學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 陽明山國家公園經營管理之研究
The Study of Operation Management of Yangmingshan National Park
貢獻者 孫本初
黃建智
關鍵詞 經營管理政策
解說教育
保育研究
management policies
interpretation programs
research on nature conservation
摘要 本論文旨在研究陽明山國家公園管理處經營管理政策對園區住民之影響情形,主要探討內容有四:園區住民對國家公園經營管理策略及該策略對住民影響情形的評價;不同基本屬性的園區住民對國家公園經營管理策略及該策略對住民影響情形評價之差異性;國家公園經營管理策略與園區住民的相關性;國家公園經營管理策略對園區住民的影響程度等。
     本文採系統隨機抽樣法,以設籍於陽明山國家公園範圍內之現有人口為研究對象,共抽取542份研究樣本,採二階段自行編制問卷為研究工具,資料處理採用描述性統計分析法與推論性統計分析法(卡方檢定、t檢定、單因子變異數分析法、皮爾森相關係數分析法、迴歸分析法等),獲致結果如下:
     一、園區住民對國家公園經營管理之各構面的評價情形由高而低依次為:解說教育、公共建設、保育研究、觀光遊憩、法令執行、土地政策。
     二、園區住民對住民影響之各構面的評價情形由高而低依次為:文化面、生活面、生存面、經濟面。
     三、除性別外,年齡、婚姻狀況、教育程度、職業、居住轄區、居住時間等不同個人基本屬性皆對國家公園經營管理之各構面的評價具差異性。
     四、除性別、年齡、婚姻狀況、居住時間外,教育程度、職業、居住轄區等不同個人基本屬性皆對國家公園經營管理之各構面的評價具差異性。
     五、國家公園經營管理之各構面與住民影響變項的相關性強度順序:
     解說教育>保育研究>土地政策>法令執行>觀光遊憩>建物管理(負相關)
     六、國家公園經營管理之各構面對住民影響變項的解釋程度由高而低依次為:解說教育、保育研究、土地政策、法令執行、建物管理。
     依據結論提出建議重點如下:
     一、應將「解說教育」列為陽明山國家公園管理處最首要推動之業務項目,並加強與園區住民切身權益相關之施政的宣導、溝通與說明。
     二、應將「建物管理」列為陽明山國家公園管理處首要改革之業務項目,將相關業務作業流程公平化、透明化,杜絕人為不法。
     三、應將「保育研究」列為陽明山國家公園管理處重點推動之業務項目,以宏觀保護區理念與生物多樣性觀點,將住民納入整體保育之規劃範疇。
The purpose of this thesis is to study the impact of the Yangmingshan National Park’s management policies on the residents in the national park area. This thesis covers four parts: the residents’ evaluation of the impact of national park management policies, the differences in the evaluation among residents of different demographic features, the relation between the national management policies and residents, and the level of impact of national park management polices on residents.
     This study randomly sampled 542 residents among those who currently registered their households in the national park area. The research method is based on two-stage questionnaire design; and the data processing methods include descriptive statistics and hypothesis analysis (chi-square test, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient analysis, regressions, etc). The results are summarized as follows:
     1. In descending order, residents’ evaluations on various aspects of the management of the national park were: interpretation programs, public facilities, research on nature conservation, legal regulation enforcement, and land policies.
     2. In descending order, residents’ evaluations on the impact of various national park polices on themselves were: culture, daily life, survival and economics.
     3. Residents’ evaluations on national park management policies varied according to different demographic features, such as age, marriage status, education level, occupation, living area and residence time, excluding gender.
     4. Residents’ evaluations on national park management policies varied according to different demographic features, such as education level, occupation and living area, excluding gender, age, marriage status and residence time.
     5. The strength of the association between various aspects of the national park management polices and the impact on residents was (in descending order): interpretation programs > research on nature conservation > land policies > legal regulation enforcement > tourist and leisure activities > building management (negative association).
     6. In descending order, the significance of the various aspects of national park management polices in the impact on residents was: interpretation programs, researches on nature conservation, land policies, legal regulation enforcement and building management.
