1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 教育選擇權知識圖譜的可視化分析
Knowledge mapping of School Choice research: A visual analysis using CiteSpce
作者 趙夢菲
Zhao, Meng-Fei
貢獻者 吳政達
Wu, Cheng-Ta
趙夢菲
Zhao, Meng-Fei
關鍵詞 教育選擇權
知識圖譜
知識基礎
研究熱點
研究前沿
CiteSpace
school choice
knowledge mapping
knowledge based
research hotspot
CiteSpace
educational choice
research frontier
日期 2020
上傳時間 3-Aug-2020 18:27:26 (UTC+8)
摘要 近年來，國內對於教育選擇權的議題越來越重視，國外眾多研究者從各種不同的角度對教育選擇權領域的各個方面進行了大量的研究，這些研究對教育選擇權政策的制定起到了重要的作用。本研究先對教育選擇權相關研究進行整理與統計，在利用CiteSpace軟體進行進行視覺化分析，以探究教育選擇權之知識基礎、研究熱點與研究前沿，為後續相關研究者提供參考。
本研究以Web of Science核心合輯收錄社會科學索引（Social Sciences Citation Index,SSCI）等引文資料庫，以教育選擇權（school choice、educational choice）為檢索詞進行文獻檢索，一共獲得1584篇主題文獻，并採用CiteSpace軟體進行可視化分析。以文獻共被引聚類分析、關鍵詞聚類分析、突現詞分析來探討教育選擇權研究的知識基礎、研究熱點與研究前沿。
根據研究結果與分析，本研究之研究結論歸結如下：
一、教育選擇權之知識基礎為：市區學校、精準區隔界限、政治、多元入學文化、白人大遷移、美國理論、學生學習成就、學校選擇過程和宗教因素。
二、教育選擇權之研究熱點為：大熔爐、脫軌學校、就學機會、家庭教育行為、組織表現、特許學校、班级构成、限制自由。
三、教育選擇權之研究前沿為：不公平、種族與機制。
最後針對本研究結果，對教育選擇權之知識基礎、研究熱點和研究前沿，以及可視化知識圖譜未來發展等方面，提出建設性意見。
In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the issue of educational choice. Many researchers have a large number of studies on the education choice from various angles and various aspects ,which has become the guidelines in the actual reform of the education choice .This study sorts and stats the research related to educational choices, and uses CiteSpace for visual analysis to explore the knowledge base, research hotspots, and research frontiers of educational choices.
In this study ,the Social Sciences Citation Index was used from the core collection of the Web of Science database, and “ educational choice ” or “school choice” was used as the search term. Atotal of 1584 subject documents were obtained. This paper discusses the knowledge base, research hotspots and research frontiers of educational choice research with literature co-citation cluster analysis, keyword cluster analysis, and burst detection.
The conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows:
The knowledge base of educational choice research includes the following: urban school,hard bound,the politics, market, white flight, American theory, student achievement, school choice process and religious factor.
The hotspots in education choice research include the following: melting pot, detracking school, schooling opportunities, household schooling behavior, organization performance, charter school , classroom composition and restricted liberty.
According to the resulet of burst detection,the research frontiers of education choice were inequality, race and mechanism.
Finally, based on the results this study, suggestions are mentioned for the future studies on the knowledge of education choice, research hotspots, research frontiers and mapping knowledge domain analysis.
Keywords: school choice, educational choice, knowledge mapping, knowledge based, research hotspot, research frontier, CiteSpace
參考文獻 中文文獻
王立，冷伏海（2010）。簡論研究前沿及其文獻計量識別方法。情報理論與實踐，
33（3），54-58。
王佑鎂，陳惠斌（2014）。近十年我國電子書包研究熱點與發展趨勢──基於共詞
矩陣的知識圖譜分析。中國電化教育，328，4-10。
王俊斌（2013）。論當代「能力取向理論」發展及其對高等教育研究之影響。教
育科學期刊，12（2），1-22。
王俊斌（2016）教育制度中的社會正義理論分析──多元觀點與比較基礎建構。
臺灣教育社會學研究，16（2），29-63。
王家通（1998）。論教育機會的均等與公平──以概念分析為中心。教育政策論壇，
1（2），8-15。
何金針（2003）教育市場與教育政策。學校行政，28，29-44。
吳知賢、段良雄（1999）。臺灣地區公私立國中國小學校選擇模式。國家科學委
員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，9（2），254-268。
吳勁甫（2003）。從羅爾斯的正義觀談教育機會均等。學校行政，25，53-63。
吳清山、林天祐（1997）。教育選擇權。教育資料與研究，16，82。
吳清山、黃久芬（1995）。美國教育選擇權之研究。初等教育學刊，4，1-26。
李杰、陳超美（2016）。CiteSpace：科技文本挖掘及可視化（第二版）。北京：
首都經濟貿易大學。
李柏佳（2009）。家長參與學校教育權利之探討──以國民教育階段為例。學校行
政，60，140-168。
沈姍姍（1997）。教育選擇與控制理念的另類思考。教育資料與研究，9，14-15。
周淑卿（2001）。市場自由與國家介入——論全國課程架構的建立。國立臺北師
範學院學報，14，57-74。
林蘭櫻（1993）。家長教育選擇權之探究。研習資訊，5(21)，61-68。
邱均平（2000）。資訊計量學在圖書情報領域的應用──以核心期刊研究和測定為
例。情報理論與實踐，24（5），396-400。
邱均平（2001）。文獻資訊引證規律和引文分析法。情報理論與實踐，4（3），
236-240。
邱均平，劉國徽（2014）。國內耦合分析方法研究現狀與展望。圖書情報工作，7
（58），131-144。
侯海燕（2006）。基於知識圖譜的科學計量學進展研究（未出版之博士論文）。大
連理工大學科學學與科技管理研究所，大連市。
