學術產出-學位論文
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 ⾹港與台灣的奢侈品商標保護之比較研究
The Institutional Issues of Luxury Counterfeits: The Cases of Hong Kong and Taiwan作者 薛芬妮
Laurette, GUINOT Fanny貢獻者 陳宗文
Chen, Tzung-Wen
薛芬妮
GUINOT Fanny Laurette關鍵詞 奢侈
香港
臺灣
假冒
Luxury
Counterfeit
Trademark
Taiwan
Hong Kong
institutions日期 2021 上傳時間 2-Mar-2021 14:50:50 (UTC+8) 摘要 贗品無處不在,無論在哪裡,這些假冒產品都獲得了越來越多的成功。但是,亞洲尤其受影響。確實,中國無疑是假貨的生產地,⽽香港在產品到達最終⽬的地(例如台灣)無疑是重要的商品過境地。通過對台灣和香港的現象進行比較,這是對該地區的深入研究。針對是從行為者,⾏動水平還是在政策上,假冒都是全球性問題。因此,有必要檢驗這些不同政黨在反恐鬥爭中製定的不同策略,以便考慮可能的替代方案,以便更好地理解問題。在這裡,我們將針對這種現象和將要採取的政策提出整體方法,並對歐洲案例進⾏研究,以此作為採取這些策略的基礎。
Copies are legion and there is a growing success for these fake products, no matter where. However, Asia is particularly affected. Indeed, China is undoubtedly the workshop of fakes and Hong Kong an important transit zone for products, before they reach their final destination, such as Taiwan. This will be an in-depth examination of the region through a comparison of the phenomenon in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Counterfeiting is a global problem, both in terms of actors, levels of action and policies; it is therefore essential to examine the different strategies developed by these different parties in the fight against counterfeiting in order to consider the possible alternatives for a better understanding of the issue.We will propose here a holistic approach to the phenomenon and the policies to be put in place, as well as a study of the European case as a basis for approaching these strategies.參考文獻 ReferencesAkerlof. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” TheQuarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.Albers-Miller, and Nancy. 1999. “Consumer Misbehavior: Why People Buy Illicit Goods.” Journalof Consumer Marketing 16 (3).Ang et al. 2001. “Spot the Difference: Consumer Responses towards Counterfeits.” Journal ofConsumer Marketing.Arellano. 1994. “Informal-Underground Retailers in Less-Developed Countries: An ExploratoryResearch from a Marketing Point of View.” Journal of Macromarketing 14 (2): 21–35.Bach. 2004. “The Double Punch of Law and Technology: Fighting Music Piracy or Re-MakingCopyright in a Digital Age?” Business and Politics 6 (2): 1–35.Badie, Bernard, and Dominique Vidal. 2017. Un Monde d’inégalités. La Découverte.Balkin, and Shepherd. 2004. “Piracy as Strategy? A Reexamination of Product Piracy.” WorkingPaper Economia. Instituto de Empresa, Madrid.Bearden, William, and Etzel. 1982. “Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand PurchaseDecisions.” Journal of Consumer Research 9 (2).Berman. 2006. “Developing an Effective Customer Loyalty Program.” California ManagementReview 49 (1).———. 2008. “Strategies to Detect and Reduce Counterfeiting Activity.” Journal of Brand Management.Bernoux, Pierre. 1985. Sociologie Des Organisations. Initiation Théorique Suivie de Douze CasPratiques. Points.Bloch, Bush, and Campbell. 1993. “Consumer ‘Accomplices’ in Product Counterfeiting.” Journalof Consumer Marketing 10 (4): 27–33.Bosworth, David. 2006a. Counterfeiting and Piracy: The State of the Art. Working paper. IntellectualProperty Research Centre, St Peter’s College, Oxford.———. 2006b. “Counterfeiting and Piracy: The State of the Art.” Working paper. IntellectualProperty Research Centre, St Peter’s College, Oxford.Bouglé. 1909. La Démocratie Devant La Science. Études Critiques Sur l’hérédité, La Concurrenceet La Différenciation,. Félix Alcan. Paris.Bourdieu, Pierre. 1980. Questions de Sociologie. Editions de Minuit.———. 1994. Raisons Pratiques: Sur La Théorie de l’action. Seuil. Paris.Burawoy. 1992. “The Extended Case Method.” In . Cambridge University Press.Bush, Bloch, and Dawson. 1989. “Remedies for Product Counterfeiting.” Business Horizons 32(1): 59–65.Bushman. 1993. “What’s in a Name? The Moderating Role of Public Self-Consciousness on theRelation between Brand Label and Brand Preference.” Journal of Applied Psychology 78(5).Buton. 2010. “Histoires d’institutions. Réflexions Sur l’historicité Des Faits Institutionnels.”Raisons Politiques 4 (40).Cademan, Arvid, and Dan Halvarsson. 2012. “The Affect of Counterfeit Products on LuxuryBrands,” 84.Cappelen, Ådne, Nils Petter Gleditsch, and Olav Bjerkholt. 1984. “Military Spending and EconomicGrowth in the OECD Countries.” Journal of Peace Research 21 (4).Cesareo, Pastore, and Williams. 2017a. “Chapter 9.” In Handbook of Research on Counterfeitingand Illicit Trade. Peggy E. Chaudhry.———. 2017b. “Counterfeiting Luxury Goods.” Handbook of Research on Counterfeiting andIllicit Trade. Edward Elgar Publishing.Chadha, Radha, and Paul Husband. 2006. The Cult of the Luxury Brand: Inside Asia’s Love Affairwith Luxury. Nicholas Brealey International.Chan. 2016. “Protecting and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in China.” Partnering Perspectives,no. Fall.Chaty, Lionel. 1999. Elements Pratique Pour l’analyse Des Institutions. PUF. La méthode enActes.Chaudhry. 2006. “Managing Intellectual Property Rights: Government Tactics to Curtail CounterfeitTrade.” European Business Law Review 17 (4): 939–58.Chaudhry, Cordell, and Zimmerman. 2005. “Modeling Anti-Counterfeiting Strategies in Responseto Protecting Intellectual Property Rights in a Global Environment.” The MarketingReview 5 (1): 59–72.Chaudhry, and Walsh. 1996. “An Assessment of the Impact of Counterfeiting in InternationalMarkets: The Paradox Persists.” Columbia Journal of World Business 31 (3): 34–48.Chaudhry, and Zimmerman. 2009. The Economics of Counterfeit Trade: Governments, Consumers,Pirates and Intellectual Property Rights. Springer Science&Business Media.Chaudhry, Zimmerman, Peters, and Cordell. 2008. “Preserving Intellectual Property Rights: ManagerialInsight into the Escalating Counterfeit Market Quandary.” Journal of BusinessHorizons 52: 57–66.———. 2009. “Preserving Intellectual Property Rights: Managerial Insight into the EscalatingCounterfeit Market Quandary.” Business Horizons 52 (1).Clark. 2006. “Counterfeiting in China: A Blueprint for Change.” The China Business Review, no.January/February: 9–46.Crozier, Michel. 1963. Le Phénomène Bureaucratique, Essai Sur Les Tendances BureaucratiquesDes Systèmes d’organisation Modernes et Sur Leur Relation En France Avec Le SystèmeSocial et Culturel. Editions du Seuil. Paris.Danchev. 2009. On Art and War and Terror. Edimburgh Univeristy Press Ltd.“Développement.” n.d.Dimitrov. 2009. Piracy and the State, The Politics of Intellectual Property Rights in China.Cambridge University Press.Dion. 1993. “Erhard Friedberg et l’analyse Stratégique.” Revue Française de Science Politique43 (6).Douglas, Mary. 1978. “Cultural Bias.” Occasional paper no. 35. London, Royal AnthropologicalInstitute of Great Britain and Ireland.———. 1990. “La Connaissance de Soi.” Revue Du MAUSS, no. 8.———. 1999. Comment Pensent Les Institutions. La Découverte-MAUSS. Paris.———. 2004. Comment Pensent Les Institutions. La Découverte.Dubois, and Duquesne. 1993. “The Market for Luxury Goods: Income versus Culture.” EuropeanJournal of Marketing.Dubois, and Paternault. 1995. “Observations: Understanding the World of International LuxuryBrands: The Dream Formula.” Journal of Advertising Research 35 (4): 69–75.Durkheim, Emile. 1983a. Pragmatism and Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.———. 1983b. Préface à La Seconde Edition, Les Règles de La Méthode Sociologique. 21st ed.Paris: PUF.———. 2013. Les Règles de La Méthode Sociologique. Presses Electroniques de France.Eisend, Marin, and Pakize Schuchert-Güler. 