dc.contributor.advisor | 翁堃嵐 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 洪若雅 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | 洪若雅 | zh_TW |
dc.date (日期) | 2005 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 18-Sep-2009 10:57:00 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 18-Sep-2009 10:57:00 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 18-Sep-2009 10:57:00 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0093255003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34695 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 財政研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 93255003 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 94 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 傳統探討策略性出口貿易政策的文獻忽略了租稅以及租稅逃漏等議題對貿易政策的影響,因此本文主要的目的是探討當政府對廠商課利潤稅,且廠商可藉浮報成本的方式逃漏稅額的情況下,考慮逃漏稅問題對傳統貿易理論所造成的影響。本文第二章發現:在三國兩廠商的出口貿易模型下,最適的出口補貼率與浮報比例、利潤稅稅率呈負相關,所以最適的出口補貼率會較傳統結果低,當浮報比例或是利潤稅稅率相當高的時候,最適的出口貿易政策可能由出口補貼變為課徵出口稅;此外由於本國國內廠商僅有一家,最適的出口貿易政策即為第一優的政策,所以本國的社會福利並不受本國的利潤稅稅率及逃漏稅比例的影響。本文第三章發現:兩國間的最適出口補貼率差距決定於成本差異與租稅逃漏差異兩種效果,傳統低成本高補貼的結論應該視兩種效果的大小而定,特別當租稅逃漏差異效果相當大時,會讓成本較低的國家給予廠商較高的補貼,使得低成本高補貼的結論產生反轉。本文第四章將模型延伸到多家廠商的情況,文中發現:如果本國廠商家數比外國廠商家數多上大於一家的數量,則最適的出口政策仍為對廠商課徵出口稅,且稅率會比傳統的結果高;如果本國廠商的家數少於外國廠商家數加上一家的數量時,此時必須視租稅逃漏的效果大小而定,當租稅逃漏的效果相當大時,最適的出口政策將反轉為課徵出口稅。此外在多家廠商之下,由於利潤稅稅率與逃漏稅比例的增加,會使產業集中度降低,因而讓社會福利下降。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………1 第二章 三國兩廠商…………………………………………………………………4 第一節 前言………………………………………………………………4 第二節 模型的假設與建立………………………………………………5 第三節 廠商的最適決策…………………………………………………7 第四節 政府的最適決策………………………………………………..10 第五節 結論……………………………………………………………..13 第三章 成本差異與最適出口貿易政策…………………………………………..15 第一節 前言…………………………………………………………..15 第二節 廠商的最適決策……………………………………………..17 第三節 政府的最適決策……………………………………………..18 第四節 結論…………………………………………………………..20第四章 廠商家數、成本差異與最適出口貿易政策………………………………22 第一節 前言……………………………………………………………..22 第二節 基本模型………………………………………………………..23 第三節 廠商的最適決策………………………………………………..24 第四節 政府的最適決策………………………………………………..27 第五節 結論……………………………………………………………..31第五章 總結………………………………………………………………………..32參考文獻…..................................................................................................................34圖次圖一 補貼率、利潤稅稅率及逃漏稅對邊際收入及邊際成本的影響.....................9 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 42490 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 62039 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 48120 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 93419 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 167980 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 151984 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 173957 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 67245 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 49927 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093255003 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 逃漏稅 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 最適出口貿易政策 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 成本差異 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 廠商家數 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | 外生的逃漏稅與最適出口貿易政策 | zh_TW |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林燕淑、黃鴻 (1998),「最適出口補貼與空間競爭」,《經濟論文》,26(1),1-18。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 郭虹瑩、翁堃嵐 (2005),「外生的租稅逃漏與最適出口貿易政策」,投稿中。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 郭虹瑩、翁堃嵐 (2006),「公司稅、租稅逃漏與最適出口貿易政策」,投稿中。Banyopadhyay, S. (1997), “Demand Elasticities, Asymmetry and Strategic Trade | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Policy,” Journal of International Economics, 42, 167-177. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brander, J.A. and B.J. Spencer (1985), “Export Subsidies and International Market | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Share Rivalry,” Journal of International Economics, 18, 83-100. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brander, J.A. (1995), “Strategic Trade Policy,” in G. Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds): Handbook of International Economics, 15, 313-321. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chang, W. Y. and C. C. Lai and J. J. Chang (1999), “Imperfect Competition and Tax | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Evasion,” Public Finance Review, 27(3), 371-381. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chu, C.Y. (1990 a), “A Model of Income Tax Evasion with Venal Tax Officials,” | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Public Finance, 45, 392-408. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chu, C.Y. (1990 b), “Plea Bargaining with the IRS,” Journal of Public Economics, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 41, 319-333. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Collie, D.R. and D. De Meza (2003), “Comparative Advantage and the Pursuit of | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Strategic Trade Policy,” Economics Letters, 81, 279-283. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | De Meza, D. (1986), “Export Subsidies and High Productivity: Cause or Effect?” | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Canadian Journal of Economics, 19(2), 347-350. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dixit, A. (1984), “International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries,” Economic | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Journal, 94, 1-16. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Eaton, J. and G. M. Grossman (1986), “Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Oligopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 383-406. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gaudet, G. and S. W. Salant (1991), “Increasing the Profits of a Subset of Firms in | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Oligopoly Models with Strategies Substitutes,” American Economic Review, 81, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 658-665. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hahn, F. (1962), “The Stability of the Cournot Oligopoly Solution,” Review of | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Economic Studies, 32, 329-331. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kreutzer, D. and D. R. Lee (1986), “On Taxation and Understand Monopoly Profits,” | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | National Tax Journal, 39, 241-243. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Krishna, K. and M. Thursby (1991), “Optimal Policies with Strategic Distortions,” | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Journal of International Economics, 31, 291-308. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lai, C. C. and W. Y. Chang (1988), “Tax Evasion and Tax Collections: An Aggregate | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Demand-Aggregate Supply Analysis,” Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 43, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 138-146. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Leahy, D. and M. Catia (2001), “Strategic Trade Policy with Heterogeneous Costs,” Bulletin of Economic Research, 53 (3), 177-182. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Long, N. V. and A. Soubeyran (1997), “Cost Heterogeneity, Industry Concentration | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | and Strategic Trade Policies,” Journal of International Economics, 43, 207-220. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mai, C. C. and H. Hwang (1988), “Optimal Export and Marginal Cost Differentials,” | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Economics Letters, 27, 279-282. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Myles, G. D. (1995), Public Economics, New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Neary, J. P. (1994), “Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Governments Help Winners or Losers?” Journal of International Economics, 37, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 197-218. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Peacock, A. and G. K. Shaw (1982), “Tax Evasion and Tax Revenue Loss,” Public | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Finance/Finances Publiques, 37, 269-278. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ricketts, M. (1984), “On the Simple Macroeconomics of Tax Evasion: An Elaboration | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | of the Peacock-Shaw Approach,” Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 39, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 420-424. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Salant, S. (1984), “Export Subsidies as Instruments of Economic and Foreign | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Policies,” mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Michigan. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spencer, B. J. and R. W. Jones (1992), “Vertical Foreclosure and International Trade | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Policy,” The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 153-170. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zhou, D. and B. J. Spencer and I. Vertinsky (2002), “Strategic Trade Policy with | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Endogenous Choice of Quality and Asymmetric Costs,” Journal of International | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Economics, 56, 205-232. | zh_TW |