學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 論胡塞爾對「二元論」之超克
作者 周晏伊
Chou,Yenyi
貢獻者 汪文聖
周晏伊
Chou,Yenyi
關鍵詞 胡塞爾
心物二元論
身心二元論
心靈自然化
純粹意識
身體
心靈
現象學心理學
超驗現象學
日期 2006
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 16:51:13 (UTC+8)
摘要 本論文試圖以胡塞爾現象學解決哲學史以來留下的哲學難題之可能-「心物或心身二元論」(dualism),克服胡塞爾在《危機》一書中分析的二元論之根源「心靈自然化」問題。哲學層次上心物二分(斷裂)延伸出不可認識之「不可知論」;身心二分說明了理論解釋上的問題,重點是如何看待心靈與身體及其關係都是根本要待釐清。當代心靈哲學為解決心身問題出發而傾向將心靈物化,實體唯物主義為基本共識,精神自然化的思考導致精神醫學採以「器質論」立場。並且科學心理學作為物理學邏輯延續也都導向「還原」方法研究可觀察實驗的行為上。

胡塞爾的將心物關係轉換為「純粹意識中意向活動與意向對象的意向關係」,具體經驗事實世界的本來面貌為意向活動所形構的意向對象,反過來說意義賦予活動成就了事實自身。而身心問題溯回至心靈與身體原初意義而自然消解兩者二分的問題。關於二元論的解決同時是心靈自然化的克服,現象學試圖理解一門非自然化的心靈的可能,徹底批判科學化心理學處理,建構一門徹底擺心理物理科學影響之下的獨立心理學即「純粹現象學心理學」。


關鍵字:胡塞爾、心物二元論、身心二元論、心靈自然化、純粹意識、身體、心靈、現象學心理學、超驗現象學
The thesis tries to solve the philosophical problem-mind-body dualism-in philosophical history by Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology, and the problem of naturalize mind or soul which causes dualism in “The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental phenomenology”. Philosophically, mind-body(matter) dualism leads to agnosticism in epistemology. Mind-body dualism problem comes from the problem of interpretation in theory, and it is important to essentially understand mind, body and their relation. The philosophy of mind in modern times makes mind materialize in order to solve the mind-body dualism, and substance materialism is accepted by most of philosophers. This effects psychiatry thinks psychosis as an organic disease. Besides, scientific psychology is in logical continuity with, and relies partly upon, the physical sciences, and makes use of reductive method to research observable and experimental behavior.

Edmund Husserl turns mind-body relation into conscious relation of noesis-noema in pure consciousness. Fact world as noema is constituted by noesis, or bestowing sense achieves things themselves. Solving mind-body problem is going back to primary meaning of mind and body, and then the problem is solved naturally. Solving mind-body dualism is the same as naturalized mind. Phenomenology attempts to know anti-naturalized mind, to criticize thoroughly scientific psychology, and to establish a purely phenomenological psychology which is free of everything psychophysical.



