學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 Do work stressors relate to social support provision? An actor-partner interdependent model among dual-earner couples
作者 曹銀愛
Cho, Eunae;Chariatte, Cyril;Meier, Laurenz L.
貢獻者 企管系
日期 2023-05
上傳時間 29-Jan-2024 09:11:32 (UTC+8)
摘要 Although the benefits of receiving social support are well established, less is known about the antecedents of providing support, particularly to one’s partner. As many employees in today’s world are members of dual-earner couples, they may face the challenge of dealing with their own work stress while supporting their partner. To extend our understanding of the relationship between work stress and providing social support at home, we conducted a study with 147 dual-earner couples. Bridging the spillover-crossover model and the systemic transactional model, we examined whether individuals facing high work stressors (time pressure and lack of reciprocity) provide less emotional (e.g., signaling empathy) and instrumental (e.g., offering practical help) support and more dysfunctional (e.g., hostile and superficial) support, while receiving more support from their partner. We further explored whether employees’ and partners’ work stressors interact to predict the provision of social support and whether the hypothesized effects differ across genders. Findings using the actor–partner interdependence model indicated that employees facing higher work stressors tend to provide more dysfunctional support, but not less emotional and instrumental support, while receiving more emotional and instrumental support from their partner. The interaction between employee’s and partner’s work stressors did not predict social support provision. No gender differences emerged.
關聯 International Journal of Stress Management, Vol.30, No.2, pp.162-171
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000288
dc.contributor 企管系
dc.creator (作者) 曹銀愛
dc.creator (作者) Cho, Eunae;Chariatte, Cyril;Meier, Laurenz L.
dc.date (日期) 2023-05
dc.date.accessioned 29-Jan-2024 09:11:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 29-Jan-2024 09:11:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Jan-2024 09:11:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149387-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Although the benefits of receiving social support are well established, less is known about the antecedents of providing support, particularly to one’s partner. As many employees in today’s world are members of dual-earner couples, they may face the challenge of dealing with their own work stress while supporting their partner. To extend our understanding of the relationship between work stress and providing social support at home, we conducted a study with 147 dual-earner couples. Bridging the spillover-crossover model and the systemic transactional model, we examined whether individuals facing high work stressors (time pressure and lack of reciprocity) provide less emotional (e.g., signaling empathy) and instrumental (e.g., offering practical help) support and more dysfunctional (e.g., hostile and superficial) support, while receiving more support from their partner. We further explored whether employees’ and partners’ work stressors interact to predict the provision of social support and whether the hypothesized effects differ across genders. Findings using the actor–partner interdependence model indicated that employees facing higher work stressors tend to provide more dysfunctional support, but not less emotional and instrumental support, while receiving more emotional and instrumental support from their partner. The interaction between employee’s and partner’s work stressors did not predict social support provision. No gender differences emerged.
dc.format.extent 98 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) International Journal of Stress Management, Vol.30, No.2, pp.162-171
dc.title (題名) Do work stressors relate to social support provision? An actor-partner interdependent model among dual-earner couples
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1037/str0000288
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000288