     Based on the findings, the author makes the following suggestions:
     1. The Yangmingshan National Park Headquarters should consider prioritizing the promotion of “Interpretation Programs” over other businesses and strengthening the communication with local residents about related polices that may affect their rights.
     2. The Yangmingshan National Park Headquarters should put the “Building Management” in top priority for reform and keep the processes of related businesses fair and transparent, as well as avoid any illegal conducts.
     3. “Researches on Nature Conservation” should be one of the key businesses promoted by the Yangmingshan National Park Headquarters. The promotion should be based on the concepts of geology reservation and the rich diversity of wildlife. Residents should be included in the planning process.
參考文獻 一、中文部分
內政部(1972.06.13),國家公園法,61台統(一)義字第878號。
內政部(1998.06.03),內政部警政署組織條例,87總統華總(一)義字第8700110390號。
內政部(1997.05.15),警察法,86華總(一)義字第8600095560號。
內政部(1983.06.02),國家公園法施行細則,72台內營字第16202號。
內政部(2005),陽明山國家公園計畫第二次通盤檢討,台北市:內政部。
內政部警政署(1998.6.17),內政部警政署國家公園警察大隊組織條例,87華總(一)義字第8700121290號。
內政部警政署(1989.08.02)。內政部警政署國家公園警察大隊與各級警察機關權責劃分暨工作聯繫要點。警署人字第75294號。
內政部營建署(1996),營建政策白皮書,台北市:內政部營建署。
內政部營建署(1983.04.27),國家公園管理處組織通則,72台統(一)義字第2297號。
內政部營建署(2002),國家公園史,台北市:內政部營建署。
內政部營建署(2005),東沙國家公園籌備計畫,台北市:內政部營建署。
內政部營建署網站。http://www.cpami.gov.tw
台灣國家公園歷史撰述小組(2000),台灣國家公園大事紀彙編,台北市:內政部營建署。
行政院(2004),國土計畫法草案。
朱子豪(2005),環境資源經營與管理計畫,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所網站。
李光中(2003a),陽明山國家公園共同規劃與管理機制之先驅性研究-以竹子湖地區為例,內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處委託中華民國國家公園學會研究,台北市:內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。
李光中(2003b),談IUCN保護區系統檢討和經營管理成效評估,環境資訊中心網站。
李光中(2004),太魯閣國家公園砂卡礑及大禮大同社區生態旅遊行動計畫之研究,內政部營建署太魯閣國家公園管理處委託研究報告,花蓮縣:內政部營建署太魯閣國家公園管理處。
李明峻(1998),少數民族國際性保護的歷史回顧,民族問題學術研討會,台北市:台灣歷史學會。
李武雄(2001),國家公園範圍內之發展機會與限制,邁入二十一世紀的台灣國家公園造福世代研討會,台北市:內政部營建署、中華民國國家公園學會。
李清泉(2005),矯正機構經營管理之意義及其成功關鍵因素,法務部矯正人員訓練所網站。
林晏州(2005),保護區生態旅遊輔導團服務建議書,台北市:國立台灣大學園藝學系。
林珮瑛(2003),我國司法官訓練制度之研究,台北市:國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
林益仁(2001),原住民部落發展與山林資源保育:從西雅圖酋長的演說談起,保護區管理的國際新趨勢研討會,台北市:內政部營建署、中華民國國家公園學會。
林峰田(1998),陽明山國家公園一般管制區土地使用分區管劃設原則檢討之研究,內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處委託台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所研究,台北市:內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。
吳明隆(2003),SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計,台北市:知城數位科技股份有限公司。
紀駿傑(2001),從觀光原住民到原住民自主觀光,原住民文化與觀光休閒發展研討會論文集,台北市:中華民國戶外遊憩學會。
馬 凱(2003),國家公園建設與部落產業及住民參與之機制,國家公園環境景觀國際研討會論文集,台北市:內政部營建署。
陳錦賜(2001),邁向國家永續發展有效途徑-應用四生環境共生理念於都市環境歸化之研究,第五屆國土規劃論壇研討會論文集,台南市:國立成功大學都市計畫學系,頁5-12。
陳錦賜(2004),陽明山國家公園一般管制區(三)(四)細分區調整原則之擬定與個案評估研究,內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處委託中國文化大學研究,台北市:內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。
