學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 新傳播科技下在家工作者之社會臨場感、主管支持與工作滿意度
Work-From-Home Employees’ Social Presence, Supervisor Support and Job Satisfaction under the New Communication Technologies
作者 黎威梆
Lai, Wei-Bang
貢獻者 韓義興
HAN, YI-HSING
黎威梆
Lai, Wei-Bang
關鍵詞 在家工作者
社會臨場感
主管支持
工作滿意度
Work-from-home employees
Social presence
Supervisor support
Job satisfaction
日期 2022
上傳時間 5-Oct-2022 09:02:51 (UTC+8)
摘要 自從新冠病毒在台擴散,許多企業為維持日常運作紛紛啟動了Work From Home(在家工作)的緊急措施。研究者作為新冠疫情期間的一名在家工作者,從自身的觀察發現,在家工作期間在新傳播科技的使用下,發現員工與主管間的關係建立與互動有了不少的變化,因此想藉此探討新傳播科技下在家工作者所感知的社會臨場感,主管支持與工作滿意度之間的關係。

本研究採線上問卷調查法,並找尋了在台且符合在家工作者條件的受試者。本研究於民國111年3月結束了問卷的預試,完成修正後就於同年的6月完成了最終問卷的發放,順利回收470份的有效問卷。研究結果與Zhang, Lu, Gupta & Zhao(2014)、Richardson, Maeda, Lv & Caskurlu(2017)等學者相同,也發現:(1)當在家工作者所感知的社會臨場感越高,主管支持(情感性、工具性、資訊性和評估性支持)則會越高;(2)當在家工作者所感知的社會臨場感越高,工作滿意度亦會變高;(3)當在家工作者所感知的主管支持(評估性支持)越高,工作滿意度同樣會變高;(4)主管支持(評估性支持)會中介社會臨場感與工作滿意度之間的關係。

此研究探討了2022年間在台在家工作者的現況與困境,也建議在家工作者應擁有良好的工作設備與環境外,也能多善用新傳播科技和主管互動以提升社會臨場感。另外,也建議公司主管能多給予支持與肯定員工(評估性支持)於在家工作期間的努力與表現即可有效提升在家工作者的工作滿意度。
Since the beginning of the spread of the coronavirus in Taiwan, many companies began to allow their employees to work from home. As a work-from-home employee during the pandemic period himself, the researcher observed that the use of new communication technologies appeared to have changed relationships and interactions between employees and supervisors. As such, this study explores if and how the use of new communication technologies used during the pandemic impacted the relationship between social presence, supervisor support, and overall job satisfaction.

This study administered an online questionnaire survey to subject participants in Taiwan who met the conditions of work-from-home employees. The pretest of the questionnaire was originally completed in March 2022, and being revised shortly thereafter. After its distribution in June 2022, the final questionnaire was completed by a total of 470 participants. Results from this survey agreed with existing research from Zhang, Lu, Gupta & Zhao (2014), Richardson, Maeda, Lv, & Caskurlu (2017), and other scholars, finding that (1) Social presence impacts the supervisor support (Emotional Support, Information Support, Instrumental Support, Appraisal Support) positively. (2) Social presence impacts job satisfaction positively. (3) Supervisor support (Appraisal Support) impacts job satisfaction positively. (4) Supervisor support (Appraisal Support) has a mediating effect between social presence and job satisfaction.

