學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 外生的逃漏稅與最適出口貿易政策
作者 洪若雅
貢獻者 翁堃嵐
洪若雅
關鍵詞 逃漏稅
最適出口貿易政策
成本差異
廠商家數
日期 2005
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 10:57:00 (UTC+8)
摘要 傳統探討策略性出口貿易政策的文獻忽略了租稅以及租稅逃漏等議題對貿易政策的影響,因此本文主要的目的是探討當政府對廠商課利潤稅,且廠商可藉浮報成本的方式逃漏稅額的情況下,考慮逃漏稅問題對傳統貿易理論所造成的影響。本文第二章發現:在三國兩廠商的出口貿易模型下,最適的出口補貼率與浮報比例、利潤稅稅率呈負相關,所以最適的出口補貼率會較傳統結果低,當浮報比例或是利潤稅稅率相當高的時候,最適的出口貿易政策可能由出口補貼變為課徵出口稅;此外由於本國國內廠商僅有一家,最適的出口貿易政策即為第一優的政策,所以本國的社會福利並不受本國的利潤稅稅率及逃漏稅比例的影響。本文第三章發現:兩國間的最適出口補貼率差距決定於成本差異與租稅逃漏差異兩種效果,傳統低成本高補貼的結論應該視兩種效果的大小而定,特別當租稅逃漏差異效果相當大時,會讓成本較低的國家給予廠商較高的補貼,使得低成本高補貼的結論產生反轉。本文第四章將模型延伸到多家廠商的情況,文中發現:如果本國廠商家數比外國廠商家數多上大於一家的數量,則最適的出口政策仍為對廠商課徵出口稅,且稅率會比傳統的結果高;如果本國廠商的家數少於外國廠商家數加上一家的數量時,此時必須視租稅逃漏的效果大小而定,當租稅逃漏的效果相當大時,最適的出口政策將反轉為課徵出口稅。此外在多家廠商之下,由於利潤稅稅率與逃漏稅比例的增加,會使產業集中度降低,因而讓社會福利下降。
參考文獻 林燕淑、黃鴻 (1998),「最適出口補貼與空間競爭」,《經濟論文》,26(1),1-18。
郭虹瑩、翁堃嵐 (2005),「外生的租稅逃漏與最適出口貿易政策」,投稿中。
郭虹瑩、翁堃嵐 (2006),「公司稅、租稅逃漏與最適出口貿易政策」,投稿中。Banyopadhyay, S. (1997), “Demand Elasticities, Asymmetry and Strategic Trade
Policy,” Journal of International Economics, 42, 167-177.
Brander, J.A. and B.J. Spencer (1985), “Export Subsidies and International Market
Share Rivalry,” Journal of International Economics, 18, 83-100.
Brander, J.A. (1995), “Strategic Trade Policy,” in G. Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds): Handbook of International Economics, 15, 313-321.
Chang, W. Y. and C. C. Lai and J. J. Chang (1999), “Imperfect Competition and Tax
Evasion,” Public Finance Review, 27(3), 371-381.
Chu, C.Y. (1990 a), “A Model of Income Tax Evasion with Venal Tax Officials,”
Public Finance, 45, 392-408.
Chu, C.Y. (1990 b), “Plea Bargaining with the IRS,” Journal of Public Economics,
41, 319-333.
Collie, D.R. and D. De Meza (2003), “Comparative Advantage and the Pursuit of
Strategic Trade Policy,” Economics Letters, 81, 279-283.
De Meza, D. (1986), “Export Subsidies and High Productivity: Cause or Effect?”
Canadian Journal of Economics, 19(2), 347-350.
Dixit, A. (1984), “International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries,” Economic
Journal, 94, 1-16.
Eaton, J. and G. M. Grossman (1986), “Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy under
Oligopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 383-406.
Gaudet, G. and S. W. Salant (1991), “Increasing the Profits of a Subset of Firms in
Oligopoly Models with Strategies Substitutes,” American Economic Review, 81,
658-665.
Hahn, F. (1962), “The Stability of the Cournot Oligopoly Solution,” Review of
Economic Studies, 32, 329-331.
Kreutzer, D. and D. R. Lee (1986), “On Taxation and Understand Monopoly Profits,”
National Tax Journal, 39, 241-243.
Krishna, K. and M. Thursby (1991), “Optimal Policies with Strategic Distortions,”
Journal of International Economics, 31, 291-308.
Lai, C. C. and W. Y. Chang (1988), “Tax Evasion and Tax Collections: An Aggregate
Demand-Aggregate Supply Analysis,” Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 43,
138-146.
