學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 跨越邊界：論《使女的故事》中的空間敘事
Crossing the Boundaries: The Spatial Theory in The Handmaid’s Tale作者 謝明儒
Hsieh, Ming-Ju貢獻者 楊麗敏
Yang, Li-Min
謝明儒
Hsieh, Ming-Ju關鍵詞 《使女的故事》
《空間的生產》
瑪格麗特・愛特伍
昂希·列斐伏爾
The Handmaid’s Tale
Margaret Atwood
Henri Lefebvre
The Production of space
spatial practice
representations of spaces
representational spaces日期 2020 上傳時間 2-Sep-2020 11:34:07 (UTC+8) 摘要 本論文旨在討論瑪格麗特・愛特伍的小說《使女的故事》中的「空間實踐」，「空間再現」，以及「再現空間」。本文藉由空間理論社會學家昂希·列斐伏爾《空間的生產》一書提出的空間三元論，檢視《使女故事中》的空間架構。本文第一章為緒論，介紹瑪格麗特・愛特伍的寫作理論以及創作背景，此外提出了當代關於愛特伍小說的反烏托邦文類之探討，並檢視小說敘事中呈現的現代及後現代性。本文第二章介紹了昂希·列斐伏爾的空間三元論如何定義空間的生產。本章檢視《使女的故事》中女主人公的敘事，如何建構的空間實踐，以及探討愛特伍呈現在基列國空間再現。 本論文的第三張檢視了昂希·列斐伏爾空間三元的最後一環，「再現空間」如何透過《使女的故事》裡的角色中的日常生活，再現並重新建構空間。透過重現日常生活的敘事及論述，本文總結基列國的空間源由空間中的居住者生產，製造，並重建。
The thesis aims to adapt Lefebvre’s spatial triad so as to examine the space produced in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. The Handmaid’s Tale fictionalizes the coup d`état overthrows the United States and constructs the theocratic government of Gilead. The history of the Early Gileadean Era is recorded in the tapes of the protagonist, the handmaid Offred. The study focuses on the oral records that reveal the landscape of the city, the construction of the regime, and the everyday life of the individuals. Applying Lefebvre’s spatial triad, the thesis targets on the representations of the space “perceived” by the viewers, “conceived” by the government, and “lived” by the inhabitants. Chapter one provides the introductory literature survey on Atwood’s novel, including feminist, postmodernist, and dystopian critiques. Based on the analysis of Lefebvre’s spatial theory, chapter two aims to explore the “physical” space of the Republic of Gilead. This chapter targets on spatial practice of the regime represented in city planning, buildings, and physical landscape. Following the analysis on spatial practice, the chapter advances to the conceived space in the representations of spaces of Gilead, exploring conceptualized codes and signs. Emphasizing on the space “lived” by Gilead’s civilians, chapter three embodies representational spaces of Gilead that is constructed and reconstructed by its actual inhabitants and users. Thus, I draw to the conclusion that what constructs Gilead is not the political power, but the ways of living among all habitants dwelling in that space.參考文獻 Atwood, Margaret. The Handmaids Tale. Anchor Books, 2017.---. “The Handmaid`s Tale and Oryx and Crake in Context.” PMLA, vol.119, no.3, May. 2004, pp. 513-517.Auerbach, Nina. “Introduction: Women and Nations.” Tulsa Studies in Women`s Literature, vol. 6, no. 2, 1987, pp. 181–188.Baccolini, Raffaella. “The Persistence of Hope in Dystopian Science Fiction.” PMLA, vol. 119, no. 3, 2004, pp. 518–521.Becker, Manuel Benjamin. Forms and Functions of Dystopia in Margaret Atwood’s Novels. Verlag Dr. Müller, 2008.Burack, Cynthia. “Bringing Women`s Studies to Political Science: The Handmaid in the Classroom.” NWSA Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, 1988, pp. 274–283.Castells, Manuel. The Urban Questions. The MIT Press, 1977.Davies, Madeleine. “Margaret Atwood’s Female Bodies.” The Companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge UP, 2006, pp. 58–71.Dodson, Danita J. “‘We Lived in the Blank White Spaces’: Rewriting the Paradigm of Denial in Atwood`s The Handmaid`s Tale.” Utopian Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, 1997, pp. 66–86.Ehrenreich, Barbara. “Feminism and Religious Fundamentalism Merge in The Handmaid’s Tale.” Women’s Issues in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by Elizabeth Des Chenes et al., Greenhaven Press, 2012, pp. 17-27.Filipczak, Dorota. “Is There A Balm in Gilead? —Biblical Intertext in The Handmaid’s Tale.” Literature and Theology, vol. 7, no. 2, 1993, pp. 171–185.Goldblatt, Patricia F. “Reconstructing Margaret Atwood`s Protagonists.” World Literature Today, vol. 73, no. 2, 1999, pp. 275–282.Gottdiener, Mark. The Social Production of Urban Space. Texas UP, 1994.Grace, Dominick M. “The Handmaid`s Tale: ‘Historical Notes’ and Documentary Subversion.