學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 從價補貼與從量補貼之比較—多家國內廠商的情況
Specific versus Ad Valorem Subsidies.The Case of Multiple Domestic Firms
作者 曾文昕
Tseng, Wen-Hsin
貢獻者 翁堃嵐
曾文昕
Tseng, Wen-Hsin
關鍵詞 最適出口貿易政策
成本差異
廠商家數
日期 2007
上傳時間 18-Sep-2009 11:00:46 (UTC+8)
摘要 從價與從量此二種出口政策之福利比較的文獻,並沒有將本國廠商間成本的差異納入考量。因而本文延伸楊雅博 (2005) 一文之假設,將該模型擴展至本國廠商的家數不只一家的情況。本論文的主要發現是,不管有沒有考慮出口政策造成的社會成本問題,在本國廠商的生產成本存在差異的情況下,若本國的出口政策為對出口品補貼時,則從量補貼政策下的福利水準會較高,反之,若本國的出口政策為對出口品課稅時,則從價補貼政策下的福利水準會較高。值得一提的是,當本國廠商的家數等於1,抑或是本國廠商的成本相同時,本文的結論將退化為楊雅博 (2005)與Hwang et. al (1997) 的結果;因而該二文可視為本論文的一個特例。
參考文獻 楊雅博 (2005),“最適策略性出口政策:從量補貼或從價補貼?”, 經濟論文叢刊, 33(3), 287-307。
Anderson, S. P. , Andre de Palma and Brent Kreider (2001),“The efficiency of indirect taxes under imperfect competition,”Journal of Public Economics, 81, 231-251.
Brander, J.A. and B. J. Spencer (1985),“Export subsidies and international market rivalry,” Journal of International Economics, 18, 83-100.
Delipalla, S., Keen, M. (1992), “The comparison between ad valorem and specific taxation under imperfect competition,” Journal of Public Economics, 49, 351-361.
Dixit,A.(1984),“International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries,”Economic Journal, 94, 1-16.
Gaudet, G. and S.W. Salant (1991), “Increasing the profits of a subset of firms in oligopoly models with strategic substitutes,” American Economic Review, 81, 658-665.
Hwang, H., K. Miyagiwa and K. Y. Wong (1997),“Strategic export subsidies under a budget constraint: ad valorem versus specific,” Journal of Economic Integration, 37, 198-218.
Krishna, K. and M. Thursby (1991), “Optimal policies with strategic distortions,” Journal of International Economics, 31, 291-308.
Long, N. V. and Antoine Soubeyran(1997),“Cost heterogeneity, industry concentration and strategic trade polocies,” Journal of International Economics, 43, 207-220.
Myles, G.D. (1996), “Imperfect Competition and the Optimal Combination of ad valorem and Specific Taxation,” International Tax and Public Finance, 3, 29-44.
Neary, J. P. (1994),“Cost asymmetries in international subsidy games; Should government help winners or losers?”Journal of International Economics, 37, 197-218.
Salant,S.(1984),“Export Subsidies as Instruments of Economic and Foreign Policies,”mimeo,Development of Economics, University of Michigan.
Skeath, S.E., and G.A. Trandel (1994), “A Pareto Comparison of Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes in Noncompetitive Environments.” Journal of Public Economics, 53,53-71.
Suits, D.B., Musgrave, R.A.(1953),“Ad valorem and unit taxes compared,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 67, 598-604.
Wicksell, K. (1896), Finanztheoretische Untersuchunfen, nebst Darstellung und Kritik des Steuerwesens Scwedens. Jena: Gustav Fisher. (translated as “Taxation in the monopoly case,” in R.A. Musgrave and C.S. Shoup (eds.)), Readings in the Economics of taxation (London: Allen and Unwin, 1959).
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政研究所
94255029
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094255029
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 翁堃嵐zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 曾文昕zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Tseng, Wen-Hsinen_US
dc.creator (作者) 曾文昕zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tseng, Wen-Hsinen_US
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 18-Sep-2009 11:00:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Sep-2009 11:00:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Sep-2009 11:00:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094255029en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34722-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94255029zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 從價與從量此二種出口政策之福利比較的文獻,並沒有將本國廠商間成本的差異納入考量。因而本文延伸楊雅博 (2005) 一文之假設,將該模型擴展至本國廠商的家數不只一家的情況。本論文的主要發現是,不管有沒有考慮出口政策造成的社會成本問題,在本國廠商的生產成本存在差異的情況下,若本國的出口政策為對出口品補貼時,則從量補貼政策下的福利水準會較高,反之,若本國的出口政策為對出口品課稅時,則從價補貼政策下的福利水準會較高。值得一提的是,當本國廠商的家數等於1,抑或是本國廠商的成本相同時,本文的結論將退化為楊雅博 (2005)與Hwang et. al (1997) 的結果;因而該二文可視為本論文的一個特例。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章緒論..............................1