姜雷，張海（2014）。MOOC 研究熱點與發展趨勢的知識圖譜研究。中國遠程教
育，12，35-40。
候劍華（2009）。工商管理學科演進與前沿熱點的可視化分析（博士論文）。取自
http://www.doc88.com/p-5733425956158.html
秦夢群（2015）。教育選擇權研究。臺北：五南。
崔雷、鄭華川（2003），關於從MEDLINE 數據庫中進行知識抽取和挖掘的研究
進展。情報學報，22（4），425-433。
張炳煌（2000）。影響國中家長學校選擇因素之研究。載於楊思偉（主編），家長
學校選擇權（193-250 頁）。臺北市：商鼎。
張茂源（2005）。評析家長教育選擇權之理論與實務。學校行政，36，148-158。
張福建（1999）。多元主義與合理的政治秩序：羅爾斯政治自由主義評析。政治
科學論叢，8，111-132。
張德銳（1997）。誰選擇？誰損失？學校選擇權對教育機會均等的影響。載於中
國比較教育會，中國教育學會（主編），社會變遷中的教育機會均等（37-57
頁）。臺北：商鼎。
張德銳（2000）。新世紀我國中小學學校經營的方向。學校行政雙月刊，5，12-22。
莊勝義（1996）。市場導向與教育改革。國立台灣師範大學教育改革學術研討會
講稿，未出版。
莫家豪、羅浩俊（2001）。市場化與大學治理模式變遷：香港與台灣比較研究。
教育研究集刊，47，335-355。
許添明（2003）。教育財政制度新篇。臺北：高等教育。
陳明德（2000）。國民小學實施家長教育選擇權可行性之研究──以臺北縣為例（未
出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
陳奎熹（1996）。如何促進教育機會均等。彰化文教，37，4-6。
陳郁仁（1997）小留學生家長教育選擇行為之研究（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩
士論文系統。（系統編號：085NTPTC576014）
陳悅、陳超美、胡志剛、王賢文（2014）。引文空間分析原理與應用。北京：科
學出版社。
陳悅、劉則淵（2005）。悄然興起的科學知識圖譜。科學學研究，23（2），149
﹣154。
陳悅、劉則淵、陳勁、侯劍華（2008）。科學知識圖譜的發展歷程。科學學研究，
3（26），449-458。
陳榮政（2019）。教育行政與治理：新管理主義途徑。臺北：學富文化。
陳鴻賢、許素艷（2002）。教育改革潮流中之家長教育選擇權。學校行政，20，
129-138。
陳麗珠（2000）。美國教育財政改革。臺北：五南。
陶穎，周莉，宋豔輝（2017）。知識域可視化中的共被引與耦合研究綜述。圖書
情報工作，11（61），140-148。
湯堯（2010）。教育市場化與行銷思維策略之案例分析探究。教育學誌，24，
157-176。
馮朝霖（2006）。另類教育與二十一世紀教育改革趨勢。研習資訊，23（3），5-12。
黃乃熒（2000）。父母選擇的教育改革意義。載於楊思偉（主編），家長學校選擇
權（3-36 頁）。臺北市：商鼎。
黃嘉雄（1998）。學校本位管理政策下教育機會均等策略──英國為例。載於中華
民國比較教育學會、中國教育學會（主編），社會變遷中的教育機會均等
（143-180 頁）。臺北市：揚智文化。
黃福，侯海燕，任佩麗、胡志剛（2018）。基於共被引與文獻耦合的研究前沿探
測方法遴選。情報雜誌，12（37），12-35。
蓋浙生（1993）。教育財政學。臺北：東華。
趙蓉英、許麗敏（2010）。文獻計量學發展演進與研究前沿的知識圖譜探析。中
國圖書館學報，5，60-68。
劉世閔、吳育偉（2004）。家長教育選擇權：教育公平與績效的雙刃劍。國民教
育研究學報，12，19-40。
劉盛博，張春博，丁堃，劉則淵（2013）。基於引用內容與位置的共被引分析改
進研究。情報學報，12（32），1248﹣1256。
鄭新輝（1997）。家長教育選擇權的可行性分析。初等教育學報，10，389-415。
戴曉霞（2002）。高等教育市場化：臺、港、中趨勢。臺北：高等教育。
顏妙芳（2005）。新優派哲學對英國教育政策的影響。網絡社會學通訊期刊，51。
取自http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/51/51-25.htm
顏秀如（2003）。教育市場化的省思與反思。學校行政，27，99-109。
英文部份
Abdulkadirolu, A., & Roth, P. A. (2009). Strategy-proofness versus efficiency in
matching with indifferences: redesigning the NYC High School
match. American Economic Review, 99(5), 1954-1978.
Addonizio, M. F. (2003). From fiscal equity to educational adequacy: lessons from
Michigan. Journal of Education Finance, 28(4), 457-483.
Angrist, J. D., Pathak, P. A., & Walters, C. R. (2013). Explaining charter school
effectiveness. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(4), 1-27.
Apple, M. W. (1996). Culture politics and education. NY: Teachers College of
Columbia University.
Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education. London: Routledge.
Ball, S. J. (2003). Class strategies and the education market. British Educational
Research Journal, 52(4), 433-436.
Bast, J. L., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Can parents choose the best schools for their
children? Economics of Education Review, 23(4), 431-440.
Batteson, C. H. (1999). The 1944 Education Act Reconsidered. Educational Review,
51, 5-15.
Betts, J. R., Lorien, A. Rice, Andrew, C. Zau., Cory, R. Koedel., & Emily,
Tang.(2006). Does School Choice Work? Effects on Student Integration and
Achievement. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California
Bifulco, R., & Ladd, H. F. (2007). School choice, racial segregation, and test‐score
gaps: Evidence from North Carolina`s charter school program. Journal of Policy
Analysis and Management, 26(1), 31-56.
Bifulco, R., Cobb, C. D., & Bell, C. (2009). Can interdistrict choice boost student
achievement? The case of Connecticut’s interdistrict magnet school
program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 323-345.
Blank, R. K. (1989). Educational effects of magnet high schools (G-00869000789).
Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED313469.pdf
Blank, R. K., Dentler, R. A., Baltzell, D. C., & Chabotar K. (1986). Survey of magnet
schools: analyzing a model of quality integrated education. James H. Lowey and
Associates, 14, 1-72.
