學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 幻想與消費行為:幻想量表之建製
Fantasy and Consumption Behaviors: Developing the Fantasy Scale
作者 黃依婷
Huang, I-Ting
貢獻者 別蓮蒂
Bei, Lien-Ti
黃依婷
Huang, I-Ting
關鍵詞 幻想
消費幻想
量表建製
日期 2005
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 16:45:56 (UTC+8)
摘要 消費者為了滿足或接近幻想而產生的消費行為稱之「消費幻想」,雖然這個消費新趨勢已受到消費者行為研究者的注目,但是由於缺乏一般化的量化分析工具,過去只能以深入訪談等質化方式,討論特定類型的消費幻想 (Belk and Costa, 1998; Martin, 2004; 李德儀,2005),無法全面瞭解此一構念,因此本研究之主要目的便是建製一個可穩定有效衡量幻想程度的量表,預測其消費幻想程度。
      本研究回顧過去研究,歸納出幻想來自於消費者心中未滿足的需求或缺憾,且應包括「個人感受性」、「非現實」、「未實現」與「期待感」四個要素,而幻想內容則涵蓋「認知實現機率」、「過去自身經驗相關度」、「外顯具體化程度」、「個人感受細膩度」與「持續程度」五大連續構面。
      參考多位學者建製量表之過程 (Zaichkowsky, 1985; Lichtenstein et al., 1990; Churchill, 1979),本研究利用上述幻想面向發展題項題庫,經過四次專家評估修正題項題庫,設計出幻想量表初稿,再利用兩階段表面效度分析發展第一版幻想量表後,針對18歲至26歲學生進行四次小規模施測,並以內部一致性信度分析結果純化量表,建製出正式量表。最後收集新資料,進行信度分析、驗證性因素分析與效標關連效度分析,建製出一套19題李克特形式五點尺度的幻想量表,量表的內部一致性Cronbach’s Alpha值為0.93,再測信度為0.93,涵蓋「脫離現實的愉悅感」、「非現實」、「個人感受細膩度」與「外顯具體化程度」四大構面。透過分析敘述統計量,本研究認為量表總分超過75分之年輕學生,屬高度幻想者且高消費幻想潛力;量表總分低於50分之年經學生,則為低度幻想者且消費幻想潛力也低。
      此外,從文獻中發現消費幻想程度高者,易出現不理性消費與固著式消費傾向,認為可以作為消費幻想之效標,且因為沒有這兩種消費傾向之量表,本研究經由上述建製流程,同步發展出不理性消費與固著式消費傾向兩個量表,最後透過效標關連效度分析,確認固著式消費傾向較適合做為幻想之效標。
Consumption fantasy means a fantasy-driven consumption behavior. Although Consumer Behavior researchers have paid great attention to this new consumption trend, researchers could only discuss some specific consumption fantasy behaviors by qualitative methods due to the lack of quantitative analysis tools (Belk and Costa, 1998; Martin, 2004; Julia Lee, 2005). Therefore, this construct cannot be explored comprehensively so far. This study aims at developing a scale that can not only measure fantasy stably and effectively but predict consumption fantasy level.
      Through literature review, fantasy is originated from unmet demand or imperfection, containing four factors which are “Personal Perception”, “Unreality”, “Unrealization”, and “Expectative Feeling”. The content of fantasy covers five dimensions that are the probability of “Perceptive Realization”, the degree of “Pass Experience Relatedness”, “Embodiment”, “Fineness”, and “Persistency”.
      Referring to some researchers about scale development (Zaichkowsky, 1985; Lichtenstein et al., 1990; Churchill, 1979), these factors and dimensions mentioned above had come into use in generating items pool. Four panel discussions were held on the revision of items pool and the first draft of fantasy scale was developed. The first edition of this scale was created by means of two-staged face validity analysis. Four small-scale surveys were executed and respondents are students, ranging from 18 to 26 years old. The first edition scale is purified and become formal fantasy scale through assessing internal consistency reliability. The last new data is collected by formal scale and internal consistency reliability, confirmatory factor analysis and criterion-related validity, which are measured for assessing the quality of formal fantasy scale. Moreover, two groups of another new data are collected for assessing test-retest reliability.
