1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 兒少與家庭關懷服務之家庭暴力防治效果－以安康平價住宅為例
Youth and family services for domestic violence prevention: A case study of An-Kang low-cost housing
作者 簡伶禎
Chien, Ling-Chen
貢獻者 蘇昱璇
簡伶禎
Chien, Ling-Chen
關鍵詞 平價住宅
家庭暴力
兒少虐待
大學社會責任計畫
Low-cost housing
University Social Responsibility
Domestic violence
Child abuse
日期 2023
上傳時間 2-Aug-2023 13:46:20 (UTC+8)
摘要 臺北市平價住宅為臺北市政府於1980年代所興建，其中安康平宅戶數聚落最大，社區中長期存在貧窮、弱勢集中等議題，當鄰里環境因素與家內弱勢因素匯聚時，易形成家庭暴力的高風險家庭。本研究利用臺北市家庭暴力暨性侵害防治中心所建置的家暴地圖資料庫，檢視安康平宅所在之文山區明義里自2016年至2021年之家庭暴力數量與類型，並透過差異中之差異法、合成控制法及合成差異中之差異法，發現國立政治大學「興隆安康‧共好文山」大學社會責任計畫之兒少與家庭關懷相關方案介入後，明義里兒少保護案件數量及盛行率均顯著下降。
Low-cost housing in Taipei City was constructed by the Taipei City Government in the 1980s. Among them, An-Kang low-cost housing is the largest settlement, where issues such as poverty and the concentration of vulnerable populations have long existed. When neighborhood environmental factors combine with domestic vulnerabilities, it can create a high-risk environment for domestic violence within families. In this paper, we utilized the domestic violence mapping database established by the Taipei Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Prevention Center to examine the quantity and types of domestic violence cases in Mingyi Village, Wenshan District, where An-Kang low-cost housing is located, from 2016 to 2021. By employing the Difference-in-Differences, Synthetic Control Method, and Synthetic Difference-in-Differences approaches, we found a significant decrease in the number and prevalence rate of child protection cases in Mingyi Village after the implementation of youth and family services related to the Prospering Ankang-Benefiting Wenshan Project at National Chengchi University.
參考文獻 Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review, 93(1), 113-132.
Aizer, A. (2010). The gender wage gap and domestic violence. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1847-1859.
Aizer, A., & Dal Bo, P. (2009). Love, hate and murder: Commitment devices in violent relationships. Journal of Public Economics, 93(3-4), 412-428.
Altafim, E. R. P., Pedro, M. E. A., & Linhares, M. B. M. (2016). Effectiveness of ACT raising safe kids parenting program in a developing country. Children and youth services review, 70, 315-323.
Arkhangelsky, D., Athey, S., Hirshberg, D. A., Imbens, G. W., & Wager, S. (2021). Synthetic difference-in-differences. American Economic Review, 111(12), 4088-4118.Bobonis, G. J., González-Brenes, M., & Castro, R. (2013). Public transfers and domestic violence: The roles of private information and spousal control. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(1), 179-205.
Bodenmann, G., Cina, A., Ledermann, T., & Sanders, M. R. (2008). The efficacy of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program in improving parenting and child behavior: a comparison with two other treatment conditions. Behaviour research and therapy, 46(4), 411-427.
Card, D., & Dahl, G. B. (2011). Family violence and football: The effect of unexpected emotional cues on violent behavior. The quarterly journal of economics, 126(1), 103-143.
Carter, W. H., Schill, M. H., & Wachter, S. M. (1998). Polarisation, public housing and racial minorities in US cities. Urban Studies, 35(10), 1889-1911.
Chapman, D. P., Whitfield, C. L., Felitti, V. J., Dube, S. R., Edwards, V. J., & Anda, R. F. (2004). Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of depressive disorders in adulthood. Journal of affective disorders, 82(2), 217-225.
Chin, Y.-M. (2012). Male backlash, bargaining, or exposure reduction?: women’s working status and physical spousal violence in India. Journal of Population Economics, 25(1), 175-200.
