1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 尼采的教育藝術
Nietzsche`s Art of Education
作者 李克寰
Keh-Hwan Li
貢獻者 蔡錚雲
李克寰
Keh-Hwan Li
關鍵詞 尼采
教育
藝術
現代性
後現代
Nietzsche
Education
Art
Modernity
Postmodern
日期 2003
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 14:53:42 (UTC+8)
摘要 教育活動的藝術屬性深深由尼采哲學所重新揭示，在此之前，體現該觀點的是古希臘人，於其生活中，感性與理性、個體與群體以及人與大自然係彼此協調，美乃遍佈各項舉措；到了文藝復興，注重身心和諧及全人發展之人文主義再度開顯教育與藝術的親緣關係，同時影響許多教育家立論。秉承古希臘和文藝復興精神，尼采認為徒恃理性、講求規制化的啟蒙教育實為該藝術之淪喪，因這種教育雖滿足充分控約事物的需要，也造成人性失衡與分裂。有鑑於此，根植情感並著重突破法則之藝術性教育頓成其鮮明立場。第二章（教育的誕生）一開始即陳述尼采對現代教育的不滿處，例如高抬知識卻戕害本能，使人產生理性╱感性分裂等等；歸結出尼采『將現代人從現代性的詛咒中釋放出來』，以期恢復人的力與美主張後，接著介紹他從希臘文化發現之兩股動力——代表大自然創生本能的酒神及代表節制、均衡之德的日神；追求有力本能的美之表達，或者說酒神與日神共同形成的意志，便是教育參贊大自然造化之功的藝術性格顯露。而人和文化所擁有之品味、風格，乃美在教育上的具體展現。由於良好教師為施展教育藝術之首要條件，第三章（作為文化建樹者的教育家）遂探討教師角色，於尼采眼裡，教師既是人的形塑者，亦為文化的引領者，人需要偉大教師——教育家，才能展現力與美、達成文化使命。教育家之鮮明標誌，莫過飽含動能的藝術靈魂，他有雙轉化事物的纖巧細手，是自身力量豐盈的創造者和施與者；生命和存在於其藝術地思考下成為美的圖畫，並替人類未來揭示遠景；他更深明愛的藝術，從提高人類素質中使世間獲得救贖。教育家還擅長經營師生關係，將其提昇為指揮藝術、溝通藝術和贈與藝術。但從事藝術創造，瞭解材質誠屬重要，故第四章（人性、極其的人性）論述教育活動據以奠基的人性，有關人性為何的問題，『理性主體』可謂啟蒙運動之最佳宣言，此般人性看待方式除用思維界定自我、強調穩定的自我同一性外，壓抑欲望情感又為其特徵。尼采則返回自然，改賦熱情、欲望予生命原動力的首要位階，聲言人性是各種欲力充斥流動的生命形態，教育須適切引導諸多本能，凝聚成強大的『求力意志』，這股意志也是追求創造的力量，寓存身體，人之身體遂極富藝術性，不斷創新文化價值；出自身體，人的藝術性，尚由『精神三變』所鋪陳。審視人性後，第五章（超人如是說）處理欲對其改造之教育目的，人會變成何種模樣涉及多項複雜因素，有些似乎可做抉擇，有些似乎無法抗拒，設立目標凸顯人不甘受命運擺佈，希冀無盡可能地自我創造。『超人』理想的提出，誠屬尼采此番作為；尤有甚者，他更依力的強弱多寡區分人之類型，與超人美好型態構成強烈對照的為『末流之人』，『酒神人格』與『基督教人格』係另一劃分方式。是否願意迎接橫逆、承擔痛苦，乃測度力量強弱之試金石。至於自我和他人的交往，尼采仍考量力之升降藝術性地措置。擁有理想尚不充分，須提供達成之實質條件，所以第六章（文教的價值內涵）討論蘊含價值的教育內容，尼采認為，能促進力之增長、給生命帶來蓬勃朝氣即價值和美之所在，倘若踐踏人性，文教內涵便頓失意義。各項教育□，培養健全情感是他的首要訴求，倡導力量豐盈且賦予事物光輝形式之狂醉情態。談到知識，主張語文、歷史、哲學的傳授不可離開生活經驗，如此方可得享真正悅樂。關於倫理教育，他疾呼釋放非善非惡又可善可惡的自然本能，進而發展個性和自我立法。針對充滿痛苦的人生，尼采從希臘悲劇汲取智慧，以『永恆復歸』之壯闊情態超克悲苦。除了實質內涵，履行方法亦不可或缺，第七章（創造價值的文教策略）乃探究有助價值創造的策略，相較側重思辯之辯證法，尼采運用的教育策略格外具藝術氣息，包括學習如何看、聽、感受周遭環境，體會事物多面性，形成裨益生命的『視角』。妥為承襲、增生、調節能量，並減少消耗，使身體有限能量在紀律整飭下發揮最大效益。追溯價值概念的產生、流傳和演變，從揭露該過程介入之意義轉變力量替未來繪製新顏。採取距離，用懷疑、批判的態度瓦解價值立說基礎，求能獲得解放，敲響文化先聲。視提昇生命與否，更改既定價值間之排列順序，或者自為立法，創建嶄新價值。第八章（教育機制的未來）申論結合教師、學生、目的、內涵、策略各項目之教育制度，學校為文化之播種處，欲結成文化碩果，應謹慎篩選學生、施加必要規範，好孕育文化菁英；教師和學生間存在著『精神階級』，彼此講求主從次序。紀律嚴明、井然有序的學校，才是尼采心儀之美的機制。不僅如此，社會的和諧運作有賴按人格、智慧、才能劃分的『等級秩序』，高低等級間的『命令—服從』關係與各本能配合凝聚之『藝術身體』原則一貫。但本能更常相互競逐，透過人我競逐兼顧個人提昇及群體利益，便為促進文化之良美政體。
這個研究試圖藉尼采思想闡釋超乎科學駕馭範圍、介於可言說與不可言說的教育本質——藝術，其有別於審美教育或特就教育中之美學要素所做的論述，因後兩者僅將藝術當成教育之一部分來看待。
參考文獻 1. Abbey, R. (2000). Nietzsche’s Middle Period. New York: Oxford University.