Based on its multimodal analysis of Taiwan’s current work-from-home environment, this research offers the following suggestions which may address challenges faced by work-from-home employees: (1) Work-from-home employees should have access to a quality work environment and associated equipment. (2) Companies should employ and encourage the use of modern communication technology to enhance social presence and effective communication with management. (3) To improve job satisfaction of work-from-home employees, management should provide more support and affirmation of employees` efforts and performance (Appraisal Support) during the work-from-home period.
參考文獻 一零四資訊科技股份有限公司(2022年1月26日)。WFH工作數3年成長4.6倍 為何6成有經驗的企業認為是雙面刃。104人力銀行,取自https://pro.104.com.tw/vip/preLogin/recruiterForum/post/56331
江嘉軒(2004)。《虛擬社群網站使用動機與社會臨場感研究》。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
江睿智(2021年3月7日)。遠距工作 75%勞工不易執行。經濟日報,取自https://money.udn.com/money/story/8888/5299610
周頌宜(2021年6月16日)。遠距工作大調查:主管面臨 3 大管理困難、焦慮感激增,有哪些解決之道?。經理人,取自https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/63186
張偉斌、何政勳、溫信財、林玉珊(2020)。〈公共衛生護理人員工作壓力、主管支持與工作滿意之相關性〉。《北市醫學雜誌》,17(4):412-424。
陳亭羽、潘曉慧、崔哲偉(2007)。遙距臨場感與想像力生動程度對數位學習效果之影響。經營管理論叢,113-138。
陳映璇(2020年10月19日)。疫情下當紅炸子雞!Zoom亞太業務成長573%,走出資安泥淖後,下一步要做到比擬真人會議。數位時代,取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/59676/zoom-video-conferencing-future?
陳婕翎、江慧珺(2021年5月19日)。全台疫情警戒升第三級至28日 20日起每日舉行全國防疫會議。中央社,取自https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202105195009.aspx
陳燕玲(2007)。〈電腦中介傳播下的社會臨場感與信任關係〉。簡報於「2007第四屆數位創世紀學術與實務研討會」。社團法人中華白絲帶關懷協會,取自http://www.cyberangel.org.tw/thesis/2007/004.pdf
葉俊宏(2017)。《主管轉換型領導風格與員工工作滿意對離職傾向的影響》。龍華科技大學企業管理系碩士班碩士論文。
會計研究月刊編輯部(2021年8月)。回不去的WFH?遠距工作線上調查。會計研究月刊,429,58。
Alderfer, C. P. (1968). [Review of Managerial Attitudes and Performance., by L. W. Porter & E. E. Lawler]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 177-180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391269
Anderson, S. E., Coffey, B. S., & Byerly, R. T. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28(6), 787-810.
Andy, C., & Diane, H. (2020, May 26). Work From Home Survey 2020. Gensler’s U.S. Retrieved from https://www.gensler.com/blog/insights-from-genslers-u-s-work-from-home-survey-2020
Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(5), 40-56.
Aragon, S. R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New directions for adult and continuing education, 2003(100), 57-68.
Babin, B. J., & Boles, J. S. (1996). The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and
supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 72(1), 57-75.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
Blum, M. L., & Naylor, J. C (1968). Industrial psychology: Its theoretical and social foundation. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. In K. A.
Bollen & J. S. Long, (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Charoensukmongkol, P., Moqbel, M., & Gutierrez-Wirsching, S. (2016). The role of
coworker and supervisor support on job burnout and job satisfaction. Journal of Advances in Management Research.
Chou, R. J. A., & Robert, S. A. (2008). Workplace support, role overload, and job satisfaction
of direct care workers in assisted living. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49(2), 208-222.
Collins, A. M., Hislop, D., & Cartwright, S. (2016). Social support in the workplace between teleworkers, office‐based colleagues and supervisors. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(2), 161-175.
Cowin, L. (2002). The effects of nurses’ job satisfaction on retention: an Australian perspective. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 32(5), 283-291.
Cui, G. (2013). Evaluating online social presence: An overview of social presence assessment. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 6(1), 13-30.
Davis, K., & Nestrom, J.W. (1985). Human behavior at work: Organizational behavior (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Dingel, J. I., & Neiman, B. (2020). How many jobs can be done at home?. Journal of Public Economics, 189, 104235.
Downes, M., Thomas, A. S., & Singley, R. B. (2002). Predicting expatriate job satisfaction: the role of firm internationalization. Career Development International, 7(1), 24-36.
Durham, C. C., Knight, D., & Locke, E. A. (1997). Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(2), 203-231.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), 500.
Fenlason, K. J., & Beehr, T. A. (1994). Social support and occupational stress: Effects of talking to others. Journal of organizational behavior, 15(2), 157-175.
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524.
George, J.M., & Jones, G.R. (2008). Understanding and Managing Organizational behavior (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
Gok, S., Karatuna, I., & Karaca, P. O. (2015). The role of perceived supervisor support and organizational identification in job satisfaction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 38-42.
Golden, T. D., & Fromen, A. (2011). Does it matter where your manager works? Comparing managerial work mode (traditional, telework, virtual) across subordinate work experiences and outcomes. Human Relations, 64(11), 1451-1475.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of management journal, 50(2), 327-347.
Griffin, M. A., Patterson, M. G., & West, M. A. (2001). Job satisfaction and teamwork: The role of supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 22(5), 537-550.
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
Harms, C., & Biocca, F. (2004). Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds measure of social presence. In Seventh annual international workshop: Presence (Vol. 2004). Universidad Politecnica de Valencia Valencia, Spain.
Hill, E. J., Miller, B. C., Weiner, S. P., & Colihan, J. (1998). Influences of the virtual office on aspects of work and work/life balance. Personnel psychology, 51(3), 667-683.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York, NY: Harper.
Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2006). Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1-12.
House, J. S. (1983). Work stress and social support. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Hutchison, S., Valentino, K. E., & Kirkner, S. L. (1998). What works for the gander does not work as well for the goose: The effects of leader behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(2), 171-182.
Ice, P., Swan, K., Kupczynski, L., & Richardson, J. (2008). The impact of asynchronous audio feedback on teaching and social presence: A survey of current research. Paper presented at World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Vienna, Austria.
Kahai, S. S., Huang, R., & Jestice, R. J. (2012). Interaction effect of leadership and communication media on feedback positivity in virtual teams. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 716-751.
Keil, M., & Johnson, R. D. (2002). Feedback channels: Using social presence theory to compare voice mail to e-mail. Journal of Information Systems Education, 13(4), 295.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
Konradt, U., Hertel, G., & Schmook, R. (2003). Quality of management by objectives, task-related stressors, and non-task-related stressors as predictors of stress and job satisfaction among teleworkers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 61-79.
Kottke, J. L., & Sharafinski, C. E. (1988). Measuring perceived supervisory and organizational support. Educational and psychological Measurement, 48(4), 1075-1079.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 8-22.
Lawrence, S. A., Gardner, J., & Callan, V. J. (2007). The support appraisal for work stressors inventory: Construction and initial validation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(1), 172-204.
Locke, E. A. (1973). Satisfiers and dissatisfiers among white-collar and blue-collar employees. Journal of applied Psychology, 58(1), 67.
Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2010). From pixel on a screen to real person in your students` lives: Establishing social presence using digital storytelling. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 70-72.
Lowenthal, P. R., & Snelson, C. (2017). In search of a better understanding of social presence: an investigation into how researchers define social presence. Distance Education, 38(2), 141-159.
Miranda, S. M., & Saunders, C. S. (2003). The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 87-106.
Mokoena, S. (2013). Engagement with and participation in online discussion Forums. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(2), 97-105.
Mullins, J.L. (2005). Management and organizational behavior (7th ed.). London: Pearson education.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Teleworking in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Trends and Prospects.

Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous learning networks, 6(1), 21-40.
Portela, D. M. P. (2012). Contributo das técnicas de análise fatorial para o estudo do programa" ocupação científica de jovens nas férias"
Price, J. L. (1972). Handbook of organizational measurement. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
Randall, M. L., Cropanzano, R., Bormann, C. A., & Birjulin, A. (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of organizational behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 20(2), 159-174.
Reio Jr, T. G., & Crim, S. J. (2013). Social presence and student satisfaction as predictors of online enrollment intent. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(2), 122-133.
Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 451-484.
Richardson, J. C. (2001). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students` perceived learning and satisfaction. State University of New York at Albany
Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students` satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402-417.
Roberts, T. L., Lowry, P. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (2006). An evaluation of the impact of social presence through group size and the use of collaborative software on group member "voice" in face-to-face and computer-mediated task groups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49(1), 28-43.
Scott, K. D., & Taylor, G. S. (1985). An examination of conflicting findings on the relationship between job satisfaction and absenteeism: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 599-612.
Seashore, S. E., & Taber, T. D. (1975). Job satisfaction and their correlations. American Behavior & Scientists, 18(3), 333-368
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & education, 51(1), 318-336.
Susskind, A. M., Kacmar, K. M., & Borchgrevink, C. P. (2003). Customer service providers` attitudes relating to customer service and customer satisfaction in the customer-server exchange. Journal of applied psychology, 88(1), 179.
Thompson, E. R., & Phua, F. T. (2012). A brief index of affective job satisfaction. Group & Organization Management, 37(3), 275-307.
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication. Sage.
Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150.
Tu, C., & Yen, C. (2007). A study of the relationship between computer-mediated communication proficiency and online social presence. In annual conference of AERA, Chicago, IL.
Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. The Internet and higher education, 8(1), 1-12.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: John Willey & Sons, Inc.
Watkins, M. (2006). Perceived supervisor support as a mediator of the relationships between supervisor behaviors and subordinate attitudes. Los Angeles, CA: Alliant International University.
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
Westmyer, S. A., DiCioccio, R. L., & Rubin, R. B. (1998). Appropriateness and effectiveness of communication channels in competent interpersonal communication. Journal of communication, 48(3), 27-48.
Wilkins, A. M. (2019). The Relationship of Manager Social Presence and Social Support on Job Satisfaction of Virtual Employees (Doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University).
Yoomi, P. (2020, December 15). Remote work anxiety and burnout. Blind Blog - Workplace
Insights. Retrieved from https://www.teamblind.com/blog/index.php/2020/12/15/2020-recap-part-2-remote-work-anxiety-and-burnout/
Yoon, J., & Thye, S. (2000). Supervisor support in the work place: Legitimacy and positive affectivity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(3), 295-316.
Yuki, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251-289.
Zhang, H., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., & Zhao, L. (2014). What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? The impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences. Information & Management, 51(8), 1017-1030.
Zoom Video Communications(2021). Report: The Impact of Video Communications During COVID-19. Retrieved from https://explore.zoom.us/docs/en-us/bcg-report.html
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
107464055
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107464055
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 韓義興zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor HAN, YI-HSINGen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黎威梆zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lai, Wei-Bangen_US
dc.creator (作者) 黎威梆zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lai, Wei-Bangen_US
dc.date (日期) 2022en_US
dc.date.accessioned 5-Oct-2022 09:02:51 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 5-Oct-2022 09:02:51 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-Oct-2022 09:02:51 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0107464055en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/142074-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 107464055zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 自從新冠病毒在台擴散,許多企業為維持日常運作紛紛啟動了Work From Home(在家工作)的緊急措施。研究者作為新冠疫情期間的一名在家工作者,從自身的觀察發現,在家工作期間在新傳播科技的使用下,發現員工與主管間的關係建立與互動有了不少的變化,因此想藉此探討新傳播科技下在家工作者所感知的社會臨場感,主管支持與工作滿意度之間的關係。

