學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 重複朗讀教學對國小英語學習者閱讀流暢度影響之個案研究
A Case Study on the Effect of Assisted Repeated Reading on An EFL Young Learner’s Oral Reading Fluency作者 林金燕
Lin, Chin-Yen貢獻者 尤雪瑛
Yu, Hsueh-Ying
林金燕
Lin, Chin-Yen關鍵詞 輔助式重複口語朗讀
句法分析
音韻朗讀
口語朗讀流暢度
閱讀動機
自然發音教學
Repeated reading
Oral reading fluency
Syntactic parsing
Assisted teaching activities
Prosodic reading
Reading motivation
Phonics instruction日期 2021 上傳時間 10-Feb-2022 12:52:09 (UTC+8) 摘要 本個案研究旨在探討,透過輔助式重複口語朗讀教學活動,對於台灣的一所公立小學一位四年級EFL學生其閱讀流暢度的成效。在為期四週的實驗裡,研究者執行了前測、四次教學活動、十二次的課後朗讀練習、後測,以及延遲後測。教材內容為一篇178字的非文學類文章,並在實驗後,請受試者接受訪談,以了解受試者對於輔助式重複口語朗讀教學活動的感受、自身的閱讀能力變化和其閱讀動機。其研究結果顯示,相較於前測,在後測及延遲後測的表現上,受試者在接受重複朗讀教學後,對於單字發音、句法分析、朗讀語調的變化,以及朗讀速度的成效,都有顯著的進步。只有少數單字的發音錯誤,還出現在後測及延遲後測中。朗讀文章的語調變化及語音詞組的長度在結果中,也有正面的進步。同時也降低句子朗讀裡,不合語法的停頓和換氣。經過四週的練習,受試者的閱讀速度在19次閱讀朗讀的錄音記錄中做比較,有大幅提昇。受試者的訪談結果,表達了對輔助式重複口語朗讀教學活動有正向的感受,願意進一步多去閱讀。本研究結果證實重複口語朗讀練習,有助於口語朗讀流暢度,建議英語學習者應該要著重日常口語朗讀練習,並由教學者給予指導而利於進步。
The current study intends to probe the effect of oral reading fluency through assisted repeated reading activities on a Taiwanese EFL fourth-grade L2 learner. During the four-week experiment, the researcher conducted the tasks of pretest, four teaching sessions, posttest, delayed posttest, and 12 home practices with 178-word nonfiction text. An interview was rendered to the participant in order to realize how the participant viewed the reading program and how she benefited from the program in terms of reading ability and motivation. The learner’s word pronunciation, syntactic parsing, and reading rate have demonstrated prominent progress after the repeated oral reading treatment as shown in the comparison among the pretest, the posttest, and delayed posttest. Only a few miscues still remained in the participant’s oral reading as presented in the results of the posttest and the delayed posttest. As for syntactic parsing, the data is analyzed by Praat. The results show that the length of phonological phrases increases. The numbers of pausal intrusions and improper breath takings also decrease. With regard to reading rate, the participant has reduced the time used in the 19 oral reading recordings. The participant is willing to read more and learn through the assistance of repeated oral reading activities. It is evident that repeated oral reading is an effective way to improve oral reading fluency. Learners are suggested to do daily practices in oral reading and guided by instructors to acquire improvement.參考文獻 Allington, R. L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The reading teacher, 36(6), 556-561.Aldhanhani, Z. R., & Abu-Ayyash, E. A. (2020). Theories and Research on Oral Reading Fluency: What Is Needed?. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(4), 379-388.Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children`s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading research quarterly, 34(4), 452-477.Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational psychology, 102(4), 773.Daane, M. C. (2005). The nation`s report card: fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading. National Center for Education Statistics.Davis, M. H., Tonks, S. M., Hock, M., Wang, W., & Rodriguez, A. (2018). A review of reading motivation scales. Reading Psychology, 39(2), 121-187.Dowhower, S. L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers` fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 389-406.Duke, N. k., Pressley, M., & Hilden, K. (2004).Difficulties with reading comprehension. In C. A. Stone, E.R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders(pp. 501-520). New York: Guilford.Ehri, L., Nunes, S., Stahl, S., & Willows, D. (2001). Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel`s Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393-447.Ehri, L. C. (2002). Phases of acquisition in learning to read words and implications for teaching. In BJEP Monograph Series II, Number 1-Learning and Teaching Reading (Vol. 7, No. 28, pp. 7-28). British Psychological Society.Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings.Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific studies of reading, 5(3), 239-256.Gaskins, I.W., Ehri, L.C., Cress, C.O., O’Hara, C., & Donnelly, K.(1996/1997). Procedures for word learning: Making discoveries about words. The Reading Teacher, 50(4), 312–327.General English Proficiency Test (GEPT). (n.d). Retrieved May 26, 2021, fromhttps://www.geptkids.org.tw/Home/downloadGredler, G. R. (2002). Snow, CE, Burns, MS, & Griffin, P.