陳景堂(2005),統計分析SPSS for Windows 入門與應用,台北市:儒林出版社。
郭瓊瑩(2003),國家公園設施規劃設計規範及案例彙編,內政部營建署委託中華民國景觀學會研究,台北市:內政部營建署。
張 珩(2000),生態建築-人與環境共生共存的理念,土木技術,第三卷第六期,頁124-129。
黄正聰(2005),保護區生態旅遊輔導團服務建議書,台中市:財團法人台灣發展研究所。
曾苗苗(2003),保護區的經營目標及管理面向,環境資訊中心網站。
彭文正(2002),全球產業的趨勢與經營管理的對策,國改研究報告。
楊國樞編著(1993),社會及行為科學研究法,台北市:東華出版社。
葉世文(2001),跨入二十一世紀的國家公園,邁入二十一世紀的台灣國家公園造福世代研討會,台北市:內政部營建署、中華民國國家公園學會。
葉世文(2005),減法策略創新,陽明山國家公園20週年處慶特刊,台北市:內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。
葉俊榮(1999),國家公園法之修訂計畫,內政部營建署委託國家公園學會研究,台北市:內政部營建署。
盧道杰(2001a),保護區管理的新趨勢-西方現代保護區學說之演進與發展回顧,保護區管理的國際新趨勢研討會,台北市:內政部營建署、中華民國國家公園學會。
盧道杰(2001b),參與、共管與自然資源的經營管理,國家公園生物多樣性保育策略研討會論文集,台北市:內政部營建署。
戴寶村(2001),原住民、早住民與新住民,財團法人吳三連台灣史料基金會網站。
Taylor,D.(2003),國家公園設施與遊憩資源整合方式-管理保護區:降低資源方面之衝突,國家公園環境景觀國際研討會,台北市:內政部營建署。
二、英文部分
Arnstein,S. (1969). The ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the Institute of American Planners, 35(4),21-24.
Batisse,M. (1993). Biosphere reserve:an overview. Nature & Resource, 29(1-4),3-5.
Bass,S.,Barry Dalal-Clayton & Jules,P. (1995). Participation in trategies for sustainable development.International Institute for Environment and Development(IIED).
Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1993). Enhancing people’s participation in the tropical forests action programme, FAO, Bangkok.
Borrini-Feyerabend,G. (1996). Collaborative management of protected areas: tailoring the approach to the context. IUCN, Switzerland, p.67.
Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1997). Participation in conservation: why, what, when, how? Beyond fences–seeking social sustainability in conservation. IUCN, Switzerland, p.283.
Bryson,J.& Crosby,B. (1992). Putting people first – sociological variables in rural development. Second Edition. A World Bank Publication, Oxford University Press, USA.
Chambers,R. (1994). Participatory Rural Appraisal(PRA):analysis of experience. World Development,22(9),53-63.
Chambers,R. (1997). Whose reality counts?– Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications, UK.
Elcome,S.& Baines,J. (1999). Steps to success-Working with residents and neighbors to develop and implement plans for protected areas. IUCN, Commission on Education and Communication/European Committee for Environmental Education, Switzerland.
Furze,Brain,Terry De Lacy & Birckhead,J. (1996). Culture, conservation and biodiversity. Wiley, UK.
Hales,D. (1989). Changing concepts of national parks: Conservation for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, UK.
Healey,P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London, Macmillan.
IIED (1994). Whose Eden?-An overview of community approaches to wildlife management.
IUCN (1993). Parks and progress. IUCN, Switzerland.
IUCN/IIED (1994). Strategies for national sustainable development: A handbook for their planning and implementation. London, Earthscan.