2. Ahern, D. R. (1995). Nietzsche as Cultural Physician. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University.
3. Allison, D. B. (Ed.). (1985). The New Nietzsche: Contemporary Styles of Interpretation. Cambridge: The MIT.
4. Aloni, N. (1991). Beyond Nihilism: Nietzsche’s Healing and Edifying Philosophy. Lanham: University Press of America.
5. Ansell-Pearson, K. (1991). Nietzsche contra Rousseau: A Study of Nietzsche’s Moral and Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
6. Ansell-Pearson, K. (Ed.). (1991). Nietzsche and Modern German Thought. London: Routledge.
7. Aristotle, (1995). The Politics. (E. Barker, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University.
8. Bataille, G. (1994). On Nietzsche. (B. Boone, Trans.). New York: Paragon House.
9. Bates, C. (1999). Play in a Godless World: The Theory and Practice of Play in Shakespeare, Nietzsche and Freud. London: Open Gate.
10. Bauman, Z. (1989). Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-modernity and Intellectuals. Cambridge: Polity.
11. Behler, E. (1991). Confrontations:Derrida/Heidegger/Nietzsche. (S. Taubeneck, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University.
12. Beistegui, M. & Sparks, S. (Eds.). (2000). Philosophy and Tragedy. London: Routledge.
13. Blondel, E. (1991). Nietzsche: The Body and Culture. (S. Hand, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University.
14. Brubacher, J. S. (1966). A History of the Problems of Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Bullock, A. (1985). The Humanist Tradition in the West. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
16. Cahoone, L. E. (1995). The Ends of Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York.
17. Cameron, F. (2002). Nietzsche and the Problem of Morality. New York: Peter Lang.
18. Clark, M. (1990). Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University.
19. Conway, D. W. & Groff, P. S. (Eds.). (1998). Nietzsche: Critical Assessments. (Vols. 1-4). London: Routledge.
20. Copper, D. E. (1983). Authenticity and Learning: Nietzsche’s Educational Philosophy. London: Routledge.
21. Deleuze, G. (1983). Nietzsche and Philosophy. (H. Tomlinson, Trans.). New York: Columbia University.
22. Derrida, J. (1979). Spurs: Nietzsche’s Styles. (B. Harlow, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.
23. Dudley, W. (2002). Hegel, Nietzsche, and Philosophy: Thinking Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
24. Ferry, L., & Renaut, A. (Eds.). (1997). Why We Are Not Nietzscheans. (R. D. Loaiza, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.
25. Fraser, G. (2002). Redeeming Nietzsche: On the Piety of Unbelief. London: Routledge.
26. Geuss, R. (1999). Morality, Culture, and History: Essay on German Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
27. Gilman, S. L., Blair, C., & Parent, D. J. (Eds.). (1989). Friedrich Nietzsche on Rhetoric and Language. (S. L. Gilman, C. Blair, & D. J. Parent, Trans.). New York: Oxford University.
28. Gooding-Williams, R. (2001). Zarathustra’s Dionysian Modernism. Stanford: Stanford University.
29. Green, M. S. (2002). Nietzsche and the Transcendental Tradition. Urbana: University of Illinois.
30. Haar, M. (1996). Nietzsche and Metaphysics. (M. Gendre, Trans. & Ed.). Albany: State University of New York.
31. Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. (F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge: The MIT.
32. Hales, S. D. & Welshon, R. (2000). Nietzsche’s Perspectivism. Urbana: University of Illinois.
33. Harrison, P. R. (1994). The Disenchantment of Reason: The Problem of Socrates in Modernity. Albany: State University of New York.
34. Heidegger, M. (1979). Nietzsche. (D. F. Krell, Trans.). (Vols. 1-4). San Francisco: Harper & Row.
35. Heilke, T. (1998). Nietzsche’s Tragic Regime: Culture, Aesthetics, and Political Education. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University.