Booker, K., Gilpatric, S., Gronberg, T., & Jansen, D. (2004). Charter school
performance in Texas. Journal of Public Economics, 31(5), 1-30.
Brathwaite, J. (2017).Neoliberal education reform and the perpetuation of inequality.
Critical Sociology, 43, 429-448.
Brennan, D. L. (2002). School choice and social justice. NY: Oxford University.
Broughman, B., Steven, P., & Kathleen, W. (2011). Characteristics of private schools
in the United States: Results from the 2003-2004 private school universe survey.
National Center for Education Statistics, 4, 90.
Burgess, S., Greaves, E., Vignoles, A., & Wilson, D. (2015). What parents want:
School preferences and school choice. The Economic Journal, 125(587),
1262-1289.
Buxton, C. A. (2005). Creating a culture of academic success in an urban science and
math magnet high school. Science Education, 89(3), 392-417.
Carl, J. (2001). Freedom of choice: Vouchers in America education. Santa Barbara,
CA: Praeger.
Chan, D., & Mok, K. H. (2001). Educational reforms and coping strategies under the
tidal wave of marketization: a comparative study of Hong Kong and mainland.
Comparative Education, 37(1), 21-41.
Che, Y. K., & Tercieux, O. (2018). Efficiency and stability in large matching markets.
Journal of Political Economy, 127(5), 2301-2342.
Cheng, A., Trivitt, J.R., & Wolf, P.J. (2016). School choice and the branding of
Milwaukee private schools. Social Science Quarterly, 97(2), 362–375.
Chiang, H. (2008). How accountability pressure on failing schools affects student
achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(9), 1045-1057.
Christenson, B., Eaton, M., Garet, M., Miller, L., Hikawa, H., & Dubois, P. (2003).
Evaluation of the Magnet School Assistance Program,1998 grantees (Rep.
2003-15). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED482977.pdf
Chubb, J, E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. DC:
Brookings.
Cohen, D. (2002) The religious factor in private education. Occasional Paper,53,23-71.
Crain, R., Allen, A., Thaler, R., Sullivan, D., Zellman, G. L., Little, J. W & Quigley,
D. D. (1999).The effect of academic career magnet schools on high schools and
their graduates. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational
Education.
Cullen, J. B., Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2005). The impact of school choice on
student outcomes: an analysis of the Chicago public schools. Journal of Public
Economics, 89(5), 729-760.
Daniels. N. (1989). Reading Rawls: Critical studies on Rawls’ A theory of juscice. CA:
Stanford University.
David, M., West, A., & Ribbens, J. (1994). Mother’s intuition? Choosing secondary
schools. London: Falmer.
Dawood, D. C. (2009). College readiness and academic successes for arts magnet and
traditional high school graduates. Disssertations & Theses Gradworks,
17(9),13-20.
Denis, D. P., & Levine, M.(1984). Magnet schools: choice and quality in public
education. Phi Delta Kappan, 66(4), 265-270.
Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. G. (2011). Are high-quality schools enough to increase
achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children’s Zone.
American Economic Journal, 3(2), 158-187.
Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. G. (2015). The medium-term impacts of high-achieving
charter schools on non-test score outcomes. Journal of Political Economy,
123(5), 985–1037.
Dronkers, J. (1995). The existence of parental choice in the Netherlands. Educational
Policy, 9(3), 227-243.
Engberg, J., Epple, D., Imbrogno, J., Sieg, H., & Zimmer, R. (2014). Evaluating
education programs that have lotteried admission and selective attrition. Journal
of Labor Economics, 32(1), 27-63.
Figlio, D., & Rouse, C. (2006). Do accountability and voucher threats improve low
performing schools? Journal of Public Economics, 90(1), 239-255.
Friedman, M, (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Gamoran, A. (1996). Student Achievement in Public Magnet, Public Comprehensive
and Private City High Schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy
Analysis, 18(1), 1–18.
Garfield, E. (2001). From bibliographic coupling to co-citation analysis via
algorithmic historio-bibliography. PA: Drexel University.
Gewirtz, S., Ball, S., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education.
UK: Open University
Gintis, H. (1995). The political economy of school choice. Teacher College Record,
96(3), 492-511.
Greene, J. P., Forster, G., &Winters, M. A. (2003). Apples to apples: An evaluation of
charter schools serving general student populations. Education Working Paper
Archive, 4, 1-19.
Halsey, A. H. (1997). Education-culture, economy, society. NY: Oxford U.P.
Hastings, J. S.(2002). Information, school choice, and academic achievement:
Evidence from two experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4),
1373-1414.
Henig, J. R., & John, F. W. (1995). Rethinking school choice: limits of the market
metaphor. American Political Science Association, 89(1), 205-220.
Holmes, G. M., DeSimone, J., & Rupp, N. G. (2006). Does school choice increase
school quality? Evidence from North Carolina charter schools. Improving School
Accountability, 14, 131-155.
Howell, W. G., Wolf, P. J., Campbell, D. E., & Peterson, P. E. (2002). School vouchers
and academic performance: results from three randomized field trials. Journal of
Policy Analysis and Management, 21(2), 191-217.
Hoxby, C. M. (2003). School choice and school competition: Evidence from the
United States. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 10, 9-65.
Hubert, M. (1999). The politics of school choice. NY: Rowman and Littlefield
Pubulishers.
John , F. (2000).The market approach to Education: An Analysis of America’s First
Voucher Program. NJ: Princeton University.
Joseph, K. (1976). Stranded on the middle ground. London: Center for policy studies.
Kelley, F. (2018). Subject to evaluation: how parents assess and mobilize information
from social networks in school choice. Social Forum, 34(1), 158-180.
Kimelberg, S. M., & Billingham, C. M. (2013). Attitudes toward diversity and the
school choice process: middle-class parents in a segregated urban public school
district. Urban Education, 48(2), 198-231.
Kojima, F. (2013). Matching with couples:stability and incentives in large markets.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(4), 1585-1786.