IUCN (1994). Guidelines for protected area management categories. Switzerland, IUCN.
IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1980). World conservation strategy, living resource conservation for sustainable development. Gland, IUCN.
IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1991). Caring for the earth: A strategy for sustainable living. London, Earthscan.
Kiss,A. (1990). Living with wildlife - wildlife resource management with local participation in Africa. World Bank technical paper, No.130, African Technical Department series. World Bank, USA.
Lee,K.C. (2001). Towards Collaborative Planning and Management of Natural Protected Areas: A Case Study in the Formosan Landlocked Salmon Wildlife Refuge, Taiwan, Ph.D. Dissertation, London, University College London.
Lewis,C. (1996). Managing conflicts in protected areas.Gland: IUCN.
Litke,S. (1998). National parks: Their origins and development. Brecon Beacons National Park Authority, UK.
Lucas,P.H.C. (1992). Protected landscapes-A guide for policy-makers and planners. IUCN, Chapman & Hall, UK.
McNeely,J.A.(Eds.) (1992). Parks for life – Rreport of the 3th World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas, 10-21 February 1992. IUCN, Switzerland, P.252.
McNeely,J.A. (1993). Parks for life:Report of the 4th World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas. Gland, IUCN.
McNeely,J.A. (1994). Protected areas for the 21st century: working to provide benefits to society. Biodiversity and Conservation, 3(5),390-405.
Miller,K.R. (1996). Balancing the scales: Guidelines for increasing biodiversity’s chances through bioregional management. World Resources Institute,USA.
Murphree,M.W. (1994). The role of institutions in community:Based conservation. Western, David and R. Michael Wright(ed.)Natural connections-perspectives in community-based conservation, Island Press, USA.
Phillips, A. (1999). A whole landscape approach for a holistic century. Policy and priorities for lreland’s landscape-conference papers, Tullamore, Co. Offaly,The Heritage Council, lreland, pp.5-14.
Pimbert,M.P.and Pretty,J.N. (1997). Parks, people and professionals: Putting participation into protected-area management, social change and conservation; environmental politics and impacts of national parks and protected areas. edited by Krishna Ghimire and Michael P. Pimbert. Earthscan, UK.
Price,M.E. (1996). People in biosphere reserves: An evolving concept. Society & Natural Resources, No.9,645-654.
Reen,o., Webleer,T., & Wiedemann,P. (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Environmental discourse. London, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Roe,D.,Mayers,J., Grieg-Gran,M., Kothari,A.,Fabricius,C. and Hughes, R. (2000). Evaluating Eden: Exploring the myths and realities of community-based wildlife management. Evaluating Eden Series No 8, London, IIED.
Tolo Harbour Declaration (2005). IUCN/WCPA EA5
UNCED (1992). Agenda 21. New York, United Nations General Assembly.
WCED (1987). Our common future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Wells,M.P & Brandon,K.E. (1992). The principles and practice of buffer zones and local participation in biodiversity conservation. AMBIO,22(2-3),157-162.
Wright,R.G. and Mattson,D.J. (1996). The origin and purpose of national parks and protected areas. National parks and protected areas-their role in environmental protection, Blackwell Science, USA.
Zazueta,A. (1995). Policy hits the ground: Participation and equity in environmental policy-making. World Resources Institute, USA.