Leahy, D. and M. Catia (2001), “Strategic Trade Policy with Heterogeneous Costs,” Bulletin of Economic Research, 53 (3), 177-182.
Long, N. V. and A. Soubeyran (1997), “Cost Heterogeneity, Industry Concentration
and Strategic Trade Policies,” Journal of International Economics, 43, 207-220.
Mai, C. C. and H. Hwang (1988), “Optimal Export and Marginal Cost Differentials,”
Economics Letters, 27, 279-282.
Myles, G. D. (1995), Public Economics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Neary, J. P. (1994), “Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should
Governments Help Winners or Losers?” Journal of International Economics, 37,
197-218.
Peacock, A. and G. K. Shaw (1982), “Tax Evasion and Tax Revenue Loss,” Public
Finance/Finances Publiques, 37, 269-278.
Ricketts, M. (1984), “On the Simple Macroeconomics of Tax Evasion: An Elaboration
of the Peacock-Shaw Approach,” Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 39,
420-424.
Salant, S. (1984), “Export Subsidies as Instruments of Economic and Foreign
Policies,” mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Michigan.
Spencer, B. J. and R. W. Jones (1992), “Vertical Foreclosure and International Trade
Policy,” The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 153-170.
Zhou, D. and B. J. Spencer and I. Vertinsky (2002), “Strategic Trade Policy with
Endogenous Choice of Quality and Asymmetric Costs,” Journal of International
Economics, 56, 205-232.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政研究所
93255003
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093255003
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 翁堃嵐zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 洪若雅zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 洪若雅zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 10:57:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 10:57:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 10:57:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0093255003en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34695-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93255003zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 傳統探討策略性出口貿易政策的文獻忽略了租稅以及租稅逃漏等議題對貿易政策的影響,因此本文主要的目的是探討當政府對廠商課利潤稅,且廠商可藉浮報成本的方式逃漏稅額的情況下,考慮逃漏稅問題對傳統貿易理論所造成的影響。本文第二章發現:在三國兩廠商的出口貿易模型下,最適的出口補貼率與浮報比例、利潤稅稅率呈負相關,所以最適的出口補貼率會較傳統結果低,當浮報比例或是利潤稅稅率相當高的時候,最適的出口貿易政策可能由出口補貼變為課徵出口稅;此外由於本國國內廠商僅有一家,最適的出口貿易政策即為第一優的政策,所以本國的社會福利並不受本國的利潤稅稅率及逃漏稅比例的影響。本文第三章發現:兩國間的最適出口補貼率差距決定於成本差異與租稅逃漏差異兩種效果,傳統低成本高補貼的結論應該視兩種效果的大小而定,特別當租稅逃漏差異效果相當大時,會讓成本較低的國家給予廠商較高的補貼,使得低成本高補貼的結論產生反轉。本文第四章將模型延伸到多家廠商的情況,文中發現:如果本國廠商家數比外國廠商家數多上大於一家的數量,則最適的出口政策仍為對廠商課徵出口稅,且稅率會比傳統的結果高;如果本國廠商的家數少於外國廠商家數加上一家的數量時,此時必須視租稅逃漏的效果大小而定,當租稅逃漏的效果相當大時,最適的出口政策將反轉為課徵出口稅。此外在多家廠商之下,由於利潤稅稅率與逃漏稅比例的增加,會使產業集中度降低,因而讓社會福利下降。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………1
第二章 三國兩廠商…………………………………………………………………4
第一節 前言………………………………………………………………4
第二節 模型的假設與建立………………………………………………5
第三節 廠商的最適決策…………………………………………………7
第四節 政府的最適決策………………………………………………..10
第五節 結論……………………………………………………………..13
第三章 成本差異與最適出口貿易政策…………………………………………..15
第一節 前言…………………………………………………………..15
第二節 廠商的最適決策……………………………………………..17
第三節 政府的最適決策……………………………………………..18
第四節 結論…………………………………………………………..20
第四章 廠商家數、成本差異與最適出口貿易政策………………………………22
第一節 前言……………………………………………………………..22
第二節 基本模型………………………………………………………..23
第三節 廠商的最適決策………………………………………………..24
第四節 政府的最適決策………………………………………………..27
第五節 結論……………………………………………………………..31
第五章 總結………………………………………………………………………..32
參考文獻…..................................................................................................................34
圖次
圖一 補貼率、利潤稅稅率及逃漏稅對邊際收入及邊際成本的影響.....................9
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 42490 bytes-
dc.format.extent 62039 bytes-
dc.format.extent 48120 bytes-
dc.format.extent 93419 bytes-
dc.format.extent 167980 bytes-
dc.format.extent 151984 bytes-
dc.format.extent 173957 bytes-
dc.format.extent 67245 bytes-
dc.format.extent 49927 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093255003en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 逃漏稅zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 最適出口貿易政策zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 成本差異zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 廠商家數zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 外生的逃漏稅與最適出口貿易政策zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林燕淑、黃鴻 (1998),「最適出口補貼與空間競爭」,《經濟論文》,26(1),1-18。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭虹瑩、翁堃嵐 (2005),「外生的租稅逃漏與最適出口貿易政策」,投稿中。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭虹瑩、翁堃嵐 (2006),「公司稅、租稅逃漏與最適出口貿易政策」,投稿中。Banyopadhyay, S. (1997), “Demand Elasticities, Asymmetry and Strategic Tradezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Policy,” Journal of International Economics, 42, 167-177.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brander, J.A. and B.J. Spencer (1985), “Export Subsidies and International Marketzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Share Rivalry,” Journal of International Economics, 18, 83-100.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brander, J.A. (1995), “Strategic Trade Policy,” in G. Grossman and K. Rogoff (eds): Handbook of International Economics, 15, 313-321.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chang, W. Y. and C. C. Lai and J. J. Chang (1999), “Imperfect Competition and Taxzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Evasion,” Public Finance Review, 27(3), 371-381.