學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 臺灣離岸風電產業之技術追趕 – 以水下基礎為例
Technological catch-up of offshore wind power industry in Taiwan: The case of underwater foundation technology作者 劉誠翰
Liu, Cheng-Han貢獻者 柯玉佳
Ko, Yu-Chia
劉誠翰
Liu, Cheng-Han關鍵詞 離岸風電產業
技術追趕
機會之窗
產業創新系統
國產化政策
Offshore wind power industry
Technology catching-up
Window of opportunity
Sectoral system of innovation
Localization policy日期 2023 上傳時間 6-Jul-2023 16:23:09 (UTC+8) 摘要 隨著近年全球綠能趨勢，西元2016年臺灣政府公布2025非核家園新能源政策，訂定離岸風電為核心發展項目。同時為了建立本土離岸風電供應鏈，工業局於西元2017年也揭示離岸風力發電產業政策，預期透過政策誘因將供應鏈落實於國內。然而，離岸風電技術對於臺灣廠商而言為全新的領域，如何克服技術落差並把握相關機會，提升技術能力至國際水平，對離岸風電本土供應鏈之發展至關重要。本研究採用技術追趕以及機會之窗理論探究台灣本土風電供應商於技術落差下之樣態，然而，過往技術追趕理論相關文獻大多僅辨識出產義後進者之技術追趕現況，而機會之窗等相關文獻也無提及後進者於技術追趕上之現況，雖然提供了堅實的研究基礎，卻缺乏了整合性的概念，因此為了彌補上述文獻之缺口，本研究得以發展出嶄新的研究框架，整合技術追趕以及機會之窗之學術概念，為產業後進者提供克服技術落差之框架，以期達到成功之技術追趕。本研究以離岸風電產業中之水下基礎技術為例，選定世紀離岸風電設備股份有限公司為個案研究對象，進行深度訪談及次級資料搜集，透過本研究提出之理論框架，為臺灣離岸風電產業後進者提供得以克服技術落差之機會分析，並為我國離岸風電供應鏈國產化政策提供修正方向與後續建言。本研究最後得出的主要結論如下：一、世紀風電目前於水下基礎生產之兩大產品線（管架式水下基礎、水下基樁），因共享世紀風電企業資源與產線設施，可定義為技術框架中之第二階段。二、世紀風電因與技術先行者成立合資公司，於技術追趕上所遇到的困難並不是先行者拒絕轉讓授權或技術，而是根本技術能力上的落差，包含專案及文件管理、從業人才缺乏、焊接技術落差以及遵循規範差異。三、世紀風電可以從既有技術落差切入，從技術、需求、制度面把握機會之窗，追趕上國際先行者之水準。四、世紀風電若能持續維持積極之技術追趕作為，有了政策的支持以及國內外長遠之需求驅動，得以快速累積技術能力，達成成功技術追趕之目標。本論文也於最後進一步闡述本研究之學術貢獻，並提出管理意涵以及研究方向建議供未來研究參考。
With the global trend of green energy in recent years, the Taiwan government announced the 2025 non-nuclear homeland energy policy in 2016 and set offshore wind power as the core development project. At the same time, to establish a local offshore wind power supply chain, the Industrial Development Bureau also revealed the offshore wind power industry localization policy in 2017, expecting to implement the supply chain in Taiwan through policy incentives. However, offshore wind power technology is a brand new field for Taiwanese manufacturers. How to overcome the technological gap and seize the relevant opportunities to enhance the technological capability at the international level is crucial to the development of the local supply chain for offshore wind power.Nevertheless, most of the previous literature on technology catching-up theory only identifies the current status of technology catching-up of latecomers in the industrial sense, and literature on the window of opportunity does not mention the current status of latecomers in technology catching-up, which provides a solid basis for research but lacks an integrated concept. To fill the above-mentioned research gap, this study develops a new research framework that integrates the academic concepts of technology catching-up and window of opportunity to provide a framework for industry latecomers to overcome the technology gap in order to achieve a successful technology catching-up.This study selected the offshore wind underwater foundation of local manufacturer Century Wind Power Co., Ltd. as a case object for the in-depth research. Through semi-structured interviews and secondary data analysis to adapt the theoretical framework proposed in this study, we can provide an opportunity analysis for Taiwan`s offshore wind industry latecomers to overcome the technological gap and provide a revised direction and follow-up suggestions for the localization policy of Taiwan`s offshore wind supply chain. The conclusions of this study are as follows.1. The two major product lines of Century Wind Power Co., Ltd. current underwater foundation production ( Jacket foundation and Pinpile) can be defined as the second stage of the technical framework as they share the same resources and facilities.2. Since Century Wind Power Co., Ltd. has established a joint venture with a forerunner, the difficulty