Zube,E.H. (1995). No park is an island: Expanding partnerships in conservation. Washington,Island Press.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
92921058
93
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092921058
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 孫本初zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃建智zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned 14-Sep-2009 12:29:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 14-Sep-2009 12:29:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0092921058en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31897-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 行政管理碩士學程zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92921058zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本論文旨在研究陽明山國家公園管理處經營管理政策對園區住民之影響情形,主要探討內容有四:園區住民對國家公園經營管理策略及該策略對住民影響情形的評價;不同基本屬性的園區住民對國家公園經營管理策略及該策略對住民影響情形評價之差異性;國家公園經營管理策略與園區住民的相關性;國家公園經營管理策略對園區住民的影響程度等。
     本文採系統隨機抽樣法,以設籍於陽明山國家公園範圍內之現有人口為研究對象,共抽取542份研究樣本,採二階段自行編制問卷為研究工具,資料處理採用描述性統計分析法與推論性統計分析法(卡方檢定、t檢定、單因子變異數分析法、皮爾森相關係數分析法、迴歸分析法等),獲致結果如下:
     一、園區住民對國家公園經營管理之各構面的評價情形由高而低依次為:解說教育、公共建設、保育研究、觀光遊憩、法令執行、土地政策。
     二、園區住民對住民影響之各構面的評價情形由高而低依次為:文化面、生活面、生存面、經濟面。
     三、除性別外,年齡、婚姻狀況、教育程度、職業、居住轄區、居住時間等不同個人基本屬性皆對國家公園經營管理之各構面的評價具差異性。
     四、除性別、年齡、婚姻狀況、居住時間外,教育程度、職業、居住轄區等不同個人基本屬性皆對國家公園經營管理之各構面的評價具差異性。
     五、國家公園經營管理之各構面與住民影響變項的相關性強度順序:
     解說教育>保育研究>土地政策>法令執行>觀光遊憩>建物管理(負相關)
     六、國家公園經營管理之各構面對住民影響變項的解釋程度由高而低依次為:解說教育、保育研究、土地政策、法令執行、建物管理。
     依據結論提出建議重點如下:
     一、應將「解說教育」列為陽明山國家公園管理處最首要推動之業務項目,並加強與園區住民切身權益相關之施政的宣導、溝通與說明。
     二、應將「建物管理」列為陽明山國家公園管理處首要改革之業務項目,將相關業務作業流程公平化、透明化,杜絕人為不法。
     三、應將「保育研究」列為陽明山國家公園管理處重點推動之業務項目,以宏觀保護區理念與生物多樣性觀點,將住民納入整體保育之規劃範疇。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this thesis is to study the impact of the Yangmingshan National Park’s management policies on the residents in the national park area. This thesis covers four parts: the residents’ evaluation of the impact of national park management policies, the differences in the evaluation among residents of different demographic features, the relation between the national management policies and residents, and the level of impact of national park management polices on residents.
     This study randomly sampled 542 residents among those who currently registered their households in the national park area. The research method is based on two-stage questionnaire design; and the data processing methods include descriptive statistics and hypothesis analysis (chi-square test, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient analysis, regressions, etc). The results are summarized as follows:
     1. In descending order, residents’ evaluations on various aspects of the management of the national park were: interpretation programs, public facilities, research on nature conservation, legal regulation enforcement, and land policies.
     2. In descending order, residents’ evaluations on the impact of various national park polices on themselves were: culture, daily life, survival and economics.
     3. Residents’ evaluations on national park management policies varied according to different demographic features, such as age, marriage status, education level, occupation, living area and residence time, excluding gender.
     4. Residents’ evaluations on national park management policies varied according to different demographic features, such as education level, occupation and living area, excluding gender, age, marriage status and residence time.
     5. The strength of the association between various aspects of the national park management polices and the impact on residents was (in descending order): interpretation programs > research on nature conservation > land policies > legal regulation enforcement > tourist and leisure activities > building management (negative association).
     6. In descending order, the significance of the various aspects of national park management polices in the impact on residents was: interpretation programs, researches on nature conservation, land policies, legal regulation enforcement and building management.
     Based on the findings, the author makes the following suggestions:
     1. The Yangmingshan National Park Headquarters should consider prioritizing the promotion of “Interpretation Programs” over other businesses and strengthening the communication with local residents about related polices that may affect their rights.
     2. The Yangmingshan National Park Headquarters should put the “Building Management” in top priority for reform and keep the processes of related businesses fair and transparent, as well as avoid any illegal conducts.