Key words:Edmund Husserl、dualism、naturalize mind ∕soul、pure consciousness、body、mind、phenomenological psychology、transcendental phenomenology
參考文獻 Edmund Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology:An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. David Carr(trans.). Northwestern University press, 1970.
--:Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology to a phenomenological philosophy. First book. Translated by F. Kersten. Martinus Nijhoff publishers. 1982.
--:Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book. Translated by R.rojcewicz and A.schuwer. Kluwer Academic publishers. 1989.
--:Cartesian Meditations:An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by Dorion Cairns. Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.Joseph J. Kockelmans.(1967)Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenological Psychology. Duquesne University.
--:“Phenomenology”for the Encyclopaedia Britannica ,Richard E. Palmer(tran.)Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 2(1971):77-90
--:Phenomenology and the crisis of philosophy:Philosophy as a rigorous science, and Philosophy and the crsis of European man. New York:Harper&Row, c1965.
Gurwitsch,Aron. Studies in phenomenology and psychology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.1966.
Erazim Kohák, Idea and experience:Edmund Husserl’s Project of phenomenology in Ideas I. The university of Chicago, 1978.
Paul Ricoeur, Husserl:an analysis of his Phenomenology. Edward G. Ballard and Lester E. Embree.(trans.)Northwestern University press, 1967.
Amedeo Giorgi.(ed.)Phenomenology and psychological Research, PA:Duquesne University Press,1985.
A. Giorgi.“The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure”, in Journal of phenomenological psychology, Fall97, vol.28, Issue2, 235-261.
Giorgi, Amedeo. Phenomenology and psychological research. Duquesne University Press, c1985
Giorgi, Amedeo, Psychology as a human science. New York : Harper & Row, c1970.
Lester Embree.(ed.)Encyclopedia of phenomenology. Kluwer Academic publishers.1997,
Joesph J. Kockelmans. (1967)Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenological Psychology. Duquesne University.
Jean Petitot, Francisco J. Barela.(ed.) Natualizing phenomenology. Stanford university press. 1999.
Paul M. Churchland(1988). Matter and Consciousness:a contemporary introduction to the philosophy of mind, Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
Searle, J. R. ﹙1992﹚. The Rediscovery of the Mind, Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press ,
Louis p. Pojman. What can we Know? an introduction to the theory of knowledge . Belmont, Calif. : Wadsworth Pub., c1995.
Dermot Moran. Introduction to phenomenology. London ; New York : Routledge, 2000.
Spiegelberg, Herbert. The phenomenological movement : a historical introduction. M. Nijhoff , 1982.