Kurata, R. (2017). Controlled school choice with soft bounds and overlapping
type. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 58, 153-184.
Laws, L. (1987). Assessing outcomes of magnet schools. Academic Achievement,
34,12.
Levin, H. (1976). Educational Opportunity and Social Inequality in Western
Europe. Social Problems, 24(2), 148-172.
Li, X., Ma, E., & Qu, H. (2017). Knowledge mapping of hospitality research- A
visual analysis using CiteSpace. International Journal of Hospitality
Management, 60, 77-93.
Manski, C. F. (1992). Educational choice (vouchers) and social mobility. Economics
of Education Review, 11(4), 351-369.
Marcotte, D., & Dalane, K. (2019). Socioeconomic segregation and school choice in
America public schools. Educational Research, 48(8),132-146.
Margaret, D. T. (1995). Concepts and issues in school choice. Lewiston, NY: Edwin
mellen.
Martinez, V., Thomas, K., & Kemerer, F. R. (1994).Who chooses and why: A look at
five school choice plans. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(9), 678.
McCully, D., & Malin, P. J. (2003). What parents think of New York’s charter schools
(CCI-R-37). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED477791.pdf
Miron, G., & Nelson, C.(2004). Student academic achievement in charter schools:
What we know and why we know so little. NY: Teacher College.
Nelson, J. L., Carlson, K., & Palonsky, S. B. (1996). Critical issues in education: A
dialectic approach. NY: McGraw-Hill College.
Pathak, P. A.(2011). The mechanism design approach to student assignment. Annual
Review of Economics, 3(1), 513-536.
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research front of JASIS 1986-1990.
Journal of American Society for Information Science, 45, 31-38.
Peters, B. G. (1996). The future of governing: Four emerging models. KS: University
Press of Kansus.
Peterson, P. E., Campbell, D. E., & West, M. R. (2002). Who chooses? Who uses?
Participation in a national school voucher program. Hill Hoover
Institution,1,51-84.
Plucker, J., Muller, P., Hansen, J., Ravert, R., & Makel, M. (2006). Evaluation of the
Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program. Director, 812, 855-4438.
Power, S., & Whitty, G. (1996). Teaching new subjects? The hidden curriculum of
marketised education systems. Critical Studies in Education, 37(2), 1-21.
Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510-515.
Ray, B. D. (1994). A nationwide study of home education in Canada: Family
characteristics, student achievement, and other topics. OR: NHERI Publications.
Raywid, M. A. (1984). Synthesis of Research on Schools of Choice. Educational
Leadership, 41(7), 70-78.
Rhea, A., & Regan, R. (2007). Magnet program review. Wake County Public School
System, Evaluation and Research Department, 6, 5-45.
Robert, B., & Helen, F. L. (2006). The impacts of charter schools on student
achievement: evidence from North Carolina. Education Finance and Policy, 1(1),
50-90.
Robert, B., & Helen, F. L. (2007). School choice, racial segregation, and test score
gaps: evidence from North Carolina`s charter school program. Journal of Policy
Analysis and Management, 21(1), 31-56.
Rolf, K. B. (1983). Survey of magnet schools: analyzing a model of quality integrated
education. Office of Planning, 14, 1-74.
Rouse, C. E. (1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation
of the Milwaukee parental choice program. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113,
553-602.
Sass, T. R. (2006). Charter school and student achievement in Florida. Education
Finance and Policy, 1(1), 91-122.
Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence
from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133–144.
doi:10.3102/ 01623737024002133
Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer
choice and the quality of American schools. NJ: Princeton University.
Silver, D., Saunders, M., & Zarate, E. (2008). What factors predict high school
graduation in the Los Angeles Unified School District. Policy Brief, 14, 15-23.
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the
relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813.
Smith, P. H., Arnot-Hopffer, E., Carmichael, C. M., Murphy, E., Valle, A., González,
N., & Poveda, A. (2002). Raise a child, not a test score: perspectives on bilingual
education at Davis Bilingual Magnet School. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(1),
103-121.
Sneyers, E., Vanhoof, J., & Mahieu, P. (2018). Primary teachers’ perceptions that
impact upon track recommendations regarding pupils’ enrolment in secondary
education: a path analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 1153–1173.
Sobel, R. S., & King, K. A. (2008). Does school choice increase the rate of youth
entrepreneurship? Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 429-438.
Solmon, L., Park, K., & Garcia, D. (2001). Does charter school attendance improve
test scores? Comments and Reactions on the Arizona Achievement Study.
Upjihn Institute Working Paper, 70, 1-12.
Sugarman, S. D., & Kenerer, F. R. (1999). School choice and social controversy:
politics, policy and law. DC: Brooking Institution Press.
Trivitt, J. R., & Wolf, P. J. (2011). School choice and the branding of Catholic
schools. Education Finance and Policy, 6(2), 202–245.
Vanourek, G. (2005). State of the charter school movement 2005: Trends, issues, and
indicators. DC: Charter School Leadership Council.
Walford, G. (1994). Choice and equity in education. London: Cassell.
Weiher, G. R. (2001). Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools
and household preferences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,
21(1),79-92.
Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: the
school, the state and the market. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 24-36.