     3. “Researches on Nature Conservation” should be one of the key businesses promoted by the Yangmingshan National Park Headquarters. The promotion should be based on the concepts of geology reservation and the rich diversity of wildlife. Residents should be included in the planning process.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論
     第一節 研究動機與目的 1
     第二節 研究途徑與方法 5
     第三節 研究範圍與限制 7
     第四節 研究流程與章節安排 9
     第五節 重要名詞解釋 11
     第二章 文獻探討
     第一節 國際保護區發展之趨勢 16
     第二節 台灣地區國家公園之成立沿革與未來發展趨勢 19
     第三節 陽明山國家公園發展之概況 26
     第四節 國家公園與人類間之衝突 35
     第五節 經營管理之相關理論 38
     第六節 參與之相關理論 47
     第三章 研究設計
     第一節 研究架構與假設 56
     第二節 抽樣設計與研究樣本 59
     第三節 問卷建構 61
     第四節 問卷內容之信度與效度分析 63
     第五節 資料處理與統計分析方法 76
     第四章 研究結果分析
     第一節 樣本代表性分析 81
     第二節 受訪者之基本資料分析 83
     第三節 研究變項之描述性統計分析 86
     第四節 個人基本屬性對國家公園經營管理各構面之差異性分析 98
     第五節 個人基本屬性對住民影響各構面之差異性分析 122
     第六節 國家公園經營管理與住民影響之各構面相關性分析 135
     第七節 國家公園經營管理各構面對住民影響之預測程度 139
     第八節 開放式問卷統計分析 144
     第五章 結論與建議
     第一節 研究發現 147
     第二節 建議 160
     參考書目
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092921058en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 經營管理政策zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 解說教育zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 保育研究zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) management policiesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) interpretation programsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) research on nature conservationen_US
dc.title (題名) 陽明山國家公園經營管理之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Study of Operation Management of Yangmingshan National Parken_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部(1972.06.13),國家公園法,61台統(一)義字第878號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部(1998.06.03),內政部警政署組織條例,87總統華總(一)義字第8700110390號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部(1997.05.15),警察法,86華總(一)義字第8600095560號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部(1983.06.02),國家公園法施行細則,72台內營字第16202號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部(2005),陽明山國家公園計畫第二次通盤檢討,台北市:內政部。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部警政署(1998.6.17),內政部警政署國家公園警察大隊組織條例,87華總(一)義字第8700121290號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部警政署(1989.08.02)。內政部警政署國家公園警察大隊與各級警察機關權責劃分暨工作聯繫要點。警署人字第75294號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部營建署(1996),營建政策白皮書,台北市:內政部營建署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部營建署(1983.04.27),國家公園管理處組織通則,72台統(一)義字第2297號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部營建署(2002),國家公園史,台北市:內政部營建署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部營建署(2005),東沙國家公園籌備計畫,台北市:內政部營建署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 內政部營建署網站。http://www.cpami.gov.twzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台灣國家公園歷史撰述小組(2000),台灣國家公園大事紀彙編,台北市:內政部營建署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院(2004),國土計畫法草案。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 朱子豪(2005),環境資源經營與管理計畫,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所網站。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李光中(2003a),陽明山國家公園共同規劃與管理機制之先驅性研究-以竹子湖地區為例,內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處委託中華民國國家公園學會研究,台北市:內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李光中(2003b),談IUCN保護區系統檢討和經營管理成效評估,環境資訊中心網站。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李光中(2004),太魯閣國家公園砂卡礑及大禮大同社區生態旅遊行動計畫之研究,內政部營建署太魯閣國家公園管理處委託研究報告,花蓮縣:內政部營建署太魯閣國家公園管理處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李明峻(1998),少數民族國際性保護的歷史回顧,民族問題學術研討會,台北市:台灣歷史學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李武雄(2001),國家公園範圍內之發展機會與限制,邁入二十一世紀的台灣國家公園造福世代研討會,台北市:內政部營建署、中華民國國家公園學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李清泉(2005),矯正機構經營管理之意義及其成功關鍵因素,法務部矯正人員訓練所網站。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林晏州(2005),保護區生態旅遊輔導團服務建議書,台北市:國立台灣大學園藝學系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林珮瑛(2003),我國司法官訓練制度之研究,台北市:國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林益仁(2001),原住民部落發展與山林資源保育:從西雅圖酋長的演說談起,保護區管理的國際新趨勢研討會,台北市:內政部營建署、中華民國國家公園學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林峰田(1998),陽明山國家公園一般管制區土地使用分區管劃設原則檢討之研究,內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處委託台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所研究,台北市:內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳明隆(2003),SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計,台北市:知城數位科技股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 紀駿傑(2001),從觀光原住民到原住民自主觀光,原住民文化與觀光休閒發展研討會論文集,台北市:中華民國戶外遊憩學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬 凱(2003),國家公園建設與部落產業及住民參與之機制,國家公園環境景觀國際研討會論文集,台北市:內政部營建署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳錦賜(2001),邁向國家永續發展有效途徑-應用四生環境共生理念於都市環境歸化之研究,第五屆國土規劃論壇研討會論文集,台南市:國立成功大學都市計畫學系,頁5-12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳錦賜(2004),陽明山國家公園一般管制區(三)(四)細分區調整原則之擬定與個案評估研究,內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處委託中國文化大學研究,台北市:內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳景堂(2005),統計分析SPSS for Windows 入門與應用,台北市:儒林出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭瓊瑩(2003),國家公園設施規劃設計規範及案例彙編,內政部營建署委託中華民國景觀學會研究,台北市:內政部營建署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張 珩(2000),生態建築-人與環境共生共存的理念,土木技術,第三卷第六期,頁124-129。