      Through the process mentioned above, fantasy scale, which contains 19 Likert-type items, is developed. And Cronbach’s Alpha of this scale is 0.93; test-retest reliability is 0.93. This scale covers four dimensions, which are “Delight of Fleeing from Reality”, “Unreality”, the degree of “Fineness” and “Embodiment”. The young students whose scale score is over 75 are grouped into high degree of fantasy and easily transform their fantasy into consumption behaviors,on the other hand, the young students whose scale score is below 50 are categorized in low degree of fantasy and hardly transform their fantasy into consumption behaviors.
      Besides, irrational consumption tendency and fixated consumption tendency are discovered to be the criterion of consumption fantasy from literature review. For the lack of measure tools for these two consumption tendencies, the similar development process is adopted for developing another two scales. By assessing criterion-related validity, fixated consumption tendency is confirmed to be fitter for criterion of fantasy.
參考文獻 中廣新聞網。哈利波特第六集 全球已賣了三億本。奇摩新聞〔網路〕。2005 Oct. 4。2005 Oct. 24引用。取得網址:http://tw.news.yahoo.com/051005/4/2djxj.html
李德儀 (2005)。年輕人的幻想與消費幻想之初探與架構建立。國立政治大學企業管系碩士論文。
林重新 (2001)。心理與教育測驗。台北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
葛樹人 (1999)。心理測驗學—Psychological Testing and Assessment。台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。
American Psychological Association (1954), “Technical Recommendations for Psychological Tests and Diagnostic Techniques,” Psychological Bulletin Supplement, 51, 2.
Anastasi, Anne and Susana Urbina (1997), Psychological Testing , New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 7th Ed.
Armitt, Lucie (1996), Theorising the Fantastic, New York: St. Martin`s Press.
Belk, Russell W., Guliz Ger, and Søren Askegaard (2003), “Tthe Fire of Desire: A Multisited Inquiry into Consumer Passion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (December), 326-351.
Belk, Russell W. and Janeen Arnold Costa (1998), “The Mountain Man Myth: A Contemporary Consumption Fantasy,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (December), 218-240.
Campbell, Colin (1987), The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism, London: Blackwell, 83-85.
Campbell, Donald T. and Donald W. Fiske (1959), “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-multimethod Matrix,” Psychological Bulletin, 56 (March), 81-105.
Churchill, Gilbert A. Jr. (1979), “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 64-73.
Cronbach, Lee J. (1951), “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,” Psychometrika, 16 (September), 297-334.
Cronbach, Lee J. and Paul E. Meehl (1955), “Construct Validity in Psychological Tests,” Psychological Bulletin, 52 (July), 281-302.
Corsini, Raymond J. (1994), Encyclopedia of Psychology, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2nd Ed.., v2, 11-12.
Eysenck, HansJurgen, Wilhelm Arnold, and Richard Meili (1972), Encyclopedia of Psychology, New York: Herder and Herder, 367-369.
Fenichel, Otto M. D. (1945), The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 49-51.
Heeler, Roger M. and Michael L. Ray (1972), “Measure Validation in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (November), 361-370.
Holbrook, Morris B. and Elizabeth C. Hirschman (1982), “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (September), 132-140.
Holbrook, Morris B. and Elizabeth C. Hirschman (1982), “Hedonic Consumption Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (Summer), 92-101.
Jacoby, Jacob (1978), “Consumer Research: A State of the Art Review,” Journal of Marketing, 42 (April), 87-96.
Leach, William (1993), Land of Desire: Merchants, Power, and the Rise of a New American Culture, New York: Random House.