36. Heller, E. (1988). The Importance of Nietzsche: Ten Essays. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
37. Highet, G. (1950). The Art of Teaching. New York: Vintage.
38. Houlgate, S. (1986). Hegel, Nietzsche and the Criticism of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
39. Hunt, L. H. (1993). Nietzsche and the Origin of Virtue. London: Routledge.
40. Jaeger, W. (1986). Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture. (G. Highet, Trans.). (Vols. 1-3). New York: Oxford University.
41. Janaway, C. (Ed.). (1998). Willing and Nothingness: Schopenhauer as Nietzsche’s Educator. Oxford: Oxford University.
42. Jaspers, K. (1969). Nietzsche: An Introduction to the Understanding of His Philosophical Activities. (C. F. Wallreff, & F. J. Schmitz, Trans.). Chicago: Gateway.
43. Jurist, E. L. (2000). Beyond Hegel and Nietzsche: Philosophy, Culture, and Agency. Cambridge: The MIT.
44. Kant, I. (1952). The Critique of Judgment. (J. C. Meredith, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University.
45. Kaufmann, W. (1978). Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. Princeton: Princeton University.
46. Kemal, S., Gaskell, I. & Conway, D. W. (Eds.). (1998). Nietzsche, Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
47. Klossowski, P. (1997). Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle. (D. W. Smith, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.
48. Koelb, C. (Ed.). (1990). Nietzsche as Postmodernist: Essays Pro and Contra. Albany: State University of New York.
49. Krell, D. F. & Wood, D. (Eds.). (1988). Exceedingly Nietzsche: Aspects of Contemporary Nietzsche-Interpretation. London: Routledge.
50. Lampert, L. (1986). Nietzsche’s Teaching: An Interpretation of Thus Spoke Zarathustra. New Haven: Yale University.
51. Leiter, B. (2002). Nietzsche on Morality. London: Routledge.
52. Lemco, G. (1992). Nietzsche as Educator. San Francisco: Mellen Research University.
53. Levine, P. (1995). Nietzsche and the Modern Crisis of the Humanities. Albany: State University of New York.
54. Lippitt, J. (Ed.). (1999). Nietzsche’s Future. Hampshire: Macmillan.
55. Lippitt, J. & Urpeth, J. (Eds.). (2000). Nietzsche and the Divine. Manchester: Clinamen.
56. Lomax, J. H. (2003). The Paradox of Philosophical Education: Nietzsche’s New Nobility and the Eternal Recurrence in Beyond Good and Evil. Lanham: Lexington.
57. Löwith, K. (1997). Nietzsche’s Philosophy of the Eternal Recurrence of the Same. (J. H. Lomax, Trans.). Berkley: University of California.
58. Magnus, B. & Higgins, K. M. (Eds.). (1996). The Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
59. May, S. (1999). Nietzsche’s Ethics and his War on Morality. Oxford: Oxford University.
60. McClelland, J. S. (1996). A History of Western Political Thought. London: Routledge.
61. Megill, A. (1985). Prophets of Extremity: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault, Derrida. Berkeley: University of California.
62. Meynell, H. A. (1999). Postmodernism and the New Enlightenment. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America.
63. Montinari, M. (2003). Reading Nietzsche. (G. Whitlock, Trans.). Urbana: University of Illinois.
64. Moore, G. (2002). Nietzsche, Biology and Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
65. Mullen, D. C. (1999). Beyond Subjectivity and Representation: Perception, Expression, and Creation in Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. Lanham: University Press of America.
66. Müller-Lauter, W. (1999). Nietzsche: His Philosophy of Contradictions and the Contradictions of His Philosophy. (D. J. Parent, Trans.). Urbana: University of Illinois.
67. Murphy, T. F. (1984). Nietzsche as Educator. Lanham: University Press of America.
68. Nauert, C. G. (1995). Humanism and the Culture of Renaissance Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
69. Nehamas, A. (1985). Nietzsche: Life as Literature. Cambridge: Harvard University.
70. Owen, D. (1994). Maturity and Modernity: Nietzsche, Weber, Foucault and the Ambivalence of Reason. London: Routledge.
71. Owen, D. (1995). Nietzsche, Politics and Modernity: A Critique of Liberal Reason. London: Sage.
72. Peters, M., Marshall, J. & Smeyers, P. (Eds.). (2001). Nietzsche’s Legacy for Education. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.
73. Pippin, R. B. (1991). Modernism as a Philosophical Problem: On the Dissatisfactions of European High Culture. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
74. Plato, (1998). Republic. (R. Waterfield, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University.
75. Porter, J. I. (2000). The Invention of Dionysus: An Essay on The Birth of Tragedy. Stanford: Stanford University.
76. Rabinow, P. (Ed.). (1984). The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon.
77. Rampley, M. (2000). Nietzsche, Aesthetics and Modernity. New York: Cambridge University.
78. Renaut, A. (1997). The Era of the Individual: A Contribution to a History of Subjectivity. (M. B. DeBevoise, & F. Philip, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University.
