學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 探究手機時代的時間管理： 活動理論與符擔性的視角
Investigating Time Management in the Age of Mobile Phones: A Perspective of Activity Theory and Affordance作者 林鈺穎
Lin, Yu-Ying貢獻者 鍾蔚文
Chung, Wei-Wen
林鈺穎
Lin, Yu-Ying關鍵詞 符擔性
活動理論
自我民族誌
社會時間
時間管理
Affordance
Activity Theory
Autoethnography
Social Time
Time Management日期 2023 上傳時間 1-Sep-2023 15:43:38 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究意在探尋手機與社會時間之關係。主流的時間研究向來視技術為社會時間變化的主導因素，卻鮮少關注技術與使用者及其使用脈絡的緊密關係。此外，手機作為重要技術之一，也普遍被視作造成社會時間焦慮的元兇。究其原因，是人們忽視了手機、使用者與情境的互動關係所致。循此動機，本研究回顧了有關時間的定義並確認了時間的社會建構性。因而，手機對時間的影響，則可以從人們日常生活中與時間相關的行動和經驗中進行探究，本文將此行動稱之為時間管理。為進一步對時間管理進行討論，本研究結合了符擔性理論和活動理論的視角，主張將技術與使用者的互動過程放置於更大的活動脈絡中檢視。經由分析，本研究總結了四種手機時代的時間管理方法，即時間共享、時間集置、時間多工化與時間即時化。研究發現，與手機相關的時間管理方法，是活動系統中的社群、規則、分工、工具、活動主體、目標六個要素共同交互的結果。與此同時，此一結果還會隨著某一要素的變化而變化，進而使得整體脈絡得以發展。正是在這樣的過程中，手機這一新技術的誕生才浮現出了與傳統不同的時間管理方法。因此，技術與社會時間之間，有著更為複雜的共變關係。社會時間中的活動主體在行動的過程中會創造和改變技術，而技術也會反過來對社會時間產生影響，進一步促進活動主體之行動。
This study aims to explore the relationship between mobile phones and social time. Mainstream time studies have typically regarded technology as the primary driver of changes in social time, but have often overlooked the close connection between technology, users, and usage contexts. Additionally, mobile phones, being a significant technology, are commonly seen as a leading source of social time anxiety. This is rooted in the fact that people disregard the interactive relationship among mobile phones, users, and contexts.Motivated by this, this study revisits time definitions and acknowledges the social construct of time. Consequently, the impact of mobile phones on time can be investigated through people`s daily actions and experiences related to time, referred to in this paper as "time management." To further discuss time management, this study integrates the perspectives of affordance and activity theory, advocating for examining the interaction process between technology and users within a broader activity context.Through analysis, this study outlines four time management approaches in the mobile phone era: time-sharing, time allocation, multitasking, and real-time synchronization of activities. The research findings indicate that mobile phone-related time management approaches result from the interaction of six elements within an activity system: community, rules, division of labor, tools, subjects, and goals. Meanwhile, this outcome evolves with changes in any of these elements, shaping the overall context. It`s within this process that novel time management approaches distinct from tradition emerge with the advent of mobile phone. Consequently, a more intricate covariant relationship exists between technology and social time. Activity subjects within social time, through their actions, create and modify technology, and technology, in turn, influences social time, further facilitating the actions of activity subjects.參考文獻 中文部分王淑美（2014）。<傳播科技與生活韻律——關於研究方法的探討>。《傳播研究與實踐》，4（1）23-43。成令方、林鶴玲、吳嘉苓譯（2001）。見樹又見林：社會學作為一種生活、實踐與承諾（A. G. Johnson 原著，1997 年出版）。臺北：群學。李世宏（2010）。<初探方法論上的整體主義: 涂爾幹 [社會事實] 觀點之運用>。《國立虎尾科技大學學報》，29（3）：103-112。宋世祥（2020）。《百工裡的人類學家2：厚數據的創新課》。臺北：果力文化。宋文里譯（2001）。教育的文化（J. Bruner 原著，1996 年出版）。臺北：遠流。余貞誼（2018）。<鑲嵌性的時間經驗：社群媒介於日常的時間實作分析>。《台灣社會學》，35:1-57。林宏濤譯（2018）。《時間之書》。臺北：商周出版。（原書Safranski, R. [2015]. Zeit: was sie mit uns macht und was wir aus ihr machen. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG.）林熙堯（2021）。<我們與書寫的距離：探索新舊書寫媒介科技的身體感>。國立政治大學碩士論文。周海濤（2009）。《質性研究中的訪談：教育與社會科學研究者指南》。重慶：重慶大學出版社。范信賢（2013）。<敘事探究的社會學想像：個體經驗與社會脈絡的交織>。《課程與教學》，16（1）：139-157。曹家榮（2008）。 。《資訊社會研究》，14：133-166。張春興（1991）。