Lichtenstein, Donald R., Richard G. Netemeyer and Scot Burton (1990), “Distinguishing Coupon Proneness from Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (July), 54-67.
Long, Mary M. and Leon G. Schiffman (1997), “Swatch Fever: An Allegory for Understanding the Paradox of Collecting,” Psychology & Marketing, 14 (August), 495-509.
Martin, Brett A. S. (2004), “Using the Imagination: Consumer Evoking and Thematizing of the Fantastic Imaginary,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (June), 136-149.
McClelland, David C. (1959), Studies in Motivation, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 63-70.
Murray, Henry A. (1938), “Types of Human Needs,” In McClelland David C. (1959), Studies in Motivation, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 63-70.
Parameswaran Ravi, Barnett A. Greenberg, Danny N. Bellenger, and Dan H. Robertson (1979), “Measuring Reliability: A Comparison of Alternative Techniques,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 18-25.
Peter, Paul J. (1979), “Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 6-17.
----------------- (1981), “Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (May), 133-145.
Rapaport, David (1951), Organization and Pathology of Thought: Selected Sources, New York and London: Columbia University Press, Bleuler, Eugen (1912), “Das autistische Denken,” Juhrbuch fiir Psychoanalytische and Psychopathologische Forchungen, 4, 1-39.
Ray, Michael L. (1979), “The Critical Need for a Marketing Measurement Tradition: A Proposal,” in O. C. Ferrell, Stephen W. Brown and Charles W. Lamb, Jr. eds. , Conceptual and Theoretical Development in Marketing, 34-48.
-------------------- (1979), “Introduction to the Special Section: Measurement and Marketing Research –Is the Flirtation Going to Lead to A Romance?” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 1-5
Rook, Dennis W. (1988), “Researching Consumer Fantasy,” in Research in Consumer Behavior, vol. 3, 247-270.
Schiffman, Leon G. and Kanuk Leslie Lazar (2004), Consumer Behavior, 8th Ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, 84-115.
Simmel, Georg (1978), The Philosophy of Money, trans. Tom Bottomore and David Frisby (1900), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Spearman, Charles (1904), “The Proof and Measurement of the Association between Two Things,” American Journal of Psychology, (January), 72-101.
----------------------- (1910), “Correlation Calculated from Faulty Data,” British Journal of Psychology, (October), 271-295.
Thomas, Nigel J. T. (1999), “Are Theories of Imagery, Theories of Imagination? An Active Perception Approach to Conscious Mental Content,” Cognitive Science, 23 (2), 207-45.
White, Alan R. (1990), The Language of Imagination, New York: Blackwell.
Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, (December), 341-352.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所
93355018
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093355018
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 別蓮蒂zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Bei, Lien-Tien_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃依婷zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Huang, I-Tingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 黃依婷zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Huang, I-Tingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 16:45:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 16:45:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 16:45:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0093355018en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29869-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93355018zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 消費者為了滿足或接近幻想而產生的消費行為稱之「消費幻想」,雖然這個消費新趨勢已受到消費者行為研究者的注目,但是由於缺乏一般化的量化分析工具,過去只能以深入訪談等質化方式,討論特定類型的消費幻想 (Belk and Costa, 1998; Martin, 2004; 李德儀,2005),無法全面瞭解此一構念,因此本研究之主要目的便是建製一個可穩定有效衡量幻想程度的量表,預測其消費幻想程度。