79. Richardson, J. (1996). Nietzsche’s System. New York: Oxford University.
80. Ridley, A. (1998). Nietzsche’s Conscience: Six Character Studies from the Genealogy. Ithaca: Cornell University.
81. Rosen, S. (1995). The Mask of Enlightenment: Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. New York: Cambridge University.
82. Santaniello, W. (Ed.). (2001). Nietzsche and the Gods. Albany: State University of New York.
83. Schacht, R. (Ed.). (1994). Nietzsche, Genealogy, Morality: Essays on Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals. Berkeley: University of California.
84. Schacht, R. (1995). Making Sense of Nietzsche: Reflections Timely and Untimely. Urbana: University of Illinois.
85. Schacht, R. (Ed.). (2001). Nietzsche’s Postmoralism: Essays on Nietzsche’s Prelude to Philosophy’s Future. New York: Cambridge University.
86. Schiller, F. (1985). On the Aesthetic Education of Man. (E. M. Wilkinson, & L. A. Willoughby, Eds. & Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University.
87. Schrag, C. O. (1997). The Self after Postmodernity. New Haven: Yale University.
88. Schrift, A. D. (1990). Nietzsche and the Question of Interpretation: Between Hermeneutics and Deconstruction. New York: Routledge.
89. Schrift, A. D. (Ed.). (1997). The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethics of Generosity. New York: Routledge.
90. Schrift, A. D. (Ed.). (2000). Why Nietzsche Still? : Reflections on Drama, Culture, and Politics. Berkeley: University of California.
91. Sedgwick, P. R. (Ed.). (1995). Nietzsche: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
92. Silverman, H. J. (Ed.). (2000). Philosophy and Desire. New York: Routledge.
93. Sleinis, E. E. (1994). Nietzsche’s Revaluation of Values: A Study in Strategies. Urbana: University of Illinois.
94. Smith, J. H. (2000). Dialectics of the Will: Freedom, Power, and Understanding in Modern French and German Thought. Detroit: Wayne State University.
95. Solomon, R. C. (Ed.). (1980). Nietzsche: A Collection of Critical Essays. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.
96. Solomon, R. C. (1993). The Passion: Emotions and the Meaning of Life. Indianapolis: Hackett.
97. Spinks, L. (2003). Friedrich Nietzsche. London: Routledge.
98. Steiner, R. (1995). The Spirit of the Waldorf School. (R. F. Lathe, & N. P. Whittaker, Trans.). Hudson: Anthroposophic.
99. Steiner, R. (1996). Waldorf Education and Anthroposophy 2. (N. P. Whittaker, & R. F. Lathe, & R. Everett, Trans.). Hudson: Anthroposophic.
100. Steinhart, E. (2000). On Nietzsche. Belmont: Wadsworth.
101. Strong, T. B. (1988). Friedrich Nietzsche and the Politics of Transfiguration. Berkeley: University of California.
102. Taylor, C. (1975). Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
103. Thiele, L. P. (1990). Friedrich Nietzsche and the Politics of the Soul: A Study of Heroic Individualism. Princeton: Princeton University.
104. Thomas, K. (Ed.). (1997). German Philosophers: Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University.
105. Tongeren, P. J. M. v. (2000). Reinterpreting Modern Culture: An Introduction to Friedrich Nietzsche’s Philosophy. West Lafayette: Purdue University.
106. Vattimo, G. (1993). The Adventure of Difference: Philosophy after Nietzsche and Heidegger. (C. Blamires, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity.
107. Vattimo, G. (2001). Nietzsche: An Introduction. (N. Martin, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University.
108. Villa, D. (2001). Socratic Citizenship. Princeton: Princeton University.
109. White, R. J. (1997). Nietzsche and the Problem of Sovereignty. Urbana: University of Illinois.
110. White, R. J. (Ed.). (2002). Nietzsche. Aldershot: Ashgate.
111. Williams, L. L. (2001). Nietzsche’s Mirror: The World as Will to Power. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
112. Winchester, J. J. (1994). Nietzsche’s Aesthetic Turn: Reading Nietzsche after Heidegger, Deleuze, and Derrida. Albany: State University of New York.