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 25, no. 3, 1998, pp. 481–494.Hammer, Stephanie Barbé. “The World as It Will Be? Female Satire and the Technology of Power in The Handmaid`s Tale.” Modern Language Studies, vol. 20, no. 2, 1990, pp. 39–49.Hansot, Elizabeth. “Selves, Survival, and Resistance in The Handmaid`s Tale.” Utopian Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, 1994, pp. 56–69.Harvey, David. Social Justice and the City. Revised ed., University of Georgia Press, 1973.Hengen, Shannon. “‘Metaphysical Romance’: Atwood`s PhD Thesis and The Handmaid`s Tale.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 18, no. 1, 1991, pp. 154–156.Howells, Coral Ann. Private and Fictional Worlds: Canadian Women Novelists of the 1970s and 1980s. London: Methuen, 1987.---. “Margaret Atwood’s Dystopian Visions: The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge UP,2006.Ingersoll, Earl G., editor. Margaret Atwood: Conversations, Virago, 1992.Jones, Libby Falk. “Breaking Silences in Feminist Dystopias.” Utopian Studies, no. 3, 1991, pp. 7–11.Kauffman, Linda. “Special Delivery. Twenty-first Century Epistolary in The Handmaid’s Tale.” Writing the Female Voice: Essays on Epistolary Literature, edited by Elizabeth C. Goldsmith et al., Northeastern UP, 1989, pp. 221-244.Ketterer, David. “Margaret Atwood`s The Handmaid`s Tale: A Contextual Dystopia.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, 1989, pp. 209–217.Klarer, Mario. “Orality and Literacy as Gender-Supporting Structures in Margaret Atwood’s ‘The Handmaid`s Tale.’” Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, vol. 28, no. 4, 1995, pp. 129–142.Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Blackwell, 1991.Mohr, Dunja M. Worlds Apart? Dualism and Transgression in Contemporary Female Dystopias, edited by Donald E. Palumbo et al., McFarland & Company, 2005.Murphy, Patrick D. “Reducing the Dystopian Distance: Pseudo-Documentary Framing in Near-Future Fiction.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, 1990, pp. 25–40.Myrsiades, Linda. “CHAPTER ELEVEN: Law, Medicine, and the Sex Slave in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid`s Tale.” Counterpoints, vol. 121, 1999, pp. 219–245.Rao, Eleonora. Strategies for Identity: The Fiction of Margaret Atwood. Peter Lang, 1993.Reesman, Jeanne Campbell. “Dark Knowledge in ‘The Handmaid`s Tale.’” CEA Critic, vol. 53, no. 3, 1991, pp. 6–22.Shields, Rob. Lefebvre, Love and Struggle: Spatial Dialectics. Routledge, 1999.---. “Spatial Stress and Resistance: Social Meanings of Spatialization.”Space and Social Theory, edited by Georges Benko and Ulf Strohmayer, Blackwell, 1997, pp.33-186.Somacarrera Pilar. “Power Politics/Power Politics: Atwood and Foucault.” Margaret Atwood: The Open Eye, edited by John Moss and Tobi Kozakewich, University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, 2006, pp. 291–304.Stanek, Lukasz. Henri Lefebvre on Space. Minnesota UP, 2011.Stein, Karen F. “Margaret Atwood`s Modest Proposal: The Handmaid`s Tale.” Canadian Literature, vol. 148, Spring, 1994, pp. 57-73.Stillman, Peter G., and S. Anne Johnson. “Identity, Complicity, and Resistance in The Handmaid`s Tale.” Utopian Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, 1994, pp. 70–86.Thompson, Lee Briscoe. “The Life of Margaret Atwood.” Women’s Issues in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by Elizabeth Des Chenes., Greenhaven Press, 2012, pp. 17-27.Thomas, P. L. Reading, Learning, Teaching Margaret Atwood. Peter Lang, 2007.Vevaina, Coomi S. “Margaret Atwood and History.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge UP, 2006, pp.86-99Zieleniec, Andrzej J. L. Space and Social Theory. SAGE, 2000. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