(eds.)(1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 432 pp., $35.95.Gunning, T. (1995). Word building: A strategic approach to the teaching of phonics. The Reading Teacher, 48(6), 484–488.Harpine, William D. (2019). Is Oral Reading Important in Correcting Reading Failure? In After-School Programming and Intrinsic Motivation: Teaching At-Risk Students to Read (pp.21-28). After-School Programming and Intrinsic Motivation: Teaching At-Risk Students to Read.Hasbrouck, J. (2006). For Students Who Are Not Yet Fluent, Silent Reading Is Not the Best Use of Classroom Time. American Educator, Summer 2006, 30(2).Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The reading teacher, 59(7), 636-644.Herman, P. (1985). The Effect of Repeated Readings on Reading Rate, Speech Pauses, and Word Recognition Accuracy. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(5), 553-565.Hingston, M. (2017). The Impacts of Explicit Systematic Phonics Instruction on the Areas of Decoding and Fluency for Students with a Specific Learning Disability in Reading.Homan, S. P., Klesius, J. P., & Hite, C. (1993). Effects of repeated readings and nonrepetitive strategies on students` fluency and comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 87(2), 94-99.Huang, L. V., Nelson, R. B., & Nelson, D. (2008). Increasing reading fluency through student-directed repeated reading and feedback. The California School Psychologist, 13(1), 33-40.Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how?. The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702-714.Huxley, A. B. P. (2006). A text-based intervention of reading fluency, comprehension, and content knowledge. University of Michigan.Kim, Y. S., Wagner, R. K., & Foster, E. (2011). Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: A latent variable study of first-grade readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 338-362.Kuhn, M. R., Rasinski, T., & Young, C. H. A. S. E. (2007). Best practices in fluency instruction. Best practices in literacy instruction, 3.Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody and definitions of fluency. Reading research quarterly, 45(2), 230-251.Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational psychology, 100(2), 310.Kowal, S., O`Connell, D. C., O`Brien, E. A., & Bryant, E. T. (1975). Temporal aspects of reading aloud and speaking: Three experiments. The American Journal of Psychology, 549-569.Linnea C. Ehri (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words (pp. 108)Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2008). A longitudinal study of the development of reading prosody as a dimension of oral reading fluency in early elementary school children. Reading research quarterly, 43(4), 336-354.Miller, S. D., & Smith, D. E. (1985).Differences in literal and inferential comprehension after reading orally and silently.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 341.Miller, S. D., & Smith, D. E. (1990). Relations among oral reading, silent reading and listening comprehension of students at differing competency levels. Literacy Research and Instruction, 29(2), 73-84National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children.Nation, P. (2007). The four strands. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2-13.Nevo, E., Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., Brande, S., & Gambrell, L. (2020). Oral reading fluency, reading motivation and reading comprehension among second graders. Reading and Writing, 1-26.Paul Boersma & David Weenink (2005): Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.5.16) [Computer program].Retrieved Feb 22, 2007, from http://www.praat.org/Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. (1979). Coding and comprehension in skilled reading and implications for reading instruction. Theory and practice of early reading, 1, 57-84.Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Cognitive research and the misconceptions of reading education. Reading development and the teaching of reading: A psychological perspective (pp. 43-58). Oxford: Blackwell PublishersPrice, K. W., Meisinger, E. B., Louwerse, M. M., & D’Mello, S. (2016). The contributions of oral and silent reading fluency to reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 37(2), 167-201.S. Jay Samuels (1979). The Method of Repeated Readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 4, 403-408Schreiber, P. A. (1980). On the acquisition of reading fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12(3), 177-186.Schreiber, P. A. (1987). Prosody and structure in children`s syntactic processing. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 243–270). Academic Press.Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (1995). How research might inform the debate about early reading acquisition. Journal of Research in Reading.Rasinski, T., & Hoffman, J. (2003). Theory and Research into Practice: Oral Reading in the School Literacy Curriculum. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(4), 510-522.Rasinski, T., Rupley, W. H., & Nichols, W. D. (2008). Two essential ingredients: Phonics and fluency getting to know each other. The Reading Teacher, 62(3), 257-260.Reutzel, D. R., & Hollingsworth, P. M. (1993). Effects of fluency training on second graders` reading comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(6), 325-331.Reutzel, D., Hollingsworth, P., & Eldredge, J. (1994). Oral Reading Instruction: The Impact on Student Reading Development. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(1), 41-62.Reutzel, D. R., Jones, C. D., Fawson, P. C., & Smith, J. A. (2008). Scaffolded silent reading: A complement to guided repeated oral reading that works!. The Reading Teacher, 62(3), 194-207.Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The reading teacher, 32(4), 403-408.Samuels, S. J. (1983). A critique of, A theory of automaticity in reading: Looking back: A retrospective analysis of the LaBerge-Samuels Reading Model. Reading research revisited, 39-55.Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in second language acquisition, 357-385.Serrano, R., & Huang, H. Y. (2018). Learning vocabulary through assisted repeated reading: How much time should there be between repetitions of the same text?. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 971-994.Shen, H. H., Zhou, Y., & Gao, G. (2020). Oral Reading Miscues and Reading Comprehension by Chinese L2 Learners.Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventingreading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: NationalAcademy Press.Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (1999). How research might inform the debate about early reading acquisition. In J. Oakhill & R. Beard (Eds.), Reading development and the teaching of reading: A psychological perspective (pp. 12-41). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Susan P. Homana, Janell P. Klesiusa & Clare (1993). Effects of Repeated Readings and Nonrepetitive Strategies on Students` Fluency and Comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 87, 2, 94-99.Swalm, J. E. (1972). A Comparison of Oral Reading, Silent Reading and Listening Comprehension. Education, 92(4), 111-5.Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and special education, 25(4), 252-261.Toste, J. R., Didion, L., Peng, P., Filderman, M. J., & McClelland, A. M. (2020). A metaanalytic review of the relations between motivation and reading achievement for K-12students. Review of Educational Research.William J. Therrien. (2004) Fluency and Comprehension Gains as a Result of Repeated Reading. A Meta-Analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25,4,252-261.Wolf, G. M. (2018). Developing reading automaticity and fluency: Revisiting what reading teachers know, putting confirmed research into current practice. Creative Education, 9(06), 838.Zugel, K. (2012). Success for Students With Diverse Reading Abilities Through the Use of Supplemental Reading Curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 199-209.林美瑩(2002)。國小字母拼讀法教學與其教學順序之研究。國立政治大學語言學研究所碩士論文。顏惠英(2004)。直接、有系統之字母拼讀教學與有意涵之閱讀讀物練習對國小學童外語閱讀之成效。國立成功大學外國語文學系碩博士班碩士論文。陳冠宜(2006)。字母拼讀法融入國小英語科低成就學童補救教學之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士班論文。郭翠秀(2007)。閱讀教學與國民小學學童閱讀動機及行為的關係—以2005年PIRLS資料為例。國立中央大學學習與教學研究所碩士論文。羅引宏(2008)。朗讀與默讀對於不同年級國小學童閱讀理解與閱讀速率的影響之比較。國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文,屏東縣。李茵琦(2009)。WordBox及WordSort字母拼讀法對國小三年級學童之音韻覺識及拼字能力之影響。臺北市立教育大學英語教學系碩士班碩士論文。林虹伶(2011)。重覆閱讀與非重覆閱讀對國小學童口語閱讀流暢度之效益研究。國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班碩士論文。羅淑如(2013)。英語口語閱讀教學課程對臺灣國小學童口語流暢度之效益。國立雲林科技大學應用外語系碩士班碩士論文。王嘉菱(2013)。引導式重複口語閱讀教學法在低成就學生英語認字能力與閱讀流暢度之成效。國立臺北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士班碩士論文。馮鈴惠(2014)。閱讀模式與發展因素對台灣國小學童英文閱讀速率和閱讀理解之影響。國立彰化師範大學兒童英語研究所碩士論文。李珮甄(2016)。互動式朗讀偏重於字母拼讀對國小低成就學生英文認字和閱讀流暢度影響之研究。國立中正大學外國語文學系碩士在職專班論文。 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