in catching up is not the refusal of the forerunner to transfer the license or technology, but the difference in fundamental technical capability, including project and document management, lack of personnel in the industry, challenging in welding technology, and difference in compliance with regulations.3. Century Wind Power Co., Ltd. can seize the window of opportunity in terms of technology, demand, and institutional to catch up with the international forerunner standard.4. With the policy support and long-term domestic and international demand, Century Wind Power Co., Ltd. can accumulate technical capability to achieve the goal of successful technology catch-up.At the end of this study, academic contributions, practical implications, and future research suggestions are future elaborated.參考文獻 中央社. (2020). 打造離岸風電新絲路 鋼鐵業淘綠金. 工商時報. https://ctee.com.tw/news/industry/205846.html王政憲. (2021). 永續轉型歷程中創新類型與社會科技體制的互動與變遷─ 以丹麥能源轉型與風機產業為例.王昱翔. (2021a). 大缺工下，焊接還得重學？「離岸風電國產化」陷困境. 遠見雜誌. https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/83336王昱翔. (2021b, 2021/11/2). 自己的人才自己養！「離岸風電國產化」缺工自救：台廠開課、徵年輕人. 遠見雜誌. https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/83832吳心恩. (2021). 離岸風電焊工與歐規接軌 世紀鋼構總工程師 吳江富：熬過了就是你的本事. Wind Taiwan 離岸風電雜誌 第十期, 92-95.吳心恩、施美旭. (2021). 離岸風電國產化目標大邁進 100%國產化水下基礎產製完成. Wind Taiwan 離岸風電雜誌 第十期, 26-29.吳心恩、龔鈴津. (2021). 水下基礎的決勝點 焊接. Wind Taiwan 離岸風電雜誌 第十期, 83-93.林文靖. (2021). 離岸風電水下基礎鋼構製造與檢驗要求概述. https://www.cima.org.tw/expert/blog202107-13/林淑馨. (2010). 質性研究：理論與實務. 巨流圖書股份有限公司.林菁樺. (2022). 世紀鋼再擴台北廠 總投資上看200億元. 自由時報. https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/3974552施文玲. (2006). 質性取向研究理論派典之探析. 網路社會學通訊期刊, 52.施美旭、陳妍伶. (2021). 分享與交流 厚實產業技術基底 水下基礎製造技術交流研討會登場. Wind Taiwan 離岸風電雜誌 第十一期, 28 - 37.范麗娟. (1994). 深度訪談簡介. 戶外遊憩研究, 7(2), 25-35.曹國興、汪立德. (2019). 離岸風電水下基礎之焊接工程及人員技能需求. 就業安全, 29-37.許尚溥. (2021). 企業再生能源購售電合約全球概況與展望. 台灣經濟研究院研究一所.陳文姿. (2018). Google都想搶的台灣第一張PPA 專家解析：為何要直接跟業者買綠電. 環境資訊中心.陳文姿. (2019). 愛河上可以蓋風機嗎？ 你所不知的「浮動式風機」 讓專家來解答. https://e-info.org.tw/node/221418陳向明. (2002). 社會科學質的研究. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.陳映璇. (2019). 打造離岸風電30層樓高「水下基礎」，興達海基將組400人焊接部隊拚進度. 數位時代 BUSINESS NEXT. https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/54662/sdms-jacket-foundation-for-orsted-offshore-wind陳映璇. (2022). 世紀鋼奪21座台灣最大水下基礎訂單！賴文祥：離岸風電是數十年都做不完的生意. 數位時代. https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/68295/century--jacket彭柏鈞. (2021). 台灣離岸風電水下基礎在地產業鏈. Wind Taiwan 離岸風電雜誌 第十期, 49-55.黃金城、樊庭宇、朱棟樑. (2019). 離岸風機水下結構的設計─海上巨型風扇的支撐者. 科學發展.新聞傳播處, 行.-. (2016). 為邁向2025非核家園目標 推動新能源政策. 行政院. https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F759E41CCD91/c094fb4e-6c07-4a87-9435-fb97f11dde10經濟部研究發展委員會. (2022). 離岸風電水下基礎產業技術升級輔導計畫.葉志誠、葉立誠. (2011). 研究方法與寫作. 商鼎數位.鄭偉成、林曉琪. (2019). 離岸風力機的雙腳─水下基礎技術簡述鄭斐文. (2021). 綠能與離岸風電並進 完善政策推動台灣能源轉型. DIGITIMES. https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=130&cat1=40&cat2=140&id=0000624074_UZ7LLJQQ8RTR673M5S754Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American economic review, 91(5), 1369-1401.Amann, E., & Cantwell, J. (2012). Innovative firms in emerging market countries. Oxford University Press.Amsden, A. H. (1992). Asia`s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford University Press on Demand.Amsden, A. H., & Chu, W.-w. (2003). Beyond late development: Taiwan`s upgrading policies. Mit Press.Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between.Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent`s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of marketing, 64(3), 1-17.Christensen, C. M. (2013). The innovator`s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research.Ernst, D. (2002). Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems. Implications for developing countries. Economics of innovation and new technology, 11(6), 497-523.Ernst, D., & Kim, L. (2002). Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1417-1429.Fagerberg, J. (1988). International competitiveness. The economic journal, 98(391), 355-374.Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M., & Verspagen, B. (2010). The role of innovation in development. Review of economics and institutions, 1(2).Freeman, R., Freeman, C., & Freeman, S. (1987). Technology, policy, and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Burns & Oates.Giachetti, C., & Marchi, G. (2017). Successive changes in leadership in the worldwide mobile phone industry: The role of windows of opportunity and firms’ competitive action. Research Policy, 46(2), 352-364.Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative science quarterly, 9-30.Hobday, M. (1995). Innovation in East Asia. Books.Katz, J. (1995). Domestic technology generation in less developed countries: a review of research findings. IDB/ECLA Research Program in Science and Technology.Kim, L. (1980). Stages of development of industrial technology in a developing country: a model. Research Policy, 9(3), 254-277.Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea`s technological learning. In: Harvard Business School PressKim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization science, 9(4), 506-521.Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: an economic evaluation of the global competitiveness report. World development, 29(9), 1501-1525.Lee, K. (2005). Making a Technological Catch‐up: Barriers and opportunities. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13(2), 97-131.Lee, K. (2010). What makes more successful and less successful technological catch-up: analyzing the 10 late-comer countries. International Schumpeter Society Conference,Lee, K., & Lim, C. (2001). Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, 30(3), 459-483.Lee, K., & Malerba, F. (2017). Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy, 46(2), 338-351.Lee, K., Park, T. Y., & Krishnan, R. T. (2014). Catching‐up or leapfrogging in the Indian IT service sector: Windows of opportunity, Path‐creating, and moving up the value chain. Development Policy Review, 32(4), 495-518.Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning.Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247-264.Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation: concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge University Press.Mathews, J. A. (2001). National systems of economic learning: The case of technology diffusion management in East Asia.Mathews, J. A. (2002). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific journal of management, 19(4), 467-488.Mathews, J. A. (2003). Competitive dynamics and economic learning: an extended resource‐based view. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(1), 115-145.Mathews, J. A. (2005). Strategy and the crystal cycle. California Management Review, 47(2), 6-32.Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (1999). Sources of industrial leadership: studies of seven industries. Cambridge University Press.Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press on Demand.Nelson, R. R. (1994). The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1), 47-63.OECD. (1992). Technology and the economy: The key relationships (Vol. 22). Organization for Economic.Penrose, E., & Penrose, E. T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford university press.Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of economic growth, 9(2), 131-165.Singletary, M. W. (1994). Mass communication research: Contemporary methods and applications. Longman.Soete, L. (1988). 2 1 Catching up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity.Stewart, D. W. (2000). 次級資料研究法 (黃. 董旭英, Trans.). 弘智文化.Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639-656.Vernon, R. (1992). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. In International economic policies and their theoretical foundations (pp. 415-435). Elsevier.Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Mass media research. Cengage learning.Winter, S. G., & Nelson, R. R. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign`s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation practice, 15(3), 283-290.Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
109364116資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109364116 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 柯玉佳 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Ko, Yu-Chia en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 劉誠翰 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Liu, Cheng-Han en_US dc.creator (作者) 劉誠翰 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Liu, Cheng-Han en_US dc.date (日期) 2023 en_US dc.date.accessioned 6-Jul-2023 16:23:09 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 6-Jul-2023 16:23:09 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 6-Jul-2023 16:23:09 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0109364116 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145745 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 109364116 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著近年全球綠能趨勢，西元2016年臺灣政府公布2025非核家園新能源政策，訂定離岸風電為核心發展項目。同時為了建立本土離岸風電供應鏈，工業局於西元2017年也揭示離岸風力發電產業政策，預期透過政策誘因將供應鏈落實於國內。然而，離岸風電技術對於臺灣廠商而言為全新的領域，如何克服技術落差並把握相關機會，提升技術能力至國際水平，對離岸風電本土供應鏈之發展至關重要。本研究採用技術追趕以及機會之窗理論探究台灣本土風電供應商於技術落差下之樣態，然而，過往技術追趕理論相關文獻大多僅辨識出產義後進者之技術追趕現況，而機會之窗等相關文獻也無提及後進者於技術追趕上之現況，雖然提供了堅實的研究基礎，卻缺乏了整合性的概念，因此為了彌補上述文獻之缺口，本研究得以發展出嶄新的研究框架，整合技術追趕以及機會之窗之學術概念，為產業後進者提供克服技術落差之框架，以期達到成功之技術追趕。本研究以離岸風電產業中之水下基礎技術為例，選定世紀離岸風電設備股份有限公司為個案研究對象，進行深度訪談及次級資料搜集，透過本研究提出之理論框架，為臺灣離岸風電產業後進者提供得以克服技術落差之機會分析，並為我國離岸風電供應鏈國產化政策提供修正方向與後續建言。本研究最後得出的主要結論如下：一、世紀風電目前於水下基礎生產之兩大產品線（管架式水下基礎、水下基樁），因共享世紀風電企業資源與產線設施，可定義為技術框架中之第二階段。二、世紀風電因與技術先行者成立合資公司，於技術追趕上所遇到的困難並不是先行者拒絕轉讓授權或技術，而是根本技術能力上的落差，包含專案及文件管理、從業人才缺乏、焊接技術落差以及遵循規範差異。三、世紀風電可以從既有技術落差切入，從技術、需求、制度面把握機會之窗，追趕上國際先行者之水準。四、世紀風電若能持續維持積極之技術追趕作為，有了政策的支持以及國內外長遠之需求驅動，得以快速累積技術能力，達成成功技術追趕之目標。本論文也於最後進一步闡述本研究之學術貢獻，並提出管理意涵以及研究方向建議供未來研究參考。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) With the global trend of green energy in recent years, the Taiwan government announced the 2025 non-nuclear homeland energy policy in 2016 and set offshore wind power as the core development project. At the same time, to establish a local offshore wind power supply chain, the Industrial Development Bureau also revealed the offshore wind power industry localization policy in 2017, expecting to implement the supply chain in Taiwan through policy incentives. However, offshore wind power technology is a brand new field for Taiwanese manufacturers. How to overcome the technological gap and seize the relevant opportunities to enhance the technological capability at the international level is crucial to the development of the local supply chain for offshore wind power.Nevertheless, most of the previous literature on technology catching-up theory only identifies the current status of technology catching-up of latecomers in the industrial sense, and literature on the window of opportunity does not mention the current status of latecomers in technology