Cullen, F. T., Agnew, R., & Wilcox, P. (2014). Criminological theory: Past to present: Essential readings: Oxford University Press.
Daro, D., & Dodge, K. A. (2009). Creating community responsibility for child protection: Possibilities and challenges. Future Child, 19(2), 67-93.
Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American psychologist, 54(9), 755.
DuBois, D. L., & Keller, T. E. (2017). Investigation of the integration of supports for youth thriving into a community‐based mentoring program. Child Development, 88(5), 1480-1491.
Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (2003). Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate‐partner homicide. Law & society review, 37(1), 169-198.
Dzulkipli, A. A., Black, N., Johnston, D., & Segal, L. (2022). Compulsory schooling and health outcomes of maltreated children. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/at62c
Farrell, C. A., Fleegler, E. W., Monuteaux, M. C., Wilson, C. R., Christian, C. W., & Lee, L. K. (2017). Community poverty and child abuse fatalities in the United States. Pediatrics, 139(5).
Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22(3), 403-426.
Guarnieri, E., & Rainer, H. (2018). Female empowerment and male backlash. CESifo Working Paper Series 7009, CESifo Group Munich.
Heath, R. (2014). Women’s access to labor market opportunities, control of household resources, and domestic violence: Evidence from Bangladesh. World Development, 57, 32-46.
Henke, A., & Hsu, L. (2022). Covid-19 and domestic violence: Economics or isolation? Journal of family and economic issues, 1-14.
Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M. R., & Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization: Ballinger Cambridge, MA.
Howe, D. (2005). Child abuse and neglect: Attachment, development and intervention: Red Globe Press.
Hsu, L.-C., & Henke, A. (2021). COVID-19, staying at home, and domestic violence. Review of Economics of the Household, 19(1), 145-155.
Leung, C., Sanders, M. R., Leung, S., Mak, R., & Lau, J. (2003). An outcome evaluation of the implementation of the triple P‐Positive Parenting Program in Hong Kong. Family process, 42(4), 531-544.
Litwin, A., Perova, E., & Reynolds, S. A. (2019). A conditional cash transfer and Women`s empowerment: Does Bolsa Familia Influence intimate partner violence? Social Science & Medicine, 238, 112462.
Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining analysis. International economic review, 31-44.
McCord, J. (1978). A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects. American psychologist, 33(3), 284.
McDonell, J. R., Ben-Arieh, A., & Melton, G. B. (2015). Strong Communities for Children: Results of a multi-year community-based initiative to protect children from harm. Child Abuse & Neglect, 41, 79-96.
Mookerjee, M., Ojha, M., & Roy, S. (2022). Who’s your neighbour? Social influences on domestic violence. The Journal of Development Studies, 58(2), 350-369.
Portwood, S. G., Lambert, R. G., Abrams, L. P., & Nelson, E. B. (2011). An evaluation of the adults and children together (ACT) against violence parents raising safe kids program. The journal of primary prevention, 32(3), 147-160.
Ridley, M., Rao, G., Schilbach, F., & Patel, V. (2020). Poverty, depression, and anxiety: Causal evidence and mechanisms. science, 370(6522), eaay0214.
Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American journal of sociology, 94(4), 774-802.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918-924.
Sandler, D. H. (2017). Externalities of public housing: The effect of public housing demolitions on local crime. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 62, 24-35.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: University of Chicago Press.
Walker, L. E. (1989). Psychology and violence against women. American psychologist, 44(4), 695.
Walker, L. E. (2016). The battered woman syndrome: Springer publishing company New York.