102555010資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102555010 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 尤雪瑛 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Yu, Hsueh-Ying en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林金燕 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lin, Chin-Yen en_US dc.creator (作者) 林金燕 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Lin, Chin-Yen en_US dc.date (日期) 2021 en_US dc.date.accessioned 10-Feb-2022 12:52:09 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 10-Feb-2022 12:52:09 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 10-Feb-2022 12:52:09 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0102555010 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138879 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 語言學研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 102555010 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本個案研究旨在探討,透過輔助式重複口語朗讀教學活動,對於台灣的一所公立小學一位四年級EFL學生其閱讀流暢度的成效。在為期四週的實驗裡,研究者執行了前測、四次教學活動、十二次的課後朗讀練習、後測,以及延遲後測。教材內容為一篇178字的非文學類文章,並在實驗後,請受試者接受訪談,以了解受試者對於輔助式重複口語朗讀教學活動的感受、自身的閱讀能力變化和其閱讀動機。其研究結果顯示,相較於前測,在後測及延遲後測的表現上,受試者在接受重複朗讀教學後,對於單字發音、句法分析、朗讀語調的變化,以及朗讀速度的成效,都有顯著的進步。只有少數單字的發音錯誤,還出現在後測及延遲後測中。朗讀文章的語調變化及語音詞組的長度在結果中,也有正面的進步。同時也降低句子朗讀裡,不合語法的停頓和換氣。經過四週的練習,受試者的閱讀速度在19次閱讀朗讀的錄音記錄中做比較,有大幅提昇。受試者的訪談結果,表達了對輔助式重複口語朗讀教學活動有正向的感受,願意進一步多去閱讀。本研究結果證實重複口語朗讀練習,有助於口語朗讀流暢度,建議英語學習者應該要著重日常口語朗讀練習,並由教學者給予指導而利於進步。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The current study intends to probe the effect of oral reading fluency through assisted repeated reading activities on a Taiwanese EFL fourth-grade L2 learner. During the four-week experiment, the researcher conducted the tasks of pretest, four teaching sessions, posttest, delayed posttest, and 12 home practices with 178-word nonfiction text. An interview was rendered to the participant in order to realize how the participant viewed the reading program and how she benefited from the program in terms of reading ability and motivation. The learner’s word pronunciation, syntactic parsing, and reading rate have demonstrated prominent progress after the repeated oral reading treatment as shown in the comparison among the pretest, the posttest, and delayed posttest. Only a few miscues still remained in the participant’s oral reading as presented in the results of the posttest and the delayed posttest. As for syntactic parsing, the data is analyzed by Praat. The results show that the length of phonological phrases increases. The numbers of pausal intrusions and improper breath takings also decrease. With regard to reading rate, the participant has reduced the time used in the 19 oral reading recordings. The participant is willing to read more and learn through the assistance of repeated oral reading activities. It is evident that repeated oral reading is an effective way to improve oral reading fluency. Learners are suggested to do daily practices in oral reading and guided by instructors to acquire improvement. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Acknowledgements iiiList of Tables xChinese Abstract ivEnglish Abstract vChapter1. Introduction 1Background of the Study 1Motivation of the Study 3Research Purpose and Questions 42. Literature Review 5Stages of Reading Development 5The Importance of Reading Fluency 6Reading Fluency and Phonics 8Whole Language Instruction vs. Phonics-Emphasis Instruction 11Reading Fluency and Syntactic Parsing 12Repeated Reading 13Oral Reading vs. Silent Reading 15Assisted Oral Reading 16Reading Miscues18Reading Fluency and Motivation 19Summary of the Review 203. Methodology 21Teaching Context 21Background of the Participant 24Materials 25Procedures 26Orientation and Pretest 26Assisted Fluency Activities 27Posttest and Delayed Posttest 29An Interview for the Reflection 32Data Collection 32Data Analysis 334. Results and Discussion 35Analysis of Word Pronunciation 35Miscues of Word Pronunciation in Pretest 35Miscues of Word Pronunciation in the Posttest and the Delayed Posttest 38The Comparison of the Numbers of Miscues in the Three Tests 40Numbers of Miscues in Home Practices and Four Teaching Sessions 42Analysis of Syntactic Parsing 45Pausal Intrusion and Breath Taking in the Three Tests 45Syntactic Parsing in the Pretest 47Syntactic Parsing in the Posttest and the Delayed Posttest 49The