本研究採線上問卷調查法,並找尋了在台且符合在家工作者條件的受試者。本研究於民國111年3月結束了問卷的預試,完成修正後就於同年的6月完成了最終問卷的發放,順利回收470份的有效問卷。研究結果與Zhang, Lu, Gupta & Zhao(2014)、Richardson, Maeda, Lv & Caskurlu(2017)等學者相同,也發現:(1)當在家工作者所感知的社會臨場感越高,主管支持(情感性、工具性、資訊性和評估性支持)則會越高;(2)當在家工作者所感知的社會臨場感越高,工作滿意度亦會變高;(3)當在家工作者所感知的主管支持(評估性支持)越高,工作滿意度同樣會變高;(4)主管支持(評估性支持)會中介社會臨場感與工作滿意度之間的關係。

此研究探討了2022年間在台在家工作者的現況與困境,也建議在家工作者應擁有良好的工作設備與環境外,也能多善用新傳播科技和主管互動以提升社會臨場感。另外,也建議公司主管能多給予支持與肯定員工(評估性支持)於在家工作期間的努力與表現即可有效提升在家工作者的工作滿意度。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Since the beginning of the spread of the coronavirus in Taiwan, many companies began to allow their employees to work from home. As a work-from-home employee during the pandemic period himself, the researcher observed that the use of new communication technologies appeared to have changed relationships and interactions between employees and supervisors. As such, this study explores if and how the use of new communication technologies used during the pandemic impacted the relationship between social presence, supervisor support, and overall job satisfaction.