104551004資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104551004 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 楊麗敏 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Yang, Li-Min en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 謝明儒 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsieh, Ming-Ju en_US dc.creator (作者) 謝明儒 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Hsieh, Ming-Ju en_US dc.date (日期) 2020 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Sep-2020 11:34:07 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Sep-2020 11:34:07 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Sep-2020 11:34:07 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0104551004 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131440 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 104551004 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本論文旨在討論瑪格麗特・愛特伍的小說《使女的故事》中的「空間實踐」，「空間再現」，以及「再現空間」。本文藉由空間理論社會學家昂希·列斐伏爾《空間的生產》一書提出的空間三元論，檢視《使女故事中》的空間架構。本文第一章為緒論，介紹瑪格麗特・愛特伍的寫作理論以及創作背景，此外提出了當代關於愛特伍小說的反烏托邦文類之探討，並檢視小說敘事中呈現的現代及後現代性。本文第二章介紹了昂希·列斐伏爾的空間三元論如何定義空間的生產。本章檢視《使女的故事》中女主人公的敘事，如何建構的空間實踐，以及探討愛特伍呈現在基列國空間再現。 本論文的第三張檢視了昂希·列斐伏爾空間三元的最後一環，「再現空間」如何透過《使女的故事》裡的角色中的日常生活，再現並重新建構空間。透過重現日常生活的敘事及論述，本文總結基列國的空間源由空間中的居住者生產，製造，並重建。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The thesis aims to adapt Lefebvre’s spatial triad so as to examine the space produced in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. The Handmaid’s Tale fictionalizes the coup d`état overthrows the United States and constructs the theocratic government of Gilead. The history of the Early Gileadean Era is recorded in the tapes of the protagonist, the handmaid Offred. The study focuses on the oral records that reveal the landscape of the city, the construction of the regime, and the everyday life of the individuals. Applying Lefebvre’s spatial triad, the thesis targets on the representations of the space “perceived” by the viewers, “conceived” by the government, and “lived” by the inhabitants. Chapter one provides the introductory literature survey on Atwood’s novel, including feminist, postmodernist, and dystopian critiques. Based on the analysis of Lefebvre’s spatial theory, chapter two aims to explore the “physical” space of the Republic of Gilead. This chapter targets on spatial practice of the regime represented in city planning, buildings, and physical landscape. Following the analysis on spatial practice, the chapter advances to the conceived space in the representations of spaces of Gilead, exploring conceptualized codes and signs. Emphasizing on the space “lived” by Gilead’s civilians, chapter three embodies representational spaces of Gilead that is constructed and reconstructed by its actual inhabitants and users. Thus, I draw to the conclusion that what constructs Gilead is not the political power, but the ways of living among all habitants dwelling in that space. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Acknowledgement iiiChinese Abstract viiEnglish Abstract ixChapter One: Introduction1.1 General Background and Information 11.2 Literature Review: Postmodernist and Feminist Reading of Atwood’s Novels 21.3 Literature Review: Dystopian Discussions on The Handmaid’s Tale 61.4 Methodology: Lefebvre’s Spatial Triad 10Chapter Two: Spatial Practice and Representations of Spaces in the Republic of Gilead2.1 Lefebvre’s Spatial Theory 152.2 Spatial Practice Presented in the Republic of Gilead 172.3 Representations of Gilead’s Public Urban Space 202.4 Space of Gileadean Inhabitants 282.5 Conclusion 30Chapter Three: Representational Spaces of Gilead3.1 Representational Spaces in Lefebvre’s Spatial Triad. 323.2 Representational Spaces in Offred’s Room: Freedom and Coercion 343.3 Rebellions and Resistance in the Lived Gilead’s Space 393.4 Frontal and Clandestine Relations in Representational Spaces of Gilead 413.5 Conclusion 48Chapter Four: Conclusion 50Works Cited 52 zh_TW dc.format.extent 927974 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104551004 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 《使女的故事》 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 《空間的生產》 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 瑪格麗特・愛特伍 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 昂希·列斐伏爾 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) The Handmaid’s Tale en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Margaret Atwood en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Henri Lefebvre en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) The Production of space en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) spatial practice en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) representations of spaces en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) representational spaces en_US dc.title (題名) 跨越邊界：論《使女的故事》中的空間敘事 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Crossing the Boundaries: The Spatial Theory in The Handmaid’s Tale en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Atwood, Margaret. The Handmaids Tale. Anchor Books, 2017.---. “The Handmaid`s Tale and Oryx and Crake in Context.” PMLA, vol.119, no.3, May. 2004, pp. 513-517.Auerbach, Nina. “Introduction: Women and Nations.” Tulsa Studies in Women`s Literature, vol. 6, no. 2, 1987, pp. 181–188.Baccolini, Raffaella. “The Persistence of Hope in Dystopian Science Fiction.” PMLA, vol. 119, no. 3, 2004, pp. 518–521.Becker, Manuel Benjamin. Forms and Functions of Dystopia in Margaret Atwood’s Novels. Verlag Dr. Müller, 2008.Burack, Cynthia. “Bringing Women`s Studies to Political Science: The Handmaid in the Classroom.” NWSA Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, 1988, pp. 274–283.Castells, Manuel. The Urban Questions. The MIT Press, 1977.Davies, Madeleine. “Margaret Atwood’s Female Bodies.” The Companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge UP, 2006, pp. 58–71.Dodson, Danita J. “‘We Lived in the Blank White Spaces’: Rewriting the Paradigm of Denial in Atwood`s The Handmaid`s Tale.” Utopian Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, 1997, pp. 66–86.Ehrenreich, Barbara. “Feminism and Religious Fundamentalism Merge in The Handmaid’s Tale.” Women’s Issues in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by Elizabeth Des Chenes et al., Greenhaven Press, 2012, pp. 17-27.Filipczak, Dorota. “Is There A Balm in Gilead? —Biblical Intertext in The Handmaid’s Tale.” Literature and Theology, vol. 7, no. 2, 1993, pp. 171–185.Goldblatt, Patricia F. “Reconstructing Margaret Atwood`s Protagonists.” World Literature Today, vol. 73, no. 2, 1999, pp. 275–282.Gottdiener, Mark. The Social Production of Urban Space. Texas UP, 1994.Grace, Dominick M. “The Handmaid`s Tale: ‘Historical Notes’ and Documentary Subversion.