Length of Phonological Phrases in the Three Tests 50The Pitch Contour in the Three Tests 51Analysis of Oral Reading Rate 53Oral Reading Rate in Home Practices and Teaching Sessions 53The Comparison of Fluency in the Three Tests 55The Interview with the Participant 565. Conclusion 59Experiment Design of the Research 59Summary of the Major Findings 60Pedagogical Implications 63Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 65References 66AppendicesA. The Text 74B. Worksheet for the Text 75C. Text: Facts about Fruits and Vegetables 76D. Mispronounced Words in the Pretest 77E. Mispronounced Words in the Posttest 79F. Mispronounced Words in the Delayed Posttest 80G. Mispronounced Words in Home Practices 81H. Mispronounced Words in Four Teaching Sessions 95I. Syntactic Parsing of the Pretest Transcription Text Grids 99J. Syntactic Parsing of the Posttest Transcription Text Grids 102K. Syntactic Parsing of the Delayed Posttest Transcription Text Grids 105L. The Spectrograms of Transcription in the Three Tests 108M. The Pitch Contour in the Three Tests 112N. The Agreement for the Study 116 zh_TW dc.format.extent 5773960 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102555010 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 輔助式重複口語朗讀 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 句法分析 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 音韻朗讀 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 口語朗讀流暢度 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 閱讀動機 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自然發音教學 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Repeated reading en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Oral reading fluency en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Syntactic parsing en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Assisted teaching activities en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Prosodic reading en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Reading motivation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Phonics instruction en_US dc.title (題名) 重複朗讀教學對國小英語學習者閱讀流暢度影響之個案研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) A Case Study on the Effect of Assisted Repeated Reading on An EFL Young Learner’s Oral Reading Fluency en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Allington, R. L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The reading teacher, 36(6), 556-561.Aldhanhani, Z. R., & Abu-Ayyash, E. A. (2020). Theories and Research on Oral Reading Fluency: What Is Needed?. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(4), 379-388.Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children`s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading research quarterly, 34(4), 452-477.Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational psychology, 102(4), 773.Daane, M. C. (2005). The nation`s report card: fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading. National Center for Education Statistics.Davis, M. H., Tonks, S. M., Hock, M., Wang, W., & Rodriguez, A. (2018). A review of reading motivation scales. Reading Psychology, 39(2), 121-187.Dowhower, S. L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers` fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 389-406.Duke, N. k., Pressley, M., & Hilden, K. (2004).Difficulties with reading comprehension. In C. A. Stone, E.R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders(pp. 501-520). New York: Guilford.Ehri, L., Nunes, S., Stahl, S., & Willows, D. (2001). Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel`s Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393-447.Ehri, L. C. (2002). Phases of acquisition in learning to read words and implications for teaching. In BJEP Monograph Series II, Number 1-Learning and Teaching Reading (Vol. 7, No. 28, pp. 7-28). British Psychological Society.Ehri, L. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings.Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific studies of reading, 5(3), 239-256.Gaskins, I.W., Ehri, L.C., Cress, C.O., O’Hara, C., & Donnelly, K.(1996/1997). Procedures for word learning: Making discoveries about words. The Reading Teacher, 50(4), 312–327.General English Proficiency Test (GEPT). (n.d). Retrieved May 26, 2021, fromhttps://www.geptkids.org.tw/Home/downloadGredler, G. R. (2002). Snow, CE, Burns, MS, & Griffin, P.(eds.)