creative industry.
     This study was based on general commercial and industrial
     investigation data collected in 1996, 2001, 2006, and 2011, and then we
     applied spatial autocorrelation to analyze space distribution changes
     among creative class, start-ups, and start-ups in the creative industry.
     Patterns between creative class and their space distribution and the other
     influencing factors of start-ups were then applied as variables to create a
     Tobit panel data model with random effects on the impact analysis of the
     patterns between creative class and their space distribution to start-ups and
     start-ups in the creative industry.
     Based on the results of our analysis, for the start-ups and start-ups in
     the creative industry, an HH pattern between the creative class and their
     space distribution may have a positive significant impact. However, the
     number of creative class is even more important than the pattern of creative
     class’ space distribution in that region or neighborhood.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 章節目錄
     第一章 緒論 4
     第一節 研究動機與目的 4
     第二節 研究範圍與內容 8
     第三節 研究方法與流程 9
     第二章 文獻回顧 11
     第一節 創意人才 11
     第二節 創意產業 18
     第三節 創業理論 26
     第四節 影響新創廠商之因素 30
     第四節 小結 37
     第三章 研究方法 39
     第一節 資料來源與研究變數 39
     第二節 空間自相關分析 46
     第三節 研究模型 50
     第四章 創意人才、新創廠商與創意產業新創廠商空間分析 53
     第一節 空間分布現況 53
     第二節 全域型Moran’s I 分析 57
     第三節 區域型Moran’s I 分析 62
     第四節 小結 68
     第五章 研究結果與分析 70
     第一節 敘述統計分析 70
     第二節 相關性統計分析 71
     第三節 實證結果分析 72
     第六章 結論與建議 78
     參考文獻 80
     一、中文 80
     二、英文 83
     附錄 86
     附錄一 創意產業分類表 86
     附錄二 創意人才、新創廠商及創意產業新創廠商分布統計表 90
zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103923027en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 創意人才zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新創廠商zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 空間自相關zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Tobit panel data modelzh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Creative classen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Start-upsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Spatial autocorrelationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Tobit panel data modelen_US
dc.title (題名) 創意人才空間分布變遷對新創廠商影響之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The study of the impact of the creative class spatial distribution change on start-upsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 參考文獻
     一、中文
     丁家鵬,2005,「 台灣地方城市創意競爭力之比較研究」,國立政治大學企業管
     理研究所碩士論文:台北。
     王佳煌,2010,「文化/創意產業、創意階級/城市論著的批判性檢視」,『思與言』,48(1):131-190。
     牛涵錚、羅際屏、謝覲宇,2013,「挖掘與層析創業家之創新能力與創業家精神」,『管理研究學報』,13(1):119-150。
     呂昆樺,2014,「創意城市競爭力指標建構之研究」,『遠東學報』,31(2):71-84。
     巫立宇、王俊如、于卓民、邱志聖,2007,「資源、信任、支援廠商合作意願與高科技新創企業競爭力:以竹科廠商為例之跨期研究」,『管理與系統』,14
     (1):1-25。
     吳連賞、陳振杰、蔡漢生、黃茱珺,2011,「建構文化創意城市可行性研究-以高屏地區為例」,『城市發展』,6(2):25-53。
     吳慶烜、葉仲超,2008,「文化創意產業經營環境探討」,『嘉南學報』,34:
     806-816。
     金家禾,2007,「創意產業於台北都會中心區群聚發展之研究」,『都市與計畫』,34(4):343-361。
     洪世章、蔡碧鳳,2006,「企業興業與成長:比較個案研究」,『中山管理評論』,14(1):79-117。
     范惟翔、蔡明純、江品俞,2016,「新創事業活動過程之研究-以餐飲業為例」,『管理實務與理論研究』,10(1):66-87。
     陳志成,2009,「新創企業型態與區位選擇:台灣電子產業之實證」,『創業管理研究』,4 (3):105-127。
     陳志強,2010,「 機會辨識,網絡關係與核心資源累積-以新創廠商為例」,國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文:台北。
     陳家聲、吳奕慧,2007,「華人創業家心理與行為特質之初探」,『創業管理研究』,2(1):1-30。
     許英傑、黃慧玲、劉鳳冠,2007,「創業精神、創業機會與零售業態創新:以燦坤3C 連鎖店為例」,『創業管理研究』,2(1):165-196。
     曾昭玲、張立群、王冠倩,2012,「由不對稱資訊角度探討企業直接與間接負債融資決策」,『管理研究學報』,11(2):1-36。
     鄔建國,2003,「景觀生態學-格局、過程、尺度與等級」,台北:五南出版社。
     詹立宇,2002,「台灣地區製造業地理集中情形之觀察」,『產業金融季刊』,
     115:32-52。
     葉晉嘉,2010,「各國創意城市指標的比較性研究」,『城市發展』,5(1):111-44。
     楊維文,2011,「 新創廠商經營模式探討與個案研究-以電容式觸控面板為例」,國立台灣科技大學管理研究所EMBA 碩士在職專班碩士論文:台北。
     楊國斌、熊欣華,2011,「夥伴資源、創業策略與創業績效:以台灣資訊電子新創事業為例」,『管理評論』,30 (1):17-39。
     鄭美華,2008,「兩岸文化治理之比較分析-推動文化創意產業政策觀點」,『通識研究集刊』,12:101-130。
     潘宜萍、王思琦、李長斌,2014,「文化創意產業園區之「閒置空間再利用」、「群聚效應」與「周邊觀光影響」–臺中文化創意產業園區個案研究」,『觀光
     旅遊研究學刊』,9(1):29-51。
     經濟部文化創意產業推動小組辦公室,2003,臺灣文化創意產業發展年報。
     戴萬平、洪柏智,2012,「打造創意城市 : 曼谷經驗對大高雄創意產業發展的啟示」,『城市發展』,7(1):98-120。
     謝如梅,2009,「國際創業研究計畫:「全球創業觀察」之模式、方法與意涵」,『創業管理研究』,4(3):1-27。
     藺德、邱上嘉,2005 ,「台灣文化創意產業的回顧與展望」,『設計研究』,5:141-147。
     二、英文
     Armington, C., and Acs, Z. J., 2002, “The Determinants Of Regional Variation In New Firm Formation”, Regional Studies, 36 (1): 33-45.