Witte, J. F., Sterr, T. D., & Thorn, C. A. (1995). Fifth year report: Milwaukee
parental choice program. WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Witte, J. F. (1996). Who chooses? Voucher and interdistrict choice programs in
Milwaukee. American Journal of Education, 104(3), 186–217.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育行政與政策研究所
107171016
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107171016
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳政達zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wu, Cheng-Taen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 趙夢菲zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Zhao, Meng-Feien_US
dc.creator (作者) 趙夢菲zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Zhao, Meng-Feien_US
dc.date (日期) 2020en_US
dc.date.accessioned 3-Aug-2020 18:27:26 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-Aug-2020 18:27:26 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Aug-2020 18:27:26 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107171016en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131268-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育行政與政策研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 107171016zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近年來，國內對於教育選擇權的議題越來越重視，國外眾多研究者從各種不同的角度對教育選擇權領域的各個方面進行了大量的研究，這些研究對教育選擇權政策的制定起到了重要的作用。本研究先對教育選擇權相關研究進行整理與統計，在利用CiteSpace軟體進行進行視覺化分析，以探究教育選擇權之知識基礎、研究熱點與研究前沿，為後續相關研究者提供參考。
本研究以Web of Science核心合輯收錄社會科學索引（Social Sciences Citation Index,SSCI）等引文資料庫，以教育選擇權（school choice、educational choice）為檢索詞進行文獻檢索，一共獲得1584篇主題文獻，并採用CiteSpace軟體進行可視化分析。以文獻共被引聚類分析、關鍵詞聚類分析、突現詞分析來探討教育選擇權研究的知識基礎、研究熱點與研究前沿。
根據研究結果與分析，本研究之研究結論歸結如下：
一、教育選擇權之知識基礎為：市區學校、精準區隔界限、政治、多元入學文化、白人大遷移、美國理論、學生學習成就、學校選擇過程和宗教因素。
二、教育選擇權之研究熱點為：大熔爐、脫軌學校、就學機會、家庭教育行為、組織表現、特許學校、班级构成、限制自由。
三、教育選擇權之研究前沿為：不公平、種族與機制。
最後針對本研究結果，對教育選擇權之知識基礎、研究熱點和研究前沿，以及可視化知識圖譜未來發展等方面，提出建設性意見。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the issue of educational choice. Many researchers have a large number of studies on the education choice from various angles and various aspects ,which has become the guidelines in the actual reform of the education choice .This study sorts and stats the research related to educational choices, and uses CiteSpace for visual analysis to explore the knowledge base, research hotspots, and research frontiers of educational choices.
In this study ,the Social Sciences Citation Index was used from the core collection of the Web of Science database, and “ educational choice ” or “school choice” was used as the search term. Atotal of 1584 subject documents were obtained. This paper discusses the knowledge base, research hotspots and research frontiers of educational choice research with literature co-citation cluster analysis, keyword cluster analysis, and burst detection.
The conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows:
The knowledge base of educational choice research includes the following: urban school,hard bound,the politics, market, white flight, American theory, student achievement, school choice process and religious factor.
The hotspots in education choice research include the following: melting pot, detracking school, schooling opportunities, household schooling behavior, organization performance, charter school , classroom composition and restricted liberty.
According to the resulet of burst detection,the research frontiers of education choice were inequality, race and mechanism.
Finally, based on the results this study, suggestions are mentioned for the future studies on the knowledge of education choice, research hotspots, research frontiers and mapping knowledge domain analysis.
Keywords: school choice, educational choice, knowledge mapping, knowledge based, research hotspot, research frontier, CiteSpace		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 2
第三節 名詞解釋 3
第四節 研究方法與步驟 5
第五節 研究範圍與限制 8
第二章 文獻探討 11
第一節 教育選擇權的理論基礎 11
第二節 教育選擇權在美國實施情況 21
第三節 教育選擇權相關研究 30
第四節 知識圖譜概述 35
第三章 研究設計與實施 43
第一節 研究架構 43
第二節 研究對象 44
第三節 研究工具 47
第四節 實施程序 55
第五節 資料處理與分析 59
第四章 研究結果與討論 65
第一節 教育選擇權知識基礎分析 65
第二節 教育選擇權研究熱點分析 84
第三節 教育選擇權研究前沿分析 99
第五章 結論與建議 105
第一節 研究結論 105
第二節 研究建議 108
參考文獻 109
中文文獻 109
英文部份 113		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 4035514 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107171016en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教育選擇權zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識圖譜zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識基礎zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研究熱點zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研究前沿zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) CiteSpacezh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) school choiceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) knowledge mappingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) knowledge baseden_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) research hotspoten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) CiteSpaceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) educational choiceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) research frontieren_US