(1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 432 pp., $35.95.Gunning, T. (1995). Word building: A strategic approach to the teaching of phonics. The Reading Teacher, 48(6), 484–488.Harpine, William D. (2019). Is Oral Reading Important in Correcting Reading Failure? In After-School Programming and Intrinsic Motivation: Teaching At-Risk Students to Read (pp.21-28). After-School Programming and Intrinsic Motivation: Teaching At-Risk Students to Read.Hasbrouck, J. (2006). For Students Who Are Not Yet Fluent, Silent Reading Is Not the Best Use of Classroom Time. American Educator, Summer 2006, 30(2).Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The reading teacher, 59(7), 636-644.Herman, P. (1985). The Effect of Repeated Readings on Reading Rate, Speech Pauses, and Word Recognition Accuracy. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(5), 553-565.Hingston, M. (2017). The Impacts of Explicit Systematic Phonics Instruction on the Areas of Decoding and Fluency for Students with a Specific Learning Disability in Reading.Homan, S. P., Klesius, J. P., & Hite, C. (1993). Effects of repeated readings and nonrepetitive strategies on students` fluency and comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 87(2), 94-99.Huang, L. V., Nelson, R. B., & Nelson, D. (2008). Increasing reading fluency through student-directed repeated reading and feedback. The California School Psychologist, 13(1), 33-40.Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how?. The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702-714.Huxley, A. B. P. (2006). A text-based intervention of reading fluency, comprehension, and content knowledge. University of Michigan.Kim, Y. S., Wagner, R. K., & Foster, E. (2011). Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: A latent variable study of first-grade readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 338-362.Kuhn, M. R., Rasinski, T., & Young, C. H. A. S. E. (2007). Best practices in fluency instruction. Best practices in literacy instruction, 3.Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody and definitions of fluency. Reading research quarterly, 45(2), 230-251.Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational psychology, 100(2), 310.Kowal, S., O`Connell, D. C., O`Brien, E. A., & Bryant, E. T. (1975). Temporal aspects of reading aloud and speaking: Three experiments. The American Journal of Psychology, 549-569.Linnea C. Ehri (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words (pp. 108)Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2008). A longitudinal study of the development of reading prosody as a dimension of oral reading fluency in early elementary school children. Reading research quarterly, 43(4), 336-354.Miller, S. D., & Smith, D. E. (1985).Differences in literal and inferential comprehension after reading orally and silently.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 341.Miller, S. D., & Smith, D. E. (1990). Relations among oral reading, silent reading and listening comprehension of students at differing competency levels. Literacy Research and Instruction, 29(2), 73-84National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children.Nation, P. (2007). The four strands. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2-13.Nevo, E., Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., Brande, S., & Gambrell, L. (2020). Oral reading fluency, reading motivation and reading comprehension among second graders. Reading and Writing, 1-26.Paul Boersma & David Weenink (2005): Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.5.16) [Computer program].Retrieved Feb 22, 2007, from http://www.praat.org/Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. (1979). Coding and comprehension in skilled reading and implications for reading instruction. Theory and practice of early reading, 1, 57-84.Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Cognitive research and the misconceptions of reading education. Reading development and the teaching of reading: A psychological perspective (pp. 43-58). Oxford: Blackwell PublishersPrice, K. W., Meisinger, E. B., Louwerse, M. M., & D’Mello, S. (2016). The contributions of oral and silent reading fluency to reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 37(2), 167-201.S. Jay Samuels (1979). The Method of Repeated Readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 4, 403-408Schreiber, P. A. (1980). On the acquisition of reading fluency. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12(3), 177-186.Schreiber, P. A. (1987). Prosody and structure in children`s syntactic processing. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 243–270). Academic Press.Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (1995). How research might inform the debate about early reading acquisition. Journal of Research in Reading.Rasinski, T., & Hoffman, J. (2003). Theory and Research into Practice: Oral Reading in the School Literacy Curriculum. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(4), 510-522.Rasinski, T., Rupley, W. H., & Nichols, W. D. (2008). Two essential ingredients: Phonics and fluency getting to know each other. The Reading Teacher, 62(3), 257-260.Reutzel, D. R., & Hollingsworth, P. M. (1993). Effects of fluency training on second graders` reading comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(6), 325-331.Reutzel, D., Hollingsworth, P., & Eldredge, J. (1994). Oral Reading Instruction: The Impact on Student Reading Development. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(1), 41-62.Reutzel, D. R., Jones, C. D., Fawson, P. C., & Smith, J. A. (2008). Scaffolded silent reading: A complement to guided repeated oral reading that works!. The Reading Teacher, 62(3), 194-207.Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The reading teacher, 32(4), 403-408.Samuels, S. J. (1983). A critique of, A theory of automaticity in reading: Looking back: A retrospective analysis of the LaBerge-Samuels Reading Model. Reading research revisited, 39-55.Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in second language acquisition, 357-385.Serrano, R., & Huang, H. Y. (2018). Learning vocabulary through assisted repeated reading: How much time should there be between repetitions of the same text?. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 971-994.Shen, H. H., Zhou, Y., & Gao, G. (2020). Oral Reading Miscues and Reading Comprehension by Chinese L2 Learners.Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventingreading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: NationalAcademy Press.Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (1999). How research might inform the debate about early reading acquisition. In J. Oakhill & R. Beard (Eds.), Reading development and the teaching of reading: A psychological perspective (pp. 12-41). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Susan P. Homana, Janell P. Klesiusa & Clare (1993). Effects of Repeated Readings and Nonrepetitive Strategies on Students` Fluency and Comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 87, 2, 94-99.Swalm, J. E. (1972). A Comparison of Oral Reading, Silent Reading and Listening Comprehension. Education, 92(4), 111-5.Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and special education, 25(4), 252-261.Toste, J. R., Didion, L., Peng, P., Filderman, M. J., & McClelland, A. M. (2020). A metaanalytic review of the relations between motivation and reading achievement for K-12students. Review of Educational Research.William J. Therrien. (2004) Fluency and Comprehension Gains as a Result of Repeated Reading. A Meta-Analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25,4,252-261.Wolf, G. M. (2018). Developing reading automaticity and fluency: Revisiting what reading teachers know, putting confirmed research into current practice. Creative Education, 9(06), 838.Zugel, K. (2012). Success for Students With Diverse Reading Abilities Through the Use of Supplemental Reading Curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 199-209.林美瑩(2002)。國小字母拼讀法教學與其教學順序之研究。國立政治大學語言學研究所碩士論文。顏惠英(2004)。直接、有系統之字母拼讀教學與有意涵之閱讀讀物練習對國小學童外語閱讀之成效。國立成功大學外國語文學系碩博士班碩士論文。陳冠宜(2006)。字母拼讀法融入國小英語科低成就學童補救教學之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士班論文。郭翠秀(2007)。閱讀教學與國民小學學童閱讀動機及行為的關係—以2005年PIRLS資料為例。國立中央大學學習與教學研究所碩士論文。羅引宏(2008)。朗讀與默讀對於不同年級國小學童閱讀理解與閱讀速率的影響之比較。國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文,屏東縣。李茵琦(2009)。WordBox及WordSort字母拼讀法對國小三年級學童之音韻覺識及拼字能力之影響。臺北市立教育大學英語教學系碩士班碩士論文。林虹伶(2011)。重覆閱讀與非重覆閱讀對國小學童口語閱讀流暢度之效益研究。國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班碩士論文。羅淑如(2013)。英語口語閱讀教學課程對臺灣國小學童口語流暢度之效益。國立雲林科技大學應用外語系碩士班碩士論文。王嘉菱(2013)。引導式重複口語閱讀教學法在低成就學生英語認字能力與閱讀流暢度之成效。國立臺北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士班碩士論文。馮鈴惠(2014)。閱讀模式與發展因素對台灣國小學童英文閱讀速率和閱讀理解之影響。國立彰化師範大學兒童英語研究所碩士論文。李珮甄(2016)。互動式朗讀偏重於字母拼讀對國小低成就學生英文認字和閱讀流暢度影響之研究。國立中正大學外國語文學系碩士在職專班論文。 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202200055 en_US