      本研究回顧過去研究,歸納出幻想來自於消費者心中未滿足的需求或缺憾,且應包括「個人感受性」、「非現實」、「未實現」與「期待感」四個要素,而幻想內容則涵蓋「認知實現機率」、「過去自身經驗相關度」、「外顯具體化程度」、「個人感受細膩度」與「持續程度」五大連續構面。
      參考多位學者建製量表之過程 (Zaichkowsky, 1985; Lichtenstein et al., 1990; Churchill, 1979),本研究利用上述幻想面向發展題項題庫,經過四次專家評估修正題項題庫,設計出幻想量表初稿,再利用兩階段表面效度分析發展第一版幻想量表後,針對18歲至26歲學生進行四次小規模施測,並以內部一致性信度分析結果純化量表,建製出正式量表。最後收集新資料,進行信度分析、驗證性因素分析與效標關連效度分析,建製出一套19題李克特形式五點尺度的幻想量表,量表的內部一致性Cronbach’s Alpha值為0.93,再測信度為0.93,涵蓋「脫離現實的愉悅感」、「非現實」、「個人感受細膩度」與「外顯具體化程度」四大構面。透過分析敘述統計量,本研究認為量表總分超過75分之年輕學生,屬高度幻想者且高消費幻想潛力;量表總分低於50分之年經學生,則為低度幻想者且消費幻想潛力也低。
      此外,從文獻中發現消費幻想程度高者,易出現不理性消費與固著式消費傾向,認為可以作為消費幻想之效標,且因為沒有這兩種消費傾向之量表,本研究經由上述建製流程,同步發展出不理性消費與固著式消費傾向兩個量表,最後透過效標關連效度分析,確認固著式消費傾向較適合做為幻想之效標。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Consumption fantasy means a fantasy-driven consumption behavior. Although Consumer Behavior researchers have paid great attention to this new consumption trend, researchers could only discuss some specific consumption fantasy behaviors by qualitative methods due to the lack of quantitative analysis tools (Belk and Costa, 1998; Martin, 2004; Julia Lee, 2005). Therefore, this construct cannot be explored comprehensively so far. This study aims at developing a scale that can not only measure fantasy stably and effectively but predict consumption fantasy level.
      Through literature review, fantasy is originated from unmet demand or imperfection, containing four factors which are “Personal Perception”, “Unreality”, “Unrealization”, and “Expectative Feeling”. The content of fantasy covers five dimensions that are the probability of “Perceptive Realization”, the degree of “Pass Experience Relatedness”, “Embodiment”, “Fineness”, and “Persistency”.
      Referring to some researchers about scale development (Zaichkowsky, 1985; Lichtenstein et al., 1990; Churchill, 1979), these factors and dimensions mentioned above had come into use in generating items pool. Four panel discussions were held on the revision of items pool and the first draft of fantasy scale was developed. The first edition of this scale was created by means of two-staged face validity analysis. Four small-scale surveys were executed and respondents are students, ranging from 18 to 26 years old. The first edition scale is purified and become formal fantasy scale through assessing internal consistency reliability. The last new data is collected by formal scale and internal consistency reliability, confirmatory factor analysis and criterion-related validity, which are measured for assessing the quality of formal fantasy scale. Moreover, two groups of another new data are collected for assessing test-retest reliability.
      Through the process mentioned above, fantasy scale, which contains 19 Likert-type items, is developed. And Cronbach’s Alpha of this scale is 0.93; test-retest reliability is 0.93. This scale covers four dimensions, which are “Delight of Fleeing from Reality”, “Unreality”, the degree of “Fineness” and “Embodiment”. The young students whose scale score is over 75 are grouped into high degree of fantasy and easily transform their fantasy into consumption behaviors,on the other hand, the young students whose scale score is below 50 are categorized in low degree of fantasy and hardly transform their fantasy into consumption behaviors.
