dc.contributor.advisor | 汪文聖 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 吳晉緯 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Wu, Jing Wei | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 吳晉緯 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Wu, Jing Wei | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2008 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 19-Sep-2009 12:46:56 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 19-Sep-2009 12:46:56 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 19-Sep-2009 12:46:56 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0093154015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37233 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 93154015 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 97 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文試圖討論的問題乃是在胡塞爾現象學中,「客觀世界」是如何構成的。其問題意識乃是來自於其自身現象學方法的操作後果。在其著作《笛卡爾式的沈思》中,表明了其現象學被批評為「獨我論」的可能,故進而在此《沈思》的第五章中,透過一系列在其現象學中對「他人」的討論,試圖突破自身陷入獨我論框架。其進行的方式主要有兩個步驟:「特殊的主題性懸擱」以及「移情」。而具有「客觀性」的世界便是在「移情」的諸階序上漸次構成的「主體際」世界。而在此諸步驟的討論中,我關注的是「現象學式的獨我自我」到「他人構成」的「初步」關係如何可能。 而對此步驟的可能性討論及解讀,在本文中以舒茲 (A. Schutz)、呂格爾 (P. Ricoeur) 以及李南麟 (Lee Nam-In) 的三篇文獻做為主要對談者。通過舒茲的強力批判、呂格爾往肉身存有的解讀方式,以及李南麟以靜態、發生現象學的途徑試圖解釋胡塞爾被批判的困境,我們可以發現,雖然胡塞爾通過上述兩個步驟所進行的客觀世界構成可能,是無法成功的,但一般稱為「意識哲學」的胡塞爾現象學,其哲學意圖、深度及可能的發展,即已有後續哲學家往「世俗 (mundane)」、「存有論」發展的走向,進而給予我們不管在對胡塞爾自身或後來的哲學發展有更深刻的理解。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 序論 第一節 問題的歷史位置及其日常生活中的源頭 第二節 國內外研究現況 第三節 本論文的論述發展 第四節 研究方法第二章 現象學方法與獨我論 第一節 獨我論的含意及胡塞爾的陳述 第二節 舒茲及呂格爾對此處的批評及解讀 第三節 懸擱與還原 a. 懸擱與還原的基礎意涵 b. 懸擱、還原與第五《沈思》處的特殊主題化懸擱第三章 移情作用 第一節 胡塞爾論移情作用的諸環節 a. 契機 b. 開展 c. 聯想中的配對作用 d. 一種非原初的呈現 (Vergegenwärtigung) 知覺—附現 e. 通過身體間的交互作用以形成共同的客觀世界 第二節 舒茲對胡塞爾移情作用及附現的批評 a. 移情做為身體之間意義的轉移 b. 附現 第三節 從靜態與發生現象學的考察來看問題的解決 a. 引進靜態、發生現象學的契機 b. 李南麟如何通過此區別解決問題 c. 回應第四章 內在與超越 第一節 內感知、外感知與雙重的內在與超越 a. 邏輯研究中對內感知、外感知及內在與超越關係的討論 b. 內在、超越與相即性 第二節 內在、超越與本真領域 第三節 內在、超越與移情、附現第五章 結論 第一節 回顧與成果 第二節 限制及展望參考書目 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 97193 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 210538 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 137989 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 316859 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 364484 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 400011 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 288422 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 179410 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 181498 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093154015 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 胡塞爾 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 內在 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 超越 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 移情 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 客觀世界 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 獨我論 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 發生現象學 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 他人 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 現象學 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 舒茲 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 主體際性 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | E. Husserl | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Immanence | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Transcendence | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Empathy | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Objective World | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Solipsism | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Genetic Phenomenology | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | The Other | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Phenomenology | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | A. Schutz | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Intersubjectivity | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | 通往客觀世界構成的移情之路-以胡塞爾現象學中內在與超越的視野來看 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | The Constitution of the Objective World Via Empathy: In the View of the Conceptions of Immanence and Transcendence in Husserl`s Phenomenology | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、胡塞爾原著及其翻譯 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Ed. Panzer, Ursula. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1984.《邏輯研究》第二卷,第一、第二部分,倪梁康譯。北京:上海譯文出版社,2006。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen. Ed. Biemel, Walter. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973. 《現象學的觀念》,倪梁康譯。北京:人民出版社,2007。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cartesiannishe Meditationen und Paris Vorträge. Ed. S. Strasser. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1977. Cartesian Meditations. Translated by Cairns, Dorion. