學術產出-Theses

題名 租稅歸宿與最適公共財提供條件-租稅競爭模型
Tax Incidence and the Optimal Provision of Local Public Goods-Tax Competition Model
作者 陳佳鈴
Chen, Chia-Ling
貢獻者 張勝文
Chang, Sheng-Wen
陳佳鈴
Chen, Chia-Ling
關鍵詞 租稅競爭
Tiebout 模型
最適公共財提供條件
租稅歸宿
日期 2006
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 10:57:40 (UTC+8)
摘要   本文以Tiebout(1956)及Zodrow與Mieszkowski(1986)為基礎,利用地方政府間之租稅競爭行為,結合租稅負擔與支出性質,探討地方公共財最適提供條件與資本稅歸宿條件。
 租稅競爭行為通常只以課徵資本稅作為分析對象,但資本稅因存在扭曲性質,故政府提供之公共財數量必然低於最適水準。而本文引入政府提供不同類型公共財搭配課徵資本稅之觀點,利用要素彈性解釋地方公共財最適提供條件。本文發現在基本模型(僅考慮資本要素)中,消費性公共財提供數量會低於最適水準,生產性公共財則可能為提供不足或過度提供,主要原因取決於生產性公共財對生產動力之影響是否足以彌補資本稅帶來之扭曲性,而在延伸模型(同時考慮資本及勞動要素)中,消費性及生產性公共財雖仍提供不足,但消費性公共財較基本模型接近最適數量,而生產性公共財則較遠離最適數量。
  由於廠商及居民在租稅制度之機制下皆有可能承擔稅負,新觀點之歸宿理論認為課徵單一資本稅因不存在替代效果,故稅負全部由資本所有者承擔,而本文則以政府提供不同類型公共財之觀點,分析資本稅競爭環境之最後稅負承擔者,本文發現地方政府間租稅競爭行為會使資本稅發生轉嫁現象,且稅負由資本所有者及使用者共同承擔。
當政府可透過支出政策,藉由提供吸引消費者遷入之消費性公共財或增加廠商生產動力之生產性公共財時,本文認為因公共支出成本係由使用之居民或廠商負擔,故資本稅具有使用者付費之受益性質。另本文發現在均衡時,於同轄區內定居之消費者及投資之廠商對政府公共支出品質與稅負具有相同偏好,此係政府、廠商與消費者運用自我選擇機制而使彼此間行為產生相互配合之現象,因而可滿足Tiebout模型強調之區分機制。
參考文獻 李顯峰與黃惠雯(1995),「地方政府間租稅競爭與地方公共財供給之研究」,《中興大學財政所碩士論文》。
楊宗翰(2002),「人口移動、租稅競爭及所得重分配政策之研究」,《臺北大學財政所碩士論文》。
劉其昌(1995),《財政學》,臺北:五南。
Aaron, Henry J. (1975), Who Pays the Property Tax:A New View, Washington:Brookings Institution.
Bayindir-Upmann, T. (1998), “Two Games of Interjurisdictional Competition When Local Governments Provide Industrial Public Goods,” International Tax and Public Finance, 5, 471-487.
Braid, Ralph M. (1996), “Symmetric Tax Competition with Multiple Jurisdictions in Each Metropolitan Area,” American Economics Review, 86, 1279-1290.
Bucovetsky, S. (1991), “Asymmetric Tax Competition,” Journal of Urban Economics, 30, 167-181.
Burbidge, John B. and Gordon M. Myers(1994), “Population Mobility and Capital Tax Competition,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24, 441-459.
Fisher, Ronald C. (1996), State and Local Public Finance, Chicago:Irwin.
Haufler, Andreas (2001), Taxation in a Global Economy, New York:Cambridge University Press.
Keen, Michael and Maurice Marchand (1997), “Fiscal Competition and the Pattern of Public Spending,” Journal of Public Economics, 66, 33-53.
Matsumoto, Mutsumi (2000), “A Note on the Composition of Public Expenditure under Capital Tax Competition,” International Taxation and Public Finance, 7, 697-697.
