學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 Instagram主帳號、副帳號與特殊帳號之經營動機研究
Instagram Accounts Matter: Comparing the Motives for Maintaining Rinsta, Finsta, and Targeted Finsta Accounts作者 劉昱均
Liu, Yu-Chun貢獻者 張郁敏
Chang, Yuh-Miin
劉昱均
Liu, Yu-Chun關鍵詞 社群媒體
Instagram
使用與滿足研究
社群經營動機
多重帳號
Social media
Instagram
Uses and gratifications theory
Account management
Multiple accounts日期 2021 上傳時間 1-Jul-2022 16:23:33 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究以多重社群帳號為主題,從使用與滿足理論角度深入探討 Instagram 使用者經營多種類帳號之動機。透過網路問卷,本研究共蒐集950組 Instagram 主帳號、副帳號及特殊帳號之使用者調查,並利用探索性因素分析(EFA)、單一樣本t檢定(One sample t-test)與單因子變異數分析(ANOVA)進一步分析出三種帳號之經營動機。本研究發現使用者參與的六個構面(認知性、情感性、社交性、自我認同性、回饋性、賦權性)中,主要帳號的經營動機涵蓋認知(監測)、情感(娛樂)、社交及自我認同(自我延伸及真實我展現); 副帳號經營動機為情感(娛樂及逃避主義)、自我認同(自我延伸及真實我展現);而特殊帳號經營動機則涉及認知(資訊交流)、情感(娛樂及逃避主義)、社交、自我認同(自我延伸及理想我呈現)與賦權(賦權及被賦權)。本研究結果除了驗證單一社群平台上不同帳號之差異性,並提供社群媒體使用動機相關領域重要之實證研究參考資料外,本研究不顯著的結果亦提供了不一樣的探討可能性。
Given the prevalence of multiple account management among social media platforms, the present study unearths the motives for disparate Instagram account maintenance that have been conceptualized as general social media usage motivation. In light of the Uses and Gratifications framework, a sample of 950 registered Instagram users completed online surveys that helped gauge motives for regularly updating Rinsta, Finsta, and Targeted Finsta. The perceived motives were examined and results suggest that the motives for the maintenance of the three accounts are very distinct: Rinsta account involves cognitive (i.e., surveillance), affective (entertainment), social integrative, and personal identity (self-extension, actual self expression); Finsta account involves affective (i.e., entertainment, escapism), and personal identity (self extension, actual self expression) motivations; Targeted Finsta account involves cognitive (i.e., information exchange), affective (entertainment, escapism), social integrative, personal identity (self extension, ideal self presentation), and empowerment (empowered, empowering).參考文獻 Abbott, W., Donaghey, J., Hare, J., & Hopkins, P. (2013). An Instagram is worth a thousandwords: An industry panel and audience Q&A. Library Hi Tech News.Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they areand what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20(1), 1-48.Bartholomew, D. J., Knott, M., & Moustaki, I. (2011). Latent variable models and factoranalysis: A unified approach (Vol. 904). John Wiley & Sons.Baumeister, R. F. (1990). Suicide as escape from self. Psychological review, 97(1), 90.Baym, N. K. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community (Vol. 3): Sage.Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of consumer research, 15(2),139-168.Buffardi, L. E., & Campbell, W. K. (2008). Narcissism and social networking web sites.Personality and social psychology bulletin, 34(10), 1303-1314.Bewick, V., Cheek, L., & Ball, J. (2004). Statistics review 9: one-way analysis ofvariance. Critical care, 8(2), 1-7.Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do studentsuse facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343.Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2009). Understanding the sustainability of a virtualcommunity: model development and empirical test. Journal of Information Science,35(3), 279-298.Cheung, T. T. (2014). A study on motives, usage, self-presentation and number of followerson instagram.Clayton, R. B., Leshner, G., & Almond, A. (2015). The extended iSelf: The impact of iPhoneseparation on cognition, emotion, and physiology. Journal of computer-mediatedcommunication, 20(2), 119-135.Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Fourrecommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment,research, and evaluation, 10(1), 7.Courtois, C., Mechant, P., De Marez, L., & Verleye, G. (2009). Gratifications and seedingbehavior of online adolescents. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 15(1),109-137.Cupchik, G. C. (2011). The role of feeling in the Entertainment= Emotion formula. Journalof Media Psychology.Cushing, A. L. (2011). Self extension and the desire to preserve digital possessions.Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1),1-3.de Vries, L., Peluso, A. M., Romani, S., Leeflang, P. S., & Marcati, A. (2017). Explainingconsumer brand-related activities on social media: An investigation of the differentroles of self-expression and socializing motivations. Computers in Human Behavior,75, 272-282.Dewar, S., Islam, S., Resor, E., & Salehi, N. (2019). Finsta. Paper presented at the ExtendedAbstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model ofconsumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities.International journal of research in marketing, 21(3), 241-263.Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Fahy, J., & Goodman, S. (2015). Social media engagement behaviour:a uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3-4), 261-277. doi:10.1080/0965254x.2015.1095222Duffy, B. E., & Chan, N. K. (2019). “You never really know who’s looking”: Imaginedsurveillance across social media platforms. New Media & Society, 21(1), 119-138.Duffy, B. E., Pruchniewska, U., & Scolere, L. (2017). Platform-Specific Self-Branding. Paperpresented at the Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media &Society - #SMSociety17.Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentationprocesses in the online dating environment. Journal of computer-mediatedcommunication, 11(2), 415-441.Enberg, J. (2020, December 8). Global Instagram Users 2020. Insider Intelligence.https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-instagram-users-2020.Füller, J. (2006). Why consumers engage in virtual new product developments initiated byproducers. ACR North American Advances.Gao, W., Liu, Z., & Li, J. (2017). How does social presence influence SNS addiction? Abelongingness theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 347-355.Gerald, B. (2018). A brief review of independent, dependent and one sample ttest.International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, 4(2), 50-54.Goffman, E. (1959). 1990. The presentation of self in everyday life. London:Harmondsworth.(Reprinted, London: Penguin Books 1990).Goh, D. H.-L., Ang, R. P., Chua, A. Y., & Lee, C. S. (2009). Why we share: A study ofmotivations for mobile media sharing. Paper presented at the International Conferenceon Active Media Technology.Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychologicalreview, 94(3), 319.Hollenbeck, C. R., & Kaikati, A. M. (2012). Consumers` use of brands to reflect their actualand ideal selves on Facebook. International journal of research in marketing, 29(4),395-405. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.06.002Huang, Y.-T., & Su, S.-F. (2018). Motives for Instagram Use and Topics of Interest amongYoung Adults. Future Internet, 10(8). doi:10.3390/fi10080077Hur, M. H. (2006). Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: Exploring a typologyof the process and components across disciplines. Journal of community psychology,34(5), 523-540.Hwang, H. S., & Cho, J. (2018). Why Instagram? Intention to continue using Instagramamong Korean college students. Social Behavior and Personality: an internationaljournal, 46(8), 1305-1315.Instagram. (2021). Getting Started on Instagram for Business. Instagram for Business.https://business.instagram.com/getting-started.Islam, J. U., & Rahman, Z. (2017). The impact of online brand community characteristics oncustomer engagement: An application of Stimulus-Organism-Response paradigm.Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 96-109.Jang, J. Y., Han, K., Lee, D., Jia, H., & Shih, P. C. (2016). Teens engage more with fewerphotos: temporal and comparative analysis on behaviors in instagram. Paperpresented at the Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and SocialMedia.Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educationaland psychological measurement, 20(1), 141-151.Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401-415.Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.Kang, J., & Wei, L. (2020). Let me be at my funniest: Instagram users’ motivations for usingFinsta (a.k.a., fake Instagram). The Social Science Journal, 57(1), 58-71.doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2018.12.005Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The publicopinion quarterly, 37(4), 509-523.Katz, R. (1984). Empowerment and synergy: Expanding the community`s healing resources.Prevention in human services, 3(2-3), 201-226.Kemp, S. (2021, February 11). Digital in Taiwan: All the statistics you need in 2021 -DataReportal – global digital insights. DataReportal. Retrieved December 18, 2021,from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-taiwanKim, B., & Kim, Y. (2019). Facebook versus Instagram: How perceived gratifications andtechnological attributes are related to the change in social media usage. The SocialScience Journal, 56(2), 156-167.Lee, C. S., Bakar, N. A. B. A., Dahri, R. B. M., & Sin, S.-C. J. (2015). Instagram this!Sharing photos on Instagram. Paper presented at the International Conference onAsian Digital Libraries.Lee, E., Lee, J. A., Moon, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures Speak Louder than Words:Motivations for Using Instagram. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 18(9), 552-556.doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0157Leung, L. (2009). User-generated content on the internet: an examination of gratifications,civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society, 11(8),1327-1347.Li, Z. (2016). Psychological empowerment on social media: who are the empowered users?Public Relations Review, 42(1), 49-59.MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factoranalysis. Psychological methods, 4(1), 84.Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Selfpresentationand gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,29(6), 446-458.Marcus, S. (2015). Picturing`ourselves into being: assessing identity, sociality and visualityon Instagram. Paper presented at the international communication associationconference.Marx, G. T. (2016). Windows into the soul: Surveillance and society in an age of hightechnology: University of Chicago Press.McCay-Peet, L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2016). A Model of Social Media Engagement: UserProfiles, Gratifications, and Experiences. In Why Engagement Matters (pp. 199-217).McQuail, D. (1983). Mass communication theory: An introduction. London: SagePublications.McQuail, D., Blumler, J., & Brown, J. (1972). (1972) The Television Audience: A RevisedPerspective. In D. McQuail, Sociology of Mass Communications. Middlesex,England: Penguin, 135-165.Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(4), 357-364.Michikyan, M., Dennis, J., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2015). Can you guess who I am? Real,ideal, and false self-presentation on Facebook among emerging adults. EmergingAdulthood, 3(1), 55-64.Muntinga, D. G., Moorman, M., & Smit, E. G. (2015). Introducing COBRAs. InternationalJournal of Advertising, 30(1), 13-46. doi:10.2501/ija-30-1-013-046Muralidharan, S., & Men, L. R. (2015). How peer communication and engagementmotivations influence social media shopping behavior: Evidence from China and theUnited States. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(10), 595-601.Nov, O. (2007). What motivates Wikipedians? Communications of the ACM, 50(11), 60-64.doi:10.1145/1297797.1297798Orchard, L. J., Fullwood, C., Galbraith, N., & Morris, N. (2014). Individual differences aspredictors of social networking. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 19(3),388-402.Palmgreen, P., & Rayburn, J. D. (1979). Uses and gratifications and exposure to publictelevision: A discrepancy approach. Communication Research, 6(2), 155-179.Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networkingenvironment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes.Cyberpsychology & behavior, 12(6), 729-733.Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (2017a). Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tiestrength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brandcommitment, and membership intention. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 412-424.doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.004Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (2017b). Uses and gratifications of social networking sites forbridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,and Snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 115-122.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041Qamar, A. M., & Alassaf, M. (2020). Improving Sentiment Analysis of Arabic Tweets byOne-Way ANOVA. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and InformationSciences.Ross, S. (2019). Being Real on Fake Instagram: Likes, Images, and Media Ideologies ofValue. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 29(3), 359-374. doi:10.1111/jola.12224Rummel, R. J. (1988). Applied factor analysis. Northwestern University Press.Rubin, A. M. (1986). Uses, gratifications, and media effects research. Perspectives on mediaeffects, 281-301.Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Masscommunication & society, 3(1), 3-37.Sangwan, S. (2005). Virtual community success: A uses and gratifications perspective. Paperpresented at the Proceedings of the 38th annual hawaii international conference onsystem sciences.Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personalityinfluences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences,54(3), 402-407.Sheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship tonarcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89-97.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059Sivadas, E., & Machleit, K. A. (1994). A scale to determine the extent of object incorporationin the extended self. Marketing theory and applications, 5(1), 143-149.Song, Y.-A., Lee, S. Y., & Kim, Y. (2019). Does mindset matter for using social networkingsites?: understanding motivations for and uses of Instagram with growth versus fixedmindset. International Journal of Advertising, 38(6), 886-904.Sta ̊ hle, L., & Wold, S. (1989). Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Che- mometrics andIntelligent Laboratory Systems, 6, 259–272.Sung, Y., Lee, J.-A., Kim, E., & Choi, S. M. (2016). Why we post selfies: Understandingmotivations for posting pictures of oneself. Personality and Individual Differences,97, 260-265.Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An“interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review,15(4), 666-681.Thorlakson, A. J., & Murray, R. P. (1996). An empirical study of empowerment in theworkplace. Group & Organization Management, 21(1), 67-83.Ting, H., Ming, W. W. P., de Run, E. C., & Choo, S. L. Y. (2015). Beliefs about the use ofInstagram: An exploratory study. International Journal of business and innovation,2(2), 15-31.Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding theuse of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers inHuman Behavior, 27(2), 705-713.Trottier, D. (2016). Social media as surveillance: Rethinking visibility in a converging world:Routledge.van der Nagel, E. (2018). Alts and automediality: compartmentalising the self throughmultiple social media profiles. M/C Journal, 21(2).Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2003). Assessing motivation of contribution in onlinecommunities: An empirical investigation of an online travel community. Electronicmarkets, 13(1), 33-45.Wathieu, L., Brenner, L., Carmon, Z., Chattopadhyay, A., Wertenbroch, K., Drolet, A., ... &Wu, G. (2002). ConsumerControlAndEmpowerment.Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Net-surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual communities ascommunities. Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities,10(3), 34-60.Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratificationsapproach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362-369.doi:10.1108/qmr-06-2013-0041Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantagesof online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and websurvey services. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 10(3), JCMC1034.Xiao, S., Metaxa, D., Park, J. S., Karahalios, K., & Salehi, N. (2020). Random, Messy, Funny,Raw: Finstas as Intimate Reconfigurations of Social Media. Paper presented at theProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing onexploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 9(2),79-94.Young, N. L., Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Howard, C. J. (2017). Passive Facebook use,Facebook addiction, and associations with escapism: An experimental vignette study.Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 24-31.Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digitalempowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1816-1836.Zheng, X., Cheung, C. M., Lee, M. K., & Liang, L. (2015). Building brand loyalty throughuser engagement in online brand communities in social networking sites. InformationTechnology & People.Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. Self-efficacy inchanging societies, 1, 202-231.Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, andpsychological empowerment. American Journal of community psychology, 16(5),725-750.Zolkepli, I. A., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2014). The Antecedents of Social Media Adoption.ECSM 2014 University of Brighton Brighton, UK 10-11 July 2014, 594. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
107461003資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107461003 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 張郁敏 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chang, Yuh-Miin en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 劉昱均 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Liu, Yu-Chun en_US dc.creator (作者) 劉昱均 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Liu, Yu-Chun en_US dc.date (日期) 2021 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Jul-2022 16:23:33 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Jul-2022 16:23:33 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Jul-2022 16:23:33 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107461003 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140672 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 107461003 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以多重社群帳號為主題,從使用與滿足理論角度深入探討 Instagram 使用者經營多種類帳號之動機。透過網路問卷,本研究共蒐集950組 Instagram 主帳號、副帳號及特殊帳號之使用者調查,並利用探索性因素分析(EFA)、單一樣本t檢定(One sample t-test)與單因子變異數分析(ANOVA)進一步分析出三種帳號之經營動機。本研究發現使用者參與的六個構面(認知性、情感性、社交性、自我認同性、回饋性、賦權性)中,主要帳號的經營動機涵蓋認知(監測)、情感(娛樂)、社交及自我認同(自我延伸及真實我展現); 副帳號經營動機為情感(娛樂及逃避主義)、自我認同(自我延伸及真實我展現);而特殊帳號經營動機則涉及認知(資訊交流)、情感(娛樂及逃避主義)、社交、自我認同(自我延伸及理想我呈現)與賦權(賦權及被賦權)。本研究結果除了驗證單一社群平台上不同帳號之差異性,並提供社群媒體使用動機相關領域重要之實證研究參考資料外,本研究不顯著的結果亦提供了不一樣的探討可能性。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Given the prevalence of multiple account management among social media platforms, the present study unearths the motives for disparate Instagram account maintenance that have been conceptualized as general social media usage motivation. In light of the Uses and Gratifications framework, a sample of 950 registered Instagram users completed online surveys that helped gauge motives for regularly updating Rinsta, Finsta, and Targeted Finsta. The perceived motives were examined and results suggest that the motives for the maintenance of the three accounts are very distinct: Rinsta account involves cognitive (i.e., surveillance), affective (entertainment), social integrative, and personal identity (self-extension, actual