113. Young, J. (1992). Nietzsche’s Philosophy of Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
114. Zuckert, C. H. (1996). Postmodern Platos: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Gadamer, Strauss, Derrida. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
描述 博士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
88152502
92
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088152502
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蔡錚雲zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 李克寰zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Keh-Hwan Lien_US
dc.creator (作者) 李克寰zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Keh-Hwan Lien_US
dc.date (日期) 2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 14:53:42 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 14:53:42 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 14:53:42 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0088152502en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32933-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 88152502zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 教育活動的藝術屬性深深由尼采哲學所重新揭示，在此之前，體現該觀點的是古希臘人，於其生活中，感性與理性、個體與群體以及人與大自然係彼此協調，美乃遍佈各項舉措；到了文藝復興，注重身心和諧及全人發展之人文主義再度開顯教育與藝術的親緣關係，同時影響許多教育家立論。秉承古希臘和文藝復興精神，尼采認為徒恃理性、講求規制化的啟蒙教育實為該藝術之淪喪，因這種教育雖滿足充分控約事物的需要，也造成人性失衡與分裂。有鑑於此，根植情感並著重突破法則之藝術性教育頓成其鮮明立場。第二章（教育的誕生）一開始即陳述尼采對現代教育的不滿處，例如高抬知識卻戕害本能，使人產生理性╱感性分裂等等；歸結出尼采『將現代人從現代性的詛咒中釋放出來』，以期恢復人的力與美主張後，接著介紹他從希臘文化發現之兩股動力——代表大自然創生本能的酒神及代表節制、均衡之德的日神；追求有力本能的美之表達，或者說酒神與日神共同形成的意志，便是教育參贊大自然造化之功的藝術性格顯露。而人和文化所擁有之品味、風格，乃美在教育上的具體展現。由於良好教師為施展教育藝術之首要條件，第三章（作為文化建樹者的教育家）遂探討教師角色，於尼采眼裡，教師既是人的形塑者，亦為文化的引領者，人需要偉大教師——教育家，才能展現力與美、達成文化使命。教育家之鮮明標誌，莫過飽含動能的藝術靈魂，他有雙轉化事物的纖巧細手，是自身力量豐盈的創造者和施與者；生命和存在於其藝術地思考下成為美的圖畫，並替人類未來揭示遠景；他更深明愛的藝術，從提高人類素質中使世間獲得救贖。教育家還擅長經營師生關係，將其提昇為指揮藝術、溝通藝術和贈與藝術。但從事藝術創造，瞭解材質誠屬重要，故第四章（人性、極其的人性）論述教育活動據以奠基的人性，有關人性為何的問題，『理性主體』可謂啟蒙運動之最佳宣言，此般人性看待方式除用思維界定自我、強調穩定的自我同一性外，壓抑欲望情感又為其特徵。尼采則返回自然，改賦熱情、欲望予生命原動力的首要位階，聲言人性是各種欲力充斥流動的生命形態，教育須適切引導諸多本能，凝聚成強大的『求力意志』，這股意志也是追求創造的力量，寓存身體，人之身體遂極富藝術性，不斷創新文化價值；出自身體，人的藝術性，尚由『精神三變』所鋪陳。審視人性後，第五章（超人如是說）處理欲對其改造之教育目的，人會變成何種模樣涉及多項複雜因素，有些似乎可做抉擇，有些似乎無法抗拒，設立目標凸顯人不甘受命運擺佈，希冀無盡可能地自我創造。『超人』理想的提出，誠屬尼采此番作為；尤有甚者，他更依力的強弱多寡區分人之類型，與超人美好型態構成強烈對照的為『末流之人』，『酒神人格』與『基督教人格』係另一劃分方式。是否願意迎接橫逆、承擔痛苦，乃測度力量強弱之試金石。至於自我和他人的交往，尼采仍考量力之升降藝術性地措置。擁有理想尚不充分，須提供達成之實質條件，所以第六章（文教的價值內涵）討論蘊含價值的教育內容，尼采認為，能促進力之增長、給生命帶來蓬勃朝氣即價值和美之所在，倘若踐踏人性，文教內涵便頓失意義。各項教育□，培養健全情感是他的首要訴求，倡導力量豐盈且賦予事物光輝形式之狂醉情態。談到知識，主張語文、歷史、哲學的傳授不可離開生活經驗，如此方可得享真正悅樂。關於倫理教育，他疾呼釋放非善非惡又可善可惡的自然本能，進而發展個性和自我立法。針對充滿痛苦的人生，尼采從希臘悲劇汲取智慧，以『永恆復歸』之壯闊情態超克悲苦。除了實質內涵，履行方法亦不可或缺，第七章（創造價值的文教策略）乃探究有助價值創造的策略，相較側重思辯之辯證法，尼采運用的教育策略格外具藝術氣息，包括學習如何看、聽、感受周遭環境，體會事物多面性，形成裨益生命的『視角』。妥為承襲、增生、調節能量，並減少消耗，使身體有限能量在紀律整飭下發揮最大效益。追溯價值概念的產生、流傳和演變，從揭露該過程介入之意義轉變力量替未來繪製新顏。採取距離，用懷疑、批判的態度瓦解價值立說基礎，求能獲得解放，敲響文化先聲。視提昇生命與否，更改既定價值間之排列順序，或者自為立法，創建嶄新價值。第八章（教育機制的未來）申論結合教師、學生、目的、內涵、策略各項目之教育制度，學校為文化之播種處，欲結成文化碩果，應謹慎篩選學生、施加必要規範，好孕育文化菁英；教師和學生間存在著『精神階級』，彼此講求主從次序。紀律嚴明、井然有序的學校，才是尼采心儀之美的機制。不僅如此，社會的和諧運作有賴按人格、智慧、才能劃分的『等級秩序』，高低等級間的『命令—服從』關係與各本能配合凝聚之『藝術身體』原則一貫。但本能更常相互競逐，透過人我競逐兼顧個人提昇及群體利益，便為促進文化之良美政體。
這個研究試圖藉尼采思想闡釋超乎科學駕馭範圍、介於可言說與不可言說的教育本質——藝術，其有別於審美教育或特就教育中之美學要素所做的論述，因後兩者僅將藝術當成教育之一部分來看待。		zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
（一）研究緣起 1
（二）研究旨趣 2
（三）文獻回顧 3
（四）研究取材 7
（五）研究態度 9
（六）研究述要 10
第二章 教育的誕生 13
（一）教育與文化 13
（二）力與美 16
（三）品味與風格 19
第三章 作為文化建樹者的教育家 23
（一）教師重要性 23
（二）教育家特質 26
（三）師生關係 29
第四章 人性、極其的人性 32
（一）欲力之流 32
（二）藝術身體 36
（三）精神三變 40
第五章 『超人』如是說 44
（一）宿命乎？自由乎？ 44
（二）人之類型 48
（三）孤寂乎？偕朋乎？ 54
第六章 文教的價值內涵 57
（一）狂醉奔放之情感教育 57
（二）饗以悅樂之知識教育 60
（三）超乎善惡之倫理教育 64
（四）悲壯奮起之人生教育 67
第七章 創造價值的文教策略 71
（一）感受現象 71
（二）能量管理 73
（三）追溯譜系 76
（四）顛覆瓦解 77
（五）重新評價 80
第八章 教育機制的未來 83
（一）學校設計 83
（二）等級秩序 85
（三）良美政體 88
第九章 結論 92
參考文獻
附 錄		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 21623 bytes-
dc.format.extent 30563 bytes-
dc.format.extent 169220 bytes-
dc.format.extent 148134 bytes-
dc.format.extent 81858 bytes-
dc.format.extent 74904 bytes-
dc.format.extent 111661 bytes-
dc.format.extent 110870 bytes-
dc.format.extent 108181 bytes-
dc.format.extent 89563 bytes-
dc.format.extent 78261 bytes-
dc.format.extent 52730 bytes-
dc.format.extent 76417 bytes-
dc.format.extent 203255 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088152502en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 尼采zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教育zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 藝術zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 現代性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 後現代zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Nietzscheen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Educationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Arten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Modernityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Postmodernen_US