Oates, Wallace E. (1972), Fiscal Federalism, New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Rosen, Harvey S. (2005), Public Finance, New York:McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Tannenwald, R. (2001), “Tax Competiton,” Encyclopedia of Taxation and Fiscal Policy, 433-436.
Tiebout, Charles M. (1956), “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.
Wildasin, David E. and John Douglas Wilson (1996), “Imperfect Mobility and Local Government Behaviour in an Overlapping-Generations Model,” “Journal of Public Economics, 60, 177-198.
Wildasin, David E. (1989), “Interjurisdictional Capital Mobility:Fiscal Externality and a Corrective Subsidy,” Journal of Urban Economics, 25, 193-212.
Wilson, John Douglas (1999), “Theories of Tax Competition,” National Tax Journal, 52, 269-304.
Zodrow, George R. and Peter Mieszkowski (1986), “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods,” Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356-370.
Zodrow, George R. (2001), “The Property Tax as a Capital Tax:A Room with Three Views,” National Tax Journal, 54, 139-156.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政研究所
93255015
95
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093255015
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 張勝文zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chang, Sheng-Wenen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳佳鈴zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Chia-Lingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳佳鈴zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Chia-Lingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 10:57:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 10:57:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 10:57:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0093255015en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34700-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93255015zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)   本文以Tiebout(1956)及Zodrow與Mieszkowski(1986)為基礎,利用地方政府間之租稅競爭行為,結合租稅負擔與支出性質,探討地方公共財最適提供條件與資本稅歸宿條件。
 租稅競爭行為通常只以課徵資本稅作為分析對象,但資本稅因存在扭曲性質,故政府提供之公共財數量必然低於最適水準。而本文引入政府提供不同類型公共財搭配課徵資本稅之觀點,利用要素彈性解釋地方公共財最適提供條件。本文發現在基本模型(僅考慮資本要素)中,消費性公共財提供數量會低於最適水準,生產性公共財則可能為提供不足或過度提供,主要原因取決於生產性公共財對生產動力之影響是否足以彌補資本稅帶來之扭曲性,而在延伸模型(同時考慮資本及勞動要素)中,消費性及生產性公共財雖仍提供不足,但消費性公共財較基本模型接近最適數量,而生產性公共財則較遠離最適數量。
  由於廠商及居民在租稅制度之機制下皆有可能承擔稅負,新觀點之歸宿理論認為課徵單一資本稅因不存在替代效果,故稅負全部由資本所有者承擔,而本文則以政府提供不同類型公共財之觀點,分析資本稅競爭環境之最後稅負承擔者,本文發現地方政府間租稅競爭行為會使資本稅發生轉嫁現象,且稅負由資本所有者及使用者共同承擔。
當政府可透過支出政策,藉由提供吸引消費者遷入之消費性公共財或增加廠商生產動力之生產性公共財時,本文認為因公共支出成本係由使用之居民或廠商負擔,故資本稅具有使用者付費之受益性質。另本文發現在均衡時,於同轄區內定居之消費者及投資之廠商對政府公共支出品質與稅負具有相同偏好,此係政府、廠商與消費者運用自我選擇機制而使彼此間行為產生相互配合之現象,因而可滿足Tiebout模型強調之區分機制。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的......................................1
第二節 文獻回顧...........................................2
第三節 研究方法及架構......................................7
第二章 租稅競爭-基本模型
第一節  模型假設............................................9
第二節 模型結果-政府提供公共財之最適條件....................10
第三節 模型結果-資本稅歸宿條件.............................15
第四節 小結..............................................19
第三章 租稅競爭-延伸模型
第一節 模型假設...........................................20
第二節 加入可移動勞動要素時,政府提供公共財之最適條件.........21
第三節 加入可移動勞動要素時,資本稅歸宿條件..................28
第四節 小結..............................................30
第四章 結論與建議
第一節 研究發現...........................................31
第二節 研究建議...........................................33
附錄......................................................41
參考文獻..................................................48
圖 目 次
圖一 研究流程及架構圖.......................................8
表 目 次
表一 政府課徵資本稅時,最適公共財提供及資本稅歸宿條件....35
表二 租稅競爭現象對生產要素影響之分析........................37
表三 Zodrow與Mieszkowski(1986)、基本模型及延伸模型之比較...39
附 錄 目 次
模型A 政府僅提供消費性公共財......................41
模型B 政府僅提供生產性公共財................................42
模型C 政府同時提供消費性及生產性公共財.......................43
模型A-1 加入可移動勞動要素-政府僅提供消費性公共財............44
模型B-1加入可移動勞動要素-政府僅提供生產性公共財.........45
模型C-1加入可移動勞動要素-政府同時提供消費性及生產性公共財.....46
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 44048 bytes-
dc.format.extent 84749 bytes-