self expression); Finsta account involves affective (i.e., entertainment, escapism), and personal identity (self extension, actual self expression) motivations; Targeted Finsta account involves cognitive (i.e., information exchange), affective (entertainment, escapism), social integrative, personal identity (self extension, ideal self presentation), and empowerment (empowered, empowering). en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 1. Introduction p.11.1 Research Background p.11.2 Research Objectives p.52. Literature Review p.72.1 Uses and Gratification Theory (UGT) and General Motives for Social Media Use p.72.2 The Cognitive Motives for the Three Instagram Accounts p.102.3 The Affective Motives for the Three Instagram Accounts p.122.4 The Social Integrative Motives for the Three Instagram Accounts p.142.5 The Personal Identity Motives for the Three Instagram Accounts p.152.6 The Remuneration and Empowerment Motives for the Three Instagram Accounts p.183. Methodology p.223.1 Overview of the Study p.223.2 Survey p.223.21 Population and Sampling Methods p.223.22 Procedure p.233.23 Survey Design p.233.3 Pretest p.243.4 Measures p.263.41 Cognitive motive: Information exchange p.263.42 Cognitive motive: Surveillance p.273.43 Affective motive: Entertainment p.283.44 Affective motive: Escapism p.293.45 Social Integrative motive p.303.46 Personal Identity motive: Self-extension p.313.47 Personal Identity motive: Ideal self presentation p.323.48 Personal Identity motive: Actual self expression p.333.49 Remuneration motive p.343.410 Empowerment motive: Empowered p.353.410 Empowerment motive: Empowering p.364. Results p.374.1 Participants p.374.2 Research Question Testing p.394.21 Exploratory Factor Analysis p.404.211 Factor Analysis of Cognitive motive p.414.212 Factor Analysis of Affective motive p.424.213 Factor Analysis of Social Integrative motive p.434.124 Factor Analysis of Personal Identity motive p.444.215 Factor Analysis of Remuneration motive p.454.216 Factor Analysis of Empowerment motive p.464.22 One-way ANOVA and One-sample t-test p.474.221 Test Results of Cognitive Motive p.484.221 Test Results of Affective Motive p.504.223 Test Results of Social Integrative Motive p.514.224 Test Results of Personal Identity Motive p.534.225 Test Results of Remuneration Motive p.554.226 Test Results of Empowerment Motive p.564.23 Summary of the Results of Research Questions Testing p.585. Discussion and Conclusion p.605.1 The Cognitive Motives for the Three Instagram Accounts p.605.2 The Affective Motives for the Three Instagram Accounts p.615.3 The Social Integrative Motives for the Three Instagram Accounts p.635.4 The Personal Identity Motives for the Three Instagram Accounts p.635.5 The Remuneration Motives for the Three Instagram Accounts p.655.6 Empowerment Motives for the Three Instagram Accounts p.665.7 Research Contributions p.675.8 Limitations and Future Research p.68References p.71Appendix 1. Survey p.82 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1651649 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107461003 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社群媒體 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Instagram zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 使用與滿足研究 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社群經營動機 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 多重帳號 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social media en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Instagram en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Uses and gratifications theory en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Account management en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Multiple accounts en_US dc.title (題名) Instagram主帳號、副帳號與特殊帳號之經營動機研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Instagram Accounts Matter: Comparing the Motives for Maintaining Rinsta, Finsta, and Targeted Finsta Accounts en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Abbott, W., Donaghey, J., Hare, J., & Hopkins, P. (2013). An Instagram is worth a thousandwords: An industry panel and audience Q&A. Library Hi Tech News.Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they areand what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20(1), 1-48.Bartholomew, D. J., Knott, M., & Moustaki, I. (2011). Latent variable models and factoranalysis: A unified approach (Vol. 904). John Wiley & Sons.Baumeister, R. F. (1990). Suicide as escape from self. Psychological review, 97(1), 90.Baym, N. K. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community (Vol. 3): Sage.Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of consumer research, 15(2),139-168.Buffardi, L. E., & Campbell, W. K. (2008). Narcissism and social networking web sites.Personality and social psychology bulletin, 34(10), 1303-1314.Bewick, V., Cheek, L., & Ball, J. (2004). Statistics review 9: one-way analysis ofvariance. Critical care, 8(2), 1-7.Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do studentsuse facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343.Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2009). Understanding the sustainability of a virtualcommunity: model development and empirical test. Journal of Information Science,35(3), 279-298.Cheung, T. T. (2014). A study on motives, usage, self-presentation and number of followerson instagram.Clayton, R. B., Leshner, G., & Almond, A. (2015). The extended iSelf: The impact of iPhoneseparation on cognition, emotion, and physiology. Journal of computer-mediatedcommunication, 20(2), 119-135.Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Fourrecommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment,research, and evaluation, 10(1), 7.Courtois, C., Mechant, P., De Marez, L., & Verleye, G. (2009). Gratifications and seedingbehavior of online adolescents. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 15(1),109-137.Cupchik, G. C. (2011). The role of feeling in the Entertainment= Emotion formula. Journalof Media Psychology.Cushing, A. L. (2011). Self extension and the desire to preserve digital possessions.Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1),1-3.de Vries, L., Peluso, A. M., Romani, S., Leeflang, P. S., & Marcati, A. (2017). Explainingconsumer brand-related activities on social media: An investigation of the differentroles of self-expression and socializing motivations. Computers in Human Behavior,75, 272-282.Dewar, S., Islam, S., Resor, E., & Salehi, N. (2019). Finsta. Paper presented at the ExtendedAbstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model ofconsumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities.International journal of research in marketing, 21(3), 241-263.Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Fahy, J., & Goodman, S. (2015). Social media engagement behaviour:a uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3-4), 261-277. doi:10.1080/0965254x.2015.1095222Duffy, B. E., & Chan, N. K. (2019). “You never really know who’s looking”: Imaginedsurveillance across social media platforms. New Media & Society, 21(1), 119-138.Duffy, B. E., Pruchniewska, U., & Scolere, L. (2017). Platform-Specific Self-Branding. Paperpresented at the Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media &Society - #SMSociety17.Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentationprocesses in the online dating environment. Journal of computer-mediatedcommunication, 11(2), 415-441.Enberg, J. (2020, December 8). Global Instagram Users 2020. Insider Intelligence.https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-instagram-users-2020.Füller, J. (2006). Why consumers engage in virtual new product developments initiated byproducers. ACR North American Advances.Gao, W., Liu, Z., & Li, J. (2017). How does social presence influence SNS addiction? Abelongingness theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 347-355.Gerald, B. (2018). A brief review of independent, dependent and one sample ttest.International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, 4(2), 50-54.Goffman, E. (1959). 1990. The presentation of self in everyday life. London:Harmondsworth.(Reprinted, London: Penguin Books 1990).Goh, D. H.-L., Ang, R. P., Chua, A. Y., & Lee, C. S. (2009). Why we share: A study ofmotivations for mobile media sharing. Paper presented at the International Conferenceon Active Media Technology.Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychologicalreview, 94(3), 319.Hollenbeck, C. R., & Kaikati, A. M. (2012). Consumers` use of brands to reflect their actualand ideal selves on Facebook. International journal of research in marketing, 29(4),395-405. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.06.002Huang, Y.-T., & Su, S.-F. (2018). Motives for Instagram Use and Topics of Interest amongYoung Adults. Future Internet, 10(8). doi:10.3390/fi10080077Hur, M. H. (2006). Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: Exploring a typologyof the process and components across disciplines. Journal of community psychology,34(5), 523-540.Hwang, H. S., & Cho, J. (2018). Why Instagram? Intention to continue using Instagramamong Korean college students. Social Behavior and Personality: an internationaljournal, 46(8), 1305-1315.Instagram. (2021). Getting Started on Instagram for Business. Instagram for Business.https://business.instagram.com/getting-started.Islam, J. U., & Rahman, Z. (2017). The impact of online brand community characteristics oncustomer engagement: An application of Stimulus-Organism-Response paradigm.Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 96-109.Jang, J. Y., Han, K., Lee, D., Jia, H., & Shih, P. C. (2016). Teens engage more with fewerphotos: temporal and comparative analysis on behaviors in instagram. Paperpresented at the Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and SocialMedia.Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educationaland psychological measurement, 20(1), 141-151.Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401-415.Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.Kang, J., & Wei, L. (2020). Let me be at my funniest: Instagram users’ motivations for usingFinsta (a.k.a., fake Instagram). The Social Science Journal, 57(1), 58-71.doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2018.12.005Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The publicopinion quarterly, 37(4), 509-523.Katz, R. (1984). Empowerment and synergy: Expanding the community`s healing resources.Prevention in human services, 3(2-3), 201-226.Kemp, S. (2021, February 11). Digital in Taiwan: All the statistics you need in 2021 -DataReportal – global digital insights. DataReportal. Retrieved December 18, 2021,from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-taiwanKim, B., & Kim, Y. (2019). Facebook versus Instagram: How perceived gratifications andtechnological attributes are related to the change in social media usage. The SocialScience Journal, 56(2), 156-167.Lee, C. S., Bakar, N. A. B. A., Dahri, R. B. M., & Sin, S.-C. J. (2015). Instagram this!Sharing photos on Instagram. Paper presented at the International Conference onAsian Digital Libraries.Lee, E., Lee, J. A., Moon, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures Speak Louder than Words:Motivations for Using Instagram. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 18(9), 552-556.doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0157Leung, L. (2009). User-generated content on the internet: an examination of gratifications,civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society, 11(8),1327-1347.Li, Z. (2016). Psychological empowerment on social media: who are the empowered users?Public Relations Review, 42(1), 49-59.MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factoranalysis. Psychological methods, 4(1), 84.Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Selfpresentationand gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,29(6), 446-458.Marcus, S. (2015). Picturing`ourselves into being: assessing identity, sociality and visualityon Instagram. Paper presented at the international communication associationconference.Marx, G. T. (2016). Windows into the soul: Surveillance and society in an age of hightechnology: University of Chicago Press.McCay-Peet, L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2016). A Model of Social Media Engagement: UserProfiles, Gratifications, and Experiences. In Why Engagement Matters (pp. 199-217).McQuail, D. (1983). Mass communication theory: An introduction. London: SagePublications.McQuail, D., Blumler, J., & Brown, J. (1972). (1972) The Television Audience: A RevisedPerspective. In D. McQuail, Sociology of Mass Communications. Middlesex,England: Penguin, 135-165.Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(4), 357-364.Michikyan, M., Dennis, J., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2015). Can you guess who I am? Real,ideal, and false self-presentation on Facebook among emerging adults. EmergingAdulthood, 3(1), 55-64.Muntinga, D. G., Moorman, M., & Smit, E. G. (2015). Introducing COBRAs. InternationalJournal of Advertising, 30(1), 13-46. doi:10.2501/ija-30-1-013-046Muralidharan, S., & Men, L. R. (2015). How peer communication and engagementmotivations influence social media shopping behavior: Evidence from China and theUnited States. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(10), 595-601.Nov, O. (2007). What motivates Wikipedians? Communications of the ACM, 50(11), 60-64.doi:10.1145/1297797.1297798Orchard, L. J., Fullwood, C., Galbraith, N., & Morris, N. (2014). Individual differences aspredictors of social networking. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 19(3),388-402.Palmgreen, P., & Rayburn, J. D. (1979). Uses and gratifications and exposure to publictelevision: A discrepancy approach. Communication Research, 6(2), 155-179.Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networkingenvironment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes.Cyberpsychology & behavior, 12(6), 729-733.Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (2017a). Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,or Snapchat to follow brands: The moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tiestrength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brandcommitment, and membership intention. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 412-424.doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.004Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (2017b). Uses and gratifications of social networking sites forbridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,and Snapchat. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 115-122.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041Qamar, A. M., & Alassaf, M. (2020). Improving Sentiment Analysis of Arabic Tweets byOne-Way ANOVA. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and InformationSciences.Ross, S. (2019). Being Real on Fake Instagram: Likes, Images, and Media Ideologies ofValue. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 29(3), 359-374. doi:10.1111/jola.12224Rummel, R. J. (1988). Applied factor analysis. Northwestern University Press.Rubin, A. M. (1986). Uses, gratifications, and media effects research. Perspectives on mediaeffects, 281-301.Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Masscommunication & society, 3(1), 3-37.Sangwan, S. (2005). Virtual community success: A uses and gratifications perspective. Paperpresented at the Proceedings of the 38th annual hawaii international conference onsystem sciences.Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personalityinfluences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences,54(3), 402-407.Sheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship tonarcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89-97.doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059Sivadas, E., & Machleit, K. A. (1994). A scale to determine the extent of object incorporationin the extended self. Marketing theory and applications, 5(1), 143-149.Song, Y.-A., Lee, S. Y., & Kim, Y. (2019). Does mindset matter for using social networkingsites?: understanding motivations for and uses of Instagram with growth versus fixedmindset. International Journal of Advertising, 38(6), 886-904.Sta ̊ hle, L., & Wold, S. (1989). Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Che- mometrics andIntelligent Laboratory Systems, 6, 259–272.Sung, Y., Lee, J.-A., Kim, E., & Choi, S. M. (2016). Why we post selfies: Understandingmotivations for posting pictures of oneself. Personality and Individual Differences,97, 260-265.Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An“interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review,15(4), 666-681.Thorlakson, A. J., & Murray, R. P. (1996). An empirical study of empowerment in theworkplace. Group & Organization Management, 21(1), 67-83.Ting, H., Ming, W. W. P., de Run, E. C., & Choo, S. L. Y. (2015). Beliefs about the use ofInstagram: An exploratory study. International Journal of business and innovation,2(2), 15-31.Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding theuse of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers inHuman Behavior, 27(2), 705-713.Trottier, D. (2016). Social media as surveillance: Rethinking visibility in a converging world:Routledge.van der Nagel, E. (2018). Alts and automediality: compartmentalising the self throughmultiple social media profiles. M/C Journal, 21(2).Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2003). Assessing motivation of contribution in onlinecommunities: An empirical investigation of an online travel community. Electronicmarkets, 13(1), 33-45.Wathieu, L., Brenner, L., Carmon, Z., Chattopadhyay, A., Wertenbroch, K., Drolet, A., ... &Wu, G. (2002). ConsumerControlAndEmpowerment.Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Net-surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual communities ascommunities. Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities,10(3), 34-60.Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratificationsapproach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362-369.doi:10.1108/qmr-06-2013-0041Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantagesof online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and websurvey services. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 10(3), JCMC1034.Xiao, S., Metaxa, D., Park, J. S., Karahalios, K., & Salehi, N. (2020). Random, Messy, Funny,Raw: Finstas as Intimate Reconfigurations of Social Media. Paper presented at theProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing onexploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 9(2),79-94.Young, N. L., Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Howard, C. J. (2017). Passive Facebook use,Facebook addiction, and associations with escapism: An experimental vignette study.Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 24-31.Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digitalempowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1816-1836.Zheng, X., Cheung, C. M., Lee, M. K., & Liang, L. (2015). Building brand loyalty throughuser engagement in online brand communities in social networking sites. InformationTechnology & People.Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. Self-efficacy inchanging societies, 1, 202-231.Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, andpsychological empowerment. American Journal of community psychology, 16(5),725-750.Zolkepli, I. A., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2014). The Antecedents of Social Media Adoption.ECSM 2014 University of Brighton Brighton, UK 10-11 July 2014, 594. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202200518 en_US