李自強（2013）。家庭暴力的代間傳遞：一位觸法少年的個案分享。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，9（2），頁121-136。
沈瓊桃（2010）。暴力的童年，堅韌的青年：目睹婚暴暨受虐青年復原力之探討。中華輔導與諮商學報（27），頁115-160。
沈瓊桃（2018）。處罰父母，拯救小孩？臺灣強制性親職教育輔導的結果評估：以兒虐再通報率為指標。社會政策與社會工作學刊，22（1），頁97-133。
沈瓊桃、童伊迪（2018）。婚暴併兒虐家庭之多元模式與發生情境。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，14（2），頁73-104。
阮菲（2019）。多元時代的挑戰—安康平宅社區家長參與ACT親職教育方案之經驗。國立政治大學輔導與諮商碩士學位學程論文，臺北市。
林明禛（2019）。探討重複開案受虐兒童家庭特質及社工處遇。東吳社會工作學報（36），頁33-56。
林長杰（2000）。窮人的烙印：以台北市安康平宅為例。國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文，臺北市。
林雅容、林東龍、陳杏容、歐紫彤、潘淑滿（2016）。親密關係暴力：臺灣女性之受暴與求助經驗。臺灣社會工作學刊
林萬億（2003）。論我國的社會住宅政策與（17），頁13-41。社會照顧的結合。國家政策季刊，2（4），頁 53-82。
夏鑄九（1991）。臺北市平價住宅改建先期規劃案。臺北市：臺北市政府社會局。
師豫玲、孫淑文、陳肯玉（2008）。臺北市平價住宅問題探討，因應策略與未來發展方向。社區發展季刊（121），頁100-119。
陳杏容（2022）。兒少經歷家庭經濟困境者於成年初顯期的復原力經驗探究。東吳社會工作學報（42），頁93-122。
陳杏容、陳易甫（2019）。早期家庭經濟劣勢與成年初顯期發展成果之潛在剖析分析與其影響因子。中華心理衛生學刊，32（1），頁89-117。
傅如馨（2017）。含攝文化的兒少虐待預防與親職教育：以美國ACT Raising Safe Kids親職教育方案的文化調適為例。本土諮商心理學學刊，9（3），頁1-24。
彭淑華（2008）。兒虐致死危險因子與防治策略之研究。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集（11），頁231-266。
曾許達（2010）。平宅青少年的生活經驗—一個以青少年為主體陳述的探討。國立臺北大學社會工作學系碩士論文，臺北市。
游士嫺（2010）。罪惡不能侵擾之蒂－臺灣低犯罪率鄉鎮市區影響因素之研究。國立臺北大學犯罪學研究所碩士論文，臺北市。
游美貴（2015）。家庭暴力防治：社工對被害人服務實務。臺北市：洪葉文化。
黃心怡、楊愉安、溫筱雯、林良穗、沈瓊桃（2016）。都是權控惹的禍？多元化親密伴侶暴力型態之服務挑戰─以大台北地區聲請保護令案件為例。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，12（2），頁85-112。
黃筠媛（2014）。陪伴工作對平宅青少年的意義。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士倫文，臺北市。
黃翠紋、林淑君（2014）。不同類型家庭暴力事件成因及特性之研究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，10（2），頁91-129。
廖硃岑、周瑛梅、吳柏叡（2017）。台北市出租型公共住宅政策之研究。高大人文學報（2），頁63-95。
劉淑瓊（2021)）。系統除錯？個人咎責？台灣重大兒虐事件檢討機制之探究。臺灣社會工作學刊（44），頁1-44。
潘文欣（2021）。ACT Raising Safe Kids 親職教育方案應用於多元需求家庭之經驗探究。國立政治大學輔導與諮商碩士學位學程論文，臺北市。
潘淑滿（2021）。顧家難顧己：多重關係脈絡下的親密伴侶暴力。東吳社會工作學報（40），頁1-33。
鄭瑞隆（2007）。兒童虐待與少年偏差：問題與防治。臺北市：心理出版社。
藍佩嘉（2019）。拚教養：全球化、親職焦慮與不平等童年。臺北市：春山出版。
龔家琳、趙善如（2016)）。少年受虐事件的揭露：從兒童虐待走到少年虐待。臺灣社會工作學刊（33），頁1-41。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國家發展研究所
109261020
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109261020
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蘇昱璇zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 簡伶禎zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chien, Ling-Chenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 簡伶禎zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chien, Ling-Chenen_US
dc.date (日期) 2023en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-Aug-2023 13:46:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-Aug-2023 13:46:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Aug-2023 13:46:20 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0109261020en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146499-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國家發展研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 109261020zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 臺北市平價住宅為臺北市政府於1980年代所興建，其中安康平宅戶數聚落最大，社區中長期存在貧窮、弱勢集中等議題，當鄰里環境因素與家內弱勢因素匯聚時，易形成家庭暴力的高風險家庭。本研究利用臺北市家庭暴力暨性侵害防治中心所建置的家暴地圖資料庫，檢視安康平宅所在之文山區明義里自2016年至2021年之家庭暴力數量與類型，並透過差異中之差異法、合成控制法及合成差異中之差異法，發現國立政治大學「興隆安康‧共好文山」大學社會責任計畫之兒少與家庭關懷相關方案介入後，明義里兒少保護案件數量及盛行率均顯著下降。