dc.title (題名) 教育選擇權知識圖譜的可視化分析zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Knowledge mapping of School Choice research: A visual analysis using CiteSpceen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻
王立，冷伏海（2010）。簡論研究前沿及其文獻計量識別方法。情報理論與實踐，
33（3），54-58。
王佑鎂，陳惠斌（2014）。近十年我國電子書包研究熱點與發展趨勢──基於共詞
矩陣的知識圖譜分析。中國電化教育，328，4-10。
王俊斌（2013）。論當代「能力取向理論」發展及其對高等教育研究之影響。教
育科學期刊，12（2），1-22。
王俊斌（2016）教育制度中的社會正義理論分析──多元觀點與比較基礎建構。
臺灣教育社會學研究，16（2），29-63。
王家通（1998）。論教育機會的均等與公平──以概念分析為中心。教育政策論壇，
1（2），8-15。
何金針（2003）教育市場與教育政策。學校行政，28，29-44。
吳知賢、段良雄（1999）。臺灣地區公私立國中國小學校選擇模式。國家科學委
員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，9（2），254-268。
吳勁甫（2003）。從羅爾斯的正義觀談教育機會均等。學校行政，25，53-63。
吳清山、林天祐（1997）。教育選擇權。教育資料與研究，16，82。
吳清山、黃久芬（1995）。美國教育選擇權之研究。初等教育學刊，4，1-26。
李杰、陳超美（2016）。CiteSpace：科技文本挖掘及可視化（第二版）。北京：
首都經濟貿易大學。
李柏佳（2009）。家長參與學校教育權利之探討──以國民教育階段為例。學校行
政，60，140-168。
沈姍姍（1997）。教育選擇與控制理念的另類思考。教育資料與研究，9，14-15。
周淑卿（2001）。市場自由與國家介入——論全國課程架構的建立。國立臺北師
範學院學報，14，57-74。
林蘭櫻（1993）。家長教育選擇權之探究。研習資訊，5(21)，61-68。
邱均平（2000）。資訊計量學在圖書情報領域的應用──以核心期刊研究和測定為
例。情報理論與實踐，24（5），396-400。
邱均平（2001）。文獻資訊引證規律和引文分析法。情報理論與實踐，4（3），
236-240。
邱均平，劉國徽（2014）。國內耦合分析方法研究現狀與展望。圖書情報工作，7
（58），131-144。
侯海燕（2006）。基於知識圖譜的科學計量學進展研究（未出版之博士論文）。大
連理工大學科學學與科技管理研究所，大連市。
姜雷，張海（2014）。MOOC 研究熱點與發展趨勢的知識圖譜研究。中國遠程教
育，12，35-40。
候劍華（2009）。工商管理學科演進與前沿熱點的可視化分析（博士論文）。取自
http://www.doc88.com/p-5733425956158.html
秦夢群（2015）。教育選擇權研究。臺北：五南。
崔雷、鄭華川（2003），關於從MEDLINE 數據庫中進行知識抽取和挖掘的研究
進展。情報學報，22（4），425-433。
張炳煌（2000）。影響國中家長學校選擇因素之研究。載於楊思偉（主編），家長
學校選擇權（193-250 頁）。臺北市：商鼎。
張茂源（2005）。評析家長教育選擇權之理論與實務。學校行政，36，148-158。
張福建（1999）。多元主義與合理的政治秩序：羅爾斯政治自由主義評析。政治
科學論叢，8，111-132。
張德銳（1997）。誰選擇？誰損失？學校選擇權對教育機會均等的影響。載於中
國比較教育會，中國教育學會（主編），社會變遷中的教育機會均等（37-57
頁）。臺北：商鼎。
張德銳（2000）。新世紀我國中小學學校經營的方向。學校行政雙月刊，5，12-22。
莊勝義（1996）。市場導向與教育改革。國立台灣師範大學教育改革學術研討會
講稿，未出版。
莫家豪、羅浩俊（2001）。市場化與大學治理模式變遷：香港與台灣比較研究。
教育研究集刊，47，335-355。
許添明（2003）。教育財政制度新篇。臺北：高等教育。
陳明德（2000）。國民小學實施家長教育選擇權可行性之研究──以臺北縣為例（未
出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
陳奎熹（1996）。如何促進教育機會均等。彰化文教，37，4-6。
陳郁仁（1997）小留學生家長教育選擇行為之研究（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩
士論文系統。（系統編號：085NTPTC576014）
陳悅、陳超美、胡志剛、王賢文（2014）。引文空間分析原理與應用。北京：科
學出版社。
陳悅、劉則淵（2005）。悄然興起的科學知識圖譜。科學學研究，23（2），149
﹣154。
陳悅、劉則淵、陳勁、侯劍華（2008）。科學知識圖譜的發展歷程。科學學研究，
3（26），449-458。
陳榮政（2019）。教育行政與治理：新管理主義途徑。臺北：學富文化。
陳鴻賢、許素艷（2002）。教育改革潮流中之家長教育選擇權。學校行政，20，
129-138。
陳麗珠（2000）。美國教育財政改革。臺北：五南。
陶穎，周莉，宋豔輝（2017）。知識域可視化中的共被引與耦合研究綜述。圖書
情報工作，11（61），140-148。
湯堯（2010）。教育市場化與行銷思維策略之案例分析探究。教育學誌，24，
157-176。
馮朝霖（2006）。另類教育與二十一世紀教育改革趨勢。研習資訊，23（3），5-12。
黃乃熒（2000）。父母選擇的教育改革意義。載於楊思偉（主編），家長學校選擇
權（3-36 頁）。臺北市：商鼎。
黃嘉雄（1998）。學校本位管理政策下教育機會均等策略──英國為例。載於中華
民國比較教育學會、中國教育學會（主編），社會變遷中的教育機會均等
（143-180 頁）。臺北市：揚智文化。
黃福，侯海燕，任佩麗、胡志剛（2018）。基於共被引與文獻耦合的研究前沿探
測方法遴選。情報雜誌，12（37），12-35。
蓋浙生（1993）。教育財政學。臺北：東華。
趙蓉英、許麗敏（2010）。文獻計量學發展演進與研究前沿的知識圖譜探析。中
國圖書館學報，5，60-68。
劉世閔、吳育偉（2004）。家長教育選擇權：教育公平與績效的雙刃劍。國民教
育研究學報，12，19-40。
劉盛博，張春博，丁堃，劉則淵（2013）。基於引用內容與位置的共被引分析改
進研究。情報學報，12（32），1248﹣1256。
鄭新輝（1997）。家長教育選擇權的可行性分析。初等教育學報，10，389-415。
戴曉霞（2002）。高等教育市場化：臺、港、中趨勢。臺北：高等教育。
顏妙芳（2005）。新優派哲學對英國教育政策的影響。網絡社會學通訊期刊，51。
取自http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/51/51-25.htm
顏秀如（2003）。教育市場化的省思與反思。學校行政，27，99-109。
英文部份
Abdulkadirolu, A., & Roth, P. A. (2009). Strategy-proofness versus efficiency in
matching with indifferences: redesigning the NYC High School
match. American Economic Review, 99(5), 1954-1978.
Addonizio, M. F. (2003). From fiscal equity to educational adequacy: lessons from
Michigan. Journal of Education Finance, 28(4), 457-483.
Angrist, J. D., Pathak, P. A., & Walters, C. R. (2013). Explaining charter school
effectiveness. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(4), 1-27.
Apple, M. W. (1996). Culture politics and education. NY: Teachers College of
Columbia University.
Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education. London: Routledge.
Ball, S. J. (2003). Class strategies and the education market. British Educational
Research Journal, 52(4), 433-436.
Bast, J. L., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Can parents choose the best schools for their
children? Economics of Education Review, 23(4), 431-440.
Batteson, C. H. (1999). The 1944 Education Act Reconsidered. Educational Review,
51, 5-15.
Betts, J. R., Lorien, A. Rice, Andrew, C. Zau., Cory, R. Koedel., & Emily,
Tang.(2006). Does School Choice Work? Effects on Student Integration and
Achievement. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California
Bifulco, R., & Ladd, H. F. (2007). School choice, racial segregation, and test‐score
gaps: Evidence from North Carolina`s charter school program. Journal of Policy
Analysis and Management, 26(1), 31-56.