dc.title (題名) 尼采的教育藝術zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Nietzsche`s Art of Educationen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Abbey, R. (2000). Nietzsche’s Middle Period. New York: Oxford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. Ahern, D. R. (1995). Nietzsche as Cultural Physician. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. Allison, D. B. (Ed.). (1985). The New Nietzsche: Contemporary Styles of Interpretation. Cambridge: The MIT.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. Aloni, N. (1991). Beyond Nihilism: Nietzsche’s Healing and Edifying Philosophy. Lanham: University Press of America.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. Ansell-Pearson, K. (1991). Nietzsche contra Rousseau: A Study of Nietzsche’s Moral and Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. Ansell-Pearson, K. (Ed.). (1991). Nietzsche and Modern German Thought. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. Aristotle, (1995). The Politics. (E. Barker, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. Bataille, G. (1994). On Nietzsche. (B. Boone, Trans.). New York: Paragon House.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. Bates, C. (1999). Play in a Godless World: The Theory and Practice of Play in Shakespeare, Nietzsche and Freud. London: Open Gate.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. Bauman, Z. (1989). Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-modernity and Intellectuals. Cambridge: Polity.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. Behler, E. (1991). Confrontations:Derrida/Heidegger/Nietzsche. (S. Taubeneck, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. Beistegui, M. & Sparks, S. (Eds.). (2000). Philosophy and Tragedy. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. Blondel, E. (1991). Nietzsche: The Body and Culture. (S. Hand, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. Brubacher, J. S. (1966). A History of the Problems of Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. Bullock, A. (1985). The Humanist Tradition in the West. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. Cahoone, L. E. (1995). The Ends of Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. Cameron, F. (2002). Nietzsche and the Problem of Morality. New York: Peter Lang.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18. Clark, M. (1990). Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19. Conway, D. W. & Groff, P. S. (Eds.). (1998). Nietzsche: Critical Assessments. (Vols. 1-4). London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20. Copper, D. E. (1983). Authenticity and Learning: Nietzsche’s Educational Philosophy. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21. Deleuze, G. (1983). Nietzsche and Philosophy. (H. Tomlinson, Trans.). New York: Columbia University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22. Derrida, J. (1979). Spurs: Nietzsche’s Styles. (B. Harlow, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23. Dudley, W. (2002). Hegel, Nietzsche, and Philosophy: Thinking Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24. Ferry, L., & Renaut, A. (Eds.). (1997). Why We Are Not Nietzscheans. (R. D. Loaiza, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25. Fraser, G. (2002). Redeeming Nietzsche: On the Piety of Unbelief. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26. Geuss, R. (1999). Morality, Culture, and History: Essay on German Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27. Gilman, S. L., Blair, C., & Parent, D. J. (Eds.). (1989). Friedrich Nietzsche on Rhetoric and Language. (S. L. Gilman, C. Blair, & D. J. Parent, Trans.). New York: Oxford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28. Gooding-Williams, R. (2001). Zarathustra’s Dionysian Modernism. Stanford: Stanford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29. Green, M. S. (2002). Nietzsche and the Transcendental Tradition. Urbana: University of Illinois.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30. Haar, M. (1996). Nietzsche and Metaphysics. (M. Gendre, Trans. & Ed.). Albany: State University of New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31. Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. (F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge: The MIT.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32. Hales, S. D. & Welshon, R. (2000). Nietzsche’s Perspectivism. Urbana: University of Illinois.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 33. Harrison, P. R. (1994). The Disenchantment of Reason: The Problem of Socrates in Modernity. Albany: State University of New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 34. Heidegger, M. (1979). Nietzsche. (D. F. Krell, Trans.). (Vols. 1-4). San Francisco: Harper & Row.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35. Heilke, T. (1998). Nietzsche’s Tragic Regime: Culture, Aesthetics, and Political Education. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 36. Heller, E. (1988). The Importance of Nietzsche: Ten Essays. Chicago: The University of Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 37. Highet, G. (1950). The Art of Teaching. New York: Vintage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 38. Houlgate, S. (1986). Hegel, Nietzsche and the Criticism of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 39. Hunt, L. H. (1993). Nietzsche and the Origin of Virtue. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 40. Jaeger, W. (1986). Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture. (G. Highet, Trans.). (Vols. 1-3). New York: Oxford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 41. Janaway, C. (Ed.). (1998). Willing and Nothingness: Schopenhauer as Nietzsche’s Educator. Oxford: Oxford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 42. Jaspers, K. (1969). Nietzsche: An Introduction to the Understanding of His Philosophical Activities. (C. F. Wallreff, & F. J. Schmitz, Trans.). Chicago: Gateway.