This study administered an online questionnaire survey to subject participants in Taiwan who met the conditions of work-from-home employees. The pretest of the questionnaire was originally completed in March 2022, and being revised shortly thereafter. After its distribution in June 2022, the final questionnaire was completed by a total of 470 participants. Results from this survey agreed with existing research from Zhang, Lu, Gupta & Zhao (2014), Richardson, Maeda, Lv, & Caskurlu (2017), and other scholars, finding that (1) Social presence impacts the supervisor support (Emotional Support, Information Support, Instrumental Support, Appraisal Support) positively. (2) Social presence impacts job satisfaction positively. (3) Supervisor support (Appraisal Support) impacts job satisfaction positively. (4) Supervisor support (Appraisal Support) has a mediating effect between social presence and job satisfaction.

Based on its multimodal analysis of Taiwan’s current work-from-home environment, this research offers the following suggestions which may address challenges faced by work-from-home employees: (1) Work-from-home employees should have access to a quality work environment and associated equipment. (2) Companies should employ and encourage the use of modern communication technology to enhance social presence and effective communication with management. (3) To improve job satisfaction of work-from-home employees, management should provide more support and affirmation of employees` efforts and performance (Appraisal Support) during the work-from-home period.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝誌 I
摘要 II
目次 IV
表次 VI
圖次 VII

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 5

第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 社會臨場感理論 6
第二節 主管支持 11
第三節 工作滿意度 13
第四節 主管支持作為中介變項 16

第三章 研究方法與設計 17
第一節 研究對象與研究操作 17
第二節 研究架構與假設 18
第三節 研究設計 19
第四節 預試問卷結果與修正 27

第四章 研究結果 28
第一節 樣本人口基本資料與工作現況之敘述 28
第二節 信度分析 35
第三節 整體結構模型分析 37
第四節 中介分析結果與其他發現 44
第五節 研究假設驗證結果整理 46

