| dc.contributor | 哲學系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 鄭會穎 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | Cheng, Tony | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2023-09 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 5-Mar-2024 15:39:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 5-Mar-2024 15:39:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 5-Mar-2024 15:39:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150338 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The target article argues that language-of-thought hypothesis (LoTH) is applicable to various domains, including perception. However, it focusses exclusively on the visual case, which is limited in this regard. I argue for two ideas in this commentary: first, their case can be extended to other modalities such as touch; and second, the status of those six criteria needs to be further clarified. | |
| dc.format.extent | 105 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.46, e270 | |
| dc.title (題名) | The language of tactile thought | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.1017/S0140525X2300208X | |
| dc.doi.uri (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X2300208X | |