      Besides, irrational consumption tendency and fixated consumption tendency are discovered to be the criterion of consumption fantasy from literature review. For the lack of measure tools for these two consumption tendencies, the similar development process is adopted for developing another two scales. By assessing criterion-related validity, fixated consumption tendency is confirmed to be fitter for criterion of fantasy.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 研究背景................................... 1
     第一節 研究動機................................... 3
     第二節 研究目的................................... 4
     第二章 文獻探討................................... 5
     第一節 幻想....................................... 5
     第二節 幻想的構面.................................. 15
     第三節 消費幻想................................... 19
     第四節 幻想與消費幻想相關之習慣或態度................ 21
     第五節 量表效度................................... 23
     第六節 量表信度................................... 27
     第三章 研究設計................................... 34
     第四章 量表建製過程................................ 39
     第一節 幻想量表初稿編製............................ 39
     第二節 表面效度................................... 45
     第三節 量表精簡化與純化............................ 47
     第四節 信度評估................................... 65
     第五節 驗證性因素分析.............................. 68
     第六節 再測信度分析................................ 69
     第七節 效標關連效度分析............................ 71
     第八節 基準發展................................... 73
     第五章 結論與建議.................................. 75
     第一節 研究成果與討論.............................. 75
     第二節 研究貢獻................................... 79
     第三節 研究限制與後續研究方向....................... 80
     附錄一 第一次幻想、不理性消費與固著式消費傾向量表初稿... 84
     附錄二 第二次幻想、不理性消費與固著式消費傾向量表初稿... 87
     附錄三 第三次幻想、不理性消費與固著式消費傾向量表初稿... 90
     附錄四 第四次幻想、不理性消費與固著式消費傾向量表初稿... 93
     附錄五 第五次幻想、不理性消費與固著式消費傾向量表初稿... 96
     附錄六 各構面的概念定義............................ 99
     附錄七 第五次幻想、不理性消費與固著式消費量表初稿之評分表. 100
     附錄八 第一版幻想、不理性消費與固著式消費傾向量表...... 103
     附錄九 表面效度分析結果............................ 106
     附錄十 第一次施測之問卷............................ 109
     附錄十一 第一次施測之因素分析結果.................... 112
     附錄十二 第二次施測之問卷........................... 117
     附錄十三 第二次施測之因素分析結果.................... 120
     附錄十四 第三次施測之問卷........................... 123
     附錄十五 第三次施測之因素分析結果.................... 125
     附錄十六 第四次施測之問卷........................... 127
     附錄十七 第四次施測資料之幻想效標之探索性因素分析...... 129
     附錄十八 正式版本量表之問卷 ......................... 130
     附錄十九 不理性消費傾向與固著式消費量表分數分配圖...... 132
     附錄二十 分二層次概念設計幻想量表的分析.............. 133
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093355018en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 幻想zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 消費幻想zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 量表建製zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 幻想與消費行為:幻想量表之建製zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Fantasy and Consumption Behaviors: Developing the Fantasy Scaleen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中廣新聞網。哈利波特第六集 全球已賣了三億本。奇摩新聞〔網路〕。2005 Oct. 4。2005 Oct. 24引用。取得網址:http://tw.news.yahoo.com/051005/4/2djxj.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李德儀 (2005)。年輕人的幻想與消費幻想之初探與架構建立。國立政治大學企業管系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林重新 (2001)。心理與教育測驗。台北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葛樹人 (1999)。心理測驗學—Psychological Testing and Assessment。台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American Psychological Association (1954), “Technical Recommendations for Psychological Tests and Diagnostic Techniques,” Psychological Bulletin Supplement, 51, 2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anastasi, Anne and Susana Urbina (1997), Psychological Testing , New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 7th Ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Armitt, Lucie (1996), Theorising the Fantastic, New York: St. Martin`s Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Belk, Russell W., Guliz Ger, and Søren Askegaard (2003), “Tthe Fire of Desire: A Multisited Inquiry into Consumer Passion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (December), 326-351.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Belk, Russell W. and Janeen Arnold Costa (1998), “The Mountain Man Myth: A Contemporary Consumption Fantasy,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (December), 218-240.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Campbell, Colin (1987), The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism, London: Blackwell, 83-85.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Campbell, Donald T. and Donald W. Fiske (1959), “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-multimethod Matrix,” Psychological Bulletin, 56 (March), 81-105.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Churchill, Gilbert A. Jr. (1979), “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 64-73.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cronbach, Lee J. (1951), “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,” Psychometrika, 16 (September), 297-334.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cronbach, Lee J. and Paul E. Meehl (1955), “Construct Validity in Psychological Tests,” Psychological Bulletin, 52 (July), 281-302.