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 43. Jurist, E. L. (2000). Beyond Hegel and Nietzsche: Philosophy, Culture, and Agency. Cambridge: The MIT.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 44. Kant, I. (1952). The Critique of Judgment. (J. C. Meredith, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 45. Kaufmann, W. (1978). Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. Princeton: Princeton University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 46. Kemal, S., Gaskell, I. & Conway, D. W. (Eds.). (1998). Nietzsche, Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 47. Klossowski, P. (1997). Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle. (D. W. Smith, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 48. Koelb, C. (Ed.). (1990). Nietzsche as Postmodernist: Essays Pro and Contra. Albany: State University of New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 49. Krell, D. F. & Wood, D. (Eds.). (1988). Exceedingly Nietzsche: Aspects of Contemporary Nietzsche-Interpretation. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 50. Lampert, L. (1986). Nietzsche’s Teaching: An Interpretation of Thus Spoke Zarathustra. New Haven: Yale University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 51. Leiter, B. (2002). Nietzsche on Morality. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 52. Lemco, G. (1992). Nietzsche as Educator. San Francisco: Mellen Research University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 53. Levine, P. (1995). Nietzsche and the Modern Crisis of the Humanities. Albany: State University of New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 54. Lippitt, J. (Ed.). (1999). Nietzsche’s Future. Hampshire: Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 55. Lippitt, J. & Urpeth, J. (Eds.). (2000). Nietzsche and the Divine. Manchester: Clinamen.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 56. Lomax, J. H. (2003). The Paradox of Philosophical Education: Nietzsche’s New Nobility and the Eternal Recurrence in Beyond Good and Evil. Lanham: Lexington.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 57. Löwith, K. (1997). Nietzsche’s Philosophy of the Eternal Recurrence of the Same. (J. H. Lomax, Trans.). Berkley: University of California.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 58. Magnus, B. & Higgins, K. M. (Eds.). (1996). The Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche. Cambridge: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 59. May, S. (1999). Nietzsche’s Ethics and his War on Morality. Oxford: Oxford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 60. McClelland, J. S. (1996). A History of Western Political Thought. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 61. Megill, A. (1985). Prophets of Extremity: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault, Derrida. Berkeley: University of California.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 62. Meynell, H. A. (1999). Postmodernism and the New Enlightenment. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 63. Montinari, M. (2003). Reading Nietzsche. (G. Whitlock, Trans.). Urbana: University of Illinois.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 64. Moore, G. (2002). Nietzsche, Biology and Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 65. Mullen, D. C. (1999). Beyond Subjectivity and Representation: Perception, Expression, and Creation in Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. Lanham: University Press of America.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 66. Müller-Lauter, W. (1999). Nietzsche: His Philosophy of Contradictions and the Contradictions of His Philosophy. (D. J. Parent, Trans.). Urbana: University of Illinois.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 67. Murphy, T. F. (1984). Nietzsche as Educator. Lanham: University Press of America.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 68. Nauert, C. G. (1995). Humanism and the Culture of Renaissance Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 69. Nehamas, A. (1985). Nietzsche: Life as Literature. Cambridge: Harvard University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 70. Owen, D. (1994). Maturity and Modernity: Nietzsche, Weber, Foucault and the Ambivalence of Reason. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 71. Owen, D. (1995). Nietzsche, Politics and Modernity: A Critique of Liberal Reason. London: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 72. Peters, M., Marshall, J. & Smeyers, P. (Eds.). (2001). Nietzsche’s Legacy for Education. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 73. Pippin, R. B. (1991). Modernism as a Philosophical Problem: On the Dissatisfactions of European High Culture. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 74. Plato, (1998). Republic. (R. Waterfield, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 75. Porter, J. I. (2000). The Invention of Dionysus: An Essay on The Birth of Tragedy. Stanford: Stanford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 76. Rabinow, P. (Ed.). (1984). The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 77. Rampley, M. (2000). Nietzsche, Aesthetics and Modernity. New York: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 78. Renaut, A. (1997). The Era of the Individual: A Contribution to a History of Subjectivity. (M. B. DeBevoise, & F. Philip, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 79. Richardson, J. (1996). Nietzsche’s System. New York: Oxford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 80. Ridley, A. (1998). Nietzsche’s Conscience: Six Character Studies from the Genealogy. Ithaca: Cornell University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 81. Rosen, S. (1995). The Mask of Enlightenment: Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. New York: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 82. Santaniello, W. (Ed.). (2001). Nietzsche and the Gods. Albany: State University of New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 83. Schacht, R. (Ed.). (1994). Nietzsche, Genealogy, Morality: Essays on Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals. Berkeley: University of California.