     Bashir, S., and Gebremedhin, T., 2011, “An Analysis Of The Relationship Between New Firm Formation And Economic Development In The Northeast Region Of The United States”, Journal Of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 16 (03): 289-306.
     Bertacchini, E. E., and Borrione, P., 2013, “The Geography Of The Italian Creative Economy: The Special Role Of The Design And Craft-Based Industries”, Regional Studies, 47 (2): 135-147.
     Boschma, R. and Fritsch, M., 2009, “Creative Class and Regional Growth: Empirical Evidence from Seven European Countries”, Economic Geography, 85(4): 391-423.
     Cheng, S., and Li, H., 2011, “Spatially Varying Relationships Of New Firm Formation In The United States”, Regional Studies, 45 (6): 773-789.
     Cruz, S., and Teixeira, A. C., 2013, “Assessing The Magnitude Of Creative Employment: A Comprehensive Mapping And Estimation Of Existing Methodologies”, European Planning Studies, 22 (10): 2172-2209.
     Delfmann, H., Koster, S., McCann, P., and Dijk, J.V., 2014, “Population Change And New Firm Formation In Urban And Rural Regions”, Regional Studies, 48 (6): 1034-1050.
     Dollingers, M. J., 2003, Entrepreneurship: Strategies and Resources, Prentice Hall.
     Drucker, P., 1985, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, New York: Harper & Row.
     Florida, R. L., 2002, The Rise of the Creative Class: and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life, New York: Basic Books.
     Glaeser, E. L., 2005, “Review of Richard Florida`s the Rise of the Creative Class”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(5): 593-596.
     Gnyawali, D. and Fogel, D., 1994, “Environments for Entrepreneurship Development: Key Dimensions and Research Implications”, Entrepreneurship Theory andPractice,
     18: 43-62.
     Kerimoglu, E. and Karahasan, B. C., 2014, “Location Patterns Of Creative Capital And Regional Disparities In Spain”, Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 14(1): 114-
     139.
     Knoben, J., Ponds, R. and Van Oort, F., 2011, “Employment From New Firm Formation In The Netherlands: Agglomeration Economies And The Knowledge Spillover Theory Of Entrepreneurship”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23 (3-4):135-157.
     Lasch, F., Robert, F. and Le Roy F., 2011, “Regional Determinants Of ICT New Firm Formation”, Small Business Economics, 40 (3): 671-686.
     Lee, S. Y., Florida R., and Acs, Z., 2004, “Creativity And Entrepreneurship: A Regional Analysis Of New Firm Formation”, Regional Studies, 38 (8): 879-891.
     Lee S., Florida R. and Gates G., 2010, “Innovation, Human Capital, and Creativity”, International Review of Public Administration, 14(3): 13-24.
     Lucas, R. E., 1988, “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1): 3-42.
     Marlet, G. and Woerkens, C. V., 2007, “The Dutch Creative Class and How it Fosters Urban Employment Growth”, Urban Studies, 44 (13): 2605-2626.
     Mansury, Y. S., Tontisirin, N. and Anantsuksomsri S., 2012, “The Impact of the Built Environment on the Location Choices of the Creative Class: Evidence from Thailand”, Regional Science Policy and Practice, 4 (3): 183–205.
     Marrocu, E. and Paci, R., 2012, “Education or Creativity: What Matters Most for Economic Performance”, Economic Geography, 88(4): 369-401.
     Parajuli, J., and Haynes, K. E., 2017, “Panel Data Models Of New Firm Formation In New England”, REGION, 4 (3): 65.
     Petrov, A. N. and Cavin, P. A., 2013, “Creative Alaska: Creative Capital and Economic Development Opportunities in Alaska”, The Polar Record, 49(4): 348-361.
     Schumpeter, J. A., 1934, The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Reilly, C.J. and Renski H., 2008, “Place and Prosperity: Quality of Place as an Economic Driver”, Maine Policy Review, 17(1): 12−25.
     Renski, H., 2012, “The Influence Of Industry Mix On Regional New Firm Formation In The United States”, Regional Studies, 48 (8): 1353-1370.
     Trip, J. J., 2007, “Assessing Quality of Place: A Comparative Analysis of Amsterdam and Rotterdam”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(5): 501-517.
     UK DCMS, 2011, “The Creative Industries Economic Estimates Full Statistical Release”, London, 8 December 2011.
     Wang, S., 2006, “Determinants Of New Firm Formation In Taiwan”, Small Business Economics, 27 (4-5): 313-321.
     Westlund, H. and Calidoni, F., 2010, “The Creative Class, Social Capital And Regional Development in Japan”, Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 22(2-3):89-108.
     White, P., 2010, “Creative Industries In A Rural Region:Creative West: The Creative Sector In The Western Region Of Ireland”, Creative Industries Journal, 3 (1): 79-88.
     Zhu, S., and He, C., 2013, “Global, Regional And Local: New Firm Formation And Spatial Restructuring In China’S Apparel Industry”, Geojournal, 79 (2): 237-253.
zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/THE.NCCU.MPLE.009.2018.A05-