catching-up, which provides a solid basis for research but lacks an integrated concept. To fill the above-mentioned research gap, this study develops a new research framework that integrates the academic concepts of technology catching-up and window of opportunity to provide a framework for industry latecomers to overcome the technology gap in order to achieve a successful technology catching-up.This study selected the offshore wind underwater foundation of local manufacturer Century Wind Power Co., Ltd. as a case object for the in-depth research. Through semi-structured interviews and secondary data analysis to adapt the theoretical framework proposed in this study, we can provide an opportunity analysis for Taiwan`s offshore wind industry latecomers to overcome the technological gap and provide a revised direction and follow-up suggestions for the localization policy of Taiwan`s offshore wind supply chain. The conclusions of this study are as follows.1. The two major product lines of Century Wind Power Co., Ltd. current underwater foundation production ( Jacket foundation and Pinpile) can be defined as the second stage of the technical framework as they share the same resources and facilities.2. Since Century Wind Power Co., Ltd. has established a joint venture with a forerunner, the difficulty in catching up is not the refusal of the forerunner to transfer the license or technology, but the difference in fundamental technical capability, including project and document management, lack of personnel in the industry, challenging in welding technology, and difference in compliance with regulations.3. Century Wind Power Co., Ltd. can seize the window of opportunity in terms of technology, demand, and institutional to catch up with the international forerunner standard.4. With the policy support and long-term domestic and international demand, Century Wind Power Co., Ltd. can accumulate technical capability to achieve the goal of successful technology catch-up.At the end of this study, academic contributions, practical implications, and future research suggestions are future elaborated. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 摘要 IABSTRACT III目次 V表次 VII圖次 VIII第壹章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與研究動機 1第二節 研究目的及研究問題 5第三節 文獻理論與研究方法概述 7第貳章 文獻探討 9第一節 科技體制與技術能力 10第二節 技術追趕 12第三節 機會之窗 29第四節 本文文獻架構 36第五節 離岸風電供應鏈概況 38第六節 水下基礎項目技術介紹 42第參章 研究方法 47第一節 研究方法 48第二節 資料搜集工具 51第三節 研究個案選擇與訪談大綱 54第肆章 個案分析與討論 58第一節 個案公司資訊 59第二節 技術追趕現況分析 70第三節 機會之窗分析 85第四節 研究發現 101第伍章 結論與建議 105第一節 研究結論 106第二節 實務意涵 110第三節 理論意涵 112第四節 研究限制 113第五節 未來研究方向 114參考文獻 116 zh_TW dc.format.extent 6159135 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109364116 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 離岸風電產業 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 技術追趕 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 機會之窗 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 產業創新系統 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國產化政策 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Offshore wind power industry en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Technology catching-up en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Window of opportunity en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Sectoral system of innovation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Localization policy en_US dc.title (題名) 臺灣離岸風電產業之技術追趕 – 以水下基礎為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Technological catch-up of offshore wind power industry in Taiwan: The case of underwater foundation technology en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中央社. (2020). 打造離岸風電新絲路 鋼鐵業淘綠金. 