| dc.contributor.advisor | 王世宗 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 曾珮娟 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 曾珮娟 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2005 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 17:10:26 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 17:10:26 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 17:10:26 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0891530112 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33601 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 歷史研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 89153011 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 94 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 「啟蒙運動」（the Enlightenment）最早由思想史研究提出，用以指稱西方文明史自「文藝復興」之人文主義的再現與世俗化、「宗教改革」之個人主義思想的促進與對教會權威的挑戰，以及「科學革命」之重視理性作為人類獲取知識來源以來的進一步發展。近年來，隨著歷史學分工與專業化發展，「啟蒙運動」也被廣泛運用至諸如社會史與文化史的論述中，成為社會文化運動或十八世紀之代稱，後進學者常習而不察。為此，本文從思想史研究取徑，藉著分析環繞「日耳曼啟蒙運動」的種種現象，包括其高等學術如何在科學革命潮流的影響下突破中古知識體系的框架與突破後的發展，以及當時神聖羅馬帝國內外社會、政治、經濟與文化環境對日耳曼啟蒙運動思想之發展與傳播的影響，試圖論證「日耳曼啟蒙運動」是否具有相異於其前後時代的獨特性質，以及此「日耳曼啟蒙運動」特質和「啟蒙運動」之間的關係。本文的結論是，在思想史取徑的分析下，「日耳曼啟蒙運動」在思想史脈絡上並無獨特表現，甚有違背啟蒙運動精神之處。它的公共活動現象雖然符合「啟蒙運動」的世俗性意義，卻往往理性化不足（而「獨重理性精神」應乃啟蒙運動的最重要特徵）；它的理性學術與新宗教論述雖肯定理性，卻堅持理性能與信仰調和一致，強調發揚理性應以不違信仰為前提；而所謂的「開明專制」，既以妥協通融、依附君王與政權為旨，自然不符合康德為「啟蒙」所下之定義：「啟蒙是人超脫於他自身所招致的未成年狀態。未成年狀態是無他人指導即無法使用理性的那種無能。」但若不以「日耳曼啟蒙運動」作為思想史名目，而僅觀察十八世紀日耳曼地區以「日耳曼啟蒙運動」(Aufklärung)為號召的社會文化變遷情況，則此段時期的歷史對日耳曼地區的整體文明進展，仍是具有其意義。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論第一節 何謂啟蒙運動一、啟蒙運動的文明史意義二、啟蒙運動發展的背景及其與西方知識體系發展的關係三、科學革命到啟蒙運動的轉變第二節 日耳曼啟蒙運動的發展背景一、復原與更新：三十年戰爭後的神聖羅馬帝國二、大學：日耳曼啟蒙運動的早期據點第二章 文明化的推動：直追西歐標準第一節 科學院及語文研究團體的出現 (1700-1760)一、國家型科學院的設立二、民族語文與理性精神的共同推廣第二節 出版與結社風氣的發展與公共議論的興起 (1770-1790)一、出版與結社風氣的發展二、公共議論現象的興起三、「何謂啟蒙／啟蒙運動」的公共討論四、「何謂啟蒙／啟蒙運動」討論的意義：文明提升的追求與理性精神的展現第三章 肯定理性更肯定信仰：日耳曼啟蒙運動的理性學術和理性宗教主張第一節 自然法系統與理性主義哲學一、普芬道夫與托馬西烏斯的自然法系統二、萊布尼茲與沃爾夫的理性主義哲學第二節 社會科學的出現一、哲學理論的政治運用二、政治經濟學：國富主義(Cameralism)第三節 日耳曼啟蒙運動的理性宗教主張一、沃爾夫主義：信仰與理性調和一致二、新教義派的聖經與教義批評第四節 信仰有賴理性：日耳曼啟蒙運動者的宗教態度一、學術理論與推廣宣傳的落差二、日耳曼啟蒙運動者對理性宗教論述的回應第四章 開明專制：日耳曼啟蒙運動者的政治理想第一節 寄託政治的日耳曼啟蒙運動一、思想自由與社會安全的辯證二、依附政權的文教發展三、肯定開明君王的公共議論傾向第二節 成也君王敗也君王的開明改革一、「開明」小邦君王的出現二、開明改革三、開明專制的實質結論徵引書目 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 91619 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 134444 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 133324 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 127719 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 356808 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 327320 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 446905 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 400618 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 198879 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 93924 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0891530112 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 日耳曼啟蒙運動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 啟蒙運動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 理性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 開明專制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 知識革命 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 十八世紀 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | 日耳曼啟蒙運動的特質 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 參考書 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. Edward Craig ed., Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York: Routledge, 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (1) Charles A. Corr, “Wolff Christian, 1679-1754,” Vol. 9, 776-786. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (2) Daniel Garber, “Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, 1646-1716,” Vol. 5, 541-562. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (3) Knud Haakonssen, “Thomasius (Thomas), Christian, 1655-1728,” Vol. 9, 376-380. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. Michel Delon ed., Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment, London: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 2001. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (1) Jean Mondot, “Germany,” Vol.1, 598-606. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. Alan Charles Kors ed., Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (1) Hans Erick Bödeker, “Journals, Newspapers, and Gazettes: Germany,” Vol. 2, 313-315. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (2) Laurence Brockliss, “Universities,” Vol. 4, 205-207. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (3) François Duchesneau, “Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von (1646-1716),” Vol. 2, 380-384. