學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 彌爾的政治與社會思想中之維續發展論
Sustained Progress in John Stuart Mill`s Social and Political Thought作者 簡智柔
Chien, Chih-Jou貢獻者 陳建綱
Chen, Chien-Kang
簡智柔
Chien, Chih-Jou關鍵詞 效益主義
約翰 史都華 彌爾
代議式民主
社會主義
資本主義
對立主義
Utilitarianism
John Stuart Mill
Representative democracy
Socialism
Capitalism
Antagonism日期 2023 上傳時間 6-Jul-2023 16:35:08 (UTC+8) 摘要 此論文研究約翰 史都華 彌爾之經濟、社會與政治思想中之效益主義，主張維續社會發展貫穿其思想。透過詳細分析自由與平等如何形塑彌爾提倡之體制理想，聚焦其去中心化社會主義市場經濟、競合性別關係與代議式政府。透過體制設計，個人性與親社會性之協作得以推進動態社會發展。
This thesis examines John Stuart Mill’s utilitarian ethics of social progress in the context of his economic, social and political thought. In contending that Mill was committed to the inculcation of individuality and sociability, the thesis offers a detailed analysis of how liberty and equality frame and qualify Mill’s institutional ideals, specifically his prescribed regimes of the decentralized socialist market economy, a gender relation founded on competitive partnership, and the representative government. It’s shown that a synergy among economic, social, and political development is instrumentalized to permanently serve the overall utility.參考文獻 References Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2005. The Ethics of Identity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Allen, Barbara. “The Puzzle of Gender in Liberal Theory: Tocqueville and Mill on Women and the Family.” Digital Library of the Commons. Indiana University, 1995. https://hdl.handle.net/10535/4115. Annas, Julia. 1977. “Mill and the Subjection of Women.” Philosophy, 52(200), 179-194. Anthony, Kanu Ikechukwu. 2012. “The Equality of Sexes in J.S. Mill Vis-A-Vis the Participation of Women in the Nigerian Labour and Economy.” Afrrev Laligens, 1(1), 18-29. Barker, Chris. 2015. “JS Mill on Nineteenth Century Marriage and the Common Law.” Law, Culture, and the Humanities. 15(1), 106-126. Berlin, Isiah. 1960. John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life. London: Council of Christians and Jews. Brilhante, A. Amaral. “The Centrality of Accountability in John Stuart Mill’s Liberal-Utilitarian Conception of Democracy.” PhD diss., University of London, 2007, https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1444009. Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert. 1986. Democracy and Capitalism, Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought. New York: Basic Books. Dalaqua, Hessmann Gustavo. 2018. “John Stuart Mill’s Republican Feminism.” Kalagatos, 15(2), 14-33. Gairdner, William. 2008. “Poetry and the mystique of the self in John Stuart Mill: sources of libertarian socialism.” Humanitas, 21(1/2), 1-9. Gaus, Gerald. “Mill`s Normative Economics.” In The Companion to Mill, ed. Macleod Christopher and Miller E. Dale (West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017), 488-503. Gray, John and Smith, G.W. 2013. Mill on Liberty in Focus. London: Routledge. Groenewegen, D. Peter. 2005. “Was John Stuart Mill A Classical Economist?” History of Economic Ideas, 13(3), 9-31. Hamburger, Joseph. 2001. John Stuart Mill on Liberty and Control. Chichester: Princeton University Press. Halliday, R. J. 1976. Political Thinkers. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. Hansson, O. Sven. 2022. “John Stuart Mill and the Conflicts of Equality.” The Journal of Ethics, 26, 433-453. Hirschmann, J. Nancy. 2008. “Mill, Political Economy and Women’s Work.” American Political Science Review 102(2), 199-213. Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan. New York: Dover. Hughes, Patricia. 1979. “The Reality versus the Ideal: J. S. Mill`s Treatment of Women, Workers, and Private Property.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 12(3), 523-542. Jahn, Beate. 2005. “Barbarian Thoughts: Imperialism in the Philosophy of John Stuart Mill.” Review of International Studies, 31(3), 599-618. Kinzer, L. Bruce. 1978. “J. S. Mill and the Secret Ballot.” Historical Reflections, 5 (1), 19-39. Kors, Alan Charles. 2011. “The Paradox of John Stuart Mill.” Social Philosophy and Policy, 28(2), 1-18. Krall, E. Lorraine. 2012. Freeing Women: Tocqueville, Mill, and Arendt on Women’s Role. Phd dissertation, Georgetown University. Kundakci, Deniz. 2018. “Right to Universal, Plural and Secret Vote: On the Liberal and Conservative Paradoxes of Mill`s `Elitist` Democracy.” Beytulhikme Philosophy Circle, 8(2), 593-617. Kwame Anthony Appiah. 2007. The Ethics of Identity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Lamberti, Jean-Claude. 