Kern, Iso.(1977).The three Ways to the transcendental Phenomenological Reduction in the Philosophy of Edmund Husserl, in F.Elliston&P. Mccormick(eds.,)Husserl:Expositons and Appraisals, University of Notre Dame Press.
Searle, J. R.﹙1992﹚. The Rediscovery of the Mind, Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press .
胡塞爾著,〈《邏輯研究》的任務和意義〉(1925),選自《胡塞爾選集》兩卷本,上海三聯書店,1997年,倪梁康選編,上卷。譯自:E.Husserl, HUSSERLIANA Bd. IX, “Phaenomenologishe Psychologie”, Den Haag 1968(《胡塞爾全集》第九卷,《現象學的心理學》)。
胡塞爾著,〈純粹現象學及其研究領域和方法〉(1917),選自《胡塞爾選集》上卷,上海三聯書店,1997年,倪梁康選編。
胡塞爾著,〈現象學心理學和先驗現象學〉,(1927)《胡塞爾選集》兩卷本,上海三聯書店,1997年,倪梁康選編,上卷。
胡塞爾著,〈先驗哲學的建構〉,(1928),《胡塞爾選集》兩卷本,上海三聯書店,1997年,倪梁康選編,上卷)。譯自:E. Husserl, “Amsterdamer Vortraege”, in: HUSSERLIANA Bd.IX, “Phaenomenologische Psychologie”, Den Haag 1968.
胡塞爾著,〈現象學-不列顛大百科全書條目〉(1927)倪梁康譯(譯自德文版《胡塞爾全集》第九卷《現象學心理學)》),編錄於倪梁康選編《胡塞爾選集》,上海三聯書店,1996年。
胡塞爾著,《歐洲科學危機與超驗現象學》。王炳文譯,北京:商務印書館,2001年。
胡塞爾著《純粹現象學與現象學哲學的觀念.第一卷:純粹現象學通論》,李幼蒸譯,北京:商務印書館,1997年。
胡塞爾著《笛卡爾式的沈思》,張廷國譯,中國城市出版社,2001年。
胡塞爾著《現象學的觀念》,倪梁康譯,上海:上海譯文出版發行,1986年。
胡塞爾著《哲學作為嚴格科學》,北京:商務印書館,2002。
汪文聖著,《胡塞爾與海德格》,台北:遠流,1995。
畢普塞維克(Edo Pivcevic)著 《胡塞爾與現象學》,廖仁義譯,台北:桂冠,1986。
倪梁康著,《現象學的始基》,廣州:廣東人民出版社,2004。
倪梁康著,《胡塞爾現象學概念通釋》,北京:三聯,1999。
倪梁康著,《現象學及其效應》,北京:三聯,1994。
倪梁康著,《面對實事本身:現象學經典文選》,北京:東方出版社,2000。
傅偉勳 著 《西洋哲學史》,台北:三民書局,1996。
溤俊著 《開啟理性之門》,北京:中國人民大學出版社,2005。
陳嘉明 主編 《實在、心靈與信念:當代美國哲學概論》,北京:人民出版社,2005。
笛卡兒著 《第一哲學沉思集》,龐景仁譯,北京:商務印書館,1998年。
笛卡兒著 《我思故我在》,錢志純 編譯,台北:志文出版社,1972年。
王溢嘉 譯輯 《生命與科學對話錄》,野鵝出版社,台北,1993
羅伊.波特(Roy Porter)著 巫毓全 譯 《瘋狂簡史》,台北,左岸,2002。。
柏格森著,吳士棟譯,《時間與自由意志》,商務印書館,2004.
羅伯.索科羅斯基著 李維倫譯《現象學十四講》,台北:心靈工坊,2004。
Searle, J. R.《心、腦與科學》,上海:上海譯文出版發行,1984年。
游淙祺著 〈現象學與超驗現象學〉發表於中山大學第一屆兩岸三地現象學學術會議。
期刊論文
汪文聖,〈現象學、心理學與科學〉,〉,第三屆「倫理思想與道德關懷」學術研討會,淡江大學通識與核心課程。
蔡錚雲,〈現象學心理學的理論與應用(第二部份):實徵與詮釋兩種應用模式系譜上的對照〉,《應用心理研究》,第29期,2006,頁53-7o。
蔡錚雲;龔卓軍,〈現象學心理學〉,《應用心理研究》,29期,2006,頁33-34。
游淙祺,〈現象學心理學與超驗現象學:從胡塞爾的脈絡來看〉,《應用心理研究》,29期,2006,頁35-52。
李維倫,〈論嬰兒的微笑〉,《應用心理研究》,29期,2006,頁131-156。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
哲學研究所
91154015
95
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0911540151
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 汪文聖zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 周晏伊zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chou,Yenyien_US
dc.creator (作者) 周晏伊zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chou,Yenyien_US
dc.date (日期) 2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 16:51:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 16:51:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 16:51:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0911540151en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33485-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 哲學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91154015zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本論文試圖以胡塞爾現象學解決哲學史以來留下的哲學難題之可能-「心物或心身二元論」(dualism),克服胡塞爾在《危機》一書中分析的二元論之根源「心靈自然化」問題。哲學層次上心物二分(斷裂)延伸出不可認識之「不可知論」;身心二分說明了理論解釋上的問題,重點是如何看待心靈與身體及其關係都是根本要待釐清。當代心靈哲學為解決心身問題出發而傾向將心靈物化,實體唯物主義為基本共識,精神自然化的思考導致精神醫學採以「器質論」立場。並且科學心理學作為物理學邏輯延續也都導向「還原」方法研究可觀察實驗的行為上。