《現代心理學》。台北：東華。張書華（2008）。<現代性的追求：晚清時間意識之轉變及其意涵>。東華大學中國文學系碩士論文。黃厚銘、曹家榮（2015）。<流動的手機：液態現代性的時空架構與群己關係>。《新聞學研究》，124：39-81。鄭宇君（2017）。<探討社交媒體事件之浮現邏輯：一個融合STS與傳播研究取徑之嘗試>。《中華傳播學刊》，32：129-164。鄭作彧（2008）。<駕馭速度 (?) 的理論：評哈穆特•羅沙《加速：現代時間結構的改變》>，《文化研究》，7：244-257。鄭作彧（2009）。<時間即生活：Norbert Elias的時間社會學簡介>。《文化研究月報》，88：35-39。鄭作彧（2013）。<時間生態學：時間社會學的新研究概念建立之嘗試>。《臺灣社會學刊》，52：31-78。鄭作彧（2018）。《社會的時間：形成、變遷與問題》。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。鍾蔚文、陳百齡、陳順孝（2006）。<數位時代的技藝：提出一個分析架構>。《中華傳播學刊》，10：233-264。羅麗君（2020）。〈時間〉。《華文哲學百科》（2021 版本），王一奇（編）。英文部分Anthony Chemero. (2009). Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. London: The MIT Press.Arun Vishwanath. (2016). Mobile device affordance: Explicating how smartphones influence the outcome of phishing attacks. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 198-207.Bærentsen, K. B., & Trettvik, J. (2002). An activity theory approach to affordance. In Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 51-60).Bateson, G. (1972). Form, substance, and difference. In Steps to an ecology of mind (2ded.). New York: Ballantine Books.Bittman, M., Brown, J. E., & Wajcman, J. (2009). The mobile phone, perpetual contact and time pressure. Work, Employment and Society, 23(4), 673–691.Bourdieu, P. (1972/1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Brandell, J. R., & Varkas, T. (2001). Narrative case studies. In B. A. Thyer (Ed.), The handbook of social work research methods (pp. 294-307). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, 1-46.Cross, G., (1993). Time and Money – The Making of Consumer Culture, London: Routledge.D`Andrade, R. (1986). Three scientific world views and the covering law model. In D. Fiske & R. Shweder (Eds.), Meta-theory in the social sciences(pp.19-41). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Duxbury, L., Towers, I., Higgins, C., & Thomas, J. A. (2007). From 9 to 5 to 24/7: How technology has redefined the workday. In Information resources management: Global challenges (pp. 305-332). IGI Global.Durkheim, E. (2016). The elementary forms of religious life. In Social Theory Re-Wired (pp. 52-67). Routledge.Elizabetta Adami & Gunther Kres. (2010). A social semiotic analysis of mobile devices: Interrelations of technology and social habitus. In book: Mobile learning: structure, agency, practices (pp.185-203). Publisher: SpringerEditors: Pachler, N and Bachmair, B and Cook, J.Engel-Frisch, Gladys. (1943). ‘Some Neglected Temporal Aspects of Human Ecology’, Social Forces, 22, 43–47.Fine, G. A. (1990). Organizational time: Temporal demands and the experience of work in restaurant kitchens. Social Forces, 69, 95-114.Fussell, S. R. & Krauss, R. M. (1989). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203-19.Gaver, W. (1991). Technology affordances. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, 79-84.Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (Original work published 1979)Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Goodson, I. F. (1992b). Studying teachers’ lives: Problem and possibilities. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 234-249). London: Routledge.Harvey, D. (1989). The Conditions of Postmodernity. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.James Gleick. (1999). Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything. New York: Pantheon Books.Katz, J. E., & Aakhus, M. (Eds.). (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge University Press.Manuel Castell, Mireia Fernandez-Ardevol, Jack Linchuan Qiu, & Araba Sey. (2007). Mobile communication and society: a global perspective. Cambridge: the MIT press.Manuel Castells. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.McLoughlin, Aoife. (2016) Time flies when you`re having phone. Australasian Science, 2016(11), 24-25.Morgenroth, Olaf. (2003). Gehgeschwindigkeit und Lebenstempo: Kurzbericht zur Städtestudie. Chemnitz：Technische Universität.Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and Civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Lauer, R. H. (1981). Temporal man: The meaning and uses of social time. New York, NY: Praeger.Lee, Heejin and Jonathan Liebenau. (2000). Temporal Effects of Information Systems on Business Processes: Focusing on the Dimensions of Temporality. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 10(3), 157-185.Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. J. (1981). The structures and meanings of social time. Social forces, 60(2), 432-462.Leont`ev, A. N. (1978). Activity. Consciousness.Personality. Prentice-Hall, N.J. (originally published 1977).Luhmann, Niklas. (1971). Die Knappheit der Zeit und die Vordringlichkeit des Befristeten. Pp. 143-164 in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung, edited by Niklas Luhmann. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Rosa, H. (2003). Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high-speed society. Constellations, 10, 3-33.Schütz, Alfred, & Luckmann, Thomas. (2003). Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Konstanz: UVK.Southerton, Dale and Mark Tomlinson. (2005). ‘Pressed for Time’– the Differential Impacts of a ‘Time Squeeze’. The Sociological Review, 53(2), 215-239.Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design (Vol. 1). Mit Press.Suchman, L. A.(1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge etc.Virilio, Paul. (1991). The Lost Dimension. New York: Semiotext(e).Wajcman, J., Bittman, M., & Brown, J. E. (2008). Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions. Sociology, 42(4), 635–652.Wajcman, J. (2014). Pressed for time. In Pressed for Time. University of Chicago Press.Weibel, Peter. (1987). Die Beschleunigung der Bilder in der Chronokratie. Bern: Benteli.Wendy Parkins, & Geoffrey Craig. (2006). Slow Living. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Xiangming, L. & Song, S. (2018). Mobile technology affordance and its social implications: A case of 「Rain Classroom」. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49, 276-291.Zerubavel, Eviatar. (1976). Timetables and Scheduling: On the Social Organization of Time. Sociological Inquiry, 46(2), 87-94. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
108464069資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108464069 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 鍾蔚文 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chung, Wei-Wen en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林鈺穎 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lin, Yu-Ying en_US dc.creator (作者) 林鈺穎 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Lin, Yu-Ying en_US dc.date (日期) 2023 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Sep-2023 15:43:38 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Sep-2023 15:43:38 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Sep-2023 15:43:38 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0108464069 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147112 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 108464069 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究意在探尋手機與社會時間之關係。主流的時間研究向來視技術為社會時間變化的主導因素，卻鮮少關注技術與使用者及其使用脈絡的緊密關係。此外，手機作為重要技術之一，也普遍被視作造成社會時間焦慮的元兇。究其原因，是人們忽視了手機、使用者與情境的互動關係所致。