2006. “Explaining Counterfeit Purchases: A Reviewand Preview.” Academy of Marketing Science Review.Farraj, Aisha. 2015. “The Third-Shift Problem in China: The First Step Is Admitting You Have aProblem.” Law School Student Scholarship, paper 779.Fauconnet, Paul, and Marcel Mauss. 1901. “Sociologie.” In Grande Encyclopédie, 30:165–75.Le Sens Commun. Paris.Felstiner, Abel, and Sarat. 1980. “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming,Claiming, Blaming.” Law and Society Review 15 (3/4).Flynn, Goldsmith, and Eastman. 1996. “Opinion Leaders and Opinion Seekers: Two New MeasurementScales.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24 (2).Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et Punir. Paris: Gallimard.Gentry et al. 2006. “The Effects of Counterfeiting on Consumer Search.” Journal of ConsumerBehaviour: An International Research Review 5 (3): 245–56.Gentry, Sanjay, Shultz, and Suraj. 2001. “How Now Ralph Lauren? The Separation of Brand andProduct in a Counterfeit Culture.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 29 (6):258–65.Globerman. 1988. “Addressing International Product Piracy.” Journal of International BusinessStudies 19 (3): 497–504.Goffman. 1968. Asiles. Etudes Sur La Condition Sociale Des Malades Mentaux. Présentation deRobert Castel, Traduction Française. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Green, and Smith. 2002. “Executive Insights: Countering Brand Counterfeiters.” Journal of InternationalMarketing 10 (4): 89–106.Grémion, Pierre. 1976. Le Pouvoir Périphérique. Le Seuil.Grossman, and Shapiro. 1988a. “Counterfeit-Product Trade.” American Economic Review 78 (1):59–75.———. 1988b. “Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 103(1): 79–100.Hansen. 1978. “The Capital of Counterfeiting.” Dun’s Review.Harvey. 1987. “Industrial Product Counterfeiting: Problems and Proposed Solutions.” The Journalof Business & Industrial Marketing 2 (4): 5–14.———. 1988. “A New Way to Combat Product Counterfeiting.” Business Horizons 31 (4): 19–28.Harvey, and Ronkainen. 1985. “International Counterfeiters: Marketing Success without the Costand the Risk.” Columbia Journal of World Business 20 (3): 37–45.Harvey, and Walls. 2003. “Laboratory Markets in Counterfeit Goods: Hong Kong versus Las Vegas.”Applied Economics Letters 10 (14): 883–87.Hetzler. 2002. “Godfathers and Pirates: Counterfeiting and Organized Crime.” European Journalof Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 10 (4): 303–20.Hill, and Varone. 2017. The Public Policy Process. 7th ed. Routledge.Hilton, Choi, and Chen. 2004. “The Ethics of Counterfeiting in the Fashion Industry: Quality,Credence and Profit Issues.” Journal of Business Ethics 55 (4): 343–52.Hung. 2003. “The Business of Product Counterfeiting in China and the Post-WTO MembershipEnvironment.” Asia Pacific Business Review 10 (1): 58–77.Husted. 2000. “The Impact of National Culture on Software Piracy.” Journal of Business Ethics26 (3): 197–211.Jacobs, Samli, and Jedlik. 2001. “The Nightmare of International Product Piracy – Exploring DefensiveStrategies.” Industrial Marketing Management 30 (6): 499–509.Jain. 1996. “Problems in International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights.” Journal of InternationalMarketing 4 (1): 9–32.Javorcik. 2004. “The Composition of Foreign Direct Investment and Protection of IntellectualProperty Rights: Evidence from Transition Economies.” European Economic Review 48(1): 39–62.Kaikati, and LaGarce. 1980. “Beware of International Brand Piracy.” Harvard Business Review58 (2): 52–58.Kapferer, Jean-Noël. 2015. Kapferer on Luxury: How Luxury Brands Can Grow Yet RemainRare. Kogan Page.Kapferer, Jean-Noël, and Michaut. 2014. “Luxury Counterfeit Purchasing: The Collateral Effectof Luxury Brands’ Trading down Policy.” Journal of Brand Strategy 3 (1): 59–70.Krechevsky. 2000. “The Multinational Approach to Anti-Counterfeiting.” The Journal of ProprietaryRights 12 (9): 1–12.Lai, and Zaichkowsky. 1999. “Brand Imitation: Do the Chinese Have Different Views?” AsiaPacific Journal of Management 16 (2).Lascu, and Zinkhan. 1999. “Consumer Conformity: Review and Applications for MarketingTheory and Practice.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 7 (3).“L’attrait.” n.d.Ledent, David. 2007. “Sociologie et Sociétés, 2004, 36 (2). Présences de Marcel Mauss: Éd. ParMarcel Fournier & Jean-Christophe Marcel. Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal,272 p.” L’Homme, no. 181 (February). https://doi.org/10.4000/lhomme.3013.Liebowitz. 1985. “Copying and Indirect Appropriability: Photocopying Journals.” Journal of PoliticalEconomy 93 (5): 945–57.———. 2005. “Economists’ Topsy-Turvy View of Piracy.” Review of Economic Research onCopyright Issues 2 (1): 5–17.Lin, and Chen. n.d. “Taiwan: Trade Mark Laws and Regulations 2020.” Accessed November 30,2020. ICLG.com, https://iclg.com/practice-areas/trade-marks-laws-and-regulations/taiwan.“LVMH, de l’art de la guerre contre la contrefaçon.” 2016a. Infoguerre (blog). February 15,2016. https://infoguerre.fr/2016/02/lvmh-de-l%e2%80%99art-de-la-guerre-contre-lacontrefacon/.“———.” 2016b. Infoguerre (blog). February 15, 2016. https://infoguerre.fr/2016/02/lvmh-de-l%e2%80%99art-de-la-guerre-contre-la-contrefacon/.Marron, Donald, and Steel. 2000. “Which Countries Protect Intellectual Property? The Case ofSoftware Piracy.” Economic Inquiry 38 (2).Mauss, Marcel. 1969. Oeuvres. 3. Cohésion Sociale et Division de La Sociologie. Paris: Les Éditionsde Minuit.McCracken. 1986. “Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movementof the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods.” Journal of Consumer Research 13(1).Mendonça, Pereira, and Godinho. 2004. “Trademarks as an Indicator of Innovation and IndustrialChange.” Research Policy 33 (9): 1385–1404.Mill, John Stuart. 2011. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. 1 vols. Cambridge UniversityPress.Millard. 1995. “Hauriou et La Théorie de l’institution.” Droit et Société, no. 30/31.Miller, Karen. 2013. “Hedonic Customer Responses to Fast Fashion and Replicas.” Journal ofFashion Marketing and Management 17 (May). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-10-2011-0072.Mitchell, V.-W., and Kearney. 2002. “A Critique of Legal Measures of Brand Confusion.” Journalof Product & Brand Management 11 (6): 357–79.Nam et al. 2007. “The Fashion-conscious Behaviors of Mature Female Consumers.” InternationalJournal of Consumer Studies 31 (1).Nia, and Zaichkowsky. 2000. “Do Counterfeits Devalue the Ownership of Luxury Brands?”Journal of Product & Brand Management 9 (7): 485–97.Nia, Zaichkowsky, Wilcox, Kim, and Sen. 2008. “Why Do Consumers Buy Counterfeit LuxuryBrands?” Journal of Marketing Research 45.Nill, and Shultz. 1996. “The Scourge of Global Counterfeiting.” Business Horizons 39 (6): 37–42.Olsen, and Granzin. 1992. “Gaining Retailers’ Assistance in Fighting Counterfeiting: Conceptualizationand Empirical Test of a Helping Model.” Journal of Retailing 68 (1): 90–109.———. 1993. “Using Channels Constructs to Explain Dealers’ Willingness to Help ManufacturesCombat Counterfeiting.” Journal of Business Research 27 (2): 147–70.Olson. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Paquot. 2012. “En Lisant Georg Simmel.” Hermès, La Revue 63, no. 2.Phau, Prendergast, and Chuen. 2001. “Profiling Brand-Piracy-Prone Consumers: An ExploratoryStudy in Hong Kong’s Clothing Industry.” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management5 (1): 45–55.Phau, and Teah. 2009. “Devil Wears (Counterfeit) Prada: A Study of Antecedents and Outcomesof Attitudes towards Counterfeits of Luxury Brands.