Bifulco, R., Cobb, C. D., & Bell, C. (2009). Can interdistrict choice boost student
achievement? The case of Connecticut’s interdistrict magnet school
program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 323-345.
Blank, R. K. (1989). Educational effects of magnet high schools (G-00869000789).
Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED313469.pdf
Blank, R. K., Dentler, R. A., Baltzell, D. C., & Chabotar K. (1986). Survey of magnet
schools: analyzing a model of quality integrated education. James H. Lowey and
Associates, 14, 1-72.
Booker, K., Gilpatric, S., Gronberg, T., & Jansen, D. (2004). Charter school
performance in Texas. Journal of Public Economics, 31(5), 1-30.
Brathwaite, J. (2017).Neoliberal education reform and the perpetuation of inequality.
Critical Sociology, 43, 429-448.
Brennan, D. L. (2002). School choice and social justice. NY: Oxford University.
Broughman, B., Steven, P., & Kathleen, W. (2011). Characteristics of private schools
in the United States: Results from the 2003-2004 private school universe survey.
National Center for Education Statistics, 4, 90.
Burgess, S., Greaves, E., Vignoles, A., & Wilson, D. (2015). What parents want:
School preferences and school choice. The Economic Journal, 125(587),
1262-1289.
Buxton, C. A. (2005). Creating a culture of academic success in an urban science and
math magnet high school. Science Education, 89(3), 392-417.
Carl, J. (2001). Freedom of choice: Vouchers in America education. Santa Barbara,
CA: Praeger.
Chan, D., & Mok, K. H. (2001). Educational reforms and coping strategies under the
tidal wave of marketization: a comparative study of Hong Kong and mainland.
Comparative Education, 37(1), 21-41.
Che, Y. K., & Tercieux, O. (2018). Efficiency and stability in large matching markets.
Journal of Political Economy, 127(5), 2301-2342.
Cheng, A., Trivitt, J.R., & Wolf, P.J. (2016). School choice and the branding of
Milwaukee private schools. Social Science Quarterly, 97(2), 362–375.
Chiang, H. (2008). How accountability pressure on failing schools affects student
achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(9), 1045-1057.
Christenson, B., Eaton, M., Garet, M., Miller, L., Hikawa, H., & Dubois, P. (2003).
Evaluation of the Magnet School Assistance Program,1998 grantees (Rep.
2003-15). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED482977.pdf
Chubb, J, E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. DC:
Brookings.
Cohen, D. (2002) The religious factor in private education. Occasional Paper,53,23-71.
Crain, R., Allen, A., Thaler, R., Sullivan, D., Zellman, G. L., Little, J. W & Quigley,
D. D. (1999).The effect of academic career magnet schools on high schools and
their graduates. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational
Education.
Cullen, J. B., Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2005). The impact of school choice on
student outcomes: an analysis of the Chicago public schools. Journal of Public
Economics, 89(5), 729-760.
Daniels. N. (1989). Reading Rawls: Critical studies on Rawls’ A theory of juscice. CA:
Stanford University.
David, M., West, A., & Ribbens, J. (1994). Mother’s intuition? Choosing secondary
schools. London: Falmer.
Dawood, D. C. (2009). College readiness and academic successes for arts magnet and
traditional high school graduates. Disssertations & Theses Gradworks,
17(9),13-20.
Denis, D. P., & Levine, M.(1984). Magnet schools: choice and quality in public
education. Phi Delta Kappan, 66(4), 265-270.
Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. G. (2011). Are high-quality schools enough to increase
achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children’s Zone.
American Economic Journal, 3(2), 158-187.
Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. G. (2015). The medium-term impacts of high-achieving
charter schools on non-test score outcomes. Journal of Political Economy,
123(5), 985–1037.
Dronkers, J. (1995). The existence of parental choice in the Netherlands. Educational
Policy, 9(3), 227-243.
Engberg, J., Epple, D., Imbrogno, J., Sieg, H., & Zimmer, R. (2014). Evaluating
education programs that have lotteried admission and selective attrition. Journal
of Labor Economics, 32(1), 27-63.
Figlio, D., & Rouse, C. (2006). Do accountability and voucher threats improve low
performing schools? Journal of Public Economics, 90(1), 239-255.
Friedman, M, (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Gamoran, A. (1996). Student Achievement in Public Magnet, Public Comprehensive
and Private City High Schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy
Analysis, 18(1), 1–18.
Garfield, E. (2001). From bibliographic coupling to co-citation analysis via
algorithmic historio-bibliography. PA: Drexel University.
Gewirtz, S., Ball, S., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education.
UK: Open University
Gintis, H. (1995). The political economy of school choice. Teacher College Record,
96(3), 492-511.
Greene, J. P., Forster, G., &Winters, M. A. (2003). Apples to apples: An evaluation of
charter schools serving general student populations. Education Working Paper
Archive, 4, 1-19.
Halsey, A. H. (1997). Education-culture, economy, society. NY: Oxford U.P.
Hastings, J. S.(2002). Information, school choice, and academic achievement:
Evidence from two experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4),
1373-1414.
Henig, J. R., & John, F. W. (1995). Rethinking school choice: limits of the market
metaphor. American Political Science Association, 89(1), 205-220.
Holmes, G. M., DeSimone, J., & Rupp, N. G. (2006). Does school choice increase
school quality? Evidence from North Carolina charter schools. Improving School
Accountability, 14, 131-155.
Howell, W. G., Wolf, P. J., Campbell, D. E., & Peterson, P. E. (2002). School vouchers
and academic performance: results from three randomized field trials. Journal of
Policy Analysis and Management, 21(2), 191-217.
Hoxby, C. M. (2003). School choice and school competition: Evidence from the
United States. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 10, 9-65.
Hubert, M. (1999). The politics of school choice. NY: Rowman and Littlefield
Pubulishers.
John , F. (2000).The market approach to Education: An Analysis of America’s First
Voucher Program. NJ: Princeton University.