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Low-cost housing in Taipei City was constructed by the Taipei City Government in the 1980s. Among them, An-Kang low-cost housing is the largest settlement, where issues such as poverty and the concentration of vulnerable populations have long existed. When neighborhood environmental factors combine with domestic vulnerabilities, it can create a high-risk environment for domestic violence within families. In this paper, we utilized the domestic violence mapping database established by the Taipei Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Prevention Center to examine the quantity and types of domestic violence cases in Mingyi Village, Wenshan District, where An-Kang low-cost housing is located, from 2016 to 2021. By employing the Difference-in-Differences, Synthetic Control Method, and Synthetic Difference-in-Differences approaches, we found a significant decrease in the number and prevalence rate of child protection cases in Mingyi Village after the implementation of youth and family services related to the Prospering Ankang-Benefiting Wenshan Project at National Chengchi University.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究問題與目的 9
第二章、文獻探討 10
第一節、平價住宅 10
第二節、家庭暴力 12
第三節、小結 19
第三章、研究方法 23
第一節、資料來源與分析 23
第二節、研究模型 45
第四章、研究結果 49
第一節、差異中之差異法 49
第二節、合成控制法 61
第三節、合成差異中之差異法 65
第四節、穩健性檢驗 68
第五章、結論 78
第一節、研究結論 78
第二節、研究限制與未來研究建議 79
參考文獻 82		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 4345837 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109261020en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 平價住宅zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 家庭暴力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 兒少虐待zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 大學社會責任計畫zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Low-cost housingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) University Social Responsibilityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Domestic violenceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Child abuseen_US
dc.title (題名) 兒少與家庭關懷服務之家庭暴力防治效果－以安康平價住宅為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Youth and family services for domestic violence prevention: A case study of An-Kang low-cost housingen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review, 93(1), 113-132.
Aizer, A. (2010). The gender wage gap and domestic violence. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1847-1859.
Aizer, A., & Dal Bo, P. (2009). Love, hate and murder: Commitment devices in violent relationships. Journal of Public Economics, 93(3-4), 412-428.
Altafim, E. R. P., Pedro, M. E. A., & Linhares, M. B. M. (2016). Effectiveness of ACT raising safe kids parenting program in a developing country. Children and youth services review, 70, 315-323.
Arkhangelsky, D., Athey, S., Hirshberg, D. A., Imbens, G. W., & Wager, S. (2021). Synthetic difference-in-differences. American Economic Review, 111(12), 4088-4118.Bobonis, G. J., González-Brenes, M., & Castro, R. (2013). Public transfers and domestic violence: The roles of private information and spousal control. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(1), 179-205.
Bodenmann, G., Cina, A., Ledermann, T., & Sanders, M. R. (2008). The efficacy of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program in improving parenting and child behavior: a comparison with two other treatment conditions. Behaviour research and therapy, 46(4), 411-427.
Card, D., & Dahl, G. B. (2011). Family violence and football: The effect of unexpected emotional cues on violent behavior. The quarterly journal of economics, 126(1), 103-143.
Carter, W. H., Schill, M. H., & Wachter, S. M. (1998). Polarisation, public housing and racial minorities in US cities. Urban Studies, 35(10), 1889-1911.
Chapman, D. P., Whitfield, C. L., Felitti, V. J., Dube, S. R., Edwards, V. J., & Anda, R. F. (2004). Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of depressive disorders in adulthood. Journal of affective disorders, 82(2), 217-225.