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chu, C.Y. (1990 a), “A Model of Income Tax Evasion with Venal Tax Officials,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Public Finance, 45, 392-408.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chu, C.Y. (1990 b), “Plea Bargaining with the IRS,” Journal of Public Economics,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 41, 319-333.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Collie, D.R. and D. De Meza (2003), “Comparative Advantage and the Pursuit ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strategic Trade Policy,” Economics Letters, 81, 279-283.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) De Meza, D. (1986), “Export Subsidies and High Productivity: Cause or Effect?”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Canadian Journal of Economics, 19(2), 347-350.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dixit, A. (1984), “International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries,” Economiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal, 94, 1-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eaton, J. and G. M. Grossman (1986), “Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy underzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oligopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 383-406.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gaudet, G. and S. W. Salant (1991), “Increasing the Profits of a Subset of Firms inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oligopoly Models with Strategies Substitutes,” American Economic Review, 81,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 658-665.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hahn, F. (1962), “The Stability of the Cournot Oligopoly Solution,” Review ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economic Studies, 32, 329-331.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kreutzer, D. and D. R. Lee (1986), “On Taxation and Understand Monopoly Profits,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) National Tax Journal, 39, 241-243.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krishna, K. and M. Thursby (1991), “Optimal Policies with Strategic Distortions,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of International Economics, 31, 291-308.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lai, C. C. and W. Y. Chang (1988), “Tax Evasion and Tax Collections: An Aggregatezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Demand-Aggregate Supply Analysis,” Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 43,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 138-146.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leahy, D. and M. Catia (2001), “Strategic Trade Policy with Heterogeneous Costs,” Bulletin of Economic Research, 53 (3), 177-182.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Long, N. V. and A. Soubeyran (1997), “Cost Heterogeneity, Industry Concentrationzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and Strategic Trade Policies,” Journal of International Economics, 43, 207-220.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mai, C. C. and H. Hwang (1988), “Optimal Export and Marginal Cost Differentials,”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economics Letters, 27, 279-282.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Myles, G. D. (1995), Public Economics, New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Neary, J. P. (1994), “Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Shouldzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Governments Help Winners or Losers?” Journal of International Economics, 37,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 197-218.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peacock, A. and G. K. Shaw (1982), “Tax Evasion and Tax Revenue Loss,” Publiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Finance/Finances Publiques, 37, 269-278.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ricketts, M. (1984), “On the Simple Macroeconomics of Tax Evasion: An Elaborationzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) of the Peacock-Shaw Approach,” Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 39,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 420-424.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Salant, S. (1984), “Export Subsidies as Instruments of Economic and Foreignzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Policies,” mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Michigan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spencer, B. J. and R. W. Jones (1992), “Vertical Foreclosure and International Tradezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Policy,” The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 153-170.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zhou, D. and B. J. Spencer and I. Vertinsky (2002), “Strategic Trade Policy withzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Endogenous Choice of Quality and Asymmetric Costs,” Journal of Internationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economics, 56, 205-232.zh_TW