| dc.contributor | 政治大學哲學學報 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 李國揚 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | Lee, Kok Yong | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2020-01 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 12-Nov-2020 15:59:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 12-Nov-2020 15:59:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 12-Nov-2020 15:59:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132531 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Several authors have recently argued against intellectualism, the view that one`s epistemic position with respect to p depends exclusively on one`s truth-relevant factors with respect to p. In this paper, I first examine two prominent arguments for the anti-intellectualist position and find both of them wanting. More precisely, I argue that these arguments, by themselves, are underdetermined between intellectualism and anti-intellectualism. I then manifest the intuitive plausibility of intellectualism by examining the ordinary conversational pattern of challenging a claim. | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 根據智性主義（intellectualism），影響S對p的認知地位（epistemic position）的因素，只能是與p是否為真相關的因素（truth-relevant factor）。近年來，有不少的哲學家對智性主義提出強而有力的反對論證。本文將探討其中兩個重要的反對論證。筆者主張，這兩個論證其實並沒有辦法證明，非智性主義比智性主義更合理。並且，通過檢視日常語言中，挑戰一個宣稱（challenging a claim）的語言資料（linguistic data），筆者將說明智性主義是非常符合一般人的直覺的。 | |
| dc.format.extent | 554848 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 政治大學哲學學報, 43, 35-67 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Intellectualism ; Epistemic Pragmatism ; Pragmatic Encroachment ; Pragmatic Penetration ; Interest-Relative Invariantism ; the Nature of Knowledge | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 智性主義 ; 知性實用主義 ; 實用入侵主義 ; 實用穿透主義 ; 利益相對不變主義 ; 知識的本質 | |
| dc.title (題名) | On Two Recent Arguments against Intellectualism | |
| dc.title (題名) | 論最近兩個反對智性主義的論證 | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.30393/TNCUP.202001_(43).0002 | |
| dc.doi.uri (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202001_(43).0002 | |