胡塞爾的將心物關係轉換為「純粹意識中意向活動與意向對象的意向關係」,具體經驗事實世界的本來面貌為意向活動所形構的意向對象,反過來說意義賦予活動成就了事實自身。而身心問題溯回至心靈與身體原初意義而自然消解兩者二分的問題。關於二元論的解決同時是心靈自然化的克服,現象學試圖理解一門非自然化的心靈的可能,徹底批判科學化心理學處理,建構一門徹底擺心理物理科學影響之下的獨立心理學即「純粹現象學心理學」。


關鍵字:胡塞爾、心物二元論、身心二元論、心靈自然化、純粹意識、身體、心靈、現象學心理學、超驗現象學
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The thesis tries to solve the philosophical problem-mind-body dualism-in philosophical history by Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology, and the problem of naturalize mind or soul which causes dualism in “The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental phenomenology”. Philosophically, mind-body(matter) dualism leads to agnosticism in epistemology. Mind-body dualism problem comes from the problem of interpretation in theory, and it is important to essentially understand mind, body and their relation. The philosophy of mind in modern times makes mind materialize in order to solve the mind-body dualism, and substance materialism is accepted by most of philosophers. This effects psychiatry thinks psychosis as an organic disease. Besides, scientific psychology is in logical continuity with, and relies partly upon, the physical sciences, and makes use of reductive method to research observable and experimental behavior.