工商時報. https://ctee.com.tw/news/industry/205846.html王政憲. (2021). 永續轉型歷程中創新類型與社會科技體制的互動與變遷─ 以丹麥能源轉型與風機產業為例.王昱翔. (2021a). 大缺工下，焊接還得重學？「離岸風電國產化」陷困境. 遠見雜誌. https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/83336王昱翔. (2021b, 2021/11/2). 自己的人才自己養！「離岸風電國產化」缺工自救：台廠開課、徵年輕人. 遠見雜誌. https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/83832吳心恩. (2021). 離岸風電焊工與歐規接軌 世紀鋼構總工程師 吳江富：熬過了就是你的本事. Wind Taiwan 離岸風電雜誌 第十期, 92-95.吳心恩、施美旭. (2021). 離岸風電國產化目標大邁進 100%國產化水下基礎產製完成. Wind Taiwan 離岸風電雜誌 第十期, 26-29.吳心恩、龔鈴津. (2021). 水下基礎的決勝點 焊接. Wind Taiwan 離岸風電雜誌 第十期, 83-93.林文靖. (2021). 離岸風電水下基礎鋼構製造與檢驗要求概述. https://www.cima.org.tw/expert/blog202107-13/林淑馨. (2010). 質性研究：理論與實務. 巨流圖書股份有限公司.林菁樺. (2022). 世紀鋼再擴台北廠 總投資上看200億元. 自由時報. https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/3974552施文玲. (2006). 質性取向研究理論派典之探析. 網路社會學通訊期刊, 52.施美旭、陳妍伶. (2021). 分享與交流 厚實產業技術基底 水下基礎製造技術交流研討會登場. Wind Taiwan 離岸風電雜誌 第十一期, 28 - 37.范麗娟. (1994). 深度訪談簡介. 戶外遊憩研究, 7(2), 25-35.曹國興、汪立德. (2019). 離岸風電水下基礎之焊接工程及人員技能需求. 就業安全, 29-37.許尚溥. (2021). 企業再生能源購售電合約全球概況與展望. 台灣經濟研究院研究一所.陳文姿. (2018). Google都想搶的台灣第一張PPA 專家解析：為何要直接跟業者買綠電. 環境資訊中心.陳文姿. (2019). 愛河上可以蓋風機嗎？ 你所不知的「浮動式風機」 讓專家來解答. https://e-info.org.tw/node/221418陳向明. (2002). 社會科學質的研究. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.陳映璇. (2019). 打造離岸風電30層樓高「水下基礎」，興達海基將組400人焊接部隊拚進度. 數位時代 BUSINESS NEXT. https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/54662/sdms-jacket-foundation-for-orsted-offshore-wind陳映璇. (2022). 世紀鋼奪21座台灣最大水下基礎訂單！賴文祥：離岸風電是數十年都做不完的生意. 數位時代. https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/68295/century--jacket彭柏鈞. (2021). 台灣離岸風電水下基礎在地產業鏈. Wind Taiwan 離岸風電雜誌 第十期, 49-55.黃金城、樊庭宇、朱棟樑. (2019). 離岸風機水下結構的設計─海上巨型風扇的支撐者. 科學發展.新聞傳播處, 行.-. (2016). 為邁向2025非核家園目標 推動新能源政策. 行政院. https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F759E41CCD91/c094fb4e-6c07-4a87-9435-fb97f11dde10經濟部研究發展委員會. (2022). 離岸風電水下基礎產業技術升級輔導計畫.葉志誠、葉立誠. (2011). 研究方法與寫作. 商鼎數位.鄭偉成、林曉琪. (2019). 離岸風力機的雙腳─水下基礎技術簡述鄭斐文. (2021). 綠能與離岸風電並進 完善政策推動台灣能源轉型. DIGITIMES. https://www.digitimes.com.tw/iot/article.asp?cat=130&cat1=40&cat2=140&id=0000624074_UZ7LLJQQ8RTR673M5S754Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American economic review, 91(5), 1369-1401.Amann, E., & Cantwell, J. (2012). Innovative firms in emerging market countries. Oxford University Press.Amsden, A. H. (1992). Asia`s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford University Press on Demand.Amsden, A. H., & Chu, W.-w. (2003). Beyond late development: Taiwan`s upgrading policies. Mit Press.Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between.Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent`s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of marketing, 64(3), 1-17.Christensen, C. M. (2013). The innovator`s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research.Ernst, D. (2002). Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems. Implications for developing countries. Economics of innovation and new technology, 11(6), 497-523.Ernst, D., & Kim, L. (2002). Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1417-1429.Fagerberg, J. (1988). International competitiveness. The economic journal, 98(391), 355-374.Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M., & Verspagen, B. (2010). The role of innovation in development. Review of economics and institutions, 1(2).Freeman, R., Freeman, C., & Freeman, S. (1987). Technology, policy, and economic performance: lessons from Japan. Burns & Oates.Giachetti, C., & Marchi, G. (2017). Successive changes in leadership in the worldwide mobile phone industry: The role of windows of opportunity and firms’ competitive action. Research Policy, 46(2), 352-364.Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative science quarterly, 9-30.Hobday, M. (1995). Innovation in East Asia. Books.Katz, J. (1995). Domestic technology generation in less developed countries: a review of research findings. IDB/ECLA Research Program in Science and Technology.Kim, L. (1980). Stages of development of industrial technology in a developing country: a model. Research Policy, 9(3), 254-277.Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea`s technological learning. In: Harvard Business School PressKim, L. (1998). Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization science, 9(4), 506-521.Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: an economic evaluation of the global competitiveness report. World development, 29(9), 1501-1525.Lee, K. (2005). Making a Technological Catch‐up: Barriers and opportunities. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13(2), 97-131.Lee, K. (2010). What makes more successful and less successful technological catch-up: analyzing the 10 late-comer countries. International Schumpeter Society Conference,Lee, K., & Lim, C. (2001). Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, 30(3), 459-483.Lee, K., & Malerba, F. (2017). Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy, 46(2), 338-351.Lee, K., Park, T. Y., & Krishnan, R. T. (2014). Catching‐up or leapfrogging in the Indian IT service sector: Windows of opportunity, Path‐creating, and moving up the value chain. Development Policy Review, 32(4), 495-518.Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning.Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247-264.Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation: concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge University Press.Mathews, J. A. (2001). National systems of economic learning: The case of technology diffusion management in East Asia.Mathews, J. A. (2002). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific journal of management, 19(4), 467-488.Mathews, J. A. (2003). Competitive dynamics and economic learning: an extended resource‐based view. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(1), 115-145.Mathews, J. A. (2005). Strategy and the crystal cycle. California Management Review, 47(2), 6-32.Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (1999). Sources of industrial leadership: studies of seven industries. Cambridge University Press.Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press on Demand.Nelson, R. R. (1994). The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1), 47-63.OECD. (1992). Technology and the economy: The key relationships (Vol. 22). Organization for Economic.Penrose, E., & Penrose, E. T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford university press.Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of economic growth, 9(2), 131-165.Singletary, M. W. (1994). Mass communication research: Contemporary methods and applications. Longman.Soete, L. (1988). 2 1 Catching up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity.Stewart, D. W. (2000). 次級資料研究法 (黃. 董旭英, Trans.). 弘智文化.Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639-656.Vernon, R. (1992). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. In International economic policies and their theoretical foundations (pp. 415-435). Elsevier.Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Mass media research. Cengage learning.Winter, S. G., & Nelson, R. R. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign`s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation practice, 15(3), 283-290.Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage. zh_TW
