| dc.contributor.advisor | 彭欽清 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Peng, Chin-ching | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 林惠嫻 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Lin, Huie-hsien | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 林惠嫻 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Lin, Huie-hsien | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2005 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 16:33:53 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 16:33:53 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 16:33:53 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0090951019 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33426 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 90951019 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 94 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本論文旨在探討作筆記(note-taking)是否能幫助英語為外語的國中生增進會話或短文的聽力能力。根據本研究生的經驗及本實驗對象的個人英語聽力學習狀況的問卷調查結果，學生對英語聽力測驗中的對話或短文題型最易受挫。因此本研究嘗試引進學習策略中的作筆記方式以幫助學生改善對這種題型的聽力能力。 本論文所要探討的問題包含(1)受試者認為最難的聽力測驗題型是什麼？(2)國中生是否只重聽同樣內容及老師的測後解釋就能增進對話或短文測驗的英語聽力能力呢？(3)做筆記的學習者是否比未做筆記者進步？(4)作筆記策略適用程度高的學習者或程度低的學習者？(5)受試者對本實驗的意見:最有用和最無用的聽力測驗指導方式為何？受試者在此項實驗中改善最多的為那三樣？ 本實驗期約四個月，包含國三學生兩個班70個學生。一班為實驗班，另一班為對照班。為了進一步的比較，每一班再分為高、低分群。實驗班考聽力測驗時要作筆記，對照班則無此要求。所有的教材全取自康軒出版社，詹麗馨，李欣蓉編著的 “國中英語聽力測驗”第五冊。 由統計分析及問卷調查得到下列結論：（1）國中生認為最困難的聽力測驗題型為聽完短文或對話後選出最適當的答案; (2)在實驗後，對照班及實驗班均進步並達顯著水準。由此可見若老師提供學習者重聽同樣的內容及測後講解聽力內容讓學生有更正的機會，學習者仍可以改善聽力能力；（3）雖然實驗班也進步並達顯著水準，但和對照班比較結果，不論是全班或高低分群，均未有顯著差異。可見做筆記的學習者並沒有比未做筆記者進步。這意謂著並非每種學習策略適合每個人，而且也沒有保證成功的學習策略。因此，老師應介紹各種學習策略以供學習者選擇有利個人學習的策略；（4）在實驗班中，低分群進步分數達顯著水準且和高分群的進步分數達顯著差異。顯然，作筆記策略嘉惠低分群但可能導致高分群無法專心聽；(5) 問卷調查結果發現大多數受試者認為老師試後講解聽力內容幫助最大;知道不同的口音助益最小。此外，依受試者意見顯示，作 筆記可使學生不分心，養成記重點字的習慣並且容易記得內容。 由以上研究，建議老師聽力測驗多播放幾次，並在測後講解內容及指導學生作筆記的方式。不過，作筆記較適合低分群而非高分群。因此，老師可以不要求高分群作筆記，避免影響他們的專心度。此外，本研究發現學習者很難去預測即將聽到的句子或內容。 關鍵字；聽力訓練，作筆記策略，國中生 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This study aims to explore if note-taking could assist EFL junior high school students to improve their listening comprehension in the test style of “selecting anoptimal choice after listening to a dialogue or a short passage.” According to the researcher’s experience and the personal profile questionnaires of students, studentsfeel frustrated easily when they have a listening test on a dialogue or a short passage. Thus, the researcher tries to help them improve their listening comprehension in the test style by teaching them how to take notes. The research questions of this study included: (1) What is the most difficultlistening test style? (2) Could junior high school students improve their listening ability in understanding a dialogue or a short passage bylistening to the same content several times and through the teacher’s teaching instruction? (3) Did junior high school students who were asked to take notes perform better than those who were not? (4) Does note-taking benefit only high proficiency subjects or only low proficiency subjects? (5) How did the subjects feel about the experiment? What are the most useful and useless ways in a listening activity? What are the first three improved aspects the subjects felt after the experiment? The duration of this experiment was four months. Seventy of the third junior high school students from two classes were involved in the study. One class was assigned as an experiment class and the other as a control class. For further comparison, each class was subdivided into high and low proficiency groups. The experiment class was asked to take notes while listening but the control class was not.All the materials were adopted from “English Listening Comprehension for Junior High School”(Li-shin Jan, Shin-rung Li, 2001, Kan-shiuan Publisher). The statistical analyses and the questionnaires showed the following conclusions: (1) The most difficult listening test style was selecting an optimal choice after listening to a dialogue or a passage.(2) The classes made significant progress after the experiment. The result indicated that learners improved their listening ability when a teacher provided the students with sufficient practice by letting them listen to the same content several times and explained the meanings of the sentences after a listening test; (3) Although making significant progress, the experiment class, compared with the control class, did not improve significantly. The two different proficiency groups did not make significant progress, either. This could imply that not every learning strategy fits every learner. Also, no learning strategy assures success. Therefore, a teacher had better introduce different kinds of learning strategies for learners to choose an optimal learning strategy on their own; (4) In the experiment class, low proficiency learners made more progress than high proficiency ones at a significant level. Apparently, note-taking benefited low proficiency learners but may hinder high proficiency learners from concentrating on listening. (5) The subjects chose “teacher’s explanation of the content after a listening test” as the most useful way to improve their listening ability. However, they thought “knowing the different accents” as the least useful way. In addition, as seen in the result of the feedback questionnaire, note-taking helped learners listen without distraction, acquire a habit of writing down key words and remember the content easily. The research suggested that a teacher should let students listen to the same content several times on the tape, explain the meanings of the sentences after a listening test, and instruct learners how to take notes. However, note-taking was good for low proficiency learners, but not for high proficiency ones. Thus, a teacher might not need to ask high achievers to take notes, which might block them to concentrate on listening. In addition, it seems not easy for learners to predict the coming message. Key words: listening training, “note-taking strategy”, junior high school students | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………iii TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………………iv LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………….