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 26(1): 15–27.Powell, Dalton, and Strom. 2012. Comparative Politics Today. 10th ed. Boston: Longman.Przeworsk, Adam, and Teune. 1970. Comparative Politics Today. Chicago: University of ChicagoPress.Ragin, and Becker. 1992. What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundation of Social Inquiry. CambridgeUniversity Press.Revel. 2006. The Institution and the Social, Critical Course: Twelve Exercises in Social History.Paris: Galaade.Ronkainen, and Guerrero-Cusumano. 2001. “Correlates of Intellectual Property Violation.” MultinationalBusiness Review 9 (1): 59–65.Shafritz, Ott, and Jang. 2015. Classics of Organization Theory. Cengage Learning.Sharma, and Chan. 2017. “Exploring the Role of Attitudinal Functions in Counterfeit PurchaseBehavior via an Extended Conceptual Framework.” Psychology & Marketing 34 (3).Shultz, and Nill. 2002. “The Societal Conundrum of Intellectual Property Rights: A Game-TheoreticalApproach to the Equitable Management and Protection of IPR.” European Journalof Marketing 36 (5/6): 667–88.Shultz, and Saporito. 1996. “Protecting Intellectual Property: Strategies and Recommendationsto Deter Counterfeiting and Brand Piracy in Global Markets.” Columbia Journal of WorldBusiness 31 (1): 18–28.Silverstein, Michael, and Neil Fiske. 2003. “Luxury for the Masses.” Harvard Business Review81 (4).“Snapshot.” n.d. Accessed December 12, 2020a. https://infoguerre.fr/2016/02/lvmh-de-l%E2%80%99art-de-la-guerre-contre-la-contrefacon/.“———.” n.d. Accessed December 13, 2020b. https://infoguerre.fr/2016/02/lvmh-de-l%E2%80%99art-de-la-guerre-contre-la-contrefacon/.Solomon, and Rabolt. 2004. “Consumer Psychology.” Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, no.1.Sonmez, and Yang. 1-18. “Manchester United versus China: A Counterfeiting and TrademarkMatch.” Managing Leisure 10 (1): 2005.Staake, Thiesse, and Fleisch. 2009. “The Emergence of Counterfeit Trade: A Literature Review.”European Journal of Marketing 43 (3): 320–49.The Economist. 2016a. “Stamping It Out,” April 23, 2016. https://www.economist.com/international/2016/04/23/stamping-it-out.———. 2016b. “Stamping It Out,” April 23, 2016. https://www.economist.com/international/2016/04/23/stamping-it-out.Tournay, Virginie. 2011. Sociologie Des Institutions. Paris: PUF.Trainer. 2002. “The Fight against Trademark Counterfeiting.” The China Business Review, no.November/December: 20–24.Truong, and Mccoll. n.d. “Intrinsic Motivations, Self-Esteem, and Luxury Goods Consumption.”Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, no. November: 2011.Tsai. 2005. “Impact of Personal Orientation on Luxury-Brand Purchase Value: An InternationalInvestigation.” International Journal of Market Research 47 (4).UnifAdmin. 2018a. “Contrefaçon & terrorisme.” UNIFAB - Union des Fabricants (blog). November5, 2018. https://www.unifab.com/contrefacon-terrorisme/.———. 2018b. “Contrefaçon & terrorisme.” UNIFAB - Union des Fabricants (blog). November5, 2018. https://www.unifab.com/contrefacon-terrorisme/.“UNPACKING THE FAKE | On Publishing.” n.d. Accessed December 11, 2020a. http://www.idworld-magazine.com/?p=3107.“———.” n.d. Accessed December 12, 2020b. http://www.id-world-magazine.com/?p=3107.Valade. 1998. La Valeur de La Sociologie Les Travaux de Raymond Boudon. Paris: LibrairieDroz.Wald, and Holleran. 2007. “Counterfeit Products and Faulty Supply Chain: A Johnson & JohnsonBrand Integrity Case Study.” Risk Management Magazine 54 (4).Wang, and Fang. 2005. “Purchasing Pirated Software: An Initial Examination of ChineseConsumers.” Journal of Consumer Marketing.Weber, Max. 1964. L’éthique Protestante et l’esprit Du Capitalisme. Suivi d’un Essai. Paris: LibrairiePlon.Wilcox, Kim, and Sen. 2009a. “Why Do Consumers Buy Counterfeit Luxury Brands?” Journalof Marketing Research 46 (2): 247–59.———. 2009b. “Why Do Consumers Buy Counterfeit Luxury Brands?” Journal of MarketingResearch 46: 247–259.Yang, Sonmez, and David Bosworth. 2004. “Intellectual Property Abuses: How Should MultinationalsRespond?” Long Range Planning 37 (5): 459–75.Zaichkowsky. 2006. Psychology behind Trademark Infringement Counterfeiting. PsychologyPress.Zhou, and Belk. 2004. “Chinese Consumer Readings of Global and Local Advertising Appeals.”Journal of Advertising 33 (3).Zimmerman, and Chaudhry. 2009. “Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: The Special Case ofChina.” Journal of Asia Pacific Business 10: 308–25.ReportsBaldini, Tallacchini, Fovino, Vakalis, Rana, Chiaramello, Mahieu, and D’Orazio. 2015. “Fightagainst Counterfeiting of Goods Related to IP Infringing.” JRC Science and Policy Report.Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015: European Commission.Buchanan, Philippe, and Lourdes Chavarria. 2015. “How to Understand the Impact of IllicitTrade on Business Around the World.” Euromonitor International.Desoyres, Jacques. 2013. “IPR in China: Guidance for Researchers.” Delegation of the EuropeanUnion to China: European Commission.Dittmeier, Caroline, and Paolo Casati. 2014. “Evaluating Internal Control Systems A ComprehensiveAssessment Model (CAM) for Enterprise Risk Management.” IIARF RESEARCHREPORT. The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation.“Fraud Risk Management: A Guide to Good Practice.” 2009. Chartered Institute of ManagementAccountants. https://www.cgma.org/resources/reports/fraud-risk-management.html.Hardy. 2015a. “The International Chamber of Commerce, 2015, Rights Holders and Intermediaries:All in This Together BASCAP, Anti-Counterfeiting 2015, A Global Guide.” WorldTrade Review. The International Chamber of Commerce.Hardy, Jeff. 2015b. “Rights Holders and Intermediaries: All in This Together.” Anti-counterfeiting2015 A Global Guide. Paris: ICC BASCAP.———. 2015c. “Rights Holders and Intermediaries: All in This Together BASCAP. Anti- Counterfeiting2015, A Global Guide.” A global guide, World Trademark Review. The InternationalChamber of Commerce.Intellectual Property Office, and Foreign & Commonwealth Office. 2015. “Report on China-Southeast Asia Anti-Counterfeiting.” DPS-003081. Intellectual Property Office: IntellectualProperty Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-on-china-southeast-asia-anti-counterfeiting.Jansen, Marion, and Eddy Lee. 2007. “Trade and Employment: Challenges for Policy Research:A Joint Study of the International Labour Office and the Secretariat of the World TradeOrganization.” IPS in China, guidance for researchers, delegation of the EU to China. InternationalLabour Organization.Kitch, and Perlman. 2009. “What Is a Trademark?” American Bar Association.Lim, Ai-Leen. 2008. “Hong Kong Contributing Firm Bird & Bird - Anti-Counterfeiting 2008 – AGlobal Guide.” World Trademark Review.“Mapping the Real Routes of Trade in Fake Goods.” 2017. OECD Publishing. Paris: OECD/EUIPO. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264278349-en.“Promoting IPR Policy and Enforcement in China - Summary of OECD China Dialogues on IntellectualProperty Rights Policy and Enforcement.” 2005. Paris: Organization for EconomicCooperation and Development.“Promoting IPR Policy and Enforcement in China - Summary of OECD - China Dialogues onIntellectual Property Rights Policy and Enforcement.” 2005. OECD Publishing. Paris:OECD.“Promoting IPR Policy and Enforcement in China: Summary of Dialogues between OECD andChina.” 2005a. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2005/01. Vol.2005/01. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/676211282105.“———.” 2005b. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2005/01. Vol.2005/01. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/676211282105.Sullivan, and Wilson. 2017. “Partnerships and the Battle Against Product Counterfeits.” MichiganUniversity: Center for Anti-Counterfeiting and Product Protection.“The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting.” 1998. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperationand Development.“The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting – Counterfeiting and Piracy Overall Assessment, Draftfor Limited Distribution.” 2006. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.“The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy.” 2008. Paris: Organization for EconomicCooperation and Development.“The Illicit Trafficking of Counterfeit Goods and Transnational Organized Crime.” 2014. Austria:United Nations Office on Drugs and Crimes.“The Impact of Counterfeiting on Online Consumer Rights in Europe.” 2017. European Union:European Consumer Center.“Trade and Development Report.” 2006. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Geneva: United Nations.“Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods: Mapping the Economic Impact.” 2016. OECD Publishing.Paris: OECD/EUIPO. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264252653-en.Zhang, Gang. n.d. “Promoting IPR Policy and Enforcement in China: Summary of Dialoguesbetween OECD and China.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working PapersDSTI/DOC(2005)1. OECD Publications, 2 rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris, Cedex 16,France.: Organization of Cooperation and of Development Economics Organization forEconomic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/676211282105.pdf?expires=1607672037&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=43B0-FAE1DA8923AD2D52F19C6A76F4DA.ThesisCademan, Arvid, and Dan Halvarsson. 2012. “The Affect of Counterfeit Products on LuxuryBrands.” Bachelor Thesis, Linnaeus University.Jiang, Ling, and Véronique Cova. 2012. “Investigation into Chinese consumers’ interpersonaland personal aspects of counterfeit luxury branded products consumption.” Thèse de find’études, Aix-en-Provence: University Paul-Cézanne, Aix-Marseille 3. https://www.afmmarketing.org/en/system/files/publications/20120603151858_S16_3_Jiang_et_Cova.pdf.SeminarsAhimbisibwe. Ronald K. n.d. “Counterfeiting and Its Impact on Social Economic Development.”Webminar, WIPO.Frederick Warzee. n.d. “Survey Counterfeit Cosmetics.” Data & Analytics. Accessed December13, 2020. https://www.slideshare.net/FrederickWarzee/survey-counterfeit-cosmetics.Husband, Paul. 2007. “The Cult of Luxury Brand - Inside Asia’s Love Affair with LuxuryTarget.” Conference, UCLSA. https://www.clsau.com/member/download/files/244/clsau_thecultofluxurybrand_070518_final.pdf.Quarles & Brady. n.d. “Anti-Counterfeiting and Brand Protection Strategies for China.” Droit.Accessed December 12, 2020. https://fr.slideshare.net/Quarles/anticounterfeiting-andbrand-protection-strategies-for-china.Redfearn, Nick. 2020. “Customs IP Border Protection in South East Asia.” IP Strategy Track,Rouse. https://rouse.com/insights/news/2020/the-counterfeit-goods-surge-in-southeastasia. 描述 博士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語博士學位學程(IDAS)
102265513資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102265513 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳宗文 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Tzung-Wen en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 薛芬妮 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) GUINOT Fanny Laurette en_US dc.creator (作者) 薛芬妮 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Laurette, GUINOT Fanny en_US dc.date (日期) 2021 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Mar-2021 14:50:50 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Mar-2021 14:50:50 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Mar-2021 14:50:50 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0102265513 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134179 - dc.description (描述) 博士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 亞太研究英語博士學位學程(IDAS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 102265513 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 贗品無處不在,無論在哪裡,這些假冒產品都獲得了越來越多的成功。但是,亞洲尤其受影響。確實,中國無疑是假貨的生產地,⽽香港在產品到達最終⽬的地(例如台灣)無疑是重要的商品過境地。通過對台灣和香港的現象進行比較,這是對該地區的深入研究。針對是從行為者,⾏動水平還是在政策上,假冒都是全球性問題。因此,有必要檢驗這些不同政黨在反恐鬥爭中製定的不同策略,以便考慮可能的替代方案,以便更好地理解問題。在這裡,我們將針對這種現象和將要採取的政策提出整體方法,並對歐洲案例進⾏研究,以此作為採取這些策略的基礎。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Copies are legion and there is a growing success for these fake products, no matter where. However, Asia is particularly affected. Indeed, China is undoubtedly the workshop of fakes and Hong Kong an important transit zone for products, before they reach their final destination, such as Taiwan. This will be an in-depth examination of the region through a comparison of the phenomenon in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Counterfeiting is a global problem, both in terms of actors, levels of action and policies; it is therefore essential to examine the different strategies developed by these different parties in the fight against counterfeiting in order to consider the possible alternatives for a better understanding of the issue.We will propose here a holistic approach to the phenomenon and the policies to be put in place, as well as a study of the European case as a basis for approaching these strategies. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Table of CONTENTSList of Figures 8List of Tables 10List of Abbreviations 11Abstract 12Acknowledgement 13CHAPTER 1 A GENERAL INTRODUCTION 141. Introduction, a general background 141.1. From counterfeit to fake trademark, a global issue for luxury goods 141.1.1. Definition 141.1.2. The international trademark system 151.1.3. counterfeit as a global issue 151.2. The origin of counterfeit 171.3. From local news items to a regional analysis - a bottom-up approach 192. Literature review 222.1. Luxury counterfeiting 232.2. Defining illicit trade 252.3. Legal issues and legislative concerns 282.4. Possible alternative to avert counterfeit trade 302.5. A lack in political science approach 313. Theoretical framework 333.1. Reviewing the conceptual framework 333.1.1. trademark counterfeits theories 333.1.2. organization vs institution 353.1.3. Institutions and counterfeits 403.2. Theorizing the current existing framework 423.2.1. Comparing the governments’ institutions 423.2.2. The current juridicial framework 433.2.3. IPR enforcement as an organization 443.3. Additional remarks and notions 484. Research questions and research hypotheses 525. Methodology 535.1. A Comparison between places and events 545.1.1. Why these two cases? 545.1.2. Why are they comparable and to what extent? 555.2. Two comparable places? 565.3. How to compare them? 585.4. How to choose them? 596. Significance of the research and limitations of the study 606.1. Significance of the research 606.2 Limitations of the study 62CHAPTER 2 WHAT IS TRADEMARK COUNTERFEITING AND WHY SUCH ANISSUE? 641. What is luxury trademark counterfeit? 651.1. From illicit trade to brand imitation 661.2. Luxury trademark infringed goods 681.3. Luxury trademark counterfeit, an institutionalized issue? 691.4. Intellectual Property in China: a rather new legal frame 721.5. Concluding remarks 752. Why the success of counterfeiting? 