Chin, Y.-M. (2012). Male backlash, bargaining, or exposure reduction?: women’s working status and physical spousal violence in India. Journal of Population Economics, 25(1), 175-200.
Cullen, F. T., Agnew, R., & Wilcox, P. (2014). Criminological theory: Past to present: Essential readings: Oxford University Press.
Daro, D., & Dodge, K. A. (2009). Creating community responsibility for child protection: Possibilities and challenges. Future Child, 19(2), 67-93.
Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American psychologist, 54(9), 755.
DuBois, D. L., & Keller, T. E. (2017). Investigation of the integration of supports for youth thriving into a community‐based mentoring program. Child Development, 88(5), 1480-1491.
Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (2003). Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate‐partner homicide. Law & society review, 37(1), 169-198.
Dzulkipli, A. A., Black, N., Johnston, D., & Segal, L. (2022). Compulsory schooling and health outcomes of maltreated children. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/at62c
Farrell, C. A., Fleegler, E. W., Monuteaux, M. C., Wilson, C. R., Christian, C. W., & Lee, L. K. (2017). Community poverty and child abuse fatalities in the United States. Pediatrics, 139(5).
Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22(3), 403-426.
Guarnieri, E., & Rainer, H. (2018). Female empowerment and male backlash. CESifo Working Paper Series 7009, CESifo Group Munich.
Heath, R. (2014). Women’s access to labor market opportunities, control of household resources, and domestic violence: Evidence from Bangladesh. World Development, 57, 32-46.
Henke, A., & Hsu, L. (2022). Covid-19 and domestic violence: Economics or isolation? Journal of family and economic issues, 1-14.
Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M. R., & Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization: Ballinger Cambridge, MA.
Howe, D. (2005). Child abuse and neglect: Attachment, development and intervention: Red Globe Press.
Hsu, L.-C., & Henke, A. (2021). COVID-19, staying at home, and domestic violence. Review of Economics of the Household, 19(1), 145-155.
Leung, C., Sanders, M. R., Leung, S., Mak, R., & Lau, J. (2003). An outcome evaluation of the implementation of the triple P‐Positive Parenting Program in Hong Kong. Family process, 42(4), 531-544.
Litwin, A., Perova, E., & Reynolds, S. A. (2019). A conditional cash transfer and Women`s empowerment: Does Bolsa Familia Influence intimate partner violence? Social Science & Medicine, 238, 112462.
Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining analysis. International economic review, 31-44.
McCord, J. (1978). A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects. American psychologist, 33(3), 284.
McDonell, J. R., Ben-Arieh, A., & Melton, G. B. (2015). Strong Communities for Children: Results of a multi-year community-based initiative to protect children from harm. Child Abuse & Neglect, 41, 79-96.
Mookerjee, M., Ojha, M., & Roy, S. (2022). Who’s your neighbour? Social influences on domestic violence. The Journal of Development Studies, 58(2), 350-369.
Portwood, S. G., Lambert, R. G., Abrams, L. P., & Nelson, E. B. (2011). An evaluation of the adults and children together (ACT) against violence parents raising safe kids program. The journal of primary prevention, 32(3), 147-160.
Ridley, M., Rao, G., Schilbach, F., & Patel, V. (2020). Poverty, depression, and anxiety: Causal evidence and mechanisms. science, 370(6522), eaay0214.
Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American journal of sociology, 94(4), 774-802.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918-924.
Sandler, D. H. (2017). Externalities of public housing: The effect of public housing demolitions on local crime. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 62, 24-35.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: University of Chicago Press.
Walker, L. E. (1989). Psychology and violence against women. American psychologist, 44(4), 695.
Walker, L. E. (2016). The battered woman syndrome: Springer publishing company New York.