………..vi CHINESE ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………….vii ENGLISH ABSTRACT……………………………………………………….….…ix CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION………………………………….…………………………..…1 Motivation……………………………………………………………………..1 Significance and Purpose of the Study……………….………………………..2 Research Questions……………………………………………………………5 Definition of Terms……………………………………………………………5 2. LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………………….8 English Listening Comprehension…………………………………………….8 Difficulties Encountered in EFL Environment in English Listening Comprehension and Solutions to the Difficulties……………………………..9 Note-Taking……………………………………..……………………………19 3. METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………………….24 Subjects………………………………………………….……………………..24 Instrumentation…………………………………………………………………36 Materials…………………………………………………………………….36 The Contents of the Tape……………………………………………………37 The Personal Profile Questionnaire…………………………………………38 The Feedback Questionnaire………………………………………………..38 Pretest……………………………………………………………………….39 Posttest………………………………………………………………………40 Procedures………………………………………………………………………40 Data Analysis………………………………………………………………...43 Scores of the Pretest, the Posttest and Nine Units of Listening Tests……………………….………………………………………………43 Scores of the Responses to the Questionnaires……………………………43 Statistical Analysis………………………………………………………...44 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS…………………………………………………45 The Most Difficult Listening Test Style………………………………………...46 Comparisons on the Pretest and the Posttest……………………………………47 Comparisons Between the Experiment Class and the Control Class…...………48 Comparisons on Different Proficiency Groups in the Experiment Class……….50 Results of Feedback Questionnaire……………………………………………..51 5. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSIONS…………………………………………..62 Findings…………………………………………………………………………62 Pedagogical Implications……………………………………………………….65 Limitations and Suggestions……………………………………………………66 APPENDIXES...……………………………………………………………………..68 A. Personal Profile Questionnaire………………………………………………...68 B. Feedback Questionnaire……………………………………………………….70 C. Pretest Questions………………………………………………………………71 D1. Listening Tests for the Experiment Class……………………………………..75 D2. Listening Tests for the Control Class………………………………………..102 E. Posttest Questions…………………………………………………………...103 F. 康軒文教事業著作權授權契約書………………………………………….106 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………….107 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 3-1 Results of Pretest of the Two Classes………….………………………….25 Table 3-2 Distribution of Proficiency Levels….……………………………………..26 Table 3-3 Years of Learning English Before the Experiment………………………..27 Table 3-4 Ways of Learning English After School…………………..………………28 Table 3-5 Hours Spent per Week in Listening Practice After School………………..29 Table 3-6 Attitude Toward English Learning..…….…………………………………30 Table 3-7 Rank of Listening Ability Among Four Skills……………………………31 Table 3-8 Desire to Improve Listening Competence.………………………………..32 Table 3-9 Primary Factor Hindering Listening Comprehension.…………………….34 Table 3-10 The Best Way of Instruction to Improve Listening Comprehension…….35 Table 3-11 Instruments and Purposes……………..……….………………………...40 Table 4-1 The Most Difficult Listening Test Style…………………………………..46 Table 4-2 Comparison in Experiment Class..…………………………………..…….47 Table 4-3 Comparison in Control Class.……………………………………………..47 Table 4-4 Comparison of High Proficiency Groups..…………………….…………..48 Table 4-5 Comparison of Low Proficiency Groups……………….………………...49 Table 4-6 Comparison of Different Groups in Experiment Class……………….…..51 Table 4-7 The Most Useful Way in a Listening Activity..……………………………53 Table 4-8 The Least Useful Way in a Listening Activity..…...………………………54 Table 4-9 The First Three Improved Aspects in Experiment Class.…………………56 Table 4-10 The First Three Improved Aspects in Control Class .……………………58 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 46351 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 11337 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 88030 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 40500 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 23648 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 65491 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 53479 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 44253 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 21702 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 25409 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090951019 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 聽力訓練 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 作筆記策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 國中生 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | listening strategy | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | note-taking | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | junior high school | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | A Preliminary Study on the Effects of "Note-taking" Strategy on Different Proficiency Levels of Junior High School Students | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | 作筆記策略對不同程度的國中生在英語聽力訓練成效之初探 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bacon, S. M. (1992). Phrases of listening to authentic input in Spanish: a descriptive study. Foreign Language Annuals, 25 (4), 317-334. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Berliner, D. C. (1971). ATI in two studies of learning from lecture instruction. Berkeley, Calif.: Far West Lab for Educational Research & Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 046 249) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bernhardt,E. B. & James, C. J. (1987). The teacher and testing of comprehension in foreign language learning. Brickbitchler: Diane W., Ed. Paper presented at the 1987 Central States Conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 285 420) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Blau,E. K. (1990). The effect of syntax, speed and pause on listening | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 24(4), 746-753. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Boyle, J. R. (1984). Factors affecting listening comprehension. ELT Journal, 38, 34-38. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brindley, G. P. (1982). Listening proficiency descriptions. Sydney: Adult Migrant Education Service. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brooks, N. (1964). Language and language learning.(2nd ed.) New York: Harcourt, Brace and World. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brown, A. L. & Palinscar, A.S. (1982). Inducing strategies learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 1-17. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brown, E. D. (1985). Becoming a master student. Borough of Manhattan Community College. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brown, H, Douglas (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. London: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Prentice Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Byrnes, H (1984). The role of listening comprehension: A theoretical base. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 317-329. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carrier, Carol A., & Titus, Amy. (1981). Effects of note-taking pre-training and test mode expectations on learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 18 (4), 385-397. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carroll, D. W. (1999). Psychology of language(3rd ed.). CA: ITP Inc. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1992). Building bridges: Content and learning strategies for ESL. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: a bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 227-249. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chastain Kenneth (1976). Developing second language skills: Theory to practice | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (2nd ed) Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chiang, C. S. & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 345-74 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Coakley, C. G., &Wolvin, A. D. (1986). Listening in the native language. In B.H. Wing (Ed.), Listening, reading, and writing: analysis and application. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Critical Languages Programs (2004). Hamilton College. [On-line]. Available: http://www.hamilton.edu/academics/clp/Content_pages/PAGE_CLPtape.html | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S.(1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 8-14. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dunkel, P. A. (1986). Developing listening fluency in second language: the theoretical principles and pedagogical consideration. The modern language joural, 70 (2), 99-106. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dunkel, P. A. (1988). The content of L1 and L2 students’ lecture notes and its relation to test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 259-281. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dunkel, P. A. (1989). Effects of note taking, memory, and language proficiency on lecture learning for native and non-native speakers of English. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 543-549. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dunkel, P. A.(1991). Listening in the native and second/foreign language: toward an integration of research and prctice. TESOL Quaterly, 25 (3), 431-457. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Emmert, P. (1994). A definition of listening. Listening Post, 51, 6. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fan, Y. (1993). Listening: problems and solutions. English Teaching Forum, 31(1), 16-19. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Frase, L. T. (1970). Boundary conditions for mathemagenic behaviors. Review of Educational research, 40, 337-347. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hale, G. A. & Courtney, R. (1991). Note taking and listening comprehension on the test of English as a foreign language. Research Reports, No. 34. Educational Testing Service. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hale, G. A. & Courtney, R. (1994). The effects of note taking on listening comprehension in the test of English as a foreign language. Language Testing, 11, 29-47. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Henner-Stanchina, C. (1977). Evaluation in an autonomous learning scheme. Melanges Pedagogiques, 1977. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 149 630) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hsiung, W. L. (2002). An analysis on listening comprehension difficulties in junior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan, ROC. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, T. L. (2003). The effect of listening strategy instruction for junior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan, ROC. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kiewra, Kenneth A. (1985). Learning from a lecture: An investigation of note-taking, review and attendance at a lecture. Human learning, 4, 73-77. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kiewra, Kenneth A., & Benton, Stephen L. (1988). The relationship between information-processing ability and note-taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 33-44. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lee, H. M., (2001). The role of practice in successful EFL listening achievement for Taiwanese university English majors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Taxas, Austin. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lightbown, Pasty M.(1985). Great Expectations: second language acquisition research | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics 6, 173-189 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lin, S. H. (2000). A Study of listening comprehension strategies used by senior high school student in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan, ROC. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lin, Y. J. (2003). A case study on the effects of applying authentic materials as listening comprehension supplements for EFL senior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Chengchi University, Taiwan, ROC. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Long, D. R. (1990). What you don’t know can’t help you: An exploratory study of background knowledge and second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 65-80. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lung, R. J. (1991). A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 75, 196-204. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mayer, R. D. (1975). Information processing variables in learning to solve problems. Review of Educational Research, 45, 525-541. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDonald, B.A. Dansereau, D. Garland, J. C. Holley, C.D. & Collins, K. W.(1979). Pair learning and transfer of text processing skills. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 1979. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Morton, J. & Patternson, M. (1987). A new attempt at an interpretation, or, an attempt at a new interpretation. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia, (2nd ed). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Murphy, J. M. (1985). Oral communication in TESOL: integrating speaking, listening and pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (1), 51-73. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Noblitt, James S. (2004). Cognitive approaches to listening comprehension. [On-line]. Available: http://www.unc.edu/cit/iat-archive/publications/noblitt/noblitt3.html | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | O’Malley. J. M. (1987). The effects of training in use of learning strategies. In Wendon, A., and Rubin, J. (Eds.), Learning strategies in language learning. Great Britain: Prentice Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ou, H. C. (1996). The effectiveness of teaching English comprehension. Studies in English and Literature, 1, 30-39. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Oxford,L.R.(1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Peter, R. J. & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 514-522 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Richards, J. C. (1983). Listening comprehension: Approach, design, procedure. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | TESOL Quarterly 17, 219-240 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Richards, J. C. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rivers,Wilga M.(1981). Teaching foreign language skills.(2nd ed). Chicago: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | University of Chicago Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rost, M.(1990). Listening in language learning. New York: Longman. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learners” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schmidt-Rinehart, B. C. (1994). The effects of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 78, 179-189. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sebranek, P. & Meyer, V. (1985). Basic English revisited: A student handbook. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 253 883). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shohamy, E. & Inbar, O. (1991). Validation of listening comprehension tests: the effect of text and question type. Language Testing, 8, 23-40. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Teng, H. C. (1997). An investigation of EFL listening strategies by Taiwanese college students. Paper presented at the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching, Taiwan, ROC. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ur, P. (1984). Teaching listening comprehension. Cambridge: Cambridge | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Underwood, M. (1989). Teaching listening. New York: Longman | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Vandergrift, L. (1996). Listening strategies of core French high school students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52 (2), 200-223. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Willis, J. (1981). Teaching English through English. London: Longman. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zheng, P. S. (1995). The effects of note-taking on Chinese college students’ listening comprehension performance. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan, ROC. | zh_TW |