Joseph, K. (1976). Stranded on the middle ground. London: Center for policy studies.
Kelley, F. (2018). Subject to evaluation: how parents assess and mobilize information
from social networks in school choice. Social Forum, 34(1), 158-180.
Kimelberg, S. M., & Billingham, C. M. (2013). Attitudes toward diversity and the
school choice process: middle-class parents in a segregated urban public school
district. Urban Education, 48(2), 198-231.
Kojima, F. (2013). Matching with couples:stability and incentives in large markets.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(4), 1585-1786.
Kurata, R. (2017). Controlled school choice with soft bounds and overlapping
type. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 58, 153-184.
Laws, L. (1987). Assessing outcomes of magnet schools. Academic Achievement,
34,12.
Levin, H. (1976). Educational Opportunity and Social Inequality in Western
Europe. Social Problems, 24(2), 148-172.
Li, X., Ma, E., & Qu, H. (2017). Knowledge mapping of hospitality research- A
visual analysis using CiteSpace. International Journal of Hospitality
Management, 60, 77-93.
Manski, C. F. (1992). Educational choice (vouchers) and social mobility. Economics
of Education Review, 11(4), 351-369.
Marcotte, D., & Dalane, K. (2019). Socioeconomic segregation and school choice in
America public schools. Educational Research, 48(8),132-146.
Margaret, D. T. (1995). Concepts and issues in school choice. Lewiston, NY: Edwin
mellen.
Martinez, V., Thomas, K., & Kemerer, F. R. (1994).Who chooses and why: A look at
five school choice plans. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(9), 678.
McCully, D., & Malin, P. J. (2003). What parents think of New York’s charter schools
(CCI-R-37). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED477791.pdf
Miron, G., & Nelson, C.(2004). Student academic achievement in charter schools:
What we know and why we know so little. NY: Teacher College.
Nelson, J. L., Carlson, K., & Palonsky, S. B. (1996). Critical issues in education: A
dialectic approach. NY: McGraw-Hill College.
Pathak, P. A.(2011). The mechanism design approach to student assignment. Annual
Review of Economics, 3(1), 513-536.
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research front of JASIS 1986-1990.
Journal of American Society for Information Science, 45, 31-38.
Peters, B. G. (1996). The future of governing: Four emerging models. KS: University
Press of Kansus.
Peterson, P. E., Campbell, D. E., & West, M. R. (2002). Who chooses? Who uses?
Participation in a national school voucher program. Hill Hoover
Institution,1,51-84.
Plucker, J., Muller, P., Hansen, J., Ravert, R., & Makel, M. (2006). Evaluation of the
Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program. Director, 812, 855-4438.
Power, S., & Whitty, G. (1996). Teaching new subjects? The hidden curriculum of
marketised education systems. Critical Studies in Education, 37(2), 1-21.
Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510-515.
Ray, B. D. (1994). A nationwide study of home education in Canada: Family
characteristics, student achievement, and other topics. OR: NHERI Publications.
Raywid, M. A. (1984). Synthesis of Research on Schools of Choice. Educational
Leadership, 41(7), 70-78.
Rhea, A., & Regan, R. (2007). Magnet program review. Wake County Public School
System, Evaluation and Research Department, 6, 5-45.
Robert, B., & Helen, F. L. (2006). The impacts of charter schools on student
achievement: evidence from North Carolina. Education Finance and Policy, 1(1),
50-90.
Robert, B., & Helen, F. L. (2007). School choice, racial segregation, and test score
gaps: evidence from North Carolina`s charter school program. Journal of Policy
Analysis and Management, 21(1), 31-56.
Rolf, K. B. (1983). Survey of magnet schools: analyzing a model of quality integrated
education. Office of Planning, 14, 1-74.
Rouse, C. E. (1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation
of the Milwaukee parental choice program. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113,
553-602.
Sass, T. R. (2006). Charter school and student achievement in Florida. Education
Finance and Policy, 1(1), 91-122.
Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence
from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133–144.
doi:10.3102/ 01623737024002133
Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer
choice and the quality of American schools. NJ: Princeton University.
Silver, D., Saunders, M., & Zarate, E. (2008). What factors predict high school
graduation in the Los Angeles Unified School District. Policy Brief, 14, 15-23.
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the
relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813.
Smith, P. H., Arnot-Hopffer, E., Carmichael, C. M., Murphy, E., Valle, A., González,
N., & Poveda, A. (2002). Raise a child, not a test score: perspectives on bilingual
education at Davis Bilingual Magnet School. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(1),
103-121.
Sneyers, E., Vanhoof, J., & Mahieu, P. (2018). Primary teachers’ perceptions that
impact upon track recommendations regarding pupils’ enrolment in secondary
education: a path analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 1153–1173.
Sobel, R. S., & King, K. A. (2008). Does school choice increase the rate of youth
entrepreneurship? Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 429-438.
Solmon, L., Park, K., & Garcia, D. (2001). Does charter school attendance improve
test scores? Comments and Reactions on the Arizona Achievement Study.
Upjihn Institute Working Paper, 70, 1-12.
Sugarman, S. D., & Kenerer, F. R. (1999). School choice and social controversy:
politics, policy and law. DC: Brooking Institution Press.
Trivitt, J. R., & Wolf, P. J. (2011). School choice and the branding of Catholic
schools. Education Finance and Policy, 6(2), 202–245.
Vanourek, G. (2005). State of the charter school movement 2005: Trends, issues, and
indicators. DC: Charter School Leadership Council.
Walford, G. (1994). Choice and equity in education. London: Cassell.
Weiher, G. R. (2001). Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools
and household preferences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,
21(1),79-92.
Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: the
school, the state and the market. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 24-36.
Witte, J. F., Sterr, T. D., & Thorn, C. A. (1995). Fifth year report: Milwaukee
parental choice program. WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Witte, J. F. (1996). Who chooses? Voucher and interdistrict choice programs in
Milwaukee. American Journal of Education, 104(3), 186–217.		zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202001100en_US