李自強（2013）。家庭暴力的代間傳遞：一位觸法少年的個案分享。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，9（2），頁121-136。
沈瓊桃（2010）。暴力的童年，堅韌的青年：目睹婚暴暨受虐青年復原力之探討。中華輔導與諮商學報（27），頁115-160。
沈瓊桃（2018）。處罰父母，拯救小孩？臺灣強制性親職教育輔導的結果評估：以兒虐再通報率為指標。社會政策與社會工作學刊，22（1），頁97-133。
沈瓊桃、童伊迪（2018）。婚暴併兒虐家庭之多元模式與發生情境。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，14（2），頁73-104。
阮菲（2019）。多元時代的挑戰—安康平宅社區家長參與ACT親職教育方案之經驗。國立政治大學輔導與諮商碩士學位學程論文，臺北市。
林明禛（2019）。探討重複開案受虐兒童家庭特質及社工處遇。東吳社會工作學報（36），頁33-56。
林長杰（2000）。窮人的烙印：以台北市安康平宅為例。國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文，臺北市。
林雅容、林東龍、陳杏容、歐紫彤、潘淑滿（2016）。親密關係暴力：臺灣女性之受暴與求助經驗。臺灣社會工作學刊
林萬億（2003）。論我國的社會住宅政策與（17），頁13-41。社會照顧的結合。國家政策季刊，2（4），頁 53-82。
夏鑄九（1991）。臺北市平價住宅改建先期規劃案。臺北市：臺北市政府社會局。
師豫玲、孫淑文、陳肯玉（2008）。臺北市平價住宅問題探討，因應策略與未來發展方向。社區發展季刊（121），頁100-119。
陳杏容（2022）。兒少經歷家庭經濟困境者於成年初顯期的復原力經驗探究。東吳社會工作學報（42），頁93-122。
陳杏容、陳易甫（2019）。早期家庭經濟劣勢與成年初顯期發展成果之潛在剖析分析與其影響因子。中華心理衛生學刊，32（1），頁89-117。
傅如馨（2017）。含攝文化的兒少虐待預防與親職教育：以美國ACT Raising Safe Kids親職教育方案的文化調適為例。本土諮商心理學學刊，9（3），頁1-24。
彭淑華（2008）。兒虐致死危險因子與防治策略之研究。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集（11），頁231-266。
曾許達（2010）。平宅青少年的生活經驗—一個以青少年為主體陳述的探討。國立臺北大學社會工作學系碩士論文，臺北市。
游士嫺（2010）。罪惡不能侵擾之蒂－臺灣低犯罪率鄉鎮市區影響因素之研究。國立臺北大學犯罪學研究所碩士論文，臺北市。
游美貴（2015）。家庭暴力防治：社工對被害人服務實務。臺北市：洪葉文化。
黃心怡、楊愉安、溫筱雯、林良穗、沈瓊桃（2016）。都是權控惹的禍？多元化親密伴侶暴力型態之服務挑戰─以大台北地區聲請保護令案件為例。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，12（2），頁85-112。
黃筠媛（2014）。陪伴工作對平宅青少年的意義。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士倫文，臺北市。
黃翠紋、林淑君（2014）。不同類型家庭暴力事件成因及特性之研究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，10（2），頁91-129。
廖硃岑、周瑛梅、吳柏叡（2017）。台北市出租型公共住宅政策之研究。高大人文學報（2），頁63-95。
劉淑瓊（2021)）。系統除錯？個人咎責？台灣重大兒虐事件檢討機制之探究。臺灣社會工作學刊（44），頁1-44。
潘文欣（2021）。ACT Raising Safe Kids 親職教育方案應用於多元需求家庭之經驗探究。國立政治大學輔導與諮商碩士學位學程論文，臺北市。
潘淑滿（2021）。顧家難顧己：多重關係脈絡下的親密伴侶暴力。東吳社會工作學報（40），頁1-33。
鄭瑞隆（2007）。兒童虐待與少年偏差：問題與防治。臺北市：心理出版社。
藍佩嘉（2019）。拚教養：全球化、親職焦慮與不平等童年。臺北市：春山出版。
龔家琳、趙善如（2016)）。少年受虐事件的揭露：從兒童虐待走到少年虐待。臺灣社會工作學刊（33），頁1-41。		zh_TW