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黄正聰(2005),保護區生態旅遊輔導團服務建議書,台中市:財團法人台灣發展研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曾苗苗(2003),保護區的經營目標及管理面向,環境資訊中心網站。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 彭文正(2002),全球產業的趨勢與經營管理的對策,國改研究報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊國樞編著(1993),社會及行為科學研究法,台北市:東華出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉世文(2001),跨入二十一世紀的國家公園,邁入二十一世紀的台灣國家公園造福世代研討會,台北市:內政部營建署、中華民國國家公園學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉世文(2005),減法策略創新,陽明山國家公園20週年處慶特刊,台北市:內政部營建署陽明山國家公園管理處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉俊榮(1999),國家公園法之修訂計畫,內政部營建署委託國家公園學會研究,台北市:內政部營建署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 盧道杰(2001a),保護區管理的新趨勢-西方現代保護區學說之演進與發展回顧,保護區管理的國際新趨勢研討會,台北市:內政部營建署、中華民國國家公園學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 盧道杰(2001b),參與、共管與自然資源的經營管理,國家公園生物多樣性保育策略研討會論文集,台北市:內政部營建署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 戴寶村(2001),原住民、早住民與新住民,財團法人吳三連台灣史料基金會網站。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor,D.(2003),國家公園設施與遊憩資源整合方式-管理保護區:降低資源方面之衝突,國家公園環境景觀國際研討會,台北市:內政部營建署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arnstein,S. (1969). The ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the Institute of American Planners, 35(4),21-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Batisse,M. (1993). Biosphere reserve:an overview. Nature & Resource, 29(1-4),3-5.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bass,S.,Barry Dalal-Clayton & Jules,P. (1995). Participation in trategies for sustainable development.International Institute for Environment and Development(IIED).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1993). Enhancing people’s participation in the tropical forests action programme, FAO, Bangkok.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Borrini-Feyerabend,G. (1996). Collaborative management of protected areas: tailoring the approach to the context. IUCN, Switzerland, p.67.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1997). Participation in conservation: why, what, when, how? Beyond fences–seeking social sustainability in conservation. IUCN, Switzerland, p.283.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bryson,J.& Crosby,B. (1992). Putting people first – sociological variables in rural development. Second Edition. A World Bank Publication, Oxford University Press, USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chambers,R. (1994). Participatory Rural Appraisal(PRA):analysis of experience. World Development,22(9),53-63.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chambers,R. (1997). Whose reality counts?– Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications, UK.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Elcome,S.& Baines,J. (1999). Steps to success-Working with residents and neighbors to develop and implement plans for protected areas. IUCN, Commission on Education and Communication/European Committee for Environmental Education, Switzerland.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Furze,Brain,Terry De Lacy & Birckhead,J. (1996). Culture, conservation and biodiversity. Wiley, UK.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hales,D. (1989). Changing concepts of national parks: Conservation for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, UK.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Healey,P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London, Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) IIED (1994). Whose Eden?-An overview of community approaches to wildlife management.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) IUCN (1993). Parks and progress. IUCN, Switzerland.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) IUCN/IIED (1994). Strategies for national sustainable development: A handbook for their planning and implementation. London, Earthscan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) IUCN (1994). Guidelines for protected area management categories. Switzerland, IUCN.