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Corsini, Raymond J. (1994), Encyclopedia of Psychology, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2nd Ed.., v2, 11-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eysenck, HansJurgen, Wilhelm Arnold, and Richard Meili (1972), Encyclopedia of Psychology, New York: Herder and Herder, 367-369.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fenichel, Otto M. D. (1945), The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis, New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 49-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Heeler, Roger M. and Michael L. Ray (1972), “Measure Validation in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9 (November), 361-370.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holbrook, Morris B. and Elizabeth C. Hirschman (1982), “The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (September), 132-140.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holbrook, Morris B. and Elizabeth C. Hirschman (1982), “Hedonic Consumption Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (Summer), 92-101.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jacoby, Jacob (1978), “Consumer Research: A State of the Art Review,” Journal of Marketing, 42 (April), 87-96.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leach, William (1993), Land of Desire: Merchants, Power, and the Rise of a New American Culture, New York: Random House.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lichtenstein, Donald R., Richard G. Netemeyer and Scot Burton (1990), “Distinguishing Coupon Proneness from Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (July), 54-67.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Long, Mary M. and Leon G. Schiffman (1997), “Swatch Fever: An Allegory for Understanding the Paradox of Collecting,” Psychology & Marketing, 14 (August), 495-509.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Martin, Brett A. S. (2004), “Using the Imagination: Consumer Evoking and Thematizing of the Fantastic Imaginary,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (June), 136-149.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McClelland, David C. (1959), Studies in Motivation, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 63-70.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Murray, Henry A. (1938), “Types of Human Needs,” In McClelland David C. (1959), Studies in Motivation, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 63-70.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Parameswaran Ravi, Barnett A. Greenberg, Danny N. Bellenger, and Dan H. Robertson (1979), “Measuring Reliability: A Comparison of Alternative Techniques,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 18-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peter, Paul J. (1979), “Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices,” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 6-17.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ----------------- (1981), “Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (May), 133-145.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rapaport, David (1951), Organization and Pathology of Thought: Selected Sources, New York and London: Columbia University Press, Bleuler, Eugen (1912), “Das autistische Denken,” Juhrbuch fiir Psychoanalytische and Psychopathologische Forchungen, 4, 1-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ray, Michael L. (1979), “The Critical Need for a Marketing Measurement Tradition: A Proposal,” in O. C. Ferrell, Stephen W. Brown and Charles W. Lamb, Jr. eds. , Conceptual and Theoretical Development in Marketing, 34-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------------------- (1979), “Introduction to the Special Section: Measurement and Marketing Research –Is the Flirtation Going to Lead to A Romance?” Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 1-5zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rook, Dennis W. (1988), “Researching Consumer Fantasy,” in Research in Consumer Behavior, vol. 3, 247-270.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schiffman, Leon G. and Kanuk Leslie Lazar (2004), Consumer Behavior, 8th Ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, 84-115.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Simmel, Georg (1978), The Philosophy of Money, trans. Tom Bottomore and David Frisby (1900), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spearman, Charles (1904), “The Proof and Measurement of the Association between Two Things,” American Journal of Psychology, (January), 72-101.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ----------------------- (1910), “Correlation Calculated from Faulty Data,” British Journal of Psychology, (October), 271-295.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thomas, Nigel J. T. (1999), “Are Theories of Imagery, Theories of Imagination? An Active Perception Approach to Conscious Mental Content,” Cognitive Science, 23 (2), 207-45.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) White, Alan R. (1990), The Language of Imagination, New York: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, (December), 341-352.zh_TW