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 84. Schacht, R. (1995). Making Sense of Nietzsche: Reflections Timely and Untimely. Urbana: University of Illinois.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 85. Schacht, R. (Ed.). (2001). Nietzsche’s Postmoralism: Essays on Nietzsche’s Prelude to Philosophy’s Future. New York: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 86. Schiller, F. (1985). On the Aesthetic Education of Man. (E. M. Wilkinson, & L. A. Willoughby, Eds. & Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 87. Schrag, C. O. (1997). The Self after Postmodernity. New Haven: Yale University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 88. Schrift, A. D. (1990). Nietzsche and the Question of Interpretation: Between Hermeneutics and Deconstruction. New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 89. Schrift, A. D. (Ed.). (1997). The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethics of Generosity. New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 90. Schrift, A. D. (Ed.). (2000). Why Nietzsche Still? : Reflections on Drama, Culture, and Politics. Berkeley: University of California.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 91. Sedgwick, P. R. (Ed.). (1995). Nietzsche: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 92. Silverman, H. J. (Ed.). (2000). Philosophy and Desire. New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 93. Sleinis, E. E. (1994). Nietzsche’s Revaluation of Values: A Study in Strategies. Urbana: University of Illinois.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 94. Smith, J. H. (2000). Dialectics of the Will: Freedom, Power, and Understanding in Modern French and German Thought. Detroit: Wayne State University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 95. Solomon, R. C. (Ed.). (1980). Nietzsche: A Collection of Critical Essays. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 96. Solomon, R. C. (1993). The Passion: Emotions and the Meaning of Life. Indianapolis: Hackett.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 97. Spinks, L. (2003). Friedrich Nietzsche. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 98. Steiner, R. (1995). The Spirit of the Waldorf School. (R. F. Lathe, & N. P. Whittaker, Trans.). Hudson: Anthroposophic.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 99. Steiner, R. (1996). Waldorf Education and Anthroposophy 2. (N. P. Whittaker, & R. F. Lathe, & R. Everett, Trans.). Hudson: Anthroposophic.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 100. Steinhart, E. (2000). On Nietzsche. Belmont: Wadsworth.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 101. Strong, T. B. (1988). Friedrich Nietzsche and the Politics of Transfiguration. Berkeley: University of California.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 102. Taylor, C. (1975). Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 103. Thiele, L. P. (1990). Friedrich Nietzsche and the Politics of the Soul: A Study of Heroic Individualism. Princeton: Princeton University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 104. Thomas, K. (Ed.). (1997). German Philosophers: Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 105. Tongeren, P. J. M. v. (2000). Reinterpreting Modern Culture: An Introduction to Friedrich Nietzsche’s Philosophy. West Lafayette: Purdue University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 106. Vattimo, G. (1993). The Adventure of Difference: Philosophy after Nietzsche and Heidegger. (C. Blamires, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 107. Vattimo, G. (2001). Nietzsche: An Introduction. (N. Martin, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 108. Villa, D. (2001). Socratic Citizenship. Princeton: Princeton University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 109. White, R. J. (1997). Nietzsche and the Problem of Sovereignty. Urbana: University of Illinois.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 110. White, R. J. (Ed.). (2002). Nietzsche. Aldershot: Ashgate.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 111. Williams, L. L. (2001). Nietzsche’s Mirror: The World as Will to Power. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 112. Winchester, J. J. (1994). Nietzsche’s Aesthetic Turn: Reading Nietzsche after Heidegger, Deleuze, and Derrida. Albany: State University of New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 113. Young, J. (1992). Nietzsche’s Philosophy of Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 114. Zuckert, C. H. (1996). Postmodern Platos: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Gadamer, Strauss, Derrida. Chicago: The University of Chicago.zh_TW