學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 導向的技術進步、工資不均度與經濟成長：專利權保護政策的分析
Directed Technical Change, Wage Inequality and Economic Growth: An Analysis of Patent Protection Policy作者 蔡鈞晏
Tsai, Chun-Yen貢獻者 賴景昌
Lai, Ching-Chong
蔡鈞晏
Tsai, Chun-Yen關鍵詞 導向的技術進步
專利權保護程度
相對研發數量
工資不均
經濟成長
Directed technical change
Patent protection policy
Relative technologies
Wage inequality
Economic growth日期 2019 上傳時間 7-Aug-2019 16:49:09 (UTC+8) 摘要 本文建構一個簡單的R&D成長模型，特色為導向的技術進步與專利權保護程度，比較整體經濟存在一體適用的專利權保護程度與非一體適用的專利權保護程度，對於整體的技術發展發向、工資不均度及經濟成長將有何影響。我們有以下幾點發現，第一，一體適用的專利權保護程度將使得技術發展方向均衡發展；非一體適用的專利權保護程度將使得技術朝向專利權保護程度較高的產業發展。第二，非一體適用的專利權保護程度造成工資不均度擴大，且主要透過兩種方式影響工資不均度，分別為相對價格效果與技術導向效果。第三，一體適用的專利權保護程度使得資源配置較有效率，故擁有較高的經濟成長率；非一體適用的專利權保護程度使得資源配置較無效率，導致較低的經濟成長率。
This thesis sets up an R&D-based growth model featuring directed technical change and patent protection, and uses it to examine the relative effects of the relative technologies, wage inequality, and economic growth between one-size-fits-all patent protection and one-size-not-fit-all counterpart. Several main findings emerge from the analysis. First, the one-size-fits-all patent protection policy leads to neutral technical change between high-skilled and low-skilled R&D sectors, while the one-size-not-fit-all patent protection policy results in biased technical change toward the higher patent protection industry. Second, one-size-not-fit-all patent protection tends to raise wage inequality by way of two channels: the relative price effect and directed technical change effect. Third, because the one-size-fits-all patent protection policy makes the resource allocation more efficient, it exhibits a higher economic growth rate compared to one-size-not-fit-all patent protection policy.參考文獻 一、 中文部分賴景昌 (2018)。R&D內生成長理論，講義。賴景昌 (2018)。R&D內生成長理論：導向的技術進步，講義。二、 英文部分Acemoglu, D. (1998). Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, pp. 1055-1089.Acemoglu, D. (2002). Directed Technical Change, The Review of Economic Studies 69, pp. 781-809.Acemoglu, D. (2003). Patterns of Skill Premia, The Review of Economic Studies 70, pp. 199-230.Acemoglu, D. and Akcigit, U. (2009). State-Dependent Intellectual Property Rights Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper: 12775.Acemoglu, D. and Autor, D. (2011). Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings, Handbook of Labor Economics 4B, pp. 1044-1166. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L. and Hemous, D. (2012). The Environment and Directed Technical Change, The American Economic Review 102, pp. 131-166.Acemoglu, D., Gancia, G. and Zilibotti, F. (2015). Offshoring and Directed Technical Change, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7, pp. 84-122.Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction, Econometrica 60, pp. 323-351.Aghion, P. (2002). Schumpeterian Growth Theory and the Dynamics of Income Inequality, Econometrica 70, pp. 855-885.Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hémous, D., Martin, R. and Reenen, J V. (2016). Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry, Journal of Political Economy 124, pp. 1-51.Burk, D. and Lemley, M. (2009). The Patent Crisis and How the Courts Can Solve It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Chu, A. C., (2011). The Welfare Cost of One-Size-Fits-All Patent Protection, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35, pp. 876-890.Gallini, N. T. (1992). Patent Policy and Costly Imitation, The RAND Journal of Economics 23, pp. 52-63.Gilbert, R. and Shapiro, C. (1990). Optimal Patent Length and Breadth, The RAND Journal of Economics 21, pp. 106-112.Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MA, Cambridge: MIT Press.Heijdra, B. (2009). Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.Jones, C. I. (1995). R & D-Based Models of Economic Growth. Journal of political Economy 103, pp. 759-784.Katz, L. F. and Murphy, K. M. (1992). Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, pp. 35-78.Klemperer, P. (1990). How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be, The RAND Journal of Economics 21, pp. 113-130.Krueger, A. B. (1993). How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence From Microdata, 1984–1989, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, pp. 33-60.Lerner, J. (1994). The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis. The RAND Journal of Economics, pp. 319-333.Norhaus, W. D. (1969). Invention, Growth, and Welfare. MA, Cambridge: MIT Press.O`Donoghue, T. and Zweimüller, J. (2004). Patents in a Model of Endogenous Growth, Journal of Economic Growth 9, pp. 81-123.Rivera-Batiz, L. A. and Romer, P. M. (1991). Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, pp. 531-555.Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98, pp. 71-102.Scherer, F. M. (1972). Nordhaus` Theory of Optimal Patent Life: A Geometric Reinterpretation, The American Economic Review 62, pp. 422-427.Segerstrom, P. S. Anant, T. C. and Dinopoulos, E. (1990). A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle, The American Economic Review 80, pp. 1077-1091.Wright, D. J. (1999). Optimal Patent Breadth and Length with Costly Imitation. International Journal of Industrial Organization 17, pp. 419-436.Young, A. (1993). Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing, Journal of Political Economy 101, pp. 443-472. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
106258035資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106258035 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 賴景昌 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Lai, Ching-Chong en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蔡鈞晏 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Tsai, Chun-Yen en_US dc.creator (作者) 蔡鈞晏 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Tsai, Chun-Yen en_US dc.date (日期) 2019 en_US dc.date.accessioned 7-Aug-2019 16:49:09 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 7-Aug-2019 16:49:09 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 7-Aug-2019 16:49:09 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0106258035 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124940 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 經濟學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 106258035 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文建構一個簡單的R&D成長模型，特色為導向的技術進步與專利權保護程度，比較整體經濟存在一體適用的專利權保護程度與非一體適用的專利權保護程度，對於整體的技術發展發向、工資不均度及經濟成長將有何影響。我們有以下幾點發現，第一，一體適用的專利權保護程度將使得技術發展方向均衡發展；非一體適用的專利權保護程度將使得技術朝向專利權保護程度較高的產業發展。第二，非一體適用的專利權保護程度造成工資不均度擴大，且主要透過兩種方式影響工資不均度，分別為相對價格效果與技術導向效果。第三，一體適用的專利權保護程度使得資源配置較有效率，故擁有較高的經濟成長率；非一體適用的專利權保護程度使得資源配置較無效率，導致較低的經濟成長率。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This thesis sets up an R&D-based growth model featuring directed technical change and patent protection, and uses it to examine the relative effects of the relative technologies, wage inequality, and economic growth between one-size-fits-all patent protection and one-size-not-fit-all counterpart. Several main findings emerge from the analysis. First, the one-size-fits-all patent protection policy leads to neutral technical change between high-skilled and low-skilled R&D sectors, while the one-size-not-fit-all patent protection policy results in biased technical change toward the higher patent protection industry. Second, one-size-not-fit-all patent protection tends to raise wage inequality by way of two channels: the relative price effect and directed technical change effect. Third, because the one-size-fits-all patent protection policy makes the resource allocation more efficient, it exhibits a higher economic growth rate compared to one-size-not-fit-all patent protection policy. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機與文獻回顧 1第二節 本文架構 3第二章 理論模型 4第一節 各部門決策行為 4第二節 競爭均衡 18第三章 專利權保護之長期均衡影響 20第一節 技術導向 20第二節 工資差距 26第三節 經濟成長率 32第四章 結論 35附錄A 36附錄B 38附錄C 40附錄D 41附錄E 42參考文獻 43 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1470821 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106258035 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 導向的技術進步 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 專利權保護程度 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 相對研發數量 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 工資不均 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 經濟成長 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Directed technical change en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Patent protection policy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Relative technologies en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Wage inequality en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Economic growth en_US dc.title (題名) 導向的技術進步、工資不均度與經濟成長：專利權保護政策的分析 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Directed Technical Change, Wage Inequality and Economic Growth: An Analysis of Patent Protection Policy en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文部分賴景昌 (2018)。