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 25, no. 3, 1998, pp. 481–494.Hammer, Stephanie Barbé. “The World as It Will Be? Female Satire and the Technology of Power in The Handmaid`s Tale.” Modern Language Studies, vol. 20, no. 2, 1990, pp. 39–49.Hansot, Elizabeth. “Selves, Survival, and Resistance in The Handmaid`s Tale.” Utopian Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, 1994, pp. 56–69.Harvey, David. Social Justice and the City. Revised ed., University of Georgia Press, 1973.Hengen, Shannon. “‘Metaphysical Romance’: Atwood`s PhD Thesis and The Handmaid`s Tale.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 18, no. 1, 1991, pp. 154–156.Howells, Coral Ann. Private and Fictional Worlds: Canadian Women Novelists of the 1970s and 1980s. London: Methuen, 1987.---. “Margaret Atwood’s Dystopian Visions: The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge UP,2006.Ingersoll, Earl G., editor. Margaret Atwood: Conversations, Virago, 1992.Jones, Libby Falk. “Breaking Silences in Feminist Dystopias.” Utopian Studies, no. 3, 1991, pp. 7–11.Kauffman, Linda. “Special Delivery. Twenty-first Century Epistolary in The Handmaid’s Tale.” Writing the Female Voice: Essays on Epistolary Literature, edited by Elizabeth C. Goldsmith et al., Northeastern UP, 1989, pp. 221-244.Ketterer, David. “Margaret Atwood`s The Handmaid`s Tale: A Contextual Dystopia.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, 1989, pp. 209–217.Klarer, Mario. “Orality and Literacy as Gender-Supporting Structures in Margaret Atwood’s ‘The Handmaid`s Tale.’” Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, vol. 28, no. 4, 1995, pp. 129–142.Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Blackwell, 1991.Mohr, Dunja M. Worlds Apart? Dualism and Transgression in Contemporary Female Dystopias, edited by Donald E. Palumbo et al., McFarland & Company, 2005.Murphy, Patrick D. “Reducing the Dystopian Distance: Pseudo-Documentary Framing in Near-Future Fiction.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, 1990, pp. 25–40.Myrsiades, Linda. “CHAPTER ELEVEN: Law, Medicine, and the Sex Slave in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid`s Tale.” Counterpoints, vol. 121, 1999, pp. 219–245.Rao, Eleonora. Strategies for Identity: The Fiction of Margaret Atwood. Peter Lang, 1993.Reesman, Jeanne Campbell. “Dark Knowledge in ‘The Handmaid`s Tale.’” CEA Critic, vol. 53, no. 3, 1991, pp. 6–22.Shields, Rob. Lefebvre, Love and Struggle: Spatial Dialectics. Routledge, 1999.---. “Spatial Stress and Resistance: Social Meanings of Spatialization.”Space and Social Theory, edited by Georges Benko and Ulf Strohmayer, Blackwell, 1997, pp.33-186.Somacarrera Pilar. “Power Politics/Power Politics: Atwood and Foucault.” Margaret Atwood: The Open Eye, edited by John Moss and Tobi Kozakewich, University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, 2006, pp. 291–304.Stanek, Lukasz. Henri Lefebvre on Space. Minnesota UP, 2011.Stein, Karen F. “Margaret Atwood`s Modest Proposal: The Handmaid`s Tale.” Canadian Literature, vol. 148, Spring, 1994, pp. 57-73.Stillman, Peter G., and S. Anne Johnson. “Identity, Complicity, and Resistance in The Handmaid`s Tale.” Utopian Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, 1994, pp. 70–86.Thompson, Lee Briscoe. “The Life of Margaret Atwood.” Women’s Issues in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by Elizabeth Des Chenes., Greenhaven Press, 2012, pp. 17-27.Thomas, P. L. Reading, Learning, Teaching Margaret Atwood. Peter Lang, 2007.Vevaina, Coomi S. “Margaret Atwood and History.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge UP, 2006, pp.86-99Zieleniec, Andrzej J. L. Space and Social Theory. SAGE, 2000. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202001555 en_US