循此動機，本研究回顧了有關時間的定義並確認了時間的社會建構性。因而，手機對時間的影響，則可以從人們日常生活中與時間相關的行動和經驗中進行探究，本文將此行動稱之為時間管理。為進一步對時間管理進行討論，本研究結合了符擔性理論和活動理論的視角，主張將技術與使用者的互動過程放置於更大的活動脈絡中檢視。經由分析，本研究總結了四種手機時代的時間管理方法，即時間共享、時間集置、時間多工化與時間即時化。研究發現，與手機相關的時間管理方法，是活動系統中的社群、規則、分工、工具、活動主體、目標六個要素共同交互的結果。與此同時，此一結果還會隨著某一要素的變化而變化，進而使得整體脈絡得以發展。正是在這樣的過程中，手機這一新技術的誕生才浮現出了與傳統不同的時間管理方法。因此，技術與社會時間之間，有著更為複雜的共變關係。社會時間中的活動主體在行動的過程中會創造和改變技術，而技術也會反過來對社會時間產生影響，進一步促進活動主體之行動。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study aims to explore the relationship between mobile phones and social time. Mainstream time studies have typically regarded technology as the primary driver of changes in social time, but have often overlooked the close connection between technology, users, and usage contexts. Additionally, mobile phones, being a significant technology, are commonly seen as a leading source of social time anxiety. This is rooted in the fact that people disregard the interactive relationship among mobile phones, users, and contexts.Motivated by this, this study revisits time definitions and acknowledges the social construct of time. Consequently, the impact of mobile phones on time can be investigated through people`s daily actions and experiences related to time, referred to in this paper as "time management." To further discuss time management, this study integrates the perspectives of affordance and activity theory, advocating for examining the interaction process between technology and users within a broader activity context.Through analysis, this study outlines four time management approaches in the mobile phone era: time-sharing, time allocation, multitasking, and real-time synchronization of activities. The research findings indicate that mobile phone-related time management approaches result from the interaction of six elements within an activity system: community, rules, division of labor, tools, subjects, and goals. Meanwhile, this outcome evolves with changes in any of these elements, shaping the overall context. It`s within this process that novel time management approaches distinct from tradition emerge with the advent of mobile phone. Consequently, a more intricate covariant relationship exists between technology and social time. Activity subjects within social time, through their actions, create and modify technology, and technology, in turn, influences social time, further facilitating the actions of activity subjects. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第二章 文獻回顧 4壹、時間與時間管理 4貳、技術物如何影響時間？ 7叁、如何利用手機進行時間管理：符擔性的視角 10肆、活動理論 17第三章 研究問題 21第四章 研究方法 23第一節 自我民族誌方法 24第二節 研究設計與資料蒐集 26第五章 研究分析 29第一節 時間協商的方法：時間共享 29壹、情境描述 29貳、時間協商的方法：時間共享 30叁、時間共享之手機符擔性 32肆、時間共享之活動脈絡 35第二節 時間效益最大法：時間集置 38壹、情境描述 38貳、時間管理方法：時間集置 39叁、時間集置之手機符擔性 41肆、時間集置的活動脈絡 42第三節 多工處理的方法：時間多工化 45壹、情境描述 45貳、時間管理方法：時間多工化 47叁、時間多工化的手機符擔性與環境條件 48第四節 即時獲取資訊：時間即時化 51壹、使用場景 51貳、時間即時化 52叁、時間即時化的手機符擔性與活動脈絡 53第六章 研究結論 56第一節 研究發現 56壹、手機時代的時間管理方法 57貳、時間活動脈絡及其手機符擔性 58叁、社會時間的標準化與彈性化 60第二節 研究貢獻 62壹、活動脈絡下的技術與使用者 62貳、手機時代的時間特性 63第三節 研究限制與展望 64參考文獻 66 zh_TW dc.format.extent 3086300 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108464069 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 符擔性 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 活動理論 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自我民族誌 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會時間 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 時間管理 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Affordance en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Activity Theory en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Autoethnography en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social Time en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Time Management en_US dc.title (題名) 探究手機時代的時間管理： 活動理論與符擔性的視角 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Investigating Time Management in the Age of Mobile Phones: A Perspective of Activity Theory and Affordance en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分王淑美（2014）。