1989. Tocqueville and the Two Democracies. Washington: Harvard University Press. McCabe, Helen. 2015. “John Stuart Mill, Utility and the Family : attacking the `citadel of the enemy’." Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 272 (2). 225-235. Macleod Christopher and Miller E. Dale, eds. 2017. A Companion to Mill. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. Mann, Hollie and Spinner-Halev Jeff. 2010. “John Stuart Mill`s Feminism: On Progress, the State, and the Path to Justice.” Polity, 42(2), 244-270. Mousourakis, George. 2013. “Human Fallibilism and Individual Self-Development in John Stuart Mill’s Theory of Liberty.” Ethics & Politics, 15, 386-396. Morales, H. Maria. Donner,Wendy, Burgess-Jackson, Keith and Annas Julia. 2005. Mill’s the Subjection of Women. United States: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Murdoch, Iris. 1993. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. London: Penguin Books. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. J.M. Robson (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963-1991), 33 vols. Volume titles as listed: Volume I - Autobiography and Literary Essays Volume II - The Principles of Political Economy I Volume III - Principles of Political Economy Part II Volume IV - Essays on Economics and Society Part I Volume V - Essays on Economics and Society Part II Volume VI - Essays on England, Ireland, and the Empire Volume VII - A System of Logic Part I Volume VIII - A System of Logic Part II Volume IX - William Hamilton’s Philosophy Volume X - Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society Volume XI - Essays on Philosophy and the Classics Volume XII - The Earlier Letters 1812-1848 Part I Volume XIII - The Earlier Letters 1812-1848 Part II Volume XIV - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part I Volume XV - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part II Volume XVI - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part III Volume XVII - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part IV Volume XVIII - Essays on Politics and Society Part I Murdoch, Iris. 2003. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. London: Vintage. Lipson, Leslie. 1964. The Democratic Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press. Eunseong, Oh. 2016. “Mill on Paternalism.” Journal of Political Inquiry, 47, 1-9. Okin, Susan Moller. 1973. ”John Stuart Mill’s Feminism: The Subjection of Women and the Improvement of Mankind." New Zealand Journal of History, 7(2), 105-127. Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books. Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire : The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Plamenatz, John.1949. The English Utilitarians. Oxford: Blackwell. Riley, Jonathan. “Mill’s Neo-Athenian Model of Liberal Democracy.” In J. S. Mill`s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, ed. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 221-249. Ryan, Alan. 2012. The Making of Modern Liberalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Saunders, Ben. 2016. “Reformulating Mill’s Harm Principle.” Mind, 125(500), 1005-1032. Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 1981. “Marital Slavery and Friendship: John Stuart Mill’s the Subjection of Women.” Political Theory, 9(2), 229-247. Sigot, Nathalie and Beaurain, Christophe. 2021. “John Stuart Mill and the Employment of Married Women: Reconciling Utility and Justice.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 31(3), 1-43. Skorupski, John, eds. 1998. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Smart, Paul. 1990. “‘Some Will be More Equal than Others’: J. S. Mill on Democracy, Freedom and Meritocracy.” Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 76(3), 308-323. Spitz, Elaine. 1982. “On Shanley, ‘Marital Slavery and Friendship.’” Political Theory, 10(3), 461-464. Taylor, Charles and Gutmann, Amy. 1994. Multiculturalism : Examining the Politics of Recognition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Ten, C. L. “Democracy, Socialism, and the Working Classes.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, ed. Skorupski, John (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 372-395. Thompson, F. Dennis. “Mill in Parliament : When Should a Philosopher Compromise?” In J. S. Mill`s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. ed. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 166-199. Thompson, F. Dennis. 