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Husserliana 25. Aufsze und Vortrge.(1911-1921).Ed. Nenon, Thomas and Sepp, Hanns Rainer. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ideen zur einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch. Ed. Schuhmann, Karl. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976. 《純粹現象學通論》,李幼蒸譯。北京:中國人民大學出版社,2004。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ideen Zur Einer Reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweiter Buch. Translated by Rojcewicz, Richard and Schuwer, André: Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Philosophie als Strenge Wissenschaft. Frankfurt am Mein: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH, 1965. 《哲學做為嚴格的科學》,倪梁康譯。北京:商務印書館,2007。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Formal and Transcendental Logic. Translated by Dorion Cairns. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. From the Lectures, Winter Semester, 1910-1911. Translated by Farin, Ingo & G. Hart, James, The Netherlands: Springer, 2006. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Erfahrung und Urteil. R & h. von Ludwig Landgrebe. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1985. 《經驗與判斷》。鄧曉芒,張廷國譯。上海:生活‧讀書‧新知三聯書店,1999年。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Erste Philisophie. zweiter Teil. H. von Rudolf Boehm. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1956. 《第一哲學》,下卷,王炳文譯。北京:商務印書管,2006。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Die Krisis der Europaisches Wissenschaften Und Die Transzedentale Phänomenologie(B. V: Kluwer Academic 1976)《歐洲科學的危機與超越論的現象學》,王炳文譯;北京:商務印書館,2001。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ananysen zur Passiven Synthesis. Hua. XI. Translated by Anthony J. Steinbock: Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis : lectures on transcendental logic. Dordrecht/ Boston/ London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Die Phänomenologische Methode. Ed. By Klaus Held. Stuttgart: Philipp Recalm, 1985.《現象學的方法》,倪梁康譯。上海:上海譯文出版社,2005年。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、中文相關研究 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 汪文聖:<「描述」與「解釋」-胡塞爾現象學作為科學哲學之一探討>。《哲學雜誌》,第20期。台北:聯合發行中心,1997年。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——〈《邏輯研究》第二卷,第一部份導讀〉。台北:時報出版,1994。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——〈自然與精神間的衝突或協調? - 胡塞爾現象學主體際構成的力量探源〉。《揭諦》,第14期,2008年二月。頁1-36。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——〈對於他者真實構成的力量探求 – 從胡塞爾現象學的觀點出發〉《台灣東亞文明研究期刊》第四卷第二期,2007年12月,頁27-54。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅麗君:〈胡塞爾現象學中的單子論對萊布尼茲單子概念的繼承與轉化〉。《揭諦》,第八期,2005年四月。頁211-243。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 游淙祺:《社會世界與文化差異 – 現象學的考察》。台北市:大雁文化(漫遊者文化),2007。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 倪梁康:《胡塞爾現象學概念通釋》。北京:生活‧讀書‧新知三聯書店,2007。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——:《自識與反思 – 近現代西方哲學的基本問題》。北京:商務印書館,2002。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡美麗:《胡塞爾》。台北:東大出版,1990。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅伯‧索科羅斯基 (Robert Sokolowski):《現象學十四講》,李維倫譯。台北:心靈工坊文化出版,2004。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 克勞斯‧黑爾德 (Klaus Held):《現象學的方法》導言。倪梁康譯。上海:上海譯文出版社,2005。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——:《生活世界現象學》導言。倪梁康、張廷國譯。上海:上海藝文出版社,2005。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 讓‧保羅‧沙特 (J-P. Sartre):《自我的超越性-一種現象學描述初探》。杜小真譯。北京:商務印書館,2005。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 柯林‧戴維斯 (Colin Davis):《列維納斯》。李瑞華譯。南京:江蘇人民出版社,2006。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 阿弗德‧休慈 (Alfred Schutz):《馬克斯‧謝勒三論》。江日新譯。台北:東大圖書公司,1990。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 三、外文相關研究 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cairns, Dorion: Conversation with Husserl and Fink. Ed. Zaner, Richard M. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crowell, S. G. : “Solipsism”. In The prism of the self- philosophical essays in honor of Maurice Natanson. Ed. By | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Steven Galt Crowell. Dordrecht, The Netherlands ; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fink, Eugen: Sixth Cartesian Meditation. Translated by Ronald Bruzina. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. 1988. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gurwitsch, Aron: The Field of Consciousness. Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press, 1964. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mensch, James Richard: Intersubjectivity and Transcendental Idealism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stein, Edith: On the Problem of Empathy. Translated by Waltraut Stein. Washington, D.C.: ICS Publications, 1989. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smith, A. D.: Routledge philosophy guidebook to Husserl and the Cartesian meditations. London ; New York : Routledge, 2003. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kern, Iso: “The three ways to the transcendental phenomenological reduction in the philosophy of Edmund”. In Husserl: Expositions and appraisals, pp.126-149. Notre Dame, Ind. : University of Notre Dame Press, c1977 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bernet, Rudolf; Kern, Iso; Marbach, Eduard: An Introduction to Husserlian Phenomenology. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1999. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nam- In, Lee: “Static-Phenomenological and Genetic-Phenomenological of Primordiality in Husserl’s Fifth Cartesian Meditation.” In Husserl Studies, 18, 165-183. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ricoeur, Paul: Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Translated by Edward G. Ballard and Lester E. Embree. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brough, John B. :“Consciousness is not a Bag: Immanence, Transcendence, and Constitution in The Ideas of Phenomenology.” Husserl Studies, (2008), 24, pp. 177-191. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Donohoe, Janet: Husserl on ethics and intersubjectivity : from static to genetic phenomenology. Amherst, N.Y. : Humanity Books, 2004. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ströke, Elisabeth: “The Problem of The Epoché in Husserl’s Philosophy.” In Dermot Moran, Lester Embree (ed.): Phenomenology – Critic Concepts in Philosophy. Vol. 1. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2004. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schutz, Alfred: “The Problem of Transcendental Intersubjectivity in Husserl. ” Translated by Frederick | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kersten. Dermot Moran, Lester Embree (ed.): Phenomenology – Critic Concepts in Philosophy. Vol. 2. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2004. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Seebohm, Thomas:“ The Other in the Field of Consciousness.” (ed.) Embree, Lester: Essays in Memory of | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Aron Gurwitsch. Pittsburgh: Center of Advanced Research in Phenomenology, 1983. pp. 283-303. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Landgrebe, Ludwig: “The Problem of Passive Constitution” Translated by Donn Welton. Dermot Moran, Lester Embree (ed.): Phenomenology – Critic Concepts in Philosophy. Vol. 1. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2004. pp.265-278. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Taminiaux, Jacques: “Immanence, transcendence and being in Husserl’s Idea of Phenomenology.” In The Collegium Phaenomenologicum. The first ten years. Ed. By John Sallis, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Giuseppina C. Moneta and Jacques Taminiaux. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwar Academic Publishers, 1988. Pp.47-75. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Waldenfels, Bernhard: The Question of the Other. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2007. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zahavi, Dan: Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity: a Response to the Linguistic-Pragmatic Critique. Translated by Elizabeth A. Behnke , Athens: Ohio University Press, 2001. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——: “Husserl’s Intersubjective Transformation of Transcendental Phenomenology”, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Vol.27, 03, October. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——: “Beyond Empathy - Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity.” Phenomenology- Critical Concepts in Philosophy. Vol. 2. Ed. By Dermot Moran and Lester E. Embree. London and New York: Routledge, 2004. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——: Subjectivity and Selfhood- Investigating the First-Person Perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The MIT Press, 2005. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Merleau-Ponty, Maurice: Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Colin Smith. London & New York: Routledge, 1958. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ——: “The Child’s Relations with Others.” In The Primacy of Perception. Ed. By James M. Edie. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1964. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Moneta, Giuseppina C.: On Identity- A Study in Genetic Phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sartre, Jean-Paul: Being and Nothingness. Translated by Hazel E. Barnes. London: Routledge, 2002. | zh_TW |