<傳播科技與生活韻律——關於研究方法的探討>。《傳播研究與實踐》，4（1）23-43。成令方、林鶴玲、吳嘉苓譯（2001）。見樹又見林：社會學作為一種生活、實踐與承諾（A. G. Johnson 原著，1997 年出版）。臺北：群學。李世宏（2010）。<初探方法論上的整體主義: 涂爾幹 [社會事實] 觀點之運用>。《國立虎尾科技大學學報》，29（3）：103-112。宋世祥（2020）。《百工裡的人類學家2：厚數據的創新課》。臺北：果力文化。宋文里譯（2001）。教育的文化（J. Bruner 原著，1996 年出版）。臺北：遠流。余貞誼（2018）。<鑲嵌性的時間經驗：社群媒介於日常的時間實作分析>。《台灣社會學》，35:1-57。林宏濤譯（2018）。《時間之書》。臺北：商周出版。（原書Safranski, R. [2015]. Zeit: was sie mit uns macht und was wir aus ihr machen. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH Co KG.）林熙堯（2021）。<我們與書寫的距離：探索新舊書寫媒介科技的身體感>。國立政治大學碩士論文。周海濤（2009）。《質性研究中的訪談：教育與社會科學研究者指南》。重慶：重慶大學出版社。范信賢（2013）。<敘事探究的社會學想像：個體經驗與社會脈絡的交織>。《課程與教學》，16（1）：139-157。曹家榮（2008）。 。《資訊社會研究》，14：133-166。張春興（1991）。《現代心理學》。台北：東華。張書華（2008）。<現代性的追求：晚清時間意識之轉變及其意涵>。東華大學中國文學系碩士論文。黃厚銘、曹家榮（2015）。<流動的手機：液態現代性的時空架構與群己關係>。《新聞學研究》，124：39-81。鄭宇君（2017）。<探討社交媒體事件之浮現邏輯：一個融合STS與傳播研究取徑之嘗試>。《中華傳播學刊》，32：129-164。鄭作彧（2008）。<駕馭速度 (?) 的理論：評哈穆特•羅沙《加速：現代時間結構的改變》>，《文化研究》，7：244-257。鄭作彧（2009）。<時間即生活：Norbert Elias的時間社會學簡介>。《文化研究月報》，88：35-39。鄭作彧（2013）。<時間生態學：時間社會學的新研究概念建立之嘗試>。《臺灣社會學刊》，52：31-78。鄭作彧（2018）。《社會的時間：形成、變遷與問題》。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。鍾蔚文、陳百齡、陳順孝（2006）。<數位時代的技藝：提出一個分析架構>。《中華傳播學刊》，10：233-264。羅麗君（2020）。〈時間〉。《華文哲學百科》（2021 版本），王一奇（編）。英文部分Anthony Chemero. (2009). Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. London: The MIT Press.Arun Vishwanath. (2016). Mobile device affordance: Explicating how smartphones influence the outcome of phishing attacks. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 198-207.Bærentsen, K. B., & Trettvik, J. (2002). An activity theory approach to affordance. In Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 51-60).Bateson, G. (1972). Form, substance, and difference. In Steps to an ecology of mind (2ded.). New York: Ballantine Books.Bittman, M., Brown, J. E., & Wajcman, J. (2009). The mobile phone, perpetual contact and time pressure. Work, Employment and Society, 23(4), 673–691.Bourdieu, P. (1972/1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Brandell, J. R., & Varkas, T. (2001). Narrative case studies. In B. A. Thyer (Ed.), The handbook of social work research methods (pp. 294-307). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, 1-46.Cross, G., (1993). Time and Money – The Making of Consumer Culture, London: Routledge.D`Andrade, R. (1986). Three scientific world views and the covering law model. In D. Fiske & R. Shweder (Eds.), Meta-theory in the social sciences(pp.19-41). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Duxbury, L., Towers, I., Higgins, C., & Thomas, J. A. (2007). From 9 to 5 to 24/7: How technology has redefined the workday. In Information resources management: Global challenges (pp. 305-332). IGI Global.Durkheim, E. (2016). The elementary forms of religious life. In Social Theory Re-Wired (pp. 52-67). Routledge.Elizabetta Adami & Gunther Kres. (2010). A social semiotic analysis of mobile devices: Interrelations of technology and social habitus. In book: Mobile learning: structure, agency, practices (pp.185-203). Publisher: SpringerEditors: Pachler, N and Bachmair, B and Cook, J.Engel-Frisch, Gladys. (1943). ‘Some Neglected Temporal Aspects of Human Ecology’, Social Forces, 22, 43–47.Fine, G. A. (1990). Organizational time: Temporal demands and the experience of work in restaurant kitchens. Social Forces, 69, 95-114.Fussell, S. R. & Krauss, R. M. (1989). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203-19.Gaver, W. (1991). Technology affordances. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, 79-84.Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (Original work published 1979)Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Goodson, I. F. (1992b). Studying teachers’ lives: Problem and possibilities. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 234-249). London: Routledge.Harvey, D. (1989). The Conditions of Postmodernity. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.James Gleick. (1999). Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything. New York: Pantheon Books.Katz, J. E., & Aakhus, M. (Eds.). (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge University Press.Manuel Castell, Mireia Fernandez-Ardevol, Jack Linchuan Qiu, & Araba Sey. (2007). Mobile communication and society: a global perspective. Cambridge: the MIT press.Manuel Castells. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.McLoughlin, Aoife. (2016) Time flies when you`re having phone. Australasian Science, 2016(11), 24-25.Morgenroth, Olaf. (2003). Gehgeschwindigkeit und Lebenstempo: Kurzbericht zur Städtestudie. Chemnitz：Technische Universität.Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and Civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Lauer, R. H. (1981). Temporal man: The meaning and uses of social time. New York, NY: Praeger.Lee, Heejin and Jonathan Liebenau. (2000). Temporal Effects of Information Systems on Business Processes: Focusing on the Dimensions of Temporality. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 10(3), 157-185.Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. J. (1981). The structures and meanings of social time. Social forces, 60(2), 432-462.Leont`ev, A. N. (1978). Activity. Consciousness.Personality. Prentice-Hall, N.J. (originally published 1977).Luhmann, Niklas. (1971). Die Knappheit der Zeit und die Vordringlichkeit des Befristeten. Pp. 143-164 in Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung, edited by Niklas Luhmann. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Rosa, H. (2003). Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high-speed society. Constellations, 10, 3-33.Schütz, Alfred, & Luckmann, Thomas. (2003). Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Konstanz: UVK.Southerton, Dale and Mark Tomlinson. (2005). ‘Pressed for Time’– the Differential Impacts of a ‘Time Squeeze’. The Sociological Review, 53(2), 215-239.Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design (Vol. 1). Mit Press.Suchman, L. A.(1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge etc.Virilio, Paul. (1991). The Lost Dimension. New York: Semiotext(e).Wajcman, J., Bittman, M., & Brown, J. E. (2008). Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions. Sociology, 42(4), 635–652.Wajcman, J. (2014). Pressed for time. In Pressed for Time. University of Chicago Press.Weibel, Peter. (1987). Die Beschleunigung der Bilder in der Chronokratie. Bern: Benteli.Wendy Parkins, & Geoffrey Craig. (2006). Slow Living. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Xiangming, L. & Song, S. (2018). Mobile technology affordance and its social implications: A case of 「Rain Classroom」. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49, 276-291.Zerubavel, Eviatar. (1976). Timetables and Scheduling: On the Social Organization of Time. Sociological Inquiry, 46(2), 87-94. zh_TW