1976. John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Tunick, Mark. 2006. “Tolerant Imperialism: John Stuart Mill’s Defense of British Rule in India.” The Review of Politics, 68(4), 586–611. Turner, P. Brandon. 2010. “John Stuart Mill and the Antagonistic Foundation of Liberal Politics.” The Review of Politics, 72(1), 25-53. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, eds. 2007. J. S. Mill`s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Warner, E. Beth. 2001. “John Stuart Mill’s Theory of Bureaucracy Within Representative Government: Balancing Competence and Participation.” Public Administration Review, 61(4), 403-413. Zakaras, Alex. “John Stuart Mill, Individuality, and Participatory Democracy.” In J. S. Mill`s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. ed. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 200-220. Zouboulakis, S. Michel. 2002. “John Stuart Mill’s Institutional Individualism.” History of Economic Ideas, 10(3), 29-45. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
109862003資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109862003 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳建綱 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Chien-Kang en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 簡智柔 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chien, Chih-Jou en_US dc.creator (作者) 簡智柔 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chien, Chih-Jou en_US dc.date (日期) 2023 en_US dc.date.accessioned 6-Jul-2023 16:35:08 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 6-Jul-2023 16:35:08 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 6-Jul-2023 16:35:08 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0109862003 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145810 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 109862003 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 此論文研究約翰 史都華 彌爾之經濟、社會與政治思想中之效益主義，主張維續社會發展貫穿其思想。透過詳細分析自由與平等如何形塑彌爾提倡之體制理想，聚焦其去中心化社會主義市場經濟、競合性別關係與代議式政府。透過體制設計，個人性與親社會性之協作得以推進動態社會發展。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This thesis examines John Stuart Mill’s utilitarian ethics of social progress in the context of his economic, social and political thought. In contending that Mill was committed to the inculcation of individuality and sociability, the thesis offers a detailed analysis of how liberty and equality frame and qualify Mill’s institutional ideals, specifically his prescribed regimes of the decentralized socialist market economy, a gender relation founded on competitive partnership, and the representative government. It’s shown that a synergy among economic, social, and political development is instrumentalized to permanently serve the overall utility. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Table of Contents Chapter 1: A Comprehensive Check Against Regression 1 1.1. Introduction 1 1.2. Literature Review 3 1.3. Mill on Human Development and Social Progress 11 Chapter 2: Classical Economy with a Modern Vision 20 2.1. The Invisible Hand of Economic Liberty 20 2.2. The Ultimate Point of Progress 24 2.3. The Best of the Two Systems 30 2.4. Collective Ownership & Market-Embedded Cooperation 37 Chapter 3: Nipping it at the Familial Bud 45 3.1. Female Enslavement by Laws and Norms 45 3.2. The Economic Value of Women’s Work 51 3.3. More Than Women’s Utility 58 3.4. Family and Social Progress 65 Chapter 4: Equal Representation Enabled by Civic Enlightenment 69 4.1. Mill’s Representative Democracy and Public Participation 69 4.2. The Dangers of Representative Government and Antagonism 81 4.3. Separation of Power and Proportional Representation 92 4.4. Plural Vote and Anti-Elitism 96 Chapter 5: Conclusion 103 References 112 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109862003 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 效益主義 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 約翰 史都華 彌爾 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 代議式民主 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會主義 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資本主義 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 對立主義 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Utilitarianism en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) John Stuart Mill en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Representative democracy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Socialism en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Capitalism en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Antagonism en_US dc.title (題名) 彌爾的政治與社會思想中之維續發展論 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Sustained Progress in John Stuart Mill`s Social and Political Thought en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) References Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2005. The Ethics of Identity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Allen, Barbara. “The Puzzle of Gender in Liberal Theory: Tocqueville and Mill on Women and the Family.” Digital Library of the Commons. Indiana University, 1995. https://hdl.handle.net/10535/4115. Annas, Julia. 