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1980). World conservation strategy, living resource conservation for sustainable development. Gland, IUCN.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1991). Caring for the earth: A strategy for sustainable living. London, Earthscan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kiss,A. (1990). Living with wildlife - wildlife resource management with local participation in Africa. World Bank technical paper, No.130, African Technical Department series. World Bank, USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lee,K.C. (2001). Towards Collaborative Planning and Management of Natural Protected Areas: A Case Study in the Formosan Landlocked Salmon Wildlife Refuge, Taiwan, Ph.D. Dissertation, London, University College London.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lewis,C. (1996). Managing conflicts in protected areas.Gland: IUCN.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Litke,S. (1998). National parks: Their origins and development. Brecon Beacons National Park Authority, UK.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lucas,P.H.C. (1992). Protected landscapes-A guide for policy-makers and planners. IUCN, Chapman & Hall, UK.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McNeely,J.A.(Eds.) (1992). Parks for life – Rreport of the 3th World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas, 10-21 February 1992. IUCN, Switzerland, P.252.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McNeely,J.A. (1993). Parks for life:Report of the 4th World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas. Gland, IUCN.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McNeely,J.A. (1994). Protected areas for the 21st century: working to provide benefits to society. Biodiversity and Conservation, 3(5),390-405.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Miller,K.R. (1996). Balancing the scales: Guidelines for increasing biodiversity’s chances through bioregional management. World Resources Institute,USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Murphree,M.W. (1994). The role of institutions in community:Based conservation. Western, David and R. Michael Wright(ed.)Natural connections-perspectives in community-based conservation, Island Press, USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Phillips, A. (1999). A whole landscape approach for a holistic century. Policy and priorities for lreland’s landscape-conference papers, Tullamore, Co. Offaly,The Heritage Council, lreland, pp.5-14.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pimbert,M.P.and Pretty,J.N. (1997). Parks, people and professionals: Putting participation into protected-area management, social change and conservation; environmental politics and impacts of national parks and protected areas. edited by Krishna Ghimire and Michael P. Pimbert. Earthscan, UK.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Price,M.E. (1996). People in biosphere reserves: An evolving concept. Society & Natural Resources, No.9,645-654.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reen,o., Webleer,T., & Wiedemann,P. (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Environmental discourse. London, Kluwer Academic Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Roe,D.,Mayers,J., Grieg-Gran,M., Kothari,A.,Fabricius,C. and Hughes, R. (2000). Evaluating Eden: Exploring the myths and realities of community-based wildlife management. Evaluating Eden Series No 8, London, IIED.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tolo Harbour Declaration (2005). IUCN/WCPA EA5zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) UNCED (1992). Agenda 21. New York, United Nations General Assembly.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) WCED (1987). Our common future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford, Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wells,M.P & Brandon,K.E. (1992). The principles and practice of buffer zones and local participation in biodiversity conservation. AMBIO,22(2-3),157-162.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wright,R.G. and Mattson,D.J. (1996). The origin and purpose of national parks and protected areas. National parks and protected areas-their role in environmental protection, Blackwell Science, USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zazueta,A. (1995). Policy hits the ground: Participation and equity in environmental policy-making. World Resources Institute, USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zube,E.H. (1995). No park is an island: Expanding partnerships in conservation. Washington,Island Press.zh_TW