Edmund Husserl turns mind-body relation into conscious relation of noesis-noema in pure consciousness. Fact world as noema is constituted by noesis, or bestowing sense achieves things themselves. Solving mind-body problem is going back to primary meaning of mind and body, and then the problem is solved naturally. Solving mind-body dualism is the same as naturalized mind. Phenomenology attempts to know anti-naturalized mind, to criticize thoroughly scientific psychology, and to establish a purely phenomenological psychology which is free of everything psychophysical.



Key words:Edmund Husserl、dualism、naturalize mind ∕soul、pure consciousness、body、mind、phenomenological psychology、transcendental phenomenology
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目次...................................................1
導言...................................................3

第一章 《危機》中「二元論」的問題.........................4

1. 心身二元論問題之闡述..................................4
2.《危機》中之二元論問題.................................6
2.1自然科學與二元論-世界的分裂與世界意義的改變...........6
2.2科學對笛卡爾的影響..................................8
2.21自然科學提供笛卡爾的思想導引與前提................ 8
2.22 問題的產生-自然性的自我.........................9
2.3洛克之心靈自然化與認識論的問題........................11
2.31心靈自然化..................................... 11
2.32 洛克之不可知論(agnosticism)...................13
2.4休姆動搖客觀主義 ..................................14
2.5總結:《危機》中之二元論問題.........................14
3.解決問題之策略與論述結構................................15


第二章「意識理論」對「心物二元論」之克服

1.超越物(物)與內在物(體驗)之區別.....................17
2.對超越物(物)與內在物(體驗)之考察:超越知覺與內在知覺..19
3.「超越」概念之轉換...................................20
4. 知識論意涵.........................................22
5. 現象學方法-懸擱(Epoché)..........................23
6. 意識作為一切前提....................................25
7. 主觀性成就的揭示....................................27
7.1 意向性之「關於某物的意識」........................28
7.2 同一性(identity)之主觀作用.....................31
8. 總結..............................................33
8.1 心物二元論的超克...............................33
8.2 現象學作為「唯心論」?..........................35

第三章 「身心問題」的解決..............................37

1. 心靈的概念與二元論之解決............................37
2. 身體的概念........................................39
2.1觸覺觀點........................................40
2.2視覺觀點........................................42
2.3意志對身體的控制.................................43
2.4從身體概念來看「身心關係」與「身心二分的解決」.......44
3. 心靈、意識、意志與身體..............................45
4. 心身關係之其他學說.................................46
4.1關於唯物論身心問題之解決..........................46
4.2心身關係之其他學說...............................48
4.3問題解決方式省察.................................49
5.「心物二元論」與「身心二元論」:純粹意識、心與身........50


第四章 關於心靈自然化的問題...........................52

1. 心靈自然化的問題...................................52
1.1哲學層次之思考...................................52
1.2精神疾病反省.....................................52
2. 心靈或意識自然化...................................55
3. 科學心理學的批判:心靈概念與方法學的反駁..............57
4. 作為「意向心理學」(intentional psychology)的心靈科學61
5.「現象學心理學」之理解前導............................63 -回到〈《邏輯研究》的任務和意義〉一文
5.1 觀念對象之本質..................................64
5.2意識方式之回溯...................................65
5.3 從一門「純粹描述心理學」向「先天(本質)現象學」過渡.66
5.4先天心理學對於認識論的意義.........................67
6.「純粹」現象學之前導.................................67
7. 「意識結構」之先導..................................71
8.「現象學心理學」與「超驗現象學」之前導..................72
9. 「現象學心理學」作為一門獨立之心理學...................76
9.1〈現象學-不列顛大百科全書條目〉之現象學心理學........76
9.2《危機》之現象學心理學.............................80
10. 胡塞爾現象學對心理學之意義或影響.....................84