第二章最適出口貿易政策....................5
第一節基本模型...........................5
第二節最適從量貿易政策....................6
第三節最適從價貿易政策....................9

第三章福利比較..........................13
第一節忽略融通政策之社會成本的情況.........13
第二節存在融通政策之社會成本的情況.........15

第四章總結..............................18

參考文獻..................................20
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 43510 bytes-
dc.format.extent 67550 bytes-
dc.format.extent 55742 bytes-
dc.format.extent 53416 bytes-
dc.format.extent 114982 bytes-
dc.format.extent 144516 bytes-
dc.format.extent 119687 bytes-
dc.format.extent 67196 bytes-
dc.format.extent 45207 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094255029en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 最適出口貿易政策zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 成本差異zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 廠商家數zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 從價補貼與從量補貼之比較—多家國內廠商的情況zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Specific versus Ad Valorem Subsidies.The Case of Multiple Domestic Firmsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊雅博 (2005),“最適策略性出口政策:從量補貼或從價補貼?”, 經濟論文叢刊, 33(3), 287-307。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, S. P. , Andre de Palma and Brent Kreider (2001),“The efficiency of indirect taxes under imperfect competition,”Journal of Public Economics, 81, 231-251.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brander, J.A. and B. J. Spencer (1985),“Export subsidies and international market rivalry,” Journal of International Economics, 18, 83-100.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Delipalla, S., Keen, M. (1992), “The comparison between ad valorem and specific taxation under imperfect competition,” Journal of Public Economics, 49, 351-361.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dixit,A.(1984),“International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries,”Economic Journal, 94, 1-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gaudet, G. and S.W. Salant (1991), “Increasing the profits of a subset of firms in oligopoly models with strategic substitutes,” American Economic Review, 81, 658-665.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hwang, H., K. Miyagiwa and K. Y. Wong (1997),“Strategic export subsidies under a budget constraint: ad valorem versus specific,” Journal of Economic Integration, 37, 198-218.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krishna, K. and M. Thursby (1991), “Optimal policies with strategic distortions,” Journal of International Economics, 31, 291-308.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Long, N. V. and Antoine Soubeyran(1997),“Cost heterogeneity, industry concentration and strategic trade polocies,” Journal of International Economics, 43, 207-220.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Myles, G.D. (1996), “Imperfect Competition and the Optimal Combination of ad valorem and Specific Taxation,” International Tax and Public Finance, 3, 29-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Neary, J. P. (1994),“Cost asymmetries in international subsidy games; Should government help winners or losers?”Journal of International Economics, 37, 197-218.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Salant,S.(1984),“Export Subsidies as Instruments of Economic and Foreign Policies,”mimeo,Development of Economics, University of Michigan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Skeath, S.E., and G.A. Trandel (1994), “A Pareto Comparison of Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes in Noncompetitive Environments.” Journal of Public Economics, 53,53-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Suits, D.B., Musgrave, R.A.(1953),“Ad valorem and unit taxes compared,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 67, 598-604.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wicksell, K. (1896), Finanztheoretische Untersuchunfen, nebst Darstellung und Kritik des Steuerwesens Scwedens. Jena: Gustav Fisher. (translated as “Taxation in the monopoly case,” in R.A. Musgrave and C.S. Shoup (eds.)), Readings in the Economics of taxation (London: Allen and Unwin, 1959).zh_TW