782.1. Powerful Worldwide Brands 802.1.1. Weak Enforcement at every level 812.1.2. Taiwan and Hong Kong institutional counterfeit organization 842.1.3. Low Cost Luxury with Low Investment 882.2. The customers` behavior: is the purchaser accomplice? 882.3. High Profits 892.4. Globalization and lower trade barriers leading counterfeiting 922.5. Concluding remarks 943. counterfeiting in Asia : a complex itinerary 943.1. Asia, the main culprit? 953.1.1. The cultural aspect 963.1.2. The growth of the Chinese economy 993.1.3. Estimating the Size of the Chinese Counterfeit Market 1013.2. Provenance: China, the main supplier 1023.3. Route: Taiwan and Hong Kong, two important retailers 1043.4. Hong Kong and Taiwan, but not only 1073.5. Concluding remarks 1084. The counterfeit market 1084.1. The weight of luxury counterfeit industry on global luxury economy 1094.2. The market growth 1134.2.1. The Luxury market growth 1134.2.2. The Counterfeit Luxury market growth 1154.3. Who buys luxury counterfeits? 1164.3.1. Deceptive counterfeit 1184.3.2. Non-deceptive counterfeit 1184.3.3. Up to dating the distinction 1194.4. The pirates` retailing strategies 1214.4.1. Physical stores or the 2015 seize in Hong Kong 1224.4.2. The virtual market of Counterfeits, the 2018 Taiwan case 1234.4.3. Retailing strategies conclusions, causes and consequences 1244.5. Concluding remarks 1255. Findings 1265.1 Empirical findings 1265.2 Theoretical findings 130CHAPTER 3 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: AN INSUFFICIENTFRAMEWORK? 1321. Intergovernmental organizations governing IPR 1341.1. The theory of organization – an appropriate model? 1351.2. An institutionalized and organized phenomenon 1361.3. Multilateral organizations 1441.3.1. World Trade Organization: TRIPS 1451.3.2. World Intellectual Property Organization 1461.3.3. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1481.3.4. The International Criminal Police Organization 1491.3.5. Industry associations that Govern IPR: The IACC 1511.4. concluding remarks 1522. Introduction of a multi-level protection 1522.1. The government organizations in Hong Kong and Taiwan 1542.1.1. Actors 1562.1.2. Places and things 1652.1.3. Rules and regulations 1702.2. Concluding remarks - a lack of cooperation? 1783. How society shapes individuals- An individual perspective 1783.1.The importance of the society on individuals - interpersonal aspects 1823.1.1. Social status 1823.1.2. Social acceptance 1843.2. The weight of society on shaping individuals in their personal aspects 1853.2.1. Self-esteem 1863.2.2. Self-fulfillment 1863.3. Concluding remarks 1884. The firm and their products 1894.1. The product level 1904.1.1. The conception of the product 1914.1.2. The production 1924.1.3. The distribution channels 1934.1.4. Managerial Insights Regarding the IPR Environment 1954.2. Concerns the Industry as a whole 1974.3. Concluding remarks 2005. Findings 2015.1 Empirical findings 2015.2 Theoretical findings 203CHAPTER 4 IPR ENFORCEMENT, A GLOBAL ORGANIZATION WITH LIMITSWHAT ALTERNATIVE FOR A MORE EFFICIENT STRATEGY? 2051. Level layered alternatives 2051.1. Anti-piracy marketing techniques to educate the consumer 2061.1.1. Educating the customer: Anti-Counterfeiting Advertisements 2071.1.2. Peer Pressure 2081.1.3. Fear 2091.1.4. Quality of the Product 2101.1.5. Negative Association with Suppliers 2141.2. Firms Level - Must be proactive to Protect Their IPR 2161.3. Towards more cooperation: China – Taiwan – Hong Kong, new allies? 2201.3.1. Towards an alignment of the legal framework 2211.3.2. Cooperative and comprehensive intergovernmental strategies 2221.3.3. Hong Kong and Taiwan, newcomers in OI? 2241.4. Findings on IPR enforcement 2252. The transverse EU model for the protection of IPR, an effective model? 2272.1. EU IPR Enforcement Initiatives and strategies 2292.1.1. Directive in the EU to Pursue Counterfeiters 2312.1.2. Seeking Retribution: The European Commission 2332.1.3. The EU a team strategy with its allies 2333. Findings on alternatives for the Asian reality 2373.1. pre-existing measures to be improved 2393.1.1. Targeted marketing techniques to educate the consumer 2403.1.2. The firms and the public private partnerships 2413.1.3. Towards more communication, cooperation in the region? 2423.1.4. Supra-national level 2433.2. Measures to implement 2443.2.1.Individual level 2453.2.2.Firm level 2463.2.3.State Level 2473.2.4.Transnational level 2484. General findings on the alternatives to implement 250 !CHAPTER 5 GENERAL FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS 2541. General findings 2541.1. Field report 2541.2. Considered alternatives 2561.3. Theoretical contribution 2592. Limitations 2602.1. Methodology 2602.2. Political brakes 261 !References 263Appendix 277 zh_TW dc.format.extent 19704520 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102265513 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 奢侈 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 香港 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 臺灣 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 假冒 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Luxury en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Counterfeit en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Trademark en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Taiwan en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Hong Kong en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) institutions en_US dc.title (題名) ⾹港與台灣的奢侈品商標保護之比較研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Institutional Issues of Luxury Counterfeits: The Cases of Hong Kong and Taiwan en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ReferencesAkerlof. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” TheQuarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.Albers-Miller, and Nancy. 1999. “Consumer Misbehavior: Why People Buy Illicit Goods.” Journalof Consumer Marketing 16 (3).Ang et al. 2001. “Spot the Difference: Consumer Responses towards Counterfeits.” Journal ofConsumer Marketing.Arellano. 1994. “Informal-Underground Retailers in Less-Developed Countries: An ExploratoryResearch from a Marketing Point of View.” Journal of Macromarketing 14 (2): 21–35.Bach. 2004. “The Double Punch of Law and Technology: Fighting Music Piracy or Re-MakingCopyright in a Digital Age?” Business and Politics 6 (2): 1–35.Badie, Bernard, and Dominique Vidal. 2017. Un Monde d’inégalités. La Découverte.Balkin, and Shepherd. 2004. “Piracy as Strategy? A Reexamination of Product Piracy.” WorkingPaper Economia. Instituto de Empresa, Madrid.Bearden, William, and Etzel. 1982. “Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand PurchaseDecisions.” Journal of Consumer Research 9 (2).Berman. 2006. “Developing an Effective Customer Loyalty Program.” California ManagementReview 49 (1).———. 2008. “Strategies to Detect and Reduce Counterfeiting Activity.” Journal of Brand Management.Bernoux, Pierre. 1985. Sociologie Des Organisations. Initiation Théorique Suivie de Douze CasPratiques. Points.Bloch, Bush, and Campbell. 1993. “Consumer ‘Accomplices’ in Product Counterfeiting.” Journalof Consumer Marketing 10 (4): 27–33.Bosworth, David. 2006a. Counterfeiting and Piracy: The State of the Art. Working paper. IntellectualProperty Research Centre, St Peter’s College, Oxford.———. 2006b. “Counterfeiting and Piracy: The State of the Art.” Working paper. IntellectualProperty Research Centre, St Peter’s College, Oxford.Bouglé. 