結論.................................................87
限制與展望

參考書目..............................................91
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 41351 bytes-
dc.format.extent 41489 bytes-
dc.format.extent 94301 bytes-
dc.format.extent 71446 bytes-
dc.format.extent 309697 bytes-
dc.format.extent 305459 bytes-
dc.format.extent 261853 bytes-
dc.format.extent 389258 bytes-
dc.format.extent 135513 bytes-
dc.format.extent 90207 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0911540151en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 胡塞爾zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 心物二元論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 身心二元論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 心靈自然化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 純粹意識zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 身體zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 心靈zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 現象學心理學zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 超驗現象學zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 論胡塞爾對「二元論」之超克zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Edmund Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology:An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. David Carr(trans.). Northwestern University press, 1970.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) --:Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology to a phenomenological philosophy. First book. Translated by F. Kersten. Martinus Nijhoff publishers. 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) --:Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book. Translated by R.rojcewicz and A.schuwer. Kluwer Academic publishers. 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) --:Cartesian Meditations:An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by Dorion Cairns. Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.Joseph J. Kockelmans.(1967)Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenological Psychology. Duquesne University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) --:“Phenomenology”for the Encyclopaedia Britannica ,Richard E. Palmer(tran.)Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 2(1971):77-90zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) --:Phenomenology and the crisis of philosophy:Philosophy as a rigorous science, and Philosophy and the crsis of European man. New York:Harper&Row, c1965.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gurwitsch,Aron. Studies in phenomenology and psychology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.1966.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Erazim Kohák, Idea and experience:Edmund Husserl’s Project of phenomenology in Ideas I. The university of Chicago, 1978.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paul Ricoeur, Husserl:an analysis of his Phenomenology. Edward G. Ballard and Lester E. Embree.(trans.)Northwestern University press, 1967.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Amedeo Giorgi.(ed.)Phenomenology and psychological Research, PA:Duquesne University Press,1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) A. Giorgi.“The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure”, in Journal of phenomenological psychology, Fall97, vol.28, Issue2, 235-261.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Giorgi, Amedeo. Phenomenology and psychological research. Duquesne University Press, c1985zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Giorgi, Amedeo, Psychology as a human science. New York : Harper & Row, c1970.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lester Embree.(ed.)Encyclopedia of phenomenology. Kluwer Academic publishers.1997,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Joesph J. Kockelmans. (1967)Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenological Psychology. Duquesne University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jean Petitot, Francisco J. Barela.(ed.) Natualizing phenomenology. Stanford university press. 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paul M. Churchland(1988). Matter and Consciousness:a contemporary introduction to the philosophy of mind, Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Searle, J. R. ﹙1992﹚. The Rediscovery of the Mind, Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press ,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Louis p. Pojman. What can we Know? an introduction to the theory of knowledge . Belmont, Calif. : Wadsworth Pub., c1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dermot Moran. Introduction to phenomenology. London ; New York : Routledge, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spiegelberg, Herbert. The phenomenological movement : a historical introduction. M. Nijhoff , 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kern, Iso.(1977).The three Ways to the transcendental Phenomenological Reduction in the Philosophy of Edmund Husserl, in F.Elliston&P. Mccormick(eds.,)Husserl:Expositons and Appraisals, University of Notre Dame Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Searle, J. R.﹙1992﹚. The Rediscovery of the Mind, Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press .zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡塞爾著,〈《邏輯研究》的任務和意義〉(1925),選自《胡塞爾選集》兩卷本,上海三聯書店,1997年,倪梁康選編,上卷。譯自:E.Husserl, HUSSERLIANA Bd. IX, “Phaenomenologishe Psychologie”, Den Haag 1968(《胡塞爾全集》第九卷,《現象學的心理學》)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡塞爾著,〈純粹現象學及其研究領域和方法〉(1917),選自《胡塞爾選集》上卷,上海三聯書店,1997年,倪梁康選編。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡塞爾著,〈現象學心理學和先驗現象學〉,(1927)《胡塞爾選集》兩卷本,上海三聯書店,1997年,倪梁康選編,上卷。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡塞爾著,〈先驗哲學的建構〉,(1928),《胡塞爾選集》兩卷本,上海三聯書店,1997年,倪梁康選編,上卷)。譯自:E. Husserl, “Amsterdamer Vortraege”, in: HUSSERLIANA Bd.IX, “Phaenomenologische Psychologie”, Den Haag 1968.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡塞爾著,〈現象學-不列顛大百科全書條目〉(1927)倪梁康譯(譯自德文版《胡塞爾全集》第九卷《現象學心理學)》),編錄於倪梁康選編《胡塞爾選集》,上海三聯書店,1996年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡塞爾著,《歐洲科學危機與超驗現象學》。王炳文譯,北京:商務印書館,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡塞爾著《純粹現象學與現象學哲學的觀念.第一卷:純粹現象學通論》,李幼蒸譯,北京:商務印書館,1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡塞爾著《笛卡爾式的沈思》,張廷國譯,中國城市出版社,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡塞爾著《現象學的觀念》,倪梁康譯,上海:上海譯文出版發行,1986年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡塞爾著《哲學作為嚴格科學》,北京:商務印書館,2002。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 汪文聖著,《胡塞爾與海德格》,台北:遠流,1995。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 畢普塞維克(Edo Pivcevic)著 《胡塞爾與現象學》,廖仁義譯,台北:桂冠,1986。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 倪梁康著,《現象學的始基》,廣州:廣東人民出版社,2004。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 倪梁康著,《胡塞爾現象學概念通釋》,北京:三聯,1999。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 倪梁康著,《現象學及其效應》,北京:三聯,1994。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 倪梁康著,《面對實事本身:現象學經典文選》,北京:東方出版社,2000。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 傅偉勳 著 《西洋哲學史》,台北:三民書局,1996。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 溤俊著 《開啟理性之門》,北京:中國人民大學出版社,2005。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳嘉明 主編 《實在、心靈與信念:當代美國哲學概論》,北京:人民出版社,2005。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 笛卡兒著 《第一哲學沉思集》,龐景仁譯,北京:商務印書館,1998年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 笛卡兒著 《我思故我在》,錢志純 編譯,台北:志文出版社,1972年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王溢嘉 譯輯 《生命與科學對話錄》,野鵝出版社,台北,1993zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 羅伊.波特(Roy Porter)著 巫毓全 譯 《瘋狂簡史》,台北,左岸,2002。。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 柏格森著,吳士棟譯,《時間與自由意志》,商務印書館,2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 羅伯.索科羅斯基著 李維倫譯《現象學十四講》,台北:心靈工坊,2004。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Searle, J. R.《心、腦與科學》,上海:上海譯文出版發行,1984年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 游淙祺著 〈現象學與超驗現象學〉發表於中山大學第一屆兩岸三地現象學學術會議。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 汪文聖,〈現象學、心理學與科學〉,〉,第三屆「倫理思想與道德關懷」學術研討會,淡江大學通識與核心課程。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡錚雲,〈現象學心理學的理論與應用(第二部份):實徵與詮釋兩種應用模式系譜上的對照〉,《應用心理研究》,第29期,2006,頁53-7o。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡錚雲;龔卓軍,〈現象學心理學〉,《應用心理研究》,29期,2006,頁33-34。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 游淙祺,〈現象學心理學與超驗現象學:從胡塞爾的脈絡來看〉,《應用心理研究》,29期,2006,頁35-52。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李維倫,〈論嬰兒的微笑〉,《應用心理研究》,29期,2006,頁131-156。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) zh_TW