R&D內生成長理論，講義。賴景昌 (2018)。R&D內生成長理論：導向的技術進步，講義。二、 英文部分Acemoglu, D. (1998). Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, pp. 1055-1089.Acemoglu, D. (2002). Directed Technical Change, The Review of Economic Studies 69, pp. 781-809.Acemoglu, D. (2003). Patterns of Skill Premia, The Review of Economic Studies 70, pp. 199-230.Acemoglu, D. and Akcigit, U. (2009). State-Dependent Intellectual Property Rights Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper: 12775.Acemoglu, D. and Autor, D. (2011). Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings, Handbook of Labor Economics 4B, pp. 1044-1166. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L. and Hemous, D. (2012). The Environment and Directed Technical Change, The American Economic Review 102, pp. 131-166.Acemoglu, D., Gancia, G. and Zilibotti, F. (2015). Offshoring and Directed Technical Change, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7, pp. 84-122.Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction, Econometrica 60, pp. 323-351.Aghion, P. (2002). Schumpeterian Growth Theory and the Dynamics of Income Inequality, Econometrica 70, pp. 855-885.Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hémous, D., Martin, R. and Reenen, J V. (2016). Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry, Journal of Political Economy 124, pp. 1-51.Burk, D. and Lemley, M. (2009). The Patent Crisis and How the Courts Can Solve It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Chu, A. C., (2011). The Welfare Cost of One-Size-Fits-All Patent Protection, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35, pp. 876-890.Gallini, N. T. (1992). Patent Policy and Costly Imitation, The RAND Journal of Economics 23, pp. 52-63.Gilbert, R. and Shapiro, C. (1990). Optimal Patent Length and Breadth, The RAND Journal of Economics 21, pp. 106-112.Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MA, Cambridge: MIT Press.Heijdra, B. (2009). Foundations of Modern Macroeconomics. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.Jones, C. I. (1995). R & D-Based Models of Economic Growth. Journal of political Economy 103, pp. 759-784.Katz, L. F. and Murphy, K. M. (1992). Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, pp. 35-78.Klemperer, P. (1990). How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be, The RAND Journal of Economics 21, pp. 113-130.Krueger, A. B. (1993). How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence From Microdata, 1984–1989, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, pp. 33-60.Lerner, J. (1994). The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis. The RAND Journal of Economics, pp. 319-333.Norhaus, W. D. (1969). Invention, Growth, and Welfare. MA, Cambridge: MIT Press.O`Donoghue, T. and Zweimüller, J. (2004). Patents in a Model of Endogenous Growth, Journal of Economic Growth 9, pp. 81-123.Rivera-Batiz, L. A. and Romer, P. M. (1991). Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, pp. 531-555.Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98, pp. 71-102.Scherer, F. M. (1972). Nordhaus` Theory of Optimal Patent Life: A Geometric Reinterpretation, The American Economic Review 62, pp. 422-427.Segerstrom, P. S. Anant, T. C. and Dinopoulos, E. (1990). A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle, The American Economic Review 80, pp. 1077-1091.Wright, D. J. (1999). Optimal Patent Breadth and Length with Costly Imitation. International Journal of Industrial Organization 17, pp. 419-436.Young, A. (1993). Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing, Journal of Political Economy 101, pp. 443-472. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU201900314 en_US