1977. “Mill and the Subjection of Women.” Philosophy, 52(200), 179-194. Anthony, Kanu Ikechukwu. 2012. “The Equality of Sexes in J.S. Mill Vis-A-Vis the Participation of Women in the Nigerian Labour and Economy.” Afrrev Laligens, 1(1), 18-29. Barker, Chris. 2015. “JS Mill on Nineteenth Century Marriage and the Common Law.” Law, Culture, and the Humanities. 15(1), 106-126. Berlin, Isiah. 1960. John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life. London: Council of Christians and Jews. Brilhante, A. Amaral. “The Centrality of Accountability in John Stuart Mill’s Liberal-Utilitarian Conception of Democracy.” PhD diss., University of London, 2007, https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1444009. Bowles, Samuel and Gintis, Herbert. 1986. Democracy and Capitalism, Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought. New York: Basic Books. Dalaqua, Hessmann Gustavo. 2018. “John Stuart Mill’s Republican Feminism.” Kalagatos, 15(2), 14-33. Gairdner, William. 2008. “Poetry and the mystique of the self in John Stuart Mill: sources of libertarian socialism.” Humanitas, 21(1/2), 1-9. Gaus, Gerald. “Mill`s Normative Economics.” In The Companion to Mill, ed. Macleod Christopher and Miller E. Dale (West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017), 488-503. Gray, John and Smith, G.W. 2013. Mill on Liberty in Focus. London: Routledge. Groenewegen, D. Peter. 2005. “Was John Stuart Mill A Classical Economist?” History of Economic Ideas, 13(3), 9-31. Hamburger, Joseph. 2001. John Stuart Mill on Liberty and Control. Chichester: Princeton University Press. Halliday, R. J. 1976. Political Thinkers. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. Hansson, O. Sven. 2022. “John Stuart Mill and the Conflicts of Equality.” The Journal of Ethics, 26, 433-453. Hirschmann, J. Nancy. 2008. “Mill, Political Economy and Women’s Work.” American Political Science Review 102(2), 199-213. Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. Leviathan. New York: Dover. Hughes, Patricia. 1979. “The Reality versus the Ideal: J. S. Mill`s Treatment of Women, Workers, and Private Property.” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 12(3), 523-542. Jahn, Beate. 2005. “Barbarian Thoughts: Imperialism in the Philosophy of John Stuart Mill.” Review of International Studies, 31(3), 599-618. Kinzer, L. Bruce. 1978. “J. S. Mill and the Secret Ballot.” Historical Reflections, 5 (1), 19-39. Kors, Alan Charles. 2011. “The Paradox of John Stuart Mill.” Social Philosophy and Policy, 28(2), 1-18. Krall, E. Lorraine. 2012. Freeing Women: Tocqueville, Mill, and Arendt on Women’s Role. Phd dissertation, Georgetown University. Kundakci, Deniz. 2018. “Right to Universal, Plural and Secret Vote: On the Liberal and Conservative Paradoxes of Mill`s `Elitist` Democracy.” Beytulhikme Philosophy Circle, 8(2), 593-617. Kwame Anthony Appiah. 2007. The Ethics of Identity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Lamberti, Jean-Claude. 1989. Tocqueville and the Two Democracies. Washington: Harvard University Press. McCabe, Helen. 2015. “John Stuart Mill, Utility and the Family : attacking the `citadel of the enemy’." Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 272 (2). 225-235. Macleod Christopher and Miller E. Dale, eds. 2017. A Companion to Mill. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. Mann, Hollie and Spinner-Halev Jeff. 2010. “John Stuart Mill`s Feminism: On Progress, the State, and the Path to Justice.” Polity, 42(2), 244-270. Mousourakis, George. 2013. “Human Fallibilism and Individual Self-Development in John Stuart Mill’s Theory of Liberty.” Ethics & Politics, 15, 386-396. Morales, H. Maria. Donner,Wendy, Burgess-Jackson, Keith and Annas Julia. 2005. Mill’s the Subjection of Women. United States: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Murdoch, Iris. 1993. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. London: Penguin Books. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. J.M. Robson (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963-1991), 33 vols. Volume titles as listed: Volume I - Autobiography and Literary Essays Volume II - The Principles of Political Economy I Volume III - Principles of Political Economy Part II Volume IV - Essays on Economics and Society Part I Volume V - Essays on Economics and Society Part II Volume VI - Essays on England, Ireland, and the Empire Volume VII - A System of Logic Part I Volume VIII - A System of Logic Part II Volume IX - William Hamilton’s Philosophy Volume X - Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society Volume XI - Essays on Philosophy and the Classics Volume XII - The Earlier Letters 1812-1848 Part I Volume XIII - The Earlier Letters 1812-1848 Part II Volume XIV - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part I Volume XV - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part II Volume XVI - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part III Volume XVII - The Later Letters 1849-1873 Part IV Volume XVIII - Essays on Politics and Society Part I Murdoch, Iris. 2003. Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals. London: Vintage. Lipson, Leslie. 1964. The Democratic Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press. Eunseong, Oh. 2016. “Mill on Paternalism.” Journal of Political Inquiry, 47, 1-9. Okin, Susan Moller. 1973. ”John Stuart Mill’s Feminism: The Subjection of Women and the Improvement of Mankind." New Zealand Journal of History, 7(2), 105-127. Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books. Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire : The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Plamenatz, John.1949. The English Utilitarians. Oxford: Blackwell. Riley, Jonathan. “Mill’s Neo-Athenian Model of Liberal Democracy.” In J. S. Mill`s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, ed. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 221-249. Ryan, Alan. 2012. The Making of Modern Liberalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Saunders, Ben. 2016. “Reformulating Mill’s Harm Principle.” Mind, 125(500), 1005-1032. Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 1981. “Marital Slavery and Friendship: John Stuart Mill’s the Subjection of Women.” Political Theory, 9(2), 229-247. Sigot, Nathalie and Beaurain, Christophe. 2021. “John Stuart Mill and the Employment of Married Women: Reconciling Utility and Justice.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 31(3), 1-43. Skorupski, John, eds. 1998. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Smart, Paul. 1990. “‘Some Will be More Equal than Others’: J. S. Mill on Democracy, Freedom and Meritocracy.” Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 76(3), 308-323. Spitz, Elaine. 1982. “On Shanley, ‘Marital Slavery and Friendship.’” Political Theory, 10(3), 461-464. Taylor, Charles and Gutmann, Amy. 1994. Multiculturalism : Examining the Politics of Recognition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Ten, C. L. “Democracy, Socialism, and the Working Classes.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, ed. Skorupski, John (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 372-395. Thompson, F. Dennis. “Mill in Parliament : When Should a Philosopher Compromise?” In J. S. Mill`s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. ed. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 166-199. Thompson, F. Dennis. 1976. John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Tunick, Mark. 2006. “Tolerant Imperialism: John Stuart Mill’s Defense of British Rule in India.” The Review of Politics, 68(4), 586–611. Turner, P. Brandon. 2010. “John Stuart Mill and the Antagonistic Foundation of Liberal Politics.” The Review of Politics, 72(1), 25-53. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, eds. 2007. J. S. Mill`s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Warner, E. Beth. 2001. “John Stuart Mill’s Theory of Bureaucracy Within Representative Government: Balancing Competence and Participation.” Public Administration Review, 61(4), 403-413. Zakaras, Alex. “John Stuart Mill, Individuality, and Participatory Democracy.” In J. S. Mill`s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. ed. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 200-220. Zouboulakis, S. Michel. 2002. “John Stuart Mill’s Institutional Individualism.” History of Economic Ideas, 10(3), 29-45. zh_TW