1909. La Démocratie Devant La Science. Études Critiques Sur l’hérédité, La Concurrenceet La Différenciation,. Félix Alcan. Paris.Bourdieu, Pierre. 1980. Questions de Sociologie. Editions de Minuit.———. 1994. Raisons Pratiques: Sur La Théorie de l’action. Seuil. Paris.Burawoy. 1992. “The Extended Case Method.” In . Cambridge University Press.Bush, Bloch, and Dawson. 1989. “Remedies for Product Counterfeiting.” Business Horizons 32(1): 59–65.Bushman. 1993. “What’s in a Name? The Moderating Role of Public Self-Consciousness on theRelation between Brand Label and Brand Preference.” Journal of Applied Psychology 78(5).Buton. 2010. “Histoires d’institutions. Réflexions Sur l’historicité Des Faits Institutionnels.”Raisons Politiques 4 (40).Cademan, Arvid, and Dan Halvarsson. 2012. “The Affect of Counterfeit Products on LuxuryBrands,” 84.Cappelen, Ådne, Nils Petter Gleditsch, and Olav Bjerkholt. 1984. “Military Spending and EconomicGrowth in the OECD Countries.” Journal of Peace Research 21 (4).Cesareo, Pastore, and Williams. 2017a. “Chapter 9.” In Handbook of Research on Counterfeitingand Illicit Trade. Peggy E. Chaudhry.———. 2017b. “Counterfeiting Luxury Goods.” Handbook of Research on Counterfeiting andIllicit Trade. Edward Elgar Publishing.Chadha, Radha, and Paul Husband. 2006. The Cult of the Luxury Brand: Inside Asia’s Love Affairwith Luxury. Nicholas Brealey International.Chan. 2016. “Protecting and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in China.” Partnering Perspectives,no. Fall.Chaty, Lionel. 1999. Elements Pratique Pour l’analyse Des Institutions. PUF. La méthode enActes.Chaudhry. 2006. “Managing Intellectual Property Rights: Government Tactics to Curtail CounterfeitTrade.” European Business Law Review 17 (4): 939–58.Chaudhry, Cordell, and Zimmerman. 2005. “Modeling Anti-Counterfeiting Strategies in Responseto Protecting Intellectual Property Rights in a Global Environment.” The MarketingReview 5 (1): 59–72.Chaudhry, and Walsh. 1996. “An Assessment of the Impact of Counterfeiting in InternationalMarkets: The Paradox Persists.” Columbia Journal of World Business 31 (3): 34–48.Chaudhry, and Zimmerman. 2009. The Economics of Counterfeit Trade: Governments, Consumers,Pirates and Intellectual Property Rights. Springer Science&Business Media.Chaudhry, Zimmerman, Peters, and Cordell. 2008. “Preserving Intellectual Property Rights: ManagerialInsight into the Escalating Counterfeit Market Quandary.” Journal of BusinessHorizons 52: 57–66.———. 2009. “Preserving Intellectual Property Rights: Managerial Insight into the EscalatingCounterfeit Market Quandary.” Business Horizons 52 (1).Clark. 2006. “Counterfeiting in China: A Blueprint for Change.” The China Business Review, no.January/February: 9–46.Crozier, Michel. 1963. Le Phénomène Bureaucratique, Essai Sur Les Tendances BureaucratiquesDes Systèmes d’organisation Modernes et Sur Leur Relation En France Avec Le SystèmeSocial et Culturel. Editions du Seuil. Paris.Danchev. 2009. On Art and War and Terror. Edimburgh Univeristy Press Ltd.“Développement.” n.d.Dimitrov. 2009. Piracy and the State, The Politics of Intellectual Property Rights in China.Cambridge University Press.Dion. 1993. “Erhard Friedberg et l’analyse Stratégique.” Revue Française de Science Politique43 (6).Douglas, Mary. 1978. “Cultural Bias.” Occasional paper no. 35. London, Royal AnthropologicalInstitute of Great Britain and Ireland.———. 1990. “La Connaissance de Soi.” Revue Du MAUSS, no. 8.———. 1999. Comment Pensent Les Institutions. La Découverte-MAUSS. Paris.———. 2004. Comment Pensent Les Institutions. La Découverte.Dubois, and Duquesne. 1993. “The Market for Luxury Goods: Income versus Culture.” EuropeanJournal of Marketing.Dubois, and Paternault. 1995. “Observations: Understanding the World of International LuxuryBrands: The Dream Formula.” Journal of Advertising Research 35 (4): 69–75.Durkheim, Emile. 1983a. Pragmatism and Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.———. 1983b. Préface à La Seconde Edition, Les Règles de La Méthode Sociologique. 21st ed.Paris: PUF.———. 2013. Les Règles de La Méthode Sociologique. Presses Electroniques de France.Eisend, Marin, and Pakize Schuchert-Güler. 2006. “Explaining Counterfeit Purchases: A Reviewand Preview.” Academy of Marketing Science Review.Farraj, Aisha. 2015. “The Third-Shift Problem in China: The First Step Is Admitting You Have aProblem.” Law School Student Scholarship, paper 779.Fauconnet, Paul, and Marcel Mauss. 1901. “Sociologie.” In Grande Encyclopédie, 30:165–75.Le Sens Commun. Paris.Felstiner, Abel, and Sarat. 1980. “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming,Claiming, Blaming.” Law and Society Review 15 (3/4).Flynn, Goldsmith, and Eastman. 1996. “Opinion Leaders and Opinion Seekers: Two New MeasurementScales.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24 (2).Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et Punir. Paris: Gallimard.Gentry et al. 2006. “The Effects of Counterfeiting on Consumer Search.” Journal of ConsumerBehaviour: An International Research Review 5 (3): 245–56.Gentry, Sanjay, Shultz, and Suraj. 2001. “How Now Ralph Lauren? The Separation of Brand andProduct in a Counterfeit Culture.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 29 (6):258–65.Globerman. 1988. “Addressing International Product Piracy.” Journal of International BusinessStudies 19 (3): 497–504.Goffman. 1968. Asiles. Etudes Sur La Condition Sociale Des Malades Mentaux. Présentation deRobert Castel, Traduction Française. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Green, and Smith. 2002. “Executive Insights: Countering Brand Counterfeiters.” Journal of InternationalMarketing 10 (4): 89–106.Grémion, Pierre. 1976. Le Pouvoir Périphérique. Le Seuil.Grossman, and Shapiro. 1988a. “Counterfeit-Product Trade.” American Economic Review 78 (1):59–75.———. 1988b. “Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 103(1): 79–100.Hansen. 1978. “The Capital of Counterfeiting.” Dun’s Review.Harvey. 1987. “Industrial Product Counterfeiting: Problems and Proposed Solutions.” The Journalof Business & Industrial Marketing 2 (4): 5–14.———. 1988. “A New Way to Combat Product Counterfeiting.” Business Horizons 31 (4): 19–28.Harvey, and Ronkainen. 1985. “International Counterfeiters: Marketing Success without the Costand the Risk.” Columbia Journal of World Business 20 (3): 37–45.Harvey, and Walls. 2003. “Laboratory Markets in Counterfeit Goods: Hong Kong versus Las Vegas.”Applied Economics Letters 10 (14): 883–87.Hetzler. 2002. “Godfathers and Pirates: Counterfeiting and Organized Crime.” European Journalof Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 10 (4): 303–20.Hill, and Varone. 2017. The Public Policy Process. 7th ed. Routledge.Hilton, Choi, and Chen. 2004. “The Ethics of Counterfeiting in the Fashion Industry: Quality,Credence and Profit Issues.” Journal of Business Ethics 55 (4): 343–52.Hung. 2003. “The Business of Product Counterfeiting in China and the Post-WTO MembershipEnvironment.” Asia Pacific Business Review 10 (1): 58–77.Husted. 2000. “The Impact of National Culture on Software Piracy.” Journal of Business Ethics26 (3): 197–211.Jacobs, Samli, and Jedlik. 2001. “The Nightmare of International Product Piracy – Exploring DefensiveStrategies.” Industrial Marketing Management 30 (6): 499–509.Jain. 1996. “Problems in International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights.” Journal of InternationalMarketing 4 (1): 9–32.Javorcik. 2004. “The Composition of Foreign Direct Investment and Protection of IntellectualProperty Rights: Evidence from Transition Economies.” European Economic Review 48(1): 39–62.Kaikati, and LaGarce. 