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (4) Ian Hunter, “Natural Law,” Vol. 3, 130-134. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (5) Manfred Kuehn, “Wolff, Christian (1679-1754),” Vol. 4, 263-266. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (6) Fania Oz-Salzberger, “Aufklärung,” Vol. 1, 100-103. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (7) Michael J. Seidler, “Pufendorf, Sanuel,” Vol. 3, 378-381. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (8) Simone Zurbuchen, “Thomasius, Christian,” Vol. 4, 161-162. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 資料集 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. James Schmidt ed., What is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-century Answers and Twentieth-century Questions, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (1) Carl Friedrich Bahrdt (translated by John Chrisyian Laursen), “On Freedom of the Press and Its Limits: For Consideration by Rulers, censors and Writers” (1787), 97-113. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (2) Johann Gottlieb Fiche (translated by Thomas E. Wartenberg), “Reclamation of the Freedom of Thought from the Princes of Europe, who Have Oppressed It until Now,” (1793), 119-142. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (3) Immanuel Kant (translated by James Schmidt), “An answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?”(1784), 58-64. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (4) Ernst Ferdinand Klein (translated by John Christian Laursen), “On Freedom of thought and of the Press: For Princes, Ministers, and Writers” (1784), 87-96. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (5) Friedrich Karl von Moser (translated by John Christian Laursen), “True and False Political Enlightenment,”(1792), 212-216. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (6) J. K. W. Möhsen (translated by James Schmidt), “What Is to be Done Toward the Enlightenment of the Citizenry,”(1783), 49-52. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (7) Andreas Riem (translated by Jane Kneller), “On Enlightenment: Is It and Could It Be Dangerous to the State, to Region, or Dangerous in General? A Word to Be Heeded by Princes, Statesmen, and Clergy” (1788), 168-188. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (8) Johann Heinrich Tieftrunk (translated by Arthur Hirsh), “On the Influence of Enlightenment on Revolutions,”(1794), 217-224. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (9) Christoph Martin Wieland (translated by Kevin Paul Geiman and James Schmidt), “A Couple of Gold Nuggets, from the… Watepaper, or Six Amswers to Six Questions,” (1789), 78-84. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (10) Moses Mendelssohn (translated by James Schmidt), “On the Question: What Is Enlightenment?”(1784), 53-57. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. Paul Hyland ed., The Enlightenment: A sourcebook and reader,New York: Routledge, 2003. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (1) Frederick II, “Essay on the forms of Government,” (1777), 173-175. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 專書 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. Derek Beales, Joseph II: In the Shadow of Maria Theresa 1741-1780, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. Richard van Dülmen, The Society of the Enlightenment, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. Klaus Epstein, The Genesis of German Conservatism, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1975. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4. John G. Gagliardo, Germany under the Old Regime, London: Longman, 1991, 177-180. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5. John G. Gagliardo, Reich and Nation: The Holy Roman Empire as Idea and Reality, 1763-1806, London: Bloomington, 1980. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6. Peter Gay, The Enlightenment: An Interpretation, The Rise of Modern Paganism, New York: Alfred. A. Knopf, 1967. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7. Dorinda Outram, The Enlightenment, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8. Thomas P. Saine, The Problem of Being Modern, or, The German Pursuit of Enlightenment from Leibniz to the French Revolution, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1997. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9. Rudolf Vierhaus (translated by Jonathan B. Knudsen), Germany in the Age of Absolutism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 專文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. Derek Beales, “Love and the Empire: Maria Theresa and her co-regents,” in Robert Oresko, G. C. Gibbs, and H.M. Scott ed., Royal and Republican Sovereignty in Early Modern Europe: Essays in Memory of Ragnhild Hatton, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 479-499. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. Günter Birtsch (translated by Arthur Hirsh), “The Berlin Wednesday Society,” in James Schmidt ed., What is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-century Answers and Twentieth-century Questions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), 235-252. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. T. C. W. Blanning, “The Enlightenment in Catholic Germany,” in Roy Porter and Mikulas Teich ed., The Enlightenment in National Context (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 118-126. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4. T. C. W. Blanning, “Frederick the Great and Enlightened Absolutism,” in H. M. Scott ed., Enlightened Absolutism: Reform and Reformers in Later Eighteenth-century Europe, (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990), 265-288. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5. Charles Ingrao, “The Problem of ‘Enlightened Absolutism’ and the German States,” Journal of Modern History 58, suppl. (1986), S161-180. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6. Charles Ingrao, “The Smaller German States,” in H. M. Scott ed., Enlightened Absolutism: Reform and Reformers in Later Eighteenth-century Europe, (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990), 221-243. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7. H. B. Nisbet, “‘Was ist Aufklärung?’: The Concept of Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Germany,” in Journal of European Studies 12.2 (1982): 77-95. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8. Marc Raeff, “The Well-Ordered Police State and the Development of Modernity in Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century Europe: An attempt at a Comparative Perspective,” American Historical Review 80 (1975):1221-1243. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9. James Schmidt, “Introduction: What Is Enlightenment? A Question, Its Context, and Some Consequences,” in James Schmidt ed., What is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-century Answers and Twentieth-century Questions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), 1-44. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10. H. M. Scott, “Introduction: The Problem of Enlightened Absolutism,” in H. M. Scott ed., Enlightened Absolutism: Reform and Reformers in Later Eighteenth-century Europe, (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990), 1-35. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11. H. M. Scott, “Reform in the Habsburg Monarchy, 1740-90, in H. M. Scott ed., Enlightened Absolutism: Reform and Reformers in Later Eighteenth-century Europe, (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990),145-187. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12. Richard Tuck, “The ‘Modern’ Theory of Natural Law,” in Anthony Pagden, The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe (New York : Cambridge University Press, 1987), 99-119. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13. James Tully, “Editor’s Introduction,” in Samuel Pufendorf’s On the Duty of Man and Citizen, edited by Michael Silverthrorne (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), xiv-xxxvii. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14. Joachim Whaley, “The Protestant Enlightenment in Germany,” in Roy Porter and Mikulas Teich ed., The Enlightenment in National Context (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 106-117. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15. Eberhard Weis, “Enlightenment and Absolutism in the Holy Roman Empire: Thoughts on Enlightened Absolutism in Germany,” Journal of Modern History 58, suppl. (1986), S181-197. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文書目 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. 王世宗，《現代世界的形成：文明終極意義的探求》，台北：三民，2003。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. 王曾才，《西洋近世史》，台北：正中書局，1976。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. 楊豫，《西洋史學史》，台北：雲龍出版社，1998。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4. Ernst Cassirer著，李日章譯，《啟蒙運動的哲學》，台北：聯經，1984。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5. Peter Burke著，賈士蘅譯，《知識社會史》，台北：麥田，2003。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6. Peter Hanns Reill, “Science” in Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment, New York: Facts On File, 1996. 劉北成、王皖強編譯，《啟蒙運動百科全書》，上海：上海人民，2004。 | zh_TW |