第五章 結論與建議 47
第一節 研究結果討論 47
第二節 研究貢獻 52
第三節 研究限制與未來建議 55

參考文獻 57
附錄一 正式問卷 65
附錄二 預試問卷信度檢測結果 73
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1516080 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107464055en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 在家工作者zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會臨場感zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 主管支持zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 工作滿意度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Work-from-home employeesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social presenceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Supervisor supporten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Job satisfactionen_US
dc.title (題名) 新傳播科技下在家工作者之社會臨場感、主管支持與工作滿意度zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Work-From-Home Employees’ Social Presence, Supervisor Support and Job Satisfaction under the New Communication Technologiesen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一零四資訊科技股份有限公司(2022年1月26日)。WFH工作數3年成長4.6倍 為何6成有經驗的企業認為是雙面刃。104人力銀行,取自https://pro.104.com.tw/vip/preLogin/recruiterForum/post/56331
江嘉軒(2004)。《虛擬社群網站使用動機與社會臨場感研究》。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
江睿智(2021年3月7日)。遠距工作 75%勞工不易執行。經濟日報,取自https://money.udn.com/money/story/8888/5299610
周頌宜(2021年6月16日)。遠距工作大調查:主管面臨 3 大管理困難、焦慮感激增,有哪些解決之道?。經理人,取自https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/63186
張偉斌、何政勳、溫信財、林玉珊(2020)。〈公共衛生護理人員工作壓力、主管支持與工作滿意之相關性〉。《北市醫學雜誌》,17(4):412-424。
陳亭羽、潘曉慧、崔哲偉(2007)。遙距臨場感與想像力生動程度對數位學習效果之影響。經營管理論叢,113-138。
陳映璇(2020年10月19日)。疫情下當紅炸子雞!Zoom亞太業務成長573%,走出資安泥淖後,下一步要做到比擬真人會議。數位時代,取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/59676/zoom-video-conferencing-future?
陳婕翎、江慧珺(2021年5月19日)。全台疫情警戒升第三級至28日 20日起每日舉行全國防疫會議。中央社,取自https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202105195009.aspx
陳燕玲(2007)。〈電腦中介傳播下的社會臨場感與信任關係〉。簡報於「2007第四屆數位創世紀學術與實務研討會」。社團法人中華白絲帶關懷協會,取自http://www.cyberangel.org.tw/thesis/2007/004.pdf
葉俊宏(2017)。《主管轉換型領導風格與員工工作滿意對離職傾向的影響》。龍華科技大學企業管理系碩士班碩士論文。
會計研究月刊編輯部(2021年8月)。回不去的WFH?遠距工作線上調查。會計研究月刊,429,58。
Alderfer, C. P. (1968). [Review of Managerial Attitudes and Performance., by L. W. Porter & E. E. Lawler]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 177-180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391269
Anderson, S. E., Coffey, B. S., & Byerly, R. T. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28(6), 787-810.
Andy, C., & Diane, H. (2020, May 26). Work From Home Survey 2020. Gensler’s U.S. Retrieved from https://www.gensler.com/blog/insights-from-genslers-u-s-work-from-home-survey-2020
Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(5), 40-56.
Aragon, S. R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New directions for adult and continuing education, 2003(100), 57-68.
Babin, B. J., & Boles, J. S. (1996). The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and
supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 72(1), 57-75.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
Blum, M. L., & Naylor, J. C (1968). Industrial psychology: Its theoretical and social foundation. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. In K. A.
Bollen & J. S. Long, (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Charoensukmongkol, P., Moqbel, M., & Gutierrez-Wirsching, S. (2016). The role of
coworker and supervisor support on job burnout and job satisfaction. Journal of Advances in Management Research.
Chou, R. J. A., & Robert, S. A. (2008). Workplace support, role overload, and job satisfaction
of direct care workers in assisted living. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49(2), 208-222.
Collins, A. M., Hislop, D., & Cartwright, S. (2016). Social support in the workplace between teleworkers, office‐based colleagues and supervisors. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(2), 161-175.
Cowin, L. (2002). The effects of nurses’ job satisfaction on retention: an Australian perspective. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 32(5), 283-291.
Cui, G. (2013). Evaluating online social presence: An overview of social presence assessment. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 6(1), 13-30.
Davis, K., & Nestrom, J.W. (1985). Human behavior at work: Organizational behavior (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Dingel, J. I., & Neiman, B. (2020). How many jobs can be done at home?. Journal of Public Economics, 189, 104235.
Downes, M., Thomas, A. S., & Singley, R. B. (2002). Predicting expatriate job satisfaction: the role of firm internationalization. Career Development International, 7(1), 24-36.
Durham, C. C., Knight, D., & Locke, E. A. (1997). Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(2), 203-231.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), 500.
Fenlason, K. J., & Beehr, T. A. (1994). Social support and occupational stress: Effects of talking to others. Journal of organizational behavior, 15(2), 157-175.
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524.
George, J.M., & Jones, G.R. (2008). Understanding and Managing Organizational behavior (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
Gok, S., Karatuna, I., & Karaca, P. O. (2015). The role of perceived supervisor support and organizational identification in job satisfaction. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 38-42.
Golden, T. D., & Fromen, A. (2011). Does it matter where your manager works? Comparing managerial work mode (traditional, telework, virtual) across subordinate work experiences and outcomes. Human Relations, 64(11), 1451-1475.
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of management journal, 50(2), 327-347.
Griffin, M. A., Patterson, M. G., & West, M. A. (2001). Job satisfaction and teamwork: The role of supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 22(5), 537-550.
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
Harms, C., & Biocca, F. (2004). Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds measure of social presence. In Seventh annual international workshop: Presence (Vol. 2004). Universidad Politecnica de Valencia Valencia, Spain.
Hill, E. J., Miller, B. C., Weiner, S. P., & Colihan, J. (1998). Influences of the virtual office on aspects of work and work/life balance. Personnel psychology, 51(3), 667-683.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York, NY: Harper.
Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2006). Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1-12.
House, J. S. (1983). Work stress and social support. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Hutchison, S., Valentino, K. E., & Kirkner, S. L. (1998). What works for the gander does not work as well for the goose: The effects of leader behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(2), 171-182.
Ice, P., Swan, K., Kupczynski, L., & Richardson, J. (2008). The impact of asynchronous audio feedback on teaching and social presence: A survey of current research. Paper presented at World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Vienna, Austria.
Kahai, S. S., Huang, R., & Jestice, R. J. (2012). Interaction effect of leadership and communication media on feedback positivity in virtual teams. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 716-751.
Keil, M., & Johnson, R. D. (2002). Feedback channels: Using social presence theory to compare voice mail to e-mail. Journal of Information Systems Education, 13(4), 295.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
Konradt, U., Hertel, G., & Schmook, R. (2003). Quality of management by objectives, task-related stressors, and non-task-related stressors as predictors of stress and job satisfaction among teleworkers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 61-79.
Kottke, J. L., & Sharafinski, C. E. (1988). Measuring perceived supervisory and organizational support. Educational and psychological Measurement, 48(4), 1075-1079.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 8-22.
Lawrence, S. A., Gardner, J., & Callan, V. J. (2007). The support appraisal for work stressors inventory: Construction and initial validation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(1), 172-204.
Locke, E. A. (1973). Satisfiers and dissatisfiers among white-collar and blue-collar employees. Journal of applied Psychology, 58(1), 67.
Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2010). From pixel on a screen to real person in your students` lives: Establishing social presence using digital storytelling. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 70-72.
Lowenthal, P. R., & Snelson, C. (2017). In search of a better understanding of social presence: an investigation into how researchers define social presence. Distance Education, 38(2), 141-159.
Miranda, S. M., & Saunders, C. S. (2003). The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 87-106.
Mokoena, S. (2013). Engagement with and participation in online discussion Forums. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(2), 97-105.
Mullins, J.L. (2005). Management and organizational behavior (7th ed.). London: Pearson education.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Teleworking in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Trends and Prospects.

Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous learning networks, 6(1), 21-40.
Portela, D. M. P. (2012). Contributo das técnicas de análise fatorial para o estudo do programa" ocupação científica de jovens nas férias"
Price, J. L. (1972). Handbook of organizational measurement. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
Randall, M. L., Cropanzano, R., Bormann, C. A., & Birjulin, A. (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of organizational behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 20(2), 159-174.
Reio Jr, T. G., & Crim, S. J. (2013). Social presence and student satisfaction as predictors of online enrollment intent. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(2), 122-133.
Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 451-484.
Richardson, J. C. (2001). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students` perceived learning and satisfaction. State University of New York at Albany
Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students` satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402-417.
Roberts, T. L., Lowry, P. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (2006). An evaluation of the impact of social presence through group size and the use of collaborative software on group member "voice" in face-to-face and computer-mediated task groups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49(1), 28-43.
Scott, K. D., & Taylor, G. S. (1985). An examination of conflicting findings on the relationship between job satisfaction and absenteeism: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 599-612.
Seashore, S. E., & Taber, T. D. (1975). Job satisfaction and their correlations. American Behavior & Scientists, 18(3), 333-368
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & education, 51(1), 318-336.
Susskind, A. M., Kacmar, K. M., & Borchgrevink, C. P. (2003). Customer service providers` attitudes relating to customer service and customer satisfaction in the customer-server exchange. Journal of applied psychology, 88(1), 179.
Thompson, E. R., & Phua, F. T. (2012). A brief index of affective job satisfaction. Group & Organization Management, 37(3), 275-307.
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication. Sage.
Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150.
Tu, C., & Yen, C. (2007). A study of the relationship between computer-mediated communication proficiency and online social presence. In annual conference of AERA, Chicago, IL.
Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. The Internet and higher education, 8(1), 1-12.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: John Willey & Sons, Inc.
Watkins, M. (2006). Perceived supervisor support as a mediator of the relationships between supervisor behaviors and subordinate attitudes. Los Angeles, CA: Alliant International University.
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
Westmyer, S. A., DiCioccio, R. L., & Rubin, R. B. (1998). Appropriateness and effectiveness of communication channels in competent interpersonal communication. Journal of communication, 48(3), 27-48.
Wilkins, A. M. (2019). The Relationship of Manager Social Presence and Social Support on Job Satisfaction of Virtual Employees (Doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University).
Yoomi, P. (2020, December 15). Remote work anxiety and burnout. Blind Blog - Workplace
Insights. Retrieved from https://www.teamblind.com/blog/index.php/2020/12/15/2020-recap-part-2-remote-work-anxiety-and-burnout/
Yoon, J., & Thye, S. (2000). Supervisor support in the work place: Legitimacy and positive affectivity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(3), 295-316.
Yuki, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251-289.
Zhang, H., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., & Zhao, L. (2014). What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? The impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences. Information & Management, 51(8), 1017-1030.
Zoom Video Communications(2021). Report: The Impact of Video Communications During COVID-19. Retrieved from https://explore.zoom.us/docs/en-us/bcg-report.html
zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202201653en_US