1980. “Beware of International Brand Piracy.” Harvard Business Review58 (2): 52–58.Kapferer, Jean-Noël. 2015. Kapferer on Luxury: How Luxury Brands Can Grow Yet RemainRare. Kogan Page.Kapferer, Jean-Noël, and Michaut. 2014. “Luxury Counterfeit Purchasing: The Collateral Effectof Luxury Brands’ Trading down Policy.” Journal of Brand Strategy 3 (1): 59–70.Krechevsky. 2000. “The Multinational Approach to Anti-Counterfeiting.” The Journal of ProprietaryRights 12 (9): 1–12.Lai, and Zaichkowsky. 1999. “Brand Imitation: Do the Chinese Have Different Views?” AsiaPacific Journal of Management 16 (2).Lascu, and Zinkhan. 1999. “Consumer Conformity: Review and Applications for MarketingTheory and Practice.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 7 (3).“L’attrait.” n.d.Ledent, David. 2007. “Sociologie et Sociétés, 2004, 36 (2). Présences de Marcel Mauss: Éd. ParMarcel Fournier & Jean-Christophe Marcel. Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal,272 p.” L’Homme, no. 181 (February). https://doi.org/10.4000/lhomme.3013.Liebowitz. 1985. “Copying and Indirect Appropriability: Photocopying Journals.” Journal of PoliticalEconomy 93 (5): 945–57.———. 2005. “Economists’ Topsy-Turvy View of Piracy.” Review of Economic Research onCopyright Issues 2 (1): 5–17.Lin, and Chen. n.d. “Taiwan: Trade Mark Laws and Regulations 2020.” Accessed November 30,2020. ICLG.com, https://iclg.com/practice-areas/trade-marks-laws-and-regulations/taiwan.“LVMH, de l’art de la guerre contre la contrefaçon.” 2016a. Infoguerre (blog). February 15,2016. https://infoguerre.fr/2016/02/lvmh-de-l%e2%80%99art-de-la-guerre-contre-lacontrefacon/.“———.” 2016b. Infoguerre (blog). February 15, 2016. https://infoguerre.fr/2016/02/lvmh-de-l%e2%80%99art-de-la-guerre-contre-la-contrefacon/.Marron, Donald, and Steel. 2000. “Which Countries Protect Intellectual Property? The Case ofSoftware Piracy.” Economic Inquiry 38 (2).Mauss, Marcel. 1969. Oeuvres. 3. Cohésion Sociale et Division de La Sociologie. Paris: Les Éditionsde Minuit.McCracken. 1986. “Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movementof the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods.” Journal of Consumer Research 13(1).Mendonça, Pereira, and Godinho. 2004. “Trademarks as an Indicator of Innovation and IndustrialChange.” Research Policy 33 (9): 1385–1404.Mill, John Stuart. 2011. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. 1 vols. Cambridge UniversityPress.Millard. 1995. “Hauriou et La Théorie de l’institution.” Droit et Société, no. 30/31.Miller, Karen. 2013. “Hedonic Customer Responses to Fast Fashion and Replicas.” Journal ofFashion Marketing and Management 17 (May). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-10-2011-0072.Mitchell, V.-W., and Kearney. 2002. “A Critique of Legal Measures of Brand Confusion.” Journalof Product & Brand Management 11 (6): 357–79.Nam et al. 2007. “The Fashion-conscious Behaviors of Mature Female Consumers.” InternationalJournal of Consumer Studies 31 (1).Nia, and Zaichkowsky. 2000. “Do Counterfeits Devalue the Ownership of Luxury Brands?”Journal of Product & Brand Management 9 (7): 485–97.Nia, Zaichkowsky, Wilcox, Kim, and Sen. 2008. “Why Do Consumers Buy Counterfeit LuxuryBrands?” Journal of Marketing Research 45.Nill, and Shultz. 1996. “The Scourge of Global Counterfeiting.” Business Horizons 39 (6): 37–42.Olsen, and Granzin. 1992. “Gaining Retailers’ Assistance in Fighting Counterfeiting: Conceptualizationand Empirical Test of a Helping Model.” Journal of Retailing 68 (1): 90–109.———. 1993. “Using Channels Constructs to Explain Dealers’ Willingness to Help ManufacturesCombat Counterfeiting.” Journal of Business Research 27 (2): 147–70.Olson. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Paquot. 2012. “En Lisant Georg Simmel.” Hermès, La Revue 63, no. 2.Phau, Prendergast, and Chuen. 2001. “Profiling Brand-Piracy-Prone Consumers: An ExploratoryStudy in Hong Kong’s Clothing Industry.” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management5 (1): 45–55.Phau, and Teah. 2009. “Devil Wears (Counterfeit) Prada: A Study of Antecedents and Outcomesof Attitudes towards Counterfeits of Luxury Brands.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 26(1): 15–27.Powell, Dalton, and Strom. 2012. Comparative Politics Today. 10th ed. Boston: Longman.Przeworsk, Adam, and Teune. 1970. Comparative Politics Today. Chicago: University of ChicagoPress.Ragin, and Becker. 1992. What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundation of Social Inquiry. CambridgeUniversity Press.Revel. 2006. The Institution and the Social, Critical Course: Twelve Exercises in Social History.Paris: Galaade.Ronkainen, and Guerrero-Cusumano. 2001. “Correlates of Intellectual Property Violation.” MultinationalBusiness Review 9 (1): 59–65.Shafritz, Ott, and Jang. 2015. Classics of Organization Theory. Cengage Learning.Sharma, and Chan. 2017. “Exploring the Role of Attitudinal Functions in Counterfeit PurchaseBehavior via an Extended Conceptual Framework.” Psychology & Marketing 34 (3).Shultz, and Nill. 2002. “The Societal Conundrum of Intellectual Property Rights: A Game-TheoreticalApproach to the Equitable Management and Protection of IPR.” European Journalof Marketing 36 (5/6): 667–88.Shultz, and Saporito. 1996. “Protecting Intellectual Property: Strategies and Recommendationsto Deter Counterfeiting and Brand Piracy in Global Markets.” Columbia Journal of WorldBusiness 31 (1): 18–28.Silverstein, Michael, and Neil Fiske. 2003. “Luxury for the Masses.” Harvard Business Review81 (4).“Snapshot.” n.d. Accessed December 12, 2020a. https://infoguerre.fr/2016/02/lvmh-de-l%E2%80%99art-de-la-guerre-contre-la-contrefacon/.“———.” n.d. Accessed December 13, 2020b. https://infoguerre.fr/2016/02/lvmh-de-l%E2%80%99art-de-la-guerre-contre-la-contrefacon/.Solomon, and Rabolt. 2004. “Consumer Psychology.” Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, no.1.Sonmez, and Yang. 1-18. “Manchester United versus China: A Counterfeiting and TrademarkMatch.” Managing Leisure 10 (1): 2005.Staake, Thiesse, and Fleisch. 2009. “The Emergence of Counterfeit Trade: A Literature Review.”European Journal of Marketing 43 (3): 320–49.The Economist. 2016a. “Stamping It Out,” April 23, 2016. https://www.economist.com/international/2016/04/23/stamping-it-out.———. 2016b. “Stamping It Out,” April 23, 2016. https://www.economist.com/international/2016/04/23/stamping-it-out.Tournay, Virginie. 2011. Sociologie Des Institutions. Paris: PUF.Trainer. 2002. “The Fight against Trademark Counterfeiting.” The China Business Review, no.November/December: 20–24.Truong, and Mccoll. n.d. “Intrinsic Motivations, Self-Esteem, and Luxury Goods Consumption.”Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, no. November: 2011.Tsai. 2005. “Impact of Personal Orientation on Luxury-Brand Purchase Value: An InternationalInvestigation.” International Journal of Market Research 47 (4).UnifAdmin. 2018a. “Contrefaçon & terrorisme.” UNIFAB - Union des Fabricants (blog). November5, 2018. https://www.unifab.com/contrefacon-terrorisme/.———. 2018b. “Contrefaçon & terrorisme.” UNIFAB - Union des Fabricants (blog). November5, 2018. https://www.unifab.com/contrefacon-terrorisme/.“UNPACKING THE FAKE | On Publishing.” n.d. Accessed December 11, 2020a. http://www.idworld-magazine.com/?p=3107.“———.” n.d. Accessed December 12, 2020b. http://www.id-world-magazine.com/?p=3107.Valade. 