dc.format.extent 68612 bytes-
dc.format.extent 71189 bytes-
dc.format.extent 157555 bytes-
dc.format.extent 156868 bytes-
dc.format.extent 157136 bytes-
dc.format.extent 129526 bytes-
dc.format.extent 80605 bytes-
dc.format.extent 67775 bytes-
dc.format.extent 69790 bytes-
dc.format.extent 110606 bytes-
dc.format.extent 50334 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093255015en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 租稅競爭zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Tiebout 模型zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 最適公共財提供條件zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 租稅歸宿zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 租稅歸宿與最適公共財提供條件-租稅競爭模型zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Tax Incidence and the Optimal Provision of Local Public Goods-Tax Competition Modelen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李顯峰與黃惠雯(1995),「地方政府間租稅競爭與地方公共財供給之研究」,《中興大學財政所碩士論文》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊宗翰(2002),「人口移動、租稅競爭及所得重分配政策之研究」,《臺北大學財政所碩士論文》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉其昌(1995),《財政學》,臺北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aaron, Henry J. (1975), Who Pays the Property Tax:A New View, Washington:Brookings Institution.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bayindir-Upmann, T. (1998), “Two Games of Interjurisdictional Competition When Local Governments Provide Industrial Public Goods,” International Tax and Public Finance, 5, 471-487.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Braid, Ralph M. (1996), “Symmetric Tax Competition with Multiple Jurisdictions in Each Metropolitan Area,” American Economics Review, 86, 1279-1290.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bucovetsky, S. (1991), “Asymmetric Tax Competition,” Journal of Urban Economics, 30, 167-181.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burbidge, John B. and Gordon M. Myers(1994), “Population Mobility and Capital Tax Competition,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24, 441-459.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fisher, Ronald C. (1996), State and Local Public Finance, Chicago:Irwin.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haufler, Andreas (2001), Taxation in a Global Economy, New York:Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keen, Michael and Maurice Marchand (1997), “Fiscal Competition and the Pattern of Public Spending,” Journal of Public Economics, 66, 33-53.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Matsumoto, Mutsumi (2000), “A Note on the Composition of Public Expenditure under Capital Tax Competition,” International Taxation and Public Finance, 7, 697-697.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oates, Wallace E. (1972), Fiscal Federalism, New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rosen, Harvey S. (2005), Public Finance, New York:McGraw-Hill Irwin.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tannenwald, R. (2001), “Tax Competiton,” Encyclopedia of Taxation and Fiscal Policy, 433-436.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tiebout, Charles M. (1956), “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wildasin, David E. and John Douglas Wilson (1996), “Imperfect Mobility and Local Government Behaviour in an Overlapping-Generations Model,” “Journal of Public Economics, 60, 177-198.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wildasin, David E. (1989), “Interjurisdictional Capital Mobility:Fiscal Externality and a Corrective Subsidy,” Journal of Urban Economics, 25, 193-212.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wilson, John Douglas (1999), “Theories of Tax Competition,” National Tax Journal, 52, 269-304.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zodrow, George R. and Peter Mieszkowski (1986), “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods,” Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356-370.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zodrow, George R. (2001), “The Property Tax as a Capital Tax:A Room with Three Views,” National Tax Journal, 54, 139-156.zh_TW