1998. La Valeur de La Sociologie Les Travaux de Raymond Boudon. Paris: LibrairieDroz.Wald, and Holleran. 2007. “Counterfeit Products and Faulty Supply Chain: A Johnson & JohnsonBrand Integrity Case Study.” Risk Management Magazine 54 (4).Wang, and Fang. 2005. “Purchasing Pirated Software: An Initial Examination of ChineseConsumers.” Journal of Consumer Marketing.Weber, Max. 1964. L’éthique Protestante et l’esprit Du Capitalisme. Suivi d’un Essai. Paris: LibrairiePlon.Wilcox, Kim, and Sen. 2009a. “Why Do Consumers Buy Counterfeit Luxury Brands?” Journalof Marketing Research 46 (2): 247–59.———. 2009b. “Why Do Consumers Buy Counterfeit Luxury Brands?” Journal of MarketingResearch 46: 247–259.Yang, Sonmez, and David Bosworth. 2004. “Intellectual Property Abuses: How Should MultinationalsRespond?” Long Range Planning 37 (5): 459–75.Zaichkowsky. 2006. Psychology behind Trademark Infringement Counterfeiting. PsychologyPress.Zhou, and Belk. 2004. “Chinese Consumer Readings of Global and Local Advertising Appeals.”Journal of Advertising 33 (3).Zimmerman, and Chaudhry. 2009. “Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: The Special Case ofChina.” Journal of Asia Pacific Business 10: 308–25.ReportsBaldini, Tallacchini, Fovino, Vakalis, Rana, Chiaramello, Mahieu, and D’Orazio. 2015. “Fightagainst Counterfeiting of Goods Related to IP Infringing.” JRC Science and Policy Report.Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015: European Commission.Buchanan, Philippe, and Lourdes Chavarria. 2015. “How to Understand the Impact of IllicitTrade on Business Around the World.” Euromonitor International.Desoyres, Jacques. 2013. “IPR in China: Guidance for Researchers.” Delegation of the EuropeanUnion to China: European Commission.Dittmeier, Caroline, and Paolo Casati. 2014. “Evaluating Internal Control Systems A ComprehensiveAssessment Model (CAM) for Enterprise Risk Management.” IIARF RESEARCHREPORT. The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation.“Fraud Risk Management: A Guide to Good Practice.” 2009. Chartered Institute of ManagementAccountants. https://www.cgma.org/resources/reports/fraud-risk-management.html.Hardy. 2015a. “The International Chamber of Commerce, 2015, Rights Holders and Intermediaries:All in This Together BASCAP, Anti-Counterfeiting 2015, A Global Guide.” WorldTrade Review. The International Chamber of Commerce.Hardy, Jeff. 2015b. “Rights Holders and Intermediaries: All in This Together.” Anti-counterfeiting2015 A Global Guide. Paris: ICC BASCAP.———. 2015c. “Rights Holders and Intermediaries: All in This Together BASCAP. Anti- Counterfeiting2015, A Global Guide.” A global guide, World Trademark Review. The InternationalChamber of Commerce.Intellectual Property Office, and Foreign & Commonwealth Office. 2015. “Report on China-Southeast Asia Anti-Counterfeiting.” DPS-003081. Intellectual Property Office: IntellectualProperty Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-on-china-southeast-asia-anti-counterfeiting.Jansen, Marion, and Eddy Lee. 2007. “Trade and Employment: Challenges for Policy Research:A Joint Study of the International Labour Office and the Secretariat of the World TradeOrganization.” IPS in China, guidance for researchers, delegation of the EU to China. InternationalLabour Organization.Kitch, and Perlman. 2009. “What Is a Trademark?” American Bar Association.Lim, Ai-Leen. 2008. “Hong Kong Contributing Firm Bird & Bird - Anti-Counterfeiting 2008 – AGlobal Guide.” World Trademark Review.“Mapping the Real Routes of Trade in Fake Goods.” 2017. OECD Publishing. Paris: OECD/EUIPO. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264278349-en.“Promoting IPR Policy and Enforcement in China - Summary of OECD China Dialogues on IntellectualProperty Rights Policy and Enforcement.” 2005. Paris: Organization for EconomicCooperation and Development.“Promoting IPR Policy and Enforcement in China - Summary of OECD - China Dialogues onIntellectual Property Rights Policy and Enforcement.” 2005. OECD Publishing. Paris:OECD.“Promoting IPR Policy and Enforcement in China: Summary of Dialogues between OECD andChina.” 2005a. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2005/01. Vol.2005/01. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/676211282105.“———.” 2005b. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2005/01. Vol.2005/01. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/676211282105.Sullivan, and Wilson. 2017. “Partnerships and the Battle Against Product Counterfeits.” MichiganUniversity: Center for Anti-Counterfeiting and Product Protection.“The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting.” 1998. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperationand Development.“The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting – Counterfeiting and Piracy Overall Assessment, Draftfor Limited Distribution.” 2006. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.“The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy.” 2008. Paris: Organization for EconomicCooperation and Development.“The Illicit Trafficking of Counterfeit Goods and Transnational Organized Crime.” 2014. Austria:United Nations Office on Drugs and Crimes.“The Impact of Counterfeiting on Online Consumer Rights in Europe.” 2017. European Union:European Consumer Center.“Trade and Development Report.” 2006. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Geneva: United Nations.“Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods: Mapping the Economic Impact.” 2016. OECD Publishing.Paris: OECD/EUIPO. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264252653-en.Zhang, Gang. n.d. “Promoting IPR Policy and Enforcement in China: Summary of Dialoguesbetween OECD and China.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working PapersDSTI/DOC(2005)1. OECD Publications, 2 rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris, Cedex 16,France.: Organization of Cooperation and of Development Economics Organization forEconomic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/676211282105.pdf?expires=1607672037&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=43B0-FAE1DA8923AD2D52F19C6A76F4DA.ThesisCademan, Arvid, and Dan Halvarsson. 2012. “The Affect of Counterfeit Products on LuxuryBrands.” Bachelor Thesis, Linnaeus University.Jiang, Ling, and Véronique Cova. 2012. “Investigation into Chinese consumers’ interpersonaland personal aspects of counterfeit luxury branded products consumption.” Thèse de find’études, Aix-en-Provence: University Paul-Cézanne, Aix-Marseille 3. https://www.afmmarketing.org/en/system/files/publications/20120603151858_S16_3_Jiang_et_Cova.pdf.SeminarsAhimbisibwe. Ronald K. n.d. “Counterfeiting and Its Impact on Social Economic Development.”Webminar, WIPO.Frederick Warzee. n.d. “Survey Counterfeit Cosmetics.” Data & Analytics. Accessed December13, 2020. https://www.slideshare.net/FrederickWarzee/survey-counterfeit-cosmetics.Husband, Paul. 2007. “The Cult of Luxury Brand - Inside Asia’s Love Affair with LuxuryTarget.” Conference, UCLSA. https://www.clsau.com/member/download/files/244/clsau_thecultofluxurybrand_070518_final.pdf.Quarles & Brady. n.d. “Anti-Counterfeiting and Brand Protection Strategies for China.” Droit.Accessed December 12, 2020. https://fr.slideshare.net/Quarles/anticounterfeiting-andbrand-protection-strategies-for-china.Redfearn, Nick. 2020. “Customs IP Border Protection in South East Asia.” IP Strategy Track,Rouse. https://rouse.com/insights/news/2020/the-counterfeit-goods-surge-in-southeastasia. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202100385 en_US